No Great Reset

 The Greatest Discovery in History Overshadowed 

Vesselin C. Noninski

New York
Copyright © 2021 by Vesselin C. Noninski
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the
written permission of the author.

Printed in the United States of America.

Published by Shakespeare & Co., 939 Lexington Avenue, New York,

NY 10065
Cover is from a stock image on www.canva.com
Dedicated to those who recognize the reality of truth and are resilient to
manipulation.
  TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Preface ........................................................................................ 1

Crucial Fact.... ..........................................................................13

Introduction ........................................................................... 18

Elements of the “Great Reset”.................................................. 44

Not a “Restart” but a “Great Reset”

Elements of the “Great Reset”..... .............................................. 72

Worries About Economy Unduly Dominate “Great Reset” Talk

Elements of the “Great Reset”................................................... 90

Acceleration of Human Thought and Where Computers Began

Elements of the “Great Reset”.................................................119

Increase of Government to the Extent of Totalitarian Rule

Destroyed Common Ground of Ideologies and the Greatest

Discovery in Science..........................................................158

Pattern Evidence and the “Great Reset”.....................................160

Uncertainty in Conclusions...........................................'.... 184

Political Pivot of this Book........................................................195

New Pro-Active Approach—Personally Seeking Unequivocal
Truth...........................................................................................237

Quantum Mechanics, Anyone?.......................................... 243

Perceived Digital Transformation Acceleration........ ..............252

Conclusion.......................................................................... 274

Epilogue .............................................................................. 285

Addendum .......................................................................... 291

References ........................................................................... 303

 Preface
-

TERMS USED—Henceforth, for brevity, COVID-19 is substituted

by the prefix “cov-”, forming terms such as “cov-crisis”, “cov-panic” or
“cov-pandemic”. In this book the writers advocating the so-called “great
reset”, are called “thegreatresetters”. Whenever the alleged or purported
COVID-19 pandemic is spelled out only as “pandemic”, without the
qualifiers, it is always meant “alleged pandemic” or “purported
pandemic”. The period beginning after the alleged cov-pandemic
subsides, is referred to as the “post cov-pandemic” and, of course, it is
again meant alleged cov-pandemic. The reasons for using qualifiers such
as “alleged” or “purported” will become clear subsequently. This book
emphasizes the pattern of the curves exhibited in the graphs of daily or
weekly absolute number of deaths from all causes as an absolute
criterion for the existence of anomaly in the health conditions of a
country. For brevity this pattern is termed “pattern-evidence”. Also,
this book makes a distinction between cov-crisis, which is
unquestionable, on the one hand, and, on the other, the cov-pandemic,
which is a subject of debate both in view of its own reality and as a
genuine, not media-created, impetus for the observed cov-crisis. The
prefix “cov-” in cov-crisis reflects the popular perception that the crisis
observed is caused by an apparent cov-pandemic, not that this author
considers that the apparent cov-pandemic is truly the root for the cov-
crisis.
Also, this book uses “collectivism” and occasionally
“homogenization”, which have the same connotation when it comes to
the ultimate goal of the elite consisting of a few super-rich individuals,
the threshold between the super-rich and the rest being in the tens of
billions of dollars. Intellectual elite is a separate category, which in the
academia mainstream today are the mindless adherents to relativity and

1
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

progeny. Those that are placed in leading positions in world

organizations, presidents and prime-ministers of countries are the
opportunists, the comprador sycophants of the super-wealthy elite, its
bellboys and lackeys, carefully listening to what said elite wants them to
say and how to act.
This book mainly uses the term “great reset” because of the recent
introduction of that term and in view of the fact that the term is giving
the title of this book. However, the terms “post-modernism”, “post-
industrial society” as well as “globalism”, which can be used
interchangeably, are terms that can also be used. This is the society after
the nineteen sixties governed by unifying “collectivism”, which
espouses common doctrine defined by the pejorative term “paradigm”,
a doctrine which disregards the concept of truth but can be wrapped
around any frivolous concept which serves the interests of the
collective. Real science denounces the concept of “paradigm”. No
serious text having anything to do with real science uses the term
“paradigm”. Using “paradigm” diminishes the trustworthiness of the
conclusions made. The society described by the terms “post-
modernism”, “post-industrial society” and “globalism” has been the
decades-long underpinning of the “great reset”. The occasionally used
term “post-industrial society” is, obviously, having more to do with the
economy, while the term “post-modernism” having a more cultural
hue, especially with its denial of the reality of truth and the emphasis
on the biological in an even wider sense than the classic biologism of the
Nazis, the latter limiting itself only to racism. The “great reset” is an
opportune redundant term, coined as a result of a purported cov-
pandemic, a term used to signify the ostensibly expected final triumph
of “post-industrial society”, respectively, “post-modernism”, in an
environment specially destroyed for that purpose by a designer-event
said to be cov-pandemic. However, let us not get ahead of ourselves and
see what we will find further in this book by first talking about the
discovery which determines the atmosphere of the entire book.

2
  Preface 

THE GREATEST DISCOVERY IN THE HISTORY OF

THE WORLD—My discovery that a theory so widely portrayed as
genius theory is actually pure nonsense, proved unequivocally
in the Addendum to this book, is the greatest discovery in the
history of humanity. This is the greatest discovery because it
poses an insurmountable barrier to any attempt to distort the most
fundamental concepts of human cognition—time and space—
and provides conclusive proof for their absoluteness, with all the
scientific and philosophical implications from it, compared to any
other discovery ever made.
This greatest discovery in history that I made, presented here as
Addendum, demonstrates that any deviation and attempt to deny the
absolute character of space and time, immediately leads to catastrophic
absurdities, such as claiming that one body in one system can obey two
different laws of motion at the same time, or that a theory can at the
same time obey and disobey its own definition. Any claim that time and
its rate can be different in different coordinate systems, immediately
leads to the violation of the absolute truth that spatially coinciding
clocks are synchronous. In other words, denial that time is absolute
denies the absolute truth that time at a given moment, in a given place,
cannot have two different values. Therefore, any attempt to deny the
absoluteness of time and space would at once lead to brazen absurdity
and utter nonsense.
Anyone who doubts the above and still thinks that relativity is a
genius theory, is deceiving himself. He is either a victim of the very
aggressive brainwashing, continuing for more than a century, or is paid
to wangle, accepting the lie as the truth. The interesting thing is that,
even if now I’m the only one in the world who thinks so, so be it. I am
right and everyone else who thinks otherwise is deceiving himself, which
one day, sooner or later, will become clear to the whole world.
The world today is staunchly brainwashed, by the mostly privately
owned media, into ignoring the above. The global mass media is
immersed in the outrageous brazen lies, portraying absurdity and
nonsense of relativity and progeny, as exceptional achievements of
science.

3
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Having said the above, there is no wonder why this book devoted to a
proposed new order of the world, or any book for that matter,
discussing global problems, must begin with the above absolute
reminder from which this very dramatic conclusion follows: If lying; at
that, on such a scale, can so widely and so brazenly be allowed by the
highest places of authority, regarding a topic for which I give direct
absolute evidence that it is nonsense, as seen in the Addendum, then
everything else we are officially told must be questioned or, even more
prudently, be assumed to be a brazen lie. This inference by analogy is
inevitable, especially when purported phenomenon such as cov-
pandemic, is pushed by the authorities as an absolute fact; at that, a fact
touted to lead to another dramatic consequence for the world, the
“great reset”, but the absolute truth of pattern-evidence to be shown
later, does not support such absoluteness of that alleged fact.
Further on in this book, there will be a discussion of the
scientificity of the various purportedly scientific disciplines. Although
some of it will be repeated below, it seems it would make sense to
mention it in this context as well. When speaking of science and
arguments, it won’t hurt noting that, for someone, a real scientist in the
exact sciences, to discuss the reality of a claim, such as the
anthropogenic character of climate change, is a waste of time. No firm
evidence can ever be found, neither “for” nor “against”, regarding that
matter. Things are better in this respect when a real scientist is to judge
the reality of a health anomaly in a given country—if there are no
discrepancies in the pattern-evidence data throughout the years, let
alone, if the pattern-evidence shows practical constancy throughout the
studied period, then it can be concluded that there is no health anomaly
in the country and no epidemic caused by the increased number of
deaths due to one or more causes from the overall mix of causes of
deaths. On the other hand, even if there are maximums in the pattern-
evidence, they may not prove the reality of the epidemic due to a
purported cause, since events such as a lockdown, which the officials
may have wrongly ascribed to a given agent, cause turmoil and disorder
of the entire health system, which causes neglect of the really serious,
really deadly diseases, and that causes the increased mortality and the
maximum in the pattern-evidence. The healthcare system is holding
onto a very fine balance and should not be played with. It is deadly to
underestimate that fine balance.

4
  Preface 

It is even deadlier to have the thinking of the world messed up through

corrupt imposition by the global media of absurdities such as relativity,
subversively presenting these absurdities as science. Insecurities in
thinking, conditioned by the world appropriation of relativity,
amounting to destroyed fundamental views such as time and space,
outright pre-determining low quality of any analysis, including the
analysis of global health matters, allows for charlatans to invade and use
these ill-conceived health matters for their insidious purposes. That is
what has happened and that is deadly.
That said, it must be added that, even if the approach is the most
honest, to expect that disciplines such as history or psychology, in which
I include philosophy as a branch of theoretical psychology, can have
anything to do with science, is to indulge in sweet delusions. Such
inflation of the term “science” for propaganda purposes must be
vigorously discouraged. Misuse of the label “scientific” is especially ill-
advised when it concerns public health matters. Full-fledged use of the
term “science” is justified only when it is applied to the exact sciences
such as physics and chemistry. The population must be clearly advised
about this real usage of the term “science” and be spared the role of a
victim of the deception that talk about climate change or medicine
is honoring science.
Not to mention that in the exact sciences themselves, no evidence
can be compared in its general significance, definitiveness, laconism and
rigor, to my absolute proof concerning time and space. Any further
mental occupation and syllogism, everything related to thinking in
general, must begin from this absolute proof which I discovered, and
which, by the way, unequivocally sends relativity—the real intellectual
pandemic—to the waste heap of history like nothing else before. Most
of all, it is exactly from this absolute proof which I have given, from
where the absolute conviction must begin that there is a single truth and
also that truth is real, not just an invention, a metaphor, a
question of interpretation or a matter of perspective, as the new,
perfected Nazi ideology, the post-modernism, pontificates, poisoning
the minds of the youth in the universities. In other words, if we

5
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

reduce the above to the more political focus of the discussions in this
book, then it is my absolute proof, shown in the Addendum, that is the
starting point which must mark the beginning of the rejection of the
most perfect Nazism, now known as post-modernism, post-industrial
society or globalism, terms that are recently expressed by the general
collective term “great reset”.
NO GLOBAL PROBLEMS SHOULD DISTRACT
FROM THE NEED FOR QUALITY THINKING—Therefore,
over and above the details of the system functioning, when it comes to
the real core of the world’s existence, the quality of thinking, the
maintaining of the high quality of the human cognition and intelligence
has absolute precedence.
Having the high quality of thinking as the absolute goal of
humanity, as far as the practical implementation of that goal, there can
never be too much reminding, in terms of global policies, that nothing
can compare in significance to the pro-actively recognizing of my
absolute unequivocal argument proving the absurdity of relativity and
progeny and stopping the exuberant public funding of that absurdity.
In other cases, such as the reality of cov-pandemic, which are in
need of clear understanding but intrinsically devoid of possibility to
personally reach the needed clarity, we do what we can with the
otherwise absolute truths revealing partial aspects of the big question
for the reality of the cov-pandemic. These partial absolute truths incur
cracks in the official, monolithically presented thesis for its
unquestionable veracity. This availability of absolute truths pertaining
to questions such as the reality of cov-pandemic, no matter how much
these absolute truths being only fragments regarding the wholesomeness
of the thesis, constitutes a great chance, because in other cases of
promoted global policies, even such a chance is wanting. For example,
the manipulators on both sides of the issue, “pro” and “con”,
concerning the reality of the human effect on climate change, cannot
come up with even one truly reliable absolute truth which one can
personally verify, comparable to the absolute truth of the pattern-
evidence pertaining to the alleged cov-pandemic, let alone compared to
the shining example of the absolute truth proving unequivocally the
absurdity of relativity, mandating the absolute removal of relativity and

6
  Preface 

progeny from science. This lack of even directly examinable elements of

absolute truth, gives the promoters of the idea of anthropogenic climate
change, once politically imposed on the world, a free rein and unbridled
opportunities of charlatan-style milking of society.
WHAT THIS BOOK TRIES TO ACHIEVE—The author
of this book is on a mission to restore the confidence that truth
is real, confidence greatly shaken by the deliberate decimation
of science during the twentieth century. There cannot be
correct thinking without the firm conviction that truth exists, that
truth is real, achievable and is not only a matter of point of
view or interpretation, that truth is not only an invention or a
metaphor. Without correct thinking, it is impossible to properly
approach any problem, from the most mundane everyday problem,
to the gravest problems of the world, pandemics and climate
change claimed to be human-induced included. Without correct
thinking one falls easy prey to demagogues and manipulators of
the type of those who favor globalism in its various forms.
Decision-makers and honest commanders of the world, even
the elected ones, risk directing society into a dead-end when not
thinking correctly. Even the hunch or common sense of an
everyday person or of a politician or a decision-maker, will
suffer, if his thinking is based on mauled fundamentals which he
takes for granted. Thinking on the backdrop of falsely believing
that space can be curved or that the pace of time may change,
no matter how remote from the everyday tasks of the
individual these problems may seem to be, combined with the
deliberately instilled insecurity about the absolute fact that
truth exists and is unique, puts in jeopardy not only individual
lives but also entire nations and the world. We have seen a
United States President who has led the world, mistakenly
convinced that the US Constitution is characterized by a
space which can be curved because physics had said so. Real,
uncorrupted physics has never said so, and to lead the world
while having the basic notions of your thinking, such as space, so
confused, is a guarantee for bad leadership, putting the whole
world in jeopardy, as was the case with that president.

7
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Thus, before talking about details regarding the concept, the “great
reset”, which is making headlines these days and which is in the title of
this book, a dive will be taken into the most important topic of our
time, the absurdity of the theory of relativity, henceforth referred
to as relativity.
Today’s science, allowing itself to endure the assault and be a
hostage of the absurdity of relativity, which comprises the single most
significant global suppression, is the area in the real need of overhaul
and a great reset, because science, being in its present ruined state,
underlies all the troubles of the world. Being a factor undermining the
quality of thinking on the most fundamental level, holding society in
the custody of adopting its current absurdity as the standard of
intellectual achievement, thus falsely engulfing society into thinking
that the absurd science of today is the epitome of great science, that the
absurd relativity is the Royal crown of intellectual achievement,
comprises the pivot of the massive degradation of thinking and is every
bit responsible for the poor analysis of global problems, including the
reality of the cov-pandemic, where cov-crisis came about and how
much it presupposes a “great reset”. Therefore, the beginning of
the intellectual catharsis of the world must start with nothing other
than with the denunciation of relativity’s toxic presence in
science. The absolute, unequivocal proof shown in the Addendum,
is the ultimate founding lesson, teaching how every other global
problem must be approached and resolved.
My discovery presented in the Addendum, showing how
finding an absolute truth defining the problem can bring final
resolution to the greatest problem of humanity—the mauling of the
concepts of time and space—was a real eyeopener to the fact that
there is no other possible way to accomplish that desired
mandatory confidence in truth and the only possible way of bringing
closure to even the pivotal problems of world significance.
Only the discovery of absolute truths defining the problem,
would really successfully exclude any attempts at objection, to say
nothing of finagling and other adversarial acts, aimed at conserving the
status quo.

8
  Preface 

The tragedy is that if we have the misfortune not to be able to discover

absolute truths that we can personally vouch for, we inevitably fall into
the claws of various adversarial secret societies, charlatans and plain liars
and opportunists. So far, relativity is the only area of world significance
where the closure is accomplished with full certainty, available for
everyone’s personal inspection. Thus, when it comes to the chance of
discovering crucial unequivocal absolute truths, in the case of relativity
this author has met with full success, in the cov-pandemic case with only
partial success, while there are topics such as climate change where there
are no absolute solutions resulting from discovering absolute truths, and
we, as independent individuals, are entirely at the mercy of the-powers-
that-be and their manipulations. The above is discussed more in a special
section of this book (cf. “NEW PRO-ACTIVE APPROACH
IN ANALYSIS—PERSONAL SEEKING UNEQUIVOCAL
PROOF”).
This one major discovery made by this author, described in the
Addendum, the shining example of his efforts, concerns the root of all
global evil, the root of the global destruction of thinking, leading to
everything else that destroys the world. Given as the Addendum in this
book, that discovery provides the absolute ground zero from where the
restoration of the cognitive nature of humanity must begin. Ignoring
that initial solid ground dooms to failure any attempt to solve global
problems, such as the reality of the purported anthropogenic
climate change or the “great reset”—if the great reset is at all an honest
attempt to help the world and not another tool of slavery, as the
analysis of the “great reset” promoted by “thegreatresetter” reveals it to
be.
Thus, reassured by the absolute proof in the Addendum that
truth is real and can be achieved, we use that as a steady ground from
where we proceed to analyze other more complex problems, with the
hope that we can find clues to reach a greater clarity. As a more limited
consequence of the mentioned search for absolute truths, this book
shakes the confidence in the reality of the tool, the cov-pandemic,
exploited to institute the much advertised so-called “great reset”—a way
which, although presented as a road to save the world from future crises,
appears more as a way to reinstate the slavery of collectivism in society
and the totalitarian control over it, by exploiting a made-up cov-crisis as

9
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

an instrument of an infinitesimal in number super-monied elite, in order

to allow that elite ensure its own survival, privileges and ruling status by
ineptly attempting to wipe out the world mess this very same elite has
created. The collectivism in its new design now christened “great reset”,
would allow the elite in question, as collectivism always does, to govern
society seamlessly through the turbulent waters building up for over a
century, threatening the very existence of the elite, turbulence
aggravated by the inevitable technical development, ensuring also greater
opening and wiretapping of the world. The opening in question
is unidirectional, which, in concert with the immense potential
of wiretapping enhanced by the technical development,
harnessed “properly” by the elite, works in favor of the elite to an
extent of suppression never achieved in the history of the world.
These will be some of the topics discussed in this book.
Furthermore, “great reset” or not, the important thing about
the arguments based on absolute truths is that they are based on publicly
available texts and data. This applies not only to the sheer luck to have
the absolute shining example unequivocally bringing down relativity (cf.
Addendum) but also the luck to have absolute data, in the form of
pattern-evidence, regarding the much more difficult, albeit of lesser
global importance compared to relativity, public health problem. These
absolute arguments illustrate how ordinary people, who don’t know
where to begin when it comes to accessing the intricacies and intentions
of the elite governing everyone’s life, including by the elite using public
health scare as an instrument of manipulation, can find a solid ground
from where to start their unpacking of the real phenomena which affect
these ordinary people’s lives. In their obviousness, the absolute
arguments also do not require any kind of specialized education or a
consultation with a specialist and his biases. Any ordinary person, upon
seeing the data, should be able to form an opinion, and should be able to
begin wondering about the media stories forged despite such in-your-
face devastating facts. Regarding the health problem, the media,
obviously serving agendas, is on a rampage to opening up on telling
inside hospital stories, which the usual ethics and moral standards
never allowed it to cross before, thus shamefully compensating for the
opposite impression; namely, that there is no health problem.

