SelfInSystemSensitizers
SelfInSystemSensitizers
=
pbicJfkJpvpqbj=
pbkpfqfwbop=
=
visit: www.powerandsystems.com
3
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Self-In-System Sensitizers is to help us become more aware of our
typical patterns of organizational behavior. We all develop our own unique patterns of
interaction with others. These patterns often become so ingrained that we lose sight of
them and the consequences they have for ourselves, for others and for the situations we
are in. And, as a result, we may also fail to consider optional patterns which have
potential for ourselves and our systems.
This exercise is not a test. There are no summary scores to tell you how well you are
measuring up as a manager. The purpose is to heighten awareness and to broaden your
sense of the options available to you. Hopefully, somewhere in this process, you will say
something like: “Aha! Isn’t it interesting that ‘X’ is what I typically do and that ‘Y’ and
‘Z’ might also be worthwhile alternatives for me to explore.”
INSTRUCTIONS
DIMENSION I:
POLITICAL AWARENESS
Introduction
Sometimes we are able both to involve ourselves in our work (to get into whatever work
we are supposed to be doing and enjoy it) and to be political about our work (to analyze
the system we are in, to strategize, to attempt to change system conditions).
***
On the following page you are asked to step back and look at your organizational
behavior in terms of being INNOCENT and being POLITICAL.
5
When we are stuck on INNOCENCE, we tend to pay little attention to the politics of our
work. When given a job to do, we tend to do it with few questions asked. We tend not to
strategize, to plan how to sell others on what it is we want to have happen. We tend to
trust others; we tend not to question their motives; we tend not to be suspicious or
skeptical about why people do what they do; we tend not to raise questions for ourselves
as to whether we should or should not do whatever we are doing. Our focus tends to be
on the work itself rather than on the politics of work.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
When we are stuck on POLITICAL, we tend not to give ourselves to our work as it is nor
do we derive our satisfaction from doing that work. Our energy is focused more on
analyzing our current condition—is it fair, reasonable or unreasonable—and on
maneuvering and strategizing, and attempting to change conditions.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
6
DIMENSION II:
INTERACTION COMFORT
Introduction
Sometimes we are able to interact freely with our social system environments. We can
comfortably give and take. We feel we can both influence these environments and allow
ourselves to be influenced by them.
***
On the following page you are asked to step back and look at your organizational
behavior in terms of being LOOSE and being TIGHT.
7
When we are stuck on LOOSE, we tend to go along with what is happening to us even
when we are uncomfortable with what is happening. We accede others’ wishes even
when we don’t want to. We allow unpleasant conditions to continue when we don’t want
them to continue. We would like to change these unpleasant conditions yet feel that we
cannot.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
When we are stuck on TIGHT, we tend to become rigid and unyielding in the face of
conditions we are uncomfortable with and don’t feel able to change. We tend to resist all
attempts to influence us. We tend to become inflexible, stubborn, annoyed, frustrated,
and angry. We feel upset about being that way, yet feel unable to change.
To what extent do you feel TIGHT characterizes your pattern of organizational behavior?
(Circle appropriate number)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
8
DIMENSION III:
AUTHORITY INTERACTIONS
Being Being
Stuck on Confronting Cooperating with Stuck on
Rebellion Authority Authority Submission
Introduction
Sometimes we are able to interact with authority figures—our bosses, experts, etc. At
times we cooperate with them and at times we confront them. At times we allow
ourselves to be influenced by them, and at times we resist such influence.
***
On the following page you are asked to step back and look at your organizational
behavior in terms of being SUBMISSIVE and being REBELLIOUS.
9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
When we are stuck on REBELLION, we tend to consistently resist, resent, and reject
authority figures. We do not cooperate with them or allow ourselves to be influenced by
them. Sometimes submission to authority makes us uncomfortable, and sometimes we
simply do not see submission or cooperation as options for us. Whatever the case, our
tendency is to resist authority.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
10
DIMENSION IV:
PEER INTERACTIONS
Introduction
***
On the following page you are asked to step back and look at your organizational
behavior in terms of INDIVIDUALITY and INCLUSIVENESS.
11
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
12
DIMENSION V:
MANAGING RESOURCES
Being Being
Stuck on Giving Withholding Stuck on
Giving Withholding
Introduction
We are often in situations in which we control resources that others want. We have what
they want—funds we could give, an opportunity we could provide, a favor we could do,
etc.—and we have the choice either to give or to withhold. Sometimes we are flexible in
the way we manage resources, at times giving and at times withholding.
Sometimes, however, we get stuck on GIVING (whenever others want what we have, our
tendency is to give); and sometimes we get stuck on WITHHOLDING (whenever others
want what we have, our tendency is to withhold).
***
On the following page you are asked to step back and look at your organizational
behavior in terms of being GIVING and being WITHHOLDING.
