This document is scheduled to be published in the

Federal Register on 09/29/2020 and available online at

federalregister.gov/d/2020-21123, and on govinfo.gov

5001-06-P

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Parts 204, 212, 217, and 252

[Docket DARS-2020-0034]

RIN 0750-AJ81

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Assessing

Contractor Implementation of Cybersecurity Requirements (DFARS

Case 2019-D041)

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of

Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Interim rule.

SUMMARY: DoD is issuing an interim rule to amend the Defense

Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a

DoD Assessment Methodology and Cybersecurity Maturity Model

Certification framework in order to assess contractor

implementation of cybersecurity requirements and enhance the

protection of unclassified information within the DoD supply

chain.

DATES: Effective [Insert date 60 days after date of publication

in the FEDERAL REGISTER].

Comments on the interim rule should be submitted in writing to

the address shown below on or before [Insert date 60 days after

date of publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER], to be considered

in the formation of a final rule.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2019-D041,

using any of the following methods:

o Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Search for “DFARS Case 2019-D041”. Select “Comment Now” and

follow the instructions provided to submit a comment. Please

include “DFARS Case 2019-D041” on any attached documents.

o Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2019-D041

in the subject line of the message.

Comments received generally will be posted without change to

http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check

www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after

submission to verify posting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Heather Kitchens,

telephone 571-372–6104.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

The theft of intellectual property and sensitive information

from all U.S. industrial sectors due to malicious cyber activity

threatens economic security and national security. The Council of

Economic Advisors estimates that malicious cyber activity cost the

U.S. economy between $57 billion and $109 billion in 2016. Over
a ten-year period, that burden would equate to an estimated $570

billion to $1.09 trillion dollars in costs. As part of multiple

lines of effort focused on the security and resiliency of the

Defense Industrial Base (DIB) sector, the Department is working

with industry to enhance the protection of unclassified

information within the supply chain. Toward this end, DoD has

developed the following assessment methodology and framework to

assess contractor implementation of cybersecurity requirements,

both of which are being implemented by this rule: the National

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication

(SP) 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology and the Cybersecurity

Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Framework. The NIST SP 800-

171 DoD Assessment and CMMC assessments will not duplicate efforts

from each assessment, or any other DoD assessment, except for rare

circumstances when a re-assessment may be necessary, such as, but

not limited to, when cybersecurity risks, threats, or awareness

have changed, requiring a re-assessment to ensure current

compliance.

A. NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology.

DFARS clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense

Information and Cyber Incident Reporting, is included in all

solicitations and contracts, including those using Federal

Acquisition Regulation (FAR) part 12 commercial item procedures,

except for acquisitions solely for commercially available off-

the-shelf (COTS) items. The clause requires contractors to

apply the security requirements of NIST SP 800-171 to “covered

contractor information systems,” as defined in the clause, that

are not part of an IT service or system operated on behalf of

the Government. The NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology

provides for the assessment of a contractor’s implementation of

NIST SP 800-171 security requirements, as required by DFARS

clause 252.204-7012. More information on the NIST SP 800-171

DoD Assessment Methodology is available at

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/cyber/strategically_assessing_c

ontractor_implementation_of_NIST_SP_800-171.html.

The Assessment uses a standard scoring methodology, which

reflects the net effect of NIST SP 800-171 security requirements

not yet implemented by a contractor, and three assessment levels

(Basic, Medium, and High), which reflect the depth of the

assessment performed and the associated level of confidence in

the score resulting from the assessment. A Basic Assessment is

a self-assessment completed by the contractor, while Medium or

High Assessments are completed by the Government. The

Assessments are completed for each covered contractor

information system that is relevant to the offer, contract, task

order, or delivery order.

The results of Assessments are documented in the Supplier

Performance Risk System (SPRS) at https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/

to provide DoD Components with visibility into the scores of

Assessments already completed; and verify that an offeror has a

current (i.e., not more than three years old, unless a lesser

time is specified in the solicitation) Assessment, at any level,

on record prior to contract award.

B. Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Framework.

Building upon the NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology,

the CMMC framework adds a comprehensive and scalable

certification element to verify the implementation of processes

and practices associated with the achievement of a cybersecurity

maturity level. CMMC is designed to provide increased assurance

to the Department that a DIB contractor can adequately protect

sensitive unclassified information such as Federal Contract

Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

at a level commensurate with the risk, accounting for

information flow down to its subcontractors in a multi-tier

supply chain. A DIB contractor can achieve a specific CMMC

level for its entire enterprise network or particular segment(s)

or enclave(s), depending upon where the information to be

protected is processed, stored, or transmitted.

The CMMC model consists of maturity processes and

cybersecurity best practices from multiple cybersecurity

standards, frameworks, and other references, as well as inputs

from the broader community. The CMMC levels and the associated
sets of processes and practices are cumulative. The CMMC model

encompasses the basic safeguarding requirements for FCI

specified in FAR clause 52.204-21, Basic Safeguarding of Covered

Contractor Information Systems, and the security requirements

for CUI specified in NIST SP 800-171 per DFARS clause 252.204-

7012. Furthermore, the CMMC model includes an additional five

processes and 61 practices across Levels 2-5 that demonstrate a

progression of cybersecurity maturity.

Level Description

1 Consists of the 15 basic safeguarding requirements

from FAR clause 52.204-21.

2 Consists of 65 security requirements from NIST SP 800-

171 implemented via DFARS clause 252.204-7012, 7 CMMC

practices, and 2 CMMC processes. Intended as an

optional intermediary step for contractors as part of

their progression to Level 3.

3 Consists of all 110 security requirements from NIST SP

800-171, 20 CMMC practices, and 3 CMMC processes.

4 Consists of all 110 security requirements from NIST SP

800-171, 46 CMMC practices, and 4 CMMC processes.

5 Consists of all 110 security requirements from NIST SP

800-171, 61 CMMC practices, and 5 CMMC processes.

 In order to achieve a specific CMMC level, a DIB company must

demonstrate both process institutionalization or maturity and

the implementation of practices commensurate with that level.

CMMC assessments will be conducted by accredited CMMC Third

Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs). Upon completion of a

CMMC assessment, a company is awarded a certification by an

independent CMMC Accreditation Body (AB) at the appropriate CMMC

level (as described in the CMMC model). The certification level

is documented in SPRS to enable the verification of an offeror’s

certification level and currency (i.e. not more than three years

old) prior to contract award. Additional information on CMMC

and a copy of the CMMC model can be found at

https://www.acq.osd.mil/cmmc/index.html.

DoD is implementing a phased rollout of CMMC. Until September

30, 2025, the clause at 252.204-7021, Cybersecurity Maturity

Model Certification Requirements, is prescribed for use in

solicitations and contracts, including solicitations and

contracts using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of

commercial items, excluding acquisitions exclusively for COTS

items, if the requirement document or statement of work requires

a contractor to have a specific CMMC level. In order to

implement the phased rollout of CMMC, inclusion of a CMMC

requirement in a solicitation during this time period must be

approved by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for

Acquisition and Sustainment.

CMMC will apply to all DoD solicitations and contracts,

including those for the acquisition of commercial items (except

those exclusively COTS items) valued at greater than the micro-

purchase threshold, starting on or after October 1, 2025.

Contracting officers will not make award, or exercise an option

on a contract, if the offeror or contractor does not have

current (i.e. not older than three years) certification for the

required CMMC level. Furthermore, CMMC certification

requirements are required to be flowed down to subcontractors at

all tiers, based on the sensitivity of the unclassified

information flowed down to each subcontractor.

II. Discussion and Analysis

A. NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology

This rule amends DFARS subpart 204.73, Safeguarding Covered

Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting, to implement

the NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology. The new

coverage in the subpart directs contracting officers to verify

in SPRS that an offeror has a current NIST SP 800-171 DoD

Assessment on record, prior to contract award, if the offeror is

required to implement NIST SP 800-171 pursuant to DFARS clause

252.204-7012. The contracting officer is also directed to

include a new DFARS provision 252.204-7019, Notice of NIST SP

800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements, and a new DFARS clause

252.204-7020, NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements, in

solicitations and contracts including solicitations using FAR

part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial items,

except for solicitations solely for the acquisition of COTS

items.

The new DFARS provision 252.204-7019 advises offerors required

to implement the NIST SP 800-171 standards of the requirement to

have a current (not older than three years) NIST SP 800-171 DoD

Assessment on record in order to be considered for award. The

provision requires offerors to ensure the results of any

applicable current Assessments are posted in SPRS and provides

offerors with additional information on conducting and

submitting an Assessment when a current one is not posted in

SPRS.

The new DFARS clause 252.204-7020 requires a contractor to

provide the Government with access to its facilities, systems,

and personnel when it is necessary for DoD to conduct or renew a

higher-level Assessment. The clause also requires the

contractor to ensure that applicable subcontractors also have

the results of a current Assessment posted in SPRS prior to

awarding a subcontract or other contractual instruments. The

clause also provides additional information on how a

subcontractor can conduct and submit an Assessment when one is

not posted in SPRS, and requires the contractor to include the

requirements of the clause in all applicable subcontracts or

other contractual instruments.

B. Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification

This rule adds a new DFARS subpart, Subpart 204.75,

Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC), to specify

the policy and procedures for awarding a contract, or exercising

an option on a contract, that includes the requirement for a

CMMC certification. Specifically, this subpart directs

contracting officers to verify in SPRS that the apparently

successful offeror’s or contractor’s CMMC certification is

current and meets the required level prior to making the award.

A new DFARS clause 252.204-7021, Cybersecurity Maturity Model

Certification Requirements, is prescribed for use in all

solicitations and contracts or task orders or delivery orders,

excluding those exclusively for the acquisition of COTS items.

This DFARS clause requires a contractor to: maintain the

requisite CMMC level for the duration of the contract; ensure

that its subcontractors also have the appropriate CMMC level

prior to awarding a subcontract or other contractual

instruments; and include the requirements of the clause in all

subcontracts or other contractual instruments.

The Department took into consideration the timing of the

requirement to achieve a CMMC level certification in the

development of this rule, weighing the benefits and risks

associated with requiring CMMC level certification: (1) at time

of proposal or offer submission; (2) at time of award; or (3)

after contract award. The Department ultimately adopted

alternative 2 to require certification at the time of award.

The drawback of alternative 1 (at time of proposal or offer

submission) is the increased risk for contractors since they may

not have sufficient time to achieve the required CMMC

certification after the release of the Request for Information

(RFI). The drawback of alternative 3 (after contract award) is

the increased risk to the Department with respect to the

schedule and uncertainty with respect to the case where the

contractor is unable to achieve the required CMMC level in a

reasonable amount of time given their current cybersecurity

posture. This potential delay would apply to the entire supply

chain and prevent the appropriate flow of CUI and FCI. The

Department seeks public comment on the timing of contract award,

to include the effect of requiring certification at time of

award on small businesses.

C. Conforming Changes

This rule also amends the following DFARS sections to make

conforming changes:

 Amends the list in DFARS section 212.301 of solicitation

provisions and contract clauses that are applicable for the

acquisition of commercial items to include the provisions and

clauses included in this rule.

 Amends DFARS 217.207, Exercise of Options, to advise

contracting officers that an option may only be exercised after

verifying the contractor’s CMMC level, when CMMC is required in

the contract.

III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified

Acquisition Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including

Commercially Available Off-the-Shelf Items

This rule creates the following new solicitation provision and

contract clauses:

 DFARS 252.204-7019, Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD

Assessment Requirements;

 DFARS clause 252.204-7020, NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment

Requirements; and

 DFARS clause 252.204-7021, Cybersecurity Maturity Model

Certification Requirements.

