How to Integrate the Curricula 3rd Edition Robin J. Fogarty 2024 scribd download
How to Integrate the Curricula 3rd Edition Robin J. Fogarty 2024 scribd download
https://ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/how-to-integrate-
the-curricula-3rd-edition-robin-j-fogarty/
https://ebookultra.com/download/sales-promotion-how-to-create-
implement-and-integrate-campaigns-that-really-work-3rd-edition-julian-
cummins/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/sales-promotion-how-to-create-
implement-and-integrate-campaigns-that-really-work-4th-edition-roddy-
mullin/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/strategies-to-integrate-the-arts-in-
mathematics-1st-edition-linda-dacey/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/designing-and-assessing-courses-and-
curricula-a-practical-guide-3rd-edition-robert-m-diamond/
ebookultra.com
The encyclopedia of child abuse 3rd ed Edition Robin E.
Clark
https://ebookultra.com/download/the-encyclopedia-of-child-abuse-3rd-
ed-edition-robin-e-clark/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/how-to-research-3rd-ed-edition-
lorraine-blaxter/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/turn-redundancy-to-opportunity-how-
to-3rd-edition-laurel-alexander/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/a-textbook-of-christian-ethics-3rd-
edition-robin-gill/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/how-to-treat-persons-1st-edition-
samuel-j-kerstein/
ebookultra.com
How to Integrate the Curricula 3rd Edition Robin J.
Fogarty Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Robin J. Fogarty, Brian Mitchell Pete
ISBN(s): 9781412938891, 1412938899
Edition: 3
File Details: PDF, 1.87 MB
Year: 2009
Language: english
The poet, who navigates the stars . . .
The writer, who touches the soul . . .
The inventor, who notes nature’s ways . . .
The friend, who connects one with another . . .
Copyright © 2009 by Corwin
All rights reserved. When forms and sample documents are included, their use is authorized only
by educators, local school sites, and/or noncommercial or nonprofit entities that have purchased
the book. Except for that usage, no part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or
by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any
information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
For information:
Corwin SAGE India Pvt. Ltd.
A SAGE Company B 1/I 1 Mohan Cooperative Industrial Area
2455 Teller Road Mathura Road, New Delhi
Thousand Oaks, California 91320 India 110 044
(800) 233-9936
Fax: (800) 417-2466
www.corwinpress.com
Fogarty, Robin.
How to integrate the curricula / Robin Fogarty.—3rd ed.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-1-4129-3888-4 (cloth : alk. paper)
ISBN 978-1-4129-3889-1 (pbk. : alk. paper)
1. Education—Curricula—United States—Handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. Interdisciplinary
approach in education—United States—Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Title.
LB1570.F655 2009
375—dc22 2008056034
09 10 11 12 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Foreword viii
Heidi Hayes Jacobs
Acknowledgments ix
About the Author xii
Introduction 1
What Is This Book All About? 1
Why Bother? 3
The Theorists: Research on the Brain and Learning 3
The Practitioners: Abandonment of an Overloaded
Curriculum and Adherence to Standards of Learning 6
The Parents: What Will Our Children Need
25 Years From Now? 7
The Students: Education Is a Vaccination 9
How Can the Curriculum Be Integrated? 9
10 Models of Integrating the Curricula 10
Agree/Disagree Introductory Activity 10
Four-Fold Concept Development Activity 16
Examples of the Four-Fold Concept Development Activity 18
How Do Teachers Use This Book? 21
Model 1. Cellular 22
What Is the Cellular Model? 22
What Does It Look Like? 23
What Does It Sound Like? 23
What Are the Advantages? 23
What Are the Disadvantages? 24
When Is This Cellular Model Useful? 24
How to Integrate the Curricula Working With Model 1: Cellular 25
Model 2. Connected 31
What Is the Connected Model? 31
What Does It Look Like? 32
What Does It Sound Like? 32
What Are the Advantages? 32
What Are the Disadvantages? 32
