1320A-AtefCheaitani-TheLatestDevelopmentsinConcreteCathodicProtectionforInfrastructureAssets
1320A-AtefCheaitani-TheLatestDevelopmentsinConcreteCathodicProtectionforInfrastructureAssets
Positive
Concrete
Negative
Cathodic
protection
Galvanic System
Chloride
free concrete
Positive
Concrete
Negative
• Attractive concept.
• Installation duration and cost is similar to ICCP.
• More destructive in comparison to a ribbon anode systems
• No published performance data indicating compliance with the
Australian Cathodic Protection Standard AS2832.5
Latest Developments
o Chloride ions in the concrete migrate away from the reinforcing steel.
The residual protective effect occurs due to chloride ion migration away
from the reinforcing steel and steel passivation.
This effect has only been observed during ICCP system application.
The Residual Effect of ICCP
After 18 Months of Operation
The Residual Effect of ICCP
After 10 Years of Operation
Guidelines:
ICCP should be considered for structures with high concrete resistivity high
levels of corrosion, and where long-term corrosion protection is required.
Solar technology (ICCP) is an ideal solution for small bridges in remote locations
(no mains power) with high resistivity and high corrosion activity.
Properly designed ICCP system can fully meet the Australian Standard criteria
for cathodic protection in concrete.
Galvanic based systems are more suited to smaller structures and structures in
remote locations with low resistivity and low corrosion activity. Galvanic
systems are especially effective in conjunction with galvanic water anode
systems (e.g. for protection of piles of small bridges). Unlikely to meet the
Australian Standard criteria but, with good design, may provide considerable
protection.
Summary:
• There is no single magic technology that can be used for all
applications.