The objective of this rule is provide the Department with: (1)

the ability to assess contractor implementation of NIST SP 800-

171 security requirements, as required by DFARS clause 252.204-

7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber

Incident Reporting; and (2) assurances that DIB contractors can

adequately protect sensitive unclassified information at a level

commensurate with the risk, accounting for information flowed

down to subcontractors in a multi-tier supply chain. Flowdown

of the requirements is necessary to respond to threats that

reach even the lowest tiers in the supply chain. Therefore, to

achieve the desired policy outcome, DoD intends to apply the new

provision and clauses to contracts and subcontracts for the

acquisition of commercial items and to acquisitions valued at or

below the simplified acquisition threshold, but greater than the

micro-purchase threshold. The provision and clauses will not be

applicable to contracts or subcontracts exclusively for the

acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf items.

IV. Expected Cost Impact and Benefits

A. Benefits

The theft of intellectual property and sensitive information

from all U.S. industrial sectors due to malicious cyber activity

threatens U.S. economic and national security. The aggregate

loss of intellectual property and certain unclassified

information from the DoD supply chain can undercut U.S.

technical advantages and innovation, as well as significantly

increase risk to national security. This rule is expected to

enhance the protection of FCI and CUI within the DIB sector.

B. Costs

A Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) that includes a detailed

discussion and explanation about the assumptions and methodology

used to estimate the cost of this regulatory action is available

at www.regulations.gov (search for “DFARS Case 2019-D041” click

“Open Docket,” and view “Supporting Documents”). The total

estimated public and Government costs (in millions) associated

with this rule, calculated in perpetuity in 2016 dollars at a 7

percent discount rate, is provided as follows:

TOTAL COST (in millions) Public Govt Total

Annualized Costs $6,500.5 $0.3 $6,500.7

Present Value Costs $92,863.6 $3.7 $92,867.3

The following is a breakdown of the public and Government

costs and savings associated with each component of the rule:

1. NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessments

The following is a summary of the estimated public and

Government costs (in millions) associated with the NIST SP DoD

Assessments, calculated in perpetuity in 2016 dollars at a 7

percent discount rate:

DoD Assessments Public Government Total

Annualized Costs $6.7 $9.5 $16.3

Present Value Costs $96.1 $136.2 $232.3

2. CMMC Requirements

The following is a summary of the estimated public and

Government costs (in millions) associated with the CMMC

requirements, calculated in perpetuity in 2016 dollars at a 7

percent discount rate:

CMMC Requirements Public Government Total

Annualized Costs $6,525.0 $8.9 $6,533.9

Present Value Costs $93,213.6 $127.3 $93,340.9

3. Elimination of Duplicate Assessments

The following is a summary of the estimated public and

Government savings (in millions) associated with the elimination

of duplicate assessments, calculated in perpetuity in 2016

dollars at a 7 percent discount rate:

Eliminate Duplication Public Government Total

Annualized Savings -$31.2 -$18.2 -$49.4

Present Value Savings -$446.1 -$259.8 -$705.9

V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to

assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory

alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select

regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including

potential economic, environmental, public health and safety

effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563

emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and

benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of

promoting flexibility. This is an economically significant

regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to review under

section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,

dated September 30, 1993. This rule is a major rule under 5

U.S.C. 804.

VI. Executive Order 13771

The rule is not subject to the requirements if E.O. 13771,

because this rule is being issued with respect to a national

security function of the United States.

VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act

DoD expects this rule to have a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the

Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. Therefore, an

initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been performed and

is summarized as follows:

A. Reasons for the action

This rule is necessary to address threats to the U.S. economy

and national security from ongoing malicious cyber activities,

which includes the theft of hundreds of billions of dollars of

U.S. intellectual property. Currently, the FAR and DFARS

prescribe contract clauses intended to protect FCI and CUI

within the DoD supply chain. Specifically, the clause at FAR

52.204–21, Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information

Systems, is prescribed at FAR 4.1903 for use in Government

solicitations and contracts and requires contractors and

subcontractors to apply basic safeguarding requirements when

processing, storing, or transmitting FCI in or from covered

contractor information systems. The clause focuses on ensuring

a basic level of cybersecurity hygiene and is reflective of

actions that a prudent business person would employ.

In addition, DFARS clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered

Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting, requires

defense contractors and subcontractors to provide “adequate

security” to store, process, or transmit CUI on information

systems or networks, and to report cyber incidents that affect

these systems or networks. The clause states that to provide

adequate security, the Contractor shall implement, at a minimum,

the security requirements in “National Institute of Standards

and Technology (NIST) Special Publication (SP) 800-171,

Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in

Nonfederal Systems and Organizations.” Contractors are also

required to flow down DFARS Clause 252.204-7012 to all

subcontracts, which involve CUI.

However, neither the FAR clause, nor the DFARS clause, provide

for DoD verification of a contractor’s implementation of basic

safeguarding requirements or the security requirements specified

in NIST SP 800-171 prior to contract award.

Under DFARS clause 252.204-7012, DIB companies self-attest that

they will implement the requirements in NIST SP 800-171 upon

submission of their offer. A contractor can document

implementation of the security requirements in NIST SP 800-171

by having a system security plan in place to describe how the

security requirements are implemented, in addition to associated

plans of action to describe how and when any unimplemented

security requirements will be met. As a result, the current

regulation enables contractors and subcontractors to process,

store, or transmit CUI without having implemented all of the 110

security requirements and without establishing enforceable

timelines for addressing shortfalls and gaps.

Findings from DoD Inspector General report (DODIG-2019-105

“Audit of Protection of DoD Controlled Unclassified Information

on Contractor-Owned Networks and Systems”) indicate that DoD

contractors did not consistently implement mandated system

security requirements for safeguarding CUI and recommended that

DoD take steps to assess a contractor’s ability to protect this

information. The report emphasizes that malicious actors can

exploit the vulnerabilities of contractors’ networks and systems

and exfiltrate information related to some of the Nation’s most

valuable advanced defense technologies.

Although DoD contractors must include DFARS clause 252.204-

7012 in subcontracts for which subcontract performance will

involve covered defense information (DoD CUI), this does not

provide the Department with sufficient insights with respect to

the cybersecurity posture of DIB companies throughout the multi-

tier supply chain for any given program or technology

development effort.

Furthermore, given the size and scale of the DIB sector, the

Department cannot scale its organic cybersecurity assessment

capability to conduct on-site assessments of approximately

220,000 DoD contractors every three years. As a result, the

Department’s organic assessment capability is best suited for

conducting targeted assessments for a subset of DoD contractors.

Finally, the current security requirements specified in NIST

SP 800-171 per DFARS clause 252.204-7012, do not sufficiently

address additional threats to include Advanced Persistent

Threats (APTs).

Because of these issues and shortcomings and the associated

risks to national security, the Department determined that the

status quo was not acceptable and developed a two-pronged

approach to assess and verify the DIB’s ability to protect the

FCI and CUI on its information systems or networks, which is

being implemented by this rule:

 The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

Special Publication (SP) 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology. A

standard methodology to assess contractor implementation of the

cybersecurity requirements in NIST SP 800-171, “Protecting

Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) In Nonfederal Systems

and Organizations.”

 The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC)

Framework. A DoD certification process that measures a

company’s institutionalization of processes and implementation

of cybersecurity practices.

B. Objectives of, and legal basis for, the rule

This rule establishes a requirement for contractors to have a

current NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment and the appropriate CMMC

level certification prior to contract award and during contract

performance. The objective of the rule is to provide the

Department with: (1) the ability to assess at a corporate-level

a contractor’s implementation of NIST SP 800-171 security

requirements, as required by DFARS clause 252.204-7012,

Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident

Reporting; and (2) assurances that a DIB contractor can

adequately protect sensitive unclassified information at a level

commensurate with the risk, accounting for information flow down

to its subcontractors in a multi-tier supply chain.

1. NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology

In February 2019, the Under Secretary of Defense for

Acquisition and Sustainment directed the Defense Contract

Management Agency (DCMA) to develop a standard methodology to

assess contractor implementation of the cybersecurity

requirements in NIST SP 800-171 at the corporate or entity

level. The DCMA Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity

Assessment Center’s NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology

is the Department’s initial strategic DoD/corporate-wide

assessment of contractor implementation of the mandatory

cybersecurity requirements established in the contracting

regulations. Results of a NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment

reflect the net effect of NIST SP 800-171 security requirements

not yet implemented by a contractor, and may be conducted at one

of three assessment levels. The DoD Assessment Methodology

provides the following benefits:

 Enables Strategic Assessments at the Entity-level. The

NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology enables DoD to

strategically assess a contractor’s implementation of NIST SP

800-171 on existing contracts that include DFARS clause 252.204-

7012, and to provide an objective assessment of a contractor’s

NIST SP 800-171 implementation status.

 Reduces Duplicative or Repetitive Assessments of our

Industry Partners. Assessment results will be posted in the

Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS), DoD's authoritative

source for supplier and product performance information. This

will provide DoD Components with visibility to summary level

scores, rather than addressing implementation of NIST SP 800-171

on a contract-by-contract approach. Conducting such assessments

at a corporate- or entity-level, significantly reduces the need

to conduct assessments at the program or contract level, thereby

reducing the cost to both DoD and industry.

 Provides a Standard Methodology for Contractors to Self-

assess Their Implementation of NIST SP 800-171. The Basic

Assessment provides a consistent means for contractors to review

their system security plans prior to and in preparation for

either a DoD or CMMC assessment.

The NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology provides a

means for the Department to assess contractor implementation of

these requirements as the Department transitions to full

implementation of the CMMC, and a means for companies to self-

assess their implementation of the NIST SP 800-171 requirements

prior to either a DoD or CMMC assessment.

2. The CMMC Framework

Section 1648 of the National Defense Authorization Act for

Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 (Pub. L. 116-92) directs the Secretary of

Defense to develop a risk-based cybersecurity framework for the

DIB sector, such as CMMC, as the basis for a mandatory DoD

standard. Building upon the NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment

Methodology, the CMMC framework adds a comprehensive and

scalable certification element to verify the implementation of

processes and practices associated with the achievement of a

cybersecurity maturity level. CMMC is designed to provide

increased assurance to the Department that a DIB contractor can

adequately protect sensitive unclassified information (i.e. FCI

and CUI) at a level commensurate with the risk, accounting for

information flow down to its subcontractors in a multi-tier

supply chain. Implementation of the CMMC Framework is intended

to solve the following policy problems:

 Verification of a contractor’s cybersecurity posture.

DFARS clause 252.204-7012 does not provide for the DoD

verification of a DIB contractor’s implementation of the

security requirements specified in NIST SP 800-171 prior to

contract award. DIB companies self-attest that they will

implement the requirements in NIST SP 800-171 upon submission of

their offer. Findings from DoD Inspector General report (DODIG-

2019-105 “Audit of Protection of DoD Controlled Unclassified

Information on Contractor-Owned Networks and Systems”) indicate

that DoD contractors did not consistently implement mandated

system security requirements for safeguarding CUI and

recommended that DoD take steps to assess a contractor’s ability

to protect this information. CMMC adds the element of

verification of a DIB contractor’s cybersecurity posture through

the use of accredited C3PAOs. The company must achieve the CMMC

level certification required as a condition of contract award.

  Comprehensive implementation of cybersecurity

requirements. Under DFARS clause 252.204-7012, a contractor can

document implementation of the security requirements in NIST SP

800-171 by having a system security plan in place to describe

how the security requirements are implemented, in addition to

associated plans of action to describe how and when any

unimplemented security requirements will be met. The CMMC

framework does not allow a DoD contractor or subcontractor to

achieve compliance status through the use of plans of action.