When Is This Connected Model Useful? 33
How to Integrate the Curricula Working With Model 2: Connected 37
Model 3. Nested 39
What Is the Nested Model? 39
What Does It Look Like? 40
What Does It Sound Like? 40
What Are the Advantages? 41
What Are the Disadvantages? 41
When Is This Nested Model Useful? 41
How to Integrate the Curricula Working With Model 3: Nested 42
Model 4. Sequenced 48
What Is the Sequenced Model? 48
What Does It Look Like? 49
What Does It Sound Like? 49
What Are the Advantages? 49
What Are the Disadvantages? 50
When Is This Sequenced Model Useful? 50
How to Integrate the Curricula Working With Model 4: Sequenced 51
Model 5. Shared 57
What Is the Shared Model? 57
What Does It Look Like? 57
What Does It Sound Like? 58
What Are the Advantages? 58
What Are the Disadvantages? 59
When Is This Shared Model Useful? 59
How to Integrate the Curricula Working With Model 5: Shared 63
Model 6. Webbed 65
What Is the Webbed Model? 65
What Does It Look Like? 66
What Does It Sound Like? 66
What Are the Advantages? 67
What Are the Disadvantages? 67
When Is This Webbed Model Useful? 67
How to Integrate the Curricula Working With Model 6: Webbed 77
Model 7. Threaded 79
What Is the Threaded Model? 79
What Does It Look Like? 80
What Does It Sound Like? 80
What Are the Advantages? 82
What Are the Disadvantages? 82
When Is This Threaded Model Useful? 83
How to Integrate the Curricula Working With Model 7: Threaded 90
Model 8. Integrated 92
What Is the Integrated Model? 92
What Does It Look Like? 93
What Does It Sound Like? 93
What Are the Advantages? 93
What Are the Disadvantages? 94
When Is This Integrated Model Useful? 94
How to Integrate the Curricula Working With Model 8:
Integrated 95
Model 9. Immersed 102
What Is the Immersed Model? 102
What Does It Look Like? 103
What Does It Sound Like? 103
What Are the Advantages? 103
What Are the Disadvantages? 103
When Is This Immersed Model Useful? 104
How to Integrate the Curricula Working With Model 9:
Immersed 108
Model 10. Networked 110
What Is the Networked Model? 110
What Does It Look Like? 111
What Does It Sound Like? 111
What Are the Advantages? 111
What Are the Disadvantages? 111
When Is This Networked Model Useful? 112
How to Integrate the Curricula Working With Model 10:
Networked 116
Appendix. Assessing Curriculum Integration: Units of Study 118
Appraising Curriculum Integration 118
Appraising the Integrity of the Breadth and
Depth of the Curriculum Integration Unit 119
Sample Rubric 120
Assessing the Effectiveness of the Unit in
Terms of Student Achievement 124
General Rubric 125
History Rubric 125
Language Arts Rubric 125
Conclusion 127
References 128
Index 134
Foreword
I n the spirit of continuous learning, Dr. Robin Fogarty has added new insight
into this third edition of How to Integrate the Curricula. Her initial contribu-
tion to the field of education was to give teachers clear and practical images and
exercises that provoked new perspectives on curriculum making. In this edi-
tion, she builds and adds useful suggestions that deepen the work. She has
added refined practices, engaging strategies, and targeted research references
to support her models for curriculum design.
Ultimately, this is a practical book supported by strong theoretical underpin-
nings. It is a useful tool for inservice workshops and personal instructional
growth that teachers and staff developers will find extremely helpful. Dr. Fogarty
has a knack for cutting directly to key points in an engaging style. Certainly the
goal of any professional improvement plan is to eventually help learners. How
to Integrate the Curricula can help educators assist all learners in the classroom
to be thoughtful, creative, and mindful.
Dr. Heidi Hayes Jacobs
President, Curriculum Designers
Rye, New York
viii
Acknowledgments
T his book took a year—plus a lifetime—to write! The thoughts shared here
represent an accumulation of ideas over time and present the core of the
integrated learner model. Learners must constantly and continually make con-
nections. As they proceed on their journeys, they single-mindedly dig into an
idea and at the same time network with others for breadth across related fields.
