Module V
Module V
Research Ethics
Research ethics is like a set of rules that researchers follow to make sure their studies
are fair and safe. These rules include things like asking people for permission before
including them in a study, keeping their personal information private, and making sure
the research doesn't harm anyone. It's all about being honest, respectful, and
responsible when doing research.
Research ethics in research methodology refers to the ethical principles and guidelines
that govern the conduct of research involving human participants, animals, or the
environment. It involves ensuring that research is conducted responsibly, with
integrity, and with respect for the rights, welfare, and dignity of all involved. Key
aspects of research ethics include obtaining informed consent from participants,
protecting their privacy and confidentiality, minimizing potential risks of harm,
ensuring honesty and integrity in reporting findings, and adhering to relevant laws and
regulations. Researchers have a duty to conduct their work ethically and transparently,
with a commitment to upholding the highest standards of integrity and
professionalism. Ethical considerations are essential for safeguarding the well-being of
participants, maintaining public trust in research, and upholding the integrity of the
scientific community.
Scientific honesty: Do not commit scientific fraud, that is, do not fabricate,
fudge, trim, destroy or misrepresent data.
Carefulness: Researcher should strive to avoid careless errors or sloppiness in
all aspects of scientific work.
Intellectual freedom: Researcher should be allowed to pursue new ideas and
criticise old ones.
Openness: Scientific research should be open to share data, results, methods,
theories, equipment, and so on. A research work should always be open for
criticism.
The principle of credit: Avoid plagiarism. Whenever the works of other
scientists are used, given them due credit.
All researchers are liable to observe these principles without failure. Among these the
scientific honesty and the principle of credit are matters of ethics. A failure in
practising these principles can be considered the so-called scientific misconduct.
Ethical principles are to be followed for good practice of research. It is essential for
fostering the scientific integrity and for the preservation of privileged information.
The researcher and the research institution are responsible for exercising honest
research practices.
The researcher must respect the contributions of other researchers and follow
standards for authorship and cooperation.
The researcher is individually responsible for the activities, subject matter and
method of his or her research, as well as for the quality of the results.
When conducting research, the researcher must follow national and international
regulations on ethics and safety.
The researcher must clarify the degree of certainty and precision that
characterizes the research results.
The researcher must respect the demands for informed consent.
Research must secure the privacy of the research subjects.
Stem cell case: Dr. Hwang Woo-Suk, a researcher and professor at Seoul
National University, rose to fame after claiming a series of remarkable
breakthroughs in the field of stem cell research. In 2004 and 2005, Dr. Hwang
published two papers in the journal science that claimed his team had succeeded
in creating human embryonic stem cell through cloning. Allegations later
followed from a co-worker that this paper was based on fabricated data. The
papers were editorially retracted, Dr. Hwang lost his position at Seoul National
University, and the South Korean government stopped its financial and legal
support of his research.
The Baltimore Case: in the summer of 1995, Margaret O’Toole, a post
doctorate fellow at MIT, was asked by her supervisor Dr. Imanishi-Kari to do
experiments that would extend the work describe in a paper that has been
published in the journal cell. Unable to repeat aspects of the research
documented in this paper, O’Toole came across a laboratory notebook that
suggested to her that the cell study was wrong. Before too long, O’Toole came to
believe that the errors in the paper were deliberate. She then challenged the
authors of the paper, including the Nobel prize winner David Baltimore. A long
investigation followed, during which the National Institutes of health, and
members of congress become involved. During the investigation, Baltimore was
forced to resign as president of Rockefeller University, in part because of his
spirited defence of Dr. Imanish-Kari. Dr. Imanish-Kari was first found guilty of
19 counts of research misconduct, but was later cleared of all misconduct
charges in 1996 by a Human Health and Services appeals panel.
An understanding of the unethical practices will help the researcher to act
according to the values and principles of scientific research by placing their
positions into a logical framework. Unethical practices in research can be
identified in various forms. “Code of Practice for Dealing with Allegations of
scientific or Ethical Misconduct in Research”, Manchester Metropolitan
University listed the following activities as scientific misconduct.
Failure to obtain appropriate permission to conduct research.
Failure to access the research proposal using the Universal Ethics framework.
Plagiarism, or dishonest use of unacknowledged sources.
Inappropriate attribution of authorship.
Unauthorized use of information which was acquired confidentially.
Fabrication, falsification, or corruption of research data.
Publication of data known or believed to be false or misleading.
Fraud or other misuse of research funds or research equipment.
Deception in relation to research proposals.
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's words, ideas, or creations without proper
acknowledgment or attribution. It can occur in various forms, including copying text
verbatim from a source without quotation marks or citation, paraphrasing another
person's ideas without giving credit, or presenting someone else's work as your own.
Plagiarism is considered a serious ethical violation in research and academia because it
undermines the principles of intellectual honesty, integrity, and originality. It can have
significant consequences, including damage to one's reputation, academic penalties,
and legal repercussions. Researchers must always ensure they properly cite and
attribute sources to avoid plagiarism and uphold the standards of academic integrity.
Authors usually copy phrases or sentences from other authors but fail to cite
sources. This includes inaccurate and incomplete citing. The copying can be
major portion of text from a single sources, sentences or phrases from multiple
sources.