In general, CMMC takes a risk-based approach to addressing cyber

threats. Based on the type and sensitivity of the information

to be protected, a DIB company must achieve the appropriate CMMC

level and demonstrate implementation of the requisite set of

processes and practices. Although the security requirements in

NIST SP 800-171 addresses a range of threats, additional

requirements are needed to further reduce the risk of Advanced

Persistent Threats (APTs). An APT is an adversary that

possesses sophisticated levels of expertise and significant

resources, which allow it to create opportunities to achieve its

objectives by using multiple attack vectors (e.g. cyber,

physical, and deception). The CMMC model includes additional

processes and practices in Levels 4 and 5 that are focused on

further reducing the risk of APT threats. The CMMC

implementation will provide the Department with an ability to

illuminate the supply chain, for the first time, at scale across

the entire DIB sector. The CMMC framework requires contractors

to flow down the appropriate CMMC certification requirement to

subcontractors throughout the entire supply chain. DIB

companies that do not process, store, or transmit CUI, must

obtain a CMMC level 1 certification. DIB companies that

process, store, or transmit CUI must achieve a CMMC level 3 or

higher, depending on the sensitivity of the information

associated with a program or technology being developed.

 Scale and Depth. DoD contractors must include DFARS

clause 252.204-7012 in subcontracts for which subcontract

performance will involve covered defense information (DoD CUI),

but this does not provide the Department with sufficient

insights with respect to the cybersecurity posture of DIB

companies throughout the multi-tier supply chain for any given

program or technology development effort. Given the size and

scale of the DIB sector, the Department cannot scale its organic

cybersecurity assessment capability to conduct on-site

assessments of approximately 220,000 DoD contractors every three

years. As a result, the Department’s organic assessment

capability is best suited for conducting targeted assessments

for a subset of DoD contractors that support prioritized

programs and/or technology development efforts. CMMC addresses

the challenges of the Department scaling its organic assessment

capability by partnering with an independent, non-profit CMMC-AB

that will accredit and oversee multiple third party assessment

organizations (C3PAOs) which in turn, will conduct on-site

assessments of DoD contractors throughout the multi-tier supply

chain. DIB companies will be able to directly schedule

assessments with an accredited C3PAO for a specific CMMC level.

The cost of these CMMC assessments will be driven by multiple

factors including market forces, the size and complexity of the

network or enclaves under assessment, and the CMMC level.

 Reduces Duplicate or Repetitive Assessments of our

Industry Partners. Assessment results will be posted in the

Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS), DoD's authoritative

source for supplier and product performance information. This

will provide DoD Components with visibility to CMMC

certifications for DIB contractor networks and an alternative to

addressing implementation of NIST SP 800-171 on a contract-by-

contract approach—significantly reducing the need to conduct

assessments at the program level, thereby reducing the cost to

both DoD and industry.

C. Description of and estimate of the number of small entities

to which the rule will apply

This rule will impact all small businesses that do business

with Department of Defense, except those competing on contracts

or orders that are exclusively for COTS items or receiving

contracts or orders valued at or below the micro-purchase

threshold.

1. The NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology

According to data available in the Electronic Data Access

system for fiscal years (FYs) 2016, 2017, and 2018, on an annual

basis DoD awards on average 485,859 contracts and orders that

contain DFARS clause 252.204-7012 to 39,204 unique awardees, of

which 262,509 awards (54 percent) are made to 26,468 small

entities (68 percent). While there may be some entities that

have contracts that contain the clause at 252.204-7012, but

never process CUI and, therefore, do not have to implement NIST

SP 800-171, it is not possible for DoD to estimate what fraction

of unique entities fall into this category. Assuming all of

these small entities have covered contractor information systems

that are required to be in compliance with NIST SP 800-171, then

all of these entities would be required to have, at minimum, a

Basic Assessment in order to be considered for award.

The requirement for the Basic Assessment would be imposed

through incorporation of the new solicitation provision and

contract clause in new contracts and orders. As such, the

requirement to have completed a Basic Assessment is expected to

phase-in over a three-year period, thus impacting an estimated

8,823 small entities each year. It is expected that the Medium

and High Assessments, on the other hand, will be conducted on a

finite number of awardees each year based on the capacity of the

Government to conduct these assessments. DoD estimates that 200

unique entities will undergo a Medium Assessment each year, of

which 148 are expected to be small entities. High Assessments

are expected to be conducted on approximately 110 unique

entities each year, of which 81 are expected to be small

entities. DoD Assessments are valid for three years, so small

entities will be required to renew, at minimum, their basic

assessment every three years in order to continue to receive DoD

awards or to continue performance on contracts and orders with

options. The following is a summary of the number of small

entities that will be required to undergo NIST SP 800-171 DoD

Assessments over a three-year period:

Assessment Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

Basic 8,823 8,823 8,823

Medium 148 148 148

High 81 81 81

The top five NAICS code industries expected to be impacted by

this rule are as follows: 541712, Research and Development in

the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (Except

Biotechnology); 541330, Engineering Services; 236220, Commercial

and Institutional Building Construction; 541519, Other Computer

Related Services; and 561210, Facilities Support Services.

These NAICS codes were selected based on a review of NAICS codes

associated with awards that include the clause at DFARS 252.204-

7012.

2. The CMMC Framework

Given the enterprise-wide implementation of CMMC, the

Department developed a five-year phased rollout strategy. The

rollout is intended to minimize the financial impacts to the

industrial base, especially small entities, and disruption to

the existing DoD supply chain. The Office of the Secretary of

Defense staff is coordinating with the Military Services and

Department Agencies to identify candidate contracts during the

first five years of implementation that will include the CMMC

requirement in the statement of work.

Prior to October 1, 2025, this rule impacts certain large and

small businesses that are competing on acquisitions that specify

a requirement for CMMC in the statement of work. These

businesses will be required to have the stated CMMC

certification level at the time of contract award. Inclusion of

a CMMC requirement in a solicitation during this time period

must be approved by the USD(A&S). It is estimated that 129,810

unique entities will pursue their initial CMMC certification

during the initial five-year period. By October 1, 2025, all

entities receiving DoD contracts and orders, other than

contracts or orders exclusively for commercially available off-

the-shelf items or those valued at or below the micro-purchase

threshold, will be required to have the CMMC Level identified in

the solicitation, but which at minimum will be a CMMC Level 1

certification. CMMC certifications are valid for three years;

therefore, large and small businesses will be required to renew

their certification every three years.

Based on information from the Federal Procurement Data System

(FPDS), the number of unique prime contractors is 212,657 and

the number of known unique subcontractors is 8,309. Therefore,

the total number of known unique prime contractors and

subcontractors is 220,966, of which approximately 163,391 (74

percent) are estimated to be unique small businesses. According

to FPDS, the average number of new contracts for unique

contractors is 47,905 for any given year. The timeline required

to implement CMMC across the DoD contractor population will be

approximately 7 years. The phased rollout plan for years 1-7

for small entities is detailed below with the total number of

unique DoD contractors and subcontractors specified. The

rollout assumes that for every unique prime contractor there are

approximately 100 unique subcontractors. Each small business

represented in the table would be required to pursue

recertification every three years in order to continue to do

business with DoD.

 Year Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Total

1 665 110 335 0 0 1,110

2 3,323 555 1,661 2 2 5,543

3 11,086 1,848 5,543 4 4 18,485

4 21,248 3,542 10,624 6 6 35,426

5 21,245 3,541 10,623 7 7 35,423

6 21,245 3,541 10,623 7 7 35,423

7 19,180 3,197 9,590 7 7 31,981

1-7 97,992 16,334 48,999 33 33 163,391

The top five NAICS code industries expected to be impacted by

this rule are as follows: 541712, Research and Development in

the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (Except

Biotechnology); 541330, Engineering Services; 236220, Commercial

and Institutional Building Construction; 541519, Other Computer

Related Services; and 561210, Facilities Support Services.

These NAICS codes are the same as the DoD Assessment NAICS codes

and were selected based on a review of NAICS codes associated

with awards that include the clause at FAR 52.204-21 or DFARS

252.204-7012.

D. Description of projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other

compliance requirements of the rule

Details on the compliance requirements and associated costs,

savings, and benefits of this rule are provided in the

Regulatory Impact Analysis referenced in section IV of this

preamble. The following is a summary of the compliance

requirements and the estimated costs for small entities to

undergo a DoD NIST SP 800-171 Assessment or obtain a CMMC

certification. For both the DoD Assessment Methodology and the

CMMC Framework, the estimated public costs are based on the cost

for an entity to pursue each type of assessment: The Basic,

Medium, or High Assessment under the DoD Assessment Methodology;

or the CMMC Level 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 certifications. The

estimated costs attributed to this rule do not include the costs

associated with compliance with the existing cybersecurity

requirements under the clause at FAR 52.204-21 or associated

with implementing NIST SP 800-171 in accordance with the clause

at DFARS 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

and Cyber Incident Reporting. Contractors who have been awarded

a DoD contract that include these existing contract clauses

should have already implemented these cybersecurity requirements

and incurred the associated costs; therefore, those costs are

not attributed to this rule.

1. DoD Assessment Methodology

To comply with NIST SP 800-171 a company must (1) implement

110 security requirements on their covered contractor

information systems; or (2) document in a “system security plan”

and “plans of action” those requirements that are not yet

implemented and when the requirements will be implemented. All

offerors that are required to implement NIST SP 800-171 on

covered contractor information systems pursuant to DFARS clause

252.204-7012, will be required to complete a Basic Assessment

and upload the resulting score to the Supplier Risk Management

System (SPRS), DoD's authoritative source for supplier and

product performance information. The Basic Assessment is a

self-assessment done by the contractor using a specific scoring

methodology that tells the Department how many security

requirements have not yet been implemented and is valid for

three years. A company that has fully implemented all 110 NIST

SP 800-171 security requirements, would have a score of 110 to

report in SPRS for their Basic Assessment. A company that has

unimplemented requirements will use the scoring methodology to

assign a value to each unimplemented requirement, add up those

values, and subcontract the total value from 110 to determine

their score.

In accordance with NIST SP 800-171, a contractor should

already be aware of the security requirements they have not yet

implemented and have documented plans of action for those

requirements; therefore, the burden associated with conducting a

self-assessment is the time burden associated with calculating

the score. DoD estimates that the burden to calculate the Basic

Assessment score is thirty minutes per entity at a journeyman-

level-2 rate of pay (0.50 hour * $99.08/hour =

$49.54/assessment)).
 To submit the Basic Assessment, the contractor is required to

complete 6 fields: system security plan name (if more than one

system is involved); CAGE code associated with the plan; a brief

description of the plan architecture; date of the assessment;

total score; and the date a score of 110 will be achieved. All

of this data is available from the Basic Assessment itself, the

existing system security plan, and the plans of action. The

contractor selects the date when the last plan of action will be

complete as the date when a score of 110 will be achieved. The

burden to submit a Basic Assessment for posting in SPRS is

estimated to be 15 minutes per entity at a journeyman-level-2

rate of pay (0.25 hour * $99.08/hour = $24.77/assessment)).

Therefore, the total cost per assessment per entity is

approximately $74.31 ($49.54 + $24.77).

The estimate for the rate of pay for both preparation and

submission of the Basic Assessment is journeyman-level-2, which

is an employee who has the equivalent skills, responsibilities,

and experience as a General Schedule (GS) 13 Federal Government

employee. While these are rather simple tasks that can

reasonably be completed by a GS-11 equivalent employee, or even

a GS-9 clerk, the GS-13 (or perhaps GS-11) is the most likely

grade for several reasons. First, in a small company, the

number of IT personnel are very limited. The employee that is

available to complete this task would also have significant

responsibilities for operation and maintenance of the IT system

and, therefore, be at a higher grade than would otherwise be

required if the only job was to prepare and submit the

assessment. Second, while the calculation of the assessment is

simple, the personnel who would typically have access to and

understand the system security plan and plans of action in order

to complete the Basic Assessment would be at the higher grade.

Third, while the actual submission is a simple task, the person

who would complete the assessment and submit the data in SPRS

would be the person with SPRS access/responsibilities, and

therefore at the higher grade. Fourth, given that proper

calculation of the score and its submission may well determine

whether or not the company is awarded the contract, the persons

preparing and submitting the report are likely to be at a higher

grade than is actually required to ensure this is done properly.

