0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

Lab Design

Uploaded by

Abhishek
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

Lab Design

Uploaded by

Abhishek
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with

free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-


19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the
company's public news and information website.

Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related


research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this
research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other
publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights
for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means
with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are
granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre
remains active.
Practical Aspects and
Considerations When
Planning a New Clinical
M i c ro b i o l o g y L a b o r a t o r y
Dwight J. Hardy, PhD

KEYWORDS
 Microbiology lab  Lab design  Biosafety  Open floor plan  Shared space
 Flexible space  Lab infrastructure

KEY POINTS
 The scope and success of the new laboratory requires clarity and the combined vision of
hospital, departmental, and laboratory leadership.
 You do not have to be an architect or a builder/contractor, but you do need to be able to
clearly articulate specific space needs.
 An issue with open floor plans is to ensure that the space is not so cavernous so as to
overwhelm our human need for feeling proportionate to and comfortable in the space.
 With the opportunity of new space, plan to locate equipment, instruments, and worksta-
tions for greatest efficiency gains depending on workflow and technical assignments.
 Do not assume anything, never be afraid to ask questions and challenge what you believe
is incorrect.

So it’s finally your turn. After what may have been years of discussions that often
seemed to go nowhere, funding for a new a new laboratory for your department has
now been approved. You can only hope that the funding will allow for your current
and future overall space needs, as well as correct long-standing problems that served
to impede workflow and efficiencies. This article is written after more than 30 years of
first-hand experience as a laboratory director working most of that time in “old” space
with late twentieth century upgrades at best and more recently charged with planning
for a new laboratory in an off-campus building undergoing renovations and expansion
to accommodate a centralized laboratory for a growing health system. This review is
not intended to replace detailed authoritative reviews on the topic of laboratory design
and safety, but to put forward an experience-based user-friendly approach to thought
processes and important points to remember for a successful new laboratory space.

Clinical Microbiology Laboratories, UR Medicine Labs, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,


University of Rochester Medical Center, Box 710, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Rochester, NY 14642-
8710, USA
E-mail address: [email protected]

Clin Lab Med 40 (2020) 421–431


https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2020.08.015 labmed.theclinics.com
0272-2712/20/ª 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
422 Hardy

PREPARATION

The first question a laboratory director or chief supervisor should ask is “what’s the
scope of the project?” Are you planning a laboratory for a single or multiple hospitals?
What menu and volume of testing will the new laboratory be required to perform to
support the needs of the various hospitals with different specialty programs? Will
the new laboratory support all inpatient and outpatient testing, or outpatient testing
only? How many years will elapse between planning and occupying the new labora-
tory? For how many years to come will the laboratory be expected to serve the needs
of the health system? How much annual growth should you expect over the next 5 or
10 or 20 years and are you allowed to plan for such growth? While you can participate
in discussions aimed at providing answers to such questions, the combined vision and
input of hospital and departmental leadership is mandatory. Likewise, if the central-
ized laboratory is “off-site” from 1 or more hospitals, it is necessary to have agreement
on what testing capabilities will remain at the individual hospitals; distance from hos-
pitals to the new central laboratory and frequency and dependability of courier service
will be key factors in determining what testing remains at individual hospitals in the
system. Without clarity on these issues, the end product, that is, the new laboratory,
will likely not meet present and future needs of the organization.
Armed with answers to at least some of these questions, the next question is “where
do I begin?” It’s time to prepare yourself for numerous meetings with laboratory
administration, hospital space planning, contract space planners, architects, multiple
project managers, and so on. While waiting to be introduced to members of the design
and planning team identify the major players associated with the project, learn their
names and roles and make sure that they come to know you. Plan to attend meetings
of the various working groups assigned to plan for your area. If you show little interest
in the overall project, decisions that will significantly impact your space and operation
for years to come will be made without your input. If not already familiar to you, copies
of key references that address important design issues should become part of your
daily reading routine.1–3 Don’t be surprised if without consulting you, you are pre-
sented with a draft plan for your space and be prepared to offer rebuttal or alternate
proposals; the quicker you are with your response to draft proposals the more seri-
ously your proposals will be considered and the more willing planners may be to
walk back from proposals that have already begun to take shape.
Early in the process of planning for new space, recognize that this is not a 1-person
job and assemble your own team of supervisors and technologists who have a knack
for identifying space needs, workflow problems, efficiencies, and solutions. Know your
current space and what you need from new space, that is, more space, flexible space,
better designed space for work efficiency, and so on (no one knows this better than
you and your team). A good place to start is to look closely, dispassionately, and
objectively at the space you currently occupy with an eye toward determining what’s
good about it, what is OK but can be improved, and what is really bad and must
change. Because you or someone unknown to you will be required to provide current
square feet occupied, you should take careful accurate measurements of the space
you currently occupy. You should take measurements of current laboratory space
including obvious and not so obvious storage space, and areas frequently omitted
by space planners, that is, hallways where freezers, refrigerators, and supply cabinets
are currently stored, an extra closet space here and there that you may have acquired
over the years but is not officially recorded in space surveys held by laboratory or hos-
pital administration. Making this assessment and taking these measurements is not for
the purpose of re-creating the space you currently occupy but to give you an idea of
Practical Aspects and Considerations 423

