Need Analysis
Need Analysis
51
52 Chapter 3
The term needs is not as straightforward as it might appear, and hence the
term is sometimes used to refer to wants, desires, demands, expectation,
motivations, lacks, constraints, and requirements (Brindley 1984, 28).
Needs are often described in terms of a linguistic deficiency, that is, as de-
scribing the difference between what a learner can presently do in a lan-
guage and what he or she should be able to do. This suggests that needs have
objective reality and are simply there waiting to be identified and analyzed.
Porcher (1977, in Brindley 1984,29) offers a different perspective: "Need is
not a thing that exists and might be encountered ready-made on the street. It
is a thing that is constructed, the center of conceptual networks and the .
product of a number of epistemological choices (which are not innocent
themselves, of course)." What is identified as a need is dependent on judg-
ment and reflects the interests and values of those making such a j udgment.
Teachers, learners, employers, parents, and omer stakeholders (discussed in
the next section) may thus all have different views as to what needs are. For
example, in considering the needs of immigrants, representatives of the ma-
jority population may see the immigrants' needs as achieving cultural and
Needs analysis 55
A needs analysis may be conducted for a variety of different users. For ex-
ample, in conducting' a needs analysis to help revise the secondary school
English curriculum in a country, the end users include:
• curriculum officers in the ministry of education, who may wish to use the
information to evaluate the adequacy of existing syllabus, curriculum, and
materials
56 Chapter 3
in schools." Different stakeholders will want different things from the cur-
riculum. Connelly and Clandinin (1988, 131-132) suggest that when a
group of persons are working on a curriculum committee or trying to solve
a curriculum problem they should think of the'planning process as a cur-
riculum stakeholder situation and ask the following questions:
1. What is the purpose of the curriculum situation?
2. If there is a group, what is the makeup of the group?
3. Who set up the project?
4. How were the group's membership and purpose established?
From the answers to these questions, further questions follow:
1. How accountable am I to this stakeholder?
2. How much will this stakeholder be affected by my decision?
3. How much risk is there in ignoring this stakeholder?
4. How much right has this stakeholder to direct my action?
The target population in a needs analysis refers to the people about w,hom
information will be collected. Typically, in language programs these will be
■ language learners or potential language learners, but others are also often
involved depending on whemer they can provide information useful in
meeting the purposes of the needs analysis. For example, in conducting a
needs analysis to determine the focus of an English program in public sec-
ondary schools in an EFL context, the target population might include:
• policymakers
• ministry of education officials
• teachers
• students
• academics
• employers
• vocational training specialists
• parents
• influential individuals and pressure groups
• academic specialists
• community agencies
Within each target group, subcategories of respondents might be needed to
provide different perspectives on needs. For example, in conducting a needs
58 Chapter 3
Planning a needs analysis involves deciding who will administer the needs
analysis and collect and analyze the results. Needs analyses vary in their
scope and demands, from a survey of a whole school population in a coun-
try to a study of a group of thirty learners in a single institution. Sometimes
a team of personnel is assembled specifically for the purpose of doing the
analysis; at other times two or three interested teachers may be the only ones
involved. For example, in a needs analysis of the language needs of non-
English-background students studying at a New Zealand university (see Ap-
pendix 3), the following were involved:
• the research team made up of two academics and a research assistant
• colleagues in different departments who discussed the project and re-
viewed sample questionnaires
• students who piloted the questionnaire
Needs analysis 59
Questionnaires
Questionnaires are one of the most common instruments used. They are rel-
atively easy to prepare, they can be used with large numbers of subjects, and
they obtain information that is relatively easy to tabulate and analyze. They
can also be used to elicit information about many different kinds of-issues,
such as language use, communication difficulties, preferred learning styles,
preferred classroom activities, and attitudes and beliefs,
Questionnaires are either based on a set of structured items (in which the
respondent chooses from a limited number of responses) or unstructured (in
which open-ended questions are given that the respondent can answer as he
or she chooses). Structured items are much easier to analyze and are hence
normally preferred. Appendix 2 illustrates a questionnaire designed as a ba-
sis for planning courses in Cantonese for non-Chinese residents of Hong
Kong. It seeks information on, the following:
• situations in which Cantonese could be used
• self-assessment of current proficiency level in Cantonese
• previous experience of Cantonese courses
- views on textbooks for learning Cantonese
• views on approaches to teaching Cantonese
• learning-style preferences
- views on Cantonese as a language
fA disadvantage of questionnaires, however, is that the information obtained
'may be fairly superficial or imprecise and will often need follow-up to gain
ja fuller understanding of what respondents intend. It should also be recog-
nized that there are many badly designed questionnaires in educational re-
search, and it is advisable to become familiar with the principles of good
questionnaire design to ensure that the information obtained is reliable. Pi-
loting of questionnaires is essential to identify ambiguities and other prob-
lems before the questionnaire is administered. Some issues involved in the
design of questionnaires are given in Appendix 1.
