Module 5 - PIPING NETWORKS (Printable)
Module 5 - PIPING NETWORKS (Printable)
ONG, MSManE
Working equations:
The flow rate through the entire system remains constant regardless of the diameters of the individual
pipes in the system.
qA = qB = 𝑞1 = 𝑞2
ENGR. RENATO C. ONG, MSManE
The total head loss in this case is equal to the sum of the head losses in individual pipes in the system,
including the minor losses.
𝐹ℎ1→2 = 𝐹ℎ𝐴 + 𝐹ℎ𝐵
o Note: The expansion or contraction losses at connections are considered to belong to the
smaller-diameter pipe since the expansion and contraction loss coefficients (𝐾𝐿 ) are
defined on the basis of the average velocity in the smaller-diameter pipe.
Or
𝟐𝒇𝑳𝒑𝒊𝒑𝒆𝑨 𝝊𝑨 𝟐 𝝊𝑨 𝟐 𝟐𝒇𝑳𝒑𝒊𝒑𝒆𝑩 𝝊𝑩 𝟐 𝝊𝑩 𝟐 𝝊𝑩 𝟐
𝑭𝒉𝟏→𝟐 = { + ∑[𝑲𝟏 + 𝑲𝟐 + ⋯ + 𝑲𝒏 ] ( )} + { + ∑[𝑲𝟏 + 𝑲𝟐 + ⋯ + 𝑲𝒏 ] ( )} + 𝑲𝑬 𝒐𝒓 𝑪
𝑫𝑨 𝟐 𝑨
𝑫 𝑩 𝟐 𝑩
𝟐
Sample Problem:
Consider the two reservoirs shown in figure below, connected by a single pipe that changes
diameter over its length. The surfaces of the two reservoirs have a difference in level of 9m. The
pipe has a diameter of 200mm for the first 15m (from A to C) then a diameter of 250 mm for the
remaining 45m (from C to B). Determine the flowrate through the piping system.
For the entrance use, 𝐾𝑐 = 0.5 and the exit, 𝐾𝑒 = 1.0. The join at C is sudden. For both pipe,
use 𝑓 = 0.01.
Given:
Pipe D, in mm L, in m 𝑓
1 200 15 0.01
2 250 45 0.01
𝐾𝑐 = 0.5 𝐾𝑒 = 1.0
∆𝑍 = 9𝑚
ENGR. RENATO C. ONG, MSManE
Required: Flowrate, q
Solution:
𝑷 𝒈 𝝊𝟐 −𝒅𝑾𝒔
∆( + 𝒛 + ) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝝆 𝒈𝒄 𝟐 𝒅𝒎
−𝑑𝑊𝑠 ∆𝑃
=0 ; =0
𝑑𝑚 𝜌
𝒈 𝝊 𝟐
∆ ( 𝒛 + ) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝒈𝒄 𝟐
𝑔 m 𝑚2
∆𝑧 = (9.81 ) (9)m = 88.29
𝑔𝑐 sec 2 𝑠𝑒𝑐 2
2 2 2
∆𝜐 𝜐1 − 𝜐2
=
2 2
For series:
𝐪𝐀 = 𝐪𝐁 = 𝒒 𝟏 = 𝒒 𝟐 = 𝒒 𝒏 → 𝝊𝑨 𝑺𝑨 = 𝝊𝑩 𝑺𝑩 = 𝝊𝟏 𝑺𝟏 = 𝝊𝟐 𝑺𝟐
𝜐1 𝑆1 = 𝜐2 𝑆2
𝜋𝐷1 2
𝜐1 𝑆1 𝜐1 ( ) 𝐷 2 (0.20𝑚)2
4
Therefore, 𝜐2 = 𝑆2
= 𝜋𝐷 2 = 𝐷1 2 𝜐1 = (0.25𝑚)2 𝜐1 = 0.64𝜐1
( 2 ) 2
4
2𝑓1 𝐿 𝑇1 𝜐1 2 2𝑓2 𝐿 𝑇2 𝜐2 2
− ∑ 𝐹ℎ = FhA→B = [ ] +[ ]
𝐷1 1
