0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

Chapter 8 Full Factorial.

Uploaded by

Chao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views

Chapter 8 Full Factorial.

Uploaded by

Chao
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 44

School of Engineering

Numerical Methods an d Data Analysis

Lecture 3 - Full Factorial


1 The Full Factorial Design

2 23 Factorial Design

Table of
Contents 3 2 4 Factorial Design

3 O t h er 2k Design
Full Factorial Design

The 2 k Fact orial Design


• 2 k is p artic ularly useful in the early stages o f experimental
work

• Too many fac tors a n d interactions t o investigate

• Special (short-cut) me t ho d s fo r analysis

• a.k.a Factor Screening Experiments.


Full Factorial Design

The 2 k Fact orial Design


• Special case o f t h e gene ral fa c t o ria l design; k factors, all
a t two levels

• The two levels are usually called low a n d h i g h

• Because 2 factors, all response is approximat ely linear over


the ran ge o f the f a c t o r level chosen.

• When we are s t a rtin g t o stu dy a process/system, usually


this is o u r first assumption: Linearism o f the two factors

• They c o u l d b e either:
– Q u a n t i t a t i v e (2 values o f time, temp, pressure etc)
– Qu a lit at iv e (2 machines, two operators, t wo batches)

• Very widely u sed in in du s t ria l ex p e rime n ta tio n


Full Factorial Design

The 2 2 Fact orial Design


• Yate’s Order, b y Dr. Frank Yates
• Arrange as O r t h o g o n a l Constant
• The ‘+’ a n d ‘-’ signs show ‘high’ a n d ‘low’
• The h ig h a n d low shows the ‘level’ o f th e experiment
• The word ‘orthogonal’ presumes t h a t we c alc ulated th e m by
m a t c h i n g the hig h a n d lows o f all possible f ac to r
co mb in a tio n
Full Factorial Design

S t a n d a r d o r d e r (Yate’s Order)

• (1): Treatment mod el (the whole experiment model)


• a : tre a t me nt f o r f a c t o r A
• b : tre a t me nt f o r f a c t o r B
• ab : t re at me n t fo r intera ctio n ab
• I : Mo de l effect
• A : F actor A effect
• B : F ac tor B effect
• AB : in tera ction AB effect
Full Factorial Design

O r t h o g o n a l Co ntr ast
• Is basically tak in g the Factorial effect combinatio ns

(+)

(0) (0) (0)


2 4 Factorial Design

O r t h o g o n a l Co ntr ast
2 k Factorial Design

2 2 - O r t h o g o n a l C o n t ra s t
2 k Factorial Design

2 3 - O r t h o g o n a l C o n t ra s t
Concept

Concept
• In a f ac t orial experiment, all
possible c o mb in at i o ns of
f a c t o r levels are tested
• Varied t og et he r 2 n factorial
design
• 22 = 2 levels 2 f a ct o rs = 4 p o in t s = 4
runs
• Two factors: O -R, two level: B-T
• Randomisation - Replication
Concept

Concept
B (-,+) Ab (+,+)

(1) (-,-) A (+,-)


Full Factorial Design

Analysis Procedure f o r Full Factorial

1. Estimate f a c t o r design
2. Form initial model
3. Perform statistical testing
4. Analyse results
5. Interpret results
Full Factorial Design

The 2 2 Fact orial Design

A = r e ac t a n t concentration, B = catalys t amount, y = (observation) recovery


Investigating the effect of the c o nc en tra tio n of re a c t a n t a n d a m o u n t o f catalyst.
To fi nd the best c o m b i n a t i o n of fa ct ors t o maximize yield.