Self-ratings
These consist of scales that students or others use to rate their knowledge
or abilities. (Self-ratings might also be included as part of a questionnaire.)
For example, a student might rate how well he or she can handle a job in-
Needs analysis 61
Interviews
Interviews allow for a more in-depth exploration of issues than is possible
with a questionnaire, though they take longer to administer and are only fea-
sible for smaller groups. An interview may often be useful at the prelimi-
nary stage of designing a questionnaire, since it will help the designer get a
sense of what topics and issues can be focused on in the questionnaire. A
structured interview in which a set series of questions is used allows more
consistency across responses to be obtained. Interviews can be conducted
face-to-face or over the telephone.
Meetings
A meeting allows a large amount of information to be collected in a fairly
short time. For example, a meeting of teachers on the topic "students' prob-
lems with listening comprehension" might generate a wide range of ideas.
However, information obtained in this way may be impressionistic and sub-
jective and reflect the ideas of more outspoken members of a group.
Observation
Observations of learners' behavior in a target situation is another way of as-
sessing their needs. For example, observing clerks performing their jobs in
a bank will enable the observer to arrive at certain conclusions about their
language needs.
However, people"often do not perform well when they are being ob-
served, so this has to be taken into account. In addition, observation is a spe-
cialized skill. Knowing how to observe, what to look for, and how to make
use of the information obtained generally requires specialized training.
• written or oral tasks: Examples of students written or oral work are col-
lected.
• simulations or role plays: Students are given simulations to carry out and
their performance is observed or recorded.
• achievement tests: Students are tested for their abilities in different do-
mains of language use.
• performance tests: Students are tested on job-related or task-related
behaviors, such as "how well a job interview can be carried out in
English."
Task analysis
This refers to analysis of the kinds of tasks the learners will have to carry
out in English in a future occupational or educational setting and assess-
ment of the linguistic characteristics and demands of the tasks. For exam-
ple, a hotel employee might have to perform the following tasks in English:
• greet hotel guests
• inquire about their accommodation needs
• inform them of accommodation available at the hotel
• help mem make a suitable choice of accommodation
• handle check-in procedures
Berwick (1989,57) observes: 'The emphasis of target situation analysis is
on the nature and effect of target language communications in particular sit-
uations (in offices, on assembly lines, in meeting rooms, in content-area
classrooms, for example). Expert analysis of communication establishes
standards against which current performance can be gauged." Once target
tasks have been identified, their linguistic characteristics are determined as
a basis for designing a language course or training materials.
Case studies
With a case study, a single student or a selected group of students is fol-
lowed through a relevant work or educational experience in order to deter-
mine the characteristics of that situation. For example, a newly arrived im-
migrant might be studied for three months, during which time the student
keeps a log' of his or her daily language experiences in English, the situa-
tions in which the language is used, and the problems he or she encounters.
Although'it is generally not possible to generalize from a case study, it pro-
vides a very rich source of information that may complement information
obtained from other sources.
