Out
Out
W
TATJANA HAQUE IE
Thesis subm itted in fulfilment of the requirem ents
EV
December 1999
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
EW
a note will indicate the deletion.
uest.
I
EV
PR
ProQuest U643805
ProQuest LLC
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346
ABSTRACT
W
The Gonoshasthaya Kendra programme aims to challenge the myths and
IE
misinterpretations surrounding appropriate roles for women in Bangladeshi society. It
does this by offering non-traditional employment training for women. Participants are
trained in skilled manual and technical trades and services such as welding, carpentry,
EV
a space for women to establish collective social relationships. These offer women a
source of social support which can complement or even replace family and kinship
networks. They can also form the basis for collective action in pursuit of women's
interests. The experience of Gonoshasthaya Kendra women serves to demonstrate to
their families and communities that alternative gender roles are possible in Bangladesh.
W
Ann Varley for her emotional and supervisory support, critique and patience with
my often incomprehensible German way of structuring my sentences.
IE
Phil Crang and Jacquie Burgess for advice on methodology and thesis structure.
All the people I had met and become friends with through the European Network of
Bangladesh Studies.
EV
Abstract 2
Acknowledgements 3
Table o f contents 4
List o f tables 8
List o f figures and plates 9
Frontispiece 10
W
............................................... 22
IE
2.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 22
2.2 Women, gender relations and em p o w erm en t........................... 22
2.3 The concept of empowerment ..................................................... 26
2.3.1 Different understandings of power ................................. 26
EV
e m p o w erm en t................................................................................ 45
2.8 Conclusion ..................................................................................... 48
W
4.11.1 Personal background..................... 109
4.11.2 Household profile....................... 112
4.11.3 Poverty profile.......................... 118
IE
4.12 Conclusion ...................................................................................... 120
7.1
7.2
W
Introduction .................................................................................
Behavioural codes for Bangladeshi women’s b o d ie s .............
233
235
IE
7.3 Bodily practices of empowerment ........................................... 237
7.3.1 Raising v o ic e s.................................................................. 238
7.3.2 Communicating with n o n -re la tiv e s............................ 247
7.3.3 Crossing the boundaries of village la n g u a g e ............ 250
EV
W
IE
Appendix One: Basic profile o f coreinterview ees...................................... 308
Appendix Two: Interview th e m e s ................................................................. 309
Appendix Three: Q uestionnaire...................................................................... 312
Appendix Four: Example o f a m in d m a p ..................................................... 315
EV
A bbreviations.......................................................................................................... 319
PR
4.1 Nari Kendra workshops: production, m arkets and skill training . . 104
4.2 Reasons for m ig ra tio n .............................................................................. 109
4.3 Age of all women a t Gonoshasthaya Kendra and t r a i n e e s ............... 110
4.4 Population, households and literacy rates in Dhamsona Union . . . Ill
4.5 E d u c a tio n ................................................................................................... Ill
4.6 Educational status of women working a t Gonoshasthaya Kendra . Ill
4.7 M arital s t a t u s ............................................................................................ 112
4.8 Age a t m arriage of ever-married women a t Gonoshasthaya
Kendra ....................................................................................................... 113
4.9 Age of currently unm arried w o m e n ....................................................... 114
4.10 Children ...................................................................................................... 115
4.11 Place of residence ..................................................................................... 115
4.12 Type of h o u se h o ld ..................................................................................... 116
4.13 N ature of nuclear h o u se h o ld ................................................................... 117
4.14 N ature of extended h o u se h o ld ................................................................ 118
W
4.15 Land o w nership.......................................................................................... 119
4.16 Landholding of women working at Gonoshasthaya Kendra ............. 120
5.1 Women’s reasons for seeking work in Gonoshashtaya Kendra . . . . 129
IE
5.2 Who took decision for the women to come to Gonoshasthaya
Kendra? ..................................................................................................... 130
5.3 Who objected to the woman going to work at Gonoshasthaya
Kendra? ..................................................................................................... 130
EV
W
LIST OF PLATES
1.1 Woman at w o r k .................................................................................... 10
IE
4.1 Map of Bangladesh showing location of Gonoshasthaya
K endra................................................................................................... 75
7.3 + 7.4 GK women preparing for the march in Cox’s Bazaar ..................... 241
7.7 + 7.8 Women during the march and in the p a r k ..................................... 245
I EW
EV
PR
10
Chapter One: Introduction
W
wage dependency as a result of increased pauperisation trends (Akhter 1995,
McCarthy and Feldman 1983, W estergaard 1983). M arket forces and m ainstream
development institutions claim to have ‘discovered’ rural women as under-utilised
IE
hum an resources (McCarthy and Feldman 1983). One can witness this trend
particularly in growing new industries such as the garm ent factories, where
EV
women’s abundant cheap labour is being fed into. And the development
establishm ent - in line with adjustm ent policies of the 1980s - is training up poor
women (and men) into becoming ‘self-sufficient’ by incorporating them into
PR
11
Gonoshasthaya Kendra (GK), th at provide such women with an alternative home.