10
  Preface 

which the absolute truth of pattern-evidence would create if

disseminated. The panic, fueled in this way, has its insidious ulterior
totalitarian purposes, also discussed in this book. The absoluteness of the
final existential data which is discussed below (cf. “LONGER
TERM PATTERN-EVIDENCE” and “PATTERN-EVIDENCE
FOR THE SAME PERIOD WHEN “GREAT RESET” IDEA
WAS BORN”), and the governments as purely
administrative, almost absolute guarantors, of its
trustworthiness, definitively excludes any attempt to
diminish the significance of the pattern-evidence findings, by
the usual pronouncing such inconvenient proof, countering the
official version, as the thinking of a conspiracy theorist.
This looking for absolute truths as an aid to begin the
understanding as to what exactly is going on when grand events, such as
the cov-crisis, as if coming from nowhere, are touted on people, is all
well and good. It should be admitted, however, that, unlike the
definitive proving that relativity is absurdity, in the medical case,
the absolute truths presented cannot give final answers. This may sound
discouraging. The mentioned final debunking of relativity, however,
reassures the reader that his personal attempt to find ultimate,
categorical answers, is not always hopeless. The absolute proof
that relativity is absurdity throws a rope of hope at the reader that
unequivocal proof of truth is achievable. Thus, the partial but
insufficient for a categorical conclusion absolute truths regarding the
reality of a public health problem, are coupled with an even
more significant case, relativity, whereby the reader may see that it
is in his full personal power to reach, on his own, even final
understanding of the most important world problem, marring
science for over a century, thus destroying the intellect of the world.
The hoax of world impositions of a false doctrine, exemplified
by relativity, which is of even higher world effect and even
broader and more enduring global persistence than the cov-crisis, is
unveiled right in front of the reader’s eyes in the Addendum at
the end of this book. Relativity is the hoax of the century. It dwarfs
anything that can be said about any other hoax, including the potential

11
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

hoax of pandemic. On the other, hand, it is argued that because of the

installation, which began over a century ago, of the unequivocal
absurdities mimicking science, as a tool of destroying the confidence in
the reality of truth—a destruction, comprising the prerequisite of
destroying correct thinking—the advertised “new normal” that is said
by its advocates to arrive in the post cov-crisis world, is, in fact,
nothing new as a global menace. The world which the post cov-crisis
will find will have been shaped in the course of a whole century of
brainwashing. The above-mentioned partial absolute truths
concerning public health, discussed at length further in this book,
reveal more and more the cov-crisis as an artificial creation for
redirecting the world into the abyss prepared by the tiny super-
wealthy elite—a state which the cov-crisis, after it wanes, will find to be
in place, ready for the world to act exactly the way the elite wants it to.
WHY SHOULD ONE BE INTERESTED IN
THE MATTERS DISCUSSED IN THIS BOOK?—If nothing
else, it should be obvious purely pragmatically, that knowing the
truth as much as possible, helps plan your life. To say the least, it
would help one to vanish his amazement when he suddenly sees
everyone with a face-mask in the street, at least having some clue not
only from where this might have come about, but how legitimate
a concern that might be. Understanding that relativity is
absurdity may be a far cry from what his daily chores require, but
this time, hearing all this talk about a health problem that may also
concern his own life or death, this time he cannot remain a
side-observer, as is discussed in “PANDEMIC ON
A PERSONAL LEVEL—CRASH OF “I
DON’T PARTICIPATE” IDEOLOGY”. Who knows, it may
happen so that seeing the importance of understanding the
truth regarding such down to earth problem, related to personal
life or death, may give him a hint that knowing the truth
about bigger problems, beyond one’s little life, may also make sense.

12
 Crucial Fact
-
A book concerned with the fate of humanity has no other choice but to
begin with the greatest destruction of human thinking ever, induced by
the iniquitous global admission that absurdity such as the theory
of relativity is genius science.
The utmost problem humanity faces is the destroyed science
through relativity. The demolition of science is specifically designed
to have the world brainwashed that there is no truth and in this way to
deal away with thinking. Thinking, let alone quality thinking, stands
in the way of a handful of very rich but mostly mediocre
individuals, who imagine that they are messiahs.
Decimation of thinking, as the central, deliberately incurred
defect of our day, reflects adversely on every aspect of our
lives, including the quality assessing, independently of someone
determined to manipulate, whether or not alleged pandemics or
purported anthropogenic climate change are real phenomena.
It must be admitted, however, that the mentioned turbo-wealthy
elite, albeit mediocre, has accomplished its destructive goal perfectly (it
is easier to destroy than to build, especially with the kind of money
they have)—the very fact that the world is coerced to
vigorously celebrate on a widest possible global scene for over a
century the most obvious, immediately debunkable hoax, known
as relativity (cf. Addendum), as the creation of a genius, is the reason
for anyone to shut down his ears and eyes to any possible official
information channel whatsoever.
The destruction of thought through decimation of science, thus
removing the reality of truth from society, as undemocratic as such act
is, was a century-long process, which has slowly eroded society and the
revealing of that erosion through more or less elaborate
mechanisms, such as freaking out the world using the specter of
pandemics or other scares, is of secondary significance. This alert
about destroyed science pervades throughout this entire book, which,
in addition, provides a tool to discern the shaky character of one
of these secondary means—the cov-pandemic—the elite uses
for undermining society.
Over and above all this, there is the one singular glaring example,
strongly emphasized above—the ignoring by society of the absolute

13
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

truth about the absurdity of relativity. Everything starts there. This

ignoring, if it is kept on, indicates why our society has no future.
Anything that can be said about the rest of the views of this
author breaks down when hitting the iron wall of the unequivocal
proof discovered by this author, protecting the truth that relativity is
absurdity (cf. Addendum). Nothing can undermine this absolute truth.
Any opposition to the debunking of relativity immediately
exposes those who oppose as the real promoters of the theory of
conspiracy. Thus, the so-called “conspiracy theory”, when referred to
the debunking of relativity, is exposed as something that
declares everything inconvenient but true, to be labeled as a
conspiracy theory. Consequently, the so-called mainstream
media, promoting the absurdity of relativity as genius theory
is, in actuality, the real conspiracy theorist.
ACCUSER IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES BREAKS
HIS VILE TOOTH IN RELATIVITY—Any advocate of the
absurdity known as relativity will break its poisonous fang in the
unequivocal proof which the Addendum demonstrates.
The unequivocal discovery made by this author; namely, that
relativity is absurdity, liberates humanity from the decimation
of the most important notions in science, time and space, which also
form the very basis of philosophy. In view of its
incomparable fundamentality, the absolute proof provided by this
author that the rate of time is the same in all coordinate systems
and that the real physical space can only be Euclidean, has a
significance for humanity no less, and probably even greater,
than a discovery of such prominence and impact, as the
discovery by Copernicus of heliocentrism.
The absolute primacy of the debunking of relativity as the first
class discovery, stems from the fact that not only is it unequivocal, but
like nothing else, especially of this much global magnitude, it is
immediately establishable by practically anyone, without losing even
one iota of rigor. Therefore, every time relativity tries to raise it
ugly head, there is an immediate antidote—show at once the page
from the Addendum proving that relativity violates its own definition
and in this way invalidating itself, and there will be no more to be
said regarding the mandate to remove relativity from science altogether.

14
  Crucial Fact 

It should be clear that the debunking of relativity cannot be

a conspiracy, because it is an expression of an absolute proof.
The debunking of relativity can be used as a stepping stone for
tackling much more complicated global problems such as pandemics,
which, for the lack of unequivocal arguments which would cut off once
and for all the questions surrounding them, are a natural breeder of
conspiracy theories one way or the other.
If there were no affirmation of the absolute existence of singular,
indelible truth, which the debunking of the globally significant
menace, known as relativity, accomplishes, there will always be a
sense of uncertainty and hopelessness when facing major global
challenges. The feeling that it is impossible for one to understand
whether or not a purported event is real but instead he must always
believe and rely on what he is told (usually lied to) officially, is
devastating to the human confidence. Unequivocal debunking of
relativity, which everyone can check individually, empowers the
person with the confidence that he is a greater master of his fate than he
usually thought. This empowerment allows the individual to seek the
truth by using his own devices and liberates him as much as possible
from the suffocating clutches of the manipulative, outright
shamelessly lying media.
THE CENTRAL PROBLEM AND ITS BIFURCATIONS—
This book will not cease repeating that there is one major global
factor which determines all the problems of our day. The major factor is
the decimated science, specifically by contaminating it with the
absurd relativity as well as quantum mechanics. The problem of
decimated science bifurcates in this book, as an illustration, into two
sub-problems—cov-pandemic and anthropogenic climate change,
which even if liberated from their political sheath, still comprise
difficult to judge problems even in terms of their reality. The
problems such as those of the two examples are further aggravated in
addition to the decimated science but also with the advancement
of the triviality known as internet. The seeming chaos of
information and the impossibility to find the steady shore of truth, is
becoming almost physically painful.
This book provides the machinery to break conclusively
through the cloud, hovering over the myth of greatness of relativity,
proving its utter scientific poverty, as well as lifting the edge of the
curtain covering the reality of the cov-pandemic.

15
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Thus, rather than as a tool for a “great reset”, the purported cov-
pandemic event can be turned around and can be recognized as an
opportunity to observe the reaction of society to unequivocal evidence
which concerns everyone individually.
PEER-REVIEWING EXERCISES ARE DOOMED TO
FAIL—The absolute proof that relativity is absurdity is not prone to
peer-review. The need for peer-review is a sign for the lack of scientificity
of the conclusion proposed. When a conclusion is unequivocal, it is
scientific beyond a shadow of a doubt, teflon-tight against peer-review
and its corrupt nature that has lost all integrity. Conversely, if an issue
of questionable scientificity is accepted by the community, that can only
be done through peer-review, which stamps it out as confirmed real
science, launching it into the pool of debatable issues, issues which have
not reached its final form. The unequivocal proof that relativity is
absurdity comprises an absolute truth and that puts it beyond such peer-
reviewable scrutiny. Reaching non-trivial absolute truths of the sort that
brings down relativity, is very rare in science. That is why it is quite a
lucky circumstance for this author and for science in general to have
such an absolute truth at hand. It is like finding a pot of gold.
Furthermore, it has the additional bonus that it gives final answer
regarding the very reality of truth—the absolute unequivocal argument
proving that relativity is absurdity also proves beyond a shadow of a
doubt that there is truth, that truth is real and is not solely a metaphor or
interpretation; that is, truth is not just a point of view. This gives a
categorical answer to ages-long search in philosophy of the problem of
truth. It needs to be noted here that philosophy is incapable of
determining truth concerning objects in the external world by using its
own devices. That is why philosophy is a deficient area of human
cognition (cf. also “DEVASTATING EFFECT OF INFUSING
PHILOSOPHY IN SCIENCE”). However, even philosophy does not
go against formal logic. It does not tolerate internal contradictions and
absurdities and therefore relativity cannot be saved even on the
account even of philosophy, otherwise infinitely tolerant to all views.
Now, that we know that truth exists, that it is real, philosophy
should follow the example of real science and consider all philosophical

16
  Crucial Fact 

trends doubting truth defunct, leaving them in the waste basket of

history, never to be mentioned again in philosophy, perhaps with the
exception of mentioning in a course devoted to history of philosophy
that such a confusion used to exist in philosophy.
AGGRESSIVE PROPAGANDA OF
ABSURD RELATIVITY—AN EXAMPLE OF THE LONG
HISTORY OF THE MEDIA MIND GAMES—While the cov-
pandemic’s skewed portrayal can only be partially sensed, the
grandiose mass-media manipulation comprising the false imposition
on the world as genius science of the most unscientific, absurd
creation, called here relativity, can be caught red-handed in its absolute
falsity (cf. Addendum).
All in all, the skewed portrayal of the alleged cov-pandemic,
aligned to the interests of random super-wealthy individuals, shows
the worst side of the privately owned media. However, that illness,
the tendency to distort the truth, from which the mass-media suffers,
has been displaying itself even more prominently, and even in the course
of over a century, by the toxic promotion of the immediately
provable unequivocal absurdity of relativity. Therefore, the media
mind-games with the population have a long history. They do
not begin with the imposition on humanity of what appears to
be (judging from the pattern-evidence) a phony cov-pandemic.

17
 Introduction
-

The method of manipulation chosen by the elite, using an

inherently elusive public health threat, is especially nasty. The very
character of a claimed public medical disaster, such as cov-pandemic,
disallows anyone from coming up with a direct, upfront, clear-cut
argument, one way or the other, regarding the reality of the alleged
cov-pandemic, the world being entirely dependent on the
concerted propaganda control of several individual global
news agency private owners.
The pattern-evidence method, given in this book, is the most one
can personally lay hands on in an effort to obtain some clarity about this
imposed disaster. As absolute as it is, for the assessment of reality of a
pandemic, the pattern-evidence, unfortunately, also cannot give the
needed unequivocal absolute answer to that effect, compared to the way
the ultimate argument shown in the Addendum bringing down
relativity, incurs a deadly blow. However, the pattern-evidence argument
concerning the cov-pandemic at hand, although providing only partial
answers, is at a close proximity to such categoricity. The tenor of
the book is limited to the partial problem which a certain super-wealthy
elite Davos group is trying to impose on the world as a new
order, by exploiting the scare of cov-pandemic.
This book discusses this pandemic chantage, giving indications
that there will be no “great reset” in the sense this term is finding
citizenship these days, especially not due to the purported cov-pandemic,
because the weft of the purported new order has already been
woven throughout the course of many decades. The world will keep
going in the wrong direction, pointed out and installed long
ago by a disappearingly small number of private, very wealthy
individuals in control of humungous finances, capable of
imposing their whimsical private will globally, independent of
what methods they would choose to use. They may choose, for
instance, to use a pandemic, independent of whether real or
made-up, as a means to reach their goals. This is what they chose
this time. At another time they may choose to use something else.
This freshly-minted pandemic devastation, however, is only a

18
  Introduction 

detail of the massive devastation creeping out into society for over a
century, all of it gathered around one extremely toxic intellectual center
—the deliberate destruction of science by instilling in it absurdities as a
legitimate basis of science, all that aimed at crushing the fact, which at
least in science, was established as solid and indelible; namely, that truth
is unique and real.
After what appears to be an artificially boosted idea of
pandemic, alas, the world will continue to be mired in unresolvable
problems, the tools of made-up epidemics and pandemics further
aggravating them, unless it dawns upon the governments of the world
that the pivot of all the solutions is the restoration of the understanding
that truth does exist and that the only way to reach truth is to
liberate science from absurdities posing as science, by refusing to
fund these absurdities. The goal formulated this way sounds remote
and unusual compared to what is pounced on the populace every
day, creeping through the massive barrage of entertainment, by the
thousand horns of the mainstream media, as goals to achieve.
It is not so much because the population does not understand
science and considers it as something that is done only in centers
specialized for the purpose, as if the population understands economics,
the inner workings of politics and everything else it is being occupied
with, by loudspeakers, TV, or computer and mobile phone screens.
Quite the contrary, the reluctance to deal with the real problems of
science, apart from the infestation with pseudo-science to amuse the
masses, is because the media has no intention of enlightening the
multitude. The intention of the mostly privately owned mass media is to
confuse, dumb down, brainwash in given directions, serving the ends of
the super-wealthy elite, part of which owns the media. Therefore, a
prudent person would not rely on the media if he really needs to be
properly informed.
However, instead of taking the more difficult road—looking
for clues allowing them to personally understand what is true, possibly
personally finding absolute truths to serve them as anchors—many
prefer to just lie back and listen to the canned propaganda pouring out

19
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

officially. If one really wants to know and be sanitized from the anti-
science, freely flowing out of the official media, one will inevitably
bump, some with astonishment, into the fallen science of today.
As far as “thegreatresetters” go, I don’t want to even spell out
their names in this writing and will keep them nameless and faceless
because I don’t find that the regurgitating, as these “greatresetters” do, of
the well-known ideas which are held by the super-wealthy elite and their
questionable legitimacy as intellectual world leaders, comprises any kind
of contribution, least of all one worthy of credit. In addition, I should
say from the outset—the attempt to use the purported cov-pandemic as
an argument to subserve all the known one-sided economic views and all
the other derivative regrettable cultural and political views developed
through the decades, is disingenuous.
The problem of all “greatresetters’” analyses for the effect of the
purported cov-pandemic on economy, is that they present that pandemic
as a given, so that these analyses can appear to justify the questionable
thesis of “great reset”, obviously dropped on these “greatresetters” as a
talking point by powers, capable of wrapping up into a doctrine any
issue whatsoever that serves them and unobstructedly launch it into
international prominence.
This sneaky thing in the writings of pandemics doctrinaires, the
unquestionable adoption of pandemic as a “straw man”, as a given, as a
solid fact, allowing them to wave the “life-and-death” scarecrow, thus
preparing the atmosphere to discuss dismissively the issues of privacy, is a
demagoguery trick lining up with the best examples demagogues could
offer throughout history. In this way, the idea is being subtly interjected,
that ceding privacy may not be a bad thing. This kind of manipulation
has been tried periodically, one of the recent instances being 9/11, when
tightening of the control over the citizenry was surreptitiously made the
norm. At least the 9/11 devastation could be seen with the naked eye.
Using calamities, made-up or real, for political purposes, is not a new
discovery. It has been known and used for years. Now we are
experiencing a new modification of these methods of political control.
One really wonders how many more methods are we going to experience
in our lifetime, one more elaborate and puzzling than the other?

20
  Introduction 

IMBALANCED FACTUAL GOVERNANCE—At the

end of the day, this book talks about the weft on which
civilization grows and diverges along that growth. All
institutionalized and bureaucratic forms are shaped accordingly and
are only follow-up details. If that weft is crooked and suggests
corruption and breakdown of democracy as symptoms, fighting
the symptoms, trying to restore democracy and remove corruption
would be to no avail. The weft, the cause, will keep generating more
and more corruption and neglect for democracy. This will be a never
ending battle.
Until the times when super-concentration of wealth in
vanishingly small number of individuals is not addressed, the suffering
of the world will not cease, no matter how mighty a country may be or
how patriotic its ruler has pronounced himself. This drastically
imbalanced factual governance of the countries of the world is
insurmountable by any other way than by creating non-violent natural
conditions to cause its disappearance through changing the
groundwork of society.
This book cannot give the full prescription for how the entire
process to arrive at such bright future is to take place. However, it may
outline the first unconditional steps towards that bright and more
balanced future, the pivotal goal being the restoring of the
understanding that there is real truth. This restoring can only occur by
bringing science, the stalwart of truth, back to its rational roots and
mandatorily have science clean itself up from the suffocating absurdity
of relativity, entwining it for decades and decades.
EMPOWERING PEOPLE—The elite, having the
financial power to deceive and manipulate people in order to direct
them to its ends, is just about one of the most undemocratic things
there is.
In order to counter this kind of undemocratic imposition,
people must be empowered with the real power of truth. The
people must elevate their confidence to feel that they themselves are
able to understand even major problems of the world. In this way, they
will not allow themselves to be lied to and can take a firm stance against
the lies, no matter how insignificant each person is individually.
When many people see through the lies and deception, one day they
may make a difference.