A is f a c t o r A, B is f a c t o r B a n d AB is f a c t o r AB
+ = Hi gh levels of A a n d B Level of A = 15% a n d 25%
- = Low levels o f A a n d B Level o f B = 1 p o u n d a n d 2 p o u n d s
How d oe s this ‘high’
a n d ‘low’ look like?
Full Factorial Design

1) The simplest FF case : 22 - t o f in d


m a in f a c t o r
• “-” a n d “+” d e no t e the low
a n d h ig h levels of a factor,
respectively
• Low a n d h ig h are a rb it rary
terms – doesn’t m e a n ‘low’ o r
‘high’ values b u t ‘positions’
• a is A a t h ig h a n d B a t low
• b is A a t low a n d B a t High
• a b is A a n d B b o t h high:
interaction
• (1) is A a n d B b o t h low
• Factors c a n b e qu antitative
o r qualitative, a l t ho u g h
their t r e a t me n t in the final
mo d el will b e different
Full Factorial Design

1) The simplest FF case : 22 - t o f in d


m a in f a c t o r
Full Factorial Design

2) Initial Model: Effect Estimates for


FF 22

• Effect Estimates shows the positive and


negative modes of the factor and interaction.

• Positive means increasing outcome while


negative means decreasing outcomes.
Full Factorial Design

2) Initial Model: Sum of Squares for


FF 22

• Sum o f squares c a n be calculated t o study the


residual c o n t r ib u t i o n towards the experiment.

• Usually f or simple 22, the O r t h o g o n a l Cont ras t is


e n o u g h t o justify the M a i n Effects of the
experiment
Full Factorial Design

3) Analyse Results

(1) (1)
a a
b b
ab ab
Full Factorial Design

4) a n d 5) Analyse a n d Interpret
Results
• The effect of A is +ve: concentration will
increase the yield (MAIN FACTOR)
• The effect of B is –ve: 15% a n d 20% will
decrease the yield
• Interaction a p p e a rs t o be small in this case
relative t o two effects
FACTORS AND EFFECT SUM OF %
INTERACTIONS ESTIMATES SQUARES CONTRIBUTION
A 8.33 208 71.4%
B -5.00 75 25.7%
AB 1.67 8.33 0.03%
291.33
Full Factorial Design

2 k FF
• In ma ny experiments involving 2 k design, we
are interested in t h e m a g n i t u d e a n d
direc tion o f t h e f ac tors effect

• OR in o t h e r words, which variables likely t o


b e imp ortant.
1 The Full Factorial Design

2 23 Factorial Design

Table of
Contents 3 2 4 Factorial Design

3 O t h er 2k Design
23 Factorial Design

23
• Suppose there are three f acto rs A, B a n d C o f interest.
• The eight tr eatment s c a n b e a r r a n g e d as below.
• The Right is of ten call Yate’s o rd e r th e Left is called Geometric
Notation.
• They are all just m e t h o d t o achieve O r t h o g o n a l Cont ras t t o be
Zero.
• Like previously if all balanc e o u t as Zero, t h a t means Hypothesis
Null are assumed t o b e acc ep ted
23 Factorial Design

23
23 Factorial Design

23 - Estimate F a ct o r Design a n d Initial


M o de l

• The development of estimates in 23 f ac torial


• 1st consider A:
– Effect of A when B a n d C is low level is [ a – (1)]/n.
– Effect of A when B is high a n d C is low is [ ab – b ]/ n .
– Effect o f A when B is low a n d C is high is [ ac – c ]/ n
– Effect of A when B is high a n d C is high is [ abc – bc ]/ n

• O r using contrast, same results


23 Factorial Design

23 - Estimate F a ct o r Design a n d Initial


M o de l

Analysis d o n e via
c om p u t er
…technically
23 Factorial Design

23 - Estimate F a ct o r Design a n d Initial


M o de l

Calculate these O r t h o g o n a l Contrast


Run these c onf igurat ions
23 Factorial Design

2 3 - Statistical Testing
23
● F o r e s t i m a t e s : [….]/4n
● F o r s u m s q : [….]2/8n
23 Factorial Design

Example 1
A 23 fa cto rial design was used t o develop a nitrid e e tch process o n a single-wafer p la sm a etching
tool. Plasma e tching is a f o r m o f p la sm a processing used t o f a b r i c a te inte gra te d circuits. It involves
a h igh -speed stream o f glow d ischarge (plasma) o f a n a p p r o p r i a t e gas mixture be ing sh ot (in pulses)
a t a sample. The design f a c t o r are th e g a p between th e electrodes, th e Hexafluoroethane gas flow
a n d t he Radio Frequency (RF) power a p p l i ed t o th e cathode. Each r u n a t two levels a n d replicated
twice. The response variable is th e e tch ra te f o r silicone nitride. The d a t a a re shown below

Initial model A = gap, B = Flow of Hexafluoroethane, C = Power, y = Etch Rate


Further info: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfZfqMDERQM
23 Factorial Design

23 - Initial M o d e l (DON’T DRAW THIS IN


FINAL EXAM)

Cube plots are often


useful visual displays
o f experimental
results.