overall current space needs. Indeed, in a new space which is better planned, your cur-
rent and future needs may fit into a space that is smaller than you might predict (don’t
count on it, but it is within the realm of possibility).
With the opportunity of new space, plan to locate equipment, instruments, and
workstations for greatest efficiency gains depending on workflow and technical as-
signments. Consider each and every bench top and floor-standing instrument and
where it should be placed with input from technologists who perform the actual bench
work of the laboratory for maximum operational efficiency and minimization of steps.
Where possible, plan to colocate low-volume workstations that are the responsibility
of a single technologist for enhanced ability to multitask and cross-cover. In times of
shortages of licensed medical technologists, consider placing continuous monitoring
blood culture instruments in preanalytical areas proximal to nonlicensed staff who may
perform non–license-requiring activities, that is, load culture bottles, unload positive
culture bottles, and unload negative culture bottles at the end of default incubation
times.

ADJUSTING TO AN OPEN FLOOR PLAN

Be prepared to be presented with a vision for your laboratory space that is created by
space planners and architects. The vision will likely be that of a large open space with
movable work benches that offer flexibility and the ability to quickly respond to chang-
ing needs, for example, replace a movable bench with a floor model instrument in a
day without requiring major renovations. Open floor plans can also enhance commu-
nication and cooperation among various work stations throughout the laboratory. For
example, if anaerobic bacterial culture is a separate workstation it should be located
near other workstations that have the greatest likelihood of having a companion anaer-
obic culture. Some disadvantages of large open floor plans, however, include noise
and distractions from staff and instrumentation in adjacent areas, noise and distrac-
tions created by foot traffic from staff in proximal areas, and a general inability to
adjust lighting and room temperature unless the ability for zone control of HVAC
and lighting is included in the design to accommodate the comfort level of all staff. Un-
less you are able to successfully argue for a different approach to space design, a
large open floor plan is likely the approach that will be used; after what may be an initial
shock from seeing such a plan and the realization of how different it is from current
space, consider the advantages of this design and how to mitigate the disadvantages
of this design approach. A key issue with large open floor plans is to make sure that the
space is not so cavernous so as to have the feel of a warehouse and overwhelm our
human need for feeling proportionate to and comfortable in the space. With open floor
plans, it is also important to consider the use of materials for walls, floors and ceilings
that absorb noise and/or lighting to minimize distractions. In such designs it may also
be necessary to implement a plan for traffic flow that minimizes distractions and the
potential for laboratory accidents, for example, some areas may be open to all traffic,
some areas open to 1-way traffic only and some areas may be “no thru traffic” to limit
traffic to staff working in the immediate area only.