After a contract is awarded, DoD may choose to conduct a

Medium or High Assessment of an offer based on the criticality

of the program or the sensitivity of information being handled

by the contractor. Under both the Medium and High Assessment

DoD assessors will be reviewing the contractor’s system security

plan description of how each NIST SP 800-171 requirement is met

and will identify any descriptions that may not properly address

the security requirements. The contractor provides DoD access

to its facilities and personnel, if necessary, and prepares

for/participates in the assessment conducted by the DoD. Under

a High Assessment a contractor will be asked to demonstrate

their system security plan. DoD will post the results in SPRS.

For the Medium Assessment, DoD estimates that the burden for a

small entity to make the system security plan and supporting

documentation available for review by the DoD assessor is one

hour per entity at a journeyman-level-2 rate of pay, a cost of

$99.08/assessment (1 hour * $99.08/hour). It is estimated that

the burden for a small entity to participate in the review and

discussion of the system security plan and supporting documents

with the DoD assessor is three hours, with one journeyman-level-

2 and one senior-level-2 contractor employee participating in

the assessment, a cost of $710.40/assessment ((3 hours *

$99.08/hour = $297.24) + (3 hours * $137.72/hour = $413.16)).

Assuming issues are identified by the DoD Assessor, DoD

estimates that the burden for a small entity to determine and

provide to DoD the date by which the issues will be resolved is

one hour per entity at a journeyman-level rate of pay, a cost of

$99.08/assessment (1 hour * $99.08/hour). Therefore, total

estimated cost for a small entity that undergoes a Medium

Assessment is $908.56/assessment ($99.08 + $710.40 + $99.08).

For the High Assessment, DoD estimates that the burden for a

small entity to participate in the review and discussion of the

system security plan and supporting documents to the DoD

assessors is 116 hours per entity at a cost of

$14,542.24/assessment. The cost estimate is based on 2 senior-

level-2 employees dedicating 32 hours each, 8 senior-level-1

employees dedicating 4 hours each, and 10 journeyman-level

employees dedicating 2 hours each ((2 * 32 hours * $137.72/hour

= $8,814.08) + (8 * 4 hours * 117.08/hour = $3,746.56) + (10 *

2 hours * $99.08/hour = 1,981.60)). It is estimated that the

burden to make the system security plan and supporting

documentation available for review by the DoD assessors, prepare

for demonstration of requirements implementation, and to conduct

post review activities is 304 hours per entity, at a cost of

$36,133.76/assessment. The cost estimate is based on 2 senior-

level-2 employees dedicating 48 hours each, 8 senior-level-1

employees dedicating 16 hours each, and 10 journeyman-level

employees dedicating 8 hours each ((2 * 48 hours * $137.72/hour

= $13,221.12) + (8 * 16 hours * 117.08/hour = $14,986.24) + (10

* 8 hours * $99.08/hour = $7,926.40)). Therefore, total

estimated cost for a small entity that undergoes a High

Assessment is $50,676/assessment ($14,542.24+ $36,133.76). DoD

considers this to be the upper estimate of the cost, as it

assumes a very robust information technology workforce. For

many smaller companies, which may not have a complex information

system to manage, the information system staff will be a much

more limited, and labor that can be devoted (or is necessary) to

prepare for and participate in the assessment is likely to be

significantly less than estimated.

The following table provides the estimated annual costs for

small entities to comply with the DoD Assessment requirements of

this rule. Since assessments are valid for three years, the

cost per assessment has been divided by three to estimate the

annual cost per entity:

Annual Total Annual Cost

Cost/
Assessment Cost/ Unique All
Assessment
Entity Entities Entities

Basic $75 $25 26,469 $655,637

Medium $909 $303 444 $134,467

High $50,676 $16,892 243 $4,104,756

Total -- -- 27,156 $4,894,860

The following table presents the average annual cost per small

entity for each DoD Assessment as a percentage of the annual

revenue for a small entity for four of the top five NAICS codes.

The low-end of the range of annual revenues presented in the

table includes the average annual revenue for smaller sized

firms. The high-end of the range includes the maximum annual

revenue allowed by the Small Business Administration (SBA) for a

small business, per the SBA’s small business size standards

published at 13 CFR §121.201. NAICS code 541712 is excluded,

because it is no longer an active NAICS code and the prior size

standard was based on number of employees.

Range of Annual
Basic Assessment Medium Assessment High Assessment
NAICS Revenues for
Annual Cost as % Annual Cost as % Annual Cost as %
Code Small Businesses
of Annual Revenue of Annual Revenue of Annual Revenue
(in millions)

541330 $5 - $16.5 0.0005 - 0.0002 0.0061 - 0.0018 0.3378 - 0.1024

236220 $10 - $39.5 0.0002 - 0.0001 0.0030 - 0.0008 0.1689 - 0.0428

541519 $10 - $30.0 0.0002 - 0.0001 0.0030 - 0.0010 0.1689 - 0.0563

561210 $10 - $41.5 0.0002 - 0.0001 0.0030 - 0.0007 0.1689 - 0.0407

2. CMMC Framework

This rule adds DFARS clause 252.204-7021, Cybersecurity

Maturity Model Certification Requirement, which requires the

contractor to have the CMMC certification at the level required

in the solicitation by contract award and maintain the required

CMMC level for the duration of the contract. In order to

achieve a specific CMMC level, a DIB company must demonstrate

both process institutionalization or maturity and the

implementation of practices commensurate with that level. A DIB

contractor can achieve a specific CMMC level for its entire

enterprise network or particular segment(s) or enclave(s),

depending upon where the information to be protected is

processed, stored, or transmitted.

The following table provides a high-level description of the

processes and practices evaluated during a CMMC assessment at

each level; however, more specific information on the processes

and practices associated with each CMMC Level is available at

https://www.acq.osd.mil/cmmc/index.html.

Level Description

1 Consists of the 15 basic safeguarding requirements

from FAR clause 52.204-21.

2 Consists of 65 security requirements from NIST SP 800-

171 implemented via DFARS clause 252.204-7012, 7 CMMC

practices, and 2 CMMC processes. Intended as an

optional intermediary step for contractors as part of

their progression to Level 3.

3 Consists of all 110 security requirements from NIST SP

800-171, 20 CMMC practices, and 3 CMMC processes.

4 Consists of all 110 security requirements from NIST SP

800-171, 46 CMMC practices, and 4 CMMC processes.

5 Consists of all 110 security requirements from NIST SP

800-171, 61 CMMC practices, and 5 CMMC processes.

CMMC Assessments will be conducted by C3PAOs, which are

accredited by the CMMC-AB. C3PAOs will provide CMMC Assessment

reports to the CMMC-AB who will then maintain and store these

reports in appropriate database(s). The CMMC-AB will issue CMMC

certificates upon the resolution of any disputes or anomalies

during the conduct of the assessment. These CMMC certificates

will be distributed to the DIB contractor and the requisite

information will be posted in SPRS.

If a contractor disputes the outcome of a C3PAO assessment,

the contractor may submit a dispute adjudication request to the

CMMC-AB along with supporting information related to claimed

errors, malfeasance, or ethical lapses by the C3PAO. The CMMC-AB

will follow a formal process to review the adjudication request

and provide a preliminary evaluation to the contractor and

C3PAO. If the contractor does not accept the CMMC-AB

preliminary finding, the contractor may request an additional

assessment by the CMMC-AB staff.

The costs associated with the preparation and the conduct of

CMMC Assessments assumes that a small DIB company, in general,

possesses a less complex and less expansive IT and cybersecurity

infrastructure and operations relative to a larger DIB company.

In estimating the cost for a small DIB company to obtain a CMMC

certification, DoD took into account non-recurring engineering

costs, recurring engineering costs, the cost to participate in

the assessment, and re-certification costs:

 Nonrecurring engineering costs consist of hardware,

software, and the associated labor. The costs are incurred only

in the year of the initial assessment.

 Recurring engineering costs consist of any recurring fees

and associated labor for technology refresh. The recurring

engineering costs associated with technology refresh have been

spread uniformly over a 5-year period (i.e. 20% each year as

recurring engineering costs).

 Assessment costs consist of contractor support for pre-

assessment preparations, the actual assessment, and any post-

assessment work. These costs also include an estimate of the

potential C3PAO costs for conducting CMMC Assessment, which are

comprised of labor for supporting pre-assessment preparations,

actual assessment, and post-assessment work, plus travel cost.

 Re-certification costs are the same as the initial

certification cost.

The following is a summary of the estimated costs for a small

entity to achieve certification at each CMMC Level.

i. Level 1 Certification

Contractors pursuing a Level 1 Certification should have

already implemented the 15 existing basic safeguarding

requirements under FAR clause 52.204-21. Therefore, there are

no estimated nonrecurring or recurring engineering costs

associated with CMMC Level 1.

DoD estimates that the cost for a small entity to support a

CMMC Level 1 Assessment or recertification is $2,999.56:

 Contractor Support. It is estimated that one journeyman-

level-1 employee will dedicate 14 hours to support the

assessment (8 hours for pre- and post-assessment support + 6

hours for the assessment). The estimated cost is $1,166.48 (1

journeyman * $83.32/hour * 14 hours).

 C3PAO Assessment. It is estimated that one journeyman-

level-1 employee will dedicate 19 hours to conduct he assessment

(8 hours for pre- and post-assessment support + 6 hours for the

assessment + 5 hours for travel). Each employee is estimated to

have 1 day of per diem for travel. The estimated cost is

$1,833.08 ((1 journeyman * $83.32/hour * 19 hours = $1,583.08) +

(1 employees * 1 day * $250/day = $250 travel costs)).

ii. Level 2 Certification

Contractors pursuing a Level 2 Certification should have

already implemented the 65 existing NIST SP 800-171 security

requirements. Therefore, the estimated engineering costs per

small entity is associated with implementation of 9 new

requirements (7 CMMC practices and 2 CMMC processes). The

estimated nonrecurring engineering cost per entity per

assessment/recertification is $8,135. The estimated recurring

engineering cost per entity per year is $20,154.

DoD estimates that the cost for a small entity to support a

CMMC Level 2 Assessment or recertification is $22,466.88.

 Contractor Support. It is estimated that two senior-

level-1 employees will dedicate 48 hours each to support the

assessment (24 hours for pre- and post-assessment support + 24

hours for the assessment). The estimated cost is $11,239.68 (2

senior * $117.08/hour * 48 hours).

 C3PAO Assessment. It is estimated that one journeyman-

level-2 employee and one senior-level-1 employee will dedicate

45 hours each to conduct the assessment (16 hours for pre- and

post-assessment support + 24 hours for the assessment + 5 hours

for travel). Each employee is estimated to have 3 days of per

diem for travel. The estimated cost is $11,227.20 ((1 senior *

$117.08/hour * 45 hours = $5,268.60) + (1 journeyman *

$99.08/hour * 45 hours = $4,458.60) + (2 employees * 3 days *

$250/day = $1,500 travel costs)).

iii. Level 3 Certification

Contractors pursuing a Level 3 Certification should have

already implemented the 110 existing NIST SP 800-171 security

requirements. Therefore, the estimated engineering costs per

small entity is associated with implementation 23 new

requirements (20 CMMC practices and 3 CMMC processes). The

estimated nonrecurring engineering cost per entity per

assessment/recertification is $26,214. The estimated recurring

engineering cost per entity per year is $41,666.

DoD estimates that the cost for a small entity to support a

CMMC Level 3 assessment or recertification is $51,095.60.

 Contractor Support. It is estimated that three senior-

level-1 employees will dedicate 64 hours each to support the

assessment (32 hours for pre- and post-assessment support + 32

hours for the assessment). The estimated cost is $22,479.36 (3

seniors * $117.08/hour * 64 hours).

