PHASE 1: PRE-PROJECT PHASE

KEEP SATISFIED MANAGE CLOSELY

• REGULATORY AUTHORITIES • DPWH REGIONAL OFFICE III

• REGIONAL DIRECTOR
• ASST. REGIONAL DIRECTOR
• ACCOUNTANT IV
• CHIEF, PLANNING AND
DESIGN DIVISION
• ENGINEER II
High • CHIEF, HIGHWAYS DESIGN
SECTION
• CHIEF, CONSTRUCTION
DIVISION

INFLUENCE
MONITOR KEEP INFORMED
(MINIMUM EFFORT)
• SUPPLIERS
• GENERAL PUBLIC • DPWH EMPLOYEES
• LOCAL
COMMUNITY/RESIDENTS
• PROJECT MANAGERS

Low

Low INTEREST High

PHASE 1: PRE-PROJECT PHASE

Table 1: Stakeholders During Pre-Project Phase

WHAT DO WE NEED FROM RISK IF THEY ARE NOT

STAKEHOLDERS
THEM? ENGAGED
- Provide necessary permits, - Delays in project start due
approvals, and clearances for to lack of permits or
project implementation. approvals.
- Ensure compliance with - Non-compliance with
national standards, codes, regulations, leading to fines,
DPWH Regional Office III and regulations. penalties, or work stoppages.
- Coordinate infrastructure - Potential conflicts with
GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION integration with public works public infrastructure projects
(e.g., roads, drainage or policies.
systems). - Negative public perception
- Facilitate alignment with or legal issues stemming
government development from unauthorized work.
plans and policies.
- Oversee regional - Delays in obtaining essential
compliance with construction permits or approvals from
standards, policies, and regional authorities.
regulations. - Non-compliance with local
- Facilitate the approval and regulations or infrastructure
issuance of permits and requirements, leading to
Roseller A. Tolentino clearances for the project. project delays or redesigns.
REGIONAL DIRECTOR - Ensure the project aligns - Risk of poor alignment with
with regional infrastructure regional development goals
plans and priorities. or conflicting priorities.
- Provide guidance on regional - Increased risk of legal or
environmental, safety, and public opposition if the project
planning requirements. does not meet regional
standards.
- Support the Regional - Delays in the approval
Director in the approval process or missing critical
process for permits and requirements for project
project clearances. compliance.
- Provide expertise on local - Lack of coordination with
regulations and site-specific local stakeholders, leading to
issues. potential conflicts or logistical
Melquiades H. Sto. Domingo
- Facilitate coordination with issues.
ASSISTANT REGIONAL local government units (LGUs) - Missed opportunities for
DIRECTOR and other agencies. aligning with regional
- Ensure project compliance development plans or
with regional infrastructure infrastructure goals.
priorities and safety - Increased risk of legal
standards. complications due to
insufficient knowledge of
regional regulations.
PHASE 1: PRE-PROJECT PHASE

- Oversee the technical and - Inefficiencies or construction

operational aspects of the challenges due to unrealistic
project. timelines or unfeasible
- Provide input on construction methodologies.
methodologies, feasibility, and - Risk of poor project planning
timelines. or errors in the construction
Jayson S. Jauco - Ensure the project design is process.
CHIEF, CONSTRUCTION practical and achievable from - Increased chances of
DIVISION a construction perspective. delays, cost overruns, or
- Coordinate with contractors, project failure due to
engineers, and other technical inadequate technical
teams to ensure project oversight.
readiness. - Potential for conflicts
between design and
construction execution,
leading to costly revisions.
- Ensure financial compliance - Risk of budget
and accurate budgeting for the mismanagement or cost
project. overruns due to lack of proper
- Provide detailed cost financial oversight.
analysis, forecasting, and - Delays in project due to
financial tracking. unclear financial tracking or
- Monitor cash flow and project funding issues.
Rachel N. Bartolome
expenditures to ensure they - Potential legal or contractual
ACCOUNTANT IV align with financial plans. issues arising from incorrect
- Advise on financial risks and or incomplete financial
help structure payment records.
schedules and contracts. - Inability to secure necessary
project funding or approvals
due to poor financial planning
or reporting.
- Lead the development of the - Design flaws or inefficiencies
project’s master plan and that may lead to delays or
design, ensuring it aligns with higher costs during
technical, regulatory, and construction.
aesthetic requirements. - Non-compliance with
- Ensure that all designs regulatory or zoning
comply with zoning laws, requirements, resulting in
Arthur Q. Santos
environmental regulations, delays or redesigns.
CHIEF, PLANNING AND DESIGN and construction standards. - Potential conflicts between
DIVISION - Provide expertise in design intentions and
optimizing the design for cost- construction feasibility,
effectiveness and causing rework.
constructability. - Missed opportunities to
- Coordinate with other optimize design for better
departments to ensure the functionality or cost savings.
design is holistic and feasible.
PHASE 1: PRE-PROJECT PHASE