BIOSAFETY

In keeping with minimal safety requirements, clinical microbiology laboratories must


be designed for working with biosafety level (BSL)-2 level pathogens and require stra-
tegically located biological safety cabinets (BSC) for primary specimen setup, conduct
of aerosol-generating procedures and recognition of pathogens requiring higher
safety level practices. To protect against laboratory-acquired infections and maintain
424 Hardy

specimen integrity, laboratories should perform all primary specimen setup in a BSC.
Separate from standard unidirectional flow of air from corridors into BSL-2 laboratory
space (and from BSL-2 into BSL-3 spaces), which is a non-negotiable requirement, a
design feature of the laboratory to be introduced to the planning team early in the pro-
cess is the partitioning of Microbiology space from other laboratory areas.1 The type of
partition and the approach to partitioning depends on desired objectives. If not already
part of the design team, Environmental Health and Safety (EH&S) should be a required
participant in any and all discussions related to laboratory design and safety; if EH&S
has not been invited to participate in such discussion, you should invite them. If the
objective is to completely separate Microbiology’s space from other laboratory areas
in the event of an aerosol-generating laboratory accident, a separate and independent
HVAC system is required along with sealed partition walls that cover from floor to deck
(ie, the solid impermeable layer above the ceiling tiles). Although a partitioning wall can
block airflow and light transmission between areas, glass or other light-permitting ma-
terials can not only prevent aerosol movements but can also allow for an open feel to
the space and ameliorate a feeling of being “boxed in.” It is noteworthy that a separate
air handling system with walls from floor to deck adds significant cost to the overall
project. If, however, the objective of a partitioning wall is to provide “some” protection
against infectious aerosol movements from one space to another, a partitioning wall
from floor to ceiling tile with an HVAC system that has easily accessible controls for
shutting down airflow from the Microbiology Laboratory can be incorporated into
the space design; this design can allow for a quick laboratory evacuation and may
be a practical compromise for laboratories in which the likelihood of such accidents
is extremely low.
Throughout BSL-2 laboratory areas include space for the placement of BSCs prox-
imal to appropriate work areas, for example, specimen setup; for maximum worker
safety, all specimens should be setup in a BSC with separate BSC for setup of sterile
site specimens and nonsterile site specimens. Include a BSC for workup of positive
blood cultures proximal to blood culture instruments (if inside the partitioned microbi-
ology space) and instruments for molecular identification of organisms in positive cul-
ture bottles. For maximum worker safety, include BSCs throughout the laboratory for
the examination and workup of cultures potentially growing agents of high-risk for
laboratory-acquired infections and/or environmental contamination (eg, Legionella
pneumophila, Neisseria meningitidis, Brucella, Francisella, Burkholderia mallei/pseu-
domallei, unsuspected molds, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
[SARS-CoV-2]) or handling of specimens requiring procedures with potential for aero-
sol generation. Although laboratory procedures have largely transitioned away from
potentially toxic chemicals such as formalin and formaldehyde for safety reasons,
any new laboratory should still have at least 1 chemical fume hood for current proced-
ures as well as procedures that might be used in the future.

SPECIMEN RECEIVING

Within the brick and mortar of the clinical laboratory space, specimen receiving is
where it all begins. Whether specimens are received by pneumatic tube systems, in-
ternal transporters, or external couriers, ample space is required for the registration
and accessioning of specimens upon arrival in the laboratory. With regard to specimen
receiving and accessioning for microbiological specimens, a distinct space for Micro-
biology Specimen Receiving (MSR) should be maintained recognizing that this func-
tion is a specialty area requiring dedicated and experienced staff. MSR can be
safely located outside of the partitioned space defining Microbiology because
Practical Aspects and Considerations 425

specimens remain in sealed containers preferably in individual zip-lock bags during


