Enterprise Risk Management - Introduction
Enterprise Risk Management - Introduction
1
Risk management workshop
Why do we Risk
Risk and
need risk assessment
control matrix
management process
Risk
COSO model management Risk reporting
policy
Risk management workshop
Why do we Risk
Risk and
need risk assessment
control matrix
management process
Risk
COSO model management Risk reporting
policy
Risk management workshop
Risk management is a
– systematic process
– to identify, evaluate and
address risks pro-actively
Definition – continuously
– before such risks can impact
negatively
– on the organization’s
achievement of objectives
Risk management workshop
Why do we Risk
Risk and
need risk assessment
control matrix
management process
Risk
COSO model management Risk reporting
policy
Risk management workshop
• Board sets defines the business strategy and sets the risk appetite. This is reviewed on
a regular basis (at least once a year)
• The risk management strategy is executed by management who makes regular report
to the Board for monitoring
11
Risk management workshop
Why do we Risk
Risk and
need risk assessment
control matrix
management process
Risk
COSO model management Risk reporting
policy
Risk management workshop
COSO model
Risk management workshop
Information and
Communication relate to
those practices that ensure
that the right information is
communicated at the right
time to the right people.
Risk management workshop
Monitoring consists of
ongoing evaluations to
ensure controls are
functioning as designed,
and taking corrective
action to enhance control
activities if needed.
Risk management workshop
Combined assurance
Risk management workshop
Responsibilities Risk Owners manage risk and control (front line operating
management)
Management provides
To ensure the effectiveness
leadership and direction re
of risk management, rely on
risk management, and to
adequate line functions –
control overall risk-taking
including monitoring and
activities in relation to the
assurance functions
agreed level of risk appetite.
Risk management workshop
Third line of
defense
Risk management workshop
KRI’s
category)
Why do we Risk
Risk and
need risk assessment
control matrix
management process
Risk
COSO model management Risk reporting
policy
Risk management workshop
Objectives -
Promote a risk management culture
risk across the organization and
improve risk transparency to the
management stakeholders
policy
Maximise stakeholder’s value and
net worth by managing risks that
may impact the defined financial
and performance drivers
Risk management workshop
Why do we Risk
Risk and
need risk assessment
control matrix
management process
Risk
COSO model management Risk reporting
policy
Risk management workshop
Risk universe
Risk categories
51
Risk management workshop
Risk Management
• Identifying areas of
threat to the business
• Assessing the potential
impacts and managing
these
• Growth and continued
existence of the
business
Risk management workshop
Litigation Financial
• Claims by employees, public, • Cash flow adequacy
service providers, third parties • Liquidity and solvency
• Failure to exercise certain right • Financial losses
that is to its advantage. • Fruitless and wasteful
expenditure
• Budget allocations
• Financial statement integrity
• Revenue collection
• Increasing operational
expenditure
Internal risk categories
Material resources (procurement risk) Information Technology
Why do we Risk
Risk and
need risk assessment
control matrix
management process
Risk
COSO model management Risk reporting
policy
Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Approach
The structured ERM approach defines the key risks to business objectives across
the organization and evaluates the level of management preparedness to clearly
define opportunities to improve and/or monitor risks.
Define Inherent
Business Risks Define
Recommended
Course Of Action
63
Risk by organisational level
64
Risk management workshop
Process universe
Risk management workshop
Mega, major,
minor process
analysis
How do we assess risks?
68
Risk management workshop
Likelihood Impact
Plot on
Likelihood
the
x Impact
heatmap
Risk management workshop
Likelihood
Likelihood
L I KE LIHOOD D ESC R IPTION
The risk is almost certain to occur more than once within the next
Almost certain
12 months. (Probability = 100% p.a.)
Likely The risk is almost certain to occur once within the next 12 months.
(Probability = 50 – 100% p.a.)
Moderate The risk could occur at least once in the next 2 – 10 years.
(Probability = 10 – 50% p.a.)
Unlikely
The risk could occur at least once in the next 10 - 100 years.
The risk will probably not occur, i.e. less than once in 100 years.
Rare Refer page 47 of delegate handbook
(Probability = 0 – 1% p.a.)
Risk management workshop
Impact
Impact
Impact Description
Negligible impact.
