MINOCHA-EuthanasiaSocialScience-2011
MINOCHA-EuthanasiaSocialScience-2011
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
can evaluate
Both the Terry Schiavo and Aruna Shanbaug the husband is in a coma, the woman is con-
his life situation objectively
cases discussed above highlighted sidered married and not denied the status,
the as the advocates of eutha-
and rationally
contentious issue of agency raising ques-
nasia prefer privileges and favours extended to mar-
it to be? Is it indeed possible
to makeof
tions on who constitutes a "family" decisions
the on one's life and death, ried women till the husband's last breath.
patient exercising the right toboth
let of
herwhich
live are emotionally charged
In such cases, the wife would never easily
issues, against
or die. One of the major arguments without the involvement of one'sopt for euthanasia for her husband.
own
euthanasia is precisely that "the and others' sentiments and emotions? Further, exercising the right to a digni-
philosophy
Should
and respectability can be mutilated andemotions
used be of lesser validity fied
as death could also be problematic in
to suit anyone but the subject compared situations of marginality based on ethni-
to strict medical and economic
in question"
(Duttagupta 2008: 254).6 grounds? Einarsdottir (2009) succinctly
city, class and gender. Duttagupta (2008)
In active euthanasia it is important to perplexed role of parents by
brings out the as offering two contrasting cases of deaths
ask - how much do we knowemotional
about experts of women in India and the us respectively
why in end-of-life decisions
patients seek euthanasia? While more
of pre-term raises precisely this issue to ask "how many
infants in Iceland. This aspect
research is needed on the social contexts
of emotion brings back the issue of agencyIndian women know when and where to
- who should
of end-of-life care and decisions, a fewtake the decisions for termi-
exercise their rights and dignity"? Consider-
studies in the uk do talk about nation
how offactors ing the gender bias faced by many Indian
life? While medical professionals
like loss of autonomy, and the and degree
bioethicists
ofuse emotional involvementwomen in their daily lives, can a right to a
dependency along with severityas an of
argument
irre- against the rights of par-dignified death be asserted? Discourses
ents to be involved in such end-of-life deci-
versible suffering have been significantly on death with dignity hence need to be
linked to demands for end of life
sions,decisions situated within processes of living with
parents strongly feel that the child
(Seale and Addington-Hall 1994, 1995a
belongs to them and they have the right dignity
to in everyday contexts.
and 1995b; Van den Block et decide the future
al 2009) and of their children (ibid).
Even when euthanasia is understood inConclusion
how conversely patients have accepted the
natural course of death despite This article makes an attempt to focus on
severeof the right of the patient
the framework
to illnesses
physical discomfort in terminal a dignified issues surrounding euthanasia from a
indeath, it is important to
understand
situations of strong family and physicianthat rights of persons do notsocial science perspective. While the social
support (Duttagupta 2008). exist in a vacuum, but are exercised sciences and more specifically sociology/
within
The desire for euthanasia isthe context of social roles - one's own and
associated anthropology have contributed extensively
thosedoes
with terminally ill patients but of others,
the which dovetail into eachon health, illness and suffering, contribu-
other.
patient always know that he/she is aThis also means that till the tion on issues around death is relatively
moment
terminal case? Who informs him or aher
of death, scarce. While euthanasia is being dis-
person, even if on his/her death
bed, is aaccept
of this? Does every such patient cussed of late more openly in countries
social being that carries meaning
this terminal status for him/herself? including India, it has largely remained
for others and is vested with social obliga-
tions
Zimmermann (2004) in a review of and privileges towards them. A few
hospice a medical and legal issue. This article
anthropological
and palliative care literature discusses theliteratures thus link the attempted to situate this in a social and
issueterminal
discourse on patients' denial of of end-of-life decisions and construc-
cultural context to ask what kind of ques-
illness and impending death. tions of life and death to the notion of
Patients' tions and issues are at stake. It sought to
denial in this literature has been looked
personhood argue that euthanasia needs to be situated
(Kaufman 2000; Einarsdottir
upon in a number of ways - as2009; Kaufman and Morgan 2005).
a conscious in related discourses on everyday life and
In many
or unconscious defence mechanism, cultures, such as India, inliving, personhood, constructions of death,
which
which
might be healthy and denial as the rituals and symbolic aspects of dying and
autonomous individual is slowly
a non-
emerging,
compliant behaviour as it obstructs ageing in cross-cultural contexts. Euthanasia
the processes of life and death
certain
kinds of care. In the latter,are carried
such out in social contexts in which
non- is deeply embedded in cultural traditions
compliance is linked to the discourses and it is important to study these to be
on social obligations, mutual
religion, morality,
support, which
dying particularly in western society effectively able to contribute to the current
etc, are the determining factors
in any
invites patients to participate in thedecision-making.
plan- debates about legalisation of euthanasia.
The well-being of
ning of death. Anecdotal evidence the larger units of family and kinship
from The discussion establishes that euthanasia
other contexts like India shows that even when seen in the framework of a right
might be at stake in the individual's living
or dying. Therefore, others may or may
patients do not expect to be told about their to dignified death becomes an emotive
terminal illness by the "good doctors". issue full of contradictions and irreconcil-
not endorse the person's decision to termi-
nate his life, even though he may be inable
Also, issues of life and death (in addition a ideological stances. The hierarchy of
to the doctors) are also assumed to be vegetative state of existence. To take anhuman and civil rights, the ranking of
managed by superior forces leaving roomexample, in Hindu society there is a hugesocial positions occupied by the patient and
for expectations of a miraculous cure. difference in the social and ritual status,
the significant others in his reference group,
rights and privileges of a married woman
Further, is the severely ill patient in an the degree of the individual's domination
appropriate mental state in which he/she as compared to a widow. Therefore, even and
if assertiveness in decision-making on