UNIT_3 Lecture Notes
UNIT_3 Lecture Notes
LECTURE NOTES
ON
UNCONVENTIONAL
MACHINING PROCESS
Prepared
By
Aditya Nagar, ADB Road, Surampalem, East Godavari Dist, Andhra Pradesh-533437
1
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
Syllabus:
2
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
• Michael Faraday discovered that if two electrodes are placed in a bath containing a
conductive liquid and D.C. potential is applied across-them, “metal can be de- plated
from the anode and plated on the cathode”
• This principle was in use for a long time in a process called 'electroplating'. With
certain modifications, ECM is the reverse of electro plating
3
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
4
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
Working Principle:
5
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
• Control system. Electrical parameters of the process, , tool feed speed and parameters
of electrolyte circulation system are controlled by the control system, which provide
stable and efficient operation of the unit.
6
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
• Modification of the tool profile to get the required final surface is relatively complex -
FEM can be used to get the final tool design
• Designer must determine the nature and the extent of the required deviation or gap
allowances from the mirror image configuration, while providing for a uniform and
sufficiently high flow rate of electrolyte in the gap to allow a practical MRR
• Tool dimensions must be slightly different from the nominal mirror dimensions of the
completed part to allow for ECM overcut
• Part and the cathode must have adequate current-carrying capacity
• ECM cell must have strength and rigidity to avoid flutter and arcing
Electrolyte
• Electrolytes used in ECM should be carefully selected so that they provide the
necessary reactions without plating the cathode
• Functions expected:
• Completing the electrical circuit between the tool and the workpiece
• Allowing the desirable machining reactions to take place
• Carrying away the heat generated during the operation
• Carrying away products of reaction from the zone of machining
7
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
• The rate of material removal in ECM is governed by Faraday‟s law and is a function
of current density.
• Current density is not only controlled by the amount of current that the power supply
is delivering, but also by the size of the IEG
• A small IEG results in the highest current density. However, when its very small,
there is a danger of sludge particles bridging the gap and causing a short circuit
• When the gap is too large, current density is reduced, resulting in a poor surface finish
and decreased MRR
• Other variables that affect the current density and the MRR are:
1. Voltage
2. Feed rate
3. Electrolyte conductivity
4. Electrolyte composition
5. Electrolyte flow
6. Workpiece material
Voltage
• Voltage across the cutting gap influences the current and the MRR and is controlled in
most ECM operations
• Low voltage decreases the equilibrium machining gap and results in a better surface
finish and finer tolerance control
• Increased current leads to electrolyte heating – low temperature of the electrolyte is
conducive for a better surface finish and tolerances
Feed rate
• Feed rate determines the current passed between the tool and thework
• As the tool approaches the work, the length of the conductive path decreases and the
magnitude of the current increases
• High feed rate results in higher MRR
• High feed rates also decreases the equilibrium machining gap resulting in
improvements of the surface finish and tolerance control
• Most rapid feed possible is not only highly productive but also produces the best
quality of surface finish
• At slower feed rates, the MRR decreases as the gap increases resulting in the rise of
resistance and drop in the current
• Limitations of feed rate are removal of hydrogen gas and products of machining;
8
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
9
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
10
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
Dimensional tolerances for ECM are ±0.13 mm for the frontal gap and ±0.25 mm for the side
gap. Overcut of 0.05 mm, taper of 1 mm/mm, and a corner radii of 5 mm are possible and
depend on the configuration of the cathodic tool used.
11
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
ECONOMICS OF ECM
The total cost of machining a single component by ECM, Cpr, is made from the following
Components:
1. Machining time cost, Ctm. This element decreases when using high feed rates.
2. Cost related to the tool, Ct. This includes the cost of toolmaking and tool changing as
a result of damage by the incidence of sparking when using high machining rates. The
tool cost, therefore, increases at high feed rates.
3. Cost related to the electrolyte, Ce. It includes the electrolyte cost, filter cost,
electrolyte changing cost, and the cost of changing the filter. This element rises at
high machining rates.
4. The cost of nonproductive time, Cst. This component of cost is not affected by the
machining rate.
Therefore,
Cpr = Ctm + Ct + Ce + Cst
Figure 3.8 shows the graphical presentation of the main elements of total ECM cost. It is
accordingly clear that an optimum feed rate that realizes minimum cost (economical feed
rate) exists. Machining at lower feed rates increases the machining time and impairs the
product accuracy and surface quality. On the other hand, machining at higher feed rates raises
the current density and the material removal rate, however, electrolyte heating, boiling, and,
consequently, the occurrence of sparking damage the tool and workpiece and raise the
production cost as shown in Figure 3.9.
Figure 3.8: Variation of total production cost with ECM feed rate
12
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
Figure 3.9: Variation of total production cost, removal rate, and surface roughness with
ECM feed rate.
13
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
14
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
Electrochemical Grinding:
Electrochemical grinding (ECG) is similar to ECM except that the cathode is a specially
constructed grinding wheel as shown in Figure 3.11. The insulating abrasives of diamond or
aluminum oxide (60–320 grit) are set in a conductive bonding material. These abrasive
particles act as a spacer between the grinding wheel conductive bond and the workpiece.
Accordingly, a constant interelectrode gap of about 0.025 mm or less is maintained for the
flow of the NaNO3 electrolyte. The wheel rotates at a surface speed of 20–35 m/s. On the
application of the gap voltage of 4–40 V, a current density of about 20–240 A/cm2 is created
that removes metal mainly by ECM. The mechanical grinding accounts for an additional 5%–
10% of the total material removal by abrading the possible insoluble films from the anodic
workpiece surface. Removal rates by ECG are four times faster than conventional grinding
and it always produces burr-free and unstressed parts. The volumetric removal rate is
typically 1,600 mm3/min.
15
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
16
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
17
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
1984). A gap voltage of 70–150 V is employed, which is 10 times greater than those for
normal ECM.
A typical application is the drilling of small rows of cooling holes of 0.127– 1.27 mm
diameter in turbine blades, with depth-to-diameter ratio up to 50/1. The process produces
cooling ducts running at an angle of 45° to the surface of the blade and having a diameter less
than 0.8 mm. Drilling wire EDM start holes of less than 0.5 mm are also produced by
electrostream (ES). Feed rates for ES range from 0.75 to 2.5 mm/min. Normal tolerances are
within ±10% of the produced hole diameter and are ±0.05 mm for the depth tolerance.
18
UNIT-III UNCONVENTIONAL MACHINING PROCESS
drilling holes for corrosion-resistant metals of low conventional machinability, and drilling
oil passages in bearings where EDM causes cracks.
19