Thesis
Thesis
nz/
Copyright Statement:
The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand).
The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the
Act and the following conditions of use:
Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private
study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person.
Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right
to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be
made to the author where appropriate.
You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the
thesis.
THE ANTIBACTERIAL PROPERTIES
OF HONEY
A thesis
submitted in partial fulfilment
of the requirements for the Degree
of
Master of Science in Biological Sciences
at the
University of Waikato
by
KATHRYN MARY RUSSELL
University of Waikato
1983
i
ABSTRACT
3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoic acid
M. Wt. 212
iii
.ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CONTENTS
ABSTRACT i
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER 2 : MATERIALS AND METHODS 18
a. Honey 18
b. Antibacterial as say 18
c. Buffers 20
d. Staining reagents 21
e. Artificial honey 23
f. Cata lase 23
g. H 2 o 2 determination 23
h. Ultrafiltration 25
i. Thin-layer chromatography 25
j. Ultra-violet analysis 26
k. Infra-red analysis 27
1. Nuclear magnetic resonance 27
m. Mass spec�rometry 27
3.6 Ultrafiltration
3.7 Summary 46
CHAPTER 4: SOLVENT EXTRACTION OF THE ANTIBACTERIAL
ACTIVITY FROM HONEY 47
4.1 Solvent extraction _ 47
4.2 E ffect of acid and alkali on
factor stability 48
4.3 E xtracts of inactive honeys 52
4.4 Thin-layer chromatography on
commercial plates 52
4.5 Further extraction 57
4.6 Summary 61
CHAPTER 5: ISOLATION OF THE NON-PEROXIDE
ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY 62
5.1 Preliminary preparative TLC 62
5.2 Locating the antibacterial
activity 74
5.3 Further separation with
Preparative TLC 82
5.4 Locating antibacterial
compounds after
secondary chromatography 88
5.5 Tertiary chromatography of
Section B 101
5.6 Assessment of recovery of
activity from primary TLC.. 103
5.7 Summary 105
CHAPTER 6: CHARACTERISATION OF ANTIBACTERIAL
COMPOUNDS 106
6.1 Ultra violet spectroscopy 107
6.2 Infra-red spectroscopy 107
6.3 Nuclear magnetic resonance 112
6 .4 Ma�s spectromet�y of fraction
3 d 115
6.5 Mass spectrometry of other
active fractions 119
6.6 Conclusions 121
CHAPTER 7: DISCUSSION 124
REFERENCES 141
1
CHAPTER ONE:
INTRODUCTION
American Bee Journal (vol. 122, no. 4, pg. 247) said that
doctors at several Israeli hospitals are now using it on
open wounds after surgery. An Israeli microbiologist
claims it prevents infection, speeds healing and that tests
show it contains components very similar to antibiotics
(no details of these substances were gi�en, however). It
was thought to work more quickly than many antibiotics
because of easy absorption into the blood stream. The
article also claimed it was good for such internal maladies
as ulcers by absorbing acids and lubricating the digestive
tract. Another reported use of honey on the public is by
an English physician (Blomfield, cited by Goulart, 1979)
who recommends it for both cleansing and healing. He was
using pure natural honey in an accident and emergency
department under dry dressings and claimed that it promotes
healing of ulcers and burns better than any other local
application. (Some of these properties may be partly due
to honey providing a good barrier).
In 1970 twelve patients with wound breakdown after (��()vn•CAL
surgery for carcinoma of the vulva were treated with hon�y,
and bacteriological wound sterility was attained in 3-6
days and within 8 weeks there was complete healing without
the need for any skin grafting. Bacteria cultured from
the wounds were killed in vitro by undiluted honey.
Other therapeutic uses of honey include: raising the
haemoglobin content in blood of anaemic childern, cardiac
therapy, treatment of stomach ulcers, speeding up alcohol
metabolism in drunks and use against sickness resulting
from radiation treat�ent (probably due to its high fructose
content), and treatment pf respiratory infections and
various digestive diseases.