Insignificant
Almost certain
5 10 15 20 25
Likely
4 8 12 16 20
Moderate
3 6 9 12 15
Unlikely
2 4 6 8 10
Rare
1 2 3 4 5
Impact
Assessing Risk – Likelihood cont…
73
Assessing risk – Impact cont …
EBIT / EPS Value Disclosure Scope Legal/Regulatory Reputational Market Share Strategy
2 or more changes in
3 Business Units; Management Challenged
> 20% Loss of confidence by Long Term Recovery senior leadership,
>20% Loss of Fiscal Quarter Significant interruptions to
4 Significant Large Legal Liabilities 3 or more stakeholder (i.e., financial restructuring,
EBIT / EPS Market Value Restatement business operations within
Regulatory Fines / DPAs groups 12-24 months) significant changes to
3 or more business units
strategic plan.
1 or more changes in
2 Business Unit(s); Management Reviewed
> 15% Loss of confidence by senior leadership,
>15% Loss of Significant Moderate interruptions Mid-term Recovery (i.e.,
3 High Legal Reserve Established 2 or more stakeholder significant changes to
EBIT / EPS Market Value Deficiency within 2 or more business 6-12 months)
Regulatory Investigation groups operating plans and
unit(s).
execution.
> 5% >5% Loss of Additional Risk Limited interruptions within Limited Liabilities or Limited impact to 1 Limited Recovery (i.e., Limited Adjustment
1 Low
EBIT / EPS Market Value Disclosure 1 business unit Regulatory Impact stakeholder group less than 3 months) Necessary
74
Risk Assessment Criteria (“RAC”)
H M H H
M L M H
Impact
L L L M
L M H
Likelihood
75
Risk map profile
76
Risk management workshop
Efficiency Effectiveness
78
Fishbone Diagram
100
120
100 80
Percent
80
Count
60
60
40
40
20
20
0 0
Exception HHG TQ/TA GHS AT New Res Other
Count 73 18 13 8 7 5
Percent 58.9 14.5 10.5 6.5 5.6 4.0
Cum % 58.9 73.4 83.9 90.3 96.0 100.0
2019/11/11
Risk management workshop
Why do we Risk
Risk and
need risk assessment
control matrix
management process
Risk
COSO model management Risk reporting
policy
Risk management workshop
Design of RCM
Risk management workshop
Populating the
risk and control
matrix
Risk management workshop
Processing
controls
Risk management workshop
Output controls
Risk management workshop
Avoid
Accept
Risk
management
strategy Transfer
Mitigate
Risk management workshop
Set reward/loss
Cannot be avoided Intentionally
targets and
/ fully accepted pursue
tolerance levels
Typical risk
response Develop recovery
Investigate and
take follow-up
Develop fall-back
plans arrangements
strategies - action
Share (joint
Insure ventures, alliances,
partnerships)
Typical risk
response
Contract out
strategies - Diversify/spread
(outsource, assign)
Transfer
Hedge
Risk management workshop
Typical risk
response Change or
strategies - Divest recalibrate
objective
Avoid
Redesign (e.g.
Business processes, Reduce scale
systems, tools)
How do I choose the right mix of
responses?
Previous slides provide a ‘menu’ of choices. However, given that the
desired result is a structured and integrated portfolio of risk responses,
the choices must be carefully considered; intentional rather than ad
hoc, and linked together.
94
Entity level residual risk profile
Representative Example Residual
High 25.0 risk no. Tier 1 residual risks
overseas)
9
4 5 Failing to plan for LT
7
Inability to recruit and
6
10.0 retain talent
8
High dependency on
7 few decision-makers /
owners
Monitor Accept
5.0 Increased demand for
Risks Optimize more timely and
8 comprehensive
reporting and
disclosure
0.0
Low 9
Greater vulnerability re.
changes in economic
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 factors
95
Management action plans for key risks
Representative Example –Risk Action Plan Tracking
Key Business Risks Assess Improve Monitor
Risk Risk Classification Inherent Management Existing Management Enhancement Action Audit Other Monitoring Key
Risk Description Impact Likelihood Exposure Effectiveness and Control Activities Opportunities Owner Coverage Activity Metrics
Tier 1 Risk Profile
Raw Material Pricing: Operations 4.8 4.3 20.6 1.6
● ● ● ●
Purchases of raw materials, and energy represent a large portion Value Chain
of the Company’s costs. Increases in the costs of these inputs
may increase the Company’s costs, and the Company may not
be able to pass these costs on to customers through higher
prices. Increases in the costs of materials may adversely impact
our customers’ demand for printing and related services.