As a result, concepts come into focus and emerge as beliefs that propel learners
even further along on their chosen path and into never-ending circles of expert
associates. In my work with curriculum and cognitive instruction, two camps
of expert associates have influenced my thinking about how to integrate the
curricula: expert theorists and expert practitioners.
In the theorists’ camp, I’d like to acknowledge Heidi Hayes Jacobs for pro-
viding the initial impetus for this work. Her “Design Options for an Integrated
Curriculum” (in Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation; Jacobs,
1989) acted as a catalyst for the ideas presented in this book.
In addition, I am especially grateful to David Perkins for an illuminating dis-
cussion on finding fertile themes with which to integrate curricula. With his
rich criteria, this thematic model takes on new integrity. In the absence of
applied criteria, topical themes are often superficial, with content artificially
included or excluded accordingly. David’s “lenses” provide the needed rigor. In
addition, thanks go to David for the idea of the characters placed in a school set-
ting. This sparked the inclusion of the dialogues that appear throughout the
book to illuminate the teachers’ process as they move toward a more coherent
curriculum.
Finally, also in the theorists’ camp, I’d like to thank Art Costa for his initial
review of the integrated models and his timely suggestion for one that illus-
trates how a teacher targets several ideas in a single lesson or nests several ideas
together—thus, the nested Model 3.
Now, in the practitioners’ camp, there are five distinct expert flanks.
Influencing the first two editions of this book were teachers from
Carpentersville, Illinois; the Waterford School District, in Michigan; the
Richmond School District, in British Columbia, Canada; and Virginia Beach
Schools, in Virginia. The final group, which influenced this latest edition, were
Singaporean teachers from Teach Less, Learn More (TLLM) Ignite Schools.
Elementary and middle school teachers from Carpentersville, Illinois,
worked on models to help integrate the curricula for lessons and learners. Some
of their lesson designs appear as examples in this book. I thank the following
ix
x HOW TO INTEGRATE THE CURRICULA
teachers for their early efforts in exploring this idea of an integrated curricu-
lum: Carol Bonebrake, Jane Atherton, Suzanne Raymond, Barbara Bengston,
Al Eck, Kathleen Vehring, Roseanne Day, Nancy Blackman, Clifford Berutti,
Linda Morning, Diane Gray, and Terri Pellant.
Thanks to Julie Casteel and her teachers in Michigan, especially Al
Monetta, Chris Brakke, Lori Broughton, and Sue Barber, who provided the top-
ics to fill in the first model in Figure 1.1. A pioneer practitioner leading the
thinking skills movement into action research teams, Julie Casteele was on the
cutting edge with the integrated learning idea. Thanks to both Julie and her
risk-taking staff for letting me test the models with real teachers.
Thanks also to friends and colleagues in Canada, first to Carol-Lyn Sakata,
who brought us there, then to Bruce Beairsto, David Shore, and Darlene
Macklam, for introducing us to the teachers of Richmond. Their heroic efforts
to implement a visionary provincial document, Year 2000: A Framework for
Learning, inspired our work. I am especially indebted to one teacher, Heather
MacLaren. She asked her seventh graders to prepare to talk at their parent con-
ferences about what they had done that year and how all the things they had
learned overlapped and were connected. The students’ intricate Venn diagrams
provided graphic representations of integrating the curricula as perceived
through the eyes of learners. These drawings sparked our thinking about cre-
ative, integrative models.
With 80 teachers in a summer workshop in Richmond called “Teaching for
Transfer,” including John Barell, David Perkins, and our superhero, Captain
Meta Cognition, we had a first stab at trying to help teachers sift out curricular
priorities. This, too, served as an initial springboard for our ideas about how to
integrate the curricula. Also, special thanks to Monica Pamer, Gina Rae, and
Jacquie Anderson for their conversations and encouragement.
The fourth set of practitioners are those from the Virginia Beach Schools.
