Task Sheet (ITEM ANALYSIS)

Members: LINDAYEN, JOANA IRISH M.

BALDOMERO, KRYSTHEL ANNE M.

Learning Competencies: Judge quality of test items through conducting

Item Analysis

On Item Analysis)

1. Conduct brain-storming activity with your group. Decide which TOS to be used and
MCQs to be administered. Do some revisions of the TOS and exam, if necessary.
Pilot test the revised examination to 30 students. (Be able to document your meeting
by preparing narrative or minutes.

2. Score and rank the papers from highest to lowest according to the total score. (Use the
table below to indicate the scores of the students from highest to lowest)

Student Score Student Score Student Score

Student 1 33 Student 13 29 Student 25 26
Student 2 32 Student 14 29 Student 26 26
Student 3 32 Student 15 29 Student 27 26
Student 4 32 Student 16 28 Student 28 24
Student 5 31 Student 17 28 Student 29 24
Student 6 31 Student 18 28 Student 30 23
Student 7 31 Student 19 28 Student 31 22
Student 8 30 Student 20 27 Student 32 22
Student 9 30 Student 21 27 Student 33 20
Student10 30 Student 22 27 Student 34 20
Student11 30 Student 23 27 Student 35 18
Student 12 29 Student 24 26
Compute the Class level and Level of Proficiency (75%) (Show your computations)

75% 50x0.75 = 37.5 or 38

3. Present the scores of the students from the upper group (blue-coded) and the lower
group (red-coded).

Student Score Student Score Student Score

Student 1 33 Student 13 29 Student 25 26
Student 2 32 Student 14 29 Student 26 26
Student 3 32 Student 15 29 Student 27 26
Student 4 32 Student 16 28 Student 28 24
Student 5 31 Student 17 28 Student 29 24
Student 6 31 Student 18 28 Student 30 23
Student 7 31 Student 19 28 Student 31 22
Student 8 30 Student 20 27 Student 32 22
Student 9 30 Student 21 27 Student 33 20
Student10 30 Student 22 27 Student 34 20
Student11 30 Student 23 27 Student 35 18
Student 12 29 Student 24 26
 4. Present responses made to each item by each individual in the upper and lower group

