History S5 SB
History S5 SB
Senior 5
Student’s Book
© 2024 Rwanda Basic Education Board
ii
FOREWORD
Dear Student,
Rwanda Basic Education Board is honoured to present to you this Senior 5
History Book which serves as a guide to competence-based teaching and
learning to ensure consistency and coherence in the learning of History
subject. The Rwandan educational philosophy is to ensure that you
achieve full potential at every level of education which will prepare you to
be well integrated in society and exploit employment opportunities.
iiiiii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to express my appreciation to all the people who played a major
role in the editing process of this book. It would not have been successful
without their active participation.
Special thanks go to those who gave their time to read and refine this
book to meet the needs of competence-based curriculum. I owe gratitude
to the Ministry of National Unity and Civic Engagement (MINUBUMWE),
Never Again, AEGIS Trust who provided their expertise in research and
recommendations which contributed to the edition of this guide.
Joan Murungi
Head of Department/CTLR
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWORD......................................................................................................................................... iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.............................................................................................................. iv
vv
2.3.1 Similarities.........................................................................................................................53
2.3.2 Differences.......................................................................................................................53
2.4 The Eastern Question���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 54
2.4.1 Factors for the decline of Ottoman Empire in the 19th Century.54
2.4.2 The Greek War of Independence.....................................................................56
2.4.3 The Syrian Question................................................................................................. 60
2.4.4 The Crimean War........................................................................................................63
2.5 The 1856 Paris Treaty and its impact on Europe����������������������������������������������� 68
2.5.1 The Berlin Congress of 1878.................................................................................. 69
2.5.2 Impact of the Berlin Congress on Europe...................................................71
vi
5.1.1 Evolution of new Republican institutions after Independence... 94
5.1.2 From Multipartism to Monopartism Learning........................................ 96
5.1.3 Assessment of the First Republic (1962-1973)............................................97
5.1.4 Failures of the First Republic..............................................................................103
5.1.5 Downfall of the First Republic and the 5th July 1973 coup d’état...
...........................................................................................................................................................105
5.2 The Second Republic (1973-1994)������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 107
5.2.1 The coup d’état of 5th July 1973 and establishment of the Second
Republic......................................................................................................................................107
5.2.2 Assessment of the Second Republic.......................................................... 108
5.2.3 Failures of the Second Republic...................................................................... 115
5.2.4 Downfall of the Second Republic...................................................................116
vii
vii
7.1.3 Specific objectives of Itorero ry’Igihugu ....................................................143
7.1.4 The National Itorero Commission.................................................................. 144
7.2 Urugerero (National Service)���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 145
7.3 Umuganda ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������147
7.4 Imihigo���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 149
7.41 Impact of Imihigo........................................................................................................150
7.4.2 Imihigo challenges................................................................................................... 152
7.4.3 Issues in implementation of Imihigo.......................................................... 153
7.5 Community Policing���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 154
7.5.1 The day-to-day activities of community policing initiatives ........156
7.5.2 Community policing programmes .............................................................. 157
REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................. 184
viii
UNIT 1 ORIGIN OF ISLAM AND ITS
IMPACT IN WEST AFRICA
Key unit competence: The learner should be able to explain the origin
of Islam, its role in the expansion of West African empires and its impact.
Carry out research about Islamic religion, then identify its origin and
its pillars. Prepare a summary in form of assay writing that you will
use in class presentation.
Islam was spread in Asia before being imposed on the people of North
Africa by Arabs between 639 and 708 A.D. From this region, Islam spread
to West Africa. Different methods were used to spread Islam. These
included the Trans Saharan Trade and Jihads. The spread of Islam was
influenced by religious fanatics and commercial traders.
In West Africa, jihads mainly aimed at purifying Islam and converting the
pagans. At the end of the jihads, immense regions of West Africa were
transformed into Muslim empires and were ruled according to the Sharia.
11
The word Islam means the act of submitting, or giving oneself over, to God
(Allah); the followers of Islam are called Muslims, which means believers.
Mecca, Saudi Arabia. Source: Microsoft student with Encarta Premium 2009
In 632 AD, after 10 years, Muhammad fell ill and died. He was succeeded
by a leader called Khalifa or Caliph, successor. The first Khalifa was Abu
Bakar, Muhammad’s father – in-law. The Khalifa ruled from Medina. Mecca
in Saudi Arabia became the holy city of Islam.
The Koran identifies the basic beliefs of Islam and tells how good Muslims
should live. It describes the pillars of faith, or the five duties all Muslims
must fulfill.
1. The confession of faith (shahada), “There is no god but God,
2. Muhammad is the messenger of God, Allah” (La ilala illa Allah;
Muhammadun rasulu Allah).
3. To pray five times a day while facing Mecca at dawn, noon, late
afternoon, sunset and evening (salat).
4. To give charity to the poor (zakat)
5. To fast from sunrise to sunset during the holy month of Ramadhan
(sawm)
6. To do pilgrimage (hajj) to Mecca two months after Ramadhan. Every
able bodied Muslim is obliged to make pilgrimage to Mecca, at least
once in their lifetime.
For this reason, they were called the Rightly Guided Caliphs. They honoured
Muhammad’s wish to carry the word of God to other people. They did this
by fighting jihads or holy wars, against infidels or non-believers. They sent
Muslims warriors into Palestine, Syria, Iraq, Persia, Egypt, North Africa and
south Europe; and conquered them.
Danube
Tours
Europe Aral Sea
Black Sea
Atlantic Sea
Rome CaspianSea
Constantinople Samarqand
Tigris
Carthage
Damascus
Mediterranean Sea Baghdad
Eu p hra tes
Persia
Jerusalem Indus
Alexandria
Cairo
Persian
Arabia Gulf
Medina
Mecca
Nile Red
Afric a
Key Sea
Rivers
Arabian Sea
0 400km
W at er
In the 7th and 8th centuries, the religion of Islam spread through conversion
and military conquest throughout the Middle East and North Africa.
By 733, just 100 years after the death of Muhammad, the Islamic state
stretched from India in the east to Spain in the west.
Their conquest of Spain brought them into Europe. They advanced into
France where they were defeated at Tours in 732 by Charlemagne, the
king of the Franks.
Carry out research on the Koran and pillars of faith and answer the
following questions. Present the results of your findings to the class.
1. Explain each of the five pillars of Islam.
2. Identify the factors that facilitated the Arabs to be successful in
their conquest.
Islam started slowly in Arabia and later spread to other parts of the world
including the African continent. It first spread in North Africa by about the
14th century. By 1850, it had spread to most parts of West Africa through
the early trade contacts between the Arabs and the Berbers and the
Turkish occupation of North and West Africa.
Education: Muslim schools were built in West Africa and many Arab
scholars arrived to teach Islamic principles to the children of West Africa
who eventually converted to the faith.
Conversion of local leaders: Some African kings and chiefs who joined
Islam encouraged their subjects to convert. Those who got interested in
leadership joined Islam as a symbol of loyalty.
Jihads: Muslim fanatics declared a holy war in order to reform Islam which
was declining in the region e.g. the Fulani jihads in Hausaland, Macina,
Tukolar, and the Mandika Empire etc.
Prestige: Those who made pilgrimages to Mecca came back with wealth,
and new ideas. They were considered heroes in their communities. These
inspired others to convert in order to enjoy such status.
Oppression from African leaders: People from the Hausa states faced a
lot of oppression and brutality from their leaders. They decided to join the
jihad movements, hence they voluntarily accepted Islam faith.
Conduct research on the first five methods that were used in the
spread of Islam in West Africa. Present the results of your findings
to the class.
The first jihads in West Africa took place in Guinea in Futa Jallon in 1720s.
They were led by Ibrahim Musa. In the 1770s there was yet another jihad
in Senegal in Futa Toro led by Sulayman Bal. In 1808, Uthman Dan Fadio
started holy wars in the Hausa states (Daura, Kano, Katsina, Zaria, Rano,
Gobir and Hiram). Other West African jihadists were Seku Ahmadu of
Macina, Al Hajj Umar of Tukolor and Ahmed Bello.
Therefore, the time was right for a revolution that only needed someone
to start it. This was provided by the arrival of men filled with religious zeal
and reformist ideas and with the ability to lead and organize. For example,
Uthman Dan Fodio, Al Hajji Umar, Seku Ahmadu among others.
Along with his brother Abdullah and son Mohammed Bello, Fodio escaped
to Gudu outside Gobir.
After a prolonged fight, Yunfa’s army was defeated and he was killed
at Akolawa. Serious resistance against Fodio’s army collapsed in 1809.
Immediately, Fodio declared the Sokoto Caliphate and he became the
undisputed caliph.
Once the conquest period was over, Fodio returned to his work of writing
books since he was basically an Islamic scholar.
He divided the empire between his son and his brother. Mohammed
Bello his son was in charge of the eastern region and Abdullah his brother
the western region. Fodio died in 1817 and his son Mohammed Bello was
recognized as the caliph of the Sokoto Caliphate.
Al Hajj Umar
His growing fame and influence alarmed the Quadiriyya scholars and
Fouta Djalon political authorities. In 1851, he fled to Dinguiray.
He equipped the army with European weapons bought from the coastal
towns of West Africa. He even established a workshop of gun smiths who
could repair guns. At a later stage, Al Hajj Umar was able to manufacture
some of these arms, thus supplying his army.
After this, Umar diverted his attention against French imperialists. This
was a mistake that he would regret later. By 1863, the Tukolor Empire
extended from Futa Djalon to Timbuktu.
In February 1863, Al Hajj Umar was killed in the famous Massina uprising.
This was spear-headed by the Quadiriyya leaders who were opposed to
his Tijaniyya principles. But the empire under his eldest son and successor
Ahmadi Bin Sheikh, survived till it was over-run by the French in 1893.
Lastly, in his efforts he made the Tijaniyya sect more popular than the
Quadiriyya. Today, the Tijaniyya is more dominant in West Africa.
16
2
MAJOR EUROPEAN
UNIT EVENTS FROM 1836 TO
1878
Key unit competence: The learner should be able to evaluate the major
events that took place in Europe from 1836 to 1878; their causes, course
and the effects.
Account for the outbreak of the 1848 Revolutions. Present the results
of your research to the class.
The revolutions broke out in France, Austria, and the Italian and German
states. People rose against conservative governments and demanded for
political, social and economic reforms. Those revolutions were also against
the negative consequences of the Vienna settlement and Metternich
system.
17
Street fighting in Vienna, 1848. Austria, was the scene of some of the most
intense fighting during the revolutions of 1848 in Europe. The emperor
fled and Prince Metternich was forced to resign as foreign minister. This
painting shows the imperial forces suppressing the revolutionaries in
October 1848. (Source: www.Wikipedia.org)
The success of the 1830 Belgian revolution marked the end of the Congress
System. This provided an opportunity for the oppressed people to revolt
against their leaders.