7
Q
of sugars. In one report the osmotic pressure ��--12_e more4
than 2 ,000 milliosmols. During the ripehing stag� honey
increases in density, energy and stability due to water
�'---"---
I�
Gluconic acid
25 20 15 10 5
f + t ..
t + 0
+ + + + 1
+ + + 2
+ + 3
+ L
+ growth of S.aureus
no growth
10
Controb unexposed 4
3 min. sun, original density 3
5 min. sun, original density 2
3 min. sun, and filter*, orig. density 4
1 hr. lab. lights, original density 2
Resistant Honey
Control, unexposed 5
5 min. sun, original density 5
5 min. sun, pH 6.5, diluted 5
Mixture
Control,unexposed 4
5 min. sun, original density 1
5 min. sun, pH 6.5, diluted 5
0 < 3 .4
1 3.4 8.7
2 8.8 - 20.5
3 20.6 - 54.5
4 54.6 - 1 74
5 > 174
from honeydew (of pine aphids), buds and needles and all
possessed activity.
Gannet and Lav.le (1960) working with a multifloral
honey containing lavender found an alcohol extract more
active than an acetone extract. The acetone extract of
this honey was ·unaffected by light or by neutralising the
honey. Heat reduced the activity (although it was still
active after autoclaving at 120 ° C for 15 minutezj but
heating and neutralising together eliminated it. The
activity returned after reacidifying however. Lavie (1963)
also found he was able to obtain a cold ether extract of
a honey sample which contained antibacterial substances
volatile at 95 ° c (a fraction collected at a higher
°
temperature than 95 c was inactive). Gannet and Laivie
concluded that besides antibacterial activity which
originated from the bee (H 2 o produced by glucose oxidase)
2
honey contained another group of antibacterial substances
(rrom the forage plants)which were volatile, photolabile,
extractable by solvents and more heat stable than inhibine.
Owing to administrative reasons no further work on honey
was done in that laboratory and therefore no attempt was
made to isolate and characterise the non-peroxide anti-
bacterial compounds. Dustmann (1978) also reported the
existance of an antibacterial effect from honey other than
the enzyme activity or sugar content but claimed it was
only a minor portion.
Papers have been published in recent years which still
ignore the possibility of non-osmotic non-peroxide anti-
bacterial effects, (James et al, 1972). Research continues
in Europe and Russia but no comprehensive papers appear to
17
CHAPTER TWO:
a. Honey
Honey samples were obtained from various beekeepers by
Mr M. Reed, Apiary Advisory Officer, Ministry of Agriculture
and Fisheries, Hamilton. The age, origin and previous
treatment of eachfuney sample is given in Chapter 3.
The honey sample used for all experiments, other than
screening a range of samples for activity, was unextracted
manuka honey, 18 months old.
The honey was stored in air-tight plastic containers
at 4 ° C until required for use.
b. Antibacterial Assay
Antibacterial activity was tested using an agar well
diffusion technique.
Plates were prepared using a 24-48 hour bacterial
culture in nutrient broth (0.08 g in 10 ml distilled water).
The culture (10 ml) was added to 150 ml of sterile liquid
nutrient agar (3.45 g in 150 ml distilled water) at about
45 ° c. The plates were poured immediately in a Laminar
Flow Cabinet and stored at 4°c for a maximum of 4 weeks.
Holes, 8 mm in diameter, were cut in the agar and the
wells filled with test solution. The plates were
incubated at_37 ° C for 18 hours (Figure 1).
The relative extent of inhibition of growth was
measured with a ruler as the distance between the edge of
the well and the edge of the clearing. (The extent of
19
c. Buffers
Phosphate buffer (0.1 mol/1) was prepared by
dissolving 3.12 g of sodium dihydrogen phosphate in 200 ml
distilled water and adjusting to pH 7 with NaOH.
Citric acid buffer (0.1 mol/1) was prepared by
dissolving 5.2535 g citric acid in 250 ml distilled water.
21
d. Staining Reagents
Lactate dehydrogenase detection reagent contained
Ht mg NAD'; 6 mg nitroblue tetrazolium, 15 mg lithium
lactate and 0.3 mg phenazine methosulphate dissolved in
2 ml distilled water. This was made up immediately before
use, the agar plate flooded with .it and_re-incubated for a
further 30 minutes. Living bacteria are stained purple
and other areas remain clear.