13
When we are stuck on GIVING, we are reluctant to say “no” to others. Sometimes we
give up resources—provide funds, give our services, do favors, and so forth—even when
we don’t want to and even when we would prefer to say no. And sometimes we give up
resources because we feel that’s the right way for us to be, because we don’t believe in
saying no.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
14
DIMENSION VI:
MANAGING STRUCTURE
Introduction
Structuring has to do with the extent to which we maintain control over the framework
within which others work. Do we create clear agendas for meetings and hold to these
agendas? Do we clearly spell out for others what we expect them to do, and do we hold
them to these expectations? Do we set time schedules, and do we hold others to these
schedules? Do we specify the rules and procedures we expect others to work by, and do
we hold them to these rules and procedures?
Sometimes we are comfortable in being able both to structure situations for others and to
modify or adapt structures we have created. We are able to set agendas, time schedules,
expectations, rules and procedures and hold people to these; and we are able to back off
from what we have created and modify it, change it, or eliminate it altogether.
Sometimes, however, we get stuck on OVERSTRUCTURING, that is we are reluctant to
modify existing structures and once we create new structures, we are reluctant to modify
these. And sometimes we get stuck on UNDERSTRUCTURING, that is, we are
reluctant to create structures for others and we allow others to change whatever structures
we have created.
***
On the following page you are asked to step back and look at your organizational
behavior in terms of UNDERSTRUCTURING and OVERSTRUCTURING.
15
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
16
DIMENSION VII:
INVOLVEMENT
Introduction
Sometimes in organizational interaction we are able to move back and forth between
participating and observing, between jumping right into the middle of the action and
pulling back from the action to look at and try to make sense out of what is happening.
Sometimes we are able to manage our involvement flexibly; we are able both to get into
the thick of the action and make things happen for ourselves and others, and to step back
and observe.
Sometimes, however, we get stuck on PARTICIPATION (we jump into situations and we
tend not to pull back to see what is happening to us and others); and sometimes we get
stuck on OBSERVATION (we spend much of our energy watching, observing and
figuring things out, and we tend to keep ourselves from direct participation).
***
On the following page you are asked to step back and look at your organizational
behavior in terms of being stuck on OBSERVATION and being stuck on
PARTICIPATION.
17
To what extent do you feel being stuck on PARTICIPATION characterizes your pattern
of organizational behavior? (Circle appropriate number)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
To what extent do you feel being stuck on OBSERVATION characterizes your pattern of
organizational behavior? (Circle appropriate number)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
18
DIMENSION VIII:
MANAGING ENERGY
Introduction
Sometimes we are in situations which need to be stirred up. We and others may be
uninvolved, listless and apathetic. We may not be using the skills and abilities we have.
We may be in a rut, going along with our usual ways of doing things even when these
ways are no longer effective. The pot needs to be stirred in order to get us thinking,
feeling, and acting more effectively. And sometimes we are in situations which need to
be cooled off. The situation may be explosive, chaotic. Feelings may be so high that
people are unable to listen to one another and to work together. And the situation needs
to be cooled down in order that people can think more clearly, communicate more
effectively, and work together.
Sometimes we are able to move back and forth between stirring things up and calming
them down. Sometimes, however, we get stuck on CALMING DOWN (we tend not to
act in ways which would increase tension in the system). And sometimes we get stuck on
STIRRING UP (we tend to be reluctant to act in ways which would reduce tension in the
system).
***
On the following page you are asked to step back and look at your organizational
behavior in terms of CALMING DOWN and STIRRING UP.
19
When we are stuck on CALMING DOWN, we tend to be reluctant to act in ways which
would increase tension in the system. We tend to avoid conflicts, to keep them from
developing and to suppress them when they do develop. We tend to avoid actions which
might create trouble for ourselves and others. In the face of conflict or potential conflict,
our tendency is to compromise, mediate, heal and repair. Sometimes we are stuck on
CALMING DOWN because we believe that tension is bad for the system; and sometimes
we are stuck because we feel uncomfortable in high tension situations.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
When we are stuck on STIRRING UP, we tend to be reluctant to act in ways which
would reduce tension in the system. We tend to avoid healing activities or activities that
would repair relationships; we tend to avoid compromises or mediation processes.
Sometimes we are stuck on STIRRING UP because we believe that high energy is good
for the system; and sometimes we are stuck because we are uncomfortable with activities
involving healing, repairing, compromising, and mediating.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
not at all somewhat very
characteristic characteristic characteristic
20
SUMMARY SHEET
Chart your scores on this summary sheet to get a feel for your basic pattern. Be
particularly attuned to those areas in which you are high on one tendency and low on its
opposing tendency.
We hope completing the Sensitizer provided you with insight into your patterns of system
behavior. System leadership requires flexibility and the ability to respond effectively to
the unique opportunities of each situation we face. Being high on one aspect of these
dimensions and low on its opposing tendency may indicate areas where greater flexibility
is needed. Your Sensitizer summary scores point the compass in the direction of which
areas you may need to work on to be a more effective leader.
The Power Lab is a practice field designed specifically to deal with these dimensions. In
this learning environment you will be guided by expert coaches who will encourage you
to go beyond your usual patterns, to test out behaviors that will produce more powerful
results for you and for the systems of which you’re a part.
Or call us at 800/241-0598.