N o t t o b e repr oduc e
in exam!
23 Factorial Design

23 - Calc ulation

23
● F o r e s t i m a t e s : [….]/4n
● F o r s u m s q : [….]2/8n
23 Factorial Design

23 - Effect Estimates, Statistical Analysis


a n d I nt e rpret ati on

• ‘Percent contribution’ shows the percentage c o n t r i b u t i o n o f eac h model


t o the t o t a l sum o f squares
• Rough g ui de TO STUDY RESIDUAL a n d effects c on trib ut ion
• Effective t o see the relative imp orta nc e of each model term
• Here we know f a c t o r C is the mai n effect of the whole experiment a n d
any in te rac ti on of the least a n d most.
23 Factorial Design

23 - Effect Estimates, Statistical Analysis


a n d I n t er pr e t at i o n

• The full s ummary proves o u r estimates


• Power is the ma in effect o f this experiments
A = gap,
• The significants are A, C a n d AC B = Flow o f Hexafluoroethane,
• The a c c e p t an c e are B, AB, BC a n d ABC
C = Power
• Int eraction ABC doesn’t n o t exist
1 The Full Factorial Design

2 23 Factorial Design

Table of
Contents 3 2 4 Factorial Design

3 O t h er 2k Design
2 4 Factorial Design

2 4
2 4 Factorial Design

23 – O r t h o g o n a l Cont rast
2 4 Factorial Design

2 4 – O r t h o g o n a l Cont ras t
2 4 Factorial Design

2 4 – Effect Estimates a n d Sum o f


Squares

● For estimates: [….]/8n


● For sumsq: [….]2/16n
2 4 Factorial Design

2 4 – Example
• Example 6.2 (A single replicate of the 2 4 design)
– A 2 4 fac torial was used t o investigate the effects of
f o u r fac tors o n the filtration ra te o f a resin
– The facto rs are A = temperature, B = pressure, C =
co n c e nt ra tio n of formaldehyde, D= stirring rate
2 4 Factorial Design

2 4 – Example (After calc ulations &


general answers)

• B is n o t significant a n d
all interac tions involving
B are negligible
• A is the highest c o n t r i b u t o r
• Small possibility o f
interaction
• Interaction between AC is
the highest a m o n g them
– A = temperature,

– B = pressure,

– C = concentrati on of
form aldehyde,

– D= s t i r r i n g r a t e
2 4 Factorial Design

2 4 – Example (ANOVA Table -


for comparison )

Response: Filtration Rate


ANOVA for Selected Factorial Model
Analysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares]
Sum of Mean F
Source Squares DF Square Value Prob >F
Model 5535.81 5 1107.16 56.74 < 0.0001
A 1870.56 1 1870.56 95.86 < 0.0001
C 390.06 1 390.06 19.99 0.0012
D 855.56 1 855.56 43.85 < 0.0001
AC 1314.06 1 1314.06 67.34 < 0.0001
AD 1105.56 1 1105.56 56.66 < 0.0001
Residual 195.12 10 19.51
Cor Total 5730.94 15

Std. Dev. 4.42 R-Squared 0.9660


Mean 70.06 Adj R-Squared 0.9489
C.V. 6.30 Pred R-Squared 0.9128
PRESS 499.52 Adeq Precision 20.841
2 4 Factorial Design

Summary of 2 k
Ef f ec t E s tim at es a n d Sum o f Sq u a r es

Summary of 2 2
● For estimates: [….]/2n
● For sumsq: [….]2/4n
Summary of 2 3
● For estimates: [….]/4n
● For sumsq: [….]2/8n
Summary of 2 4
● For estimates: [….]/8n
● For sumsq: [….]2/16n
1 The Full Factorial Design

2 23 Factorial Design

Table of
Contents 3 2 4 Factorial Design

3 O t h er 2k Design

You might also like