/'
Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (Kirchner, 1978) is a
,- V
biological detection reagent. Innoculated nutrient agar
was mixed with 0.7 ml of a 5% solution of triphenyltetra
zolium chloride in 50% methanol per 50 ml of medium. This
was poured gently onto the surface of the d�veloped
;_,�cu ( ct,y
chromatogram and when cool, a .,,,s;..oa-i' of sterile agar was
poured on top of this. Prior to incubation the plate was
placed in the refrigerator (4 °C) for 1 hour in order to
allow any inhibitory activity to diffuse into the agar
from the silica.
p-Aminophenol (Dawson et aL, 1969), the staining
reagent for sugars, was prepared fresh with 0.5 g
p-aminophenol and 2 g H3Po in 50 ml 96% ethanol. This
4
was sprayed (with a Shandon spray unit) onto the commercially
prepared TLC plate which was then heated for 5 minutes at
105-110 ° C. This stains:
glucose --.lo dark brown
fructose � lemon yellow
sucrose and maltose --i' brownish yellow
raffinose � light brown
22
e. Arti£icial hdrtey
An artificial honey solution, containing only sugars
rC
was used to test the resistance of bacteria to the sugar
content of honey. The solution consisted of sugarsand
water in the average proportions Thomson (1936) found in
21 New Zealand honey samples (Table 5), i.e. 17.5 ml water,
36.2 g glucose, 40 g fructose and 2.8 g sucrose.
f. Catalase
Catal�se solution was made up fresh when used and
consisted of 0.0278 g catalase powder (from horse�adish ,�/
L
g. li2�2 determination
peroxidase
In the course of the peroxidase reaction the hydrogen
donor 2-dianisidine (DH2) is oxidised to give a brown-
Manuka Average
h. Ultrafiltration
Ultrafiltration of honey solution was attempted with
a Chemlab. Ultrafiltration Cell (Model C 50) with an
Amicon Diaflow UM-05 membrane (nominal retentivity 500
molecular weight). Pressure was applied with oxygen-free
nitrogen.
1. Thin-layer Chromatography
Commercial chromatograms used for preliminary work
were Eastman Chromagram Sheet 6060 with a plastic backing.
The silica contained a fluorescent indicator. Chromatogram
strips were developed in screw-top jars which had been
equilibrated with solvent for 1 hour beforehand.
Developed strips were allowed to air-dry in a fume
cupboard.
Preparative TLC plates were prepared using Merck
Kieselgel 60 PF 2.,-1+1"'360 (silica gel with a plaster of
. I
k; Infra-red spectroscopy
This was carried out using a Shimadzu IR-27G
recording infra-red spectrophotometer in the range
4000-400 nm.
Potassium bromide discs were mad� of each freeze-
dried isolated sample. The anhydrous KBr and sample
were finely ground together with a pestle and mortar and
a 1 3 mm disc formed under 154 x 10 3 kP pressure under
vacuum for 1 minute.
m. Mass spectrometry
This analysis of samples was carried out on a Varian
Mat CHS mass spectrophotometer, which assigned masses.
,It had an associated data system, a 90 ° magnetic sector
instrument and samples were run at 24 ev.
28
CHAPTER THREE:
by H o
2 2
standards and manuka honey.
2.020 13
1.010 7.3
0.510 5.3
0.250 3.5
0.130 4.5
0 .. 063 2.5
o. 032 0.5
HONEY
100 6.0
50 5.0
25 3.5
10 2.5
1 0.3
31
1.01 mol/1.
b. Elimination of Hydrogen Peroxide with Catalase
To find the concentration of catalase required to
remove the H2 o 2 produced by honey, a range was tested with
alone as a control.
It was found that the lowest concentration of catalase
used, 6,255 ;_igma units/ml (2.78 g/1), totally eliminated
the antibacterial activity of 1.01 mo�/1H2 o 2• This
acid pH of honey.
