Atomic Structure Models
Atomic Structure Models
DEMOCRITUS THEORY
Highlights
Democritus was an ancient Greek philosopher, and one of the first atheists in history. Democritus (and his teacher
Leucippus), is credited with the development of the atomic theory. Using the idea that that if a stone was divided in
half, the two halves would have essentially the same properties as the whole. Therefore, he reasoned that if the stone
were to be continually cut into smaller and smaller pieces then; at some point, there would be a piece which would be
so small as to be indivisible. He called these small pieces of matter "atomos" meaning indivisible. Democritus,
theorized that atoms were specific to the material which they composed.
Failure
Democritus theory was unable to give ideas regarding changes in material (i.e., chemical reactions) and was it was
rejected by one of the most influential philosophers of Ancient Greece- Aristotle; and the atomic theory was ignored
for nearly 2,000 years.
DALTON'S ATOMIC THEORY (1803)
Highlights
• All matter consists of tiny particles called atoms.
• Atoms are tiny, solid spheres which are in continuous motion.
• Atoms are indestructible and unchangeable.
• Elements are characterized by the weight of their atoms.
• Atoms of different elements are different from each other.
• In chemical reactions, atoms combine in small, whole-number ratios. (Law of Definite Proportion)
Failure
Approximately fifty years after John Dalton's proposal was rejected based on two evidences:
1. Michael Faraday’s observation regarding role of electrical forces in joining of atoms in compounds. (1830)
2. Sir William Crookes discovery of cathode ray –the flow of electrically charged particles from one of rod to
another held in a sealed tube containing gas when electricity was passed. (1879)
3. Discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Roentgen while experimenting with cathode rays, Roentgen discovered that
if he directed these rays toward a paper plate coated with barium platinocyanide, the plate became fluorescent.
(1895)
4. Discovery of radioactivity in which radiations (alpha, beta and gamma rays) are emitted from elements
spontaneously resulting in their decomposition into simpler elements. (1896)
J. J. THOMSON'S ATOMIC THEORY (1897)
Highlights
• Atom is made up of negative electrons that float in a “soup” of positive charge, much like raisins in a fruit
cake
• The amount of positive and negative charge in an atom is exactly same and as such an atom is electrically
neutral.
• The electrons were thought to be positioned throughout the atom in rotating rings.
• In this model the atom was also sometimes described to have a “cloud” of positive charge.
• Distribution of whatever material exist in atom is uniform.
1
Page
Geiger-Marsden Set-up
RUTHERFORD'S ATOMIC THEORY
Highlights
• The positively charged particles and most of the mass of an atom was concentrated in an extremely small
volume. Rutherford called this region of the atom as a nucleus.
• The negatively charged electrons surround the nucleus of an atom.
• Electrons surrounding the nucleus revolve around it with very high speed in circular paths. He named these
circular paths as orbits.
• Electrons being negatively charged and nucleus being a densely concentrated mass of positively charged
particles are held together by a strong electrostatic force of attraction.
Maxwell, accelerated charged particles emit electromagnetic radiations and hence an electron revolving
Page
around the nucleus should emit electromagnetic radiation. This radiation would carry energy from the motion
of the electron which would come at the cost of shrinking of orbits. Ultimately the electrons would collapse
in the nucleus. Calculations have shown that as per Rutherford model an electron would collapse in the
nucleus in less than 10-8 seconds. So Rutherford model was not in accordance with Maxwell’s theory and
could not explain the stability of an atom.
• One of the drawbacks of the Rutherford model was also that he did not say anything about the arrangement
of electrons in an atom which made his theory incomplete.