Distrect assignnment 41
Distrect assignnment 41
≡ p ∧ (q ∨ ∼q) by (b)
≡ p ∧ t by (c)
≡ p by (d)
Therefore, (p ∧ ∼q) ∨ (p ∧ q) ≡ p.
≡ ∼q ∨ (p ∧ ∼p) by (b)
≡ ∼q ∨ c by (c)
≡ ∼q by (d)
PART (A):
(p ∧ ∼q) ∨ (p ∧ q) ≡ p ∧ (∼q ∨ q)
Step (a):
(p ∧ ∼q) ∨ (p ∧ q) ≡ p ∧ (∼q ∨ q)
Reason: Factorization. We can factor out the common term (p) from both parts of the disjunction.
(p ∧ ∼q) ∨ (p ∧ q) = p ∧ (∼q ∨ q)
p ∧ (∼q ∨ q) ≡ p ∧ (q ∨ ∼q)
Reason: Commutative law. Because the order of terms in a disjunction does not affect its truth
value, so we can change (∼q) and (q) in the disjunction.
Step (c)
( p ∧ (q ∨ ∼q) ≡ p ∧ t )
Reason: Tautology law . Because the expression (q ∨ ∼q) is always true so we can replace (q ∨
∼q) with t (which stands for "true").
Step (d)
(p∧t≡p)
Reason: Identity law. Because Conjunction with true leaves the original term unchanged (p ∧ t ≡
p).
Therefore, (p ∧ ∼q) ∨ (p ∧ q) ≡ p
PART (B):
Step (a)
Reason: Commutative law because the order of terms in a disjunction doesn't matter, so we can
change the terms in the first disjunction to get (∼q ∨ p) and change the terms in the second
disjunction to get (∼q ∨ ∼p).
2
Step (b)
Reason: Distribution law of disjunction over conjunction. because We can factor out the
common term (-q) from both parts of the disjunction.
Step (c)
∼q ∨ (p ∧ ∼p) ≡ ∼q ∨ c
Step (d)
( ∼q ∨ c) ≡ ∼q
Reason: Identity law. because the disjunction of any statement with false leaves the original
statement unchanged ( ∼q ∨ c ≡ ∼q ).
3
REFERENCES
Logical Equivalence. (2024, December). Retrieved from http/://www.GeeksforGeeks