Sometimes the author cannot identify the course of the cited information with
an introductory or single phrase and therefore it is not possible to present
attribution.
Misrepresenting the true meaning of the original sources when paraphrasing is
also a kind of plagiarism.
Authors sometimes fail to use quotation marks around the phrase or sentence
copied from a source.
Use of words or sentences that are too closely matched with the original
documents is a kind of misuse in the paraphrase technique.
An author cannot avoid using ideas from other sources in scientific writing. Using
others idea is a kind of appreciation and recognition given to those authors. Very often
ideas can only be built based on the existing ideas. However, to avoid plagiarism ‘it is
important that the author should properly identify and give appropriate credit to the
outside sources through the proper use of quotation marks, internal citations, and
references ‘.
There are various reasons for committing plagiarism. It varies from accidental
mistakes to deliberate intention to present a result that actually was not obtained. Many
mistakes are related to referencing. One example is the forgotten footnote. Sometimes
the author mentions the original author’s name for a source but not include specific
information in the reference. Even if proper citation is given, authors may forget to
include the cited text in quotations marks. Theses are unintentional or by mistakes.
Some other reasons are:
Plagiarism should be avoided in scientific writing not only because it is unethical but
also it degrades the integrity of scientific research and dignity of the scientific
profession. The first step to avoid plagiarism is to understand characteristic of
scientific writing, ethical principles and various forms of plagiarism. The methods to
avoid plagiarism in scientific writing include:
This is rather the most serious scientific misconduct. This includes the misuse of
privileged information taken from the manuscript received form the editor of a journal
or from a funding agency for peer review, the information taken from the application
for a grant, etc. This is a serious matter since it is the real theft of intellectual property.
“It not only deprives the original author of appropriate credit by citation but could also
pre-empt priority of first publication or use of the original idea to which the source
author is entitled”. Peer reviewers should follow the ethical principles and should not
breach the confidentiality of the manuscripts. Any unpublished information may be so
precious for an author because when it published in a peer reviewed journal it may get
worldwide attention.
Misuse of Data
The integrity of research demands reporting of all relevant data. If a researcher fails to
report any data that contradict or fail to support the reported conclusions, it is
considered a breach of research integrity. Researcher should have good understanding
of different methods of data processing including graphical and tabular methods of
presentation, and error analysis. Special care should be taken in using photo-images as
the possibility of misinterpretation of underlying data is more. Misinterpretation of
data is usually known as falsification.
Authorship and publication issues in research methodology are critical aspects that
ensure proper recognition and integrity in the scientific community. Authorship entails
acknowledging the individuals who significantly contributed to the research process,
such as conceiving the study, conducting experiments, or analysing data. Determining
the order of authors is equally important, often reflecting the level of contribution,
with the first author typically being the one who made the most substantial
contributions. However, conflicts may arise over authorship order, requiring clear
communication and consensus among collaborators. Transparency regarding conflicts
of interest is vital to maintain credibility, as authors must disclose any affiliations or
financial interests that could potentially influence the research findings. Additionally,
adherence to publication ethics is essential to uphold the integrity of research
outcomes. This involves ensuring the originality of the work, accurately attributing
contributions, and avoiding data fabrication or manipulation. Overall, adherence to
ethical guidelines in authorship and publication practices is fundamental for
maintaining trust and integrity in scientific research.
Copyright is a set of rules that gives creators ownership over their work. It means that
if you make something original, like a story or a song, you have the right to decide
who can use it and how. For example, if you write a book, you can decide if others can
copy it, share it, or make changes to it. Copyright helps creators protect their ideas and
make sure they get credit for their work. If someone uses your work without
permission, it's called copyright infringement, and they could get in trouble. Overall,
copyright is about giving creators control over what they create.
To write a copyright notice, you typically include the © symbol, followed by the year
of publication, and the name of the copyright owner. For example:
This indicates that John Doe holds the copyright for the work published in 2024.
The use of copyright protects your original work from being used, copied, or
distributed without your permission. It gives you the legal right to control how your
work is used and allows you to take legal action against anyone who infringes on your
rights.
By obtaining copyright protection for your work, you have the exclusive right to
reproduce, distribute, display, and perform your work. You can also license or sell
these rights to others for commercial use.
Copyright law and information technology are closely intertwined in today's digital
world. Copyright law protects the rights of creators by giving them ownership over
their original works, like music, movies, books, and software. With the rise of the
internet and digital devices, it's become easier to create and share content worldwide.
However, this also means it's easier for people to copy and distribute works without
permission, leading to concerns about piracy.
To address these issues, technologies like digital rights management (DRM) are used
to control access to digital content and prevent unauthorized copying. Additionally,
licenses such as Creative Commons allow creators to specify how their works can be
used by others, promoting collaboration while respecting copyright.
Fair use is another important aspect of copyright law, allowing limited use of
copyrighted material without permission for purposes like education, research, or
commentary. However, determining what qualifies as fair use can be complex and
depends on various factors.
Enforcing copyright law in the digital age is challenging, especially across different
countries with varying laws and enforcement methods. International cooperation is
crucial to combat online piracy effectively and protect the rights of creators.
In summary, copyright law and information technology shape how content is created,
shared, and consumed online. It's essential to find a balance between protecting
creators' rights and promoting access to knowledge and creativity in the digital age.