The transform ation of rural landscapes in Bangladesh, however, has not only
resulted in the devaluation of women’s former roles in subsistence production.
The current climate in Bangladesh has great potential for changing gender
relations. Women are dealing with alternative roles and have become visible and
active social agents, negotiating multiple identities. Some NGOs in Bangladesh
have opened up new opportunities for women. Access to organisational support
networks have encouraged women to challenge existing cultural and patriarchal
gender hierarchies. Several organisations have managed to operate successfully
as facilitators of poor women’s (and men’s) empowerment. My thesis aims to
provide an understanding of this process of empowerment from the perspective
of the women involved in GK.
W
The theoretical framework of my research draws on two bodies of literature:
recent feminist debates on empowerment and the gender and development
IE
discourse.
EV
12
gender needs and interests (Molyneux 1985, Moser 1993). Others have argued
for a link between the two through ‘transform atory potentials’ of NGO strategies
for empowerment (Kabeer 1994, 1995a, Young 1988, 1993). ‘Practical’ gender
needs concern, food, water, shelter, health, income and access to education,
training and credit. The policies therefore address the conditions of women’s
daily life. The corresponding policies of ‘strategic’ gender interests on the other
hand are directed at transforming the roles society ascribes to women and men.
They envision a future where inequalities between men and women no longer
exist. The feminist debates recognise cultural, ethnic, racial and class differences,
but argue th a t women can unite around certain issues they have in common,
such as the aim to change traditional gender roles and the unequal distribution
of resources between the genders, to overcome the sexual division of labour, the
alleviation of domestic burdens and child care and the fight against male violence
W
and control of sexuality. It was argued, however, th a t the distinction between
‘practical’ and ‘strategic’ gender needs and interests runs the risk of setting
‘strategic’ gender interests ‘aside as feminist concerns’ and becoming irrelevant
IE
to planners and development practitioners (Young 1993:155). The concept of
‘transform atory potential’ proposes a fusion between ‘practical’ and ‘strategic’
EV
gender needs and interests. The following NGO initiatives, for example, are
believed to be transformatory:
* providing new economic resources {e.g. non-traditional employment)
PR
Fem inist notions of empowerment are all directed towards collective action,
which is described as a ‘collective experience of struggle’ aimed a t ending
‘discriminatory practices’ (Young 1993:157) {e.g. protests against dowry and wife-
beating, fights for legal rights and equal pay). So far most of the feminist
empowerment discourse, however, has focused on theorising concepts of
empowerment for the ‘others’ (the victimised third world women), rath e r than
exploring how empowerment is practised and lived by these ‘others’.
13
been little prim ary research at the grassroots level to contribute to
our understanding of w hat empowerment means in everyday term s
(Carr et al. 1996:3).
I address this gap in the literature by presenting an analysis of empowerment
from the perspective of third world women’s day to day experiences of
empowerment. Aware of post-colonial critique of (mis)-representing and using
third world women as ‘native informants’ (Spivak 1988), I argue th a t an in-depth
insight into women’s own perspectives of change and empowerment is necessary
for any development intervention th a t claims to be gender-sensitive. ‘Situated
knowledge’ (Haraway 1991, Harding 1991, Rose 1997) of third world women’s
daily experiences and struggles is a necessary condition for facilitating
empowerment as it indicates which factors hinder or foster women’s
empowerment. Reaching this level of understanding becomes an increasingly
urgent m atter in the context of recent cooption of empowerment concepts by the
W
m ainstream development establishment. The redefinition of empowerment
strategies according to women’s needs and interests lays out the foundation for
IE
the feminist vision of mobilising poor women (and men) into collective action.
One should keep in mind, however, th a t ‘situated knowledge’ does not claim for
universal applicability. It remains limited, partial and uncertain. According to
EV
Rose (1997:319):
1.3 D evelopm ent, gender and em pow erm ent in B an glad esh
14
their agenda. The international political and economic climate of structural
adjustm ent and Bangladesh’s national efforts to follow an export-oriented
industrialisation strategy in the 1980s, however, was soon reflected in the
development arena. Consciousness-raising efforts were eventually replaced by
income-generation programmes.