log-in and accessioning activities. It is important for MSR to be proximal to or adjacent
to where all specimens are delivered by couriers or pneumatic tube systems. Prox-
imity to specimen receiving for other laboratory specimens and other preanalytical
areas is also ideal when it comes to sharing clinical specimens, including but not
limited to urine, body fluids and blood, and for sendouts to reference laboratories.
Proximity to these receiving areas can be helpful for patient registrations that are
required even before specimens for microbiology can be accessioned. When planning
for MSR in laboratories, consideration should be given to locating automated blood
culture systems in that area to allow preanalytical staff to load blood culture bottles
immediately after receipt in the laboratory; culture bottles can be unloaded by preana-
lytical staff from the automated system when instrument-flagged positive and trans-
ferred to adjacent areas for workup by medical technologists.

SPECIMEN TRIAGE AND STAT TESTING

The next logical step for specimens from the MSR area is a triage workstation located
within the partitioned microbiology laboratory space that should be immediately adja-
cent to MSR. Ample space for unopened specimen triage is important to directing
specimens to a nearby STAT station or other routine processing stations deeper
into the laboratory. A STAT workstation near specimen receiving with BSC(s) allows
for rapid turnaround for procedures such as Gram stain, lateral flow immunochromato-
graphic tests (ie, for detection of human immunodeficiency virus, malaria, Legionella,
Streptococcus pneumoniae, Clostridium difficile), and molecular instrumentation for
detection of a variety of infectious agents, including but not limited to influenza virus,
respiratory syncytial virus, SARS-CoV-2, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,
C difficile toxin, and Group A Streptococcus.

SPECIMEN SETUP: BACTERIOLOGY AND MYCOLOGY

It may be efficient to perform manual setup of bacterial and fungal cultures in the STAT
area with incubation of inoculated media in the same area or transfer of inoculated me-
dia to the inner laboratory for incubation. All specimen setup should be performed
within BSCs and consideration should be given to providing separate BSCs for setup
of sterile site specimens versus nonsterile specimens. If design of new space presents
opportunity for installation of a total automated system for culture setup, incubation,
and workup, complete specifications of the automated system should be given to
space planners at the earliest possible time. Furthermore, vendor experts should be
in personal communication with space planners to ensure that the space is appro-
priate to precisely accommodate large and expensive equipment with fixed and
very specific power and information technology (IT) needs to avoid costly design
missteps.

VIROLOGY AND MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY

Over the course of a few short years, testing for viruses has transitioned from a tissue
culture–based laboratory with dedicated technologists highly trained in the specifics
of tissue culture and cytopathic effects to a largely molecular operation. This includes
manual “open” laboratory-developed molecular tests requiring expertise in nucleic
acid extraction, amplification and detection to commercially available “closed” molec-
ular test platforms that require general but little specific knowledge of targeted viral
agents. Instrumentation performing molecular testing for many viruses is not specific
426 Hardy