Needs analysis 63
Designing a needs analysis involves choosing from among die various op-
tions discussed above and selecting those that are likely to give a compre-
hensive view of learners' needs and that represent the interests of the dif-
ferent stakeholders involved. Decisions Jiav.e.4o-ie~made_oji_thejJractical
procedures involved in collecting, organizing^analyzing, and reporting the^
information cHlectSOns^naportant to make sure that the needs analysis
doeTncTpToduce an information overload. There needs to be a clear reason
^rji^pjiecting different kinds of mformations_o_asjo_ensure matronly infor-"
mation that_will actuallybe used is collected. In investigating the language"
nee3s"of non-Englisli^blck^romid~lu7dents at a New Zealand university
(Gravatt, Richards, and Lewis 1997), the following procedures were used:
1. Utentorejurvey_
2. analysis of a wide range of survey questionnaires
3. contact with others who had conducted similar surveys
4. interviews with teachers to determine goals
5. identification of participating departments
6. presentation of project proposal to participating departments and iden-
tification of liaison person in each department
7. development of a pilot student and staff questionnaire
8. .review of die questionnaires by colleagues
9. piloting of die questionnaires
10. selection of staff and student subjects
11. developing a schedule for collecting data
12. administration of questionnaires
64 Chapter 3
4. out-of-class projects
5. small-group work
6. demonstrator interactions
7. class participation
However, such a listing provides little useful information about the precise
'type of problems the learners experience in relation to each event. Even if
more detailed information had been provided, the results would grin b^ im-_
pressionistia For example, in relation to event 1 (large-group discussions),
more detailed information could have been sought, from which a further
listing might have resulted - the most difficult aspects of taking part in
group discussions. Johns and Johns (1977) provide such a list based on a
needs analysis of problems students have with discussions. The most fre-
quent difficulties were:
1. comprehension of spoken English ('they speak too fast'; 'they mumble';
'vocabulary is idiomatic')
2. the pressing need to formulate a contribution quickly ('I can't think what
to say')
3. shyness about the value of a contribution ('I might say sometiiing
wrong*)
4. inability to formulate an idea in English ('I don't know how to say it in
English')
5. awareness that a given function may be realized in different ways ('I
don't know the best way to say it')
6. frustration about being unable to enter the discussion ('some students
speak too much*) (Johns and Johns 1977)
Yet even with this more detailed breakdown no direct application to pro-
gram design is possible. In order to develop aims and objectives that ad-
dressed each problem, more analysis and research would be needed to fur-
ther understand what is implied by "comprehension of spoken English" and
before the information obtained could be used in course planning^T^point^
here is that there is no direct application of the information obtained from
jieeds analysis. Although the im^rmaadrigathered is useful, it still hasjo be^
Subjected to a great deal of interpretation before it can be usefully applied
in program_DlannJng.
In the course of carrying out a needs analysis, a large number of poten-
tial needs may be identified. However, these needs will have to be priori-
tized because not all of them may be practical to address in a language pro-
gram, or perhaps the time frame available in the program is suitable for
addressing only a portion of them. And die mere fact that needs have been
66 Chapter 3
identified does not automatically imply that changes will have to be made
in the curriculum. First, the existing curriculum (when there is one) has to
be examined to see to what extent the needs mat have been identified are
being met. Decisions will therefore have to be made concerning which of
the needs are critical, which are important, and which are merely desirable.
In addition, some needs will be immediate and others longer-term. For
some, solutions will be feasible; for others, they may be impractical.
Jx is also important to remember rha^ because needs are not objective facts_
but subjective interpretations of information from a large variety of sources,
1 great rigai Ot consultation k nflfiriftti wifh rhp-j^rimi^aak^n1deTS_tn^en-
surethat the conclusions^i^wn fron^r^ appropriate and
relevant. It often happens that some of the information may be. contradic-
tory^ Stufflebeam et al. (1985, 1X1) remind us:
The process of analysis [of the results of a needs analysis] involves efforts that are
thoughtful, investigatory, systematic, and carefully recorded so that they can be
replicated and reviewed. The primary goal of analysis is to bring meaning to the
obtained information and to do so in the context of some philosophy, relevant
perspectives, and value positions dmt may be in conflict.
Thus, for example, in a needs analysis as part of curriculum renewal in a
state education system, different views of problems in the curriculum
emerged. A number of different points of view emerged as to what should
be changed:
• learners' view: more support for learning needed and reduction of the
amount of materials they had to study
• academics' view: better preparation for tertiary studies needed in terms of
reading and writing skills
• employers' view: better preparation for employment required in terms of
basic communication skills
• teachers' view: better grasp of grammar needed by .learners
Brindley (1989) discusses differences between learners' and teachers' views
of needs and suggests the need for a negotiation process in order to satisfy
and clarify each other's assumptions. The same is true of other stakehold-
ers in the curriculum.