Their work with student learning standards in designing performance tasks
illuminates the process of designing integrated curricula with the “standards
in mind.” For their robust performance tasks, I am most grateful.
And for the fifth set of pioneering educators, I must salute the Singapore
Ministry of Education leadership, especially Karen Lam and Puay Lim; the
Academy of Principals and the efforts of Ezra Ng; and the TLLM Ignite school
teams for their dedicated efforts in creating more engaged learning models with
the integrated curriculum approach. Working with the 10 models, these teach-
ers are dedicated to the development of an integrated curriculum that demon-
strates richness, rigor, and integrity. We value their work immensely as it
enhances ours.
I would be remiss if I neglected to mention the network of colleagues who
have helped shape this book. Thanks to Jim Bellanca for his mentoring ways;
Hudson Perigo for shepherding the process with skill and charm; and last but
not least, our office administrator, Megan Moore, for her invaluable assistance
in organizing and reorganizing, formatting and reformatting, editing and
re-editing, and submitting and resubmitting. She has been a godsend in this
endeavor.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xi
PUBLISHER’S ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Corwin gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the following reviewers:
John C. Baker
Eighth-Grade Social Studies Teacher/Department Chair
Salem Middle School
Apex, NC
Julie Prescott
Assessment Coordinator
Vallivue High School
Caldwell, ID
Darlene Vigil
Language Arts Coordinator
Albuquerque Public Schools
Albuquerque, NM
Mark White
Elementary School Principal
Hintgen Elementary School
La Crosse, WI
About the Author
xii
Introduction
To the young mind every thing is individual, stands by itself. By and by, it
finds how to join two things and see in them one nature; then three, then
three thousand; and so, tyrannized over by its own unifying instinct, it
goes on tying things together, diminishing anomalies, discovering roots
running underground whereby contrary and remote things cohere and
flower out from one stem. . . . The astronomer discovers that geometry, a
pure abstraction of the human mind, is the measure of planetary motion.
The chemist finds proportions and intelligible method throughout matter;
and science is nothing but the finding of analogy, identity, in the most
remote parts.
—Emerson
1
2 HOW TO INTEGRATE THE CURRICULA
Model Definition
Nested Model Targeting multi-dimensional skills and concepts into one lesson
Sequenced Model Rearranging sequence when a topic is taught to coincide with a parallel
topic in another discipline
Shared Model Integrating one subject with another through the learner’s
conceptual eye
Webbed Model Weaving natural and obvious themes of a subject (such as the work of
an artist or writer) into the fabric of a discipline
Threaded Model Integrating what is taught with cognitive tools, strategies, and technical
tools that cross disciplines
Immersed Model Connecting past experiences and prior knowledge with new
information
Networked Model Building new bonds of interest with other experts through networking
WHY BOTHER?
Why bother being concerned with a coherent curriculum? What is the
rationale for connecting ideas, discerning themes, and threading skills?
The answer lies in the four winds of change, coming from four distinct
directions, that create the urgency for a more integrated curriculum. The
north and south represent the ideas of educational theorists and the chal-
lenges of practitioners; the east and west represent the concerns of parents
and the perspective of students themselves. From the theorists come data
on teaching, learning, and the human brain; from the practitioners, frus-
tration with an overcrowded standards-based and test-driven curriculum.
From opposite vectors, parents are concerned about student preparation
and readiness for real-world issues, while students see learning as fractured
and not very relevant. A closer look at these crosswinds of change reveals
their impact on the current educational climate of school reform in our
nation’s schools.
5. The brain has a spatial memory system and a set of systems for rote learning.
9. Understanding and remembering occur best when the facts are embedded in natural,
spatial memory.
Figure 0.1 Caine & Caine’s 12 Principles of the Brain and Learning
SOURCE: Adapted from Making Connections: Teaching and the Human Brain, by R. N. Caine and G. Caine,
1994, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Copyright 1994 by Geoffrey Caine. Adapted with permission.