to virology and is often placed the STAT area of the microbiology laboratory for rapid
testing on a 24/7 basis. Routine molecular testing for other viruses, such as those
causing gastrointestinal disease, is also included in test platforms not specific to
virology, that is, platforms that detect bacterial, parasitic and viral agents, that can
be placed in areas of the microbiology laboratory convenient for cross-coverage by
technologists from other subdisciplines of microbiology. When locating test platforms
for any infectious agent recall that the maximum promise of molecular technology is
achieved only when these platforms are not powered down and locked up at the
end of the day shift, which means such test platforms should be convenient to evening
and night shift personnel.
Other high-volume molecular tests such as for the detection of agents of sexually
transmitted diseases can be located in areas of the laboratory that serve best advan-
tage for efficiencies, cross-coverage, and testing on different shifts. Molecular tests
for viruses that are performed on platforms used only for the detection of viral agents
can be colocated in areas of the laboratory where there is advantage for cross-
coverage and other efficiencies. These examples serve to illustrate that with the intro-
duction of commercially available “closed” molecular amplification test systems,
testing for some infectious agents can be located in discipline-neutral areas of the
microbiology laboratory as long as content experts are readily accessible and sup-
portive equipment, for example, BSC, is conveniently located and provided in quanti-
ties necessary to meet the test volume need. It is also important to emphasize that per
current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines and recommendations,
the processing of specimens for routine SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing can be safely
performed in BSC within a BSL-2 laboratory by staff trained in sterile technique and
practices requiring careful and nimble manipulations. Although molecular test plat-
forms may be located in different areas of the clinical laboratory, the example of
SARS-CoV-2 underscores the importance of locating molecular tests for diagnosis
of infectious diseases with the content experts in clinical microbiology.
The introduction of commercially available Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-
cleared products and test platforms for molecular amplification of an ever-growing
list of infectious agents has reduced the need for “PCR suites” in clinical microbiology
laboratories with 1-way traffic and separate rooms dedicated to reagent preparation,
extraction, amplification and amplicon detection which are all part of open laboratory-
developed tests. The experience of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), however,
reminds us that the availability of such space is one factor that allows for the rapid cre-
ation and implementation of laboratory-developed tests where commercially available
FDA-cleared tests do not exist. Not all laboratories may need such space, but, larger
regional laboratories and academic-based laboratories should consider including
such space in planning for new facilities.

MYCOLOGY AND MYCOBACTERIOLOGY (SECTIONS WITH BIOSAFETY LEVEL-3


CONSIDERATIONS)

From what might be described as a central or core BSL-2 laboratory space, an adjacent
space or suite for separate BLS-3 laboratories for mycology and mycobacteriology can
make for good workflow patterns. A single anteroom off of the core BSL-2 laboratory with
separate entry into separate laboratories for mycology and mycobacteriology can save
space. The need for separate spaces for these specialty areas depends on the type of
laboratory and patient populations served by the laboratory. Laboratories that only cul-
ture yeasts may not need BSL-3 mycology space, whereas laboratories that culture
specimens from severely immunocompromised patients at risk for spore-forming molds
Practical Aspects and Considerations 427

such as Histoplasma and Coccidioides and workup such cultures require BSL-3 space.
Similarly, laboratories that serve severely immunocompromised patients at risk for myco-
bacterial infections, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis, require BSL-3 level space.
The design of BSL-3 space should strictly adhere to efficient workflow and recommenda-
tions for required square footage per person so as to prevent crowding, which may lead to
laboratory accidents.1 Include space for as many BSCs as required to safely perform
work and keep “dirty” procedures, for example, processing and decontamination of
specimens, from “clean” procedures, for example, culture workup. Positioning these 2
laboratories in adjacent spaces allows for cross-coverage of those laboratories and
can also make for the efficient location of separate double-door autoclaves in each lab-
oratory that empty into a common discharge area.

SEROLOGY

Serologic testing for antibodies/antigens of infectious agents and for markers of auto-
immune diseases use bench top test platforms or large floor model instruments.
Bench top platforms using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technology require
places for microplate setup, plate washers, plate readers, and other standard small
equipment, such as vortexers, water baths, centrifuges, and PC work station, which
when taken in totality can require more than 6 feet of linear bench. If possible, equip-
ment common to such workstations should be placed between or proximal to test
setup for different assays to share the equipment and avoid duplication of equipment
(although some redundancy in equipment is desired). Larger floor model platforms
should be placed such that equipment has sufficient “breathing” space and can
also be accessed from sides and back for maintenance and repairs; these large
high-volume instruments should be directly connected to distilled/deionized water
as needed and be proximal to floor drains for waste drainage. When positioning any
of these platforms, consideration should be given to cross-coverage by technologists
for maximum efficiencies. Storage space for liter or larger qualities of buffers and re-
agents for these platforms should be nearby.
Serologic testing follows the same testing guidelines for all BSL-2 activities. Splash/
spray of specimens when uncapping specimen tubes is a major concern for avoiding
laboratory-acquired infections. Providing ample bench space with fixed or movable
splash guards or BSC (as deemed necessary) and centrifuges with containment for
specimen preparation and test execution is sufficient per current safety recommenda-
tions. After specimen centrifugation in closed containers, testing with large floor model
instruments provides containment for actual testing and has the advantage of waste
drains that empty directly into floor drains for minimizing contact with potentially infec-
tious material.
After years of performing fluorescent or dark-field microscopy in sub-standard inade-
quate space be sure to plan for a room to house fluorescent microscopes within the BSL-
2 laboratory space. For efficient use of space, include microscopes to examine fluoro-
chrome stains for mycobacteria, calcofluor stains for fungi, immunofluorescent stains
for viruses, and immunofluorescent stains for markers of autoimmune diseases (eg, anti-
nuclear antibody, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody). Locating microscopes for these
various stains in the same room can succeed if different work groups can “play well
together” and schedule nonconflicting times during the workday for use of the room.