 C3PAO Assessment. It is estimated that one senior-

level-1 employee and three journeyman-level-2 employees will

dedicate 57 hours each to conduct the assessment (24 hours for

pre- and post-assessment support + 32 hours for the assessment +

5 hours for travel). Each employee is estimated to have 5 days

of per diem for travel. The estimated cost is $28,616.24 ((1

senior * $117.08/hour * 57 hours = $6,673.56) + (3 journeyman *

$99.08/hour * 57 hours = $16,942.68) + (4 employees * 5 days *

$250/day = $5,000 travel costs)).

iv. Level 4 Certification

Contractors pursuing a Level 4 Certification should have

already implemented the 110 existing NIST SP 800-171 security

requirements. Therefore, the estimated engineering costs per

small entity is associated with implementation 50 new

requirements (46 CMMC practices and 4 CMMC processes). The

estimated nonrecurring engineering cost per entity per

assessment/recertification is $938,336. The estimated recurring

engineering cost per entity per year is $301,514.

DoD estimates that the cost for a small entity to support a

CMMC Level 4 Assessment or recertification is $70,065.04.

  Contractor Support. It is estimated that three senior-

level-2 employees will dedicate 80 hours each to support the

assessment (40 hours for pre- and post-assessment support + 40

hours for the assessment). The estimated cost is $33,052.80 (3

seniors * $137.72/hour * 80 hours)

 C3PAO Assessment. It is estimated that one senior-

level-2 employee and three journeyman-level-2 employees will

dedicate 69 hours each to conduct the assessment (32 hours for

pre- and post-assessment support + 48 hours for the assessment +

5 hours for travel). Each employee is estimated to have 5 days

of per diem for travel, plus airfare. The estimated cost is

$37,012.24 ((1 senior * $137.72/hour * 69 hours = $9502.68) + (3

journeyman * $99.08/hour * 69 hours = $20,509.56) + (4 employees

* 5 days * $250/day = $5,000 travel costs) + (4 employees * $500

= $2,000 airfare)).

v. Level 5 Certification

Contractors pursuing a Level 5 Certification should have

already implemented the 110 existing NIST SP 800-171 security

requirements. Therefore, the estimated engineering costs per

small entity is associated with implementation 66 new

requirements (61 CMMC practices and 5 CMMC processes). The

estimated nonrecurring engineering cost per entity per

assessment/recertification is $1,230,214. The estimated

recurring engineering cost per entity per year is $384,666.

 DoD estimates that the cost for a small entity to support a

CMMC Level 5 Assessment or recertification is $110,090.80.

 Contractor Support. It is estimated that four senior-

level-2 employees will dedicate 104 hours each to support the

assessment (48 hours for pre- and post-assessment support + 56

hours for the assessment). The estimated cost is $57,291.52 (4

senior * $137.72/hour * 104 hours).

 C3PAO Assessment. It is estimated that one senior-

level-2 employee, two senior-level-1 employees, and one

journeyman-level-2 employee will dedicate 93 hours each to

conduct the assessment (32 hours for pre- and post-assessment

support + 56 hours for the assessment + 5 hours for travel).

Each employee is estimated to have 7 days of per diem for

travel. The estimated cost is $52,799.28 ((1 senior *

$137.72/hour * 93 hours = $12,807.96) + (2 senior * $117.08/hour

* 93 hours = $21,776.88) + (1 journeyman * $99.08/hour * 93

hours = $9,214.44) + (4 employees * 7 days * $250/day = $7,000

travel costs) + (4 employees * $500 = $2,000 airfare)).

vi. Total Estimated Annual Costs

The following table provides a summary of the total estimated

annual costs for an individual small entity to obtain each CMMC

certification level. Nonrecurring engineering costs are

spread over a 20-year period to determine the average annual

cost per entity. Assessment costs have been spread over a 3-

year period, since entities will participate in a reassessment

every 3 years.

Average
Recurring Average Total Annual
Nonrecurring
CMMC Cert Engineering Assessment Assessment
Engineering
Costs Costs Cost
Costs

Level 1 $0 $0 $1,000 $1,000

Level 2 $407 $20,154 $7,489 $28,050

Level 3 $1,311 $41,666 $17,032 $60,009

Level 4 $46,917 $301,514 $23,355 $371,786

Level 5 $61,511 $384,666 $36,697 $482,874

The following table presents the average annual cost per small

entity for CMMC certifications at levels 1 through 3 as a

percentage of the annual revenue for a small entity for four of

the top five NAICS codes. The low-end of the range of annual

revenues presented in the table includes the average annual

revenue for smaller sized firms. The high-end of the range

includes the maximum annual revenue allowed by the SBA for a

small business, per the SBA’s small business size standards

published at 13 CFR §121.201. NAICS code 541712 is excluded,

because it is no longer an active NAICS code and the prior size

standard was based on number of employees.

 Range of Annual
CMMC Level 1 CMMC Level 2 CMMC Level 3
NAICS Revenues for
Annual Cost as % Annual Cost as % Annual Cost as %
Code Small Businesses
of Annual Revenue of Annual Revenue of Annual Revenue
(in millions)

541330 $5 - $16.5 0.0200 - 0.0061 0.5610 – 0.1700 1.2002 – 0.3637

236220 $10 - $39.5 0.0100 – 0.0025 0.2805 – 0.0710 0.6001 – 0.1519

541519 $10 - $30.0 0.0100 – 0.0033 0.2805 – 0.0935 0.6001 – 0.2000

561210 $10 - $41.5 0.0100 – 0.0024 0.2805 – 0.0676 0.6001 – 0.1446

For CMMC certification at levels 4 and 5, the following table

presents the annual cost per small entity for CMMC certification

at levels 4 and 5 as a percentage of the low, average, and high

annual revenues for entities that have represented themselves as

small in the System for Award Management (SAM) for their primary

NAICS code and are performing on contracts that could be subject

to a CMMC level 4 or 5 certification requirements. The values

of the low, average, and high annual revenues are based on an

average of the annual receipt reported in SAM by such entities

for FY16 through FY20.

Annual Revenue of

FY16 Entities Level 4 Certification Level 5 Certification

thru Represented as Cost as % of Annual Cost as % of Annual

FY20 Small for Primary Revenue Revenue

NAICS

Low $6.5 million 5.67% 7.36%

Average $22.9 million 1.62% 2.11%

 High $85 million 0.43% 0.56%

The following is a summary of the estimated annual costs in

millions for all 163,391 small entities to achieve their initial

CMMC certifications (and recertifications every three years)

over a 10-year period:

Year Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5

1 $1.99 $5.58 $39.86 $0.00 $0.00

2 $9.97 $30.39 $211.58 $2.62 $3.45

3 $33.25 $107.20 $742.65 $5.84 $7.67

4 $65.73 $232.90 $1,595.23 $9.67 $12.66

5 $73.69 $314.23 $2,105.53 $12.93 $16.91

6 $96.98 $414.64 $2,746.50 $15.18 $19.82

7 $123.26 $509.08 $3,342.95 $17.43 $22.74

8 $73.69 $421.22 $2,669.25 $10.58 $13.68

9 $96.98 $450.27 $2,867.60 $10.72 $13.90

10 $123.26 $483.07 $3,091.56 $10.86 $14.13

E. Relevant Federal rules, which may duplicate, overlap, or

conflict with the rule

The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any

other Federal rules. Rather this rule validates and verifies

contractor compliance with the existing cybersecurity

requirements in FAR clause 52.204-21 and DFARS clause 252.204-

7012, and ensures that the entire DIB sector has the appropriate
cybersecurity processes and practices in place to properly

protect FCI and CUI during performance of DoD contracts.

F. Description of any significant alternatives to the rule

which accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes

and which minimize any significant economic impact of the rule

on small entities

DoD considered and adopted several alternatives during the

development of this rule that reduce the burden on small

entities and still meet the objectives of the rule. These

alternatives include: (1) exempting contracts and orders

exclusively for the acquisition of commercially available off-

the-shelf items; and (2) implementing a phased rollout for the

CMMC portion of the rule and stipulating that the inclusion a

CMMC requirement in new contracts until that time be approved by

the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and

Sustainment. Additional alternatives were considered, however,

it was determined that these other alternatives did not achieve

the intended policy outcome.

1. CMMC Model and Implementation

The Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) referenced in section IV

of this preamble estimates that the total number of unique DoD

contractors and subcontractors is 220,966, with approximately

163,391 or 74% being small entities. The RIA also specifies the

estimates for the percentage of all contractors and

subcontractors associated with each CMMC level. These estimates

indicate that the vast majority of small entities (i.e. 163,325

of 163,391 or 99.96%) will be required to achieve CMMC Level 1-3

certificates during the initial rollout. The Department looked

at Levels 1 through 5 to determine if there were alternatives

and whether these alternatives met the intended policy outcome.

For CMMC Level 1, the practices map directly to the basic

safeguarding requirements specified in the clause at FAR 52.204-

21. The phased rollout estimates that the majority of small

entities (i.e. 97,992 of the 163,325 or 60%) will be required to

achieve CMMC Level 1. The planned implementation of CMMC Level

1 adds a verification component to the existing FAR clause by

including an on-site assessment by a credentialed assessor from

an accredited C3PAO. The on-site assessment verifies the

implementation of the required cybersecurity practices and

further supports the physical identification of contractors and

subcontractors in the DoD supply chain. In the aggregate, the

estimated cost associated with supporting this on-site

assessment and approximated C3PAO fees does not represent a

cost-driver with respect to CMMC costs to small entities across

levels. An alternative to an on-site assessment is for

contractors to provide documentation and supporting evidence of

the proper implementation of the required cybersecurity

practices through a secure online portal. These artifacts would

then be reviewed and checked virtually by an accredited assessor

prior to the CMMC-AB issuing a CMMC Level 1 certificate. The

drawback of this alternative is the inability of the contractor

to interact with the C3PAO assessor in person and provide

evidence directly without transmitting proprietary information.

Small entities will not receive as much meaningful and

interactive feedback that would be part of a Level 1 on-site

assessment.

For CMMC Level 2, the practices encompass only 48 of the 110

security requirements of NIST SP 800-171, as specified in DFARS

clause 252.204-7012, and 7 additional cybersecurity

requirements. In addition, CMMC Level 2 includes two process

maturity requirements. The phased rollout estimates that

approximately 10% of small entities may choose to use Level 2 as

a transition step from Level 1 to Level 3. Small entities that

achieve Level 1 can seek to achieve Level 3 (without first

achieving a Level 2 certification) if the necessary

cybersecurity practices and processes have been implemented.

The Department does not anticipate releasing new contracts that

require contractors to achieve CMMC Level 2. As a result, the

Department did not consider alternatives with respect to CMMC

Level 2.

For CMMC Level 3, the practices encompass all the 110 security

requirements of NIST SP 800-171, as specified in DFARS clause

252.204-7012, as well as 13 additional cybersecurity

requirements above Level 2. In addition, CMMC Level 3 includes

three process maturity requirements. These additional

cybersecurity practices were incorporated based upon several

considerations that included public comments from September to

December 2019 on draft versions of the model, inputs from the

DIB Sector Coordinating Council (SCC), cybersecurity threats,

the progression of cybersecurity capabilities from Level 3 to

Levels 4, and other factors. The CMMC phased rollout estimates

that 48,999 of the 163,325 small entities or 30% will be

required to achieve CMMC Level 3. The alternatives considered

include removing a subset or all of the 20 additional practices

at Level 3 or moving a subset or all of the 20 additional

practices from Level 3 to Level 4. The primary drawback of

these alternatives is that the cybersecurity capability gaps

associated with protecting CUI will not be addressed until Level

4, which will apply to a relatively small percentage of non-

small and small entities. Furthermore, the progression of

cybersecurity capabilities from Level 3 to Level 4 becomes more

abrupt.