Where there are several different audiences for the needs analysis (e.g.,
teachers, administrators, a funding body), the information obtained will
have to be analyzed - and analyzed in a form that suits each group's inter-
ests. One group may require a brief overview of the findings while another
may be interested in detailed findings. The format for reporting the findings
may also vary. For example, it might include:
Needs analysis 67
CONTEXT ' ~
BACKGROUND
The number of students for whom English is a second language has in-
creased steadily since 1990, and continues to do so. In some faculties as
many as 30 percent of the students are ESL students.
Needs analysis 69
METHOD
Staff questionnaire ' This included some questions from similar instru-
ments developed in other institutions, as well as others specific to issues at
the university. The questions were organized into the following sections.
• background information concerning the course or paper the lecturer was
describing
• overview of problems experienced by ESL students in the course/paper
• linguistic demands of the course/paper in the areas of listening, speaking,
reading, writing, as well as the difficulties experienced by the students in
these areas
• suggestions as to which language skills should be focused on in courses
for ESL students
• modifications made in teaching or in examinations as a result of the dif-
ficulties experienced by ESL students
The questionnaire was piloted and revised before it was distributed. Re-
spondents were identified by the heads of all fifty-one departments at the
university. The results were analyzed overall and by faculty.
PRODUCT
A fifty-seven page report was produced that described the results of the two
survey questionnaires together with a series of recommendations.
70 Chapter 3
CONTEXT
METHOD
Student profiles In, order to develop the program, records were kept of in-
formation garnered during teaching, resulting in the building up of student
and class profiles. The class profiles documented previous learning experi-
ence, strengths and weakness of each student, common areas of interest, in-
dividual and group needs, and reflected areas that would'be useful to focus
on in that class.
ships, old age, work, and leisure to help identify differences between the so-
cial norms in the two cultures. This information then fed into the course con-
tent.
PRODUCT
The project resulted in the preparation of a 156-page tutors' kit that con-
tained the following elements:
a) description of the planning process
b) syllabus frameworks
c) discussion of teaching techniques and activities
d) literacy guidelines
e) worksheets
/) aids and materials
g) discussion of problem areas in English for speakers of Vietnamese
72 Chapter 3
1. Preliminary questions
a) Will it be useful to carry out some interviews before designing the ques-
tionnaire, in order to get a sense of appropriate topics and issues?
b) How large will the sample be? Is it representative of the whole popula-
tion information is needed about?
c) How will the questionnaire be piloted?
d) How will it be administered (e.g., by mail, self-administered, or group-
administered)?
□ □ □
useful Useful useful
Al. Buying things in stores and supermarkets.
□ □
A2. Buying things in the market place.
□ □
D □
□ □ □
A3. Getting information about services and goods
I want to buy. A4. Ordering food in a
restaurant/canteen/cafeteria. A5. Taking a taxi.
□ □
A6. Taking other public transport A7. -
□
D □
□ □ □
D
Asking for directions. A8. Talking to
□ □ □
colleagues at work. A9. Talking to office
□ □
personnel at work. A10. Talking to neighbours.
□ □ □
D
74 Chapter 3
Very Not
n D □
useful Useful useful
Othen
PartB
From the list above please choose five that are the most important for you. Write
the numbers below.
Needs analysis 75
PartC
If you already speak some Cantonese, please indicate your present level of ability
in Cantonese:
CI. Baste (lower): know a few words and fixed expressions; cannot manage con-
versational exchanges; respond to question and answer exchanges on a few
topics; very limited vocabulary, grammar, and knowledge of idioms; pronun-
ciation heavily influenced by motfier tongue.
C2. Basic (upper): know a limited number of common words and expressions;
able to manage limited, short conversations on a few predictable topics; sur-
vival level' knowledge of vocabulary, grammar, and idioms; pronunciation
heavily influenced by mother tongue.
C3. Intermediate (lower): reasonable fluency on a restricted range of topics but
difficulty outside a limited range of topics; many problems with words, id-
ioms, grammar, and pronunciation.