SHARED SPACES

A feature frequently incorporated into new laboratory design is that of “shared” space.
If you’re told that freezers that will not require daily or frequent access will be stored in
428 Hardy

a shared “freezer farm,” be sure to make your space and electrical needs known and
argue for the location of such shared space to be proximal to the laboratory. Similarly,
if you’re told that shared storage space for dry goods and items, including test kits,
which can be stored at room temperature is incorporated into the new design, be
sure to make your needs known and argue for location of such shared space to be
proximal to the major laboratory sections. For refrigerated items, the strategic place-
ment of floor model refrigerators throughout the laboratory for storage of small items
near point-of-use is certainly advantageous. Be prepared, however, to argue that in-
dividual floor model refrigerators do not substitute for walk-in cold rooms. Refrigerated
storage of commercially prepared media used in high volumes and large boxes/car-
tons of test kits do not fit efficiently into floor model refrigerator units. Involve individ-
uals from Supply Chain in this discussion because they will likely be responsible for
stocking, inventory management, and transport of supplies from cold rooms, which
should be immediately accessible to point-of-use areas within the laboratory. If Supply
Chain or Inventory Management is not involved in the laboratory design process from
the outset, be sure to bring them into the discussion and invite them to meetings early
in the process to ensure adequate and proximal storage space; it’s unfortunate, but
architects and planners may be more likely to listen to Supply Chain than to you
when planning for storage space. The experience of COVID-19 and its impact on sup-
ply chain disruptions documents the failure of just-in-time delivery for basic laboratory
products and the need for ample space to store routine and esoteric items necessary
for operation of laboratories in “normal” times and in times of epidemic/pandemic out-
breaks. Shared space can also include space for waste storage, which is often over-
looked and underestimated; left to nonmicrobiologists, space for waste storage will
likely be insufficient for weekends and holiday weekends when waste pickup is less
frequent. Another aspect of shared space can also include space for record retention
and storage.

TEACHING AND TELEMEDICINE

Designing and building a new laboratory provides an opportunity to include adequate


and appropriate space for teaching. The kind, amount, and design of teaching space
required by an individual laboratory depends on several factors, including the different
categories of students and/or trainees, the number of students in each category and
the nature of the teaching required to satisfy the learning experience for each cate-
gory. For example, space needs for teaching students of medical technology may
require a classroom for the delivery of didactic lectures and a space to perform micro-
scopy and wet laboratory exercises, which is separate from the space where routine
clinical work is performed. Another example of teaching by a clinical laboratory in
terms of space needs includes “shadowing” of experienced technologists by newly
hired technologists or residents from different specialties in which the required educa-
tional experience can be achieved by observation; such teaching may be accommo-
dated at existing work benches in the clinical laboratory or may require an additional
“teaching bench” within the footprint of the clinical laboratory, but does not require a
classroom or separate wet teaching laboratory. Although different from in-person
teaching, recent experience with COVID-19 has demonstrated that the clinical labora-
tory must also provide a learning experience to off-site participants including students,
attendees of clinical rounds and medical conferences, and staff of affiliate laboratories
by remote transmission (eg, Zoom) of lectures, case presentations, and plate rounds
with still or real-time high-resolution macroscopic and microscopic images4; such
technology can also be used by affiliate laboratories to transmit images to a core
Practical Aspects and Considerations 429

laboratory for review by more experienced central laboratory based technologists.5