Item Groups OPTIONS TOT Item Groups OPTIONS TOT

AL AL
No A B C D No A B C D
1 Upper Group 9 0 0 0 9 16 Upper Group 0 8 1 0 9

Lower Group 5 2 1 1 9 Lower Group 1 7 0 1 9

2 Upper Group 0 9 0 0 9 17 Upper Group 0 6 3 0 9

Lower Group 0 9 0 0 9 Lower Group 0 7 1 1 9

3 Upper Group 1 3 4 1 9 18 Upper Group 1 1 0 7 9

Lower Group 1 0 8 0 9 Lower Group 2 1 2 4 9

4 Upper Group 2 1 0 6 9 19 Upper Group 8 0 1 0 9

Lower Group 3 2 0 4 9 Lower Group 5 2 2 0 9

5 Upper Group 0 5 1 1 7 20 Upper Group 8 1 0 0 9

Lower Group 1 8 0 0 9 Lower Group 5 2 2 0 9

6 Upper Group 8 1 0 0 9 21 Upper Group 3 0 1 5 9

Lower Group 5 3 0 0 8 Lower Group 3 0 4 2 9

7 Upper Group 2 3 4 0 9 22 Upper Group 5 2 1 1 9

Lower Group 0 4 5 0 9 Lower Group 1 2 1 5 9

8 Upper Group 1 0 8 0 9 23 Upper Group 1 3 0 5 9

Lower Group 0 1 8 0 9 Lower Group 3 1 0 5 9

9 Upper Group 0 1 7 1 9 24 Upper Group 0 0 0 9 9

Lower Group 0 1 6 2 9 Lower Group 0 2 3 4 9

10 Upper Group 0 2 0 7 9 25 Upper Group 1 0 5 3 9

Lower Group 0 2 2 5 9 Lower Group 0 2 6 1 9

11 Upper Group 0 0 8 1 9 26 Upper Group 6 0 3 0 9

Lower Group 3 0 5 1 9 Lower Group 3 1 5 0 9

12 Upper Group 0 4 1 4 9 27 Upper Group 0 0 3 6 9

Lower Group 1 6 1 1 9 Lower Group 0 1 7 1 9

13 Upper Group 4 2 1 2 9 28 Upper Group 1 2 3 3 9

Lower Group 3 5 0 1 9 Lower Group 0 3 3 3 9

14 Upper Group 6 2 1 0 9 29 Upper Group 5 1 0 3 9

Lower Group 1 5 3 0 9 Lower Group 4 3 2 0 9

15 Upper Group 0 3 1 5 9 30 Upper Group 0 6 2 1 9

Lower Group 0 2 3 4 9 Lower Group 1 4 1 3 9

Item Groups OPTIONS TOTAL Item Groups OPTIONS TOTAL

No A B C D No A B C D
31 Upper Group 0 0 9 0 9 41 Upper Group 2 1 6 0 9

Lower Group 1 0 7 0 8 Lower Group 1 3 5 0 9

32 Upper Group 4 2 1 2 9 42 Upper Group 7 0 2 0 9

Lower Group 5 2 1 1 9 Lower Group 2 1 4 2 9

33 Upper Group 1 2 5 1 9 43 Upper Group 0 1 8 0 9

Lower Group 2 0 7 0 9 Lower Group 1 2 5 1 9

34 Upper Group 7 2 0 0 9 44 Upper Group 1 0 8 0 9

Lower Group 3 1 4 1 9 Lower Group 2 2 5 0 9

35 Upper Group 3 0 1 5 9 45 Upper Group 1 0 4 4 9

Lower Group 6 0 0 3 9 Lower Group 1 1 7 1 9

36 Upper Group 0 8 1 0 9 46 Upper Group 2 2 4 0 8

Lower Group 2 1 6 0 9 Lower Group 1 2 5 1 9

37 Upper Group 1 1 6 1 9 47 Upper Group 0 0 8 1 9

Lower Group 1 5 2 1 9 Lower Group 1 1 7 0 9

38 Upper Group 0 0 9 0 9 48 Upper Group 0 8 0 1 9

Lower Group 0 0 7 2 9 Lower Group 2 6 0 1 9

39 Upper Group 0 8 1 0 9 49 Upper Group 2 6 0 1 9

Lower Group 2 2 1 4 9 Lower Group 1 5 2 1 9

40 Upper Group 2 6 0 1 9 50 Upper Group 0 8 0 1 9

Lower Group 0 7 0 2 9 Lower Group 2 5 0 2 9

 5. Analyze test items by through Difficulty Index (Df) and Discrimination Index
(Di).

Item Upper Group Lower Group Difficulty Discrimination Judgement Decision

No. Index Index
1 9/9 1 5/9 0.56 0.78 0.44 FAIR REVISE
2 9/9 1 9/9 1 1 0 POOR REJECT