They included Mazzini and Garibaldi of Italy, Louis Kossuth of Hungary, Von
Bismarck and Stephen Baron of Prussia and Louis Blanc and Lamartine
in France. New personalities mobilized support against the oppressive
rulers of Austria.
The poor people were affected by diseases like cholera, typhoid and
tuberculosis and died in large numbers. The leaders provided no solution
In eastern and central Europe the rapid population growth led to urban
congestion, food shortage and unemployment. The masses blamed this
on their respective governments. This led to the 1848 Revolutions.
In many states of eastern and central Europe, the rulers were corrupt and
inefficient. This compelled the masses to revolt against Louis Philippe for
instance in 1848.
Socialist ideas were initiated by Karl Marx. Socialists argued that capitalism
was responsible for unemployment, inflation and exploitation of the
employees. This encouraged the people to join the 1848 revolutions.
The French revolution of 1789 and the 1830 Belgian revolution encouraged
the outbreak of the 1848 revolutions. The oppressed people believed their
struggle would be successful like in France and in Belgium.
The French revolution had left behind strong ideas of liberty, equality
and fraternity. It had also overthrown dictatorship and bad governance in
France. Therefore, people in different European states in 1848 were guided
by those ideas and wanted to achieve what the French had witnessed in
1789.
The 1848 Revolutions took place at the same time: from January to March
1848.
All of them had an element of the French revolution of 1789: the demand
for constitutional changes.
All the revolutions failed, except in France where King Louis Philippe was
removed.
The revolutions were partly caused by the effects of natural disasters like
bad weather, epidemics, starvation and scarcity. This explains why there
were no revolutions in Britain where these natural disasters did not occur.
The revolutions except in France lacked the support of the national armies.
For instance, in Germany, Italy and Hungary the revolutionaries were not
supported by their national armies. This was due to the ignorance of
revolutionaries about the use of the army. In Italy, and Austria the soldiers
feared to participate because their kings were dictators.
Apart from Metternich, many other people were forced into exile. These
included Louis Philippe, Mazzini, Kossuth, Garibaldi, Prince Metternich
and Charles Albert. In addition, ordinary people rose to high positions.
This marked the end of privileges for the nobles and clergy in many parts
of Europe.
The 1848 Revolutions taught revolutionaries a lesson that for any revolution
to be successful it should be militarily strong instead of relying solely on
intellectual ideas.
The 1848 Revolutions were successful for a short time in some states. For
example in Hungary, Lajos Kossuth established the Hungarian republic
and a parliament at Budapest in March 1849; the Frankfurt Assembly
was established in May 1848 for the German states; in Italy, Garibaldi and
Mazzini set up a Roman republic in 1849. However, these republics were
shortly lived.
The 1848 Revolutions also led to the rise of dictatorial governments and
the politics of revenge in the countries where they failed. For example in
Hungary and Austria, the constitutional reforms were canceled. General
Haynau forced Kossuth into exile and killed many Hungarians. In Bohemia
Winschgratz killed many Czech rebels as revenge.
Good leadership: Louis Blanc and Alphonse Marie Lamartine were good
leaders who mobilized the masses and demanded for change during the
1848 Revolution in France.
Support from the army: Like during the previous revolution of 1789,
the revolutionaries in France were supported by the army. This support
encouraged the revolutionaries to succeed.
Support from the masses: Due to the poor social conditions, effects of the
bad weather and outbreak of epidemic diseases, the masses supported
the revolutionaries who promised them rapid reforms.
Nationalism and unity: Like in 1789, the people were strongly united.
They were determined to overthrow Louis Philippe who had become
unpopular.
Financial support from the middle class: Due to the economic problems
France was facing which included unemployment, low wages, inflation,
corruption and embezzlement of public funds, the middle class preferred
to support the revolutionaries who promised better conditions.
The revolutions were not supported by the peasants and lacked foreign
support because most countries were facing the same situation.
Austria had a song army led by efficient army commanders like General
Windschgratz who defeated revolutionaries in Vienna and Hungary, and
Raditsky who defeated the Italian revolutionaries at Novaro and Custozza.
Before 1815, Italians were under the control of Austria. In 1805, Napoleon I
forced Austria out of Italy in the famous “Italian Campaign”. He divided the
Italian states in three parts: the kingdom of Italy in the north, kingdom of
Naples in the south and central Italian states. Many Italians had admired
Napoleon for his victories over the Austrians, and for the republican
ideas that took root in the parts of Italy under French control during the
Napoleonic wars.
After the defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte in 1815, the Italian states had high
hopes for regaining their independence and freedom. However, by the
Vienna Settlement these Italian states were put under foreign domination
as follows:
• Lombardy, Venetia, Parma, Modena and Tuscany under Austria.
• Papal states under Pope Pius IX.
The Italian nationals hated foreign domination and they started several
nationalistic movements. In 1820, a secret society called Carbonari
Movement was formed by Giuseppe Mazzini. He believed that Italy should
not only be independent, but also a united republic.
Giuseppe Mazzini (June 22, 1805 up to March 10, 1872). (Source:https:// prabook.com/web/
giuseppe. mazzini/3733181#gallery)
However, due to the lack of massive mobilization, the movement failed
to unify Italy before 1850. Even the 1848 revolutionaries failed to unify the
Italian states until 1871.
Factors that had delayed the Italian Unification before 1850
Several obstacles explain why the Italian unification failed before 1850.
Austria and Metternich system: Austria had a very large, well trained,
organized and equipped army which was effectively commanded.
Metternich had established a strong spy network, and used a policy of
divide and rule. The Italians were not militarily strong by 1848 and that is
Problem of Pope Pius IX: Pope Pius IX did not have the vision of a united
Italy. He was greatly opposed to the unification of Italy because he did not
want the two Catholic countries to go to war. However, he had encouraged
liberalism and nationalism to grow throughout the Italian peninsula.
High level of illiteracy: About 90 per cent of Italians were not educated
and therefore had no political ideas which made it difficult for the masses
to understand the struggle for unification. This is why, the struggle for
unification only took place around urban areas as the rural people were
not actively involved.
Military weaknesses: The Italians were militarily weak; they lacked good
weapons, military leaders, military bases and good military tactics.
Anti-reform leaders: The leaders who led the different stages during the
early days of the unification never wanted to support the struggle for the
unification. In addition, some Italian kings collaborated with Austrian
rulers to persecute Italian nationalists who wanted unification.
Violet methods: The leaders of the unification process used a lot of force
to achieve their goal. This forced Austrian rulers to also react violently. The
use of violence scared away many Italians who supported the unification
struggle. This weakened the Italian struggle.
Factors that facilitated the Italian Unification Process of 1850-1870
The unification of Italy which was finally completed in 1871 was as a result
of a number of factors. These factors include:
The 1870-1871 Franco-Prussian War: During this war, Napoleon III was
forced to withdraw the French troops from Rome in 1870. This enabled
the Italian patriots to take over Rome and this marked the completion of
the Italian unification in 1871.
Role of Pope Pius IX: Pope Pius IX rose to power in 1848 and unlike Pope
Grégoire he was a liberal. He supported liberalism and nationalism and
liked the idea of Italian unification. It also weakened Metternich who was
an obstacle to unification.
Giuseppe Mazzini (22 June 1805 10 March 1872), nicknamed “The Beating
Heart of Italy”, was an Italian politician, journalist and activist for the
unification of Italy.
His efforts helped create the independent and unified Italy composed of
several separate states that had been dominated by foreign powers.
Exiled, he founded the Young Italy Movement (La Giovine Italia) in Marseille,
France, in July 1831. It established branches in many Italian cities. Mazzini
argued that through coordinated uprisings, the people could drive the
He used propaganda to mobilize and sensitize the Italians. This is why they
called him a “Prophet of the Italian unification”. By 1833 his movement
had about 60,000 members.
The high point of Mazzini’s career was the revolutions of 1848-49, when
he returned to Italy and was elected one of the leaders of the new Roman
republic. But when the republic fell in July 1849 to an invading French
army, Mazzini once again had to flee.
Mazzini came back to Italy during the wars of 1859 and 1860 but took no
pleasure in seeing the establishment in 1861 of a unified Italian kingdom
rather than a republic.
In 1862 he again joined Garibaldi during his failed attempt to free Rome.
In 1866 Venetia was ceded by France, which had obtained it from Austria
at the end of the Austro-Prussian war, to the new kingdom of Italy, which
had been created in 1861 under the Savoy monarchy. In 1867 he refused
a seat in the Italian Chamber of Deputies. He was still plotting to gain
Venice and Rome when he was jailed in Gaeta from August to October
1870 at the time King Victor Emmanuel II of Sardinia was seizing Rome.
In failing health, Mazzini retired to Pisa, where he died on March 10, 1872.
The Role Played by Giuseppe Garibaldi in Italian Unification
Giuseppe Garibaldi was born in 1807 and was an Italian patriot, soldier,
and freedom fighter who led the 19th-century movement known
as the Risorgimento. This movement sought Italian unification and
independence. The kingdom of Italy was finally established in 1861, due
in large part to Garibaldi’s leadership and military successes against
occupying European forces.
In 1848, after a long period in exile in Tunisia, Brazil, Cuba, Uruguay and
USA, Garibaldi returned to Italy. Together with Mazzini they participated
in the 1848 Revolution in the Papal States, leading to the formation of
the Roman republic where he was appointed general by the provisional
government of Milan in 1848.
In 1866, he led the Italian army against Austria the Seven Weeks War in
which Prussia defeated Austria and after which Venetia was granted to
the kingdom of Italy.
He was opposed by Victor Emmanuel, who did not want to risk war
with France, which was protecting the pope in Rome. Victor Emmanuel
defeated Garibaldi at the battle of Aspromonte on August 29, 1862. Garibaldi
was wounded and captured in that battle but was soon pardoned and
released.
In 1867 Garibaldi again raised a volunteer force with the aim of annexing
the Papal States to the kingdom of Italy. After a number of initial
engagements, he was defeated by combined papal and French forces
at the battle of Mentana on November 3, 1867. He was taken prisoner to
Varignano, near La Spezia but was held for only a short time.
Camillo Cavour August 10, 1810, up to June 6, 1861. (Source: https://www.britannica. com/
biography/Camillo-Bensoconte-di-Cavour).
Camillo Benso di Cavour, (August 10, 1810–June 6, 1861) was born in Turin.
He became the chief architect of Italian unification under Sardinian King
Victor Emmanuel II. With Cavour’s help, Victor Emmanuel was made king
of Italy in 1861 and Italy was officially unified in 1870.
A year later, he provoked that war. With the French help, Piedmont-
Sardinia defeated Austria and annexed Lombardy.
After his death on June 6, 1861, his successors completed his dream by
negotiating with Bismarck and Italy acquired Venetia in a Peace Treaty
that ended the Austro-Prussian war in 1866.
He solicited for funds from foreign powers especially from Britain and
France.