The IT needs for remote teaching from the clinical laboratory may be met by software
on personal computers available in an office or conference room. Similarly, the clinical
laboratory should have a sufficient number of small and large conference rooms that
can be shared by all laboratory disciplines and that can accommodate the receiving of
remote seminars, clinical rounds, and conferences for the educational experience of
laboratory faculty and technologists.

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

When planning for a new laboratory, it is important to consider the number of required
work benches and what constitutes appropriate space per bench. It is not unreason-
able to plan for a minimum of 6 linear feet of bench top per designated workstation
with 1 or 2 shelves of similar length above the bench and shelf/drawer unit below
the bench for storage of protocol binders and materials required for that workstation;
locate benchtop equipment such as centrifuges and microscopes on 6-foot benches
proximal to where needed. Also include separate and dedicated bench/desk areas for
the performance of quality control (QC) activities required for new lots and shipments
of media and test reagents/kits, quality assurance activities, special projects; if need in
the area of QC, including media assessment and preparation, is sufficiently large a
separate room adjacent to the core laboratory may be warranted. As you plan for
the workspace, make sure to include sufficient number of electrical outlets for required
equipment and ancillary devices (eg, computer/keyboard/barcode scanner; monitor;
computer printer; label printers for Laboratory Information System (LIS), antimicrobial
susceptibility testing (AST), and total laboratory automation (TLA) systems; bench top
lamp; electric incinerators for sterilizing loops; heat block; vortex; slide warmer;)
because each workstation can have 5 to 10 devices requiring electricity; request
that electrical outlets be placed to the left and to the right side of the bench to avoid
long electrical cords or use of extension cords spanning across the work bench. Simi-
larly, include sufficient number of IT ports for each workstation (eg, computer, printer,
label printers, other ancillary devices) and instrument remote access. Don’t forget to
include IT connection for phone at each workstation requiring a phone. Does your lab-
oratory use natural gas for sterile flaming? Does your laboratory operation require in-
house vacuum and/or in-house deionized or distilled water connections? Remember
that the cost to install electrical outlets and IT ports for computer, telephones, printers,
ancillary devices, as well as natural gas jets, vacuum jests, deionized or distilled water
connections is significantly less (a fraction of the cost) when installed at the time of
construction versus after construction is complete. Indeed, it may not be possible
due to infrastructure challenges or cost to install new or additional electrical outlets,
IT drops, water or gas connections, and/or plumbing drains after construction is
complete.
When planning for equipment, instruments, and people, remember to consider tem-
perature requirements for optimal operation and function (and this includes people).
Where practical and possible attempt to incorporate independent temperature zones
for individual comfort and instrument/equipment performance. Computerized and
distant temperature monitoring of spaces and instruments relieves laboratory staff
from manually monitoring and recording of such information and is a desired feature
in any new space.
Be sure to include strategically located clean and dirty sinks throughout the labora-
tory, as well, as hand-washing sinks near exits to encourage frequent hand washing
and overall good and safe hygiene practices. For instruments that require distilled
430 Hardy

