Comparison between how US policy is depicted in

local and international media.

Opening statement

Shaping Minds: Media’s Role in Public Perception

of U.S. Middle East Policy"
We all know that press mainly have very important rule on public opinion
that how its shapes and construct their perception to some thing.mainly in
term of making foreign policy .diffrent sources of media from the region of
middle east and across the world have played a crucial role in constructing
people's perceptions on US foreign policy, particularly for making the actions
in the Middle East such as military intervention, diplomacy, and economic
point of view. When it comes to foreign perspectives on US policies, CNN,
BBC, and Al-Jazeera are main actors in spreading and making perception of
people on US foreign policy. However, regional Middle Eastern media sources
approach the analysis of these policies in a unique way, focusing on their
direct consequences on the region rather than a broader global perspective.
Therefore, this paper will concentrate on the contrasting ways that local
Middle Eastern media and international media frame their coverage of U.S.
foreign policy.

My study will also evaluate the differences related to media framing, and
provide possible solutions to the problems in popular culture media. By
examining these interactions, the essay uncovers the crucial role of creating
connections between the public and the role of media in shaping a global
point of views regarding US foreign policy

Evolution of Media Coverage on U.S. Foreign Policy

in the Middle East: A Historical Perspective"
During a period in the region of Middle East, significant events in US foreign
policy was seen, with Middle Eastern countries and the international
community were observing all occurrences and situations. The war in middle
east is a prime illustration of the stark contrast between the two
perspectives. Middle Eastern sources in the vicinity depicted the invasion as
an act of aggression and wrongdoing due to the high number of civilian
casualties, destroyed infrastructure, and ongoing instability. Al Jazeera Arabic
frequently covered and highlighted the hardships faced by countries
refugees, illustrating the societal impacts of war as a humanitarian crisis
exacerbated by American intervention in that region mainly like Iraq war.

CNN and Fox News, foreign news sources, emphasized the U.S. government's
arguments about weapon of mass destruction presence and the push for
democratizing that region mainly Iraq. The political differences in discursive
construction varies based on geographical position and audience
expectation. Western sources typically focus on narrating stories that align
with US foreign policy, while Middle Eastern media prioritize highlighting the
practical impacts on societies.

Media coverage has also shifted in other instances, such as the Arab Spring,
the rise of ISIS, and the recent Iran nuclear situation. For example, Al Arabiya
covered the Arab Spring as peaceful movements attempting to overthrow
oppressive regimes for freedom, but interfered with by outside influences.
Simultaneously, worldwide connections added complexity to these narratives
by framing American actions as presents, penalties, support, or negotiations
as components of complete plans for security.

"MiddleEastern Media Highlights Critical

Perspectives on the Framing of U.S. Foreign Policy"
Local Middle Eastern media sources consistently harbor a disapproving
stance towards US foreign policies, primarily due to their direct impact on
Middle Eastern countries. It often portrays the US as a dominating force in
the country, primarily serving its own interests while ignoring the well-being
of the locals. Al Quds Al Arabi and Al Akhbar are the primary sources where
the results of USA actions are viewed as significant outcomes such as human
casualties, fatalities, displacement, and minimize the sovereignty.

Reporting on the operations of UAVs in Yemeni territory is one of them. Local

media channels report on the violence, expose the lack of protection for
innocent civilians, and present these actions within the framework of
international laws. This framing continues a narrative of opposition to U.S.
policies, leading to a rise in anti-American sentiment in the region. Similarly,
the economic sanctions imposed by the United States on nations like Iran are
seen as a way of seeking revenge that excessively burdens the people and
worsens unemployment, inflation, and shortages of essential goods.

Another topic examined in the article is the questioning of whether the US

diplomatic efforts are seen as motivating, a sentiment frequently echoed in
local media. This prompts inquiry into why local media in the involved
countries perceived the U.S.-brokered Abraham Accords, which established
diplomatic ties between Israel and multiple Arab nations, as a betrayal of the
Palestinian cause. The way immigrants are perceived in media in Western
countries is very different from the positive image often portrayed,
highlighting how media representation reflects the challenges of
globalization.

"Global Media: Striving for Balance in Coverage of

U.S. Foreign Policy"
Even the global versions of newspapers and magazines, despite their wide
scope, still exhibit biases towards certain countries and demographics due to
political loyalties. For example, in terms of storytelling network, CNN and
BBC encompass U.S. foreign policy as consisting of a mix of different
insecure and other national priorities for policy development, global norms,
and ethical values. These channels often present a narrative showcasing the
United States as leading the way in addressing global threats like terrorism
and the spread of nuclear weapons.