King Victor Emanuel II (14 March 1820 -9 January 1878) was the eldest son
of Charles Albert, Prince of Carignano and Maria Theresa of Austria. His
father succeeded a distant cousin as king of Sardinia in 1831.
King victor Emmanuel II encouraged all political activists who had been
exiled to come back home like Mazzini and Garibaldi and he accepted
to work with Cavour. He appointed him in 1852 as a prime minister. This
helped Cavour to introduce his domestic and foreign policies.
His foreign policy won for Piedmont foreign support and prestige.
After the withdrawal of Cavour from the struggle in 1859, Victor Emmanuel
maintained the gains of the struggle. This encouraged the central states
to join Piedmont.
He marched his troops to occupy Rome after France had withdrawn her
soldiers to go and fight in the Franco - Prussian war of 1870 – 1871.
Role of Foreign Powers
They inspired the Italians as united monarchies like Britain and France
among others.
There was neutrality of the foreign powers following the invasion and the
annexation of the Papal States (Rome).
Process of Italian unification. (Source: Microsoft student with Encarta Premium 2009)
After the 1856 Paris treaty, France delayed to assist Italians. However an
attempt by an Italian patriot called Felice Orsini to assassinate Napoleon
III, forced Napoleon III to form a military alliance with Cavour.
By this first stage, Austrian troops under Emperor Francis Joseph I had
been defeated by the French forces led by Napoleon III at the battle of
Solferino on June 24th, 1859. The Piedmontese forces commanded by
Victor Emmanuel II later had the better of the Austrians at San Martino.
The Austrians accepted to sign the armistice of Villafranca on July
12th 1859 and Piedmont annexed Milan and Lombardy. Austria left the
peninsula and there was a creation of a confederation of seven states of
northern Italy.
The revolt of the central states and their annexation to Piedmont
In December 1859, Tuscany, Parma, Modena, and the Papal States were
unified into the United Provinces of Central Italy, and, encouraged by the
British, began seeking annexation by the kingdom of Sardinia. Cavour,
who triumphantly returned to power in January 1860, wished to annex the
territories, but realized that French cooperation was necessary. Napoleon
III agreed to recognize the Piedmontese annexation in exchange for
Savoy and Nice. On March 20, 1860, the annexations occurred. Now the
kingdom of Sardinia controlled most of northern and central Italy.
Liberation of Naples and Sicily and annexation to Piedmont
Garibaldi then crossed over to the mainland and entered Naples where
he declared himself dictator of the two Sicilies, a territory that covered
Italy and the Island of Sicily.
Victor Emmanuel led the Italian army but it was defeated by the Austrian
army at the battle of Custrea on June 24. Garibaldi’s volunteers defeated
an Austrian force in the battle of Bezzecca, and moved toward Trento.
Meanwhile, Prussian Prime Minister Bismarck saw that his own ends in
the war had been achieved, and signed an armistice with Austria on July
27, 1866. Italy officially laid down its arms on August 12, 1866.
In July 1870, the Franco-Prussian war began. Napoleon III recalled his
army from Rome.
In September Victor Emmanuel took over control of Rome after the French
withdrawal. A plebiscite was held that supported annexation of Rome by
the kingdom of Italy. This marked the completion of the unification of
Italy.
The German Empire was born in 1871 after the defeat of France during the
Franco-Prussian war. It was proclaimed at the Hall of Mirrors in France by
Emperor William I and survived for 47 years under the three emperors.
These include William I who reigned from 1871 up to 1888, Emperor
Fredrick William III in 1888 and Kaiser William II who reigned from 1888
up to 1918. Bismarck was chancellor from 1871 until 1890.
Because of both the imperial and the Prussian offices that he held,
Bismarck had near complete control over domestic and foreign policy.
The office of Minister President of Prussia was temporarily separated from
that of chancellor in 1873, when Albrecht von Roon was appointed to the
former office. But by the end of the year, Roon resigned due to ill health
and Bismarck again became Minister-president.
Bismarck’s domestic and foreign policies 1871–1890
Internal policy
The policy against Catholics: The Catholics were not in good relationship
with the new German Empire because it was led by Protestant Prussia.
They wanted to teach the dogma of papal infallibility in schools while
Bismarck could not accept this.
To solve this problem, Bismarck introduced the May Law in 1873 by which
he expelled stubborn Catholics from Germany, imprisoned and killed
However, this law caused much criticism from socialists so that he was
forced to repeal it.
However, these laws failed and Bismarck was forced to withdraw them.
He introduced sickness insurance in industries, old age insurance for
workers, laws against child labour and the public employment board to
supervise the working conditions.
External policy
After the German unification with the defeat of France during the Franco-
Prussian war, the main aim of Bismarck’s foreign policy was to focus on
the isolation of France and prevent her from getting allies and preventing
a war of revenge. To do so, he implemented the following policies:
Calling of the 1878 Berlin Congress: In 1878, there was a crisis in the
Balkans resulting into potential conflicts between Britain and Austria on
one side and Russia on the other side. Bismarck who now never wanted
to lose friendship with both sides got involved and called the Berlin
congress to settle the conflict.
Formation of the Dual alliance in 1879: After the 1878 Berlin Congress,
Bismarck feared the possible alliance between Russia and France. He
concluded an agreement with Austria in 1879 known as the dual alliance.
In this triple alliance, Germany, Austria and Italy accepted to support one
another in case of war from a non-member. Again, Bismarck succeeded
in isolating France in Europe.
King William of Prussia and his prime minister, Otto von Bismarck,
brought several German states under Prussia’s leadership to form the
German Empire.
Lack of strong army: Germany didn’t have a well-trained single army for
all states to fight Austria. All states except Prussia never had an army and
even the Prussian army was too weak to challenge Austrians. This delayed
German’s unification.
Lack of foreign support: The Germans did not get external support
like the Italians and this made it difficult for them to address the major
obstacle which was Austrian military strength.
Social class differences: The difference between the poor working class
and the middle class undermined the success of the German unification.
On December 15, 1848 the middle class supported Austria against the
Frankfurt parliament members who wanted a socialist revolution.
Poor mass mobilization: Before the year 1860, majority of the Germans
were not informed about the importance of the German unification
because of poor mobilization due to the lack of mass media to sensitize
the people.
Lack of good leadership: The German states agreed to unite but lacked
strong leaders who would challenge Metternich and Austria. Frederick
William IV believed in unification but he was a supporter of Austria while
leaders of other states wanted to remain independent.
The collapse of the Congress system by 1830 left Austria with no foreign
assistance to check German nationalism.
The downfall of Metternich and his system which were the greatest
obstacles in 1848 favoured unification because his successors were weak.
They were not strong enough to maintain Metternich’s regressive system.
Military reforms like increasing the Prussian army from 500,000 to 750
000 under the effective command of Von Roon and Von Moltke provided
military power to challenge Austrian control of German states.
The 1848 revolutions exposed the weaknesses of the army and disunity
as obstacles to unification. This enabled the Germans to address the
obstacles to unification.
Role of Field Marshal Von Roon and Von Moltke who commanded the
Prussian army that defeated Denmark in 1864, Austria in 1866 and France
in 1871 contributed to success of the German unification.
Through his efforts, Prussia defeated Austria at Sadowa in 1866 and this
resulted into the liberation of Holstein.
In the 1870 – 1871 Franco-Prussian war was led by Von Bismarck, Prussia
defeated France at Sedan and the German unification was officially
proclaimed at Versailles in the Hall of Mirrors.
Stages in the German Unification
German unification stages. (Source: Microsoft student with Encarta Premium, 2009)
Besides, Bismarck secretly met Napoleon III and requested him to remain
neutral in case war broke out between Austria and Prussia. Napoleon was
promised territories along River Rhine but with no written document.
Russia had insured Bismarck support because he had chased the Russian
rebels who were in Prussia.
A suitable situation for war arose in 1870, when the German Prince
Leopold of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen was offered the Spanish throne,
which had been vacant since 1868. France blocked the candidacy and
demanded assurances that no members of the House of Hohenzollern
become king of Spain. To provoke France into declaring war with Prussia,
Bismarck published the Ems Telegram, a carefully edited version of a
conversation between King Wilhelm and the French ambassador to
Prussia. This conversation had been edited so that each nation felt that its
ambassador had been disrespected, thus provoking anger on both sides
in favour of war.
France mobilized and declared war on 19 July. The German states saw
France as the aggressor. Swept up by nationalism and patriotic fanaticism,
they rallied to Prussia’s side and provided troops. The Franco-Prussian
war (1870) was a great success for Prussia. The German army under the
command of the king but controlled by Helmuth von Moltke, won victory.
France was defeated at the battle of Sedan.
2.3.1 Similarities
Both unifications had Austria as a common obstacle in their unification
struggle.
Both unifications had the Franco-Prussian war as the final event after
which they concluded the unification.
Both unifications were held and delayed by the Metternich system where
it was not possible to organize revolutions.
In both unifications, there was one state that led the struggle. That was
Piedmont in Italy and Prussia in German.
In both unifications there was one outstanding leader who played a big
role, Cavour in Italy and Bismarck in Germany.
2.3.2 Differences
While the unification of Italy was achieved mainly through foreign
assistance, that of Germany was achieved by the military strength of the
Prussian army.
The sensitivity of the pope’s position, which was an obstacle in the Italian
unification was absent in the German Unification.
The Italian Unification struggle took a long time (1859 – 1871) while the
German Unification struggle took a shorter time (1864 – 1871).
The Italian Unification was achieved at the expense of some Italian states
like Nice which was given to France while no German state was lost during
unification efforts.
Analyze the factors that led to the decline of the Ottoman Empire in
1820s. Present your work to the class.
From the 14th century, Turkey became aggressive and conquered a large
area that included part of North Africa (Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Algeria
Most of these were Christians under Muslim rule. They took advantage of
internal administrative problems to demand for their independence.
At the height of its power (1683), the Ottoman Empire controlled territory in the Near East
Middle East, and North Africa, as well as central and southeastern Europe. (Source: Microsoft
student with Encarta Premium 2009)
The Eastern Question started with the decline of the Ottoman Empire
and this decline was due to the following factors:
Big size: The Ottoman Empire had become too large to be effectively
controlled by one administration based at Constantinople. This encouraged
the captured states to break away and get their independence.
Decline of military strength: The Empire had lost its military strength by
the end of the 18th century. That was why revolts like the 1821 Greek war
of independence were successful.
Presence of powerful rival states: The interests of the big powers also
contributed to the collapse of the Turkish Empire. Britain competed with
Turkey in international trade while Austria and France were opposed to
the influence of Turkey over the many states that it controlled.
Weak leaders: After its expansion to the Middle East, the Ottoman Empire
was ruled by weak sultans such as Muhammad and Abdul Al Majid.
Greek ancient glory: The Greeks are credited with the beginning of
modern civilization. They believed in their superiority over the Turkish
colonial masters. They revolted against Turkey in order to revive their
ancient glory.