● ● ● ●
Slower-than-expected sales in the first two months of 2004 have Customer
nudged inventories slightly above the industry’s “normal” level of
60-day supply, increasing dealer carrying costs and the prospect
of production cuts later this year if the trend continues. Sales
incentives will remain high as a result, at least through the first
quarter of 2004, to mitigate a further rise in inventories that would
be even more expensive to clear out once new
GM/Ford/DaimlerChrysler car models start arriving later this year.
Warranty Costs and Liabiliites Operations 4.8 3.4 16.3 2.2
● ● ● ●
As manufacturers look to push warranty exposure down the Value Chain
supply chain, the risks for suppliers are potentially
catastrophic—the liability for a single component defect, spread
over a large number of vehicles, especially if the defect is
determined to be safety related, could jeopardize the future of a
company. The number of vehicle recalls is rising, and TREAD Act
compliance (a result of the Firestone/Ford debacle) in particular
is increasing costs for tire makers and vehicle manufacturers.
Integration of Acquired Businesses: Strategic 4.6 2.8 12.9 2.0
● ● ● ●
Achieving the anticipated benefits of acquisitions, including the Acquisition & Divestiture
recent acquisitions, will depend in part upon the Company’s
ability to integrate these businesses in an efficient and effective
manner. The integration of companies that have previously
operated independently may result in significant challenges, and
the Company may be unable to accomplish the integration
Supply Chain Sustainability: Operational 3.4 4.0 13.6 2.4
● ● ● ●
Many vehicle component suppliers have been pushed to the Value Chain
financial brink by years of cost-cutting by their customers. Many
suppliers have high debt levels, cash flow deficiencies, and
marginal businesses. In addition, Tier 1 suppliers face an
increasing risk that their production will be disrupted because
troubled second- and third-tier suppliers won’t be able to deliver
parts.
Intellectual Property Protection: Operational 3.4 3.7 12.6 2.4
● ● ● ●
The problem of counterfeit aftermarket parts being sold in the US Knowledge
market continues to increase, with most of the fraudulent parts
coming from China. The Chinese government has taken only
token steps to shore up the legal framework around intellectual
property rights in that country, and automakers and suppliers
remain under threat of having their IP rights subverted and
having little recourse against the proliferation of potential
dangerous fakes by enterprises that are difficult to bring to
96
Design, build and implementation of Key Risk Indicators
Example KPI, KCI and KRIs
Design
▪ Establish extent of existing management information and other Control:
Risk:
data flows – indicators in place if applicable Clients default on deals
Daily monitoring, Point of entry
▪ Identify committees, forums, management meetings etc procedures, Collateral cover
currently in place that can be used to discuss risk and control
issues on an ongoing basis
KPI: KCI:
▪ Define and document roles and responsibilities of risk and Number of deals executed for clients who Number of clients identified with
control owners have defaulted in the past insufficient collateral cover
Build Process
▪ Assign ownership for risks and controls KRI:
▪ Communication with risk and control owners relating to their Number of deals executed for clients who have defaulted in the past who do not
ongoing responsibilities have sufficient collateral cover
▪ Carry out workshops with all risk and control owners to design
indicators to be put in place
▪ Define how existing information flows and committees etc are to
be used to minimise additional workload Control:
▪ Risk and control owners refine the indicator monitoring process Risk: Adequate remuneration & motivation
▪ Overall analysis of indicators for gaps and dual coverage Loss of key personnel packages allied to communication.
▪ Design reporting protocols Bonus Pool
97
Risk management workshop
Why do we Risk
Risk and
need risk assessment
control matrix
management process
Risk
COSO model management Risk reporting
policy
Risk management workshop
Residual risk
versus risk
appetite
Risk management workshop
Why do we Risk
Risk and
need risk assessment
control matrix
management process
Risk
COSO model management Risk reporting
policy
Reporting and disclosures
105