Lecture 3_Property Rights, and Externatilities
Lecture 3_Property Rights, and Externatilities
Ecosystem Services
• Exclusion: The right to determine who has access and who can be
excluded from using the property. Ostrom (1997) uses the term
proprietor to refer to those who hold access, withdrawal, management,
and exclusion rights.
• Alienation: The right to sell or lease. “Owners” possess all the rights of
proprietors along with the right of alienation. Private property falls
under this category, though owners can also be governments or
communities.
Property Rights
• An important step in protecting the environment is assigning appropriate
property rights.
Since those who receive positive externalities do not pay for them,
market demand does not include external benefits.
The sum of private benefit and external benefit is called social benefit
For instance, nearby residents and visitors enjoy the scenic of
natural forests, wildlife, and watershed benefits but do not have
to pay for them when buyers in a market purchase goods, the
market demand for the good reflects only the private benefits
that flow to the buyers. The scenic of natural forests, wildlife,
and watershed benefits is a positive externalities or external
benefits.
What are some possible interventions that could help secure the socially
optimal quantity of forestland in a market process?
Solution:
One common government intervention is to provide subsidies to those
who provide society with positive externalities
intervened in the market by using tax revenues to subsidize buyers, then
market demand would reflect social benefits
Negative Externalities
Negative externalities are defined as an uncompensated harm
to others in society that is generated as a by-product of
production and exchange.
Consumers will pay a subsidized price and so will consume too much.
Negative Externalities
Competitive markets are inefficient when there are negative
externalities
PS in Figure indicates
the corresponding
equilibrium price
when there are
unresolved negative
externalities.
This difference in output is denoted by the letter A in figure and reflects excess
production that occurs in competitive markets where firms are allowed to freely
emit negative externalities.
Negative Externalities
When firms can freely pollute they will supply along the private-cost supply
curve, leading to an equilibrium quantity of the good or service being
produced and sold that is larger than when firms are made to supply along
the social-cost supply curve.
When firms can freely pollute and supply along the private-cost supply curve,
the equilibrium market price PP only reflects marginal private cost, whereas
when negative externalities are internalized the equilibrium market price PS
reflects the full marginal social cost of production.
The buyers and the sellers receive a gross gain from trade equal to the large
triangle abc . The portion of this triangle above the dashed price line is a
simplified approximation for consumer surplus, while the portion below the
price line is producer surplus.
The parallelogram bcde in figure gives us the total dollar figure for the harms
to human health and the environment caused by negative externalities.
After accounting for total external costs, the true net gains from trade to all
members of society when firms freely pollute is area abc minus area bcde.
Negative Externalities
Suppose that firms are forced by regulatory intervention or market
reputation to internalize their external costs and supply along the
social-cost supply curve. one way to internalize negative externalities is
by way of a Pigouvian tax equal to marginal external cost.
Since firms have paid the tax to society they have (at least in theory)
compensated society for their pollution, and thus have internalized the
external costs. The total gains from trade when firms fully internalize
their external costs are given by the triangle afd.
Output set where the social- cost supply curve crosses the demand
curve is the efficient level of output.
Negative Externalities
Area afd, the gains from trade when negative externalities are fully
internalized and firms supply along the social-cost supply curve, is larger
than area [(abc)–(bcde)], the true gains from trade to all members of
society when firms freely pollute.
Internalizing externalities
improves the welfare of
society.
The difference between
area afd and area [(abe)–
(bcde)] is the little
triangle bfe, known in
microeconomic theory as
deadweight social loss,
and it represents the
resource allocation
inefficiency caused by
negative externalities.
Negative Externalities
Policy interventions such as environmental tax, pigouvian tax to
capture externalities and to ‘internalize’ the negative externalities
through environmental tax:
Marginal external cost should have to be known precisely
The political system should produce an efficient environmental
policy
The capacity to monitor emissions, charge appropriate tax, and
enforce this system