Scribd
Upload
10 views

Micro project Report format

Uploaded by

Usama Jamadar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views

Micro project Report format

Uploaded by

Usama Jamadar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

MAHARASHTRA STATE

BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION


Certificate

This is to certify that Mr. Muhammad Usama Yahya Jamadar Roll No. 3304, of
Fifth Semester of Diploma in Computer Engineering, of Institute ATS Sanjay
Bhokare Group of Institutes, Faculty of Polytechnic, Miraj. (Code: 1552) has
completed the Micro-Project work satisfactorily in course CLIENT-SIDE
SCRIPTING LANGUAGE (22519) for the academic year 2024 to 2025 as
prescribed in the curriculum.

Place: Miraj Enrollment No:2215520009

Date: …………… Exam. Seat No: ……………

Subject Teacher Head of the Department Principal

1
Annexure – III

Teacher Evaluation Sheet

Name of Student: Muhammad Usama Yahya Jamadar Enrollment No. 2215520009


Name of Programmer: Computer Engineering Semester: Fifth
Course Title: Client-Side Scripting Language Code: 22519

Title of the Micro-Project: Creating a Simple Calculator using HTML and CSS

(For Office Use Only)


Course Outcomes Achieved
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………….
Evaluation as per Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro Project
 (Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)
S. Characteristic Poor Average Good Excellent
No to be assessed ( Marks 1-3 ) ( Marks 4 - 5 ) ( Marks 6 - 8 ) ( Marks 9- 10 )
.
1 Relevance to the Relate to very Related to some Take care of at- Take care of more
course few LOs Los least one CO than one CO
 ..
2 Literature Not more than At-least 5 relevant At –least 7 About 10 relevant
Survey two sources sources, at least 2 relevant sources, sources, most
/information (primary and latest most latest latest
collection secondary), very
old reference

3 Completion of Completed less Completed 50 to Completed 60 to Completed more


the Target as than 50% 60% 80% than 80 %
per project
proposal
4 Analysis of Data Sample Size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
and small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
representation neither sample, enough sample, enough sufficient and
organized nor data generated but data generated appropriate sample
presented well not organized and which is organized size. Proper
not presented well. and presented well inferences drawn
No or poor but poor by organizing and
inferences drawn inferences drawn presenting data
through tables,
charts and graphs.

5 Quality of Incomplete Just Well Well


Prototype/Mode fabrication/asse assembled/fabricat assembled/fabricat assembled/fabricat

2
S. Characteristic Poor Average Good Excellent
No to be assessed ( Marks 1-3 ) ( Marks 4 - 5 ) ( Marks 6 - 8 ) ( Marks 9- 10 )
.
l mbly. ed and parts are ed with proper ed with proper
not functioning functioning parts. functioning parts.
well. Not in proper In proper shape, In proper shape,
shape, dimensions within tolerance within tolerance
beyond tolerance dimensions and dimensions and
limit. good good
Appearance/finish finish/appearance. finish/appearance.
is shabby. But no creativity Creativity in
in design and use design and use of
of material material

6 Report Very short, poor Nearly sufficient Detailed, correct Very detailed,
Preparation quality sketches, and correct details and clear correct, clear
Details about about methods, description of description of
methods, material, methods, methods,
material, precautions and materials, materials,
precaution and conclusion, but precautions and precautions and
conclusions clarity is not there Conclusions. conclusions.
omitted, some in presentation. Sufficient Graphic Enough tables,
details are wrong But not enough Description. charts and sketches
graphic
description.

7 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized,


information is information but information and includes major
not included, not well organized well organized but information ,well
information is and not presented not presented well presented
not well well
organized.
8 Any other
(depending upon
nature of project:
please write
indicators by
pen)
Defense Could not reply Replied to Replied properly Replied most of
9 to considerable considerable to considerable the questions
number of number of number of properly
question. questions but not question.
very properly

3
Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet

Process Assessment Product Assessment Total


Part A - Project Methodology Part B - Project individual Mark
Project (2 marks) Report/Working Model Presentation/Viva s
Proposal (2 marks) (4 marks) 10
(2 marks)

Note:
Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution for each group of students in first 3
columns as per rubrics & individual evaluation in 4TH column for each group of students as per rubrics based
on viva.

Comments/Suggestions about team work/leadership/inter-personal communication (if any)


………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………..

Any Other Comment:


……………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………

Name and designation of the Faculty Member…………………………………….

Signature………………………………………………………………………………

Date: ……………………

You might also like