In order to test the osmotic effect alone, a solution
of sugars was mixed in similar proportions to the
constitution of honey (Thomson., 1936. Table 7). The
sugar solution contained:
17.5 ml water
36.2 g glucose
40.0 g fructose
2 .8 g sucrose
All organisms were tested with the following
solutions:
1.01 mol/1 H o 2 (control)
2
0.5 ml 1.01 mol/1 H 2 o 2 + 0.5 ml catalase (control)
- -
-s::
E
•rl
Cfl -
�·rl tu) E Q)
Cfl tu) (1) � rl
•rl rl rl E
E H cu � H
'°s
'° '°s::
� 0 0-i Q)
t
•rl 0 '"d 0-i'"d
rl s:: � Cfl s::
Cfl
.£1
H� •rl �
ror
0 +:> rl .1:: +:> rl
s:: s:: s::�
Q)�
:> � 0-i�
O H� s:: Q) C) s::
i-1 E-1 s:: Q) s <� Q)
ro.-=l ::3
C) Q) �
:> 0
0 � P-i � < <
••• uncalculated
TABLE ___§: Inhibition of growth of various bacteria x no inhibition
by manuka honey and sugar solutions / slight inhibition
...// inhibition> 1 mm
not tested
Sugar solution Honey solution Honey+ Catalase H202 H2 °
% (v/v) % (v/v) % (v/v) 2
catala.se
I'
Test Organism 1 00 50 25 10 1 100 50 25 10 1 100 50 25 10 1
Esche!:_ichia coli Kl2 A I.I ././ ././ .// X ././ J./ .;/ .I./ X
Escherichia coli CSH34 I./ Jj I./ X X ./ ./ ./ X X ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Staphylococcus aureus /.I //
... ... ... ... ... ... ...
X X X X X J./ ././ X .// ././ ././ X X v'./ X
Micrococcus luteus X X X X X X X X X X .
Bacill� circulans X X X X X X X X X X
'
\.,.)
�
35
not considered.
The results show that four of the organisms tested
were both resistant to the high osmolarity of honey and
sensitive to the non-peroxide fact�rs. T·hese were
Serratia marsescens, Esch�tichia coli Kl2 F -,
Streptococcus faecilis and Sta�hylocbccus aureus.
Serratia marsescens was discarded because inhibition of
growth by all concentrations of honey was only slight and
therefore difficult to see. Staphylococcus aureus was
chosen as the test organism for all antibacterial assays
because of its greater sensitivity to the non-peroxide
activity and its sensitivity to lower concentrations of ...,
1.01 mol/1 H 20 2
H2 0 2 11
H2 o 2 + catalase 0
Honey (pH 7) 2. 0
Horuey (pH 7) + catalase 2.0
�, inhibition of growth
x, no inhibition
(b) ./ X X X
Manuka (a) ./ ./ ,/ ./
(b) ./ ./ ./ ./
( C) ./ ./ ./ /
(d) ./ I ./ /
Thyme X X X X
Thistle ./ X X X
Astelia ./ X X X
Cabbage Tree X X X X
Clover ( a) X X X X
(b) X X X X
Rewarewa (a ) / X ../ X
(b) ./ X I
./ X
( C) ./ X sl. X
Towai (a ) X X X X
(b) ./ X X X
Various � ./ ./
41
45 j j ./ ../ ../
55 j ../ ./ ../ .I
65 .J J ./ ../ ../
75 ./ I ./ I I
85 ,/ ./ ./ ../ .J
95 I ../ ../ ./ I
1. 01 mol/1 H2 02 (control)
Unheated
0 .5 ml honey + 1.5 ml water
0.5 ml honey + 0.5 ml water + 1 ml catalase
0 .5 ml honey + 0 .,5 ml citric acid, pH 7 + 1 ml water
0.5 ml honey + 0.5 ml citric acid, pH 7 + l ml catalas e
Heated at 9 0° c for 3 0 mins
r,
v.)
