“ELECTRONIC WASTE MANAGEMENT

OF BUY-BACK CENTERS IN
CABANATUAN CITY”
Kyle Richard M. Castillo
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
 INTRODUCTION
Cabanatuan City faces growing challenges in managing
electronic waste (e-waste) due to rising consumption of electronic
products. Buy-back centers collect, recycle, and repair e-waste, but
their efficiency, environmental impact, and economic viability
remains unclear. Improper e-waste disposal releases toxic substances
like lead and mercury, causing environmental and health risks. This
study evaluates the practices of buy-back centers in addressing these
risks while exploring opportunities for resource recovery, job creation,
and sustainable development. Proper recycling can reduce harm and
support economic growth in the city.
 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
GENERAL OBJECTIVE: SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:

✓To evaluate the 1. Describe the business profile of buy-back

centers.
environmental impact, 2. Identify the types and volume of electronic
effectiveness, and waste collected.
economic viability of 3. To determine the perceived health hazards
and environmental impacts of electronic waste
electronic waste (e- of buy-back centers in Cabanatuan City.
waste) management of 4. To describe the collection and processing
Cabanatuan City. practices of electronic waste.
5. To analyze the economic cost and revenue of
electronic waste recycling’s.
 INPUT
1. Profile of Buy-back Centers.
➢ Location, size, capacity, and operational OUTPUT
details. 1. Comprehensive Profile of Buy-back
➢ Staffing, expertise, and resources available. Centers.
2. Types and Volume of E-waste ✓ Overview of operations, capacity, and
Collected. resources of centers.
2. Detailed Overview of E-waste Types
➢ Types of electronic waste.
and Volume.
➢ Volume of e-waste handled monthly/annually.
PROCESS 3. Perceived health risks and safety
3. Health Hazards and environmental ➢ Data Collection recommendations.
impact associated with electronic -waste. and Analysis. 4. Practices in collection and processing
➢ Types of hazardous materials. efficiency.
➢ Reported health issues related to e-waste 5. Analysis of Economic Costs and
handling. Revenue in E-waste Management.
4. Collection and Processing Practices. ✓ Financial breakdown of costs and
➢ Job Collection methods and strategies. potential revenue streams for buy-
➢ Processing practices back centers.
5. Economic Aspects of E-waste 2. Recommendations for Sustainable E-
Management. waste Management Practices.
➢ Economic costs of operations.
➢ Revenue generated from e-waste management
activities.
 KEY HIGHLIGHTS OF THE STUDY
1. Significance of the Study
 Enhances operational efficiency, safety, and profitability of buy-back
centers.
 Guides policy development, raises public awareness, and promotes
sustainability in e-waste management.
2. Economic and Environmental Impact
 Highlights economic opportunities like job creation and material
recovery.
 Emphasizes reducing pollution through proper recycling and
sustainable practices.
 KEY HIGHLIGHTS OF THE STUDY
3. Time and Place
 Conducted in Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija, over six months.
 Data collected from buy-back center personnel through surveys and interviews.
4. Scope and Focus
 Assesses e-waste types, volumes, health risks, and economic viability.
 Limited to Cabanatuan City's buy-back centers for local relevance.
5. Key Limitations
 Relies on self-reported data from personnel, which may affect objectivity.
 Findings specific to Cabanatuan City, limiting generalization to other regions.
CHAPTER 2 REVIEW OF
RELATED LITERATURES
 REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURES

The literature emphasizes the need for effective waste

management to address urbanization, population growth, and
technological advancements. E-waste poses risks due to hazardous
materials, requiring structured recycling and material recovery. The
junkshop industry and community participation play key roles in
improving recycling and reducing environmental impact. Economic
factors like material recovery and revenue generation ensure
sustainability. Successful models, such as Payatas, highlight the
value of advanced technologies and public awareness. Adopting
these practices locally can address challenges in both urban and rural
areas.
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
 RESEARCH DESIGN

The study utilized a descriptive research design to evaluate the

environmental impact, effectiveness, and economic viability of
electronic waste (e-waste) management in buy-back centers in
Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija. This approach systematically analyzed
data to describe existing practices and conditions, such as the profile of
buy-back centers, types of e-waste managed, health hazards,
environmental impacts, collection methods, and economic aspects like
costs and revenues.
Data collection was carried out using a self-developed survey
instrument designed to gather both quantitative and qualitative
information relevant to the study’s objectives.
 SAMPLING METHOD

A purposive sampling method was employed,

targeting key personnel in buy-back centers, including
managers, staffs, and workers. These individuals were
selected for their direct involvement and expertise in e-
waste collection, processing, and recycling. This ensured
the study captured detailed and relevant insights into
operational practices, challenges, and economic aspects of
e-waste management.
 RESPONDENTS

Buy-back Center Personnel Number of Respondents

Center Managers

Collection Staff

Processing Workers

Administrative Staff
Total:
RESEARCH LOCALE
 DATA GATHERING INSTRUMENT

Part I: Business Profile of Buy-back Centers

 Collected demographic and operational details of the
buy-back centers, such as location, size, capacity,
staffing, resources, and respondent profiles (e.g., age,
gender, educational background, and role).
 DATA GATHERING INSTRUMENT

Part II: Awareness and Practices Regarding E-Waste Management

Assessed respondent awareness and practices in e-waste
management. Subsections included:
▪Types and Volume of E-Waste Collected: Evaluated using a four-
point Likert scale.
▪Health Hazards and Environmental Impacts: Measured awareness of
risks like toxic exposure and environmental degradation.
▪Collection and Processing Practices: Assessed familiarity with and
implementation of best practices in e-waste management.
 DATA GATHERING INSTRUMENT

Part III: Economic Cost and Revenue Analysis

Gathered data on operational costs and revenues
from recycling, supplemented with interviews for
additional financial insights where records were
unavailable.
 LIKERT SCALE

SCALE VERBAL DESCRIPTION

4 Highly Effective/Highly Aware

3 Effective/Aware
2 Ineffective/Unaware
1 Highly Ineffective/Highly Unaware
 INTERPRETATION OF THE FINDINGS

SCALE VERBAL VERBAL

RANGE DESCRIPTION INTERPRETATION
3.26 – 4.00 Highly aware High

2.51 – 3.25 Aware Moderate

1.76 – 2.50 Unaware Low
1.00 – 1.75 Highly unaware Very low
END!
THANK YOU!