𝐷2 2
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = 𝑭𝒉𝑨→𝑩 = 𝟑. 𝟓𝟑𝟏𝟕𝟔 𝝊𝟏 𝟐
ENGR. RENATO C. ONG, MSManE
𝒈 ∆𝝊𝟐
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = ( ∆𝒛 + )
𝒈𝒄 𝟐
𝑚2 𝜐1 2 − 𝜐2 2
3.53176 𝜐1 2 = 88.29 + ( )
𝑠𝑒𝑐2 2
𝑚2 𝜐12 − (0.64𝜐1)2
3.53176 𝜐1 2 = 88.29 + [ ]
𝑠𝑒𝑐2 2
𝑚2
3.53176 𝜐1 2 = 88.29 + 0.2952 𝜐12
𝑠𝑒𝑐2
𝒎
𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒, 𝝊𝟏 = 𝟓. 𝟐𝟐𝟑
𝒔𝒆𝒄
qA = qB = 𝑞1 = 𝑞2
𝒎 𝝅(𝟎. 𝟐𝒎)𝟐 𝒎𝟑
𝒒 = 𝝊𝟏 𝑺𝟏 = (𝟓. 𝟐𝟐𝟑 )[ ] = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟔𝟒 = 𝒒𝑨 = 𝒒𝑩 = 𝒒𝟏 = 𝒒𝟐
𝒔𝒆𝒄 𝟒 𝒔𝒆𝒄
2
ENGR. RENATO C. ONG, MSManE
Working equations:
For a pipe that branches out into two (or more) parallel pipes and then rejoins at a junction
downstream, the total flow rate is the sum of the flow rates in the individual pipes.
q A = q B = q1 + q 2
The pressure drop (or head loss) in each individual pipe connected in parallel must be the same since
ΔP = PA − PB and the junction pressures PA and PB are the same for all the individual pipes.
𝐹ℎ1 = 𝐹ℎ2
𝟎.𝟓𝟎
𝝊𝟏 𝒇𝟐 𝑳𝑻𝟐 𝑫𝟏
=[ ∙ ]
𝝊𝟐 𝒇𝟏 𝑳𝑻𝟏 𝑫𝟐
𝟎.𝟓𝟎 𝝅𝑫𝟏 𝟐
𝑞1 𝝊𝟏 𝑺𝟏 𝒇𝟐 𝑳𝑻𝟐 𝑫𝟏
𝐴𝑙𝑠𝑜, = =[ ∙ ] [ 𝟒 𝟐]
𝑞2 𝝊𝟐 𝑺𝟐 𝒇𝟏 𝑳𝑻𝟏 𝑫𝟐 𝝅𝑫𝟐
𝟒
𝟎.𝟓𝟎
𝑞1 𝒇𝟐 𝑳𝑻𝟐 𝑫𝟏 𝑫𝟏 𝟐
=[ ∙ ] [ 𝟐]
𝑞2 𝒇𝟏 𝑳𝑻𝟏 𝑫𝟐 𝑫𝟐
Sample Problem:
Two pipes connect two reservoirs (A and B) which have a height difference of 10m. Pipe 1 has diameter
50mm and length 100m. Pipe 2 has diameter 100mm and length 100m. Both have entry loss k = 0.5 and
exit loss k =1.0 and f = 0.008.
Calculate:
1. The rate of flow for each pipe
2. The diameter D of a pipe 100m long that could replace the two pipes and provide the same flow.
Given:
Pipe D, in mm L, in m 𝑓
1 50 100 0.008
2 100 100 0.008
𝐾𝑐 = 0.5 𝐾𝑒 = 1.0
Required:
1. ) 𝑞1 =? 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑞2 =?
2. ) 𝐷 =? 𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 100 𝑚 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛 𝑞1 = 𝑞2
ENGR. RENATO C. ONG, MSManE
Solution:
1. ) 𝑞1 =? 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑞2 =?