21
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

This new empowerment will allow people to make a distinction

between “crystal clear science” and science which is only manipulatively
portrayed as crystal clear, but is not science at all.
Real science has very deep and complex problems, which can
be tackled only by systematically trained scientists. However, in some
major instances, when it is made so that practically anyone can
personally judge the truth, as is the case in the Addendum to this book,
the public, especially through its political representatives, may institute
an “additional layer of accountability” and prevent absurdities from
posing as science, by cancelling their funding. That, in addition to
helping society at large, would also help science itself, lest it is forgotten
that it is the people who foot the bill for science with their tax money.
This instituting of an additional layer of accountability is not
intervention of incompetents into the sacred territories of science, but is
quite a necessary house-cleaning, which science itself is incapable of
endorsing, especially when the inertia has formed comfortable cocoons
of collegiate subsistence, independent of the quality of the produced
science.
Discovering of crucial absolute truths and efficiently exposing
these absolute truths openly, must become public common property,
despite their desperate protection from becoming known to the people
—people must be empowered to be exposed to the truth and
understand that truth themselves as much as possible. The entire
twentieth century has been a travel into an intellectual abyss because of
the purposeful decimation of science, the stalwart of truth, which
makes it imperative that more people should make it a mission of their
lives to oppose that destructive tendency. It would not be redundant to
recall that this powerful call for bringing science back to the road of
truth, logic and reason is made because of the discovered unequivocal
arguments which specifically mandate such a call (cf. Addendum).
Such arguments as the ones presented in the Addendum,
aiding the understanding of phenomena of great public import, for
which otherwise the ordinary people have absolutely no way to be
exposed to, are more precious than gold. There is no greater problem
with longer term impact on society, yet allowing an immediate
resolution, than the continued destruction of science by relativity,

22
  Introduction 

which started at the beginning of the twentieth century. This

destruction should never leave the field of vision of any intelligent
person.
THERE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN ELITES BUT NOT
AS EFFICIENT—One may argue that nothing has changed
principally in the way society is structured. At all times there were
the likes of the Pharaohs, then the feudal lords and the monarchy,
always at the helm. Today there is a symbiosis between monarchy
and the uber-rich. Although the differential during totalitarian
times hasn’t been as drastic, the commoners were not allowed in the
territories of the elite of the time, and could not dream of the
privileges of the high ranking party functionaries. The difference
today is the demagoguery called democracy, elected officials and
all that kind of jazz—complete nonsense, which even the latest
events attest to, the “great reset” being only the icing on the cake of
all the travesty—the governing mega-wealthy elite, pretending to
defend democracy through evidently contra-democratic ideas, such
as the “great reset”, thinking that all people are stupid enough to
abstain from reading their almost explicitly stated totalitarian goals.
More on that will be said later in this book.
WHAT I LIKE AND WHAT I DON’T LIKE ABOUT
MY BOOK—What I like about my book is that it has an
insurmountable center, which cannot be challenged under any
circumstances and conditions, most prominently exemplified by my
unequivocal, absolute proof for the absurdity of relativity (cf.
Addendum). This ensures the core that will remain and continue to
sail through time despite the attacks of even the strongest winds of
criticism, winds which may make the sails of everything else that this
author has expressed, torn and ravaged. As an unassailable merit of
this book, one may also mention the pattern-evidence, shown further
on in this book, which, although not as powerful as the catastrophic
evidence bringing down relativity in its entirety, still has its indelible
role in the analysis of the reality of the purported cov-pandemic.
What I do not like about my book is that, in addition to the
indelible core, it also presents personal views of this author on issues
which are in their essence controversial, mostly because there is no
insurmountable center providing unequivocal proof either way about
these topics. However, if our conversations are to be based only on

23
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

incontrovertible truths that can be proved unequivocally, then the

world will be a pretty silent place. Of course, although such silence is a
pretty morose thing, the most pleasant noise for the intellectual ear is
the din which nevertheless stems from the steady grounds of reason.
Notably, when it comes to relativity, there can be no noise or
din about it, because there cannot be any further conversation about it
at all—relativity is unequivocally confirmed absurdity (cf. Addendum),
which excludes it outright from any conversation, least of all a scientific
conversation.
On the other hand, the conversation about the cov-pandemic,
a factor purported to stimulate the coming to life of what is presented
as “great reset”, cannot be anything else but chatter. This chatter will
have a more pleasant direction for the intellectual ear, making more
sense, when it has as its basis the absolute truths pertaining to that cov-
pandemic, absolute truths discussed further down in the pages of this
book.
“Thegreatresetter”, on his part, does not carry out a
conversation about the reality of the purported cov-pandemic, but
accepts axiomatically that the cov-pandemic is real, and uses it to build
around it his thesis regarding the “great reset”. In this way, he can do
nothing else but beat around the bush when analyzing both the roots of
what is presented as a cov-pandemic and why that particular type of
pandemic should be the cause for the cov-crisis, which, on its part, is
said that should have been the cause for the “great reset” and the “new
normal”. There will be some discussion in the book on this topic as
well.
WHAT AUTHORITY DO I HAVE TO TALK ABOUT
TRUTH?—Many will be asking, upon cracking this book open
(figuratively speaking), by what authority would this fellow dare come
out of the woodwork and teach us anything about the pivotal
ideological basis known as the “great reset” of the regime which was
imposed on everyone since the beginning of 2021. Not to mention the
power this person has appropriated, not only to talk about, but also to
demand the overthrowing of the basic scientific theory that has defined
the entire twentieth century.

24
  Introduction 

The real authority, the real credentials a person really has, when
he braces to talk about topics like the ones mentioned, do not
come from somewhere else, neither do they come from some
institution, but from the facts he presents. In the case at hand, these
are discoveries made personally by the current author, which
makes him even more authoritative, not that I don’t have “real”
scientific credentials.
In this respect, my unequivocal proof shown in the Addendum,
that the so-called theory of relativity is absurdity, is the exceptional
shining example of an absolute conclusion, incomparable to anything
else, bringing down the most important question of global public
significance throughout the entire century, that provides the ultimate
“credentials”. Failure to act on this critical problem, very easily and
rigorously debunked by my discovery in question, makes actions
on anything else inferior in quality. With relativity and progeny, allowed
to stay and mercilessly ravage the billions and billions of dollars in
public wealth, stolen from society under the deceptive guise of being
spent for science, any time when any problem of global significance
whatsoever is offered for tackling, there will always be the question—
why is the most grandiose, yet easiest to resolve problem, the
problem concerning relativity, still allowed to poison society? Why are
relativity and progeny still allowed to tyrannize society with their
absurdity, squandering in the process billions of dollars?
The resolution of this most important global problem is never
seen in any writing on the “great reset”. This poses the entirely legitimate
question—if the “great reset” is really worth its salt, and really cares to
improve the world, then why has this “great reset” foregone the solving
of the most burning public problem of all time—the ambush of science
by relativity and progeny?
The case of relativity was a fortuitous, lucky
circumstance, which allowed immediate unequivocal debunking of
a question of immense global century-old impact. The reason why it
was so easy to bring down relativity is probably because it was a purely
human creation, not by the best intellect, at that.
When it comes to the main topic of this book, the question of
the “great reset”, as presented in the texts of “thegreatresetter”, has an
inevitable connection to the complexity of the medicinal phenomena,
which in the area of public health are prone to yet additional
complications, uncertainties and many more unknowns. Therefore, the

25
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

student of nature, to say nothing of the occasional observer, who, in

addition, also has evident vested personal stakes as a human being in
becoming clear about the reality of a purported pandemic, will be
extremely lucky if he can be presented with absolute truths related to the
reality of the pandemic, even if these absolute truths only provide partial
evidence on the matter. This turns out to be possible, and such absolute
truths in the form of pattern-evidence, albeit only serving as partial
evidence, are being presented in this book.
It is unfortunate that because of the complexity of medicine,
categorical answers about the living state of humans will always be
wanting. The only truly categorical, final answer, is given by the passing of
a person. Therefore, in assessing the public health situation of a country,
there is nothing more definitive and final than the total number of people
who have died from all causes. This is the most one can do if one looks for
an absolute certainty. Unfortunately, this provides inferior conclusions
compared to the absolutely unequivocal conclusion that relativity is
absurdity and must be removed from science. However, this is the most we
can do, evidence to that effect being scattered throughout the book,
considering the complex idiosyncrasies of medicine.
WHY DO I ALLOW MYSELF TO SELL THIS BOOK?—I
have always been reluctant to consider scientific activity as a means of
sustenance, let alone earning a profit. These take away the freedom of
thought and, as a rule, subdue the thinking to the interests of those who
pay you the remuneration. Scientific research not directed only by the logic
of science loses its meaning. Real science is vehemently adversarial to the
post-industrial idea of turning every activity of this kind, education,
healthcare, to say nothing of science, into business and a part of the service
economy.
Led by this understanding, I published the first book entitled
“Relativity is the Mother of All Fake News” for free distribution. It can be
read on the website timeisabsolute.org. The second, “The Pathology of
Relativity and Some Notes on the Theory of Science” will have the same
idealistic fate.
Now, I won’t get into detail as to how such idealistic scientist
should support himself and his family. One obvious answer is by being
independently wealthy. However, how many scientists can afford that?
Practically none. So, what do we do? If you cannot support yourself

26
  Introduction 

it is better and more honorable to just drop out of institutions and do it

privately. Selling one’s soul is the worst offense a scientist can commit.
Writing and publishing a book for free distribution is
completely unusual in the United States. With this third book, by making
it available on the market, it appears that I have already given up fighting
the post-industrial America and have succumbed to the quieter life of a
money-earner.
There was a time, when a friend of mine, who was then the
Chair of a department, called me abroad during my vacation, and asked
me to teach a Summer course. I had to return urgently to the United
States and before beginning the course, he asked me how much he should
pay me. I told him that I don’t want to be paid. I’m doing this as a favor
to him as a friend. Besides, I think professors have an intrinsic idealistic
obligation to the youth to transfer knowledge to them, which eventually
the youth, in their time, should do also for the next generation. The
reaction of my friend was as if I have offended him or something. Later, it
occurred to me, although I should have known it from the get go, that
such action of mine goes against the grain of all the collegiate. Professors
go on strike to demand raise and now some Vesco causes inflation of their
demands. At the end of the course I got a very generous check, but what I
really took away from teaching that course was something much more
important—one has to be very careful with these salaries because
everyone in a profession is intertwined with the others. A reckless act,
such as, for example, refusing remuneration, may undermine the interests
of many people. So much for the interconnectedness of this world, on
which there will be some more paragraphs devoted later in this book, of
course, in a seemingly different context.
Besides, says prof. Ciottone’s cousin Bob Tomasso: In
America, when you give away things or do not price them well, people
cease to value them. In other words, if you don’t value your labor, why
should we?
Anyway, this book is discussing a mostly societal problem, not
science. Had it been a book on science, I would still not have allowed it to
be put on the market. I know that this poses a problem with regard to the
dissemination of science but this is how I feel. One may ask, suppose that

27
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

prestigious publishing houses such as Oxford University Press or The

University of Chicago Press suddenly decide to publish your scientific
texts (don’t hold your breath!), what are you going to do—at the end of
the day, they are commercial organizations? I don’t have the answer to
this question, neither will I face this question, ever.
Another question, which arose when I was pondering the
launching of this book into the commercial waters, was, what am I going
to use the proceeds for? Now, this is a pretty presumptuous question
because there is no evidence that this book will earn even one dollar
when put on the market. However, one must feel prepared for disasters
and cataclysms, so I’d better give it a thought, I thought. Firstly, it
occurred to me, that the dollar that I would earn from selling the book
will go for charity. On second thought, when thinking what charity that
might be, I realized that what I’ve been doing the past years
together with professor Judith M. Ciottone, is charity par excellence
—setting up and being the director of a New York Sofia Institute,
licensed by the New York Department of Education, after going
through all the meanders and expenses of a blind peer-review to ensure
the Curriculum, teaching students free—that was an act of pure
charity. This Institute kept going for a number of years. In recent
years, a number of press-conferences were given both in Washington
and in cities of Europe, which were also paid for as a charitable
undertaking to enlighten the world about being taken in to pay for
absurdities. When I thought back, there was hardly any activity in
which I have been involved, especially during the past decade, that
hasn’t been a charitable activity of trying to bring to the attention of
the world how wrong it is to give billions of dollars or euro in
support of brazen absurdities, charlatanly, corruptly portrayed as
science. And, in my mind a plan began to emerge—why don’t I
finance additionally with the proceeds from a book, meager as these
proceeds might be, these charitable events, the press-conferences, the
trips to Washington and Brussels for talks with politicians, trying to
convince them to come to their senses and cancel the funding of
absurdities with our tax money. Well, like I said, these proceeds are only
in my mind. Furthermore, such proceeds, even if there were such, would
in no way alleviate the sad fact that in the real world, one cannot do one

28
  Introduction 

thing only relying on the power of mind, having not a penny in his
pocket, let alone, shame or no shame, admitting that even this book,
which you, the author, finally succumbed to allow it on the market, hasn’t
made a sale. There are other factors at play for this sorry plight of an
author, but we will not go further into them. It may also be worth noting
that there are things in life, which are not paid for. No one pays you to
have integrity. Lacking a sponsor to pay for you to be honest does not
mean that falling into dishonesty is OK. Service economy of post-
modernism fails in this most important feature of humanism and history
knows more than one example, whereby someone true to his principles
was ready to be in gaol all his life or even burn at the stakes.
This book deals with the opposite case. It is dealing with ill-
conceived world-changing ideas, generated by individuals with money,
who actually do efficiently put in place and take down presidents of
countries and who can overturn the course of entire history, but which in
their mediocrity as ideas, are such that, under normal circumstances, one
would’t want to engage in, even as a chit-chat.
THE JEOPARDY OF THE PUBLICATION
CONUNDRUM—There is a major question concerning the
dissemination of truth in a published or any other form. The proper
publication, especially of scientific findings, is through the archival
scientific literature. This is a completely protected territory of
monarchical type, which is beyond the reach of the commoners, of their
opinions, commentaries and internet activities, let alone hate. Academies
themselves are the creation of monarchs and the protection of their
publishing world goes along with that origin.
Curiously, no matter what power the financial and industrial
Davos type elite has on society, in fact, governing it altogether, the
territories of academia are closed for it. This elite respects for purely
psychological reasons that detachment from academia and goes along
with any caprice or whim of that awe-inspiring sacred world of academia.
That whim may be the most unacceptable absurdity, such as relativity,
but the elite will go along with it. One reason, of course, is that the elite
does not have the abilities to understand the topics and, as a consequence,
it turns into a full intellectual slave of academia. The elite is a slave of

29
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

academia even if the problems are reduced to their level of

understanding, simply because it is elite’s conviction that whatever is to
be listened to must come from academia and from nowhere else outside
of it, thus allowing with the greatest accommodation for “the fox to
guard the chicken coop”. Another, deeper reason, which goes along the
homogenization of society, discussed in this book, desired by the elite in
its skin-saving panic, is the decimation of the academic elite by forcefully
dumbing it down, alongside the rest of the population, by forcing it
through the command of the money supply, to accept nonsense as
something sensible, worthy of being considered science—the intellectual
elite may not accept you amongst its ranks but have your hand on the
money tap, and you’ll see how that intellectual elite twitches at every
turn of the faucet. The monied elite cannot afford allowing a competing
intellectual elite, which would undermine it by real scientific analyses,
and will inevitably expose the spoiled intellectual essence and the overall
mediocrity of that monied elite.
As a matter of fact, allowing “the fox to guard the chicken
coop” mentality, is also the behavior of the commoners, the members of
the non-monied multitude at large, who consider authority only for its
being authority, as the source of truth, without these commoners having
a clue or even willing to have a clue about the real state of the matter. It
is always easier to relegate thinking to some authority, ignoring the fact
that, in this way, that multitude of outsiders is begging to be enslaved.
Thus, said commoners only wait to have whatever one wants to
come across to them, but unprotected by the sanction of the authorities,
to mangle mercilessly that unsanctioned uttering, as any mob would do,
reluctant to listen to any arguments, no matter how true and crucial
these arguments are, if at all capable of comprehending these arguments.
Thus, anyone who decides to self-publish out of the protected territories
of academia, exposes his creation and his reputation to a great risk of
being attacked by ready-set insignificant faceless executioners. They
know who you are, you do not know who they are. This is the name of
the game, and once you are forced to decide to go along the self-
publishing route, you voluntarily succumb to being lumped
together with myriads of other unfortunate souls, who have
decided, as a figure of speech, to put something down on paper.