- Provide technical expertise - Risk of technical errors or

in the evaluation of design design flaws due to
plans and construction insufficient engineering input.
feasibility. - Delays in project planning or
- Assist in preparing detailed execution due to incomplete
engineering reports and or inaccurate engineering
analysis. assessments.
Gener G. Guinto - Help with calculations, - Potential safety or regulatory
ENGINEER II assessments, and issues arising from poor
recommendations for technical evaluations.
structural, mechanical, or civil - Increased costs or
components of the project. inefficiencies if engineering
- Collaborate with senior designs need to be revisited
engineers to ensure the or revised.
project meets safety,
performance, and regulatory
standards.
- Lead the design and - Design flaws in roadways or
planning of highways or traffic management systems,
roadways, ensuring the causing safety hazards or
project meets traffic, safety, inefficiencies.
and environmental standards. - Delays or redesigns due to
- Provide expertise in highway non-compliance with
Rossana D. Macatuno geometry, materials, and regulatory standards or
CHIEF, HIGHWAYS DESIGN structural design. design errors.
SECTION - Ensure the design aligns with - Increased project costs due
national and regional to poor design choices that
infrastructure guidelines. require revisions.
- Coordinate with other - Potential legal or public
departments (e.g., civil, opposition from poorly
structural engineers) for planned or unsafe
integrated planning. infrastructure.
- Assist in the preparation and - Risk of design flaws or
review of project designs, discrepancies that may cause
plans, and specifications. delays or require costly
- Conduct detailed revisions.
assessments and provide - Increased risk of non-
technical evaluations to compliance with regulatory
ensure design feasibility. requirements, leading to
Jackielyn D. Sanguyo - Ensure the project aligns potential legal or safety
ENGINEER II with regulatory standards and issues.
safety requirements. - Delays in the design phase
- Collaborate with senior due to lack of technical
engineers and other evaluations or input.
departments to optimize - Misalignment between the
project designs for cost, project’s intended design and
efficiency, and functionality. its actual feasibility or
execution.
PHASE 1: PRE-PROJECT PHASE

- Provide necessary materials, - Delays in construction due to

equipment, and resources for late or unavailable materials.
construction. - Increased costs if materials
- Ensure timely delivery of are not sourced efficiently or
materials to meet project within budget.
schedules. - Poor quality materials
SUPPLIERS - Offer insight into material leading to safety risks or
availability, costs, and lead rework.
times. - Potential supply chain
- Ensure that materials meet disruptions if suppliers are not
quality standards and project adequately coordinated.
specifications.
- Assist in ensuring the project - Delays in securing
complies with national and necessary approvals or
local regulations and permits due to lack of
standards. engagement with regulatory
- Provide technical support, personnel.
guidance, and local - Non-compliance with DPWH
knowledge regarding standards, leading to rework
infrastructure and site or project stoppages.
DPWH EMPLOYEES conditions. - Lack of alignment with
- Facilitate coordination with government priorities or
other agencies and infrastructure policies.
stakeholders for permits, - Increased risk of project
approvals, and clearances. failure due to inadequate
- Contribute to the design and support from the regulatory
planning process, particularly body.
in relation to public
infrastructure needs.
- Ensure the project aligns - Community opposition,
with community needs and protests, or delays if concerns
concerns. are not addressed.
- Gain local support for the - Potential legal or regulatory
project to avoid opposition or challenges from local
delays. residents.
LOCAL - Address any potential - Negative public perception
impacts on the community, or damage to the project’s
COMMUNITY/RESIDENTS
such as traffic, noise, or reputation.
environmental concerns. - Increased costs or project
- Facilitate positive stoppages due to unresolved
relationships and open community issues or
communication between the grievances.
project team and community
members.
PHASE 1: PRE-PROJECT PHASE

- Ensure the project complies - Risk of legal action, fines, or

with all relevant laws, codes, project delays due to non-
and safety regulations. compliance with regulations.
- Provide necessary - Work stoppages or
approvals, permits, and redesigns if required permits
clearances for the project to or approvals are not obtained.
proceed. - Increased costs and project
REGULATORY AUTHORITIES - Review the project’s delays due to failure to meet
environmental impact and safety or environmental
safety measures to ensure standards.
public health is protected. - Potential for negative public
- Facilitate the adherence to or legal scrutiny if regulatory
zoning laws, building codes, guidelines are not followed.
and environmental
regulations.
- Oversee the planning, - Delays, cost overruns, or
coordination, and execution of poor quality outcomes due to
the project. lack of leadership and
- Ensure that the project coordination.
meets time, cost, and quality - Misalignment between the
goals. design team, contractors, and
PROJECT MANAGERS - Lead the development of stakeholders.
detailed project schedules, - Increased risks to project
budgets, and resource plans. success due to poor planning
- Manage communication and or failure to mitigate issues.
coordination between all - Reduced efficiency in
stakeholders to ensure resolving challenges or
smooth project progress. conflicts among teams.
- Ensure that the project is - Public opposition, protests,
aligned with the public interest or backlash if concerns are
and does not negatively not addressed, leading to
impact the community. project delays.
- Address concerns regarding - Legal challenges or negative
environmental impact, safety, media coverage due to failure
and quality of life. to communicate the benefits
GENERAL PUBLIC - Provide a platform for public or mitigate concerns.
feedback and suggestions. - Damage to the project’s
- Foster transparency and reputation, making it harder to
build trust by keeping the secure future approvals or
public informed. funding.
- Increased project costs or
disruptions due to unresolved
public grievances or protests.