0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

FBA-Interview-for-Teachers-and-Staff

Uploaded by

ecarbonell
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

FBA-Interview-for-Teachers-and-Staff

Uploaded by

ecarbonell
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Functional Assessment Checklist for Teachers and Staff (FACTS-Part A)

Student: Grade Date:


Staff Interviewed: Interviewer:
ROUTINES ANALYSIS: Where, When and With Whom Problem Behaviors are Most Likely.
Time Routine/Activity & Likelihood of Problem Specific Problem Current Intervention for
Staff Involved Behavior Behavior the Problem Behavior
Low High
1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 4 5 6

PRIORITIZED ROUTINE: Select a routine with a rating of 5 or 6. Only combine routines when there is
significant similarity in (1) activities (conditions) and (2) problem behavior(s). Complete the remainder of
this page and FACTS-Part B for the prioritized routine identified below.
Routines/Activities/Context Problem Behavior(s)
Prioritized
Routine
**If 3 or more routines are rated a 5 or 6, refer case to behavior specialist for a Complex FBA**

Functional Assessment Checklist for Teachers & Staff (FACTS-Part B)


STUDENT STRENGTHS: Identify at least three strengths or contributions the student brings to school.
Academic strengths -
Social/Recreational -
Other -
BEHAVIOR(s): Rank order the top priority problem behaviors occurring in the targeted routine above:
___ Tardy ___ Fight/physical Aggression ___ Disruptive ___ Theft
___ Unresponsive ___ Inappropriate Language ___ Insubordination ___ Vandalism
___ Self-injury ___ Verbal Harassment ___ Work not done ___ Other ________________
Describe prioritized problem behavior(s) in observable terms: _______________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________

What is the frequency of the Problem Behavior in the targeted routine (# x’s /day or hour)?
What is the duration of the Problem Behavior in the targeted routine (in seconds or min)?
Is Behavior Immediate Danger to Y N
self/others? If Yes, refer case to Behavior Specialist for a Complex FBA

Adapted for Basic FBA to BIP by C. Borgmeier & S.Loman (2016) from March, Horner, Lewis-Palmer, Brown, Crone & Todd, 1999)
Last revised 12/14/2017
Functional Assessment Checklist for Teachers & Staff (FACTS-Part B)
Specify the Target Routine: Use the prioritized routines from FACTS-Part A for assessment.
Routine/Activities/Context & Staff Name Problem Behavior(s) – make description observable

ANTECEDENT(s): Rank Order the strongest triggers/predictors of problem behavior in the routine above.
Then ask corresponding follow-up question(s) to get a detailed understanding of triggers ranked #1 & 2.
Environmental Features (Rank order strongest 2) Follow Up Questions – Get as Specific as possible
___a. task too hard ___g. large group If a,b,c,d or e - describe task/demand in detail ___________
___b. task too easy instruction _________________________________________________
___c. bored w/ task ___h. small group work If f - describe purpose of correction, voice tone, volume etc.
___d. task too long ___i. independent work _________________________________________________
___e. physical demand ___j. unstructured time If g, h, I, j or k - describe setting/activity/content in detail
___f. correction/reprimand ___k. transitions _________________________________________________
___Other ______________ ___l. with peers If l – what peers? __________________________________
Describe ______________ ___m. isolated/no attention If m – describe -
CONSEQUENCE(s): Rank Order the strongest pay-off for student that appears most likely to maintain the
problem behavior in the routine above. Then ask follow-up questions to detail consequences ranked #1 & 2.
Consequences/Function As applicable -- Follow Up Questions – Get as Specific as possible
___ a. get adult attention If a or b -- Whose attention is obtained?
___ b. get peer attention How is the (positive or negative) attention provided?
___ c. get preferred activity
___ d. get object/things/money If c, d, e, or f -- What specific items, activities, or sensations are obtained?
___ e. get sensation
___ f. get other, describe________ If g or h- Describe specific task/activity/sensation avoided?
_________________________ Be specific, DO NOT simply list subject area, but specifically describe type of work
___ g. avoid undesired activity/task within the subject area?
___ h. avoid sensation
___ i. avoid adult attention Can the student perform the task independently? Y N
___ j. avoid peer attention Is academic assessment needed to ID specific skill deficits? Y N
___ k. avoid/escape other, describe If i or j – Who is avoided? _____________________________________
_________________________ Why avoiding this person?

SETTING EVENT(s): Rank Order any events that happen outside of the immediate routine (at home or earlier in
day) that commonly make problem behavior more likely or worse in the routine above.
__ hunger __ conflict at home __ conflict at school __ missed medication __ illness __failure in previous class
__ lack of sleep __change in routine __ homework not done __ not sure __ Other___________________________
SUMMARY OF BEHAVIOR
Fill in boxes below using top ranked responses and follow-up responses from corresponding categories above.
ANTECEDENT(s) / Triggers Problem BEHAVIOR(s) CONSEQUENCE(s)/ Function
Routine:
Trigger:

SETTING EVENTS

How likely is it that this Summary of Behavior accurately explains the identified behavior occurring?
Not real sure 100% Sure/No Doubt
1 2 3 4 5 6
Adapted for Basic FBA to BIP by C. Borgmeier & S.Loman (2016) from March, Horner, Lewis-Palmer, Brown, Crone & Todd, 1999)

You might also like