integration_ron
integration_ron
June 4, 2003
SYSTEM INTEGRATION
Overall Objective
The objective this Research Opportunity Notice (RON) is to solicit R&D proposals for developing
enabling technologies for integrating utility business and engineering information systems in
support of dynamic tariffs and demand response (DR). Proposed R&D may address part or all of
the technologies and/or any related technologies which further the goals described in this RON.
R&D projects should focus on developing enabling technologies for system integration as
opposed to commercial product development.
Specific Goals
The proposed R&D projects for system integration technologies in support of DR should also
support the following goals:
Traditionally, information systems have been isolated within each utility department. Historically
the various departments developed the systems with the intent that the system hardware and
information databases are the best to support the department's functions. Systems were
incompatible because:
This historical legacy also created islands of information within the utility. Consider an example of
the power transformer data from the perspective of several utility departments.
• Planning Department. In order to plan for a new transformer, the planning department
will need data from the inventory database (will the new transformer come from the utility
warehouse?), the purchasing and test and measurement database (what are the tested
impedance?), the operations database (real loads, generation dispatches), the
construction database (when and what is installed), etc. Once the data is collected, the
planning department keeps the data in the planning department database.
• Design Department. To create the initial design and budget for a substation, the design
department will need data from the purchasing database (prior costs), the manufacturer’s
Computer Aided Design (CAD) files (equipment layout), control and protection
department data (prior performance), etc. Once the data is collected, the design
department keeps the data in the design department database.
• Maintenance Department. While the transformer is in service, the maintenance
department needs Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data to locate the transformer,
1
Demand Response Enabling Technology Development Project
June 4, 2003
maintenance data, test and measurement data, operations data, and purchasing and
inventory data.
• Operations Department. The operations department needs present and anticipated
loading data, planned switching or maintenance activity of the transformer, and
transformer rating data.
As this illustration shows, there’s a multitude of databases and departmental data requests for
just one single piece of equipment. Imagine the level of complexity when this scenario is
expanded to cover the entire utility’s business.
Aware of the above drawbacks, utilities, through the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) and
other standards committees, have started several projects. These include:
2
Demand Response Enabling Technology Development Project
June 4, 2003
messages. IEC TC57 WG13 and WG14 are also working on UIB. (Integration Bus is
sometimes also called Message Bus)
• Integrated Energy and Communications Systems Architecture (IECSA)
EPRI and the Electricity Innovation Institute (E2I) formed the Consortium for Electric
Infrastructure to Support a Digital Society (CEIDS). The goal of the CEIDS IECSA
Project is to develop an open, standards-based architecture for the data communications
and distributed computing infrastructure that will enable the integration of a wide variety
of intelligent electric power system components.
The purpose of this RON is to solicit proposals for R&D tasks to develop enabling technologies
that will improve the integration of utility information systems. A main goal of funded R&D under
this RON is to create enabling technology that will lead to an order-of-magnitude (10 times)
increase in functionality while reducing total installed costs to one tenth (1/10th) of equivalent
technology used at the present time.
3
Demand Response Enabling Technology Development Project
June 4, 2003
In California, before the electricity industry restructuring, there were three major Investor-Owned
Utilities (IOU), Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE), and San
Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E). These utilities were traditional vertically integrated regulated
monopolies in their operating regions. The utilities owned and operated all components of the
electricity market; from power generation, to transmission, to distribution, to the meter located at
the electricity end-user’s premise.
After the electricity industry restructuring, the utilities divested their ownership of the generation
plants, but retained ownership of the transmission and distribution systems. Although in most
part, the utilities owned the transmission system, operation and maintenance were coordinated by
the non-profit entity, the California Independent System Operator (CAISO). The CAISO acts as
an electronic auction house, coordinating the sale of electricity between buyers and sellers. The
CAISO maintains the balance of the transmission system, matching supply and demand.
PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E became Utility Distribution Companies (UDC), owning and operating
the distribution systems that provide electricity to the retail customers. The distribution system
consists of breakers, conductors, transformers, fuses, capacitors, switches, monitoring and
control systems, communication systems, above and underground structure assets. UDC’s also
own meters and provide meter reading service. However, this asset and service can be provided
by third parties other than the UDC’s.