30
  Introduction 

This will be the fate of this book and if that mob ravaging is lowering its
sales potential, so be it. My life doesn’t depend on the profits from this
book, while in harming it, these fellows, in fact, harm themselves. It is
their life that I’m trying to protect and it is their tax-money which I’m
trying to save from being brutally wasted by the lies that these tax monies
are going for great science, while, actually, they are pilfered in the void of
the absurd nothingness and nonsense. To say nothing of the fact that,
not even being qualified in the field of medicine, I am trying desperately
to dig out absolute truths on questions which also directly concern their
personal lives, thus, trying to free them as much as I can from the nasty
manipulations and lies of the elite, who prefers to keep everyone in
the dark and obedient. That the elite lies is proven unequivocally in
the Addendum. If the elite can so brazenly lie about such directly
provable nonsense of such global importance, only a very naïve person
may assume that the elite will not lie about everything else.
Thus, this book, published outside of the monarchical territory
of science, is an easy prey for the taking by any anonymous mediocrity,
which can be heard saying—“well, the proper journals did not publish
your dabbling because it has no merits”. Of course, if that mediocrity will
be brought under oath before the US Congress, especially regarding the
pivotal debunking of relativity shown in the Addendum, it will be sorry
for crawling out from under the rock for no good. Don’t hold your
breath, however. The US Congress is busy with more important stuff
than to be worried about squandering meager billions and billions of tax
dollars for funding absurdities. That allows the mediocrities in question
to have a field day and thrive.
One should also be clear that a text critical of relativity will
never find place on the pages of the academic publishing, although even
someone out of his wits but with half a brain will immediately see from
the Addendum how insane said relativity is. The confines of science work
similar to some judicial systems, whereby even if unequivocal evidence
for the innocence of the convicted is found after the verdict, the verdict
stays unchanged. When the coup d’état of nonsense has
succeeded to take over the hermetic confines of science, nothing in the
world is capable of extricating that foolishness. I wonder whether even
the billionaires with their money would be able to buy the private

31
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

publishing companies governing the territories of proper scientific

publishing, if it suddenly dawns on these billionaires that it is important
to correct science by chasing out absurdities, correcting which can only
be done by owning the pivotal science publishing companies. Not that
even if there is a chance of such dawning, a billionaire will act on it,
because, as already mentioned, it is the muddling the minds of the
academic elite that absurdity can be science, that is advantageous to the
monied elite, thus removing the intellectual elite as a competitor for the
job of leading humanity.
How about offering the book for publication to the big
publishing houses. Indeed, that will also ensure protection from uncalled
attacks of the lurking random mediocrities infesting the world outside
academia, let alone that it will bring prominence to your book. However,
by publishing it in this way, you are not really free because you have to
comply not with your own conscience but with the company’s policies,
oriented towards maximum sales, i.e. profits, which the expression of
some controversial opinions will not be of help. This very fact is a
deterrent for the one true to freedom of thought, even if there are other
controversial theses that would increase sales.
Besides, contacting of proper publishing houses has become
indirect, only through literary agents, and that is ridiculous. Just to note,
although anyone can register a commercial entity announced as a
publishing house, a proper publishing house has to have published at
least four books, existing in the holdings of at least a thousand libraries, if
I remember correctly the distinguishment which the Library of Congress
makes lately between a self-publisher and a proper publisher (these are
my terms, the LoC calls them differently).
Even the cov-crisis will not have any effect on opening the
Davos elite’s actual access to the sanctified territories of science.
Paradoxically, this determined by wealth elite, gathering in the Swiss
town of village type called Davos, as much as it is shaping up the present
and the future of the world, will always be sniveling paupers outside the
gates of the castle of science, as are the politicians whose handlers this

32
  Introduction 

elite is. No wonder why, then, even the most drastic political changes
throughout the twentieth century that took place, left science, as
defiled as it is, unchanged. All ideologies that were occupying the
world at one time or another during the past century, even those
warring ideologies which were viciously fighting with each other to
the blood, subscribed and are subscribing to this day, to this same
absurdity, deceitfully advertised as science (cf. also “DESTROYED
COMMON GROUND OF IDEOLOGIES AND THE
GREATEST DISCOVERY IN SCIENCE”).
Thus, none of the warring ideologies, leaving untouched the
absurdity foisted as science, could prevent the undermining of society
subversively taking place through undermining academia. There is a
cognitive battle, a battle between reason and absurdity, taking place on a
higher level than the visible clashes of ideologies which any sort of Davos
elite sniffling at the gates of science can command. So far, the upper hand
in this higher cognitive battle belongs to absurdity and the world will see
no day of hope if that situation is not reversed and the governance of
reason is not restored.
Unfortunately, aside from its unacceptable totalitarian
utopianism, the proposed “great reset”, subject of discussion in this book,
also doesn’t pertain at all to the world of science, the world exactly where a
great reset is crying out loud to take place. There is one simple,
immediate solution for such indeed needed great reset—stop the public
funding of the projects, such as relativity and progeny, pretending to be
science but are in fact absurdities. The first easy step to accomplishing
that goal is the inclusion of one sentence in the US Congress legislation.
This is discussed elsewhere (cf. my book “Relativity is the Mother of All
Fake News” published on timeisabsolute.org). In addition to liberation of
the American people from the tyranny of a monstrous absurdity, eating
up the wealth of the nation, harming its intellect, such an act of the US
Congress will also prove that not all of the power belongs to the monied
Davos-type elite, but that the decisive say when it comes to pivotal
matters, is in the hands of the people.
ACADEMIC FREEDOM—In connection with the above, it
may be appropriate to say a few words about “academic freedom”.
“Academic freedom” is a misnomer and an oxymoron of sorts. There

33
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

cannot be academic freedom when there is a curriculum, which the

professor must abide by. This is the “paradigm” (a pejorative term when
real science is concerned; the term “paradigm” must be disposed of in
any context) in an educational institution and this is the way it should
be. The detrimental role of the collectivistic term “paradigm”, a
brainchild of the post-industrial, post-modern world begun in the
nineteen sixties, is discussed at length in my book “Pathology of
Relativity and Some Notes on the Theory of Science”.
Thus, a professor stands to be sanctioned only if he does not
abide by the curriculum and teaches ideas or topics alternative or
unconnected with the curriculum. At that, judging the professor must
be in the power only of the dean or the governance of the university.
Student concerns must only address the syllabus which the professor has
given his students. Here we will not discuss the harsh decimation of
academia by including it, together with healthcare, in the “service
industry” of the post-industrial society, turning these precious elements
of the western civilization into business, with its harsh faceless realities of
treating it exclusively as a profit-maker. The question of the
inappropriateness of converting healthcare and education into “service
industry”, severely damaging them, is an extremely important topic,
which deserves a separate dedicated analysis, although the devastating
turning of education and healthcare into service industry will be
mentioned also in another part of this book. In this book, it must be
prominently stated that the “great reset” favoring post-industrialism, on
the contrary, favors this destruction in the form of turning education
and healthcare into service industry and encourages it—you will never
hear “thegreatresetter” oppose the exuberant profits the pharmaceutical
companies make from vaccines against cov-pandemic, even if that cov-
pandemic turns out that it is not imagined at all. Likewise,
“thegreatresetter” does not reject the idea, but quite the contrary, openly
states that education and healthcare are job-creating industries, albeit
with changed business model under the “great reset”, only transferring
their control to the government. Later in this book, we will see what
kind of government control that is, now just mentioning as a heads up
its vicious totalitarian essence, beguilingly disguised under good

34
  Introduction 

intentions. Genuine, proper education, is never a service industry and

the students are not customers, the way proper hospitals are not money-
making enterprises with patients, the buyers of their services. The
travesty, furthered by the “great reset” under a different guise, treating
students and hospital patients otherwise, thus destroying the very
humanistic fabric of civilization, must be opposed vehemently.
CULPRIT: ELITE→PROPAGANDA-OF-
ABSURDITY→CRUSHING THE TRUTH—We will be talking later
in this book more on the mechanisms and details concerning the “great
reset” but there is something over and above these minutae and that is
where the whole root of all this terrible historical state of the world lies.
The pivot is the governance of all aspects of our lives by the
super-wealthy elite in symbiosis with the western world monarchies and
the western clergy, that has tossed the idea of democracy as a chewing gum
to the external multitude, to those outside the inner sanctum of the super-
wealthy elite.
One aspect of this control is through the private ownership of
the media. When you privately own a large chunk of the information
media of the world and when several of your friends privately own the rest
of it, then the world is your oyster. And now, I will tell you why it is a bad
idea to have several private individuals own the source which informs close
to eight billion people—it is a bad idea to have the world information
media privately owned because, in this way, it is allowed to maintain
stupidities such as relativity as prime examples of high human thought. If
you don’t believe that the global media is spewing lies; that is, if you don’t
believe that relativity is travesty and degradation of human thought, only
take a look at the Addendum to this book. If you honestly make some
effort to understand what is in the Addendum, you may be amazed and
appalled that such absurdity could have ever been allowed in science, let
alone elevated to becoming the defining concept of the twentieth century
as the greatest achievement of science.
On the other hand, it does not take much to figure out that
when your attempt to install your totalitarian governance, serving the
super-wealthy elite through a Nazi regime failed, you had to look for
another variant of totalitarian control, you invented the Soviet regime.

35
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

It also failed, but unlike the Nazi regime, it allowed for several
individuals to steal, through a sudden change of system, what the slaves
have produced for over seventy years. The paradox is that these several
post-Soviet individuals, with their super-wealth matching the wealth of
the Davos elite, did not actually enter that Davos elite club of the super-
wealthy governing the world, but that is another topic of discussion.
The important thing for us now is to note that the Soviet variant of the
elite to install permanent totalitarianism aiming at serving elite’s
insidious goals of world dominance, also failed. Therefore, the
elite had to invent yet newer, more sophisticated variants of totalitarian
control, which hopefully will ultimately cement that control
forever. It appeared that post-industrial, a.k.a. post-modern, society
should be the solution. The slow installment of that idea, to
prevent resistance that could arise from the shock of too sudden an
implementation, took the super-wealthy elite almost sixty years.
Presidents that stood in the way were either removed physically or
various procedures, congressional hearings and impeachments by that
super-wealthy elite-installed cronies were applied but no one paid
attention. The overproduction of capitalism went about its business
and, as bad as it is, it continued to undermine the stay at the helm of that
super-wealthy elite, being there, at the helm, only due to the quality of
being super-wealthy and nothing else—the exact overproduction itself,
accompanying the rest of the ills of capitalism that made that elite super-
wealthy, began to stand badly in elite’s way. Therefore, it is not that
capitalism actually has ills and they must be amended to the benefit of
everyone, but it was the governance of the super-wealthy elite that was
being threatened by these ills and that is what called for a specific cure to
be invented in order to remove that existential threat to the
super-wealthy elite.
“CURE” TO SAVE THE ELITE FROM DEMISE—PART
1 OF 2, BINARY ARITHMETIC—The “cure”, believe it or not, is
contained in nothing other than, of all things, in the very essence of the
new sort of arithmetic—the so-called binary arithmetic, which allows all
arithmetic and logical operations to be carried out using number systems
having bases other than base-10, especially an arithmetic system having 2
as its basis—the so-called binary system (cf. also “ACCELERATION
OF HUMAN THOUGHT”).

36
  Introduction 

Credited to Leibnitz or perhaps to earlier studies by Thomas Harriot

sometime around the end of the 16th and the beginning of the 17th
century, the astounding discovery was made, not in the glittering
ballrooms of the royalty, but in the grim circles of the academic elite
(not the super-wealthy elite the subject of fierce attack in this book), that
instead of the easy arithmetic which uses numerals from 0 to 9, we
should do a simple, say, addition or multiplication (division and
subtraction too) of, for instance, two plus two or two times two, in a
most twisted weird way, expressing any number we know only by using
the ciphers 0 and 1 and, accordingly, apply a peculiar way to execute the
act of addition and multiplication (division and subtraction too). This
deliberately imposed complexity, however, dialectically evolves,
transforming quantity into quality, into a most beautiful simplicity
when an electric signal is considered as 1, while lack of electric signal is
considered as 0. Myriads of such simple latches are put together to carry
out much more than simple arithmetic and logical operations. Later,
that humungous assemblage of simple latches was harnessed in
further simple organizations of a place where these impulses or lack of
impulses were held frozen, just like a memory, and another place
where these impulses could trigger various serial, nowadays also
parallel, access to these myriads of frozen simple latches, some on, some
off. The so-called computer was born out of sheer simplicity—the
simplest thing one can ever imagine, based on the existence and the
non-existence of an event, such as an electric impulse.
This kind of numerical system ultimately contains by its very
essence the potential to be abused, making it today, in its foreseeably
developed variant, a tool of universal surveillance and follow-up control.
This new arithmetic, when unleashed for a no good purpose, has a
greater power of subduing humanity and efficiently exterminating it
than the power of the atomic bomb. This book, in its later pages, gets
into details of how this digital control, although elements of which are
existing even today, is intended to be implemented to tightly govern the
entire society. One important thing to emphasize here is the sometimes
immense potential the seemingly mundane discoveries of technical
principles has, which can be turned into flabbergasting technologies.

37
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Thus, one should not expect that a discovery should cause the football
field at MIT to explode, in order to demonstrate its significance, as were
the expectations during the days of “cold fusion”, if “cold fusion” were
to be taken seriously. Sometimes a discovered principle, described on a
piece of paper, has the potential to blow the whole world apart.
As discussed, aside from the purely academic profundity of the
discovery of the binary arithmetic, everything further, is quite trivial,
once it began to be felt as useful to the goals of the uber-wealthy elite,
and, as a result, its development was stimulated by that elite. Albeit, as
every development, it had to follow its natural growth of complexity. In
contrast, there are very profound directions which humanity needs, such
as the methods of producing “free energy”, but they are
counterproductive for the totalitarian goals of the elite. As a result, they
are not only not enjoying support or at least tolerance, but are
vehemently opposed by that super-wealthy elite, and therefore, are
doomed to pauperism and extinction. Financing of any serious scientific
endeavor can only come from the government. The government is put
in place to serve the interests of the super-wealthy elite. If the idea is
against that elite’s interests, even the brightest idea is doomed to be sent
to oblivion.
That binary arithmetic, which we call digital “cure” against the
undermining of the elite, even having reached a substantial level of
sophistication, was not enough as a harness and whip to goad the entire
population into the post-industrial pen. The multitude began wasting
the fruits of the binary arithmetic and boolean algebra for its own
entertainment, to say nothing of using it to disseminate entirely
unacceptable ideas subversive to the goals stated by the elite for
totalitarian control aimed at achieving collectivistic homogenization of
the world. The useless old bickering between political antagonists was
even amplified and everything again began going out of control.
“CURE” TO SAVE THE ELITE FROM DEMISE—
PART 2 OF 2, PANDEMIC—The elite had to come up with
something to add to the digital control, something really innovative in
its utter viciousness, that will make everyone pay attention; at that,
everyone adopting the suppression with joy and subordination,

38
  Introduction 

massively opposing anyone’s even attempt at dissent. There can hardly

be any other better tool, than the idea of a pandemic, real or imagined,
shoved down the throat of the billions by the global mass media, owned
by several private individuals. Once the billions of people are stunned by
the fear of the pandemic, the installment of any totalitarian idea,
especially an idea based on the already existing infrastructure of the
digital connectivity, becomes a piece of cake. This book will discuss at
length the reality of the purported pandemic and the pattern-evidence
serving as a signal showing that it may not be. Before that, as a matter of
the pivot of this book, it will be stressed once again why it is not a good
idea, rather, why it is an outright bad idea, to have the world mass media
owned by several private individuals. This was commented on above,
and because of its immense importance, it will be repeated here.
It is a bad idea to have only several private individuals own the
entire world system of information, because the whole world becomes
hostage of the limited abilities that common individuals, that have not
even proven how bright they are, distinguished only by their mere
wealth, impose their mediocrity on the entire world. The only ability
this super-wealthy elite has is to preserve itself, which almost always
happens at the expense of everyone else.
The world, however, consists also of great talents, if not geniuses,
who under such system remain unheard. Some of them, chased by
poverty, are even forced to sell their talent to service the mediocrity of
the elites. In this way, endowed with the power to govern the world only
based on their wealth, but actually having only modest aptitude, these
elite people who no one has asked to even opine about the worldly
matters, can pull the reins of the world society into territories of disaster
even without them understanding it.
Sure enough, it does not take long to encounter the case in point.
These several super-wealthy individuals and their heirs have mindlessly
allowed for over a century the propaganda of an outright absurdity such
as the pathological relativity and progeny (cf. Addendum) to be
insidiously portrayed as genius science and, as a result, to decimate to
smithereens the idea of truth.
The fact that the super-wealthy elite, allows for absurdities to
pass as science, by using its privately owned media, including the

39
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

privately owned most influential media shaping up the mainstream

policies in science, leads to the conclusion that said elite has the interest
to dumb down the multitude. Especially important for that elite is to
have confused the academic part of the multitude—academic “know-it-
alls” and critics of the status quo are the last thing this otherwise very
confused, but focused in its own greed and desire to rule, hyper-wealthy
elite, needs.
Besides, an objection to the above, in the sense that many of
the mainstream archival scientific journals belong to non-profit
organizations, is a non sequitur. The non-profit organizations are not
independent of the government and it is the elite who appoints the
government. Therefore, anyone who works at these non-profit
organizations and their archival scientific journals will think twice when
deciding to publish something critical of the established (ultimately
serving the interests of the elite) mainstream.
A proof that the elite has a direct interest in dumbing down of
the multitude is the very fact that education, in direct opposition to its
mission, is included in the service economy of the new world order
known as the post-industrial society. Turning an occupation into
industry inevitably shifts the focus of that occupation into one single,
very boring, anti-intellectual center—the bottom line. Once bottom
line governs, it inevitably sinks into oblivion concerns about integrity,
decency, real creativity and real science. If lies and cheating, if you can
get away with them, if denouncement of truth and anything else
immoral and unethical, if you can successfully conceal it, turns out to
be good for the bottom line, that would rule. Industry, business and
bottom line, once you let them in, begin to govern everything else.
Humanity, however, has territories which are intrinsically free from
intrusion of business interests and if matters in society are twisted so as
to let business in, as post-industrial thinking requires, that is a guarantee
for their demise. Human life, for example, cannot be traded on a stock
exchange.
One may suggest that the elite is tolerating and promoting the
nonsense presented as great science through the world propaganda of
the media it owns, because the elite itself lacks aptitude. If that is the

40
  Introduction 

case, pray tell, what business do such inept people have, to request
governing someone who unequivocally proves the absurdity of their
scientific propaganda flagship—relativity and progeny?
PANDEMIC ON A PERSONAL LEVEL—CRASH OF “I
DON’T PARTICIPATE” IDEOLOGY—Of course, on a personal
level, if we are facing real pandemic, the ideology of non-participation in
the matters of society, bringing oneself into inner emigration, goes out
the window. However, this ideology goes out the window not only
when pandemic is real, but also when society is made scared through
brainwashing and is forced to obey orders “without a single shot”; that
is, while living in the world of mass-media induced hallucinations. The
absolute data of the pattern-evidence hint at signs which point to that
direction but that is made invisible for most people.
Many are already forced out of the “I don’t participate”
ideology on their own accord, as well as under the pressure of their peers,
the fellow citizens. Upon tightening the totalitarian grip, the “I don’t
participate” ideology will become extinct.
This kind of pandemic-by-design through manipulation by the
mass-media, not necessarily by specially physically designing a killer-
virus in a secret military lab, would be the most desired, let alone
efficient, campaign, because it may be triggered at any time when
required by the political conditions, and can really penetrate into all the
cracks of society, which under different circumstances would not heed
one word under a different form of manipulation. The peculiarities in
the patterns seen in graphs as those presented in
Fig.1, showing differences, aside from bringing down the
propagated monolithic view for the reality of cov-pandemic, must be
explained, to exclude the just described manipulative scenario.
“BLACK SWAN” VS. “WHITE SWAN” EVENT AND
THE IMPOUNDING “WHITE WHALE”—When it comes to
“black swan” (unexpected event) versus “white swan” (predictable
event) analogy, referred to purported cov-pandemic, it may appear at
first glance that the alleged cov-pandemic is a “black swan” event. We are
told throughout the years, however, that humanity would inevitably be
attacked by a pandemic some day, therefore, the purported