4 HOW TO INTEGRATE THE CURRICULA
5. The brain has a spatial memory system and a set of systems for rote learn-
ing. There are facts and skills that are dealt with in isolation and require
rehearsal, and at the same time there is natural, spatial memory that needs no
rehearsal and affords instant memory. Therefore, rote memorization tech-
niques are necessary for fostering long-term learning for transfer. Rote memo-
rization requires more conscious effort to remember because the facts may have
little meaning or relevance to the learner. When the brain senses that there is
no need to remember, it tends to let go of the information. Therefore, rote mem-
orization of isolated facts often needs more explicit work to learn and recall
information, whereas spatial memory has built-in cues that help in the retrieval
of information. Teaching that focuses on the personal world of the learner to
make learning relevant taps into the experiential or spatial memory system. In
sum, rote memory is explicit, while spatial memory is implicit.
Making Meaning
The final three principles address the brain’s way of making meaning.
10. The search for meaning is innate. The search for meaning cannot be
stopped, only channeled and focused. Therefore, classrooms need stability and
routine as well as novelty and challenge. The learning can be shepherded explic-
itly through mediation and reflection.
11. The search for meaning occurs through patterning. The brain has a natural
capacity to integrate vast amounts of seemingly unrelated information.
Therefore, when teaching invokes integrated, thematically reflective
approaches, learning is more brain compatible and, subsequently, enhanced.
12. Learning always involves conscious and unconscious processes.
Enormous amounts of unconscious processing go on beneath the surface of
awareness. Some of this happens when a person is awake, and much of it
continues when a person is at rest or even asleep. Other learning occurs
when the person is fully conscious and aware of the process. Therefore,
teaching needs to be organized experientially and reflectively to benefit max-
imally from the deep processing.
Profile of Intelligences
In addition to these principles of the brain and learning, another important
fact is that each brain has a unique profile of intelligences (Gardner, 1983,
1999) that reveal both strengths and weaknesses in accessing learning. These
intelligences include verbal-linguistic, visual-spatial, interpersonal-social,
intrapersonal-introspective, musical-rhythmic, logical-mathematical, bodily-
kinesthetic, and naturalist-physical world.
6 HOW TO INTEGRATE THE CURRICULA
Mathematics Standards
Students will acquire a solid foundation that includes knowledge of and proficiency in:
Science Standards
Students will acquire a solid foundation that includes knowledge of and proficiency in:
1. economic principles
2. principles of democracy and processes of governance
3. geographical study and analysis
1. structures of, functions of, and relationships among human body systems
2. principles and practices of mental health
3. principles of movement and fitness
AGREE/DISAGREE
INTRODUCTORY ACTIVITY
Use the Agree/Disagree chart (Figure 0.8) to record your positions regarding
statements about integrating the curricula before reading more about it. Read
each statement and place a plus, minus, or question mark next to it.
Plus—Agree
Minus—Disagree
Question Mark—Not Sure
INTRODUCTION 11
Grade 12
Integration
Science Mathematics
Curricula
Breadth and Depth Within Discipline
Spiraling
Kindergarten
No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 No. 8 No. 9 No. 10
Ten Views for Integrating the Curricula: How Do You See It?
1 Cellular 2 Connected
Periscope—one direction; one sighting; Opera glass—details of one
narrow focus on single discipline discipline; focus on subtleties
or content area and interconnections
3 Nested 4 Sequenced
3-D glasses—multiple dimensions to Eye glasses—varied internal content
one scene, topic, or unit framed by broad, related topics
5 Shared 6 Webbed
Binoculars—two disciplines that share Telescope—broad view of an entire
overlapping concepts and skills constellation as one theme, webbed
to the various elements
7 Threaded 8 Integrated
Magnifying glass—big ideas that Kaleidoscope—new patterns and
magnify all content through a designs that use the basic elements
metacurricular approach of each discipline
9 Immersed 10 Networked
Microscope—intensely personal view Prism—a view that creates multiple
that allows microscopic exploration as dimensions and directions of focus
all content is filtered through lens of
interest and expertise
Description Example
Description Example The networked model of integrated An architect, while adapting the
The individual integrates all data, A student or doctoral candidate has learning is an ongoing external source CAD/CAM technology for design,
from every field and discipline, by an area of expert interest and sees all of input, forever providing new, networks with technical programmers
funneling the ideas through his or her learning through that lens. extended, and extrapolated or refined and expands her knowledge base, just
area of interest. ideas. as she had traditionally done with
interior designers.