Traditionally, meter reading is performed by a human walking up to the meter and manually
reading the meter. The meter register value is entered and stored into a handheld device. At the
end of the day, all the meter register values read are uploaded from the handheld device to the
utility’s Customer Information System (CIS). The CIS uses the meter register values to generate
the monthly bills. A step up from the human meter reader are Automatic Meter Reading (AMR)
systems. One type of AMR system is a drive-by system. In a drive-by system, a van drives along
the meter reading route and uses a wireless transmitter to query the electronic meters. Upon
being queried, the meters transmit the meter register values to a wireless receiver on the van.
The meter register values are uploaded to the CIS when the van returns to the utility. Other AMR
systems utilize telephones, 2-way pagers, cellular phone systems, or fixed wireless systems to
transmit meter register values back to the utility. In most cases, the AMR data residing on the
CIS database(s) are not utilized by any other business systems within the utility. There’s little or
no integration among the various utility business systems.
Now consider an AMR system deployed for the purpose of DR with all utility business systems
fully integrated. With up-to-date information available system wide, an intelligent agent for
automatic outage detection and repair crew dispatch can be envisioned.
The agent will use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to detect outages based on the real-time information
from the Advanced Metering (AMR) and Distribution Automation (DA) Supervisory Control and
Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems. Once an outage is detected, the agent will retrieve
associated information from the CIS and the Automated Mapping/Facilities Management and
Geographic Information Systems (AM/FM/GIS) and using AI again, will prioritize a list of the
possible outage scenarios. Each scenario is a combination of the possible outage location and
the most likely cause of the outage (down line, blown transformer). Next, the agent will
interrogate the Work Management System (WMS) to determine the best crews and equipment
needed for each of the possible outage scenarios. Finally, the agent will alert and present the
scenarios to the operator(s). An operator can decide which of the scenario should be acted on.
The agent will complete the process by sending out the appropriate dispatch notices.
4
Demand Response Enabling Technology Development Project
June 4, 2003
Summary
The purpose of this RON is to solicit proposals for R&D tasks related to enabling technologies for
integration of utility information systems. The outcome of these R&D tasks is not to produce a
product but to advance enabling technology for use in systems integration.
Proposals may address part or all of the technologies, and/or any related technology, which
furthers the goals described herein.
5
Demand Response Enabling Technology Development Project
June 4, 2003
Acronyms
6
Demand Response Enabling Technology Development Project
June 4, 2003
Acronyms
7
Demand Response Enabling Technology Development Project
June 4, 2003
Definitions
8
Demand Response Enabling Technology Development Project
June 4, 2003
Bibliography
“The Benefits of Integrating Information Systems Across the Energy Enterprise”, EPRI product
number 1001324, Palo Alto, CA: 2000.
http://ciee.ucop.edu/dretd/API_case_study.pdf
CEIDS, Consortium For Electric Infrastructure to Support a Digital Society, Draft R&D Plan,
September 21, 2001.
http://www.e2i.org/docs/CEIDS_RD_Plan_092101.pdf
Mauser, S.F., Gillerman, J., and Nordell, D., “Utility Information Integration – Vision, Benefits,
Strategies, and Status”, 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000.
http://www.computer.org/proceedings/hicss/0493/04934/04934010.pdf
Proudfoot, Douglas, “UCA and 61850 For Dummies”, DistribuTECH 2002, February 27 - March 1,
2002.
http://www.nettedautomation.com/download/UCA and 61850 for dummies V12.pdf
Robinson, Greg, “Key Standards for Utility Enterprise Application Integration (EAI)”, GITA 2002,
Enterprise Application Integration Seminar.
http://scottneumann.com:5714/Presentations/StandardsUtilityEAI.doc
Saxton, Terrence L., “Control Center Communications and Integration Technologies”, NIST
Deregulation Workshop, December 6-8, 1999.
http://www.eeel.nist.gov/deregulation-workshop/Saxton.ppt
Smathers, Douglas C. and Goldsmith, Steven Y., “Agent Concept for Intelligent Distributed
Coordination in the Electric Power Grid”, Sandia National Laboratories, SAND2000-1005, March
2001.
http://certs.lbl.gov/pdf/SAND00-1005.pdf
“Utility Integration Bus (UIB) White Paper”, Systems Integration Specialists Company, Inc. 1999.
http://www.sisconet.com/downloads/uibintro.pdf