Level of literacy: Greece was the most civilized of Turkey’s colonies. The
Greeks were well educated. Because of their education, they were able to
organize a rebellion against the Turkey.
However, this revolt failed due to poor organization and lack of full
support from Wallachia. The result was that Ypsilantis was defeated and
fled to Austria where he was imprisoned for seven years by Metternich.
Meanwhile, the Greeks massacred about 25,000 Muslims. The sultan of
Turkey retaliated by massacring about 30,000 Greeks and hanged Bishop
Gregorios in Constantinople on Easter Day.
Muhammad Ali, the sultan of Egypt (1769 –1849). (Source: https://military.wikia.org/ wiki/
Muhammad_Ali_of_Egypt)
The Greeks embarked on serious civil war that the Turks failed to suppress.
In 1824, the sultan, overwhelmed by the continued Greek resistance and
the threat of Russian intervention, requested Muhammad Ali of Egypt for
military assistance. He sent an Egyptian army under the command of his
son Ibrahim Pasha. The army conquered Greece from the Greeks in 1824.
He headed to Morea, killing many Christians. This temporarily stopped
the Greek revolt and it seemed a success for Turkey.
Despite protests from Austria and Prussia which sympathized with Turkey,
Britain, France and Russia signed a treaty with Turkey in which Greece
was granted self-rule, but under the Turkish over-lordship. This treaty,
however, insured that force had to be applied if Turkey failed to accept
the terms. Turkey refused to accept these terms expecting support from
Prussia and Austria.
The Greeks got their independence in 1832. The Greeks together with the
French and the British defeated the Turks at the battle of Navarino Bay in
1827 and in 1832 Greek independence was declared.
The war forced the sultan of Turkey to get conditional support from Egypt.
It was agreed that at the end of the war Egypt was to be rewarded with
Syria.
It contributed to the decline of Turkey and that was why Tsar Nicholas of
Russia referred to Turkey as “a sick man of Europe”.
It led to the Syrian question which was a result of sultan’s failure to reward
Mohamed Ali of Egypt for his assistance against the Greeks. This forced
Mohamed Ali to occupy Syria by force. This led to war between Turkey and
Egypt.
The Greek war increased the rise of nationalism in Turkey. The success
The war led to the collapse of the Congress system. When the European
powers met at Verona in 1822 and at Saint Petersburg in 1825, they were
divided over the Greek war. Russia, France and Britain supported the
Greeks while Austria and Prussia supported the Turks.
The Greek War of Independence: This war forced the sultan of Turkey,
Mahmud II to request Egypt in 1822 to support him to suppress the Greek
revolt in Morea. He promised him some territories as reward for this
assistance. This is how Muhammad Ali Pasha of Egypt got involved in the
Balkan affairs, leading to conflicts with sultan in Syria.
This was confirmed by the treaty of Unkiar Skellessi of July 1833. This
treaty placed the Ottoman Empire under the exclusive protection of the
Russians. This allowed them to dominate the straits of Bosporus and
Dardanelles. Britain, wanted to nullify any Russian gains, by seeking to
internationalize the straits.
Russia influenced the sultan to include a secret clause in the treaty which
stated that the straits of Bosporus and Dardanelles would be closed in
times of war to all ships except those of Russia. Thus Russia militarily and
politically benefited to the disappointment of other European powers.
On June 29, 1839 an invading Ottoman army was again destroyed in Syria
by Muhammad’s general, Ibrahim Pasha at the battle of Nezib, putting
him in possession of the whole of Syria. This threatened to place Istanbul
and the entire eastern Mediterranean under his control. After the battle,
the Ottoman fleet defected to Muhammad Ali. Britain, Russia and Austria
promised to support the Ottoman Empire and to force Muhammad Ali
(who had the support of France and Spain) to withdraw from Syria. Britain,
Russia, France and Prussia signed the Straits Convention of London in
1841 by which the Syrian question was settled.
Russia and France lost in the Syrian question and they were not to disturb
Europe again. The situation remained calm and there was no war in the
region up to 1853 when the Crimean war broke out in the Balkan region.
Big powers intervention in the Balkans: This was when those big powers
come as saviors, because Russia wanted to protect Constantinople while
France and Britain wanted to stop Russia from dominating the Balkans.
Poor relations between Egypt, France and Britain, Russia, Austria and
Prussia: The expulsion of France and Egypt by big powers from Syria in
1841 after signing the Straits Convention, caused tension among European
powers.
Hatred between Egypt and Turkey: The two countries never reconciled
until Turkey totally disintegrated in 1914.
The war was part of a long-running contest between the major European
powers for influence over territories of the declining Ottoman Empire.
Most of the conflict took place in the Crimean peninsula, but there were
smaller campaigns in western Anatolia, Caucasus, the Baltic Sea, the
Pacific Ocean and the White Sea.
The Crimean War is known for the logistical and tactical errors during
the land campaign on both sides (the naval side saw a successful allied
campaign which eliminated most of the ships of the Russian navy in the
Black Sea). Nonetheless, it is sometimes considered to be one of the first
modern wars as it “introduced technical changes which affected the
future course of warfare,” including the first tactical use of railways and the
electric telegraph. It is also famous for the work of Florence Nightingale
and Mary Seacole, who pioneered modern nursing practices while caring
for wounded British soldiers.
Napoleon III of France: He wanted to revenge for his uncle’s defeat in the
1812 Moscow campaign and this led to the Crimean war where France got
a chance of fighting with Russia in 1854.
The collapse of the Congress system: The idea of the congress system
was promoted by Metternich. However, the 1830 and 1848 revolutions
led to the fall of Metternich and eventually the collapse of the congress
system. European matters could no longer be diplomatically solved and
that is why the conflict among European powers ended in war.
The Sinope massacre 1853: It was the most immediate event that led
to the Crimean war. When Turkey declared war on Russia, she reacted
by bombing a Turkish warship at Sinope, a Turkish province, in the Black
Sea, killing many Turks on board. This attracted France and Britain to help
Turkey by declaring war on Russia in March 1854.
Course of the Crimean War
The Danube campaign was opened when the Russians occupied the
Danubian principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia in May 1853, bringing
their forces to the north bank of the river Danube. In response, the
Ottoman Empire also moved their forces up to the river. This established
monopolies at Vidin in the west, and Silistra, in the east, near the mouth
of the Danube.
The failure of the British and French to follow up the battle of Balaclava led
directly to another and much more bloody battle-the battle of Inkerman.
On November 5, 1854, the Russians attempted to raise the siege at
In August the Russians again attacked the base at Balaclava. The resulting
battle of Tchernaya was a defeat for the Russians, who suffered heavy
casualties. September saw the final assault. On 5th September another
bombardment was followed by an assault on 8th September resulting in
the capture of Malakoff by the French, and the collapse of the Russian
defenses. The city fell on 9th September 1855, after about a year-long siege.
At this point both sides were exhausted, and there were no further military
operations in the Crimea before the onset of winter. In 1856, the Crimean
war ended with the signing of the Paris Peace Treaty between Russia and
the allied powers.
Effects of the Crimean War
The war and the treaty had political, social and economic effects on
Europe.
The Russian revolution of 1917 broke out because the Tsar’s regime
became unpopular due to the defeat.
The war led Alexander II the successor of Nicholas I to start off efforts
to overcome Russia’s backwardness so as to achieve high levels of
development like other European powers, especially in agriculture and
industry.
The Italian unification efforts were boosted because Cavour was able to
get assistance from France that helped in the liberation of Lombardy.
Free navigation on big waters like Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and
Danube River was guaranteed as a result of this war.
The war led to the manufacture and use of more sophisticated weapons
that were to be used during the World War II.
Because of siding with Russia, Austria lost the support of France and
Britain and this paved the way for the unification of Germany and Italy.
The war attracted visitors from different parts of Europe. This changed
the outlook towards political and social life in Turkey.
The Paris Peace Treaty of 1856 was a document that concluded the
Crimean war of 1854–1856. It was signed by France, Britain, Turkey and
Russia under the chairmanship of Napoleon III of France. It had the
following impact on Europe.
The Paris Peace Treaty ensured the integrity and independence of the
Turkish Empire and admitted Turkey to the concert of Europe.
The Paris Peace Treaty also revised the Straits Convention of 1841 declaring
the Black Sea neutral. It also made territorial adjustments by giving
Bessarabia to Moldavia from Russia.
The treaty recognized Italy and Italy got support for her unification.
The treaty humiliated Russia following her territorial losses and worsened
relations between the European powers with Russia.
The discussion of the European diplomats at Paris Congress (25th February up to 30th March,
1856). (Source: https://www.napoleon.org/en/history-of-the-two-empires/paintings/the-
congress-of-paris-25february-30-march-1856/)
The European power delegates at Berlin (June 13, 1878–July 13, 1878). (Source: https://www.
newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Congress_ of Berlin)
After winning the Russo-Turkish war, Russia by the San Stefano treaty
of 1878 imposed extremely severe terms on the Ottoman Empire. Other
European powers, notably Austria-Hungary and Britain, were alarmed at
the growth of Russia’s power and of the independent states created in the
Balkans by the treaty. Concerned for their own interests in the Middle East,
they insisted that the treaty be modified. Count Gyula Andrássy, foreign
minister of Austria-Hungary, invited the European powers concerned to
meet at Berlin.
Reasons for the calling of Berlin Congress
The failure of the Paris Peace Treaty of 1856 to settle revolts within the
Balkans forced Otto Von Bismarck to organize the Berlin Congress in 1878.
Russian interests in the Ottoman Empire and the signing of the treaty of
San Stefano in 1878 contributed to the calling of the congress.
There was need to settle territorial disputes among the European powers;
for example, those between Russia, Turkey and Austria in the Balkans.
The congress was aimed at saving the Ottoman Empire from disintegrating
as a result of Russia’s imperialism.
The congress was also called to address the commercial rivalry between
Russia, Britain and Russian imperialism which threatened Britain’s trade.
France was given Tunisia in North Africa to compensate her for the loss of
Alsace and Loraine during the 1870–1871 Franco-Prussian war.
The congress forced the Turkish sultan to promise better treatment to his
Christian subjects.
The San Stefano treaty which was imposed on Turkey by Russia in March
1878 was brought to an end in order to save the Ottoman Empire from
disintegrating.
Otto Von Bismarck who chaired the Berlin Congress gained international
influence as a peace loving figure.
Italy lost her territory of Tunisia in North Africa which was handed over to
France.
It greatly led to the outbreak of the 1912–1913 Balkan wars which left a lot
of damages in central Europe.
The Balkan wars broke out in two phases; the first in 1912 and the second in
1913. The first were organized by the Balkan Christians in mainly Bulgaria,
Serbia, Montenegro and Greece against the oppressive policies of the
Turkish Sultan. The second broke out mainly due to conflicts among the
Christian states over sharing the disintegrating Ottoman Empire.