Working equation for parallel piping,
q A = q B = q1 + q 2
𝐹ℎ1 = 𝐹ℎ2
𝟎.𝟓𝟎
𝝊𝟏 𝒇𝟐 𝑳𝑻𝟐 𝑫𝟏
=[ ∙ ]
𝝊𝟐 𝒇𝟏 𝑳𝑻𝟏 𝑫𝟐
𝟎.𝟓𝟎
𝑞1 𝒇𝟐 𝑳𝑻𝟐 𝑫𝟏 𝑫𝟏 𝟐
=[ ∙ ] [ 𝟐]
𝑞2 𝒇𝟏 𝑳𝑻𝟏 𝑫𝟐 𝑫𝟐
For parallel, since 𝐹ℎ1 = 𝐹ℎ2 , apply Bernoulli Equation separately to each pipe.
𝑷 𝒈 𝝊𝟐 −𝒅𝑾𝒔
∆( + 𝒛 + ) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝝆 𝒈𝒄 𝟐 𝒅𝒎
−𝑑𝑊𝑠 ∆𝑃 ∆𝜐2
=0 ; =0 ; = 0 (𝑆𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜐1𝑖𝑛 = 𝜐1𝑜𝑢𝑡 )
𝑑𝑚 𝜌 2
𝒈
( ∆𝒛) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝒈𝒄
𝑔 m 𝑚2
∆𝑧 = (9.81 ) (10)m = 98.1
𝑔𝑐 sec 2 𝑠𝑒𝑐 2
𝟐(𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟖)(𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒎)𝝊𝟏 𝟐 𝝊𝟏 𝟐 𝝊𝟏 𝟐
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = 𝑭𝒉𝟏 = [ ] + (𝟎. 𝟓𝟎) + (𝟏. 𝟎)
𝟎. 𝟎𝟓𝒎 𝟏
𝟐 𝟐
𝟐(𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟖)(𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒎)𝝊𝟏 𝟐 𝝊𝟏 𝟐 𝝊𝟏 𝟐
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = 𝑭𝒉𝟏 = [ ] + (𝟎. 𝟓𝟎) + (𝟏. 𝟎)
𝟎. 𝟎𝟓𝒎 𝟏
𝟐 𝟐
𝒈
𝑺𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒆 ∶ ( ∆𝒛) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝒈𝒄
𝑚2 𝑚
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = 𝑭𝒉𝟏 = 𝟑𝟐. 𝟕𝟓𝝊𝟏 𝟐 = 98.1 → 𝜐1 = 1.731
𝑠𝑒𝑐2 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝒎 𝝅(𝟎. 𝟎𝟓𝒎)𝟐 𝒎𝟑
𝒒𝟏 = 𝝊𝟏 𝑺𝟏 = (𝟏. 𝟕𝟑𝟏 )[ ] = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟑𝟒
𝒔𝒆𝒄 𝟒 𝒔𝒆𝒄
𝑷 𝒈 𝝊𝟐 −𝒅𝑾𝒔
∆( + 𝒛 + ) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝝆 𝒈𝒄 𝟐 𝒅𝒎
−𝑑𝑊𝑠 ∆𝑃 ∆𝜐2
=0 ; =0 ; = 0 (𝑆𝑎𝑚𝑒 𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜐1𝑖𝑛 = 𝜐1𝑜𝑢𝑡 )
𝑑𝑚 𝜌 2
𝒈
( ∆𝒛) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝒈𝒄
𝑔 m 𝑚2
∆𝑧 = (9.81 ) (10)m = 98.1
𝑔𝑐 sec 2 𝑠𝑒𝑐 2
𝟐(𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟖)(𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒎)𝝊𝟐 𝟐 𝝊𝟐 𝟐 𝝊𝟐 𝟐
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = 𝑭𝒉𝟐 = [ ] + (𝟎. 𝟓𝟎) + (𝟏. 𝟎)
𝟎. 𝟏𝟎 𝒎 𝟏
𝟐 𝟐
𝟐(𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟖)(𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒎)𝝊𝟐 𝟐 𝝊𝟐 𝟐 𝝊𝟐 𝟐
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = 𝑭𝒉𝟐 = [ ] + (𝟎. 𝟓𝟎) + (𝟏. 𝟎)
𝟎. 𝟏𝟎𝒎 𝟏
𝟐 𝟐
𝒈
𝑺𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒆 ∶ ( ∆𝒛) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝒈𝒄
𝑚2 𝑚
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = 𝑭𝒉𝟐 = 𝟏𝟔. 𝟕𝟓𝝊𝟐 𝟐 = 98.1 → 𝜐2 = 2.42
𝑠𝑒𝑐2 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝒎 𝝅(𝟎. 𝟏𝟎𝒎)𝟐 𝒎𝟑
𝒒𝟐 = 𝝊𝟐 𝑺𝟐 = (𝟐. 𝟒𝟐 )[ ] = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟏𝟗
𝒔𝒆𝒄 𝟒 𝒔𝒆𝒄
𝑚3
. To provide the same flow (𝑞 = 0.0224 𝑠𝑒𝑐 = 𝒒𝟏 = 𝒒𝟐 ) for 100-meter straight pipe,
𝒈
𝑺𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒆 ∶ ( ∆𝒛) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝒈𝒄
𝑚2 2𝑓𝐿𝜐 2
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = 98.1 =
𝑠𝑒𝑐 2 𝐷
𝑚3
𝑞 0.0224 𝑠𝑒𝑐 0.02852
𝜐= = =
𝑠 𝜋𝐷2 𝐷2
( )
4
0.02852 2
𝑚2 2𝑓𝐿𝜐 2 2(0.008)(100𝑚) ( 𝐷2
)
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = 98.1 = =
𝑠𝑒𝑐 2 𝐷 𝐷
𝑚2 0.0013
98.1 2
=
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝐷5
𝟓 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏𝟑
𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆, 𝑫 = √ = 𝟎. 𝟏𝟎𝟓𝟖 𝒎 (𝟏𝟎𝟔 𝒎𝒎)
𝟗𝟖. 𝟏
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉 = 𝑭𝒉𝑨→𝑩 = 𝟑. 𝟓𝟑𝟏𝟕𝟔 𝝊𝟏 𝟐
qA = qB = q1 + q2 = 𝜐1 𝑆1 + 𝜐2 𝑆2
𝜋𝐷1 2
𝜐1 (
𝜐1 𝑆1 4 ) 𝐷1 2 (0.20𝑚)2
Therefore, 𝜐2 = = = 2 𝜐1 = 𝜐 = 0.64𝜐1
𝑆2 𝜋𝐷 2 𝐷2 (0.25𝑚)2 1
( 42 )
𝐹ℎ1 = 𝐹ℎ2
𝟎.𝟓𝟎
𝝊𝟏 𝒇𝟐 𝑳𝑻𝟐 𝑫𝟏
=[ ∙ ]
𝝊𝟐 𝒇𝟏 𝑳𝑻𝟏 𝑫𝟐
𝟎.𝟓𝟎 𝝅𝑫𝟏 𝟐
𝑞1 𝝊𝟏 𝑺𝟏 𝒇𝟐 𝑳𝑻𝟐 𝑫𝟏
𝐴𝑙𝑠𝑜, = =[ ∙ ] [ 𝟒 𝟐]
𝑞2 𝝊𝟐 𝑺𝟐 𝒇𝟏 𝑳𝑻𝟏 𝑫𝟐 𝝅𝑫𝟐
𝟒
ENGR. RENATO C. ONG, MSManE
𝟎.𝟓𝟎
𝑞1 𝒇𝟐 𝑳𝑻𝟐 𝑫𝟏 𝑫𝟏 𝟐
=[ ∙ ] [ 𝟐]
𝑞2 𝒇𝟏 𝑳𝑻𝟏 𝑫𝟐 𝑫𝟐
BRANCHED PIPES:
If pipes connect three reservoirs, as shown in figure below, then the problem becomes more complex.
One of the problems is that it is sometimes difficult to decide which direction fluid will flow.
In practice solutions are now done by computer techniques that can determine flow direction,
however it is useful to examine the techniques necessary to solve this problem.
Working Equations:
𝑞1 = 𝑞2 + 𝑞3 𝑜𝑟 𝑞3 = 𝑞1 + 𝑞2
Sample Problem:
Water flows from reservoir A through pipe 1, diameter 𝐷1 = 120 𝑚𝑚, length 𝐿1 = 120 𝑚, to junction D
from which the two pipes leave, pipe 2, diameter 𝐷2 = 75 𝑚𝑚, length 𝐿2 = 60 𝑚 goes to reservoir B,
and pipe 3, diameter 𝐷3 = 60 𝑚𝑚, length 𝐿3 = 40 𝑚 goes to reservoir C. Reservoir B is 16 m below
reservoir A, and reservoir C is 24 m below reservoir A. All pipe have 𝑓 = 0.01. Ignore entry and exit
losses.
