An Introduction to Redox Polymers for Energy-Storage Applications Ulrich S. Schubert 2024 scribd download
An Introduction to Redox Polymers for Energy-Storage Applications Ulrich S. Schubert 2024 scribd download
https://ebookmass.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/an-introduction-to-
redox-polymers-for-energy-storage-applications-
ulrich-s-schubert/
https://ebookmass.com/product/thermal-energy-storage-from-
fundamentals-to-applications-alexandra-soh/
testbankdeal.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/nanowire-energy-storage-devices-
synthesis-characterization-and-applications-liqiang-mai/
testbankdeal.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/energy-storage-for-modern-power-system-
operations-sandeep-dhundhara/
testbankdeal.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/transition-metal-oxides-for-
electrochemical-energy-storage-jagjit-nanda/
testbankdeal.com
An Introduction to Policing 9th Edition John S. Dempsey
https://ebookmass.com/product/an-introduction-to-policing-9th-edition-
john-s-dempsey/
testbankdeal.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/energy-storage-systems-system-design-
and-storage-technologies-armin-u-schmiegel/
testbankdeal.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/polymers-for-vibration-damping-
applications-b-c-chakraborty/
testbankdeal.com
https://ebookmass.com/product/an-introduction-to-parallel-programming-
second-edition-peter-s-pacheco/
testbankdeal.com
Contents
List of Abbreviations xi
2 Polymer-Containing Batteries 17
Study Goals 17
2.1 Introduction 17
2.2 Working Principles 21
2.3 Characterization of Energy-Storage Devices 23
2.3.1 Performance Parameters 23
2.3.2 Charging/Discharging Characteristics 25
2.4 Battery Housing 27
2.5 Solid-State Batteries Incorporating Polymers, as Active Materials 30
2.5.1 Working Principle 31
2.5.2 Material Requirements 33
2.6 Capacitors Incorporating Polymers, as Active Materials 37
2.6.1 Historic Development and Working Principle 37
2.6.2 Material Requirements 41
2.7 Redox-Flow Batteries Incorporating Polymers as Active Materials 44
2.7.1 Working Principle 46
2.7.2 Materials Requirements 47
2.7.3 Aqueous pRFBs 50
2.7.4 Organic pRFBs 51
2.7.5 Suspension RFBs 53
2.8 Concluding Remarks 58
References 59
vi Contents
Index 521
Visit https://ebookmass.com
now to explore a rich
collection of eBooks and enjoy
exciting offers!
xi
List of Abbreviations
1,2‐benzenedithiolate
BHJ bulk heterojunction
BODIPY boron‐dipyrromethene (i.e.
4,4‐difluoro‐4‐bora‐3a,4a‐diaza‐s‐indacene)
BOP benzoxazine polymer
BTMAPV 1,1‐bis‐[3‐(trimethylammonium)propyl]‐4,4‐bipyridinium
tetrachloride
cyclovoltammetry
energy efficiency
xii List of Abbreviations
polyacetylene
PAMAM polyamidoamine
PAN polyacrylonitrile
PAni polyaniline
List of Abbreviations xiii
polystyrene
refractive index
ROMP ring‐opening metathesis polymerization
xiv List of Abbreviations
voltage efficiency
WIS water‐in‐salt
XPS X‐ray photoelectron spectra
ZIB zinc‐ion battery
1
Study Goals
● Knowledge of the history and development of energy‐storage devices
● Knowledge of important redox polymers from the different eras
In recent years, the market for stationary energy‐storage systems has experienced a
tremendous growth – a trend that is expected to continue almost undamped in the
future (Figure 1.1) [1]. Moreover, the society calls for efficient, durable batteries to
satisfy their specific wishes: electric vehicles, laptops, cell phones, wearable/
portable gadgets, Internet of things (IoT), etc. [2]. To fulfill these as well as projected
needs, worldwide research is focused on the improvement and development of
tailor‐made, energy‐storage systems. In this respect, the implementation of new
redox‐active materials represents one approach, and inter‐alia redox polymers have
gained significant attention in recent years [3–7]. Before introducing these materi-
als, the long history of energy‐storage devices will be briefly summarized.
In 1936, numerous items – a ceramic pot, a tube of copper, and a rod of iron – were
found in Khujut Rabu, Iraq. These artifacts have been assigned to the Parthian (150
BC–223 AD) or Sasanian era (224–650 AD). Though their actual meaning still
remains unclear, it has been speculated that they were used as an “energy‐storage
device” (a potential of c. 0.8 V was calculated) [8]. Far later, the term “battery” was
coined by Benjamin Franklin, who in 1748 compared multiple, simultaneously act-
ing “Leyden jars” to an artillery battery [9]. The first electrochemical cell, the
so‐called ”voltaic pile,” was constructed by Alessandro Volta in 1800 [10]. In
subsequent years, various alternatives of this original device have been created.