1 Cellular 2 Connected
Are we or how are we setting Are we or how are we
curricular priorities? (How are connecting the curriculum in
we managing the standards?) explicit ways? (How are we
making connections—day to day,
week to week, unit to unit?)
3 Nested 4 Sequenced
Are we or how are we explicitly Are we or how are we aligning
nesting the life skills and standards and mapping
process standards into core curriculum for commonsense
curricular content? parallels?
5 Shared 6 Webbed
Are we or how are we collabo- Are we or how are we using
rating with other teachers to patterns and themes to
find the big ideas that we share integrate the curricula?
across the disciplines?
7 Threaded 8 Integrated
Are we or how are we threading Are we designing or how might
skills across the various content we design authentic learning
areas? projects and performances
that integrate a number of
disciplines?
9 Immersed 10 Networked
Are we or how are we Are we or how are we modeling
using learner-centered real-world learning that
models in which students utilizes networks of experts?
have choices?
1 Cellular 2 Connected
3 Nested 4 Sequenced
5 Shared 6 Webbed
7 Threaded 8 Integrated
9 Immersed 10 Networked
Before After
Statement
Agree Disagree Agree Disagree
FOUR-FOLD CONCEPT
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY
To discover the meaning behind the idea of curriculum integration, the team-
building four-fold concept development activity can help the group come to a
common understanding of the concept. In groups of two, three, or four, fold a
large piece of poster paper into four sections and label the sections as shown in the
diagram: LIST, RANK, COMPARE, ILLUSTRATE. Write “Curriculum Integration”
at the top of the paper, and follow the cues provided by the headers and label in
Figure 0.9.
First, brainstorm 10–20 synonyms of phrases for the concept of curricu-
lum integration. Then, rank the top three through discussion and place the
three words in the appropriate section. Now, think of an analogy, by finding a
tangible, concrete object, to compare to the concept of curriculum integration.
Figures 0.10–0.12 provide several examples to use to prime the pump as
you and your team think about an analogy. Look these over, and then proceed
with your analogy in the third section. Then, add the accompanying visual
metaphor or poster illustration in the last section.
INTRODUCTION 17
LIST RANK
Brainstorm 20 synonyms Prioritize the top 3
COMPARE ILLUSTRATE
Use the analogy:
_____ is like curriculum integration because both ____.
1.
2.
3.
LIST RANK
Brainstorm Synonyms, Phrases, etc. Best Ideas
Interdisciplinary Active Learning
Teamwork Relationships Interdisciplinary
COMPARE ILLUSTRATE
Integrated curriculum is like a good wine ,
because both .
1998
Admiralty Primary
Vineyard . . .
Figure 0.10
INTRODUCTION 19
CI: Curriculum Integration
LIST RANK
Brainstorm List of Synonyms, Phrases, etc. Best Ideas
Complement Making meanings
Differentiated Applying knowledge Interdisciplinary
COMPARE ILLUSTRATE
With a Visual Metaphor
Concrete Object to Curriculum Integration in an
Analogy
Integration is like shipbuilding, because both
_____________________.
Figure 0.11
20 HOW TO INTEGRATE THE CURRICULA
LIST RANK
Brainstorm Synonyms, Phrases, etc. Best Ideas
Rich Engaged learning
Student-centered
Teamwork Relationships
Interconnected Student-centered
Cross subjects/departments Connectedness
Connectedness
Prior knowledge Woven
Themes Interwoven
Threaded Laced
Coherency
Coherency Spiced
Robust
COMPARE ILLUSTRATE
With a Visual Metaphor
Concrete Object to Curriculum Integration as an
Analogy
Figures 0.12
INTRODUCTION 21
1 Cellular
Are we or how are we
setting curricular priorities?