3 3/9 0.33 0/9 0 0.165 0.33 POOR REJECT

4 2/9 0.22 3/9 0.33 0.275 -0.11 POOR REJECT

5 5/9 0.56 8/9 0.89 0.725 -0.33 POOR REJECT

6 8/9 0.89 5/9 0.56 0.725 0.33 POOR REJECT

7 3/9 0.34 4/9 0.44 0.39 -0.1 POOR REJECT

8 8/9 0.89 8/9 0.89 0.89 0 POOR REJECT

9 7/9 0.78 6/9 0.67 0.725 0.11 POOR REJECT

10 7/9 0,78 5/9 0.56 0.67 0.22 POOR REJECT

11 8/9 0.89 5/9 0.56 0.725 0.33 POOR REJECT

12 4/9 0.44 1/9 0.11 0.275 0.33 POOR REJECT

13 4/9 0.44 3/9 0.33 0.385 0.11 POOR REJECT

14 6/9 0.67 1/9 0.11 0.39 0.56 FAIR REVISE

15 5/9 0.56 4/9 0.44 0.5 0.12 FAIR REVISE

16 8/9 0.89 7/9 0.78 0.835 0.11 POOR REJECT

17 0/9 0 1/9 0.11 0.055 -0.11 POOR REJECT

18 7/9 0.78 4/9 0.44 0.61 0.34 POOR REJECT

19 8/9 0.89 5/9 0.56 0.725 0.33 POOR REJECT

20 8/9 0.89 5/9 0.56 0.725 0.33 POOR REJECT

21 5/9 0.56 2/9 0.22 0.39 0.34 POOR REJECT

22 5/9 0.56 1/9 0.11 0.335 0.45 FAIR REVISE

23 5/9 0.56 5/9 0.56 0.56 0 FAIR REVISE

24 9/9 1 9/9 1 1 0 POOR REJECT

25 5/9 0.56 6/9 0.67 0.615 -0.11 POOR REJECT

26 8/9 0.89 3/9 0.33 0.61 0.56 FAIR REVISE

27 6/9 0.67 1/9 0.11 0.39 0.56 FAIR REVISE

28 3/9 0.33 3/9 0.33 0.33 0 FAIR REJECT

29 5/9 0.56 4/9 0.44 0.5 0.12 FAIR REVISE

30 2/9 0.22 1/9 0.11 0.165 0.11 POOR REJECT

31 9/9 1 7/9 0.78 0.89 0.22 POOR REJECT

32 2/9 0.22 2/9 0.22 0.22 0 POOR REJECT

33 1/9 0.11 0/9 0 0.055 0.11 POOR REJECT

34 7/9 0.78 3/9 0.33 0.555 0.45 GOOD RETAIN

35 5/9 0.56 3/9 0.33 0.445 0.23 FAIR REVISE

36 8/9 0.89 1/9 0.11 0.5 0.78 GOOD RETAIN

37 6/9 0.67 2/9 0.22 0.445 0.45 GOOD RETAIN

38 9/9 1 7/9 0.78 0.89 0.22 POOR REJECT

39 8/9 0.89 2/9 0.22 0.555 0.67 GOOD RETAIN

40 6/9 0.67 7/9 0.78 0.725 -0.11 POOR REJECT

41 6/9 0.67 5/9 0.56 0.615 0.11 POOR REJECT

42 7/9 0.78 2/9 0.22 0.5 0.56 GOOD RETAIN

43 8/9 0.89 5/9 0.56 0.725 0.33 POOR REJECT

44 8/9 0.89 3/9 0.33 0.61 0.56 FAIR REVISE

45 4/9 0.44 7/9 0.78 0.61 -0.34 POOR REJECT

46 2/9 0.22 2/9 0.22 0.22 0 POOR REJECT

47 8/9 0.89 7/9 0.78 0.835 0.11 POOR REJECT

48 8/9 0.89 6/9 0.67 0.78 0.22 POOR REJECT

49 1/9 0.11 1/9 0.11 0.11 0 POOR REJECT

50 1/9 0.11 2/9 0.22 0.165 -0.11 POOR REJECT

Summary:
Quality Item Number Total
of
Items
Retain 34, 36, 37, 39, 42 5
Revise 1, 14, 15, 22, 23, 26, 27, 29, 35, 44 10
Reject 2-13, 10-21, 24, 25, 28, 30-33, 38, 35
40, 41, 43, 45-50

Difficulty Item Number Total

Level
Very 3, 17, 30, 33, 49, 50 6
Difficult
Difficult 4, 7, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22, 27, 28, 32, 46 11
Average 15, 23, 29, 34, 35, 36, 37, 39, 42 9
Easy 1, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 40, 41, 17
43, 44, 45, 48
Very Easy 2, 8, 16, 24. 31. 38, 47 7

Narrative Report
 We the students of Bataan Peninsula State University - Balanga Campus, enrolled in the
Bachelor of Secondary Education program with a major in Social Studies, actively conducted a
pilot examination for Araling Panlipunan Grade 8. This
project was approved and supported by our
professor/dean, Mr. Leandro T. Olubia, as part of the
Assessment in Learning 1 course.

My partner and I started working on this project on

October 8, 2023. We first consulted the curriculum guide
to determine the appropriate grade level for our pilot test.
Next, we reviewed the learning objectives for the chosen
grade and researched online resources and an Araling
Panlipunan 8 textbook to gather question ideas. On the
same day, we consulted with the Grade 8 Araling
Panlipunan teacher to get an estimate of the teaching
hours dedicated to each learning objective. Based on this
information, we created a Table of Specifications (TOS)
to distribute the 50 pilot test items across the learning
objectives. We then used the textbook and conducted a
consultation with our professor for accuracy and clarity. Once the questionnaires were finalized,
we wrote a request letter to the principal and teacher of Mariveles National High School -
Cabcaben, personally delivering it on December 4, 2023. We were fortunate to receive approval
for our project on December 7, 2023. The same day,
we purchased small rewards for the top three scorers.
On December 7, at 11:10 AM, we conducted the pilot
test during the class time of Mrs. Florabel
Valenzuela's 8 - STE Aristotle, advised by Mrs. Riza
D. Bagtas. While the class has 34 students, two were
absent. To reach the target number of participants, we
recruited three additional students from the same year
level. After administering the pilot test, we reviewed
the answer sheets. Only one student achieved a score of 33.

After we conducted the pilot examination, my

partner and I immediately undertook an item analysis
during our holiday break. We decided to divide the task
equally. My responsibility was to type the students'
scores, arranged from highest to lowest, and compute
the class level and level of proficiency for each student.
My
partner took charge of the item analysis for both
the upper and lower groups, analyzing each item
by choice. She then asked me to calculate the
percentage of correct answers per item for each
group by dividing the total number of correct
answers by the total number of takers. She also
took on the task of obtaining the "Difficulty
Index" and "Discrimination Index" using
Microsoft Excel. Once finished, I reviewed the difficulty and
discrimination indices to make
judgments and decisions based on the
data. Finally, my partner compiled the
results into a final table.