Sarawak Campus

Faculty of Engineering, Computing and Science

Higher Education Division

CEE20004 Process Safety and

Sustainability

Team Work Evaluation

Due Date: 4th December 2020
Submission Format: Softcopy on Canvas
Weighting: 5% of the total subject’s mark
Individual/Group Task: Individual

Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO) assess in this assignment:

ULO 4: Work individually and in a team to analyze, interpret, and address
problems in safety and sustainability assessment.

Complete the below team work evaluation forms. This evaluation is confidential and should
not be discuss with other team members. An example on how to fill the form is given in
page 6 and 7.

Student will get 0 mark if this assessment is not submitted. Student marks will be deducted
accordingly if the form is fill incorrectly.

The convener reserves the right to change the rating/vary the marks if there are strong
evidence confirming the statement.

The convener reserves the right to vary the marks of the assessment(s) in this unit involving
group work according to the finding of this team work evaluation (individual contribution of
the members)

Name Xavier Liao Zhe

Student ID 102780977

1
Assessment declaration (for Electronic Submissions)

Declaration and Statement of Authorship

1. I/we have not impersonated, or allowed myself/ourselves to be impersonated by any person
for the purposes of this assessment.
2. This assessment is my/our original work and no part of it has been copied from any other
source except where due acknowledgement is made.
3. No part of this assessment has been written for me/us by any other person except where
such collaboration has been authorised by the lecturer/teacher concerned.
4. I/we have not previously submitted this work for this or any other course/unit.
5. I/we give permission for my/our assessment response to be reproduced, communicated,
compared and archived for plagiarism detection, benchmarking or educational purposes.

I/we understand that:

 Plagiarism is the presentation of another person's work as though it is your own. It is a form
of cheating and is a very serious academic offence that may lead to exclusion from the
university.
 Plagiarised material may be drawn from published and unpublished written documents,
interpretations, computer software, designs, music, sounds, images, photographs, and ideas
or ideological frameworks gained through working with another person or in a group.
 Plagiarised material can be drawn from, and presented in, written, graphic and visual form,
including electronic data and oral presentations. Plagiarism occurs when the origin of the
material used is not appropriately cited.

I/We agree and acknowledge that:

1. I/we have read and understood the Declaration and Statement of Authorship above.
2. I/we accept that use of my/our Swinburne account to electronically submit this assessment
constitutes my/our agreement to the Declaration and Statement of Authorship.
3. If I/we do not agree to the Declaration and Statement of Authorship in this context, the
assessment outcome may not be valid for assessment purposes and may not be included in
my/our aggregate score for this unit.

Penalties for plagiarism range from a formal caution to expulsion from the university, and are
detailed in the Plagiarism and Misconduct webpage.

Group Members 1 Darren Kuang Neng PANG

2 Mandy Jia Yi CHUA
3 Biolyni ANAK BUJENG
4 Homawatte Rashmi Dinusha Parami RANASINGHE

2
Part 1: CATEGORIZE each member according to the criteria below.

Unacceptable Marginal Acceptable G

Criteria
Ability to interact and Unable to work and Able to work but with Able to work and make Work well
work effectively with refuse to interact with less interaction with interaction with interaction
other to achieve mutual others others. others. group mem
objective
Specify member no. 3,4
Ability to contribute Not engaged in the Engages team Engages team Engages te
ideas, engage and teamwork activity, members by members in ways that members i
respect other opinion inattentive, disruptive commenting on the facilitate their facilitate th
and contribution or lack focus and/or contributions of others contributions by asking contributio
dismissive of Shares ideas but does probing/meaningful synthesizin
contribution of other not advance the work questions. contributio
team members. of the group. Offers new suggestions offering alt
Rarely shares ideas to advance the work of solutions.
and/or contributions the group.
are ill informed and
not constructive or
relevant.
Specify member no. 3 4
Organizational ability and Unprepared, unaware Somewhat prepared Prepared and able to Well prepa
individual contribution and uninformed with some attention to stay on task; time focussed o
on team work regarding team tasks; time management. management skills accomplish
wastes time. Completes all assigned adequate. Completes effective u
Fails to complete all tasks by deadline with all assigned tasks by time. Comp
assigned tasks by poor quality. deadline; assigned ta
deadline and with poor work accomplished deadline;
quality. advances the project. work accom
thorough,
comprehen
advances t
Shows initi
volunteers
additional

Specify member no. 3,4

Part 2: RANK the member performance in term of the criteria from 1 (high performance) to 4
(lowest performance).

Criteria Member 1 Member 2 Member 3

Ability to interact and work effectively with other to achieve mutual 2 1 4
objective
Ability to contribute ideas, engage and respect other opinion and 2 1 4
contribution
Organizational ability and individual contribution on team work 2 1 4

3
Part 3: Give other comment/issue regarding each member contribution and team work skill.
(Optional)

Other Comment / Issue

Member 1 Good teammate overall which attends all the classes where we have our group discussion
Member 2 Best teammate overall which helps keeps us in check
Member 3 Not so active in participants during discussion and just do the work without consulting us. Least amoun
groupmates.
Member 4 An okay groupmate that does her work, is kinda time efficient based on the deadline, communication b

Example
Group Members 1 ABC
2 DEF
3 GHI
4 JKL

Part 1: CATEGORIZE member according to the criteria below.

Unacceptable Marginal Acceptable G

Criteria
Ability to interact and Unable to work and Able to work but with Able to work and make Work well
work effectively with refuse to interact with less interaction with interaction with interaction
other to achieve mutual others others. others. group mem
objective
Specify member no. 2,4 1
Ability to contribute Not engaged in the Engages team Engages team Engages te
ideas, engage and teamwork activity, members by members in ways that members i
respect other opinion inattentive, disruptive commenting on the facilitate their facilitate th
and contribution or lack focus and/or contributions of others contributions by asking contributio
dismissive of Shares ideas but does probing/meaningful synthesizin
contribution of other not advance the work questions. contributio
team members. of the group. Offers new suggestions offering alt
Rarely shares ideas to advance the work of solutions.
and/or contributions the group.
are ill informed and
not constructive or
relevant.
Specify member no. 4 1,2,3
Organizational ability and Unprepared, unaware Somewhat prepared Prepared and able to Well prepa
individual contribution and uninformed with some attention to stay on task; time focussed o
on team work regarding team tasks; time management. management skills accomplish
wastes time. Completes all assigned adequate. Completes effective u
Fails to complete all tasks by deadline with all assigned tasks by time. Comp
assigned tasks by poor quality. deadline; assigned ta
deadline and with poor work accomplished deadline;
quality. advances the project. work accom
thorough,
comprehen

4
 advances t
Shows initi
volunteers
additional

Specify member no. 4 3 1,2

Part 2: RANK the member performance in term of the criteria from 1 (high performance) to 4
(lowest performance).

Criteria Member 1 Member 2 Member 3

Ability to interact and work effectively with other to achieve mutual 1 2 3
objective
Ability to contribute ideas, engage and respect other opinion and 2 1 4
contribution
Organizational ability and individual contribution on team work 1 3 4

Part 3: Give other comment/issue regarding each member contribution and team work skill.
(Optional)

Other Comment / Issue

Member 1
Member 2
Member 3
Member 4 Did not attend meeting and discussion.