1. Evaluate the reasons that led to the calling of the 1878 Berlin
Conference.
2. Assess the impact of the 1878 Berlin Conference on European
affairs. Present your work to the class.
74
By the early twentieth century, however, much of Africa, except Ethiopia
and Liberia, had been colonized by European powers. European imperialists
push into Africa was motivated by three main factors: economic, political,
and social.
75
The Scramble for Africa
Thus it was the economic, political, and social factors and forces that led
to the scramble for Africa and the attempts by European commercial,
military, and political agents to declare and establish control in different
parts of Africa through commercial competition, the declaration of
exclusive claims to particular territories for trade, the imposition of
tariffs against other European traders, and claims to exclusive control of
waterways and commercial routes in different parts of Africa.
This scramble was so intense that there were fears that it could lead to
inter-imperialist conflicts and even wars. To prevent this, the German
chancellor Otto von Bismarck convened a diplomatic summit of European
powers in the late nineteenth century. This was the Berlin Conference,
held from November 1884 to February 1885. The conference produced a
treaty known as the Berlin Act, with provisions to guide the conduct of
the European inter-imperialist competition in Africa. Some of its major
articles were as follows:
• Notification (notifying) other powers of a territorial annexation.
• Effective occupation
• Freedom of trade in the Congo basin
• Freedom of navigation on the Niger and Congo Rivers
• Freedom of trade to all nations
• Suppression of slave trade by land and sea
This treaty, drawn up without African participation, provided the basis for
the subsequent partition, invasion, and colonization of Africa by various
European powers.
To resettle high population from Europe and provide them with jobs
The need to settle the unemployed, criminals and people who were
suffering from chronic diseases and undesirable in Europe forced
European countries to get lands to settle them in Africa. E.g. Occupation
of Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco and South Africa respectively by the French
and the British.
Humanitarian factors
Humanitarians in Europe urged their countries to occupy territory in
Africa to stop slave trade and improve the way of living for Africans.
To meet the primary demand for colonization of Africa, cash crop growing
had to be boosted. Some crops like rubber were grown traditionally, some
were grown such as pyrethrum by Europeans while others like coffee and
cotton were grown by Africans under the supervision of Europeans. These
cash crops were needed to supply raw material to industries in Europe.
In Senegal, the French never set up any industries to the extent that
The colonial education system produced people who liked European ways
of life. As a result they exploited fellow Africans. In Rwanda, education was
exclusively given to the sons of chiefs. In French, Portuguese and Italian
colonies education was used for assimilation purposes.
Liberal subjects such as, political science, literature and history were
neglected in order to keep Africans away from forming revolutionary
movements against colonialists. To colonialists, the best subjects fit for
Africans were bible study, reading and writing of languages.
The colonial powers used forced labour in the exploitation of Africa. This
economic policy was introduced in order to exploit Africa. All adults
were subjected to forced labour. Those who failed to accomplish it were
punished. Africans were also beaten or had their properties confiscated.
The over dependence of the African economy was due to poor colonial
economic policy. This policy discouraged industrialization and also
By 1900 most of Africa had been colonized by European powers. After the
conquest of African states, the European powers set about establishing
colonial state systems.
Key unit competence: The learner should be able to assess the political,
economic and social transformations brought by the colonial rule in
Africa.
During the 19th century and early 20th century, imperialism started
in Europe as a result of industrialization in order to sustain economic
prosperity. Protectionist policies in many countries limited the markets
and the demand for manufactured products.
86
Colonialism aimed at the economic exploitation of colonized nations
to benefit the mother country. As colonial states began controlling the
economy of the colonized territory, the economic interests of the colonized
were ignored. Instead, colonialists wanted to maximize their profits and
gains, regardless of the consequences on the colonized areas. In most
cases, the colonial economic policies had negative effects.
In order to have a common understanding of the aims of colonial powers in
Africa, the definitions colonialism and capitalism are essential.
The fundamental decisions affecting the lives of the colonized people are
made and implemented by the colonial rulers in pursuit of interests that
are often defined in a distant capital. Rejecting cultural compromises
with the colonized population, the colonizers are convinced of their own
superiority and of their mandate to rule.
This definition shows that capitalism is a system in which only those with
the rights to capital and machinery can produce for the whole society
while the rest of the people who have no business skills or interests
remain dependent on the owners of capital who decide on the fate of the
lives of the masses. This is the same as colonialism whereby the political,
social and economic powers are in the hands of the minority colonial
administrators.
87
to resources for export, typically to the mother country. This category
includes trading posts as well as larger colonies where colonists would
constitute much of the political and economic administration. However
they rely on indigenous resources for labour and material. Prior to the
end of the slave trade and widespread abolition, when indigenous labour
was unavailable, slaves were often imported to the Americas, first by the
Portuguese Empire, and later by the Spanish, Dutch, French and British.
Retarding of development
In colonies with centralized states and white settlement colonialism
retarded development. In centralized states colonialism not only blocked
In settler colonies, there was exploitation of the people and loss of land.
This caused the impoverishment of Africans. The evolution and spread
of technology plus the absence of slavery makes it likely that, without
colonialism, African ways of life would have slowly improved. Increase in
inequality and the racial and ethnic conflicts intensified by colonialism,
show that African countries would be better off today if they had not been
colonized. All in all, there is no country today in sub-Saharan Africa that is
more developed because it was colonized by Europeans.
From 1962 up to 1994, Rwanda was under the regime of the First and
Second republics. Through the use of different books, documents
and internet, make a research and assess the failures of those
republics. Prepare a written supporting document you will use
during the class discussion.
The First Republic worked under the November 1962 Constitution. This
means that Rwanda recovered its independence without a constitution
as such.
The text was never regarded as mandatory. As matter of fact, when the
Legislative Assembly studied a project of constitution (during its second
session), it was not about the revision questions of the Gitarama text but
a new project.
94
Therefore, in attempt to avoid a constitutional vacuum, a Parliament
shifted into a constituent Assembly and studied a constitution project of
which the final text was signed on the 24 November 1962.
It showed a clear will to break with the past by making the Republican
form of the State. In fact, Article 2 of this Constitution stipulated that “King
Kigeri V Ndahindurwa monarchy is abolished and cannot be restored”,
that “Mwami Kigeri Ndahindurwa and his entire dynasty are declared
deprived of their royal prerogatives”.
The parliament had the power to supervise the actions of the president
of the republic and his government (Article 73). Under the First Republic,
three legislatures were elected: in 1961, 1965 and 1969, until the dissolution
of the parliament following the July 5th, 1973 coup d’état.
95
The President of the Republic and the Government
Grégoire Kayibanda, President of Rwanda from October 1961 to July 1973. (Source: National
Archives of Rwanda/Photos
The Supreme Court
The Supreme Court was announced on the occasion of the 28th January
Coup d’état of Gitarama and it was to be supported by articles 98, 99
and 102 of November 1962. However, it had no real power. In fact, when
Grégoire Kayibanda changed some articles of the constitution in order
to be re-elected for the 3rd term in 1973, the judges did not react, fearing
dismissal. Putting in place new political and administrative structures.
After independence, the political and administrative structures changed
again. Territoires, Chefferies and Sous-Chefferies became Prefectures,
Sub-Prefectures and Communes respectively and headed by Prefects,
Sub Prefects and Burgomasters in that order. In this way, Rwanda was
reorganized in 10 Prefectures (Butare, Byumba, Cyangugu, Gikongoro,
Gitarama, Gisenyi, Kibuye, Kigali, Kibungo and Ruhengeri) and 143
communes.
RADER and UNAR on the other disappeared due to the killing of their
leaders. These included Prosper Bwanakweli, Ndazaro Lazare and Karinda
Callixte from RADER; and Michel Rwagasana, Afrika, Burabyo, Joseph
Rutsindintwarane, Gisimba, Mpirikanyi and Ndahiro Denis from UNAR
who were murdered in 1963. They were executed in Ruhengeri Prison
after Inyenzi launched major attacks and penetrated Bugesera up to
Kanzenze.
After recruiting some opposition leaders in its ranks and killing others,
MDR PARMEHUTU transformed itself into a single party. In 1965, MDR
PARMEHUTU was the only party which presented candidates for
presidential and legislative elections.
The first challenge faced by the First Republic was the problem of refugees.
After the Bugesera attack, many Tutsi were killed at Gikongoro prefecture
and the deaths were estimated between 8,000 and 10,000. In the same
period, Kayibanda ordered the execution of 27 leaders of UNAR and
RADER who had been imprisoned in Ruhengeri prison without any form
of legal procedure whatsoever.
“Ethnic” ideology
Independent Rwanda inherited “ethnic” ideology that would hinder
the socio-economic development of the country. Since the 1920s Ethnic
ideology was introduced by the Belgian Colonial administration in the
framework of the policy of “divide and rule”. From then onwards, the
Belgians did their best to side with one faction of Rwandans in the
administration of Rwanda.
The document known as the “Hutu Manifesto”, which was issued in March
1957, demonstrated that the colonial conception of the Rwandan society
as defined the Hutu-Tutsi divide had taken hold. Moreover, the political
parties that were created in 1959 were ethnically centered: APROSOMA
attracted almost no one except the “Hutu”; UNAR was mainly composed
of “Tutsi” conservatives; PARMEHUTU was a “Hutu” extremist political
organization.
The effect of these violence devastating for the Tutsi: their dwellings were
burned systematically, they were killed or displaced and became refugees
in neighbouring countries. They were arbitrary arrests, imprisonment and
assassinations of many Tutsi. Twenty chiefs were dismissed and 150 sub-
chiefs were replaced by members of PARMEHUTU assisted by Colonel
Logiest.
Economy
In addition, Rwanda lacked the financial means. It had only one donor:
Belgium. As a result, Rwanda was dependent on foreign donors for most
of her needs.
The country was going through an extremely difficult crisis including the
deficits in the balance of payments because in 1962 prices began to rise
drastically to reach by 50 per cent and by 1964, prices had risen by 300 per
cent. The Rwandan currency depreciated while agricultural and mineral
production declined. This resulted in a big fall in exports and a big gap in
foreign exchange.
Plans were made to construct tarmac roads linking the country to all her
neighbours in the frame-work of the five-year development plan (1966-
1971). The following roads were to be built:
• Kigali–Gatuna
• Kigali–Rusumo
• Kigali–Butare
• Ruhengeri–Cyanika
It is essential to note that before the coup d’état that brought the First
Republic in 1973 to an end, construction had only started on the Kigali-
Gatuna road in 1971. The construction of this road was completed in 1977.
In addition, the Rusumo Bridge at the Akagera River linking Rwanda and
Tanzania and the bridge over Nyabarongo River were constructed.