or deionized water for reagent mixing, have water lines placed proximally. For
maximum flexibility, have floor drains placed proximal to the planned placement of in-
struments that have waste drains to avoid having to lift and empty large carboys of
waste water/reagents/specimens into dirty sinks causing splashing and injured backs;
for greatest flexibility have additional floor drains placed throughout the laboratory in
the event space needs change and equipment needs to be moved.
Planning for new laboratory space may allow for the incorporation of long sought
after instruments and platforms that current space was unable to accommodate.
Don’t forget to plan for these needs because the opportunity for additional space
may not come around again anytime soon. For something as large and complex as
a total automated platform for setup, incubation, reading, and workup of cultures be
sure to bring together the system manufacturer with building project management
and electrical consultants to hear first-hand of specific needs and requirements;
don’t leave the placement and infrastructure support of such a large, complex, and
expensive system to “middle men” communicating to content experts via e-mail.
Be prepared to provide copies of electrical and IT specifications/requirements for
each instrument in the laboratory. Although generally obvious that differences be-
tween 110 V versus 220 V must be taken into account, differences between plug con-
figurations on each instrument must also be taken into account. Keep copies of all
information you provide to planners, architects, and project managers because you
will likely be requested to send the same information to other individuals or requested
to re-send the same information to the same individuals. All new construction should
include provision of normal electrical power, as well as emergency backup power. It
would be simple and easy to say that all laboratory equipment, instruments, and work-
stations require emergency electrical backup power. Because that approach may be
cost prohibitive to some projects, consider each instrument, each workstation, and
each piece of equipment to determine whether it is imperative for the real-time delivery
of patient care and employee safety. In brief, all instruments and systems absolutely
required for patient care and employee safety should be on emergency electrical
backup, for example, all continuous monitoring blood culture incubators/cabinets
and controllers, instrumentation required for delivery of STAT testing for inpatients
and emergency department patients (think influenza virus testing), all BSCs and all
fans responsible for maintaining negative pressure in laboratory spaces. In addition,
a significant number of PCs with ancillary devices connecting to LIS (but not neces-
sarily all) should be on emergency electrical back, where duplicate instrumentation ex-
ists for high-volume non-STAT testing (think sexually transmitted disease testing) 1 of
2 or more instruments should be considered for backup power, whereas pencil sharp-
eners do not require such backup. Each laboratory needs to develop a conscious plan
that takes into account every piece of equipment and balances needs versus cost.
Some new construction also includes electrical line conditioning for the entire building,
which combined with facility-provided emergency power backup, can obviate the
need for an individual Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) connected to each large in-
strument in the laboratory. Consult with the project managers and electrical consul-
tants to determine the precise specifications of what your facility will provide. If the
building provides dependable instantaneous electrical backup and continuous line
conditioning, why clutter floor space with unnecessary UPS that will just attract and
trap dust bunnies?
Last, office space for directors, supervisors, and support staff specific to clinical
microbiology should be immediately adjacent to the laboratory to make for easy
first-hand observations and communication with technologists. Locating offices in
nonadjacent areas will result in delayed or lost opportunities for positively impacting
Practical Aspects and Considerations 431

patient care. In addition, locating offices immediately adjacent to the laboratory allows
for directors and supervisors to be visible, available, and accessible to technologists
and assists in improving overall staff satisfaction and performance.

DISCLOSURE

The author has nothing to disclose.

REFERENCES

1. Miller JM, Astles R, Baszler T, et al. Guidelines for safe work practices in human
and animal medical diagnostic laboratories. Recommendations of a CDC-
convened, Biosafety Blue Ribbon Panel. MMWR Suppl 2012;61(01):1–101.
2. Doern CD, Holfelder M. Automation and design of the clinical microbiology labo-
ratory. In: Manual of clinical microbiology. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2015.
3. CLSI. Laboratory design. In: CLSI standard QMSO4. 3rd edition. Wayne (PA): Clin-
ical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2016.
4. Pentella M, Weinstein MP, Beckmann SE, et al. Impact of changes in clinical micro-
biology laboratory location and ownership of the practice of infectious diseases.
J Clin Micobiol 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01508-19.
5. Martinez RM. Remote technical review of blood culture gram stains at a large in-
tegrated healthcare network. J Appl Lab Med 2019;3(4):733–4.

You might also like