Quiz 2 Final
Quiz 2 Final
402)
Monsoon 2024
General Instructions
● Read all instructions and questions carefully before answering.
● Important: If your answer involves assumptions, be sure to clarify them for a complete
understanding of your answer.
● If you perceive a question as confusing or open to interpretation, you're allowed to make
reasonable assumptions; please specify these in your answer.
● There can be multiple options correct for MCQs, where the marking will be done as
follows:
○ Any wrong option marked - 0 marks
○ All correct options marked - 1 marks
○ Any other permutation combination - 0 marks
2. What sort of skew is present in a distribution that has the following characteristics?
Mean = 50, Median = 60 and Mode = 70
a. Negative Skew
b. Positive Skew
c. Normal / No Skew.
4. Which of the following experiments can be conducted online without being affected by
hardware and software constraints in web-based experiments and design?
a. Stroop Task: Measures the time it takes for participants to correctly identify the
colour of a word while ignoring the word’s meaning
b. Survey: Measure the big five personality traits: Openness to Experience,
Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism
c. Dot Motion Coherence Task: Measures participants’ ability to detect coherent
motion in a visual field containing both randomly moving dots and dots moving in
a specific direction
d. Word List Memory Task: Measures participants’ short-term memory and
recognition ability by presenting them with a list of words and later testing their
ability to recall or recognise them
5. Which of the following statement(s) is/are true concerning interquartile ranges (IQR)?
a. Provides information about the spread of the central portion of the data
b. Provides information on the typical distance of data points from the mean
c. It is not affected by outliers or extreme values
d. It is affected by outliers or extreme values
1. Can you identify a principle for distinguishing legitimate from illegitimate instances of
data omission? That is, when is it acceptable to ignore a specific observation?
2. Describe two opportunities of scientific misconduct which arise as symptoms of the
structure of science along with an example.
3. What does it mean to standardise a normal distribution and how would you go about
doing it? What advantages does the process of standardisation allow for?
4. A data set has a set of seven scores of which one score is 0.8. The standard deviation
for the set is 0. Can you give the mean of the set and say anything else about the six
other scores in the set?
5. The following values represent the scores of students in a test (out of 10)
0 3
1 6
2 10
3 5
4 4
5 3
6 2
7 4
8 8
9 5
10 3
Draw a histogram representative of the above data and talk about the skew
characteristics of the distribution.
1. You have time travelled back to the dreaded times of COVID19 (for some reason) and
you are required to conduct an experiment. However, due to the entire world being under
lockdown, you are forced to conduct your experiments online. Define and label three
hardware and software constraints you would have to keep in mind so that your data is
not confounded.
2. What are the three different flows of research? Describe, within each, a possibility where
ethical issues might arise.
3. In 1939, Wendell Johnson, a speech pathologist at the University of Iowa, and his
graduate student Mary Tudor conducted a controversial experiment now known as the
"Monster Study." The research involved 22 orphaned children, with the aim of
investigating whether stuttering is an inherent trait or a learned behaviour. The children
were divided into two groups—one receiving positive feedback for fluent speech, while
the other group was subjected to negative feedback, with some children being falsely
labelled as stutterers. This manipulation caused some of the non-stuttering children to
develop speech impediments, and they suffered emotional trauma as a result. Johnson
and Tudor justified their actions by claiming that the study would contribute valuable
insights into the causes of stuttering and that there was no physical harm, but the
experiment has since been heavily criticised for its unethical treatment of vulnerable
subjects. The "Monster Study" remains a stark reminder of the importance of ethics in
behavioural research.
Based on the context of the 1939 'Monster Study' conducted by Wendell Johnson and
Mary Tudor, explain the design of the experiment, specifying the independent and
dependent variables, as well as the methodology used to manipulate the children's
speech behaviour. Additionally, discuss the ethical implications of this study, particularly
in relation to the treatment of the participants and the long-term effects of the
manipulation.