Assignment 1_OB
Assignment 1_OB
Introduction:
Transnational project groups are flourishing in various business contexts. They make up
cross-cultural teams; that is, they encompass members of different nationalities. The
effectiveness and efficiency of projects are affected by their cross-cultural characteristics.
The following paper claims that cross-cultural teams can be more effective than inter-
company teams.
Methods:
The fieldwork for this research consisted mainly of interviews with the project members and
attendance to meetings as a participant-observer. The data analysis was made through two
stages: description of each case and comparative analysis of three cases. Case 1: A
consortium for R&D, Case 2: A project team in electrical engineering, Case 3: A product
development project
Finding:
The study evidences three kinds of cross-cultural practices implemented by transnational
project managers. It is essential to mention that these strategies are not exclusive. One given
leader often resorts to several strategies simultaneously, and within one project, cross-cultural
leaders at various levels often set up different strategies. In the electrical engineering project,
the Swiss manager declared he did not want to make any difference and managed all his team
members the same way. Interviewees say cross-cultural teams could not be effective without
'openness, patience and self-control. Some German members of the product development
project said they would not put up with other Germans coming to meetings unprepared but
accepted it from their French colleagues. Despite their irritation, they control themselves to
avoid conflicts. Cross-cultural management, which mainly relies on the willingness of
participants as in Case 2, generates frustrations. The small informal groups of nationals that
form up at breaks often release part of the tensions that members experience because of
permanent self-control. However, all required adjustments are not so immediate.
The second strategy for coping with cultural differences is to make team members well
acquainted with one another. Social events like diners help develop acquaintance,
collaboration, or even friendship among team members. The limit of this strategy stems from
the frailty of empirical adjustments, which do not clear up the eventual matters of conflict.
Engineering culture played a leading role in overcoming cultural barriers. All members
shared a common core of knowledge, know-how, and representations. Research shows that
the corporate culture remained in an embryonic state where it was susceptible to play a
significant role
Conclusion:
The strategies to cope with cross-cultural differences are themselves culture-bound. Cross-
cultural management in international projects is contingent. The approaches to coping with
cultural barriers (individual adjustments, occupational cultures, cultural mediator) and
solutions are also culture-bound. They depend on the context, But by using effective coping
and collaboration strategies, a multinational project team can work more effectively and
create more output than a national project team.
Next, he examined the High-context cultures and low-context cultures. In this research, he
made it from the perspective of communication style, where Vietnam and other Asian
countries like South Korea, China, and Japan are high-context cultures. In Contrast, English-
speaking countries like the United Kingdom, Australia, and the United States are low-context
cultures. Communicators in high-context cultures are more aware of their surroundings and
environment, conveying their sentiments without using words. On the other
hand, collectivism refers to group-oriented cultures in which individuals favor positive
politeness tactics to satisfy each person's positive face demand, although conscious of
preserving both one's own and the other's face. The article states that communication across
the culture has many barriers like Attitude, Perception, Stereotypes, Interpretation, Culture
shock.
Conclusion:
Cultural effects are a natural part of all communications. The phrase "culture" refers to the
total of a big group of people's language, values, beliefs, habits, and customs. Cross-cultural
communication encourages international team working which is a key to promoting the
principles of formal organizations. To have successful cross-culture communication, people
have to overcome the barriers of cross-culture communication. The one who achieves
communicative competence will be a successful communicator. To decrease the challenges in
cross-cultural communication, cross-cultural research on speech act performance should be
done.
Topic: Personality
Article Title: Effect of Personality on Motivation and Organisational Behaviour
Author: Ashveen Nuckcheddy
Introduction:
The topic of "personality's influence on motivation and organizational behavior" was the
subject of this article's literature study. When it comes to managing staff, companies must
consider the link between Personality and motivation and how the former impacts the latter.
This study attempts to demonstrate and examine it further in the context of Personality and
individual differences in affecting overall organizational Behaviour.
Review of Literature:
Ashveen Nuckcheddy's study reviews important publications on Personality, motivation, and
individual variations. The study's theoretical analysis of personality theories included
personality theory, psychoanalytic, humanistic, and social-cognitive theories. According to
the study, personal emotional stability, antagonism, and extrovert or introvert worker
characteristics all influence motivation. Personality has also significantly influenced
organizational Behaviour through affecting tolerance, work environment, and work ethics.
Conclusion:
The study concluded that Personality is an essential factor to consider when enhancing
employee engagement and workplace organizational behavior. If organizations follow this
strategy, their human resource plans and policies are more likely to succeed. One of the ways
to improve the Personality and the morale of the employees is by motivation.