From these, the Daniell cell (initially reported in 1836) represents the first practical
*Parts of this chapter are taken from a review article published elsewhere: P. Rohland,
E. Schröter, O. Nolte, G. R. Newkome, M. D. Hager, U. S. Schubert, Prog. Polym. Sci.
2022, 125, article ID 101474. Reproduced with kind permission; © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
60
Redox-flow
Lithium-ion (second life)
50 Lithium-ion
Hybrid
Sodium–sulfur
Cumulated number of projects
40 Lead–acid
30
20
10
0
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
and durable power source, which even became an industry standard and was
employed by the early British electrical telegraph networks [11]. All these batteries
were “wet cells,” which were constructed from glassware and contained liquid elec-
trolytes; however, in many cases, their fragile and dangerous nature prevented any
portable applications, and they were superseded by the portable, hence more con-
venient dry‐cell batteries. In this respect, the Leclanché cell and Gassner’s zinc–
carbon cell – the first real “dry cell” batteries – have to be explicitly named; these dry
cells offered potentials of 1.4 and 1.5 V, respectively [12]. The latter, patented in
Germany in 1886, comprised a MnO2 cathode, which was dipped into the NH4Cl/
ZnCl2 electrolyte paste; the surrounding Zn shell acted as the anode [13].
Along these primary batteries, the secondary batteries, i.e. rechargeable batteries,
were also disclosed in the second half of the nineteenth century. Credit must be given
to Gaston Planté, who in 1859 invented the lead–acid battery, which could be
recharged by applying an appropriate reverse current. This device can certainly be
considered, so far, the most successful secondary battery [14]. Similarly, the first
alkaline battery, the Ni–Cd cell, was invented in 1899 [15]. This cell, which then
entered the market in 1910, offered a much higher energy density to that of the lead–
acid battery but was by far more expensive. Research in the last century culminated
in the development of the secondary lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) [16, 17]. Though
1.2 Redox dolyRers Sdert VRew do SRVe dong Vrrtdel 3
initially studied by Lewis in 1912, LIBs were brought to market in the 1970s, and,
today, LIBs represent the leading technology in the field of secondary batteries. The
outstanding contributions in LIB research by J.B. Goodenough, M.S. Whittingham,
and A. Yoshino were honored with the Chemistry Nobel Prize in 2019 [18]. Though
LIBs feature distinguished benefits (e.g. low costs, high voltages, increased power
densities), some serious downside aspects have to be noted. Firstly, LIBs are nonelas-
tic and mechanically treated, leading to possible leakage and thus serious haz-
ards [19]. Secondly, cobalt raw materials are required for the LIB fabrication. These
materials are often mined under unsustainable mining conditions, which involve
slavery and/or children labor work [20, 21]. Policies against these unacceptable min-
ing conditions led to a significant increase in the world market prices for cobalt,
which has recently led to overproduction stagnation [22]. Finally, large battery packs
need reliable temperature‐control systems to guarantee safe conditions and to pre-
vent serious hazards, e.g. fires or explosions [23, 24]. These aspects limit the applica-
bility of LIBs, in particular with respect to small and flexible devices (e.g. smart
clothing, and packaging) or other demanding applications, such as grid stabilization
and on‐site storage [4].
Regarding their applications, redox polymers that are derived from organic raw
materials represent one promising alternative approach [3–7]. For example, organic
polymers allow the fabrication of flexible devices, and their use is almost independ-
ent from the fluctuating commodity prices of rare metals. Moreover, polymers can
be synthesized in a wide range of structures and topologies, thus facilitating the
preparation of tailor‐made materials. Today, the field of redox‐active polymers is a
result of eight decades of research, which will be briefly summed up next.
In 1920, Herman Staudinger published his famous article, in which polymers were
defined as “long chains of high molecular weight, which are comprised of cova-
lently linked repeating subunits, the self‐styled monomers” [25]. Though his pro-
posal met heavy opposition at the time, this perception represents the initial spark
that ignited modern polymer science. His fundamental research on macromolecules
and persistence was honored in 1953, when he received the Nobel Prize in
Chemistry [26, 27]. Carothers, a pioneer in the field of synthetic polyesters and poly-
amides, suggested the first classification scheme for synthetic macromolecules, tak-
ing into account the monomer subunit as well as the applied polymerization
technique [28]. This about 90‐year‐old material classification remains contempo-
rary and is still commonly used to rationalize the differences between macromole-
cules synthesized via different polymerization methods (e.g. step‐growth vs.
chain‐growth polymerization). The field of polymer chemistry has experienced a
tremendous evolution, and a range of reliable controlled/living polymerization
techniques (i.e. metathesis, ionic, and radical) has become available, thus enabling
4 1 The Emergence of “Redox Polymers” in the Field of Energy-Storage Applications
H
N
n N n n
H
n
n
S n
Figure 1.2 Schematic representation of the most relevant parent conjugated polymers
along with their years of discovery. Source: [55], figure 1 (p.1413)/John Wiley & Sons.
the controlled and precise synthesis of polymers of various topologies (i.e. linear,
star‐shaped, and branched). However, Carothers’ fundamental systematics are gen-
erally obeyed in all of these cases.