For CMMC Level 4, the practices encompass the 110 security

requirements of NIST SP 800-171 as specified in DFARS clause

252.204-7012 and 46 additional cybersecurity requirements. More

specifically, CMMC Level 4 adds 26 enhanced security

requirements above CMMC Level 3, of which 13 are derived from

Draft NIST SP 800-171B. In addition, CMMC Level 4 includes four

process maturity requirements. The DIB SCC and the public

contributed to the specification of the other 13 enhanced

security requirements. For CMMC Level 4, an alternative

considered is to define a threshold for contractors to meet 15

out of the 26 enhanced security requirements. In addition,

contractors will be required to meet 6 out of the 11 remaining

non-threshold enhanced security requirements. This alternative

implies that a contractor will have to implement 21 of the 26

enhanced security requirements as well as the associated

maturity processes. A drawback of this alternative is that

contractors implement a different subset of the 11 non-threshold

requirements which in turn, leads to a non-uniform set of

cybersecurity capabilities across those certified at Level 4.

For CMMC Level 5, the practices encompass the 110 security

requirements of NIST SP 800-171 as specified in DFARS clause

252.204-7012 and 61 additional cybersecurity requirements. More

specifically, CMMC Level 5 adds 15 enhanced security

requirements above CMMC Level 4, of which 4 are derived from

Draft NIST SP 800-171B. In addition, CMMC Level 5 includes five

process maturity requirements. The DIB SCC and the public

contributed to the specification of the other 11 enhanced

security requirements. For CMMC Level 5, the alternative

considered is to define a threshold for contractors to meet 6

out of the 15 enhanced security requirements. In addition,

contractors will be required to meet 5 out of the 9 remaining

non-threshold enhanced security requirements. This alternative

implies that a contractor will have implemented 11 of the 15

enhanced security requirements as well as the associated

maturity processes. A drawback of this alternative is that

contractors implement a different subset of the 9 non-threshold

requirements which in turn, leads to a non-uniform set of

cybersecurity capabilities across those certified at Level 5.

2. Timing of CMMC level certification requirement

In addition to evaluating the make-up of the CMMC levels, the

Department took into consideration the timing of the requirement

to achieve a CMMC level certification: (1) at time of proposal

or offer submission, (2) in order to receive award, or (3) post

contract award. The Department ultimately adopted alternative 2

to require certification at the time of award. The drawback of

alternative 1 (at time of proposal or offer submission) is the

increased risk for contractors since they may not have

sufficient time to achieve the required CMMC certification after

the release of the Request for Information (RFI). The drawback

of alternative 3 (after contract award) is the increased risk to

the Department with respect to the schedule and uncertainty with

respect to the case where the contractor is unable to achieve

the required CMMC level in a reasonable amount of time given

their current cybersecurity posture. This potential delay would

apply to the entire supply chain and prevent the appropriate

flow of CUI and FCI. The Department seeks public comment on the

timing of contract award, to include the effect of requiring

certification at time of award on small businesses.

DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other

interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small

entities. DoD will also consider comments from small entities

concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this

rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must

submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610

(DFARS Case 2019–D041), in correspondence.

VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)

(PRA) provides that an agency generally cannot conduct or

sponsor a collection of information, and no person is required

to respond to nor be subject to a penalty for failure to comply

with a collection of information, unless that collection has

obtained OMB approval and displays a currently valid OMB Control

Number.

DoD requested, and OMB authorized, emergency processing of the

collection of information tied to this rule, as OMB Control

Number 0750-0004, Assessing Contractor Implementation of

Cybersecurity Requirements, consistent with 5 CFR 1320.13.

DoD has determined the following conditions have been met:

a. The collection of information is needed prior to the

expiration of time periods normally associated with a routine

submission for review under the provisions of the PRA, to enable

the Department to immediately begin assessing the current status

of contractor implementation of NIST SP 800-171 on their

information systems that process CUI.

b. The collection of information is essential to DoD’s

mission. The collection of information is essential to DoD’s

mission. The National Defense Strategy (NDS) and DoD Cyber

Strategy highlight the importance of protecting the Defense

Industrial Base (DIB) to maintain national and economic

security. To this end, DoD requires defense contractors and

subcontractors to implement the NIST SP 800-171 security

requirements on information systems that handle CUI, pursuant to

DFARS clause 252.204-7012. This DoD Assessment Methodology

enables the Department to assess strategically, at a corporate-

level, contractor implementation of the NIST SP 800-171 security

requirements. Results of a NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment

reflect the net effect of NIST SP 800-171 security requirements

not yet implemented by a contractor.

 c. Moreover, DoD cannot comply with the normal clearance

procedures, because public harm is reasonably likely to result

if current clearance procedures are followed. Authorizing

collection of this information on the effective date will

motivate defense contractors and subcontractors who have not yet

implemented existing NIST SP 800-171 security requirements, to

take action to implement the security requirements on covered

information systems that process CUI, in order to protect our

national and economic security interests. The aggregate loss of

sensitive controlled unclassified information and intellectual

property from the DIB sector could undermine U.S. technological

advantages and increase risk to DoD missions.

Upon publication of this rule, DoD intends to provide a

separate 60-day notice in the Federal Register requesting public

comment for OMB Control Number 0750-0004, Assessing Contractor

Implementation of Cybersecurity Requirements.

DOD estimates the annual public reporting burden for the

information collection as follows:

a. Basic Assessment

Respondents: 13,068.

Responses per respondent: 1.

Total annual responses: 13,068.

Hours per response: .75.

Total burden hours: 9,801.

b. Medium Assessment

Respondents: 200.

Responses per respondent: 1.

Total annual responses: 200.

Hours per response: 8.

Total burden hours: 1,600.

c. High Assessment

Respondents: 110.

Responses per respondent: 1.

Total annual responses: 110.

Hours per response: 420.

Total burden hours: 46,200.

d. Total Public Burden (All Entities)

Respondents: 13,068.

Total annual responses: 13,378.

Total burden hours: 57,601.

e. Total Public Burden (Small Entities)

Respondents: 8,823.

Total annual responses: 9,023.

Total burden hours: 41,821.

The requirement to collect information from offerors and

contractors regarding the status of their implementation of NIST

SP 800-171 on their information systems that process CUI, is

being imposed via a new solicitation provision and contract

clause. Per the new provision, if an offeror is required to

have implemented the NIST SP 800-171 security requirements on

their information systems pursuant to DFARS clause 252.204-7012,

then the offeror must have, at minimum, a current self-

assessment (or Basic Assessment) uploaded to DoD’s Supplier

Performance Risk System, in order to be considered for award.

Depending on the criticality of the acquisition program, after

contract award, certain contractors may be required to

participate in a Medium or High assessment to be conducted by

DoD assessor. During these post-award assessments, contractors

will be required to demonstrate their implementation of NIST SP

800-171 security requirements. Results of a NIST SP 800-171 DoD

Assessment reflect the net effect of NIST SP 800-171 security

requirements not yet implemented by a contractor.

IX. Determination to Issue an Interim Rule

A determination has been made under the authority of the

Secretary of Defense that urgent and compelling reasons exist to

promulgate this interim rule without prior opportunity for

public comment pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1707(d) and FAR 1.501-3(b).

Malicious cyber actors have targeted, and continue to target,

the DIB sector, which consists of over 200,000 small-to-large

sized entities that support the warfighter. In particular,

actors ranging from cyber criminals to nation-states continue to

attack companies and organizations that comprise the

Department’s multi-tier supply chain including smaller entities

at the lower tiers. These actors seek to steal DoD’s

intellectual property to undercut the United States’ strategic

and technological advantage and to benefit their own military

and economic development.

The Department has been focused on improving the cyber

resiliency and security of the DIB sector for over a decade as

evidenced by the development of minimum cybersecurity standards

and the implementation of those standards in the National

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special

Publications (SP) and implementation of those standards in the

FAR and DFARS. In 2013, DoD issued a final DFARS rule (78 FR

69273) that required contractors to implement a select number of

security measures from NIST SP 800-53, Recommended Security

Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations, to

facilitate safeguarding unclassified DoD information within

contractor information systems from unauthorized access and

disclosure. In 2015, DoD issued an interim DFARS rule (80 FR

81472) requiring contractors that handle Controlled Unclassified

Information (CUI) on their information systems to transition by

December 31, 2017, from NIST SP 800-53 to NIST SP 800-171,

Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal

Information Systems and Organizations. NIST SP 800-171 was not

only easier to use, but also provided security requirements that

greatly increases the protections of Government information in

contractor information systems once implemented. And, in 2016,

the FAR Council mandated the use of FAR clause 52.204-21, Basic

Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems, to

require all Government contractors to implement, at minimum,

some basic policies and practices to safeguard Federal Contract

Information (FCI) within their information systems. Since then,

the Department has been engaging with industry on improving

their compliance with these exiting cybersecurity requirements

and developing a framework to institutionalize cybersecurity

process and practices throughout the DIB sector.

Notwithstanding the fact that these minimum cybersecurity

standards have been in effect on DoD contracts since as early as

2013, several surveys and questionnaires by defense industrial

associations have highlighted the DIB sector’s continued

challenges in achieving broad implementation of these security

requirements. In a 2017 questionnaire, contractors and

subcontractors that responded acknowledged implementation rates

of 38% to 54% for at least 10 of the 110 security requirements

of NIST SP 800-171.1 In a separate 2018 survey, 36% of

contractors who responded indicated a lack of awareness of DFARS

clause 252.204-7012 and 45% of contractors acknowledged not

1 Aerospace Industries Association. “Complying with NIST 800-171.” Fall 2017.

having read NIST SP 800-171.2 In a 2019 survey, contractors that

responded rated their level of preparedness for a Defense

Contract Management Agency standard assessment of contractor

implementation of NIST SP 800-171 at 56%.3 Furthermore, for the

High Assessments conducted on-site by DoD to date, only 36% of

contractors demonstrated implementation of all 110 of the NIST

SP 800-171 security requirements.

Although these industry surveys represent a small sample of

the DIB sector, the results were reinforced by the findings from

DoD Inspector General report in 2019 (DODIG-2019-105 “Audit of

Protection of DoD Controlled Unclassified Information on

Contractor-Owned Networks and Systems”) indicate that DoD

contractors did not consistently implement mandated system

security requirements for safeguarding CUI and recommended that

DoD take immediate steps to assess a contractor’s ability to

protect this information. The report emphasizes that malicious

actors can exploit the vulnerabilities of contractors’ networks

and systems and exfiltrate information related to some of the

Nation’s most valuable advanced defense technologies.

Defense contractors must begin viewing cybersecurity as a part

of doing business, in order to protect themselves and to protect

2 National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA). “Implementing Cybersecurity in DoD Supply Chains.” White
Paper. July 2018.
3 NDIA. “Beyond Obfuscation: The Defense Industry’s Position within Federal Cybersecurity Policy.” A Report of

the NDIA Policy Department. October 2018. page 20 and page 24.
national security. The various industry surveys and Government

assessments conducted to date illustrate the following: absent

a requirement for defense contractors to demonstrate

implementation of standard cybersecurity processes and

practices, cybersecurity requirements will not be fully

implemented, leaving DoD and the DIB unprotected and vulnerable

to malicious cyber activity. To this end, section 1648 of the

NDAA for FY 2020 (Pub. L. 116-92) directed the Secretary of

Defense to develop a consistent, comprehensive framework to

enhance cybersecurity for the U.S. defense industrial base no

later than February 1, 2020. In the Senate Armed Services

Committee Report to accompany the NDAA for FY 2020, the

Committee expressed concern that DIB contractors are an inviting

target for our adversaries, who have been conducting

cyberattacks to steal critical military technologies.