L et’s not dismiss the traditional model too lightly. It has worked for many
years. There must be a reason it has survived the test of time.
22
MODEL 1: CELLULAR 23
has separate and distinct content standards. Although there may be overlap
between physics and chemistry, the relationship between the two is implicitly,
not explicitly, approached through the curriculum.
inherent and tailored to its field. For example, mathematicians have distinct
ways of categorizing problems, while literature aficionados glory in their vari-
ous genres. Each and every discipline offers rigor in its way of thinking about
the world, and immersion in the various disciplines has immense benefits in
rounding out the spectrum of thinking for learners of all ages.
This model, although it appears at first to be somewhat fragmented, does
indeed provide clear and discrete views of each discipline. In turn, the model
affords a particular way of thinking, through the qualities of designated dis-
ciplines, that enhances the perspectives of learning. In addition, experts can
easily sift out the priorities of their own subject areas as they live and
breathe with their passion for their subject matter. In the final analysis, stu-
dents are able to realize the true benefits of this cellular model when work-
ing with a mentor.
WHEN IS THIS
CELLULAR MODEL USEFUL?
The cellular model is a useful curricular configuration in a number of
cases. It works for large schools with diverse populations because these
schools may offer a variety of courses that provide a spectrum of subjects
to target special interests. It is also useful, of course, at the university level,
where students travel on specialized paths of study that require expert
knowledge for instructing, mentoring, coaching, and collaborating. This
model is also helpful in teacher education programs, as the preparation can
be more focused. And it is a good model for practicing teachers who want
to sift out curricular priorities in order to manage the abundance of con-
tent standards as they prepare cross-departmental models for interdiscipli-
nary planning.
Figures 1.1–1.3 are examples of completed cellular model integration exer-
cises, and Figure 1.4 provides the opportunity for readers to record their own
design for this model.
MODEL 1: CELLULAR 25
Model 1: Cellular
Readers’ Theater
“On My Own”
Narrator
Meanwhile, back at the school, teachers with periscopic vision are unintentionally
burying their students with homework as they individually plan their curricula . . .
To work with Model 1, the Cellular Model, think about the elements of the cur-
riculum. First, select one subject (math, science, social studies) that you teach
at the elementary level or one class prep (algebra, geometry, trigonometry) that
you have at the middle or high school level.
Once you have a focus on the subject or prep, think about the curriculum
standards addressed, and list all of the relevant topics of study for that area.
After you have listed the topics of study, think about which ones are most
important and which are least important. Then prioritize the list by numbering
the items, with 1 as most important and the highest number as least important.
This process is known as a forced ranking, but it is helpful to discern the signif-
icance of each topic.
After you have made your decisions, dialogue with a partner in the same
department or a similar grade level about the curricular priorities in that disci-
pline. Discuss how you set priorities and what considerations you make in
deciding how to weigh the various pieces of the targeted curriculum. Let your
partner comment on your list.
26 HOW TO INTEGRATE THE CURRICULA
Model 1: Cellular
Science
Model 1: Cellular
Mathematics
4 Logic/Reasoning [2]
4 Estimation [3]
Model 1: Cellular
Language Arts
4 Grammar [6]
4 Research [4]
4 Communications [5]
Model 1: Cellular
Subject/Course
List Content Rank Order
4 [ ]
4 [ ]
4 [ ]
4 [ ]
4 [ ]
4 [ ]
“I prioritize the fundamental or basic understandings first; then I look for the top-
ics, concepts, or units that can be given a different weight.”
Each teacher in each discipline plans the topics and content in isolation from the
other teachers in other disciplines. For example, the language arts teacher and the
science teacher simultaneously list their traditional topics for a semester, yet they
do so independently of the other disciplines.
This cellular model is truly the traditional way of working with curriculum, with
little or no attention to integrating the disciplines.Yet the sequence and time allot-
ment determined by each individual teacher, using individual criteria, is a necessary
step in sifting out curricular priorities. It is the first step in how teachers set about
“selectively abandoning” or “judiciously including” (Costa, 1991a, p. 65) material in
curricular design.