Topic: Personality
Journal Title: Review of the current status of the study on personality traits
Introduction:
Personality refers to individual differences in thinking, emotion, and acting tendencies. One
of the primary aims of this paper is to study the particular personality qualities, such as
friendliness or irritability & another aim of this research paper is to comprehend how a
person's various pieces come together as a whole. An approach of an individual to his work
or learn depends upon his Personality, therefore it of utmost importance to an organization to
recriuit an individual with the right Personality or offer job roles to an individual depending
on his Personality so that maximum output can be achieved from the employee.
Methods:
For the research, journal articles published online, soft copies of books available for free
download, and online versions of classic papers in personality traits research were searched
and downloaded. These articles were searched in time span from 1930 to 2017. These articles
were used to study personality qualities.
Findings:
The Big Five qualities (openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness,
extraversion, and neuroticism) have been widely recognised as trait models.
Authoritarianism, individualism, internal vs. external locus of control, desire for
achievement, need for cognition, regulatory focus, self-consciousness, sensory seeking, and
self-esteem are just a few of them. The potential of personality traits to predict an individual's
future conduct is the essential benefit of studying them. From circumstance to situation, these
abilities reflect their respective individual differences.
Conclusion:
The primary goal of trait psychology is to understand the consistency of personality traits and
the Behavior these traits induce. The term "trait" refers to the consistency of patterns in a
person's Personality throughout time. Personality factors account for the relative consistency
of behaviors across situations. However, another intriguing area where contemporary trait
researchers are working to understand better is if personality traits are consistent across a
person's lifetime.
Walter Mischel, a pioneer in trait psychology, underlined the importance of context variables
in assessing traits in 1968. Even though the study of personality traits has been going on for
decades, the Big Five Model, which was first published in the 1980s, remains the master
question for many academics. The investigation into the causes of traits has remained mostly
unchanged. However, the critical results that all trait-related behaviours cannot be traced to
genes have been called into question. The use of statistics and computer technologies to
quantify personality traits has advanced the field of research.
Topic: Perception & Learning
Title: Workplace learning: developing a holistic model
Author: Pamela Matthews
Introduction:
Workplace learning can take a variety of forms, including formal, informal, and incidental
learning. There is increasing recognition for workplace learning, but employees must realize
the benefits of workplace learning to evolve into a learning organization. Workplace learning
is highly complex and involves more than simple training and development issues. The nature
of the work environment, the pace of change, use of technology, teaching, and learning styles
all impact how learning takes place in the workplace. Workplace learning requires integrating
diverse factors such as adult learning theory; learning paradigms; organizational needs; and
individual interests, which can result in positive workplace learning. The proposed workplace
learning model outlined by the writer of this paper draws upon various ideas presented by
recognized academics and includes elements of relevance for most workplaces.
Review of Literature:
Rylatt originally proposed the Model of workplace learning discussed by the writer. The
concept that individuals and organizations must change their previous attitudes or mindsets
about the workplace underpins this Model's development. Because "mindsets have the power
to transform the growth and performance of the workforce by providing much-needed clarity
and a sense of purpose to all actions, goals, and strategies," a positive attitude is required. The
eight mindsets identified by Rylatt (1994, pp. 17-21) as essential to the process of workplace
learning transformation are:
1. Workplace learning must be greater than change
2. Workplace learning must be systematic and interactive.
3. Workplace learning must be geared to business outcomes.
4. Workplace learning must provide meaning, self-worth, and sustainment for all
employees
5. Workplace learning must be learner-driven. Workplace learning should be flexible
enough to respond to the needs of the individuals
6. Workplace learning must be competency-based.
7. Workplace learning must be "just-in time". As workplaces are becoming more
accountable for the "learning" they provide, there is a need to deliver workplace
learning on time.
8. Workplace learning must expand into new frontiers of knowledge.
Individual learners, company objectives, and the future are all considered while building
these new mindsets. Rylatt (1994, p. 17) describes workplace learning as a systematic and
interactive process that must consider a variety of factors before improved company results,
competency improvement, and highly satisfied employees can be attained.
Conclusion:
Universities, as educational institutions, should strive to be learning organizations. It is clear
from the discussion of the concept and application of workplace learning and the examples
drawn from "new" universities that universities advocate and support the need for workplace
learning. Still, like other organizations, they are unwilling to allocate resources to this area as
tangible, quantifiable outcomes. This trend is particularly evident in the business world,
where executives are preoccupied with immediate productivity, efficiency, and profitability
concerns and are sometimes unable or reluctant to engage in employee development because
they cannot quantify the benefits. The growing awareness of the need for workplace learning
is a good start, but the momentum must be maintained.
Individuals and organizations will become more dedicated to utilizing workplace
learning activities as they realize the benefits, such as enhanced employee dedication, a more
flexible and rapid reaction to global, environmental, and technological change, and improved
productivity and quality.