The most recent demonstration of America rescaling the Global War on Terror
is the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. While local news sources in
the Middle East focused on the unrest and pain caused by the withdrawal,
CNN international highlighted that the withdrawal would result in America
being seen as less reliable and the world becoming a less secure place. This
difference demonstrates the impact of the media’s target audience and their
beliefs about the US role in international relations on framing decisions.

Al Jazeera English is the global branch of the network, with its roots firmly in
the Middle East. It often addresses problems it believes exist within the US
political system, but does this while considering global perspectives. The
materials related to the Iran nuclear deal concentrate on the viewpoints of
regional states and the global efforts against nuclear weapons.

Crafting U.S. Foreign Policy: The Interplay of

Military Action, Diplomacy, and Economic Strategy"
Therefore, the way in which the US foreign policy is structured varies
significantly in relation to the military, diplomacy, and economics.

Armed Forces Involvement

The American-led military missions are occasionally depicted in the local
media as sources of unrest and suffering. An example is the way Syrian
media reported on the outcomes of the US-led air strikes during the Syrian
conflict, in contrast to Western media which justified the necessity of
launching such campaigns against ISIS. Local media depict a narrative of
resistance against foreign colonization, focusing on civilian casualties and
weakening national sovereignty.

The practice of conducting international relations

using tact and skill.
In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Middle Eastern channels locally criticize the
US's biased and unhelpful mediations favoring Israel. However, the global
media depicts US diplomacy as commendable yet imperfect in striving for
peace in a delicate region of the world. This distinction in framing arises from
contrasting opinions regarding the US's role as either a hegemonic power or
a mediatory power in global politics.

Policy on the economy

Economic sanctions, such as those imposed on Iran, are framed differently in
some other areas. Electronic and print media focus more on local events and
emphasize the hardships faced by ordinary individuals. Western media often
utilizes sanctions as strategic tools to deter hostile governments and
promote global harmony. This difference illustrates how media can either
portray the effects of these economic policies as more individualized or less.

Improving Media Coverage of U.S. Foreign Policy:

Key Recommendations"
Both films present contrasting views on American foreign policy and raise
ethical concerns about the impact of media influence. Should media strive
for impartiality in their coverage, or are they obligated to prioritize the well-
being of their audience? Biases impacting discussions lead to certain aspects
of U.S. policies being prioritized over others.

One example is how global sources tend to rely on official statements from
the U.S. government and insights from experts with a Western heritage.
Utilizing this approach primarily upholds the deficit model and marginalizes
the perspective of Middle Eastern individuals in representing the impact they
face as a result of U.S policies. Conversely, Middle Eastern media outlets may
highlight themes of suffering and resistance, potentially creating perceptions
of a sharp conflict between Middle Eastern countries and America's foreign
policies.

Suggestions for improving media coverage of US

foreign policy findings.
both domestic and international media need to adopt a more balanced
approach when analyzing US foreign policy.

Local media: It is important for local news sources to make an effort to

present both the negative impacts of U.S policies on other countries' people,
as well as the positive outcomes. An example could be the inclusion of
mentions of US aid and efforts to strengthen stability in the region to create
a more unbiased article.

Global Media: International outlets need to prioritize the perspectives of

Middle Eastern individuals like ordinary citizens, scholars, and advocates who
are directly affected by the United States' actions. More attention could be
devoted to improving the examination of the long-term impacts of policies.

Summary
The paper examined how both local and international media in the Middle
East shape perceptions of U.S. foreign policy and influence public opinion in
the region. Local media often focus on the negative consequences of
America's actions, while international media may offer a more balanced
perspective or even show support. This similarity can be unsettling.

Analyzing these two frames reveals that media stories are created socially,
influenced by geopolitical alliances, consumer attitudes, and ethical
principles. Multiple instances indicate that adopting a more expansive and
less predictable strategy could avoid reinforcing stereotypes, resulting in a
well-informed conversation about American interactions with the Middle East.

references with proper citations:

1. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of
Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Examines the transformative impact of globalization on culture, identity, and

media.

2. Hall, S. (1997). Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London:

Sage Publications.
Explores the role of media and cultural practices in shaping meanings and
collective identities.

3. Morley, D., & Robins, K. (1995). Spaces of Identity: Global Media, Electronic
Landscapes, and Cultural Boundaries. London: Routledge.

Investigates the effects of global media on cultural hybridity and boundary

redefinition

4. Gitlin, T. (2003). Media Unlimited: How the Torrent of Images and Sounds
Overwhelms Our Lives. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

Discusses the overwhelming influence of global media in shaping perceptions

and identities.