41
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

cov-pandemic must be a “white swan” event—the spread is foreseeable

because almost the whole world is in motion, stimulated by the
impassionate commercial interest of the airlines. This particular event,
said to be a cov-pandemic, is a “white swan” event for a completely
different reason, also possessing certainty but not the certainty that
pandemics are inevitable, for the inevitability of which we need the
prediction of no organization or an individual. This event, presented as
cov-pandemic, has a completely different genesis.
This event came as the certainty of a needed trigger, shaped up in
this particular form of a purported cov-pandemic. That form was chosen
to be used, in order to speed-up, or even bring to completion, a political
situation which has been building during the last couple of decades, at
least, by the forces determined to dismantle capitalism through
implementing of far more subversive methods than by merely employing
methods such as the already old-fashioned “class struggle”, seen in plain
view, and therefore proved inefficient. For this reason, there is nothing
more efficient than the inclusiveness of a public threat such as pandemic,
whereby no one can stand on the sidelines, but is intrinsically, by its very
nature, coercively made a participant. Pandemic’s reality is undetectable
directly by the individuals and can be imposed centrally without the
possibility of recourse on the part of the population. Furthermore, if one
begins to notice unequivocal contrarian signs to the imposed doctrine of
absolute reality of the purported pandemic, he is very easily efficiently
silenced—the manipulated masses themselves act as quenchers. Moreover,
even experts agree that the methods of establishing the disease are
uncertain, even the symptoms can be confused. Other criteria are pushed
forward, criteria which are prone to rigging and manipulation. To name a
few, hospitals, being commercial entities, are paid to fabricate that deaths
are cov-related, the effect of the underlying diseases are minimized, the
general disturbance of the overall health system entirely neglected,
although that disturbance is the real, sure cause for the excess deaths from
the really serious, deadly diseases, compared to the times when the health
system is functioning. All that occurs, in addition to the mentioned fact
that the methods of establishing the coronavirus presence in the body are
uncertain. On top of it, medical specialists opportunistically know exactly

42
  Introduction 

what they are expected to say, in order to get ahead, let alone not to be
fired, the same way the “new normal” companies fawn to the new regime
“covenant”, and as a result get benefits.
There is more on this topic later under the heading
“FURTHER REPERCUSSIONS—ANTI-CAPITALIST
SENTIMENTS”.
SPECIAL ROLE OF COV-CRISIS—KEEP SYSTEM BUT
CRIPPLE IT—One element of the “great reset” is to use the cov-crisis to
reveal the great disparity between rich and poor. Well, any pandemic does
this. However, the cov-pandemic, real or not, imposed on the world as
real, is not only the revealer of the disparity but also an actor which pulls
the curtain for all to see the external cast out there, in the wide society
outside of the tight confines of the elite, a society at large, that is all set,
prepared to take portended real action. In the usual case, crisis just causes
additional devastation. After that usual crisis goes away, it leaves the
world to deal with the incurred disparities using its own devices. There is
no organized army in place, needed to make concerted efforts to
implement whatever road should be taken that has occurred in the mind
of its commanders, in order to close the disparity amongst
the dependents. In contrast, in the case of the post cov-crisis solution,
there is an organized army in place and the commanders of that army
do have a plan, albeit a peculiar one. The commanders of that army are
taking the easy way out, but a way that is serving them best—keep the
system as is, but cripple it with additional social programs, to say nothing
of additional mechanisms for even more elaborate corruption practices
and surveillance control aimed at shaping behavior which suits the
elite. How this concretely is done is described in the section “DIGITAL
FASCISM”. All that, as a reminder, is taking place only in the West,
because its big partners, created by this same West, have not even an iota
of intention to implement the “great reset” in their territories, reveling
at the additional advantage the self-loathing West is handing them on a
platter in the fierce geopolitical clash.

43
ELEMENTS OF THE “GREAT RESET”
Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset”

I’m hearing various versions and opinions of an idea known as the

“great reset” from speeches of parties such as the head of the
Catholic church or the future King of Great Britain, as well as by various
analysts. Slogans and notions such as

• “own nothing and be happy”

• digital currency

• universal surveillance

• investing in socially conscious stakeholder companies

and

• world governance

are rampant nowadays in the media. So, I decided to consult the

program documents on the matter. The result of this lifting the lid of
what comprises the “great reset”, is presented in this book and it does
not appear at all promising, if, deliberately or not, engulfed in the fog of
evident conjectures or outrightly frivolous conclusions, to say the least.
The authors of these documents are on a mission to convince us,
assuming as the unquestionable premise, that there is a real cov-
pandemic as the reason for the observed cov-crisis, inevitably followed
by a genuine post cov-crisis period, when something unusual, never seen
before, will take place. This unusual state, which the world will fall into
when the post cov-crisis commences, will not be a “restart” but a “great
reset”. The “business as usual” died with the cov-pandemic, is the
mantra which one hears regularly nowadays.

44
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

One might speculate that this was exactly the intention when
the bespoke-pandemic was instituted, using the instruments of social
manipulation, predominantly the mostly privately-owned world media.
It may be thought that the intention was to upset the system, which
would make it vulnerable to rigging, with one concrete November 2020
political goal in mind as a start.
Once accomplished, this November 2020 political goal would
pave the road for the achievement, as a long-term target, the wringing of
the arms of the world into a compulsory so-called “great reset”.
There is an ongoing desperate campaign to plant the idea of the
so-called “new normal”. This idea is contained in the term “great reset”,
as opposed to “restart”, which implies that when the purported cov-
pandemic subsides, the businesses will not return to the expected “old
normal”; that is, a state to which society always returns after crises,
but will enter a state which society has never seen before. What exactly
that unique “great reset” is, will become clear in later parts of this book.
Thus, not only is the origin of cov-crisis not tackled in a way for
the population to be exposed to unequivocal evidence, such that the
population at large could see and judge for itself, but enormous efforts
are being expended to convince society, without any direct evidence, only
based on low-quality conjectures and postulates, that the so-called post
cov-crisis period will comprise something never heard of and never seen.
The very starting points, the very evidence for the reality of cov-
pandemic, are laid in the hands of only a select group of obviously
careeristic experts of questionable integrity, ready to say anything to
achieve personal advancement. This obliging group of experts is extracted
from the entirety of the collegiate of experts, many of whom have
dissenting views.
This differs from the situation with relativity, whereby all so-
called experts are without exception corrupt—it was made impossible for
one denying relativity to even think of being in academia, despite the
catastrophic proof that relativity is absurdity (cf. Addendum), and
therefore has no place in science. Thus, when it comes to relativity,
declaring loyalty to the nonsense, submissively adopting the absurdity as
something reasonable, is beyond agendas and vested interests. It is an
existential matter of survival in academia. Obviously, the infinite

45
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

categoricity of the proof that relativity is absurdity, which absolutely

denies its place in science, had stiffened to infinity the resolve of those
who need relativity to stay in science. That resolve had made them not
only determined to take over all the governing power in science, but to
make it a deadly sin to cast even a shadow of doubt on relativity.
As can be heard and seen, slipping through the massive barrage
of controlled media, there is a demonstrable controversy even amongst
the mainstream medical practitioners when it comes to cov-pandemic.
The cov-pandemic problem is much more complex. There is no one-hit
catastrophic argument that can unequivocally resolve whether or not
cov-pandemic is real, as in relativity, and that gives a leeway for
dissenting medical views, which manage to pass through to society
despite the strict political censorship banning them. In relativity, the
situation is clear-cut. It is a “yes” or “no” situation, no in-
between. There is no controversy—relativity is unequivocally absurdity
and must be removed from science unquestioningly. Therefore, those
who, on the contrary, need relativity to stay put in science because it has
already dug a rut in coffers controlling politicians’s hearts, must be
matchingly resolute. The barrage, preventing the truth that relativity is
absurd, must be impenetrable and it has been made so on all possible
levels. It is a Berlin wall, protecting the falsity. Every attempt to cross
that wall and enter the land of freedom from the oppression of the
absurd relativity, is met with machine gun fire. Thus, you will
see organizations of mainstream medical dissenters but no
mainstream dissenters are organized to have a voice opposing
relativity seep out in the media. Indeed, there are some loose
amateurish gatherings of physics mavericks but they are mostly an
exotic addition to the colorful milieu of the various far out
California-type weirdos, with no impact on society whatsoever,
especially its funding potential.
Here is another important difference, however. While in terms
of suppression, the situation with the alleged cov-pandemic much
resembles the state of affairs connected with relativity in its smashing
ubiquitous intolerance of the mainstream to allowing correction, there is
one dramatic exception. When it comes to relativity, any member of the

46
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

public can unequivocally verify personally that relativity is absurdity—

just consult the Addendum in this book. The ultimateness of relativity’s
demise is unmatched, dwarfing any other problem of global significance,
everything else, including the claim for the reality of cov-pandemic,
exhibiting varying nuances and levels of debunkability.
Having appreciated the above; namely, relativity being the
ultimate example of truth-resolution at practically everyone’s disposal,
this is the moment to mention that cov-pandemic, on the other hand, is
not a converse case; that is, the individual is not completely helpless in
his personal quest for truth regarding the reality of cov-pandemic. Thus,
unlike many other matters, such as, for example, the claim for human-
induced climate change, where there is no unequivocal evidence either
“pro” or “con”, in the alleged cov-pandemic case, the subject of interest
in this book, there are some unequivocal elements, elements which
cannot be disputed. These elements are dismantling the solidity of the
belief in the reality of the cov-pandemic as the cause for the observed
cov-crisis. Indeed, the absolute facts pertaining to the alleged cov-
pandemic are not catastrophically devastating to the thesis that the
purported cov-pandemic is real, as are the unequivocal catastrophic facts
in the case of relativity, providing the final answer; that is, unequivocally
proving that relativity is absurdity, but the absolute facts pertaining to
the alleged cov-pandemic are nevertheless quite telling upon more
thorough inspection. This pattern-evidence, as we have adopted to call
here the absolute facts pertaining to the purported cov-pandemic, must
be carefully examined, especially considering the extraordinary
importance which is assigned to said purported cov-pandemic. In
connection with this manipulative use of the alleged cov-pandemic, said
to be caused by a sort of coronavirus of unknown type, all elements,
even mundane details, must be re-examined, paying special attention
to the pertaining unconditional absolute truths.
Instead of devoting efforts to analyze the real source of the cov-
crisis, instead of finding out whether or not there is indeed cov-
pandemic causing the cov-crisis, “thegreatresetter” gets on straight away
with his futuristic predictions, which sound more like self-fulfilling
prophecies, as if “thegreatresetter” knows the future—in the so-called

47
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

post cov-crisis world (as if the cov-crisis world were caused indeed by a
genuine cov-pandemic and was not just a mass-media induced cov-crisis),
“thegreatresetter” makes the stunning discovery that the journey of most
companies will be, mind you, “challenging and sometimes treacherous”.
Of course, it is trivial to suggest that after even just any crisis, the journey of
most companies will be “challenging and sometimes treacherous”. How is
the alleged cov-crisis (real or media-induced) any different from any other
crisis? The whole world after the WWII was devastated, and it hasn’t
recovered intellectually to this day, still wastefully allowing unattended
large-scale taxpayer money support of ravaged fundamental science. Where
is that unequivocal fact, signifying a real fundamental existing crisis—
the fact that today’s fundamental science is ravaged—mentioned,
instead of regurgitating usual warnings about something trivially
expected as a result of a most likely simulated crisis? Parsing sector by
sector of industries, suggesting different extent of crisis effect, as
“thegreatresetter” does, brings nothing new to the table. Almost anyone
can tell that there would be such an effect, provided a crisis had been
around—some managing to cope while others struggling. That smaller
businesses will be hit harder by a crisis than the bigger ones, is a truism.
However, to offset that truism we are hit with another truism; namely,
that small businesses are characterized by greater celerity, therefore they
will adjust faster.
Why should the trivial questions such as

• remote working

• reducing air travel in favor of virtual interactions

• increasing agility of decision-making

and

• acceleration in digitization

which every company addresses after a modern crisis, or even during the

48
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

normal days of operation, should occupy special attention in

“thegreatresetter’s” writings, and which would define something as
dramatic as a “great reset”, rather than the usual “restart” in the post cov-
crisis period, is anyone’s guess? The world is on fire. Major disruptions
have been building for decades, when there was not a hint of cov-
pandemic, the greatest morass of all being the sequestering from society
with the help of deliberately broken, absurd science, of the knowledge
for the reality of truth, but “thegreatresetter” is blind to that. Instead, he
is pushing his trivialities as a substitute, hoping that somehow
miraculously a justification would emerge for some deformed kind of
world of “new normal”, the result of some imagined “great reset”. This
sort of “aparatchik”-born daydreaming is the process which takes place
in the imagination of the bureaucrat when walking down the corridor
from his office to the canteen, just like the “serendipitous” imagination
Gorbachov had during his lunch break, hitting him with the
“perestroyka” idea.
As any idea born in the office of an aparatchik-bureaucrat,
much less when it is born in the corridor on the way to the office
cafeteria, the “great reset” idea will share the same destiny as the destiny
of “perestroyka”. The ideas of career bureaucrats are non-working as a
rule and anything that comes out of them is stillborn.
Nevertheless, we have taken up to read “thegreatresetter’s”
text and we cannot help but ask—what is going on? To occupy the
reader with common after-crisis expectations just does not makes sense,
considering the widely advertised pretenses for a new word in world
governance. Is this usualness what we are set to read? Again and again,
why are we bothered with such trivialities? There must be something
behind it, one thinks in utter puzzlement. There must be something
around the corner which we are blindsided to see, while being
overwhelmed by these trivialities. Lo and behold, upon careful reading,
one finds that, indeed, there is such hidden agenda behind this smoke
screen. This book is a small effort to disperse the fog, as much as it can,
of the obfuscation hiding the sinister intent of destruction, if not global,
at least of the western civilization, by implementing that so-called “great
reset”.

49
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

CONCENTRATION OF INDIVIDUAL POWER AND

PATTERN-EVIDENCE—We will begin with mentioning something,
which will occupy a great deal of our attention in this book—the
pattern-evidence. When looking at the pattern-evidence, the details of
which will be shown shortly, the portrayal that something unheard of
has come upon humanity in 2020 seems pretty suspect. Although
seemingly quite obvious, because the reality of viruses, and in this case of
the cov-virus, cannot be doubted in principle, nevertheless, the cov-crisis
may not have at the bottom the virus itself as the buttress, but may have
some other origin. For instance, the hype of cov-crisis may be fabricated
in the form of a deliberately media-induced excessive panic campaign
around a premeditatively concocted cov-pandemic—the media is mine,
says the elite, never mind that it even is heard globally, who’s going to tell
me what to use it for? Thus, it won’t hurt repeating—the mass media
having global impact, is privately-owned. That private ownership is
concentrated in the hands of only several individuals out of the almost
eight billion people living on Earth. Some of these several private owners
of global media empires have even direct political ambitions,
demonstrated quite openly. Concentration of so much power in
individuals only known for their wealth, who have never demonstrated
any creative qualities,

• never discovered anything

• never written a riveting novel

• never painted a chef-d’œuvre

• never composed a symphony

or

• created anything else of high aesthetic or intellectual substance

50
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

or made any other positive contribution to society, other than the boring
plainness of wealth, let alone being unelected by anyone—their national
political campaigns ending in disaster—but who may sway the political
process to their liking exclusively due to the money they own, is a very
dangerous characteristic of our time. How the situation has been during
earlier epochs is beside the point.
So, before serving these select individuals’ interests by skewing
the economic analysis towards a gloom and doom picture, as plausible as it
is for any pandemic at all, especially because any of the figures or opinions
of organizations listed are not checkable directly, the really
worthwhile neutral analysis which makes sense for an alert individual
to undertake, would be based on unequivocal criteria such as the pattern-
evidence plots. These plots may be insufficient for the categorical
understanding of whether or not the alleged pandemic is real, but it is a
good place to start because this is the only reliable evidence we have
in hand for direct personal inspection. The absolute reality of the
pattern-evidence cannot be disputed, even by, at times, quite vigorously
warring specialists, many of whom just opportunistically repeat
what is expected as politically advantageous for them to say, barring
all self-respect and professionalism as some useless burden. In this case,
once shown the pattern-evidence, none of these otherwise warring
specialists, even if some of them pander to the strong of the day,
would dare deny the obvious. As far as the opportunism of those
pandering specialists goes, it is aided by the uncertainty and plain
speculative character, to say the least, of the partial criteria used,
appearing to speak in favor of cov-pandemic, based on data, God knows
how it was gathered, presented publicly, propagandistically limiting
these data to just one of the causes of death amongst the many in the entire
mix of all possible causes.
On the other hand, forgetting for the moment the reality of cov-
pandemic, even if we are only interested in the effect of what is felt as a
tragic crisis, analysis of that effect must go through the possibility
to personally assess whether or not there is at all a purported public
health anomaly and the extent of such anomaly, if it is real, rather than
to listen and be scared to death by the media, personally owned
by the aforementioned several mediocre, on top of it unelected,
private individuals, trying to shape the direction of our lives to their own
ends.
51
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

I understand that even if one senses the manipulation, the powers

imposing their will are so great and mighty that no one can do anything
about it and can’t change one thing. However, at least, one would know
personally about the cheating and would not allow oneself to be
considered a complete fool, an easy prey for the fake news.
After mentioning pattern-evidence already several times, it may
be instructive even at this point to present an example of that factual
evidence. Looking at the pattern-evidence, even in its partial
character, not covering all the 195 or so countries of the world, one does
not become fully convinced that the word is not just about a world
panic, but is artificially stirred up by the world media, controlled by
the tiny Davos-type elite group, thus creating the cov-crisis, in the hope
that in this way this elite group will be able to catch the fish of the
“great reset” in the muddy waters of the created chaos and serve it to the
world.

