IOP Device
IOP Device
Evaluation of VF
Sensitivity Specificity
IOP >21 mmHg 47.1% 92.4%
Is screening by
IOP
50% of POAG IOP <22
measurement
alone
patients mmHg
effective?
1 in 10-15 Detectable
patients with optic disc
high IOP damage
Whom to offer Low systolic and diastolic
Elevated IOP
IOP Older age
blood pressure
measurement? Family history of glaucoma
Disc hemorrhage Suspicious disc
Large cup-to-disc ratio
(Patients at Thin central
v cornea
High pattern standard
risk of Low ocular perfusion deviation on threshold visual
pressure
glaucoma) Type 2 diabetes mellitus
field testing
Hypothyroidism
Myopia Male sex
Principles of IOP measurement / Applanation
• most prolific method for measuring IOP.
• Its direct contact with the cornea and
determines IOP by utilizing the Imbert-Fick
principle to measure the force applied by the
device when a predetermined area of the
cornea is flattened.
Principles of IOP measurement / ORA
• measures corneal hysteresis (CH) and IOP
through a pneumatic mechanism with a
column of air.
• After sufficient pressure is applied to
applanate the cornea, the additional
pressure needed to indent the cornea is
used to calculate corneal elasticity and
therefore CH
• Algorithms are then used to adjust the
measured IOP to compensate for the
degree of measured CH.
Principles of IOP measurement / indentation
• involves creating a corneal deformation with a
truncated cone.
Principles of IOP measurement / rebound
Affected by corneal
thickness and other
corneal parameters
Can be used in a
Perkins
applanation supine position good feasible
tonometer
too
Topical anesthesia and
fluorescein are needed
TonoPen
Type Principle Advantages Disadvantages Performance Price
Hight variability and
Lightweight and
quite poor
portable
repeatability
No need of slit-
lamp or electricity
Influenced by corneal
parameters
Self-calibration,
provides quality
index
Air-puff
tonometers
Type Principle Advantages Disadvantages Performance Price
Easy and fast to Need of regular
use calibration
No need of topical
anesthesia and Possible germs aerosol
Air-puff fluorescein ideal as a
applanation medium
tonometers screening tool
Influenced by corneal
parameters
Can be used by
paramedical staff
Less accurate when
IOP > 20 mmHg
There is no generally accepted correction
formula.
The World Glaucoma Association Consensus
on IOP suggests that a correction factor
should not be used to adjust values
measured in individual patients
risk of developing POAG
OHTS was greater in eyes with
corneal thickness less than
European Glaucoma 555 µm compared with eyes
Prevention Study trials with corneal thickness 588
µm or greater.
Ocular
Response
Analyzer
Type Principle Advantages Advantages Disadvantages Performance Price
Simple to use, IOP correction for
self-calibration, corneal
provides quality biomechanical
index parameters
No need of
fluorescein,
High precision
disposable
probes
Self-calibration,
provides quality
Dynamic index
contour
contour Need of slit lamp and
tonometer poor medium
matching topical anesthesia
(DCT, Additional
PASCAL) Independent
information
from corneal
(ocular pulse
properties
amplitude)
Useful after
corneal refractive
surgery
BioResonat
or ART
Type Principle Advantages Disadvantages Performance Price
Self-calibration,
Need of probe
provides quality
disinfection
index
BioResonato
applanation moderate medium
r ART
Required training to
High reliability use
(median of
repeated IOP
measurements)
Affected by corneal
properties
Sensimed
Triggerfish
Type Principle Advantages Disadvantages Performance Price
Continuous
measurements It does not provide
over a 24-hour direct IOP values
period
corneal
Sensimed
curvature moderate feasible
Triggerfish
monitoring
Good tolerability
IOP estimation
accuracy not known
High
reproducibility
To sum up, what to
have in my clinic?
I think that 2 criteria are the most important, accuracy and
cost.
Excellent
• iCare
Good
• GAT, Perkins, ORA, Corvis,
Accuracy
Moderate
• Tonopen, BioResonator ART, Airpuff
Poor
• Dynamic Contour, Schiotz
Feasible
• iCare, GAT, Perkins, tonopen, airpuff
Moderate
Cost • BioResonator ART, Dynamic contour
Expensive
• Corvis, Ocular response analyzer