Attempt to get the country out of the economic crisis. The Government
of the First Republic sought international assistance from international
organizations and Western Governments. It also adopted political
austerity measures by reducing expenses in all ministries. Since 1969,
the economic situation in the country began to improve due to drastic
reduction in military expenses linked with the end of “Inyenzi” incursions
and increased assistance from Western countries. Belgium and the
International Monetary Fund had just granted Rwanda a little more in
terms of loans and the US had donated food and some money to buy
equipment.
Education system
The First Republic made very few achievements in education and health.
The First Republic tried to give free education and health services.
Health
In the health sector, the First Republic also tried to make some efforts.
The focus was put on the construction of new dispensaries whose
number increased from 67 to 142 in 1972. Steps were also taken to address
malnutrition and poor conditions of hygiene. As a remedy, some medical
centres were constructed to provide health education in order to sensitize
people on how to prevent certain diseases. Breastfeeding mothers were
provided with child care skills. The government also set up nutrition
centres for malnourished children.
The cause of rivalry was that the PARMEHUTU members of the South
especially from Gitarama, the home area of President Kayibanda tended
to systematically monopolize PARMEHUTU and Government power in a
form of nepotism at the expense of the Northern region. This resulted into
the loss of military support of which the majority of senior officers were
from the Northern region and the rest of the country. There was a failed
coup attempt by Pierre Nyatanyi who was then chief cabinet of President
Grégoire Kayibanda and Joachim Muramutsa, commander of the
Kanombe unit. The culture of impunity. The repression campaign against
Tutsi was orchestrated by the Government and local administration. There
were many deaths, arrests, burnt houses, stolen goods… Unfortunately, no
political, administrative authority or a military was tried for these atrocities.
The purges which began in February 26th 1973 were initially provoked by
students, but also encouraged and led by political authorities. Along with
PARMEHUTU, the authorities aimed at uniting the regime by defining
a common enemy. Northern soldiers (particularly Lieutenant Colonel
Alexis Kanyarengwe, the Chief of Police, who was from Ruhengeri) who,
planned to cause a political crisis, also targeted the Tutsi (“Mututsi mvira
aha”). The purges, initially involved the posting of lists of Tutsi students
and staff, asking them to leave universities and companies. This problem
later run out of control.
Different explanations are given for the source of this turmoil. Though
orders were given through the administration, they may have originated
Another cause of the rivalry between the north and the south was that
PARMEHUTU members of the south especially in Gitarama, the home
area of President Kayibanda tended to dominate PARMEHUTU and
government power at the expense of the northern region. For example,
in the last government formed by President Grégoire Kayibanda in 1972,
there were six ministers out of eighteen. One third came from Gitarama,
the region of Kayibanda. Kayibanda was accused of behaving like a
monarch who played around, and causing misunderstanding in the
government.
There was a failed coup attempt by Nyatanyi Pierre the chief of cabinet
under President Kayibanda and Muramutsa Joachim, commandant of
the Kanombe unit. Because these two officers were from the north the
coup was seen as a coup of the north against the south. The two officers
were imprisoned only to be pardoned later by President Habyarimana
when he took over power in the coup d’état of 1973.
5.1.5 Downfall of the First Republic and the 5th July 1973 coup
d’état
The first signs of the decline of the First Republic appeared in October 1968,
when a parliamentary commission of inquiry report on the administration
of the country was rejected by the majority of the members of the
parliament. This was because of interpersonal and regional differences
in the ranks of PARMEHUTU. The report had serious accusations against
President Kayibanda. The accusations in the report included favouritism
and nepotism, intimidation, misuse of political power and impunity which
characterized the political and public life of the regime.
In carrying out this plan, Tutsi children were massacred and chased
out of schools and the few Tutsi in minor administrative positions were
dismissed, and others murdered. These crimes were planned and carried
out by top ranking officials in the government. For instance, in 1972,
President Grégoire Kayibanda brought together his closest friends to
develop a diversion plan. This plan consisted in dismissing Tutsi from
schools and higher colleges as well as public, semi-public and private
institutions. Lists of “undesirable” Tutsi were posted (26-29 February
1973) and the order to leave the institution was formulated everywhere
in the same way. No prefecture was spared and all the Tutsi population
was targeted; no government official from any school, public or private
institution disapproved this act: every one kept silence. The argument that
was developed by the Government and its followers consisted in saying
that Hutu could no longer be the minority in the schools, public and
private institutions, whereas they were demographically majority. Tutsi
massacres (February-March 1973) that were prepared and coordinated by
the Kayibanda Government led to the state of insecurity that opened the
way for the 5th July 1973 Coup d’état.
5.2.1 The coup d’état of 5th July 1973 and establishment of the
Second Republic
In the night of July 4th to 5th, 1973, the presidential guard under the
general command of Major General Habyarimana, Minister of Defense
and Chief in staff of the army led a coup d’état against the regime of
Kayibanda Grégoire and Habyarimana took over the power. He was
assisted by the following senior military officers: Lieutenant Colonel Alexis
The coup leaders dissolved the National Assembly, suspended the 1962
Constitution and banned all political activities. They suppressed MDR-
PARMEHUTU Political Party, they at the same time put in place what
they called a National Peace and Unity Committee composed of 11 senior
officers to replace the ousted government. Given the state of insecurity
the country was going through before the coup d’état of 5th July 1973,
this committee was greeted with a lot of hope, even among the Rwandan
refugees.
Thus, on July 5, 1990, during his traditional July 5 speech, the day of the
Second Republic’s 17th anniversary, Juvénal Habyarimana was in position
to announce these political changes: the separation of the party bodies
Under the Second Republic, the Second Five-year period of the economic,
social and cultural development plan which covered the period from 1977
up to 1981 was implemented. This plan had four missions:
• Ensuring food security of the population and address the population
growth rate;
• Promotion of human resource management;
• Improvement of the social conditions of individuals and the
community;
• Improvement of the Rwandan position vis-à-vis external relations.
The objective of this second five-year development plan was the creation
of many jobs in order to provide young people in rural areas with
opportunities to participate in the social and economic life of the country.
From 1982 to 1986, the Third Five-year period of the economic, social and
cultural development plan was also adopted with the following aims:
• To improve food security for the population in terms of both quality
and quantity.
• To promote jobs at sustainable wage levels that cover the basic
needs while emphasizing training programmes in order to increase
labour productivity.
• To improve the population’s health conditions, promote access to
shelter and produce goods for mass consumption.
• To develop external relations and encourage the fairness of
international trade conditions.
Emphasis was also put on the creation of agricultural projects. In almost all
former prefectures, there were such projects like Développement Global
de Butare (DGB), Projet Agricole de Gitarama (PAG), Développement
Rural de Byumba (DRB) and Crête Congo Nil.
Socio-cultural evolution
Health
Under health, the Second Republic, many attempts were made to expand
the health sector. The dispensaries were transformed into health centres
and more medical personnel were trained.
In this sector, the following were the achievements of the Second Republic:
During the two years that followed the coup, the former ‘leaders’ of the
First Republic were assassinated or imprisoned. From 1974 – 1977, 58
people - individuals who were either close to Grégoire Kayibanda and
public figures of the First Republic - were assassinated upon orders from
Théoneste Lizinde, chief of security at the interior ministry. According to
some sources, the repression affected up to 700 people. Lack of freedom
of speech and press.
Beside these cases, other examples of violation of human rights are the
murder of the former chief editor of Kinyamateka newspaper, Father
Sylvio Sindambiwe and Nyiramutarambirwa Felicula, a former member
of parliament.
Economic crisis
By the end of the 1980s, the regime was becoming ineffective. The falling
price of coffee caused a severe crisis in the country and fueled discontent.
From 1986, there was a fall in the prices of coffee and tin. Coffee represented
75 per cent of the national economy.
The Rwandan Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of 330 US dollars fell to 200
US dollars in 1990. In 1989, the national social budget was reduced to 40
per cent.
This policy applied in all government institutions was a serious violation of,
especially, the right to education. This culminated into the 1994 Genocide
against the Tutsi. The policy excluded bright and gifted children just
because they were Tutsi.
Many books and movies have been produced on the 1994 Genocide
against the Tutsi. Using them, analyze the structure and strategies
that made possible the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi. Afterwards,
suggest how genocide can be prevented from happening again.
Using the Internet, search for United Nations High Commission for
Human Rights and read the whole Convention on the Prevention
and Punishment of the crime of Genocide of 9th, December 1948.
This will help you understand the international legal framework
that deals with genocides. Evaluate how this convention has been
applied in Rwanda then after, describe different steps of genocide
development.
The term ‘’genocide’’ derives from two words: A Greek word ‘genos’
meaning origin or species, and a Latin verb ‘caedere’, meaning to kill. It was
first, used by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish born American lawyer who taught
law at the University of Yale in the 1940s. He used this term ‘genocide’
uniquely to make it different from other crimes of mass killings. Generally,
it is the mass extermination of a whole group of people, an attempt to
wipe them out of existence.
122
Scientifically and legally, the definition of the term «Genocide» on
the international level, adopted by the UN Convention, has remained
substantially the same since it was initially formulated on 9th December
1948 in article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment
of the Crime of Genocide defines “genocide” as any of the following
acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part a national,
ethnical, racial or religious group, these acts were followed by a series of
characteristics of the crime of genocide, representing serious violations
of the right to life and the physical or mental integrity of members of the
group such as:
• Killing members of the group;
• Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
• Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to
bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
• Imposing measures intended to prevent births with the group;
• Forcibly transferring of the group to another group.
Delegates attending the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the crime of
Genocide of 9th, December, 1948
The Convention states that it is not just the acts of genocide themselves
that are punishable, but also “conspiracy to commit genocide,” “direct
and public incitement to commit genocide,” the “attempt to commit
genocide” and “complicity in genocide.” It is the specific intention to
destroy an identified group, either “in whole or in part”, that distinguishes
the crime of genocide from a crime against humanity. The Convention
also states that any country or state that endorsed the convention has
the rights and legal authority to request any other state that ratified the
convention to prevent against this crime of genocide. Genocide has two
123
phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group;
the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor.
The Genocidal government starts with classifying its people and divides
them in “us versus them”, telling the people that there is a certain group of
people within the country that has different origins and is distinguishable
by nationality, ethnicity, race, or religion. It tries to show to the favored
group that the targeted ones are the problem in the society and constitute
an obstacle to the social wellbeing and development of the nation.
The state usually organizes, arms and financially supports the groups
that conduct the genocidal massacres. Often militias are organized to
carry out the Genocide, in order to provide deniability to the state. The
government and powerful citizens or hate groups provide the necessary
arms, equipment, and instructions to torture and perpetrate the
Genocide. Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast and
print polarizing propaganda. Full extermination is the aim of the killing,
because the perpetrators do not believe the victims to be truly human.
1 • Classification
2 • Symbolisation
3 • Discrimination
4 • Dehumanisation
5 • Organisation
6 • Polarisation
7 • Preparation
8 • Persecution
9 • Extermination
10 • Denial
The 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi was carefully planned and executed
to annihilate Rwandan Tutsi. It was the fastest and cruelest genocide ever
recorded in human history.