W
scale entrepreneurs. As credit has become the dish of the day amongst donors it
is not surprising th a t there is hardly an NGO in Bangladesh th a t has not jum ped
on the bandwagon of credit provision for the poor by now. Also ‘gender’ has
IE
become a popular term in the development dictionary and has thus become an
imperative component in most NGO programmes. The dom inant understanding
EV
15
recollections of former village life in my search to understand w hether and how
they are adapting to their new work and living circumstances. W hat does
working and (for some) living in GK mean for the women? How does this new
working/living environment influence the way they think and behave? In w hat
activities do they engage daily? Whom do they meet a t GK? W hat do they talk
about with other people at GK? I am interested in understanding how women
feel in a place like GK and w hether the experiences they make there {e.g. doing
non-traditional work, interacting with strangers) and the place itself (enclosed
community) have an impact on their bodily transformation.
W
Recently the body has received increased attention in academic discourses^ as
well as popular interest. Most of the literature, however, reflects on how people
in the West perceive their bodies.
IE
In the affluent West, there is a tendency for the body to be seen as
an entity which is in the process of becoming; a project which
EV
16
new identities, however, they do not demonstrate these through fit, slim and sexy
bodies as in the West, but through a transformed way of talking, asserting
them selves towards others, moving, appearing and presenting themselves in
public spaces.
I draw on Giddens’s (1984), Goffman’s (1959, 1963)'^ and M auss’s (1973) concepts
of the body when exploring the transform ation of women’s bodies during their
experiences a t GK. In Goffman’s work, for example
W
(Kendon 1988). Rather than presenting the outcomes of interaction he was
interested in how it was done. I translate Goffman’s ‘interaction practices’ into
IE
th e embodied empowerment practices of women as my intention is to show how
empowerment is practised in women’s daily bodily performances.
EV
Even fem inist debates in South Asia have failed to incorporate an understanding
of women’s bodies th at goes beyond issues of production, reproduction and sexual
oppression (e.g. the m aternal body, the body as bearer of women’s double burden,
the victimised body). Recent work on women’s empowerment has begun to
17
challenge the notion of women as victims. However, when speaking of
empowerment and collective action, feminists seem to focus on the mind and
consciousness, ignoring the physical aspects of women’s empowerment process:
W
include an analysis of the body into the GAD discourse. The implication of this
m ust be to achieve a deeper understanding of how development intervention,
IE
directed towards women’s empowerment, affects women’s bodies and their
relation to their bodies and to use this as a basis for strategic gender-sensitive
development policy.
EV
In the following paragraphs I describe how the gaps I have identified in the
literature on women in Bangladesh have been addressed in my thesis structure.
C hapter Two presents a general overview of the GAD debate and draws out the
limitations of existing empowerment theories, one of the m ain limitations being
the lack of attention given to embodied aspects of women’s empowerment.
Chapter Three describes my research methodology. Here I explain the choice of
my case study organisation GK and the underlying rationale for selecting
fem inist ethnography as my core method for investigating the lived experiences
of women’s empowerment. In the conclusion of th a t chapter I reflect on my role
as a feminist researcher and illustrate how I dealt w ith issues of positioning,
representation and authenticity in the field.
18
Chapter Four serves as an introduction to the setting of my research: the case
study organisation GK. The chapter begins with a general overview of women’s
position in Bangladesh and the role NGOs play in term s of promoting women’s
empowerment. I then move on to discuss the history, philosophy and internal
structure of the organisation GK. Like most NGOs in Bangladesh GK is not
immune to internal power structures and hierarchies. I therefore discuss both
positive and negative aspects of GK’s approach to women’s empowerment. The
chapter ends with a general profile of the type of women who come to work at
GK.
How women experience the process of adaption to a new world and way of life
through their engagement with GK is analysed in my empirical chapters:
Chapters Five, Six and Seven. Both theoretical aspects of empowerment as well
W
as the women’s own perceptions of change influenced the way I structured my
empirical chapters into socio-economic (Chapter Five), socio-political (Chapter
Six) and embodied (Chapter Seven) dimensions of empowerment. Kabeer’s
IE
(1995a) concept o f‘transform atory potential’ of NGO strategies for empowerment
forms the theoretical framework of my structure in term s of how I understand
EV
Changes from the women’s perspective appear to have taken place in term s of
increased m aterial resources, a certain degree of economic independence and self-
respect (Chapter Five); the ability to ‘mix’ with other non-family related people
and a feeling of being ‘more intelligent’ than before (Chapter Six) and an increase
in confidence and assertiveness notable in their transform ed body language and
behaviour (Chapter Seven). In Chapters Five, Six and Seven I therefore provide
a holistic approach towards women’s empowerment process:
Chapter Five presents GK in its role as a work place which offers women ‘new
economic resources’ in the form of non-traditional training and employment
opportunities. In this chapter I describe the women’s reasons for engaging in
wage employment and how they adapt to this new experience. How women
19
negotiate their work at GK with their families forms p a rt of the analysis in the
next section. Here I also illustrate women’s increased sense of self-worth through
their work experience at GK. At the end of this chapter I point out the agency’s
lim itation in securing women non-traditional work elsewhere.