C4. Intermediate (upper): can manage comfortably in familiar situations and with '
familiar topics, though still some difficulty with vocabulary, idioms, grammar,
and pronunciation.
C5. Advanced: able to converse fluently and naturally on most topics; little diffi-
culty with vocabulary, idioms, grammar, and pronunciation.
C6. If you have studied Cantonese, please indicate under what circumstances.
(a) I took a course.
(b) I studied with a private tutor.
(c) I picked up Cantonese informally.
C7. If you attended a formal course, please indicate the length and frequency of the
course (e.g., 6 weeks, 3 hours per week).
C8. How useful was the course? (Please circle your choice.)
Very useful Somewhat useful Not useful
Please explain: -------------------------------------------------------------
76 Chapter 3
C9. If you have used one or more textbooks, please indicate the name of each
text and how useful or otherwise it was:
Very Not
Name of text useful Useful useful
(a) n N n
n n
(b)
n CJ ■L"J
□ U u
(c) U
(d)
CIO. To what would you attribute your present level of ability in Cantonese?
Very Somewhat Not
n □
true true true
Other
PartD
If you have studied Cantonese before, but have since stopped studying Cantonese
please complete Part D below by checking the appropriate box.
I have studied Cantonese before, but I stopped because of the following reason(s):
Very Somewhat Not
□" u n
t
r
u u n
u u □
u
e
n □ n
t
r
u
n n n
□ □
e
D
□ n
t
n
r
u
u
e u ■□
Dl. I did not have time to continue.
D2. I felt that I was not making any progress.
D3. I was not given any opportunity to use
Cantonese outside the classroom. D4.
The lessons were not useful because:
(a) We were not taught things mat I could use.
(b) I found the language too difficult to master.
(c) I found the pronunciation too difficult to
master.
(d) I found the grammar too difficult to master.
(e) I found the vocabulary too difficult to
master.
D5. The teacher did not know how to teach □ □ □
Cantonese. D6. I did not like the teaching methods
D □ □
□ □ n
used. D7. The materials were:
(a) too difficult.
[J LI n
D □ n
(b) not relevant to my needs.
(c) not interesting.
(d) not challenging.
Other
U U D
78 Chapter 3
PartE
Have you ever used the following activities in studying Cantonese? If you indicate
yes, how useful were they?
Very Not
useful Useful useful
n n ■D
El. Practising dialogues from a book. E2. Practising
drills on tones, sounds, and n □ □
grammatical patterns. E3. Free conversation with
D n n
native speakers. E4. Free conversation with other
learners of □ D n
Cantonese. E5. Memorizing bilingual n n n
vocabulary lists. E6. Studying Cantonese textbooks at
n □ □
home. E7. Studying the grammar of Cantonese. E8.
Studying the tone system of Cantonese. E9. Studying □ □ □
n n n
the difference between English and
n □ □
□ D □
Cantonese. E10. Doing pair-work exercises. Ell.
Doing group-work exercises. E12. Doing translation
exercises. E13. Writing down Cantonese using a
□ □ □
n n □
rotnanized
n D □
system. E14. Watching TV in Cantonese at home.
□ D □
E15. Watching or listening to people speaking
Cantonese around me. E16. Using cassettes at
home. E17. Talking to friends in Cantonese. E1S.
□ □ □
□ D □
Trying to use Cantonese whenever I have
the opportunity. El9. Putting myself in situations
□ n □
in which I will
D p □
be forced to speak in Cantonese. E20. Making
□ □ n
myself understood even if I make a
lot of mistakes. E21. Speaking a good Cantonese
□ □ □
without making
mistakes in grammar or pronunciation. E22.
□ □ □
Studying with a private tutor.
□ □ n
Needs analysis 79
Other:
PartF
In class or with a tutor, I would like my teacher to:
Fl. explain new grammar points before No A little Good Best
practising them. F2. practise before No A little Good Best
explaining new grammar
points. F3. correct any mistakes I made in No A little Good Best
front of
others immediately. No A little Good Best
F4. correct my mistakes of grammar.
F5. correct my mistakes of pronunciation. No A little Good Best
F6. use Cantonese only. No A link Good Best
F7. use both English and Cantonese. No A Utile Good Best
PartG
What are your feelings about Cantonese as a language?