It is so hard to identify the root causes of the 1994 Genocide against the
Tutsi in Rwanda. This because all Rwandans were united and shared the
elements for national cohesion like same king, clans, language, values,
same religion, culture and same country etc. However, the mainly among
others, factors had contributed to the disunity of Banyarwanda and led to
the genocide:
The loss of cultural identity
Rooted from colonial period and because of bad leadership under the
First and the Second Republics, the hatred culture was promoted and
supported by divisionism worsened by regionalism and nepotism. This
undermined the national unity among the Rwandans.
Under the two Republics, the crimes were committed with the beliefs
that the culprits will never be apprehended. Indeed, some people who
committed big and atrocious crimes were rewarded by being promoted
to important administrative positions. Corruption, favoritism, cheating,
embezzlement and diversion of public funds, suspicion and mistrust
were common.
Persecution and impunity
During the colonial period, the colonizers had favored a group of ‘Tutsi
elites’ which was associated to colonial power as auxiliaries. When their
alliance broke up in the end of 1950s, the colonizers changed alliance
from supporting the Tutsi elites in power because some elite members
of UNAR spearheaded by King Mutara III Rudahigwa were advocating for
immediate independence that provoked a break up with the Tutsi. This
change is the origin of the political and violence which happened since
November 1959 characterized by mass killings of the Tutsi and members
of UNAR party. Their houses were burned and destroyed systematically.
The same scenarios of mass killing targeting Tutsi repeated in 1963/64,
1973 and in 1990-1994 up the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi. They were
scapegoats of the failure of the government.
The authors of such massacres were never punished for the crimes
committed. On the contrary, many of them were promoted to positions of
responsibility. On the side of international community, it always considered
The genocidal ideology identified the two antagonist groups like “Us” and
“Them” or “You” and after proceeded by the nomination or qualification
of those two groups. The genocidal ideology in Rwanda is based on ideas,
attitude and practices of discrimination and hatred against the Tutsi. It
has been implemented and disseminated by the political leaders since
1959. The Tutsi most important manifestation was persecution, killing,
public hatred messages, loss of property, exclusion from political and
administrative systems, discrimination in many sectors like education,
forced exile, physical and psychological violence, etc.
Between 1990 and 1994, the Tutsi were qualified as the “enemy”, “outsiders”
and “suspected” complots. From those qualifications and propaganda,
many Newspapers and Radios, called upon all Hutu, “to kill all Tutsi before
they were killed”.
Besides the presentation of the threats against the Tutsi, another factor
was the dehumanization or qualification of enemy not as humankind
but as an animal like rats, snakes or cockroaches. The aim was to incite
public reactions against the Tutsi who were considered as a “common
enemy”. This shows that genocide crime before being an act of physical
destruction of the enemy, the genocidal ideology begins by developing
ideas of exterminating the ‘group enemy’.
Discriminatory leadership
In a meeting held on the 11th April 1994, the interim Prime Minister
Kambanda Jean called on all leaders at L’Hôtel des Diplomates in Kigali,
including Jean Baptiste Habyarimana (the only one Tutsi) the leader
of Butare Province, to apply in their respective Prefectures “Hirondelle
operation”. However, Dr. Jean Baptiste Habyarimana (Tutsi/PL/Butare
Prefecture) and Godefroid Ruzindana (Hutu/PSD/Kibungo Prefecture)
did not respond to this call and tried to unite their people and opposed
genocide until they were dismissed and killed. He also openly called for
“Insecticide operation” and what he called “the final solution” aimed at
systematic extermination of the Tutsi and their accomplices, without
“sparing neither babies, nor women, nor aged people as the insecticide
does to cockroaches. It was after this meeting that genocide spread with a
high speed throughout the whole country. It was “Apocalypse” promised
one day by Colonel Théoneste Bagosora.
The main actors and killers included soldiers of the Rwandese Armed
Forces (FAR) and Gendarmerie. In particular, the elite Presidential Guard
carried responsibility to begin killings; another group of actors was made
up of civil authorities from the top to the local authorities: members of the
former President Habyarimana’s political party (the National Revolutionary
Movement for Development (MRND) and the interim government, the
Prefects of prefectures, the Burgomasters, and the communal councilors
who basically mobilized and encouraged people to kill Tutsis.
The largest group of killers was composed of extremist Hutu. The targeted
group for extermination were the Tutsi. This was done without any
distinction of age, religion, region, etc.
With regard to the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, denial took various
forms:
• Literal denial (1994-1998) that claimed that no genocide happened
in Rwanda. It involved systematically negating the facts of genocide,
shutting up the truth and keeping silent about genocidal plans and
killings;
• Interpretative denial (1998-2003) for which the ‘drama’ of violence
was acknowledged, that it was an inter-ethnic conflict, and it was
recast as something other than genocide. Facts are twisted to deny
that the killings constituted genocide.
• Implicatory genocide denial (2003 to date) that acknowledges
that genocide took place, but involves explicit counter-accusations
to blame the ‘other side’, claiming a double genocide (Judi River,
Untold story of BBC…)
• The increase of Social Media Platforms which became a new platform
for the commission and propagation of genocide denial.
• We are witnessing a spike in genocide denial driven by the young
Youth should learn, understand and not be cowed or defensive about the
organization, execution and aftermath of the 1994 Genocide against the
Tutsi.
Rwandans should publish more on the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi
and promote reliable/truthful literature.
To fight against genocide denial and accept our history as Rwandans will
lead us to the sustainable unity and reconciliation with our history, thus
we build the Rwanda we want.
140
UNIT 7 THE NATIONAL DUTIES
AND OBLIGATIONS
Key unit competence: The learner should be able to analyze the national
duties and obligations.
In precolonial Rwanda, the Itorero was a cultural school. It was also the
channel through which the nation conveyed messages on national
culture to the people. This included information on language, patriotism,
social relations, sports, dances and songs, and defence of the nation. It also
played the role of a national forum for grooming leaders. Itorero trainees
would delve deeply in discussions relating to national programmes and
Rwanda’s cultural values with the aim of reaching a common vision
and instilling in themselves the virtues of humility, good conduct, and
common understanding of what the country would expect of them, and
the role of interdependence in the building of healthy socio-economic
relations.
141
don’ts of the society. Through Itorero Rwandans are also informed of
government policies and programmes. This strengthens ownership of
government programmes and promotes the role of the population in
their implementation.
Between May 1998 and March 1999, the consultative meetings in Urugwiro
recommended the revival of cultural values to promote good behaviours
of citizens. It is in this spirit that the Rwanda government decided to
draw from the Rwandan culture some home grown solutions to address
challenges in governance, the economy and social welfare.
Itorero ry’Igihugu was later revived at the official launch presided upon by
His Excellency the President of the Republic of Rwanda on 16/11/2007 in
the parliament buildings.
The Itorero for Rwandan diaspora has the authority to develop its affiliated
sub-division. From November 7th 2007 up to the end of 2012, Itorero ry’
Igihugu trained 284,209 Intore.
The number of Intore who have been trained at the village level is 814,587.
Those mentored at the national level carry out mentoring in villages,
schools, and at work places. In total, 1,098, 599 Rwandans have been
mentored.
7.3 Umuganda
The military personnel also participate in social activities like the building
of schools and hospitals. This inspires the population to be very active as
well.
Umuganda value has increased from Rwf12 billion in 2012 to Rwf17 billion
in 2015 and Rwf19 billion in 2016. With the increase in monetary activities,
Umuganda has seen Rwandans build over 400 offices of micro finance
institutions commonly known as Umurenge Sacco, and 11,000 classrooms
for the country’s ‘twelve year basic education’ which has increased school
enrolment to over 95 per cent of children in Primary Schools.
7.4 Imihigo
More specifically, findings from Imihigo are used to inform the government
of Rwanda about the following:
There are competing agendas between the central and local government.
Urgent assignments from line ministries and other central government
agencies interfere with local planning. Despite efforts for joint planning
meetings between the central and local levels, unplanned for requests
from the central government consume local resources (finances and time)
particularly when the demands are not accompanied with implementing
funds. In some instances, money to implement an inserted item will
be promised but not delivered when it comes to the implementation
phase or local authorities are told to insert items and are then told to get
resources from private sources.
Low ownership of Imihigo
Imihigo should be based on the needs of citizens at the local level and
national development priorities. However, Imihigo ownership is relatively
low among the intended beneficiaries. There is a “dependency syndrome”
where citizens depend on government to provide them with free or
subsidized goods. Citizens also compete for lower categories of Ubudehe
in order to become eligible for free healthcare and Vision 2020 Umurenge
Programme (VUP). These programmes are responsible for low ownership
of Imihigo.
There are two related issues that make it difficult to implement Imihigo
targets in a timely manner. First, there is a discrepancy between the fiscal
year and the period of Imihigo signing. This challenge comes from the
relationship with stakeholders most of whom use the calendar which
starts in January against the district’s fiscal year which starts in July. As
a result time is lost before Imihigo can be effectively implemented. More
specifically, Imihigo are usually signed 2-3 months after the fiscal year has
started. This means that almost a quarter is lost.
Before and during the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, citizens were
always scared and full of mistrust for law enforcing agencies.
Law enforcers were used by politicians to intimidate citizens and this gave
them a bad reputation because citizens saw them as part of the problem,
rather than protectors.
Unlike the previous law enforcers who served the criminal desires of a
genocidal regime, the police now serve the citizens professionally and
ensure that they have a say in the security of their communities.
It is when the community and the police work together for their common
good that citizens will trust the police.
Once the citizens trust the officers, they will provide them with information
to help prevent or solve crimes and to arrest criminals.
Students in discussions on community policing initiatives (Photo: RNP Media Centre) in 2014.
(Source: www.rwandapedia.rw)
The police also work with the Ombudsman’s office, prosecution and
other public entities to ensure that cases are properly documented and
information on justice is properly shared. Through such initiatives, citizens
gain more trust in the ability of the police to maintain law and order and
to follow up on the information they provide with professionalism.
In cases involving drug abuse and gender based violence, police get
information from responsible members of society and use it in operations
to raid homes.
The issue of human trafficking is not intense in Rwanda, but the police
is always aware of this threat. Citizens across the country volunteer
information whenever such cases occur and police acts immediately to
rescue victims.
On top of that, the police reach out to citizens during social events like
Umuganda and sensitization campaigns to discuss crime prevention.
During these events, real problems are dissected and solutions are found.
158
NATIONAL AND
UNIT 8 INTERNATIONAL
JUDICIAL SYSTEMS AND
INSTRUMENTS
Key unit competence: The learner should be able to analyze the national,
international judicial systems and instruments, and how justice has been
delayed and denied in the Rwandan society.
Explain the concepts of the judicial systems, and then present your
work to the class.