,..,
ml honey + 1.5 ml water
0.5 ml· h·oifey + 0.5 ml water + 1 ml catalase
0.5 ml honey + 0 .5 ml citric acid, pH 7 + 1 ml water
0.5 ml honey + 0.5 ml citric acid, pH 7 + 1 ml catalase
Honey 4.5
Honey + catalase 6.0
CHAPTER FOUR:
(control)
H2 o2 + catalase 0
50
INHIBITION inhibition no no no
inhibition inhibition inhibi tion
Control
inhibition
no inhibition
52
Extract inhibition
Extract+ catalase inhibition
Extract - neutralised inhibition
Extract - neut. + catalase inhibition
H2 02 inhibition
H2 o 2 + catalase no inhibition
Solution Activity
(50% v/v) Heather Clover
H2 o 2 inhibition
H2 o2 + catalase no inhibition
etched lines
'I/
j
�solvent front
), �
.,
�
'
� ?;S
�
� �AREA OF CLEARING
,. y
�-
.. �_. ----�- .. --. -- -----.. -- �application
�
line
A
�
�AREA OF CLEARING
U'w
AA A
1' t t
5pl 7 fl lOpl
alcohol extract
applied
-solvent front
ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY
KEY TO FIGURES:
very dark
•
•
.. . . :. :. .. . very faint
x = no inhibition of growth
s1 = �1 mm inhibiti on
,/ = �1 mm inhibition
67
sulphuric molybdophosphoric
'silica edge/
purple
20 mm
lime
green
black-grey� back-
�groun<
with
dark
blue
spots
I
....:...
::.:
white
background
brown-yell w
brown
-@- --
@·. . ..·.·.
,"f-f•. - - _. _. - -
"' -if"
...,.. -1' -1'- � ,f"' '1'
75�1 75fl 75;,tl 75r1 75J-Al 75.)Al 75_µ 1 75 ,tt 1 7 5 "'i'
.,ul
sugar honey solvent sugar honey solvent sugar honey solvent
. .. .
:·. .
brown
. ..
.... .-
.... ..
.: ..
. . ·.
No bacterial
growth on plate
- agar too thin
·brow
.. .
... ·.·.·.·
brown
..
----------- -- --
'j 1' 1' 1' 1'- 1" /j
75)'{ 1 75µ1 75µ1 75pl 75pl 75�1 75}{ 1 75�1 75 _.,u l
sugar honey extract sugar honey extract sugar honey extract
front
., __ 30
.; 29
..I 28
sl 27
��������--'l__.26
X 25
X 24
X 23
X 22
black 21
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X 2
sl 1
X 0
sl 9
sl 8
X 7
X 6
X 5
X 4
X 3
>-------------- ·
--------- ,:-- 1
2
Key to Figure 9
Absorbance
Strong absorbance
78
�
. . ..
�- - ..
.././ 37�
..j,// 36
././ ./ 35
j// 34
// 33
/./ �?
y 11
X '3 0
./ 29
X 28
X 27
X 26
X 2 c;
V ? i.
X 23
V ??
21
: ::: : ::
/,
:
: ::::::::: ::::: : : ::: ::: : :::::::::::::::::::::::::?::::::/:::::
V
............................... � ... . ...
appl ication line
'3
� 2
------- - - ----� --- ._._.,_ � - ----- -� -- ---- ------
y 1
Sulphuric Acid
The general spray reagent used previously appeared to
stain purple only the solvent front i.e. kieselgel and
solvent impurities. The band� of activity just behind
this were not stained. An area half-way up the plate was
charred black and it was concluded that this was sugar.
Ferric Chloride
A section was sprayed with a saturated solution of
anhydrous ferric chloride in methanol. Kirchner (1978)
lists this spray for terpene phenols. Elliot et al�,(1969)
lists a similar reagent:- a saturated solution in anhydrous
diox�n or chloroform to stain most phenolics red-violet.
They also claim that phenols having two or more vicinal
hydroxy groups, or ortho (or peri) hydroxycarbonyl groups, �- {-cJ
give coloured chelates with ferric salts.
In this case however, none of the antibacterial bands
were stained.
Anisaldehyde-Sulphuric Acid
Concentrated H2 so 4 (1 ml) was added to 0.5 ml anis-
Con�lusions
Although staining the chromatogram with sulphuric acid
or anisaldehyde gave inconclusive results about the chemical
nature of the antibacterial activity, the ferric chloride
potassium ferricyanide spray indicated that it was probably
phenolic. The negative results obtain�d with vanillin or
ferric chloride stains tend to eliminate the possibility of
it being a terpene. The lack of detection with ferric
chloride also limits the possible structure somewhat, i.e.
it does not have two or more vicinal hydroxy groups.