Developing a framework to enhance the cybersecurity of the

defense industrial base will serve as an important first step

toward securing the supply chain. Pursuant to section 1648, DoD

has developed the CMMC Framework, which gives the Department a

mechanism to certify the cyber posture of its largest defense

contractors to the smallest firms in our supply chain, who have

become primary targets of malicious cyber activity.

 This rule is an important part of the cybersecurity

framework,4 and builds on the existing FAR and DFARS clause

cybersecurity requirements by (1) adding a mechanism to

immediately begin assessing the current status of contractor

implementation of NIST SP 800-171 on their information systems

that process CUI; and (2) to require contractors and

subcontractors to take steps to fully implement existing

cybersecurity requirements, plus additional processes and

practices, to protect FCI and CUI on their information systems

in preparation for verification under the CMMC Framework. There

is an urgent need for DoD to immediately begin assessing where

vulnerabilities in its supply chain exist and take steps to

correct such deficiencies, which can be accomplished by

requiring contractors and subcontractors that handle DoD CUI on

their information systems to complete a NIST SP 800-171 Basic

Assessment. In fact, while this rule includes a delayed

effective date, contractors and subcontractors that are required

to implement NIST SP 800-171 pursuant to DFARS clause 252.204-

7012, are encouraged to immediately conduct and submit a self-

assessment as described in this rule to facilitate the

Department’s assessment.

4Section 1648 of the NDAA for FY 2020 mandates the formulation of “unified cybersecurity . . . regulations . . . to
be imposed on the defense industrial base for the purpose of assessing the cybersecurity of individual contractors,”
 It is equally urgent for the Department to ensure DIB

contractors that have not fully implemented the basic

safeguarding requirements under FAR clause 52.204-21 or the NIST

SP 800-171 security requirements pursuant to DFARS 252.204-7012

begin correcting these deficiencies immediately. These are

cybersecurity requirements contractors and subcontractors should

have already implemented (or in the case of implementation of

NIST SP 800-171, have plans of action to correct deficiencies)

on information systems that handle CUI. Under the CMMC

Framework, a contractor is able to achieve CMMC Level 1

Certification if they can demonstrate implementation of the

basic safeguarding requirements in the FAR clause. Similarly, a

contractor is able to achieve CMMC Level 3 if they can

demonstrate implementation of the NIST SP 800-171 security

requirements, plus some additional processes and practices.

This rule ensures contractors and subcontractors focus on full

implementation of existing cybersecurity requirements on their

information systems and expedites the Department’s ability to

secure its supply chain.

For the foregoing reasons, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1707(d), DoD

finds that urgent and compelling circumstances make compliance

with the notice and comment requirements of 41 U.S.C. 1707(a)

impracticable, and invokes the exception to those requirements

under 41 U.S.C. 1707(d) and FAR 1.501-3(b).5 While a public

comment process will not be completed prior to the rule’s

effective date, DoD has incorporated feedback solicited through

extensive outreach already undertaken pursuant to section

1648(d) of the NDAA for FY 2020, including through public

meetings and extensive industry outreach conducted over the past

year. However, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 1707 and FAR 1.501-3(b),

DoD will consider public comments received in response to this

interim rule in the formation of the final rule.

List of Subjects in 204, 212, 217, and 252

Government procurement.

Jennifer D. Johnson,

Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations

System.

Therefore, 48 CFR parts 204, 212, 217, and 252 are amended as

follows:

1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 204, 212, 217, and

252 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

PART 204—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

5FAR 1.501-3(b) states that “[a]dvance comments need not be solicited when urgent and compelling circumstances
make solicitation of comments impracticable prior to the effective date of the coverage, such as when a new statute
must be implemented in a relatively short period of time. In such case, the coverage shall be issued on a temporary
basis and shall provide for at least a 30 day public comment period.”
2. Amend section 204.7302 by revising paragraph (a) to read as

follows:

204.7302 Policy.

(a)(1) Contractors and subcontractors are required to provide

adequate security on all covered contractor information systems.

(2) Contractors required to implement NIST SP 800-171, in

accordance with the clause at 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered

Defense Information and Cyber incident Reporting, are required

at time of award to have at least a Basic NIST SP 800-171 DoD

Assessment that is current (i.e., not more than 3 years old

unless a lesser time is specified in the solicitation) (see

252.204-7019).

(3) The NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology is

located at

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/cyber/strategically_assessing_c

ontractor_implementation_of_NIST_SP_800-171.html.

(4) High NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessments will be conducted

by Government personnel using NIST SP 800-171A, “Assessing

Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information.”

(5) The NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment will not duplicate

efforts from any other DoD assessment or the Cybersecurity

Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) (see subpart 204.75), except

for rare circumstances when a re-assessment may be necessary,

such as, but not limited to, when cybersecurity risks, threats,
or awareness have changed, requiring a re-assessment to ensure

current compliance.

* * * * *

3. Revise section 204.7303 to read as follows:

204.7303 Procedures.

(a) Follow the procedures relating to safeguarding covered

defense information at PGI 204.7303.

(b) The contracting officer shall verify that the summary

level score of a current NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment (i.e.,

not more than 3 years old, unless a lesser time is specified in

the solicitation) (see 252.204-7019) for each covered contractor

information system that is relevant to an offer, contract, task

order, or delivery order are posted in Supplier Performance Risk

System (SPRS) (https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/), prior to—

(1) Awarding a contract, task order, or delivery order to

an offeror or contractor that is required to implement NIST SP

800-171 in accordance with the clause at 252.204-7012; or

(2) Exercising an option period or extending the period of

performance on a contract, task order, or delivery order with a

contractor that is that is required to implement the NIST SP

800-171 in accordance with the clause at 252.204-7012.

4. Amend section 204.7304 by revising the section heading and

adding paragraphs (d) and (e) to read as follows:

204.7304 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

* * * * *

(d) Use the provision at 252.204-7019, Notice of NIST SP 800-

171 DoD Assessment Requirements, in all solicitations, including

solicitations using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition

of commercial items, except for solicitations solely for the

acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS)

items.

(e) Use the clause at 252.204-7020, NIST SP 800-171 DoD

Assessment Requirements, in all solicitations and contracts,

task orders, or delivery orders, including those using FAR part

12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial items, except

for those that are solely for the acquisition of COTS items.

5. Add subpart 204.75, consisting of 204.7500 through 204.7503,

to read as follows:

SUBPART 204.75–CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION

Sec.

204.7500 Scope of subpart.

204.7501 Policy.

204.7502 Procedures.

204.7503 Contract clause.

SUBPART 204.75–CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION

204.7500 Scope of subpart.

(a) This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for

including the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC)

level requirements in DoD contracts. CMMC is a framework that

measures a contractor’s cybersecurity maturity to include the

implementation of cybersecurity practices and

institutionalization of processes (see

https://www.acq.osd.mil/cmmc/index.html).

(b) This subpart does not abrogate any other requirements

regarding contractor physical, personnel, information,

technical, or general administrative security operations

governing the protection of unclassified information, nor does

it affect requirements of the National Industrial Security

Program.

204.7501 Policy.

(a) The contracting officer shall include in the solicitation

the required CMMC level, if provided by the requiring activity.

Contracting officers shall not award a contract, task order, or

delivery order to an offeror that does not have a current (i.e.,

not more than 3 years old) CMMC certificate at the level

required by the solicitation.

(b) Contractors are required to achieve, at time of award, a

CMMC certificate at the level specified in the solicitation.

Contractors are required to maintain a current (i.e., not more

than 3 years old) CMMC certificate at the specified level, if

required by the statement of work or requirement document,

throughout the life of the contract, task order, or delivery

order. Contracting officers shall not exercise an option period

or extend the period of performance on a contract, task order,

or delivery order, unless the contract has a current (i.e., not

more than 3 years old) CMMC certificate at the level required by

the contract, task order, or delivery order.

(c) The CMMC Assessments shall not duplicate efforts from any

other comparable DoD assessment, except for rare circumstances

when a re-assessment may be necessary such as, but not limited

to when there are indications of issues with cybersecurity

and/or compliance with CMMC requirements.

204.7502 Procedures.

(a) When a requiring activity identifies a requirement for a

contract, task order, or delivery order to include a specific

CMMC level, the contracting officer shall not—

(1) Award to an offeror that does not have a CMMC

certificate at the level required by the solicitation; or

(2) Exercise an option or extend any period of performance

on a contract, task order, or delivery order unless the

contractor has a CMMC certificate at the level required by the

contract.

(b) Contracting officers shall use Supplier Performance Risk

System (SPRS) (https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/) to verify an

offeror or contractor’s CMMC level.

204.7503 Contract clause.

 Use the clause at 252.204-7021, Cybersecurity Maturity Model

Certification Requirements, as follows:

(a) Until September 30, 2025, in solicitations and contracts

or task orders or delivery orders, including those using FAR

part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial items,

except for solicitations and contracts or orders solely for the

acquisition of commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS)

items, if the requirement document or statement of work requires

a contractor to have a specific CMMC level. In order to

implement a phased rollout of CMMC, inclusion of a CMMC

requirement in a solicitation during this time period must be

approved by OUSD(A&S).

(b) On or after October 1, 2025, in all solicitations and

contracts or task orders or delivery orders, including those

using FAR part 12 procedures for the acquisition of commercial

items, except for solicitations and contracts or orders solely

for the acquisition of COTS items.

PART 212—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

6. Amend section 212.301, by adding paragraphs (f)(ii)(K), (L),

and (M) to read as follows:

212.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for

acquisition of commercial items.

* * * * *

(f) * * *
 (ii) * * *

(K) Use the provision at 252.204-7019, Notice of NIST SP

800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements, as prescribed in 204.7304(d).

(L) Use the clause at 252.204-7020, NIST SP 800-171 DoD

Assessment Requirements, as prescribed in 204.7304(e).

(M) Use the clause at 252.204-7021, Cybersecurity Maturity

Model Certification Requirements, as prescribed in 204.7503(a) and

(b).

* * * * *

PART 217—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

7. Amend section 217.207 by revising paragraph (c) to read as

follows:

217.207 Exercise of options.

(c) In addition to the requirements at FAR 17.207(c), exercise

an option only after:

(1) Determining that the contractor's record in the System

for Award Management database is active and the contractor's Data

Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number, Commercial and Government

Entity (CAGE) code, name, and physical address are accurately

reflected in the contract document. See PGI 217.207 for the

requirement to perform cost or price analysis of spare parts prior

to exercising any option for firm-fixed-price contracts containing

spare parts.

(2) Verifying in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS)

(https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/) that—

(i) The summary level score of a current NIST SP 800-171

DoD Assessment (i.e., not more than 3 years old, unless a lesser

time is specified in the solicitation) for each covered contractor

information system that is relevant to an offer, contract, task

order, or delivery order are posted (see 204.7303).

(ii) The contractor has a CMMC certificate at the level

required by the contract, and that it is current (i.e., not more

than 3 years old) (see 204.7502).

PART 252—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

8. Add sections 252.204-7019, 252.204-7020, and 252.204-7021 to

read as follows:

Sec.

* * * * *

252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment

Requirements.
252.204-7020 NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements.
252.204-7021 Contractor Compliance with the Cybersecurity Maturity
Model Certification Level Requirement.

* * * * *

252.204-7019 Notice of NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment

Requirements.

As prescribed in 204.7304(d), use the following provision:

NOTICE OF NIST SP 800-171 DOD ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS (NOV 2020)

(a) Definitions.

Basic Assessment, Medium Assessment, and High Assessment have

the meaning given in the clause 252.204-7020, NIST SP 800-171 DoD

Assessments.

Covered contractor information system has the meaning given in

the clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

and Cyber Incident Reporting, of this solicitation.