Given:
Pipe D L Flow to
1 120 mm 120 m Junction D
2 75 60 Reservoir B
3 60 40 Reservoir C
Reservoir B is 16 m below Reservoir A
Reservoir C is 24 m below Reservoir A
𝑓 = 0.01 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒𝑠
ENGR. RENATO C. ONG, MSManE
Solution:
We know the flow is from A to D and from D to C but are never quite sure which way
the flow is along the other pipe – either D to B or B to D. We first must assume one
direction.
If that is not correct there will not be a sensible solution. To keep the notation from above
we can write 𝑍𝐴 = 24 ; 𝑍𝐵 = 16 ; 𝑍𝐶 = 0
𝑞1 = 𝑞2 + 𝑞3 𝑜𝑟 𝑞3 = 𝑞1 + 𝑞2
𝜐1 = 0.3906𝜐2 + 0.25𝜐3
2𝑓1 𝐿 𝑇1 𝜐1 2 2𝑓2 𝐿 𝑇2 𝜐2 2
− ∑ 𝐹ℎ = FhA→B = [ ] +[ ]
𝐷1 1
𝐷2 2
𝒈
( ∆𝒛) = ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝒈𝒄
𝒎𝟐
𝟏𝟓𝟔. 𝟗𝟔 = 𝟐𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 + 𝟏𝟔𝝊𝟐 𝟐
𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐
ENGR. RENATO C. ONG, MSManE
2𝑓1 𝐿 𝑇1 𝜐1 2 2𝑓3 𝐿 𝑇3 𝜐3 2
− ∑ 𝐹ℎ = FhA→C = [ ] +[ ]
𝐷1 1
𝐷3 3
𝑔 m 𝒎𝟐
∆𝑧 = (9.81 ) (24)m = 𝟐𝟑𝟓. 𝟒𝟒 𝟐
𝑔𝑐 sec 2 𝒔𝒆𝒄
𝒈
( ∆𝒛) = ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝒈𝒄
𝒎𝟐
𝟐𝟑𝟓. 𝟒𝟒 = 𝟐𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 + 𝟏𝟑. 𝟑𝟑𝝊𝟑 𝟐
𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐
Summary of equations:
𝝊𝟏 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟗𝟎𝟔𝝊𝟐 + 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓𝝊𝟑
𝒎𝟐
𝟏𝟓𝟔. 𝟗𝟔 = 𝟐𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 + 𝟏𝟔𝝊𝟐 𝟐
𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐
𝒎𝟐
𝟐𝟑𝟓. 𝟒𝟒 = 𝟐𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 + 𝟏𝟑. 𝟑𝟑𝝊𝟑 𝟐
𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐
3 unknown, 3 equations, solving simultaneously,
𝝊𝟏 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟗𝟎𝟔𝝊𝟐 + 𝟎. 𝟐𝟓𝝊𝟑
𝜐3 = 4𝜐1 − 1.5624𝜐2
𝒎𝟐
𝟐𝟑𝟓. 𝟒𝟒 = 𝟐𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 + 𝟏𝟑. 𝟑𝟑𝝊𝟑 𝟐
𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐 sub into equation 3
𝒎𝟐 𝟐
𝟐𝟑𝟓. 𝟒𝟒 = 𝟐𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 + 𝟏𝟑. 𝟑𝟑[4𝜐1 − 1.5624𝜐2 ]
𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐
𝒎𝟐
𝟏𝟓𝟔. 𝟗𝟔 = 𝟐𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 + 𝟏𝟔𝝊𝟐 𝟐
𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐
𝜐2 = √9.81 − 1.25𝝊𝟏 𝟐
ENGR. RENATO C. ONG, MSManE
𝒎𝟐 𝟐
𝟐𝟑𝟓. 𝟒𝟒 = 𝟐𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 + 𝟏𝟑. 𝟑𝟑[4𝜐1 − 1.5624𝜐2 ]
𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐
𝟐
𝟐𝟑𝟓. 𝟒𝟒 = 𝟐𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 + 𝟏𝟑. 𝟑𝟑 [4𝜐1 − 1.5624 (√9.81 − 1.25𝝊𝟏 𝟐 )]
𝑚 𝑚 𝑚
𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒, 𝜐1 = 1.82 , 𝜐2 = 2.38 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜐3 = 12.69
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑚3 𝑚3 𝑚3
𝐴𝑙𝑠𝑜 , 𝑞1 = 0.0206 , 𝑞2 = 0.0105 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑞3 = 0.0101
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑠𝑒𝑐
Exercise:
Given a pipe system as shown below .