159
Judicial system is the system of law courts that administer justice and
constitute the judicial branch of government. It is also the branch of
government that is endowed with the authority to interpret and apply
the law, adjudicate legal disputes, and otherwise administer justice,
(Hamilton, 2005).
The judicial system usually consists of a Court of final appeal (called the
“Supreme Court” or Constitutional court) together with lower courts.
Note: the concept “judicial system” is also used to refer collectively to the
personnel such as judges, magistrates and other adjudicators who form
the core of a judiciary (sometimes referred to as “Bench”) as well as the
staffs who keep the system running smoothly.
Judicial instrument
Judicial instrument refers, in this way, to any legal instrument (legal
document) recorded with and authenticated by a public office or
employee. To carry weight, any such instrument, must be genuine and
authentic. Legal instruments consequently must bear the name, title,
and seal of the official that issued them, and should be written in the
presence of witnesses who attested to them, (Jennings, 1995).
Legal instrument is a legal term of art that is used for any formally executed
written document that can be formally attributed to its author, records
and formally expresses a legally enforceable act, process, or contractual
duty, obligation, or right, and therefore evidences that act, process, or
agreement. Examples include a certificate, deed, bond, contract, will,
legislative act, notarial act, court writ or process, or any law passed by a
competent legislative body in municipal (domestic) or international law.
Apart from the Supreme Court, there is a High Court with the chamber
of international crimes, the chamber of Nyanza in southern province, the
chamber of Rusizi in western province, the chamber of Rwamagana in
the eastern province and the chamber of Musanze in Northern Province.
The court covers a wide range of judicial activity. Chapter XIV of the United
Nations Charter authorizes the UN Security Council to enforce the court’s
rulings. However, such enforcement is subject to the veto power of the
five permanent members of the council.
Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands, seat of the ICJ. (Source: https://www.pinterest.com/
pin/860328335051369844)
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an intergovernmental organization
and international tribunal that sits in The Hague in the Netherlands. The
ICC has the jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for the international
crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.
Following the Second World War, the allied powers established two ad
hoc tribunals to prosecute axis power leaders accused of war crimes.
The International Military Tribunal, which sat in Nuremberg, prosecuted
German leaders while the International Military Tribunal for the Far East
in Tokyo prosecuted Japanese leaders. In 1948 the United Nations General
Assembly first recognized the need for a permanent international court to
deal with atrocities of the kind prosecuted after the Second World War. At
the request of the General Assembly, the International Law Commission
(ILC) drafted two statutes by the early 1950s. These were abandoned
during the Cold War which made the establishment of an international
criminal court politically unrealistic.
In 1994, the ILC presented its final draft statute for the International Criminal
Court to the General Assembly and recommended that a conference be
convened to negotiate a treaty that would serve as the Court’s statute.
To consider major substantive issues in the draft statute, the General
Assembly established the ad Hoc Committee on the Establishment of an
International Criminal Court, which met twice in 1995. After considering
the committee’s report, the General Assembly created the Preparatory
Committee on the Establishment of the ICC to prepare a consolidated
draft text. From 1996 to 1998, six sessions of the Preparatory Committee
were held at the United Nations headquarters in New York City, during
The court issued its first arrest warrants on 8 July 2005, and the first pre-
trial hearings were held in 2006. The court issued its first judgment in
2012 when it found Congolese rebel leader Thomas Lubanga Dyilo guilty
of war crimes related to using child soldiers.
International judicial instrument
An International judicial instrument is any international legal instrument
(legal document) recorded with and authenticated by international
bodies in the respect of the international law. The international legal
instrument obliges all states to enact, implement and monitor legislation
agreed upon by all states parties.
Since 1945, the international legal system has been dominated by the
United Nations and the structures were established as part of that
organization. In this perspective, it is better to take one example of the
international courts - International Court of Justice- as each one of the
examples given in the table above may have its own structure depending
on its mission.
It is the chief judicial organ of the United Nations. Its structure involves:
Presidency, Chambers and Committees, Judges ad hoc and the Registry.
The Rome Statute provides that the Office of the Prosecutor shall act
independently. No member of the office may seek or act on instructions
from any external source, such as states, international organizations, non-
governmental organizations or individuals.
Discuss different ways in which justice has been denied and delayed
in Rwanda. Thereafter, present the results of your discussion to the
class.
During the First and the Second Republics, the culture of impunity
was prevailing in Rwanda. The Tutsi were targeted and killed and the
perpetrators of these crimes were not punished. Moreover, the properties
of the Tutsi were either destroyed or confiscated. For instance in 1963,
more than 8,000 Tutsi were killed in Gikingoro. In the same period,
Kayibanda ordered the execution of 27 leaders of UNAR and RADER who
had been imprisoned in Ruhengeri without any form of legal procedure.
In 1973, a big number of Tutsi were chased from their jobs and schools.
Their killers however remained unpunished.
During the Liberation War which started on October 1st, 1990, the Tutsi
were attacked by government soldiers and Interahamwe. Many Tutsi
in Bugesera, Kibuye, Ngororero, Murambi in Byumba, the Bagogwe in
Ruhengeri and Gisenyi and the Bahima of Mutara were killed. The people
who committed these crimes did not face justice.
After the 1994 genocide against the Tutsi, justice faced the problem of
delay due to the following reasons:
1. Analyze the ways in which justice has been denied and delayed
in Rwanda.
2. Explain the organization of the International Court of Justice.
170
UNIT 9 DIGNITY AND SELF-
RELIANCE
Key unit competence: The learner should be able to identify the lessons
that can be learnt from the successful self-reliance policies of the African
leaders.
9.1.1 Dignity
Dignity refers to a proper sense of pride and self-respect i.e a sense of your
own importance and value. According to Cambridge Dictionary (online),
dignity is the importance and value that a person has, that makes other
people respect them or makes them respect themselves. E.g in Rwanda,
Dignity was one of the main characteristics of the social value UBUPFURA
each Rwandan was supposed to have.
9.1.2 Self-reliance
Self-reliance is defined as the ability to do things and make decisions by
yourself, without needing other people to help you. It is also “the value
which consists of the use of the blessings and abilities God has given to
you to care for yourself and your family and to find solutions for your own
problems”. Matthew W. of South Africa says, “I think you are self-reliant
when you don’t need your parents to do everything for you because you
know how to take care of yourself.” Self-reliance is important for everyone.
171
When you are self-reliant, you can depend on your own skills to support
yourself and to help others in your family and community.
Sign of obedience to their own leaders: Another factor for the success
of the self-reliance policies is that Africans accepted them as one way to
express their obedience to their new leaders.
The sacrifice where one’s personal interests, one’s life is sacrificed for
the sake of the general interests, self-denial, being visionary, exemplary,
honesty and love of heroic needs. In his character, Mutara III Rudahigwa
was against injustice, dishonest, nepotism and selfishness. He solved
impartially conflicts and disputes publically (abolition of clientelism-
Ubuhake in 1954).
These factors helped the King Mutara III Rudahigwa to achieve the
following:
• He mediated between the Belgian colonialists and the Catholic
Church;
• He highly advocated for equality, justice and the welfare of Rwandans
by eliminating clientelism (Ubuhake) by obliging rich Rwandans to
share cows and land equally by their servants;
• He advocated for democracy and fighting against injustice through
the King’s Court by fighting for independence and self-determination
of Rwandans;
• He worked hard to educate Rwandans through the establishment
of the Mutara Fund that helped Rwandans students to study
secondary schools and Universities in Europe without waiting for
Belgians support for educating Rwandans;
• Rudahigwa offered scholarships to many Rwandans to study in
Europe: He was interested in education of Rwandans without
depending on foreign scholarship.
His dreams started becoming the reality when the Triple Tacit Accord
(Colonial rule-King Mutara III Rudahigwa- Catholic Church) on the
systematic plan to rule over Rwandans made in early 1940s split apart
in1948. Many versions on the death of the King mention that this struggle
may be one of factors that ended up to cost his life on July 25th, 1959.
Harambee events may range from informal lasting a few hours, in which
invitations are spread by word of mouth, to formal, multi-day events
advertised in newspapers. These events have long been important ways
to build and maintain communities.
Following Kenya’s independence in 1963, the first prime minister, and later
first president of Kenya, Jomo Kenyatta adopted “Harambee” as a concept
of pulling the country together to build the new nation. He encouraged
communities to work together to raise funds for all sorts of local projects,
pledging that the government would provide their startup costs. Under
President Kenneth Kaunda of Zambia born on April 28th, 1924. (Source: Google/image)
Mandela’s vision
Nelson Mandela of South Africa (July 18, 1918 – December 5, 2013). (Source: Google/image)
Mandela’s administration inherited a country with a huge disparity
in wealth and services between white and black communities. In a
population of 40 million, around 23 million lacked electricity or adequate
sanitation; 12 million lacked clean water supplies, with 2 million children
not in school and a third of the population illiterate. There was 33 per cent
unemployment, and just under half of the population lived below the
poverty line.
The Land Restitution Act of 1994 enabled people who had lost their
property as a result of the Natives Land Act, 1913 to claim back their land,
leading to the settlement of tens of thousands of land claims. The Land
Reform Act 3 of 1996 safeguarded the rights of labour tenants who live
and grow crops or graze livestock on farms. This legislation ensured that
such tenants could not be evicted without a court order or if they were
over the age of 65. The Skills Development Act of 1998 provided for the
establishment of mechanisms to finance and promote skills development
at the workplace.
Nkrumah’s reforms
Nkrumah improved transport and communication by setting up a number
of roads and bridges. During his rule, piped water and electricity were
extended in most villages and towns. He improved health by setting up
www.rwandapedia.rw/explore/Umuganda
www.rwandapedia.rw/explore/gacaca
www.rwandapedia.rw/explore/imihigo
www.rwandapedia.rw/explore/itorero
www.rwandapedia.rw/explore/girinka
8. Evans, R. (1997). Rereading German History: From Unification to
Reunification, 1800-1996, Routledge.
9. Gatwa, T. (2005). The churches and ethnic ideology in Rwanda Crises
1900-1994, Regnum, Oxford.
10. Goldberg, E. (2006). Holocaust Memoir Digest: A digest of published
survivor Memoirs with study Guide and maps, vol. 3.
11. Gorman, M.J. (1989). The Unification of Germany, 1815–1871, Cambridge
University Press.
12. Gribbin, R.E. (2005). In the Aftermath of Genocide: The US role in
Rwanda. New York: Universe inc/Lincoln, New York.
13. Howard, M.C. (1985). The Franco-Prussian War: The German Invasion
of France, 1870-1871. Routledge.
14. Institute of Research and Dialogue for Peace .(2016). History and
conflicts in Rwanda.
15. Institute of Research and Dialogue for Peace, 2006 History and
conflicts in Rwanda, Kigali.
http:// www.minijust.gov.rw
http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Kenneth_Kaunda.aspx
http://www.britannica.com/biography/Kenneth-Kaunda
http://www.history.com/topics/nelson-mandela