“In third-grade math, I prioritize mathematical operations as the fundamental or
basic understandings first; then I look at geometry and probabilities because I can
give them a different weight in the grand scheme of things.”
Model
Connected
How are we connecting
2
the curriculum in explicit ways?
31
32 HOW TO INTEGRATE THE CURRICULA
Moderator,
Follows the Heads and Articles concernyng the discipline of the Kirk to be
observit in all tyme coming.
We have now accomplished the main part of the task in which for
some months past we have been engaged, namely, to print for the
first time, in a complete and connected state, all that now remains
of the earliest record of the Reformed Church of Scotland. That
record extends from 1560 to 1616 inclusive. And as stated in
previous notes, the proceedings in the Assemblies, during the period
now referred to, constitute what has been long denominated “The
Booke of the Universall Kirk of Scotland.” The concluding part of our
undertaking still remains to be performed in such illustrative notes
and documents as are requisite for giving coherence and full effect
to these important fragments of our ecclesiastical records; and this
portion of our labours shall hereafter be prosecuted as speedily and
comprehensively as the nature of the case admits of, with a due
regard to fidelity in its accomplishment. In the meanwhile, “The
Booke,” forming of itself a volume of sufficient size, it is now given in
that shape to the public.
The reader of the preceding pages is already aware, that all the
proceedings of the Episcopal Assemblies (subsequently to that of
1602) were rescinded by the Presbyterian Conventions which took
place during the reign of Charles I. in 1638 and 1639. Even in the
proceedings of the Assemblies soon after 1592, when
Presbyterianism was established, there are various indications of the
intentions of King James VI. to insinuate Episcopacy into the
constitution of the Church; and after his accession to the throne of
England, in March 1603, his policy in this respect became more
manifest. Indeed, by an act of Parliament in 1597, (19th December,)
the insidious propositions which had been made in the Assemblies,
for the introduction of clergymen into Parliament, were given effect
to, and formed the first step in the series of encroachments on the
Presbyterian polity. Without at present going minutely into the detail
of events which followed, it may be noticed, with reference to the
rescinded acts of Assembly, that even before the Assembly of 1602,
Prelacy was virtually introduced into the Church, and after that date
it was openly established by a series of acts of Parliament. The
Assemblies of 1606, 1608, 1610, and 1616, were all Episcopalian, as
is evinced by the whole course of procedure in those Conventions,
which were one and all convoked and packed by the King, and were
held merely for the purpose of registering his edicts, and giving a
colourable aspect to these as clothed with ecclesiastical sanction.
There were two other Assemblies of like character held in the years
1617 and 1618—in the latter of which the celebrated Articles of
Perth were adopted by the Bishops and subservient Clergy; but of
the proceedings in these two Assemblies, there is no fragment in the
MS. copies of “The Booke” to which we have had access; nor,
although the nature of these proceedings is described by
Calderwood and other historians, have we been able to discover any
detailed record similar to that which has been preserved of the
preceding Assemblies of the Church. After 1618, General Assemblies
were entirely discontinued for the space of twenty years, until, in
1638, in consequence of the great revulsion which then took place in
Scotland under the guidance of the Covenanters, another General
Assembly was convoked by authority of King Charles the First.
In conformity with the course which we have already adopted with
reference to particular epochs of our Church history, and in order to
illustrate the relation which subsisted betwixt the Church and the
State, we shall now, at the close of “The Booke,” subjoin in an
Appendix the principal Acts of Parliament which were passed in
regard to the Church, betwixt 1592 and 1638, when Presbyterianism
was re-established—thus presenting, in connexion with the Acts of
the Church, all the leading statutory enactments of the State by
which the Church polity was established, modified, and subverted,
during a period of seventy-eight years. And with these few
explanatory remarks, we commit “The Booke of the Kirk” into the
hands of our countrymen, being well assured that its pages contain
much important matter, which merits careful examination and study
at the present day.
July 1839.