Fig.1. Cov-data for several countries of the world

Thus, when looking at the sample of the most reliable absolute data
related to the cov-pandemic available for independent personal
inspection; namely, the pattern-evidence, we see that, unfortunately,
there is no categorical evidence for the claimed effect. Fig.1 presents
pattern-evidence, for total deaths from all causes, for a longer period
than the period analyzed in the figures shown elsewhere in the book—
those graphs, shown later in this book, are for a period which coincides
with the period for which “thegreatresetter” based his analysis. Those
figures will be discussed shortly.
52
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

Here, we will focus our attention on a set of graphs covering a longer

period than the period discussed by “thegreatresetter”. Thus, as seen
from Fig.1, although there is no intention to conduct a thorough
analysis here, even a cursory glance at the presented figure reveals great
variations in the behavior of what is portrayed as a fully developed world
health crisis. Firstly, at least 15 countries show no sign of a health
anomaly throughout the studied period. There are at least four
countries, specifically in South America, with very pronounced health
anomaly, which clearly differs in its character from what is seen in all of
the other countries. It is seen that there are countries which exhibit only
the April anomaly with missing November one. In other countries there
is both April and November anomaly and in some there is even mid-
Summer anomaly. There should be a more thorough study done at the
end of 2021, whereby the pattern-evidence from all the countries of the
world should be examined. However, even at this junction, it is clear that
a different kind of analysis must be carried out from what is offered to
the public now, not limiting the analysis to the questionable data
regarding the virus itself, but replacing those suspect data with the
pattern-evidence, having the absolute character of a criterion for judging
if there is health anomaly in a country.
PANIC BY THE POWER OF EXPONENTIAL
GROWTH—One common scare tactic during the first months of the
purported cov-pandemic was the announced terrible exponential
growth of the diseased that awaits us. Obviously, “thegreatresetter” has
bought into that without looking into it more thoroughly or maybe this
was just a device to stoke the desired effect of panic and fear.
Thus, interestingly, “thegreatresetter” puts a lot of emphasis on
what he calls “power of the exponential growth”. However, upon
inspection of the pattern-evidence plots of not too few countries (cf.
Fig.1), one sees not only no exponential growth of the deaths from all
causes but no growth at all.
Even in countries in which there were anomalies in the pattern-
evidence plots (the weekly number of total deaths from all causes plotted
as a function of time), these anomalies are showing themselves in the
form of maxima resembling the graphs of a Gaussian distribution
(except for some South American countries where the maxima appeared

53
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

wider and flatter at the top). Therefore, instead of the panic which
writers such as “thegreatresetter” instill by talking about the extreme
velocity of spreading the virus, giving the impression of some imminent,
ever growing and never ending calamity, we see that what happens in
reality, whenever there is anomaly, there is typically an anomalous burst
during the course of several weeks, after which the run of the curve goes
back to normal, difference in the character of these bursts seen when
comparing some clusters of countries notwithstanding.
Scaring people first and then telling them how badly the scare
will reflect on their lives, prepares everyone to accept easier the idea that
even when the threat goes away, life will never return to its previous
“normal”. Some kind of a “new normal” is awaiting them and it is for
the author—the speaker for those who have the global power—to self-
appointedly say what this “new normal” will be. People don’t even want
to know the details about what this “new normal” is. They are scared
enough, conditioned not to think, let alone doubt what they are told.
“Thegreatresetter” resides where the source of the scary news is. Who are
they, commoners and outsiders, to doubt him. Never mind that these
very people, the commoners and the outsiders, themselves may look at
the pattern-evidence data. It is available all over the internet. Some of it
requires a little effort and knowledge of how to present data in a
graphical from. However, they will not bother to learn how to plot data,
let alone applying some thinking, no matter how low a price to pay that
is, for taking one out of his misery of insecurity and fear. Obviously, it
takes much less effort to listen to someone else, who has taken upon
himself to summarize all that matters, never mind that, in doing so, he is
pulling wool over their eyes, over the eyes of these self-perceived
commoners and outsiders. This happens with the cov-crisis, and even
more shockingly, with the accepting as if it is science, of the sheer
absurdity which relativity is, despite the absolutely unequivocal proof
that it is nonsense, seen even here in this book, served on a platter in the
Addendum for anyone to inspect and comprehend. Most people will
keep staying in the fantasy world of their belief and admiration of
relativity till the cows come home, despite relativity’s burning
bankruptcy, not realizing that if absurdity were fire, then any

54
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

interaction with relativity would have caused such an inferno that would
have caused even their annihilation. Why, however, speak about
relativity, seeming distant and of no concern to their lives. The paradox
is that the feel for relativity of being distant and of no direct concern to
them is not the cause for their lack of interest. With the very same
apathy, they are reluctant to look at unequivocal data related to
purported cov-crisis, data which even concerns them personally. It very
well may be that people just feel helpless, even if they know what goes on
and that makes them inactive. Compliance is what pays the salaries. Case
in point—what difference does it make that we know, as we really do,
with absolute certainty, that relativity is the epitome of nonsense and
that it absolutely cannot derive E = mc2? Despite us knowing it and even
having this book at hand with its Addendum, which presents
unequivocal proof that relativity is absurdity, the world will keep going
with the bizarre idea that relativity is the greatest scientific theory there
is, that space can be curved and that time can pass at different rates in
different coordinate systems. No matter who may like such a world, I
don’t, and if there is to be a “great reset”, there must be the “great reset”
of chasing absurdities such as relativity out of science, never again
allowing for anything remotely nonsensical of that sort to ever invade
science. Only such “great reset” would place humanity on the
productive road which would ensure solutions of its problems, some of
which are threatening even its very existence.
INSURANCE OF PLAYING BOTH SIDES—On the other
hand, one also hears these same fearmongers taking precautions, just in
case, as a protection if they have gone too far or in case they get caught,
by touting that the looming disaster is actually not so devastating.
Thus, true to himself, “thegreatresetter”, preemptively playing
both sides of the game, interjects, just in case, hope into the doom and
gloom scenario. Thus, not only will people, confined to their
apartments, have written books, but new micro industries might as well
emerge. How much more simplistic can one get, in order to appear
trustworthy by conjecturing on the evident? The goal to make the world
convinced of the implausible “great reset” obviously requires sacrifices,
even if these sacrifices make yourself look trite.

55
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

The insurance of playing both sides always accompanies

dishonest manipulation, which has no real conceptual and veridical
anchor to hang on to. It is basically intellectually indefensible, the only
protection for it arriving from the power of the endorsers writing the
check. The victim is always the truth.
SLIGHT CONFUSION—FULL RECOVERY OR
“GREAT RESET”—It may be added, as a detail, that when one keeps
reading “thegreatresetter’s” text, one encounters at times some curious
moments. For example, it sounds quite peculiar, on the backdrop of the
whole ideology of what “thegreatresetter” postulates the economy and
the world would look like in the alleged post cov-crisis, to hear this same
“greatresetter” propose that there could be a full-fledged economic
recovery after the disappearance of the cov-crisis. Was it not that in the
post cov-crisis world, the full-fledged recovery of the “old normal” was
not to be expected and some “new normal”, with its specific
governmentally-directed peculiar restrictions of the laws of the free
market, will be inevitable? Well, for “thegreatresetter” this difference
may be a negligible detail of otherwise full-fledged recovery, but ask the
businesses with the governmentally twisted arms what their reaction will
be. It is not likely that they would appreciate such governmental
intervention in the free market, calling it a full-fledged recovery of
economy. And, again, the fact that improvement and even replacement
of the system may, in principle, be needed, but the clumsy way it is
proposed to be done by “thegreatresetter” will do more harm than good,
to say the least. Destroying the core of the functioning of the system, the
free market, without replacing it with anything working better,
assuming that the system may go on just as well as it is, but with a
limping, if not maimed to the core, governmentally-controlled market, is
just not clever one bit.
TRIVIALITIES OF ANY CRISIS EFFECT—As seen from
the pattern-evidence shown in Fig.1, there are questions regarding the
reality of causes which generated the cov-crisis, not the understanding of
contemporary virology that this particular virus, known as SARS-
CoV-2, indeed causes severe health problems. The latter is not
questioned. However, although the reality of the factors that caused the

56
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

cov-crisis is the actual major problem, and we talk a lot about it in this
book, we will forego it when discussing the “great reset”, since what
is known as cov-crisis, as we call it here, is also a fact—whether
legitimately induced by a specific kind of virus or fabricated with ill
political intent. Once this evident in-your-face fact of a crisis is
accepted, because almost all governments in the world have caused
disruptions, justified or unjustified, in the life of their countries, we
are faced with the already noted obviousness of the trite realities that
some businesses will benefit, others will hurt, more nimble will survive,
clumsier will suffer. So, what’s with this repeating over and over of these
trivialities by “thegreatresetter”, also making us repeat this question again
and again?
“Thegreatresetter” has provided us with tales about
industries which he thinks would be examples that would impress us
as resulting specifically from the cov-crisis. However, on the one
hand, how many times does it need to be repeated that these trivial
developments would have happened anyway in a crisis, while on the
other hand, there can also be no surprise, and this is no discovery at all,
that when locked at home, you will join the crowd of “on-liners”, who
would buy, receive medical advice or participate in online courses and
that will boost these industries. Boosting the educational industry in this
way would only incur real harm to education, as is discussed later, to say
nothing that, as also discussed later, it is countering the very nature of
education to turn it into industry, service industry, as the post-industrial,
a.k.a. post-modern, anti-neoliberal, “great reset” kind of society
requires. However, for now, for the sake of argument, we will go
along with the way “thegreatresetter” views education; namely, as
a specific industry—service industry—and would note that the
increase of revenue of the contemporary on-line educational industry
under any crisis, not only under the purported cov-crisis, is more than
expected, the already discussed cynicism of treating education as
industry notwithstanding. In other words, the cov-crisis adds nothing new
to the expected effects on on-line education from any crisis. The
peculiar thing with the cov-crisis, compared to other crises
caused by natural disasters, is that cov-crisis has at least elements of a
manipulated crisis. However, that apparent manipulation is
additionally regrettable, and therefore the cov-crisis can hardly serve as
an example for anything, let alone a stimulus of an extraordinary “great
reset” change.

57
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

ARTIFICIALLY INSTILLED PANIC—No less trivial is the

expectation that panic in society would be the cause of environmental
disruptions. Curiously, now, in opposition to what they were saying
earlier, the environmentalists concerned about these disruptions seem to
take an anti-science stance. However, what these activists mean by
“science” is not really science.
If these activists really meant science in need of denouncing, then
their first target would have been the unequivocally provable infection of
academia with the pandemic of nonsense, spearheaded by relativity. If
these activists really meant science in need of denouncing, then their first
target would have been the unequivocally provable most grandiose
squandering of money going for absurdities rather than to real science, let
alone the greatest travesty of science, destroying peoples’ intellect, and
destroying thinking on a most fundamental level. Had these
environmentalists and everyone else really addressed science, they would
have become aware that every discussion about science would be
hypocritical, to say the least, if it does not address first the funding of the
absurd relativity and progeny, falsely hailed as great science (cf.
Addendum), for which the United States squanders every year billions
and billions of dollars, alongside the destruction which relativity incurs on
the human intellect and thinking. It is unfathomable that such grandiose
problem of much greater impact on the world societies than anything else,
let alone being immediately unequivocally resolvable, is neglected in favor
of the never to be scientifically understood, one way or the other, the
uncertainty-ridden human effect on climate change. The cov-crisis and
other health crises of various other origins, will also remain unresolved if
the thinking of the world is not pulled out of the void of absurdity.
Therefore, immediate resolution by canceling funding for relativity and
progeny, at that an immediate unequivocal resolution incomparable to
anything else, is absolutely not unconnected with the rest of the grand
public problems. Quite the contrary, the destroyed most fundamental
notions, such as time and space, command everything else into incorrect
thinking, which is fatal for that “everything else’s” solution as well. The
mere allowing of the thought that absurdity due to the presence of absurd
relativity, qualifies as science, the mere allowing of the diseased thought

58
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

that thinking based on absurdities is some kind of higher, non-

intuitive way of thinking, destroys the very notion of truth.
Acknowledging this diseased way of cognition comprises the innate
prerequisite of incorrect thought. Because of the bad science allowed
and heftily financed by the leaders of society, there is massive opinion
that there is no truth, that truth is only interpretation, only a metaphor.
No society can advance if its population, especially its intellectual
leaders, have such kind of negligent understanding about truth.
WE’RE NOT HERE TO LEARN ECONOMICS—By the
way, we have not braced ourselves to read texts by “thegreatresetters”
with the intention to study the clichés of economics, as contingent as
labeling it “science” economics is to begin with, but want to understand
if cov-pandemic is indeed real and, even if real and indeed inducing a
cov-crisis, then why is that cov-crisis claimed to be so different from any
other crisis, that after it passes an overall revamping of the world, a
“great reset”, a “new normal”, would be established. Why is that new
“great reset” state to be established, not just have the usually expected
“restart”, bringing back the “old normal”, trivially characterizing any
post-crisis period, return to the world? Alas, most of what we are given
as an explanation, is some kind of brief overview of what effects societal
crises are expected, in principle, to have on the economy. Thus, in this
quest of ours, this daring succumbing to reading completely boring
usualness about matters such as supply-chains and the expected effects
of crises on them, helps not one bit the understanding as to why it is
exactly the cov-crisis that should be the singular agent set to bring about
the “great reset”. Who knows, it again crosses one’s mind, maybe there
are some deep secrets, encrypted in deliberately composed very boring
sentences. Reading even more carefully the sentences describing usual
things, makes things no better. However, finally, one somehow puts two
and two together, a result which “thegreatresetter” obviously resists very
much, preferring to remain mystifyingly not very well understood. In
the end, however, one manages to gather the gist of the underlying
appalling, in essence destructive, ideas. These ideas are discussed further
on in this book.

59
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

TRUTH IS THE LAST CONCERN OF

“THEGREATRESETTER”—Before getting into these ideas, there is
the topic I already talked about, that has been bothering me for over a
decade. Now, with this new cov-crisis encompassing the globe in need of
resolution, that really burning global problem, bothering me for over
decade, is raising its flag with a renewed determination. Here’s the thing
—long before the unsupported mantras and usual mental futurism for
the necessity of some grand scheme of revamp, presented as the “great
reset”—today’s talk of the town—I had demonstrated unequivocally (cf.
Addendum) that there is genuine crisis in physics, affecting the most
fundamental notions of our cognition, a matter of unsurpassed global
significance. This is what is in real unquestionable need of a great reset.
To this day I would really like to understand why is this latter, actually
existing, really serious global problem, ignored, despite its immediate
confirmability and despite its superior importance for the world,
instead, putting exuberant world propaganda-emphasis on the former,
the “great reset”, which is only an unsupported, ill utopian dream,
shared by a limited group of people?
After reading texts by “greatresetters”, the answer began to
appear ever so clear. What my concerns are, which are the concerns of a
scientist, are not the concerns of “thegreatresetters”, despite the global
character of both aspirations. “Thegreatresetters” care not one bit about
truth, and therefore they do not have to prove anything to anyone. The
elite “thegreatresetters” serve comprises an action of dominance and
control the elite imposes on everyone else, no matter how crude and
unsophisticated the ideas intended to endorse that dominance are. Who
is to judge the sophistication and the logical basis of your intentions
when you hold all the power? As for anyone else, outside of the elite
circle, the more muddled the thinking of the governed outsiders, the
better. Therefore, straightening out muddled science is the last item on
elite’s agenda, if not even specially stimulated by the elite. I discuss this
in other parts of this book.
MELVILLIAN IMAGE OF “WHITE WHALE”—The
cov-pandemic, alleged to be the factor causing the cov-crisis, is portrayed
by “thegreatresetter” as some super-force, which will change everything

60
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

for the better. All, however, is presented on a parochial petty bourgeois

scale, which is not only trivial, as already remarked, but is also self-
defeating. If nothing else, if implemented, it will not allow the United
States to counteract the big Chinese threat, in the various ways of global
competition, turning it into a “white whale”, weakening the defense
potential of the country by inappropriate, entirely politically motivated
installment of the ruinous sense of questionable pandemic
notwithstanding.
Treacherously ignoring all these threats,“thegreatresetter” has a
narrow obvious goal—to pander both to the system and to those who are
hurting, the latter being the main target, because the former is the ordering
party that has hired “thegreatresetter” to whom “thegreatresetter” only has
the obligation to report. The latter, however, will not read his book. They
do not have the time. There is no way that “thegreatresetter” doesn’t know
that. In addition, there are less than a few academics whose leanings are,
academically speaking, sympathetic to the downtrodden. In real life, they
will not give up their salaries and positions to join the underclass. The
accusation here is of insincerity of “thegreatresetter”. This is what one
takes away from his writings and if that feeling is in error,
“thegreatresetter” must apply much more effort in order to make himself
convincing that it is otherwise. Only demonstrating cold formal sympathy
through listing of known examples of unhappiness characterizing the
downtrodden does not cut the mustard.
HYPOCRITICAL FAWNING TO THE SUPPRESSED—
Instead of frankly laying out the reality of the situation, and this would be
of no surprise, considering the manipulative nature of his writings,
“thegreatresetter” hastily withdraws his utopian dreams fawning to the
precariat, and admits theatrically that the changes will not occur without
social turmoil. But, wait a minute, where did the cov-pandemic go? Wasn’t
the cov-pandemic to be the stimulus for social change that would remove
the grounds for social turmoil? Hypocrisy is what comes to mind when
thinking about an author, such as “thegreatresetter”. Can one expect
anything good to come out from a duplicitous author? A new obfuscation,
undertaken to cover his back, by mentioning that the virus may cause
social unrest, however, does not erase the earlier blunder which was

61
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

suggesting that, on the contrary, cov-pandemic, when gone, will bring

good things to the precariat.
It is obvious that “thegreatresetter” is uncertain in the social
response to the non-democratic essence of the “great reset ”, so he resorts
to unbridled populism, trying to fawn to the common sentiment
amongst the suppressed, addressing their persistent lament of being
overworked and underpaid—“look what the hedge-fund managers are
getting.” Of course, “thegreatresetter” doesn’t really mean what he says
when he expresses his crocodile-teared concerns, because we have not
seen him and his fellow “greatresetters” leaving, without ever coming
back, the cocktail rooms with the caviar-spread sandwiches and
champaign, and instead taking hospital shifts at the beds of the alleged
cov-pandemic sufferers, replacing or supplementing the army of the gig-
economy precariat workers, hired for the job. We don’t see these
“greatresetters” going through all the rest of the toil they prescribe for us,
with their great “great reset”, because they are “they”, and are better than
“us”. We will leave it to their conscience, if there is any left, to cope with
that.
APPARENT JUSTIFICATION OF UNBRIDLED SURVEILLANCE
ADVOCATED BY THE “GREAT RESET”—Further, before entering the
most sensitive topic of the “great reset” proposal; namely, the loss of
privacy and massive unbridled surveillance, to which I will devote more
time later in the book, I would now only begin by playing devil’s
advocate. In addition to the need of the monied elite to protect itself
from riots and dissent, the latter being potential underminers of elite’s
dominance and which can be controlled by deep infiltration into the
souls of the multitude, through the much enhanced methods of
surveillance today, there are also terrorists and representatives of every
possible foreign enemy-force, adversarial to the United States.
Understandably, their movements and intentions must be monitored in
detail. So, the unspoken intent of depriving from privacy of the
American people as a whole, is conceived as sort of a twisted patriotic act
for preserving the country. Heavy is the crown of the Tzar. World
hegemony needs sacrifices on the domestic front. Thus, led along the
garden path of these thoughts, I came naturally to the oft-mentioned

62
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

idea of the public-private partnership, which would allow the public

government to ask the private super-rich elite (or, rather, the other way
around) for help in this world, perceived as uncertain. I almost acquitted
in my soul everyone who has contributed to the generation of the
privacy-intrusion techniques, not realizing while walking along the
garden path, the intended destructive side of the details of this intrusion,
ruinous for the country, which I discuss at various places in this book.
Right there, right in this intervention and command of the
private unelected billionaires, monitoring

• what we are supposed to read

• what the health, security or education policy is

• how we should organize our life

• what principles the economy should obey

all this private, central, unelected control on every thinkable issue of our
life, is the really scary part, the part of the greatest, utmost concern. I
realized, stepping out of the garden path into reality, that if the enemies
of the United States make us do all this to protect the country from its
enemies, then it would mean that they have won. This book has its say
on some of these major issues.
Unfortunately, this book only reveals the scary fact of this
societal cancer, only to see it grow and take over the western world,
without being able to do one thing in order to stop it, hoping the
remission would occur somehow spontaneously; at that, not by re-
establishing capitalism in its raw form of today’s neoliberalism but
healing its defects in a reasonable democratic way. Sometimes remission
takes place but that is very rare. In our case, the proposed conversion of
the world into a world of the ultimate totalitarian control, is so bizarre,
that its dialectical antitoxin seems almost around the corner. We should
only hope that the latter expectation is not just a sweet dream.