W
C hapter Seven underpins my reflections from the previous two chapters by
describing women’s embodied experiences of empowerment in the course of their
IE
involvement in GK, both in its role as an employer and as a gender-sensitive
organisation offering women their own dedicated spaces of ‘social interaction’
EV
(Goffman 1983a). On the one hand their engagement in ‘masculine’ work has
transform ed women’s attitude towards themselves, their behaviour towards
others and their bodily postures and performances. On the other hand women are
exposed to daily contact and interaction with others, with whom they have no kin
PR
20
needs to acknowledge the fact th at change is a contradictory process. I do this
by examining the limitations in women’s personal experiences of empowerment
when negotiating their multiple identities with their families and communities.
I then return to the theoretical discussion of empowerment by revealing some of
its ambiguities. The chapter ends with suggestions for future research.
N otes
1. The concept of empowerment is used, for example, in the Black movement in the US, in
political philosophy, adult education, economic development, community work, social work,
business management, leisure sciences.
2 .1 understand the term ‘third world’ as problematic and inadequate. Lacking an appropriate
alternative term I use it in this context for formerly colonised societies. See also Mohant^s
(1991) critique of Western feminists ‘production of the "Third World Woman" as a singular
monolithic subject’.
W
3. See, for example, Bordo (1993), Bourdieu (1978,1984,1986), Braidotti (1994), Butler (1990,
Connell (1983, 1987), 1993), Elias (1991), Featherstone et al. (1991), Foucault (1977, 1978,
1980,1982), Frank (1991), Fuss (1990), Grosz (1990a, 1990b, 1994), Jaggar and Bordo (1989),
Shilling (1993) and Turner (1984, 1991, 1992).
IE
4. The symbolic interactionist Erving Goffman views the body as component of action. For
more details on Goffman’s work on the socially constructed self, interaction orders and rituals
and the role of public spaces on human behaviour, see Goffman (1959, 1961, 1963, 1967,
EV
1969, 1971, 1981, 1983a, 1983b) and Drew and Wootton (1988), Giddens (1988), Kendon
(1988), Lemert and Branaman (1997) and Shilling (1993).
PR
21
Chapter Two: Rethinking empowerment
2.1 Introduction
W
stages of empowerment not only in cognitive, but also physical term s. In this
thesis I therefore set out to provide a clearer understanding of women’s ‘lived
experiences’ of empowerment by also giving attention to the embodied aspects of
IE
empowerment.
EV
22
solution was therefore women’s integration into economic development. In other
words women’s increased participation in economic and political life would result
in their liberation and sexual equality.
General critiques of the WID approach came mainly from three schools of
thought. They differed from traditional Marxism as well as from each other in
the way they interpreted sexual inequalities as an explanation of general
inequalities (Kabeer 1994). One form of critique came from the ‘dependency
feminists’.^ In their view capitalist development m arginalises third world women
by pushing them into peripheral productive roles. Integration into development
was perceived merely as a means of utilising women’s cheap labour for export-
or m arket-oriented production. Beneria and Sen (1981), for example, argue th a t
women’s economic m arginalisation is not a result of their exclusion from
W
productive labour, but from exploitation of their labour in the global system of
capitalist labour relations. Women are driven into participating in this unequal
system and into entering the labour m arket for survival. Instead of enabling poor
IE
th ird world women to gain control over land and self-sufficient production, this
process pushed them to produce for others in the national or international
EV
centres.
Unlike the dependency feminists the ‘German Fem inist School’ (Bennholdt-
PR
Thomsen 1981, Mies 1980, 1982, 1986, Mies et al. 1988) did not prioritise class
over gender inequalities. They insisted th at both men and the capitalist system
were benefiting from women’s oppression. The expansion of the two-class m arxist
analysis by Mies (1988a) describes a three-tier model of capital accumulation:
capitalists, wage workers (predominantly white men) and at the bottom non
wage workers (mainly women), housewives, and subsistence producers in the
colonies (men and women).^ Ju st as third world subsistence workers are
colonised by the industrial countries and multinationals, women are colonised by
men through the ‘housewifisation’ of their labour, where ‘housewifisation’
involves unpaid or low paid labour (Bennholdt-Thomsen 1988a, 1988b, von
W erlhof 1988a, 1988b). A woman’s income earned through integrationist income
generation projects is perceived merely as a supplement to th a t of her husband,
the ‘breadwinner’ of the family.
23