5.3 Furth�r Separ�tion with Preparative TLC
On primary TLC of honey extract two antibacterial bands
appeared to migrate just behind the solvent front and were
visualised as dark absorbing bands under ultra-violet
illumination. Two lighter absorbing antibacterial bands
were immediately behind each one of these (Figure 9).
Further separation of the active fractions was necessary in
order to see if the lighter bands were different compounds
or tailings of the darker bands. Sharper separation of all
active bands was desirable before qualitative analysis, to
avoid overlap of fractions. Secondary development on a
chromatogram would also give an indication of how pure these
bands were.
A 400 mm preparative plate was loaded with the alcohol
extract of 40 ml of honey and developed in Solvent I. It
was air-dried for two days, the u.v. patterns recorded and
a 50 mm vertical strip was divided into th±rty 5 mm strips,
cross�wise. These were removed and assayed for anti
bacterial activity and the results are shown in Figure 10.
Under ultra-violet,illumination of 254 pm wavelength
83
(Brown
represents a
mixture of
purple and
----------- -------�---
green)
./'II"./ 28
././,/
Fraction 2� ././
X
X
X
X 21
X 20
X 19
X 18
X 16
X 15
X 1
13
X 12
X 8
y
X 6
X 5
X
application lin X
------ J, ____ ----------- -----�---2
X 1
X 10
X
with Solvent I.
87
front
-----. -------�
solvent
\�------- ---- --
0
Q
0
c::;:::;
0
0 c:,
CD
C>
0
0 0
I,)
Diameter of zone
--r
of inhibition
visible 254 nm 350 nm
solvent front t brown =
)
urple
----- __ _4..._ - '�il.ica e dge; +_g reen ____ -----------
1 8
. -;, X
-- - - - _x__l4.
----t- - - --
a blicati on lin
Pla.te 1 acttvity 3
Plate 1 activity - Solvent II �0.5
treated
Plate 2 in total - eluted in 0.5-1
Solvent I
Plate 2 - 4 major active bands, 1
eluted in Solvent I
95
control 5
toluene 5
chloroform 6
acetone �l
Solvent II 5
97
Control 6
Solvent II (with reagent 6
grade acetone)
Reagent grade acetone 6
Bulk acetone 1
99
visual 254 rnm 3 5 0 nJ!l
X 1
X 2
r------:-�-����-i-��-t----11
X
0.5 4
t---------t,....;-----:.:.......;.;..__;;;.;:.::....;_��.::.;.;;,:,;,�----------'A
�----t;;-����..;;;.___---+-------:---, 0.5
X
5
6
f
X 7
0.7 8
(
1------t����-:--r�����--.::...:._::.__..2_�
1.0 9 B
�����-:;-:--��-+--��-If
1.0 10
5 0.5 11
6 0.5 12
7 C
1.0 13
1'
Active Barid No
1 - top 5 mm of area C 0
(next to B)
2 - next 10 mm 0
3 - next 10 mm 0
4 - next 10 mm 0
5 - next 10 mm 0
6 - next 10 mm 0.15
7 - next 10 mm 0.3
8 - next 10 mm 0.3
9 - next 10 mm 0.5 - 1.0
0.7
:::. --·- -
- "l- - .....,;;:- ... . b 1.3
not assayed
L. 0. 3
3 ( C) 1.0
-----------� �rigin
CHAPTER SIX:
CHARACTERISATION OF ANTIBACTERIAL
COMPOUNDS
.,��
l
2
,: 3 a
,:
,:.
:
I:
\.
\:.\:
'\
\:
,:
\�
\\
"....---- ... ,
\�
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
''
\
\
''
······ ",.......
��····· .
'� ... ...... ····· ........... .... . .....
nm-
. ..... ..
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
''
'
l
\
3 b
\
\
3 C
\
\
\
3 d
\
\
\
\ :
\
\
\
\
\
\
..
\
\
.
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
-- ...'