63
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

SURVEILLANCE—IMPLEMENTATION OF “GREAT
RESET” THROUGH OBFUSCATION—In order to preempt
inevitable concerns regarding the ceding of individual human rights—a
goal which, in fact, is exactly what the “great reset” exercise aims at—the
issue is obfuscated by offering scenarios, proposing that concerns
regarding individual rights have no grounds because of the fact that such
personal-rights-violation scenarios are nothing new, bringing as an
additional argument the free, unconcealed admission that, see,
governments and firms intensely use surveillance. These concerns of
violating individual rights have been addressed many times, imply
“thegreatresetters”, therefore we need not worry any more about such
trifles. Notice again, this is talked about prior to even cursory addressing
of the in-your-face pattern-evidence, needed to sustain the ubiquitous
reality of the alleged cov-pandemic. So, “thegreatresetter” institutes the
manipulated seemingness as a given and then revels at the result,
building grim utopian castles of world dominance; at that, without the
victims having a bit of recourse.
As already discussed, when speaking of “well known facts of
surveillance”, these concerns being nothing new notwithstanding, scare
tactics and terror are the real well known age-old tactics of any
dictatorial regime to tighten its grip even more. Concerns about these
tactics come as a result of the use of such tactics as instruments of
suppression. The mere concerns that there is surveillance per se, are
secondary. Therefore, if we should talk about what is already known, we
must reiterate that it is the reality and efficiency of such tactics used for
suppression that is really already well known, not just the mere known
fact that firms use surveillance on their employees. Thus, we must
reiterate also, that worries that these tactics may be repeated, are very
legitimate, no matter how diminishingly they are referred to by
“thegreatresetter”, as, see, how very well known these worries are. It is
even more worrisome when such tactics use health-related scare, scarier
still being when the health-related scare is artificially embellished,
through the privately-owned world mass media, to appear more mortal
and inevitable than it really is. The grip on society becomes more
agreeable when every person is told that the controlling precautions,

64
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

which can be fabricated, are for his own good, and that person adopts
this as an intimate truth, knowing that, like nothing else, it directly
concerns his own skin.
Yes, but, you know, some countries take measures against that
sinister end, “thegreatresetter” starts to ease the tension. He knows that
it always seems more trustworthy when both sides of the issue appear to
be presented with a seeming symmetry.
However, the alert reader detects the drastic, although subtle,
made in passing, skewing of this symmetry towards the ends
advocated by “thegreatresetter”, when interjecting philosophically by
using trivialities such as, that “when there is fear there is also hope”, or
that “when there is real danger of violating human rights, there should
be hope that there are always ways to resist it”. This is reminiscent of the
answer given by the apparatchiks when one reads certain ideological
literature, which clearly calls for eradication of entire peoples. When
expressing an utter puzzlement and disgust at such an abhorrent
suggestion, the advice is to not look into the details but to apply that
ideology creatively.
It resembles also the dismissive reply, which a certain political
force in the USA, claiming to wage a revolution against the oligarchy
gives, presenting Sweden as their ideal, when confronted by the obvious
fact that Sweden is an absolute oligarchy, entrenched by the law of the
land, and therefore Sweden cannot serve as an example of the
accomplished goal of a revolution against oligarchy.
When you are dishonest and manipulative, it is part of your
nature to be able to say, in an attempt to give the impression of
untarnished democracy, that the 2020 elections in the USA were not
“rigged” but were “fortified”, as an article in Time magazine puts it.
Like an eloquent pastor, but who would not bat an eye at
massaging truth, “thegreatresetter” preaches to have no fear of
governmental intervention, rather no fear of the private intervention of
the elites through governmentally installed algorithms, into everyone’s
life, because, see, nothing is inevitable and we must see the symmetry
between good and bad in the mass surveillance, not perceive the latter as
something fatal. “Thegreatresetter” is blind or, rather, plays blind, to the

65
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

enormous power of select individuals who, unelected and unappointed

by anyone, as they are, just by the power of their wealth, can play with
yours and mine and billions of other people’s destinies to elite’s own
liking and ends, while the only power you and I have left is to listen and
take for granted any spoiled idea which the powerful individuals dish
out for us. This drastic discrepancy is conveniently invisible to
“thegreatresetter” and he, even before firmly proving to us that the
pandemic he uses as a goad with which to prod us into the pen is real,
proceeds with what will happen in the imagined post cov-crisis period.
And, guess what, even if you inevitably experience inconvenience,
because the surveillance will stay on after the cov-crisis has disappeared
—having gone through the pandemic, it is already known how bad it is,
and therefore the awareness in the post cov-crisis world about health and
well-being will keep staying high—you just need not worry. Because, see,
both government and the individual can control and harness said abuse
of technology without sacrificing our collective values and freedoms.
One really wonders how much of a hypocrite one must be, enjoying
torturing and offending the reader’s intellect, in order to allow oneself to
foist such an asinine, non-existing symmetry between the power of the
state and the individual.“Thegreatresetter” really thinks that his readers
are stupid people, to say the least.
USUAL ABUSE OF TECHNOLOGY TO STAGE
SURVEILLANCE—As a matter of fact, state and company abuse of
surveillance is not science-fiction. It is hardly even a technology-fiction.
There is no fiction in applying known methods to observe people’s
actions. It is a matter of installing cameras and microphones and using
the internet connectivity of existing personal devices. There is nothing
fantastic and scientific in such mundane technical activity. Is there
anything scientific in using various tools to rob a bank? None at all, the
way there is nothing scientific in breaking your phone to avoid
surveillance or in digging a tunnel to jailbreak from your prison cell. The
only caveat is that soon, breaking your phone to avoid surveillance, will
become against the law on par with jailbreak—your cellphone will be
your prison cell, many times as efficient, yet low maintenance on the
books of the government. This is as of today, based on the current

66
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

technology. As for tomorrow, sky is the limit to the imagination in this

respect.
REMOVAL OF PRIVACY BY
INTRODUCING UNENCRYPTED DIGITAL MONEY—
Although this problem is discussed elsewhere in this book, one
important aspect of this ubiquitous monitoring of the individual
is worth mentioning here. It concerns the removal of privacy with
regard to currency. When you pull out of your pocket a dollar or
an euro bill and pay for your purchase, that purchase is made
completely anonymously to the central authorities. Even if you pay
with a debit card, which is connected to your bank account, the
central authorities will need a special warrant to tie your purchase to
you. Bitcoins, with their blockchains, are absolutely unsuitable for any
central control. Therefore, “thegreatresetters” have invented a special
unencrypted centralized digital currency, which would allow
immediate tracing of every possible transaction every individual
makes at any moment of the day or night, keeping the details of that
transaction in a database forever, ready to be analyzed, scored or pulled
out any time. Why this is so insidious and deserves so much
attention and why the individual is so much hurt and enslaved by such a
seemingly convenient way of functioning of the financial system will be
revealed later in this book. Therefore, any privacy-enabling fiat currency
of the sort of a dollar, euro and cryptocurrencies comprise a big threat
to the “great reset” and will be decisively tanked and replaced by the said
open type of digital currency. Notably, one great solution for mitigating
the extremes of capitalism; namely, the Unconditional Basic
Income (UBI), shifting the bottom of poverty scale from zero to a level
at which an individual can survive, is also not fit for the purpose of
the “great reset”, given the anonymous character of spending that
UBI. This privacy-denial is not something out of a utopian-world-
went-awry, but is achievable as we speak, provided the government
suddenly decides that its fiat currency will be replaced by an
unencrypted digital currency—a purely administrative act. Otherwise,
all the technicalities for such a conversion are at hand today.
If this is not scary on both a personal and corporate level, I
don’t know what is, especially by making it appear plausible by

67
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

adding that this way of handling currency will curb the illicit transfers of
money for supporting terrorists, money laundering and other
criminal financial activities; that is, making it appear plausible that
fighting crime by treating everyone as a potential criminal is
something in the order of things. The scariest of all is, that the entire
idea for this kind of dictate is spread out by someone, a mouthpiece,
appointed by the super-wealthy elite, who has never been at least a well-
known public figure, by someone never elected by anyone, to impose
elite’s half-baked ideas on the world and to put these ideas into the
mouths of world figures, beginning with the Vatican pontiff and
ending with the future monarch of Great Britain.
Further in this book, we will learn what the real role of that
unencrypted digital currency is in establishing digital fascism to enslave
the world, directing everyone towards accomplishing the main goal of
the super-wealthy elite—the homogenization of society.
IMPOVERISHING SOCIETY—THE FIRST STEP
TOWARDS ENSLAVING, TO ACHIEVE THE ULTIMATE
GOAL—COMPLETE SOCIETAL HOMOGENIZATION—For
the society to reach such state of malleability, it must first be
impoverished by arresting it through made-up panic, with the help of
employing scaremonger methods such as pandemics. Then, already
impoverished, society must be made dependent on this governmentally
issued “free” unencrypted digital money, disbursed to everyone,
depending on each individual level of obedience to the party line—the
party line being the homogenization of society. This is, in a nutshell, the
essence of the “great reset”.
EMPHASIS ON THE INTERTWINED CHARACTER
OF THE ABOVE TWO INDELIBLE ELEMENTS OF THE NEW
ENSLAVEMENT—Therefore, noticing digitization of society as an
end in itself is insufficient when one is concerned with its insidious role.
Usually, analysts emphasize its dehumanizing role as a result of the
uniformity which it incurs. If that is all, many think it can be overcome
on a personal level and one may enjoy only the positives and
convenience which digitization brings into our lives, while hiding
behind the security of various assets, or even gold, which one
may possess, which appear as the ultimate guard against any

68
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

governmental (elite, that is) invasion in one’s life. However, these analysts
fail to comprehend that when unencrypted digital money becomes the
only legal way of economic exchange, a way which is immediately
available in the hands of the government, acting always as the crony of
the elite, even that ultimate protector of liberty is taken away from the
individual.
In addition, many analysts further fail to notice the connection
between that sort of digital money (unencrypted digital money) and the
necessarily imposed pauperization though deliberate installment of
various crises. Without realizing the need for throwing the population
into paucity, one may not realize the full depth of the problem in
combination with the installment of the unencrypted digital money
economy, as much as such digitization, taken even isolatedly, seems
bothersome and unacceptable. Thus, advertising digitization gives a false
sense of connectedness, which may lead in actuality to inescapable
slavery. The addition of the above “induced poverty”-“unencrypted
digital money” connection may really click in some, as it did in me, while
listening to the doom and gloom scenarios about digital money but still
not understanding exactly where the problem is. Curiously, sometimes
one sentence, even one word, can change the whole world perspective of
a person.
Of course, after such realization, one immediately ponders
about ways to escape from that enslavement. This time, it is a tough one.
A first step of liberation from such ubiquitous digital tyranny is to
cancel all connections with any subscription-based parasite sites pestering
the free internet, especially those going by the funny, hypocritical
moniker “social media”. Understandably, however, that will not help if
the principle of the unencrypted currency is introduced as the only legal
tender, which everyone, turned into a panhandler, will run to the
government begging for. How is the individual to free himself from that
inevitable menace is a matter worthy of a special separate discussion. For
now, all one can do is give a little taste of what that symbiosis between
deliberate impoverishment and unencrypted digital money may look like,
presented in the example given in “THE REAL DAMNING OF THE
LES POÈTES MAUDITS (DAMNED POETS)”.

69
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

IMMATERIAL IF PANDEMIC IS REAL—Now,

having just outlaid the mechanism of enslavement to model the
homogeneity of society, it could be remarked, in passing, that
for achieving the mentioned goal, summed up in the term “great
reset”, it doesn’t really matter whether or not the pandemic is real,
as long as the massive propaganda by the privately owned global
media manages to generate a world crisis. Of course, for an honest
analyst, first ascertaining the reality of pandemic is crucial, especially
when it is in the form of a purported cov-pandemic, which supposedly
causes a cov-crisis, the latter said to be the trigger for a “great reset”.
Because, suppose that a way is found to prove unequivocally (the
way relativity is an unequivocally proven absurdity) that the cov-
pandemic is a hoax. This would cause turmoil in every honest
observer’s soul. As shown in this book, there is clear evidence
leading to thoughts about such artificial implementation of a fake
threat of a pandemic (not to a doubt that there really is SARS-
CoV-2 and that it is in actuality causing tragedies) for the purposes of
achieving political goals; at that, no less political goals than removing the
obstacles before the imagined global imposition of something touted as
the “great reset”. By the way, the adjective “imagined” was not used by
chance. Quite significantly, one China, for example, in all likelihood,
won’t cooperate with the West in adopting the particular way of slavery
advertised by the “great reset”. This fact must serve as a cold shower
to the fiery enthusiasm of “thegreatresetter’s” readiness at the prospect
of celebrating the true global victory of the “great reset”, so much
cherished by him.
HOW IS DENYING COV-PANDEMIC NOT A
CONSPIRACY THEORY, SINCE IT’S RECOGNIZED
IN ALMOST EVERY COUNTRY?—What was just said throws one
into a bit of confusion, to put it mildly. How can anyone deny the
reality of cov-pandemic, since almost every country recognizes it? This
smacks of nothing other than a low-class, at once debunkable,
conspiracy theory.
Really? Not so fast, though.
Well, consider the apparently flabbergastingly smashing “every-country-
ness”, much more exceptionless than the adoption of cov-
pandemic, in the face of relativity. The propaganda has made relativity

70
  Not “Restart” But a “Great Reset” 

so monolithically invincible throughout the world, that even a thought

of doubting it is met with resentment, which has become as natural as
breathing for any living human in the world.
Every single country on Earth recognizes officially, gladly
spending inane amounts of tax money on it, that relativity is the greatest
scientific theory there is.
Yet, every citizen of the world can immediately
and unequivocally convince himself personally of the opposite; namely,
that relativity is an outright absurdity (cf. Addendum) that has not a
minute of legitimacy in the body of science.
The example with the ubiquitous acceptance of relativity,
which is at once shown to be absurdity, goes to show that universal
recognition is not an argument of truth. Mistakes cannot be undone by
turning them into a collective belief. When the collective belief is
accepted as an argument that something untrue is true, it is precisely
such belief that comprises conspiracy. This is especially valid regarding
medical questions, which are complex and are not at all prone, by their
very nature, to be resolved by immediate unequivocal arguments, such as
the ones available in debunking relativity. The sense of conspiracy on the
part of those pushing medical claims, in order to cause social
disturbances, is additionally sharpened by finding absolute facts, such as
the patterns seen in the plots shown in Fig.1, providing hints against the
monolithic propaganda cliché connecting a societal crisis to a particular
virus, excluding everything else as the crisis agent. More on this figure
will be said later in this book.

71
ELEMENTS OF THE “GREAT RESET”
 Worries About Economy Unduly Dominate “Great Reset” Talk 

In view of the above, worries about the effect on the economy of

something such as cov-pandemic, questionable as a factor to begin
with, is an exercise in futility. A factor may be the inadequate
actions of the politicians, but the lack of clarity about the reality
of cov-pandemic resembles panic caused by a scarecrow. Politicians
are supposed to be better than that.
Furthermore, it is a permanent major question in this and
similar sort of books—if politicians are so concerned about major global
issues, then why are issues of a century-long urgency, having much
greater long-term adverse impact on society, invisible to them? Thus,
why don’t they stop the billions of dollars squandered every year on
pseudo-science comprising outright absurdities, exemplified by
relativity? No, they won’t stop that waste. The welfare of society, the
correct thinking of peoples, is the last thing on the agenda of the
politicians, always occupied only with their own stay in power and with
nothing else. To say nothing that, as said, muddled thinking of the
multitude is exactly what plays right into the hands of the governing
super-wealthy elite that puts the politicians in place.
Therefore, any worries expressed by politicians or writers of
books about the “great reset”, including worries about the economy, are
just a cover in the form of pretend-concerns of an elite which doesn’t
give a hoot about the world. As if one can expect anything else from the
self-centeredness, passive-aggressive arrogance and unaccountability of
elements asked by no one to hold the flashlights guiding the multitude
through the thicket of time and history, having no other qualities, except
finding themselves at the helm by the mere chance of having
wealth, inherited power or the Machiavellian abilities to wiggle through
the ranks of the power structures. If nothing else, one should
immediately give up on these, let alone pay attention to anything
coming from them or their cronies, the minute one senses the poisonous
breath of their intrusion. Unfortunately, these elements, comprising the
super-wealthy elite, are continuously improving the measures to not

72
  Dominance, Not Economy 

allow you off the hook (cf. “Pandemic on a personal level—crash of “I

don’t participate” ideology”). Therefore, we feel compelled to spend
some time with these mediocrities, at least to know what is being
prepared for us.
INCREDIBLE MIXTURE OF STANDARD ECONOMIC
TRIVIA AND PURPORTED EFFECT OF CLAIMED COV-
PANDEMIC—Disentanglement of the boring issues which fill the
writings on the “great reset”, in trying to see if all this makes any sense,
we find it not at all rare that “thegreatresetter” likes to go on a tangent,
drifting into ruminations about the effects of pandemics on the
economy in general. However, as was said, in this analysis, we are not
interested in how epidemics or pandemics affect economics and society,
in principle. That is trivial.
Therefore, the question whether during a pandemic, saving
economy should prevail over saving lives, belongs to a different
conversation, although even at this point, we may note decisively that
saving human lives has the most incontestable priority ever. To say
nothing, and that is a recurrent point throughout this book, that in
order to discuss any effects of an alleged pandemic, we should be sure
that it really is a pandemic. For this reason, the decision-makers have at
their disposal a hitherto unrecognized by them, but very powerful
absolute criterion—the pattern-evidence. In cases where no anomalies
are seen in the pattern-evidence plot (cf. “PATTERN-EVIDENCE
FOR THE SAME PERIOD WHEN “GREAT RESET” IDEA WAS
BORN” and Fig.1), it is a sure sign that nothing extraordinary is
happening in the public health status of the country, and a lockdown is
not only not justified, but will put in jeopardy many people with serious
real diseases, who will be neglected in favor of the coronavirus en vogue
during the panic of the lockdown. Thus, within months after the
lockdown, when the cold weather and the fog hit the country at the end
of the year, there will be anomalously sharp increase of the deaths from
all causes. This anomaly, however, will be the result of wrong public
health policy, not as a result of one of the minimal death-factors, such as
the coronavirus of the day. Such analysis, putting at the center the
question of whether or not the cov-pandemic is real, is the really

73
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

honest analysis when it comes to where the ruminations over cov-

pandemics must begin, rather than beating around the bush with
talk about the economy, hit by a crisis, resembling talk about
economy which is common for the retirees reclining in their
armchairs at a country club. When one has nothing much to say,
while at the same time has to fulfill someone’s order to come out with
something, anything, which would justify dictatorial, totalitarian
measures, the usualness of the aftermath of any crisis comes in
handy. Decorating it with dictatorial elements is even better and in the
end, thus cooked, the eclectic politico-economic meal begins to shape
up, even as something worthwhile as a guide about what the future
would look like. In any event, such a creation will amount neither
to good literature, nor to a serious tractate containing profound
analysis, but would be ideal as a propaganda tool, which may even make a
name for “thegreatresetter”.
Interestingly, “thegreatresetter”, discussing in detail effects
of a cov-pandemic as what usually any pandemic does,
either subconsciously or deliberately, manipulates to take the
cov-pandemic as something already established and, therefore, all
that remains for us to do is treat it as every other pandemic. That was
not his initial intention, however, was it? Aside from the problems
with the unconditional adopting that cov-pandemic is real,
“thegreatresetter” was trying to present the cov-pandemic as
not your usual pandemic but a special sort of pandemic, which
would lead, after a chain of syllogisms, to nothing other than a
“great reset” after it wanes, didn’t he?
Therefore, what still remains unanswered and continues to
interest us here, is something quite concrete; namely, why is the alleged
cov-pandemic pronounced to be the factor for the appearance of a “new
normal”, why should the “great reset” be looming as an inevitable
consequence specifically due to the cov-pandemic? Unfortunately, the
answer to this question is wanting in the writings of “thegreatresetter”,
instead, discussing the aftermath of cov-pandemic, as questionable as it
really is, on par with the aftermath of just any pandemic.
THE PROBLEM IS NOT THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
BUT THE REALITY OF THE PANDEMIC—Many pages of
economic analyses may be written, trying to analyze how economy will be
affected by the onslaught of a societal crisis. Effects, especially of a

74
  Dominance, Not Economy 

cov-crisis, on economy and society, however, aside from being expected,

just like the adverse effects from any crisis, will always be wanting in
explanation, if the reality of the cov-pandemic has cracks all over it and
suspicions exist that the cov-pandemic is nothing other than a media
creation. If that were so, then the origin of the resulting cov-crisis can be
nothing other than a media creation as well, specifically designed to serve
political goals as a vicious shortcut, as discussed in other parts of this
book.
These suspicions for the artificial, media origin, of the cov-
pandemic, causing the respective cov-crisis, are stoked by truths which
cannot be denied:

• absolute pattern-evidence data

• private ownership of hospitals directly benefitting from

the cov-crisis

• private pharmaceutical companies, unwilling to take

responsibilities for mishaps which their product may cause
patients, while profiting directly from the crisis

• global private ownership of the media broadcasting the rumor of a

pandemic

• corrupt experts expecting personal advancement and benefits from

supporting the idea of a pandemic

• obvious disagreements between proclaimed experts

Thus, if the viral pandemic is imagined, all these pages of economic

analysis will mean nothing more than the usual economic banter, blaring
from the loudspeakers of the mostly privately-owned media as a daily
background noise.