Concurrent with the fast development in synthesis and characterization, the
focus of polymer research has moved away from the traditional areas of interest
(e.g. tire technology or packaging materials) toward targets, which address the spe-
cial needs of today’s society [29]. Hence, tailor‐made polymers with sophisticated
properties can be offered for a broad range of applications, which have relevance for
today’s daily life style. The long list of potential applications includes photovolta-
ics [30–32], light‐emitting devices [33, 34], electrochromic devices [35], smart coat-
ings [36, 37], self‐healing materials [38, 39], shape‐memory materials [40, 41],
bioimaging [42], carriers in drug/gene delivery [43–48], biodegradable packages
[49, 50], and, last but not least, energy storage [3, 4, 51–53].
In 2000, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to H. Shirakawa,
A.G. MacDiarmid, and A.J. Heeger “for the discovery and development of electri-
cally conductive polymers” [18]. Though it is commonly believed that these authors’
collaborative research on polyacetylene (PA) represents the origin of conductive
polymers, their history can actually be traced back to the middle of the nineteenth
century [54]. The first, fully synthetic polymer, polyaniline (PAni), was already
reported by F.F. Runge in 1834 [54–56]. Although pyrrole was discovered in
1834 [56], its oxidative polymerization to afford polypyrrole (PPy), as another type
of conjugated polymer, was noticed by Angeli in 1915 [57]. The parent structures of
the most relevant conductive polymers, along with their years of discovery, are
shown in Figure 1.2. In general, their conductivity results from the (reversible) oxi-
dation or reduction of the parent π‐conjugated polymer.
early days of ion‐exchange polymers, thus defining the first era of redox‐active poly-
mers (Figure 1.3). Cassidy proposed that polymers – in analogy to the proton‐
exchange capacity of acidic polymers – should also be able to exchange electrons, as
another “fundamental particle” [58]. Due to the chaos of the World War II era, this
conception was realized independently by H. Lauth and H.G. Cassidy. Thus, in
1944, Lauth filed a patent for poly(resorcin‐trihydroxybenzene‐formaldehyde)
redox polymers, as water deoxygenation agents [59], whereas Cassidy studied the
applicability of poly(vinyl quinone) (PVQ), as electron‐exchange polymers [60]. In
subsequent work, Cassidy et al. prepared a wide range of PVQ‐type polymers and
studied their properties as well as applicability [61–64]. The following years faced a
scientific dualism between the Cassidy and Manecke groups [65], the latter first
published a study in 1953 on “electron‐exchange polymers” [66]. These authors
mainly focused on polymers, which were equipped with 1,4‐/1,2‐benzoquinone
[67–83] or 9,10‐anthraquinone moieties [84]. These early contributions were sum-
marized by Cassidy in his seminal textbook on “oxidation–reduction polymers” [58]
as well as in numerous review articles [85]. Noteworthy, a range of other redox‐
active polymers was also investigated in this timeframe; these species however
remained virtually marginal. During the first era of redox‐active polymers, some
prominent redox‐active materials, which are commonly used nowadays, were ini-
tially published: polymers containing methylene blue [86], thiol [87], ferrocene [88,
89], indigo [90], and pyridinium or quinolinium moieties [91]. Moreover, Harwood
and Cassidy reported polypeptides, which incorporated 2,5‐dihydroxyphenylalanine
or 3,4‐dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA), as redox‐active sites [92]. One further nota-
ble milestone is the synthesis of the first stable, polymer‐bound free N‐radicals.
Henglein and Boysen prepared such a polymer by γ‐irradiation of a precursor poly-
mer [93]; more conveniently, Braun et al. obtained similar polymers by oxidizing the
precursor polymer with PbO2 or Ag2O2 in solution [94]. In the same context, the first
report of poly(TEMPO methacrylate) (PTMA), as a nitroxide‐containing polymer, is
worth mentioning (TEMPO: 2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐piperidinyloxy‐4‐yl) [95]. Today,
this polymer represents one of most used active materials in organic radical batter-
ies (ORBs) [3, 53, 96].
In summary, the time was not ready for a significant technological breakthrough
during the first era of redox‐active polymers. These materials attracted only interest
from a scientific point of view and their use was devoted mainly in water deoxy-
genation and H2O2 production [59, 97–101]. The first battery, which contained a
redox‐active polymer as an electrolyte, was invented in 1958 [102]; a few years later,
the first secondary LIB using a redox polymer, as cathode, was demonstrated [103].
However, these inventions did not promote the technological breakthrough of redox
polymers and were only on the scientific fringes for many years.
“electron 1957 n
n
OH n
HO OH
n
OH exchanger” DOPA O2N
N
•
NO2
O O
S
n
O O
N
H
N
N
OH N n •
• O
O
1944 1962
1862 Lauth 1955 First polymeric 1967 1979–1980 2003–2004
PANI First redox polymer Thiols radical PTMA PANI, PTh, PPy Radical ploymer batteries
Figure 1.3 Timeline with the most noteworthy inventions and scientific milestones in the field of redox-active polymers [4]. Source: Figure
reproduced with kind permission; © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
1.2 Redox dolyRers Sdert VRew do SRVe dong Vrrtdel 7