\
\
\... _,,,_,,
\
nm
• :""': ..... -- ••••• '" ••••••• flll'I'..-... � --.
Figure 16
' \
110
''
\
I
J e
''\
--.-.-- 4
''
' \
.......... 5
\
I
'
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
--,,
\\
· ····· .. \
\
·· . . . . ... \
. .. ·····
\
\
nm ...... . .
•
\
'
\
\
''
I
\
' 6
\
\ 7
\
'
\
l
8
\
' 9
'·
\
\
\
\
\ \\
\ \
\ \
\ \
\
\ \
\ \\ . . ./"\
\ \
·t..)._ ./ '
\ \ / -.,: \
\ .... \.I' •••••• \
,,_ .........
', ·,.,....... . __ ..... ---..,.
'•,
............... · ·· . · .
........ ,, .-... ···· · ··· · '
. . ·-.......
·�·----�. ' , · ..= : -,..�. .
.... ,, ···r-P-1...-.:,·.:-:-::-:-":.�
·.-:-:":�:-:-
nm
200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Figure 17
111
Wavelength (nm)
Sam le no. Peak s Plateau x) Notes
1 243,289
2 256
.3 a 268
249
3 C 271
3 d 272.5
)
3 e 270
5 323 Possib1y three Jila-tB'aux-�
on further dilution
6 239,258,311
7 Possibly three plateaux
on further dilution
8 265
112
(x)
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1-1
1-1
\J.)
���--.--�r----.--�,�--.------,.----,,----,,----,,--�r----,-�����.---�r--�.-�-y----�..,---·�..-�.-----;-\100
1
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2400 2800 3200 3600 4000
(cm-1)
Figu��· 19: Proton n.m.r. spectrum of fraction 3 d
0...,
;I
'
" .s
,,,.
�
�
.. .t
\,) "'i
","' :-
-i ;t ,;
�
I--'
���� ��}II�� �V'�� I--'
.p-..
115
proton n.m.r 15
189
3 d m/e = 212
OCH
3
HO �-C�
O
. � "'-OCH3
OCH3
(I) (II)
CH30
HO -Q-c��CH
3
CH 0
3
(III) (IV)
(syringic acid methyl ester) (trimethoxy benzoic acid)
�o
C - C,, - OH
- --..OCH
3 0
CH o �
HO
3
CH 0
0COOH or, HO o:�OH
3 OCH
3
(3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxy (2,6-dimethoxy-4-hydroxy
benz oic acid) benzoic acid)
methylation
OH���������
diazometha,ne
(IV) (V)
C - OCH3
\\
0
120
CH3 0
CH
3
o-9)- COOH
CH 0 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoic acid
3
CH o
3
r
methyl 4-hydroxy -
HoO-coocH 3,5-dimethoxybenzoate
3
CH
3 (syringic acid methyl ester)
(molecular weight 212)
and,
CH 0
3
CHJ� COOCHJ methyl 3,4,5-trimethoxy
3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoic
acid
122
Sample J U.V. absorbancel I.R. absorbance spectrum I M.S. data Proposed structure
No. spectrum and name
A I
1 I Plateau at
289 nm
High peak at 1100 cm-1 '
relatively low peak at
1400 cm-1, few peaks
I Molecular weight 226,
fairly pure
CH3n
CH 0 · ,g CXXlCH3
3
- ... - - - _, - - - - •.. - - - � ·-
- below -
- - 800 -.
-1
- cm- - - - - - -+ - - - - - - - - .. .. - I•
CH30
methyl 3,4,5-trimethoxy
3 b Plateau at "Noisier" peak pattern Molecular weight 226, benzoate
250 nm than sample 1 - with some 212 (0-methyl syringic
probably due to presence acid methyl ester)
of some material of
212 m.wt.
B 3 a Peak or plateau Peaks at 1100 cm --.l and Molecular weight 212, CH3
3 d within range -1 fairly pure
�(Y'\
-0r 0H
CH 01�- l\)
��
\..,J
V
o
"j
124
CHAPTER SEVEN;
DISCUSSION
OOH + NaOH
2 o2
to measure H may also have produced overestimations of
REFERENCES