Gl. Cantonese is a language with a rich Very true True Not true
vocabulary.. G2. Cantonese is made up of Very true True Not true
many colloquial
expressions. G3. Cantonese is made up of Very true True Not true
many idioms. G4. Cantonese is a very difficult
language. G5. Cantonese is a language with a Very true True Not true
lot of Very true True Not true
grammar. G6. Cantonese is a language where Very true True Not true
pronunciation is very important. G7. Cantonese
is a language where rhythm Very true True Not true
and intonation are important. G8.
Cantonese is a very useful language in Very true True Not true
Hong Kong. G9. Cantonese is a
fascinating language. GIO. Cantonese is a Very true True Not true
beautiful sounding language. Gil. Cantonese is a
polite language. G12. The rhythm and intonation Very true True Not true
of Cantonese Very true True Not true
are pleasing to my ears. G13. Cantonese is Very true True Not true
a harsh sounding language. G14. Cantonese is a
Very True Not tree
vulgar sounding language.
true True Not true
Other: Very
80 Chapter 3
The terra 'N/A' is used in this questionnaire. It means 'Not applicable' and is the
appropriate response if a question does not apply to you.
With which of the following groups do you identify? (please tick the appropriate box):
Q Pacific Island-which? | 1
I J Asian - which country? 1 1
LJ Other (please specify): | J
How many years have you been studying at Auckland University . ______ .
(including 1997)? I _____ I
Please complete this questionnaire with regard to the course you have specified
here.
How often do you have difficulty with each of these skills? (please circle):
Very often Often Sometimes Rarely Never
Reading 1 2 3 4 5
Writing 1 2 3 4 5
Speaking 1 2 3 4 5
Listening 1 2 3 4 5
B. Genera! Statements
Please circle the appropriate response:
How important to success in your course of study are the following abilities?
1. Listening to English High 1 Moderate 2 Low
2. Speaking English 111 3 42 3 555
3. Writing English 42 3 4 5
4. Reading English 2 3 4
How important to success in your field after graduation are the following abilities?
1. Listening to English High 1 Moderate Low 5
2. Speaking English 1 1 1- 2 3 4 55
3. Writing English 2 3 4 5
4. Reading English 2 3 4
■2 3 4
D. Speaking Skills
How often do the following happen to you?
Always Often Sometimes Never 4 N/A
1. Have difficulty giving 1 2 3 5
oral presentations.
2. Have trouble wording 1 2
what you want to say
quickly enough.
3. Worry about saying 1 2
something in case you
make a mistake in your
English.
4. Not know how to say 1 * 3
something in English.
5. Not know the best way to 1 2 3 3
say something in English.
6. Have difficulty with your 1 2 3 3
pronunciation of words.
7. Find it difficult to enter 1 2 •-
discussion.
8. Other (please specify): 1 2
E. Listening Skills
How often do the following happen to you?
Always Often Sometimes Never N/A
1. Have trouble under
standing lectures. 12 3 4 5
Needs analysis 83
o, , G.
a > <
p
CJ 1. How important the skill is, and a« 2 Z
k-«i 2. How often you have problems with the skill: 1 2 3 4
> =£ 2
1 2 3 4 Using correct punctuation and spelling. l 2 3 4
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 Structuring sentences. Using appropriate
l 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 vocabulary. Organising paragraphs. Organising
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 the overall assignment, Expressing ideas
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 appropriately. Developing ideas.
l 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 Expressing what you want to say clearly.
l 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 Addressing topic.
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 Adopting appropriate tone and style.
l 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 Following instructions and directions.
l 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 Evaluating and revising your writing.
l 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 '■Overall writing ability.
1 2 3 4
1 2 3 4 Completing written tasks (e.g., exams, tests)
l 2 *• 4
1 2 3 4 within the time available.
1 2 3 4 12 3 4' Other (please specify): ___ _________________
1234
G. Reading Skills
The following questions concern the reading tasks required of you during die
course. Please indicate:
a) which of the following types of material you are expected to read, and
b) how often you have difficulty doing so (please circle):
Expected Frequency of difficulties
to read? Often Sometimes ■ Never
1. Journal articles Yes/No 1 2 3
2. Newspaper articles Yes/No 1 2 3
Needs analysis 85
Indicate how often you have difficulty with each of the following:
Very often Sometimes Never
10. Understanding the main points of text.
11. Reading a text quickly in order to
establish a general idea of the content
(skimming).