(b) Requirement. In order to be considered for award, if the

Offeror is required to implement NIST SP 800-171, the Offeror shall

have a current assessment (i.e., not more than 3 years old unless a

lesser time is specified in the solicitation) (see 252.204-7020)

for each covered contractor information system that is relevant to

the offer, contract, task order, or delivery order. The Basic,

Medium, and High NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessments are described in

the NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology located at

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/cyber/strategically_assessing_cont

ractor_implementation_of_NIST_SP_800-171.html.

(c) Procedures. (1) The Offeror shall verify that summary

level scores of a current NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment (i.e., not

more than 3 years old unless a lesser time is specified in the

solicitation) are posted in the Supplier Performance Risk System

(SPRS) (https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/) for all covered contractor

information systems relevant to the offer.

(2) If the Offeror does not have summary level scores of a

current NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment (i.e., not more than 3 years

old unless a lesser time is specified in the solicitation) posted

in SPRS, the Offeror may conduct and submit a Basic Assessment to

[email protected] for posting to SPRS in the format identified in

paragraph (d) of this provision.

(d) Summary level scores. Summary level scores for all

assessments will be posted 30 days post-assessment in SPRS to

provide DoD Components visibility into the summary level scores of

strategic assessments.

(1) Basic Assessments. An Offeror may follow the procedures

in paragraph (c)(2) of this provision for posting Basic Assessments

to SPRS.

(i) The email shall include the following information:

(A) Cybersecurity standard assessed (e.g., NIST SP 800-

171 Rev 1).

(B) Organization conducting the assessment (e.g.,

Contractor self-assessment).

(C) For each system security plan (security requirement

3.12.4) supporting the performance of a DoD contract—

(1) All industry Commercial and Government Entity

(CAGE) code(s) associated with the information system(s) addressed

by the system security plan; and

(2) A brief description of the system security plan

architecture, if more than one plan exists.

(D) Date the assessment was completed.

(E) Summary level score (e.g., 95 out of 110, NOT the

individual value for each requirement).

(F) Date that all requirements are expected to be

implemented (i.e., a score of 110 is expected to be achieved) based

on information gathered from associated plan(s) of action developed

in accordance with NIST SP 800-171.

(ii) If multiple system security plans are addressed in

the email described at paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section, the

Offeror shall use the following format for the report:

CAGE
Brief Date
Codes
System description Date of Total score of
supported
Security Plan of the plan assessment Score 110 will
by this
architecture achieved
plan

(2) Medium and High Assessments. DoD will post the following

Medium and/or High Assessment summary level scores to SPRS for each

system assessed:

(i) The standard assessed (e.g., NIST SP 800-171 Rev 1).

(ii) Organization conducting the assessment, e.g., DCMA,

or a specific organization (identified by Department of Defense

Activity Address Code (DoDAAC)).

 (iii) All industry CAGE code(s) associated with the

information system(s) addressed by the system security plan.

(iv) A brief description of the system security plan

architecture, if more than one system security plan exists.

(v) Date and level of the assessment, i.e., medium or

high.

(vi) Summary level score (e.g., 105 out of 110, not the

individual value assigned for each requirement).

(vii) Date that all requirements are expected to be

implemented (i.e., a score of 110 is expected to be achieved) based

on information gathered from associated plan(s) of action developed

in accordance with NIST SP 800-171.

(3) Accessibility. (i) Assessment summary level scores

posted in SPRS are available to DoD personnel, and are protected,

in accordance with the standards set forth in DoD Instruction

5000.79, Defense-wide Sharing and Use of Supplier and Product

Performance Information (PI).

(ii) Authorized representatives of the Offeror for which

the assessment was conducted may access SPRS to view their own

summary level scores, in accordance with the SPRS Software User’s

Guide for Awardees/Contractors available at

https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.pdf.

(iii) A High NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment may result in

documentation in addition to that listed in this section. DoD will

retain and protect any such documentation as “Controlled

Unclassified Information (CUI)” and intended for internal DoD use

only. The information will be protected against unauthorized use

and release, including through the exercise of applicable

exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act (e.g., Exemption 4

covers trade secrets and commercial or financial information

obtained from a contractor that is privileged or confidential).

(End of provision)

252.204-7020 NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Requirements.

As prescribed in 204.7304(e), use the following clause:

NIST SP 800-171 DOD ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS (NOV 2020)

(a) Definitions.

Basic Assessment means a contractor’s self-assessment of the

contractor’s implementation of NIST SP 800-171 that—

(1) Is based on the Contractor’s review of their system

security plan(s) associated with covered contractor information

system(s);

(2) Is conducted in accordance with the NIST SP 800-171 DoD

Assessment Methodology; and

(3) Results in a confidence level of “Low” in the resulting

score, because it is a self-generated score.

Covered contractor information system has the meaning given in

the clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

and Cyber Incident Reporting, of this contract.

 High Assessment means an assessment that is conducted by

Government personnel using NIST SP 800-171A, Assessing Security

Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information that—

(1) Consists of—

(i) A review of a contractor’s Basic Assessment;

(ii) A thorough document review;

(iii) Verification, examination, and demonstration of a

Contractor’s system security plan to validate that NIST SP 800-171

security requirements have been implemented as described in the

contractor’s system security plan; and

(iv) Discussions with the contractor to obtain additional

information or clarification, as needed; and

(2) Results in a confidence level of “High” in the resulting

score.

Medium Assessment means an assessment conducted by the

Government that—

(1) Consists of—

(i) A review of a contractor’s Basic Assessment;

(ii) A thorough document review; and

(iii) Discussions with the contractor to obtain additional

information or clarification, as needed; and

(2) Results in a confidence level of “Medium” in the

resulting score.

(b) Applicability. This clause applies to covered contractor

information systems that are required to comply with the National

Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication

(SP) 800-171, in accordance with Defense Federal Acquisition

Regulation System (DFARS) clause at 252.204-7012, Safeguarding

Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting, of this

contract.

(c) Requirements. The Contractor shall provide access to its

facilities, systems, and personnel necessary for the Government to

conduct a Medium or High NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment, as

described in NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment Methodology at

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/cyber/strategically_assessing_cont

ractor_implementation_of_NIST_SP_800-171.html, if necessary.

(d) Procedures. Summary level scores for all assessments will

be posted in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS)

(https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/) to provide DoD Components

visibility into the summary level scores of strategic assessments.

(1) Basic Assessments. A contractor may submit, via

encrypted email, summary level scores of Basic Assessments

conducted in accordance with the NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment

Methodology to [email protected] for posting to SPRS.

(i) The email shall include the following information:

(A) Version of NIST SP 800-171 against which the

assessment was conducted.

(B) Organization conducting the assessment (e.g.,

Contractor self-assessment).

(C) For each system security plan (security requirement

3.12.4) supporting the performance of a DoD contract—

(1) All industry Commercial and Government Entity

(CAGE) code(s) associated with the information system(s) addressed

by the system security plan; and

(2) A brief description of the system security plan

architecture, if more than one plan exists.

(D) Date the assessment was completed.

(E) Summary level score (e.g., 95 out of 110, NOT the

individual value for each requirement).

(F) Date that all requirements are expected to be

implemented (i.e., a score of 110 is expected to be achieved) based

on information gathered from associated plan(s) of action developed

in accordance with NIST SP 800-171.

(ii) If multiple system security plans are addressed in

the email described at paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, the

Contractor shall use the following format for the report:

CAGE Brief Date

System
Codes description Date of Total score of
Security
supported of the plan assessment Score 110 will
Plan
by this architecture achieved
 plan

(2) Medium and High Assessments. DoD will post the following

Medium and/or High Assessment summary level scores to SPRS for each

system security plan assessed:

(i) The standard assessed (e.g., NIST SP 800-171 Rev 1).

(ii) Organization conducting the assessment, e.g., DCMA,

or a specific organization (identified by Department of Defense

Activity Address Code (DoDAAC)).

(iii) All industry CAGE code(s) associated with the

information system(s) addressed by the system security plan.

(iv) A brief description of the system security plan

architecture, if more than one system security plan exists.

(v) Date and level of the assessment, i.e., medium or

high.

(vi) Summary level score (e.g., 105 out of 110, not the

individual value assigned for each requirement).

(vii) Date that all requirements are expected to be

implemented (i.e., a score of 110 is expected to be achieved) based

on information gathered from associated plan(s) of action developed

in accordance with NIST SP 800-171.

 (e) Rebuttals. (1) DoD will provide Medium and High

Assessment summary level scores to the Contractor and offer the

opportunity for rebuttal and adjudication of assessment summary

level scores prior to posting the summary level scores to SPRS (see

SPRS User’s Guide

https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.pdf).

(2) Upon completion of each assessment, the contractor has 14

business days to provide additional information to demonstrate that

they meet any security requirements not observed by the assessment

team or to rebut the findings that may be of question.

(f) Accessibility. (1) Assessment summary level scores posted

in SPRS are available to DoD personnel, and are protected, in

accordance with the standards set forth in DoD Instruction 5000.79,

Defense-wide Sharing and Use of Supplier and Product Performance

Information (PI).

(2) Authorized representatives of the Contractor for which

the assessment was conducted may access SPRS to view their own

summary level scores, in accordance with the SPRS Software User’s

Guide for Awardees/Contractors available at

https://www.sprs.csd.disa.mil/pdf/SPRS_Awardee.pdf.

(3) A High NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment may result in

documentation in addition to that listed in this clause. DoD will

retain and protect any such documentation as “Controlled

Unclassified Information (CUI)” and intended for internal DoD use

only. The information will be protected against unauthorized use

and release, including through the exercise of applicable

exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act (e.g., Exemption 4

covers trade secrets and commercial or financial information

obtained from a contractor that is privileged or confidential).

(g) Subcontracts. (1) The Contractor shall insert the

substance of this clause, including this paragraph (g), in all

subcontracts and other contractual instruments, including

subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial items (excluding

COTS items).

(2) The Contractor shall not award a subcontract or other

contractual instrument, that is subject to the implementation of

NIST SP 800-171 security requirements, in accordance with DFARS

clause 252.204-7012 of this contract, unless the subcontractor has

completed, within the last 3 years, at least a Basic NIST SP 800-

171 DoD Assessment, as described in

https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/cyber/strategically_assessing_cont

ractor_implementation_of_NIST_SP_800-171.html, for all covered

contractor information systems relevant to its offer that are not

part of an information technology service or system operated on

behalf of the Government.

(3) If a subcontractor does not have summary level scores of

a current NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment (i.e., not more than 3

years old unless a lesser time is specified in the solicitation)

posted in SPRS, the subcontractor may conduct and submit a Basic

Assessment, in accordance with the NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment

Methodology, to [email protected] for posting to SPRS along with

the information required by paragraph (d) of this clause.

(End of clause)

252.204-7021 Contractor Compliance with the Cybersecurity Maturity

Model Certification Level Requirement.

As prescribed in 204.7503(a) and (b), insert the following

clause:

CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL

CERTIFICATION LEVEL REQUIREMENT (NOV 2020)

(a) Scope. The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification

(CMMC) CMMC is a framework that measures a contractor’s

cybersecurity maturity to include the implementation of

cybersecurity practices and institutionalization of processes (see

https://www.acq.osd.mil/cmmc/index.html).

(b) Requirements. The Contractor shall have a current (i.e.

not older than 3 years) CMMC certificate at the CMMC level required

by this contract and maintain the CMMC certificate at the required

level for the duration of the contract.

(c) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall—

(1) Insert the substance of this clause, including this

paragraph (c), in all subcontracts and other contractual

instruments, including subcontracts for the acquisition of

commercial items, excluding commercially available off-the-shelf

items; and

(2) Prior to awarding to a subcontractor, ensure that the

subcontractor has a current (i.e., not older than 3 years) CMMC

certificate at the CMMC level that is appropriate for the

information that is being flowed down to the subcontractor.

(End of clause)

[FR Doc. 2020-21123 Filed: 9/28/2020 8:45 am; Publication Date: 9/29/2020]