The total pressure drop is Pa – Pb = 150 kPa and the elevation change is 𝑍𝐵 − 𝑍𝑎 = 5𝑚. Given the
following data:
Solution:
𝑷 𝒈 𝝊𝟐 −𝒅𝑾𝒔
∆( + 𝒛 + ) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉 (𝐵𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑙𝑖 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔)
𝝆 𝒈𝒄 𝟐 𝒅𝒎
∆𝑷 𝒈
( + ∆𝒛) = − ∑ 𝑭𝒉
𝝆 𝒈𝒄
𝑵
∆𝑷 𝒈 𝟏𝟓𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝟐 𝒎 𝒎𝟐
− ∑ 𝑭𝒉𝑨→𝑩 = + ∆𝒛 = 𝒎 + (𝟗. 𝟖 ) (𝟓 𝒎) = 𝟒𝟗. 𝟏𝟓
𝝆 𝒈𝒄 𝑘𝑔 𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐 𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐
1000 3
𝑚
For series,
qA = qB = 𝑞1 = 𝑞2 = 𝑞𝑛 → 𝜐𝐴 𝑆𝐴 = 𝜐𝐵 𝑆𝐵 = 𝜐1 𝑆1 = 𝜐2 𝑆2 = 𝜐3 𝑆3
𝐷 2 82 16
Therefore, 𝜐2 = 𝐷1 2 𝜐1 = 62 𝜐1 = 𝜐
9 1
2
𝐷1 2 82
Also, 𝜐3 = 2 𝜐1 = 𝜐 = 4𝜐1
𝐷3 42 1
𝟐
𝟐𝒇𝟐 (𝟏𝟓𝟎𝒎) (
16 𝜐 ) 𝟐
𝟐𝒇𝟏 (𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒎)𝝊𝟏 𝟐
9 1 𝟐𝒇𝟑 (𝟖𝟎𝒎)(4𝜐1 ) 𝒎𝟐
𝑭𝒉𝑨→𝑩 = [ ] + +𝟎 +[ + 𝟎] = 𝟒𝟗. 𝟏𝟓
𝟎. 𝟎𝟖𝒎 𝟏
𝟎. 𝟎𝟔𝒎 𝟎. 𝟎𝟒𝒎
𝟑
𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐
[ ]𝟐
𝒎𝟐
𝑭𝒉𝑨→𝑩 = [𝟐𝟓𝟎𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 𝒇𝟏 ]𝟏 + [𝟏𝟓𝟖𝟎𝟐. 𝟓𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 𝒇𝟐 ]𝟐 + [𝟔𝟒, 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝝊𝟏 𝟐 𝒇𝟑 ]𝟑 = 𝟒𝟗. 𝟏𝟓
𝒔𝒆𝒄𝟐
𝟏
𝟏𝟎𝟔 𝟑
𝒇 = 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏𝟑𝟕𝟓 [𝟏 + (𝟐𝟎𝟎 (𝜺⁄𝑫) + ) ] 𝑹𝒆 > 𝟒𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝑹𝒆
3. Validate calculated friction factor (𝑓1 , 𝑓2 , 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓3 ) using the computed determined Re-value from step
𝜀
2 and (𝐷) using the empirical friction factor equation.
𝑚
𝜐1 = 0.29
𝑠𝑒𝑐
16 16 𝑚 𝑚
𝜐2 = 𝜐1 = (0.29 ) = 0.5156
9 9 𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑚 𝑚
𝜐3 = 4𝜐1 = 4 (0.29 ) = 1.16
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑠𝑒𝑐