12.' Reading a text slowly and carefully in
order to understand the details of the text.
13. Looking through a text quickly in order
to locate specific information (scanning).
14. Guessing unknown words in a text. 2 3 4 5
15. Understanding text organisation. 2 3 4 5
16. Understanding specialist vocabulary 2 3 4 5
in a text.
17. Reading speed. 2 3 4 5
18. Reading in order to respond critically. 2 3 4 5
19. Understanding a writer's attitude and 2 3 4 5
purpose.
20. General comprehension. 2 3 4 5
21. Other (please specify): _____________ 2 3 4 5
86 Chapter 3
/. Assistance Available
Are you aware of the course available at the Student Leamicg Centre for students
for whom English is a second language? (please circle): Yes / No
If you have taken any of these courses, please state which you have taken and how
useful they were:
Course , Very useful No use at all
------------------------------- 12 3 4 5
------------------------------- 12 3 4 5
------------------------------- 12 3 4 5
If you have answered Yes, please tick the modification which should be made:
K. Additional Comments
Do you have any other comments which might be helpful in assessing what En-
glish skills are expected of you by the University, what specific difficulties you en-
countered in this paper, how English courses could better prepare students such as
yourself for this paper, or anything else relating to your English language skills and
needs? If so, please write them here:
88 Chapter 3
L. Additional Information
If we would like more information from you, would you be prepared to be inter-
viewed? Yes / No
References
Auerbach, E. R. 1995. The politics of the ESL classroom: Issues of power in
pedagogical choices. In Tollefson 1995. 9-33. Berwick, R. 1989. Needs
assessment in language programming: From theory to practice. In R. K. Johnson
(ed.), The second language curriculum. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brindley, G. 1984. Needs analysis and objective setting in the adult migrant ed-
ucation program. Sydney: N.S.W. Adult Migrant Education Service. Brindley,
G. 1989. The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design. In R. K.
Johnson (ed.). The second language curriculum. New York: Cambridge
University Press. Burnett/L. 1998. Issues in immigrant settlement inAustralia.
Sydney: National
Centre for English Language Teaching and Research. Connelly, E. M., and
D. J. Clandinin. 1988. Teachers as curriculum planners.
New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. Elley, W*. 1984. Tailoring
the evaluation to fit the context. In R. K. Johnson (ed.), The second language
curriculum. New York: Cambridge University Press. 270-285. Gravatt, B., J.
Richards, and M.Lewis. 1997'. Language needs in tertiary studies. Auckland:
Occasional Paper Number 10, University of Auckland Institute of Language
Teaching and Learning. Hudelson, S. (ed.). 1993. English as a second language
curriculum resource
handbook. New York: Krause International. Johns, A. M., and T. F. Johns. 1977.
Seminar discussion strategies. In A. P. Cowie and J. B. Heaton (eds.), English for
academic purposes. Reading: University of Reading, BAAL/SELMOUS. Li, D.,
and J. Richards. 1995. Cantonese as a second language: A study of learner needs
and Cantonese course books. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong. Linse,
C. T. 1993. Assessing student needs. In Hudelson 1993. 35-48. Porcher, L. 1977.
Une notion ambigue: les 'besoins Iangagiers'. Les cahiers du
CRELEF3. Pratt, D. 1980. Curriculum: Design and development. New York:
Harcourt Brace. Richards, J. C, and B. Gravatt. 1998. Students'beliefs about
foreign languages. Auckland: Occasional Paper Number 11, University of
Auckland Institute of Language Teaching and Learning. Shaw, J., and G. DowsetL
1986. The evaluation process in the adult migrant education program. Adelaide:
Adult Migrant Education Program. Stufflebeam, D., C. McCormick, R.
Brinkerhoff, and C. Nelson. 1985. Conducting 'educational needs, assessment.
Hingham, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing. Tollefson, J. W. (ed.). 1995. Power
and inequality in language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.