75
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Furthermore, today’s economic analysis will not make much

sense, let alone have originality, when the underlying society has already
been conditioned throughout many years to readily adopt its new
state. Society has already been made ripe for a “great reset”, after
years of conditioning and waiting for the trigger. At the beginning of
2020, the needed trigger presented itself in the form of a seemingly
godsend event, pronounced to be a cov-pandemic.
Otherwise, economic theories are born every day, but they can
hardly invoke any interest in not too few readers. What made me curious
to read a book about the alleged cov-pandemic, written by an economist,
proponent of the “great reset”, was his implying that he may show some
new evidence, some new unusual method, which would confirm that
the purported cov-pandemic is real, that it really is the cause for the cov-
crisis and that the cov-crisis indeed is bound to invoke not just a “restart”
in the post cov-crisis world, but will cause something unheard of and
unseen, going by the moniker “great reset”. None of these
expectations were fulfilled, unfortunately. Instead, when reading the
proposed “great reset” goal more thoroughly, I found with
astonishment that a crisis of that kind was really desired and urgent to
the interests of the super-wealthy elite—to its interests, not to
the interests of everyone else. If there were no crisis handy, it would
have been created, no matter how many cracks and holes such bespoke
crisis might have.
ECONOMIES WERE NOT HIT BY THE VIRUS BUT
BY THE PRIMORDIAL FEAR INSTILLED BY THE MEDIA—
There is no hard evidence, which a person can observe with his own
eyes, that the lockdown imposed in the Spring of 2020 is caused by cov-
pandemic. All available evidence which can be inspected personally,
speaks to the opposite—there are countries with no pattern-evidence
anomalies at all, while the countries exhibiting anomalies vary in the
performance of the anomaly, which can be grouped into several types of
patterns, a kind of varying clustering in need of explanation. This is not
an in-depth study of the phenomenon, but even a cursory glance at the
available data reveals a drastic difference in the run of the curves, which
can hardly be a trivial phenomenon during a genuine pandemic. Let
alone that indications for increased incidents of influenza in one of the

76
  Dominance, Not Economy 

purportedly most affected countries, Italy, were observed during the

course of a number of previous years1, while the pattern-evidence
shows that there are countries with no such anomalous increase.
LOW ECONOMIC GROWTH AGENDA—Intertwined
into all the expected talk about the effects of the purported cov-
pandemic, are important hidden elements, which can be easily missed
amongst the monotonous sentences, as if taken straight from a report of
the Politburo before some follow-up congress of the totalitarian party. If
reading those sentences would not put you to sleep, and you exert some
extra effort to read it diligently, you will not fail to notice that one of the
agendas of the “great reset” is the already decades-old call for the
establishment of a post-industrial society. Among other features of the
post-industrial society, also known as globalist society, which will be
discussed also in other parts of this book, is the need for establishing low
economic growth agenda, which is pushed throughout the writings of
“thegreatresetter” as a desired goal to reach, also known as the “new
normal”. Under this scenario, “thegreatresetter” plants the idea that
people themselves will find the concept of growing GDP not exactly the
most sensible. This begs the question, why now, exactly after
this particular crisis, the cov-crisis, did people wake up to the idea
that the increase of GDP is senseless? There were crises before.
What has changed? The answer “thegreatresetter” gives is that
something happened out of the blue, some cov-pandemic dawned
upon humanity and that is what is requiring a “great reset”—an
obviously superficial answer. There is more spelled out on this topic
for the need of slowing down the economic growth, more notably seen
in the statements of the future British monarch, mentioned shortly.
CONTRIBUTION OF THIS AUTHOR CONCERNING
THE PREMEDITATED NATURE OF THE OBSERVED CRISIS
—The real answer is that what has changed are the ill-conceived anti-
capitalist sentiments, paradoxically portrayed as requesting “capitalism
without capitalism”, which have creeped out from the groups in society
espousing these views since around the nineteen sixties, into the levels
shaping the policies directing society and from there, into
the government. This subversion, on which we will devote even more

77
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

pages later in this book, has taken years, mainly through the destroyed
soft sciences, a destruction determined by the demolition of the exact
sciences from the beginning of the twentieth century on. This took place
covertly, in academia, and was invisible to society at large. Of course,
there were visible propagandist demonstrations of the ills of
overproduction dirtying our Earth and our oceans, thus, mandating the
industrialization-slowing-down hand of the post-industrial world. One
could even see years ago the future monarch of Great Britain, one of the
greatest propagandists of post-industrialism and the “great reset”, sailing
in a boat in one of the bays of Hong Kong, pointing to the garbage
floating around him, symbolizing the pollution caused by
overproduction leading to overconsumption, blaming all that on
unrestrained capitalism. Upon first viewing and reading, one cannot but
agree with the future monarch. However, read on and you will find out
how deviously such demonstrations of the obvious are being harnessed
to shape up and weave an incredibly elaborate enslavement of the world,
which no earlier totalitarian system could accomplish.
The above problems notwithstanding, at this juncture, everyone
concerned with the roots of the evil engulfing our world, must stop, take
a deep breath and realize that it is the demolition of exact sciences during
the twentieth century, which must be finally identified as the really deep
kernel that shot forth the crooked intellectual roots whose bitter social
fruits we are now made to consume societally. The culprit is the derision
to which the truth is subjected, as a result of demolished science.
Everything else, all practical and conceptual ills, stem singularly from the
upset quality of thinking of the world, relegated to the limited, if not
mediocre, thinking, of an accidental small elite that happened to possess
super-wealth, which that elite thinks entitles it to be the privileged ruler
of world. Even if this elite were very bright, which it is not, even then it
could not match the quality of thought of individuals who would
emerge from the billion people multitude, had they not been suppressed
and held back and had they been allowed to freely develop their talents.
Thus, society has now already reached a stage, completely
destroyed, rather, a stage when, as said, it is ripe for the physical “great

78
  Dominance, Not Economy 

reset” into the new political state, exactly the demolished state desired by
the masters of the “greatresetter”, whom “thegreatresetter” is
sycophantly fawning, busily writing propaganda texts promoting their
intentions. In other words, “thegreatresetter”, in his advocacy of the
great reset, discovers nothing new. He only registers what has already
become the norm in society at large, growing by the day. A crisis, any
crisis, would act as a developer in the dark room of the photographer, in
order to reveal what is already there on the societal plaque, which has
been building there throughout the many years of conditioning. Its
building and implementation did not meet with much resistance
because the ordinary individuals do not have much recourse other than
to embrace opportunism. Opportunism is not foreign to a large
enough number of people, who may go against any principles, ready to
go even against themselves, in order to earn the thirty pieces of silver.
This frailty of human nature, sometimes an expression of extreme
despair, is known well by those whose bellboy is “thegreatresetter”, and
they exploit it to the fullest.
This already covertly accomplished process of reshaping the
world throughout the course of decades towards the self-destructive
state, now signified by the “great reset”, is the reason why a cov-crisis
and its follow-up post cov-crisis appears as if it is different from
other global crises. Thus, to sum it up—first, unlike other crises,
the cov-crisis is mostly a media creation, and second, it acts on the
inherited milieu of an ideologically re-conditioned society, an inherited
re-conditioning which is usually absent in the aftermath of other crises.
Although every society after every crisis reflects on what really
matters, the after-crisis period rarely grants ready solutions. In the
current case of cov-crisis, having ideas that have already been
drummed into society for decades, such as, for example, ideas for a
fairer and a greener future, this time the after-cov-crisis has in place
a ready-made underlying matrix with an already ingrained idea for
such future. The idea of a greener future is the relatively newer
brainwashing instrument, the older being the hypocritical (in the mouth
of the elite) idea of a fairer society. Historically, ideas for fairer
society have always gained a great deal of supporters, independent of the
real intentions of the propagandists of the idea. Adding the “greener”

79
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

component comes to supplement the “fair” idea, intended for a youth

which has not seen the ills of war, pampered and consumer-oriented,
which, not in need of only striving to survive, was left alone to develop
its natural instincts. The youth, especially in the West, has never in
history been more beautiful, better fed, of better upbringing and better
entertained. It has become the attraction of the entire world, which can
see it in the palm of its hand today, holding a telephone or whatever the
current name of that portable device is. Unfortunately, well-taken care
of and developed in a biological aspect, youth’s cognitive abilities
have taken a backseat in many. Predominance, vigorous stimulation
rather, of the biological, in an advanced Nazi style, in the current post-
modernist culture, also makes youth more aware of
surrounding natural phenomena, which are usually taken for granted,
youth overly conscious of the environment, of the climate, as well
as, sadly, considering its cognitive abilities secondary in importance,
all of that conditioning results in falling easy prey to manipulations.
Add to it the mentioned overall biologism in the post-modern,
globalist ideology, an ideology which is an expanded version of the
biologism of the Nazis, the latter limiting itself predominantly to
racism, which post-modernism has as a component, developing and
ramifying it, and the prerequisites for the “great reset” begin to emerge
from the deluge of words. Thus, the “great reset” acquires a more
intelligible outlook, proving why the post cov-crisis state of the
world would differ from any other post-crisis. That discovery, as to
why the aftermath of specifically the cov-crisis will be different from
the aftermath of just any crisis, is this author’s conclusion,
however, “thegreatresetter” providing, as said, no explanation
as to why it is that exactly this post cov-crisis should be different
from the aftermath of any crisis and will make us find ourselves in an
anticipated completely different world when post cov-crisis hits. It may
be added that an attempt was made in the past four years to save the US
from this self-destructive rut (cf. “The president—a romantic hero,
liberator from the “great reset” post-industrial, post-modern slavery”)
but that attempt was predictably squandered by the
already overwhelmingly grown strength of the “white whale” of
the post-industrial society.

80
 Dominance, Not Economy

PUZZLING REMINDER OF UNABOMBER’S

MANIFESTO IN THE OFFICIAL CONSIDERING OF DE-
GROWTH—When it comes to the advocacy of slow economic growth,
one doesn’t know what to make of it. It sounds like a far-cry from the
Luddite movement. As a matter of fact, the whole sense one gets when
reading “thegreatresetter’s” texts, carrying the scent of a late Luddism,
convinced that improving a system can be done by an administrative
destroying of it by the central government, is a sense of creative
destruction of sorts, reminiscent of neoliberalism, paradoxically coming
from a “great reset” proposal, ostensibly opposed to neoliberalism. In
terms of the newer times, the praise of slowed economic growth
comes across as almost coming straight from the pages of the
Unabomber’s manifesto, once universally decried as the writing of a
mad domestic terrorist. There is no question that unbridled, gone
out of control, economic growth for the sake of economic growth,
stimulating wasteful overconsumption, is an evil consequence of
greed which capitalism cannot curb due to its very nature.
However, putting the existing capitalism in order; that is, curbing its
greed, through administrating it totalitarian style and killing it by
instilling inadequate controls and market intervention, is the last
thing that would help. China is functioning under totalitarian
control, but not of the kind that is bound to commit suicide through
killing its market and all other essential attributes of capitalism.
China will go on that way, in opposition to utopian growth-slowing
proposals of a tiny western super-wealthy elite, having nothing else to
do but to dream up bad plans to make matters worse. Who, then,
has the historical chance—the system which goes along its
principles, or a system which doesn’t like its principles and instead
of proposing working solutions to improve the system, decides to deal
with its ills by killing itself?
Slowing the economic growth through putting a spanner in
the works of the system, is inexplicable as a proposed tool in the hands of
the governors of a country, even if it is just a way of pandering to
anything living, in the name of promoting the idea of the total central
control, so much desired by the elites. Central control has always been in
the focus of those who want to rule the world. That may require new
tactics never seen before, even if it appears a little over the edge and

81
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

amounts to self-destruction. However, what do I know. I am neither in

the shoes of the elite in question, nor fully understand its
ambitions. Besides, the population is so much conditioned through
brainwashing, to the extent that America is unrecognizable from what it
was even twenty years ago. So, these pernicious innovative tactics may
be exactly what flies now publicly, so that a populist may bask in the
bliss of popular approval. Lost lives and maiming is already
forgotten and only the message remains. I wonder if, indeed, the
innovation will go so bad that it one day may become similar in its
bizarreness to inviting ISIS to join the UN, as one candidate for that
chair was pandering to those who were expected to support her
candidacy. How many more political “miracles” are we expected to see
during our lifetime—from the self-deprecation of the elites throughout
the world, only to adopt a better acceptable form reflecting
the changing times, just like the British crown flexibly does now and
then—otherwise it would not have been able to hold on to the
power and would have lost its power if it were stubborn, as it
happened to the French crown. Wasn’t the monumental collapse of
the Soviet Union enough to see in a lifetime, or now should we be
witnessing the falling apart of Russia and of the USA, judging from
what happened in 2020, splitting the country in half, an effect far
outweighing the effect of any pandemic but which was deliberately
catalyzed by a make-believe pandemic? Thus, instead of seeking
solutions to heal, instead of putting all heads together to find the road to
a brighter future, the bitterness has taken over, finding solace in splitting
up and destruction.
LISTING KNOWN THINGS DOESN’T HELP—As
already noted, intending to say here a little more on this topic, one of the
things we have continued interest in understanding in this exposé, is
why it was specifically the cov-pandemic that was fated to be designated
as different from other pandemics causing crises, and in this way
specifically this cov-crisis qualified to serve the role of a trigger for the
new world of the “new normal”. Unfortunately, one was not able to
discern any cogent explanation to that effect in “thegreatresetter’s” text.
Conversely, it was concluded, as a finding of this author, that the
conditions for what is now called “great reset”, were already at hand,
built throughout many decades, prior to even the thought of speculating
with a cov-crisis.

82
  Dominance, Not Economy 

The latter, however, was only this author’s take on the matter. In
disbelief that a central point, such as what makes a cov-crisis distinct from
an ordinary crisis, the reading continued with fortified intensity in the hope
there would come a time when “thegreatresetter” would finally give a clue
exactly why, according to him, the cov-crisis was so special that it
would outperform any other crisis and would cause the installment
of a state never heard of before, defined by the term “great reset”. Alas,
all that one encountered upon further reading was just listing of
factors, spelled out as a result of interviewing organizations and individuals,
regarding what enhances the cov-crisis effect. In this listing we see factors
such as

• arriving from dense populace

• quick spread through travel

• suspecting lack of need for personal protection

which amounts to enumerating well known and expected factors for any
pandemic. However, there had been more contagious viruses out there,
and densely populated areas are not a new phenomenon, attributive to
this cov-crisis, purportedly brought about by cov-pandemic, so that the
cov-crisis is to be considered different from other crises.
Therefore, this listing of factors also did not help
“thegreatresetter” in making himself clear as to what exactly made this
one particular cov-crisis so special, as he implied, even if we adopt the
thesis that the cov-pandemic is real and that it was indeed the cov-
pandemic that triggered the cov-crisis, and even if we further adopt that it
is the cov-crisis that would cause a “great reset”. One may even
mention, if one should at all keep speculating about matters residing on
such drifting intellectual sands, that an unlisted above factor, such as the
longer incubation period of this particular coronavirus, might be
contributing to the specific character of the cov-crisis. In fact, even after
listing all these factors we still remain reassured, especially provided the
pattern-evidence, that it is not the pandemic character of the event
which could make it act as a trigger. Once again, as it was already

83
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

concluded, what made a difference was the fact that the world was
already prepared, after many years of conditioning, to enter the new
order, now the elite choosing to name it the “great reset”. Any trigger,
not necessarily a pandemic, would have done it. Cov-pandemic was,
however, the easiest way, in view of its manipulativeness and the most
efficient method under the political circumstances. No

• economic shocks

• extreme weather events

• racial tensions

• food scarcity

• sentiments of unfairness

can compare as stimuli, let alone as “mechanical triggers”, for unleashing

a global social event, compared to the panic caused by the elusive sense
of an impending pandemic, made up or real.
Now, however, comes the caveat, which the super-wealthy elite
of the West appears too myopic about. The use of the feeling for an
impending pandemic, a pandemic which happened to be cov-
pandemic, for the purpose of serving as a trigger for, in the end, the
“great reset”, applies only where there are pre-conditions for that;
namely, in the West. Cov-crisis could cause no “great reset” in places
such as China, which has had no intentions to play around with
destroying capitalism by pretending to make it inclusive—unless the
hunveybins’ (Red Guards’), heavily intertwined with one of the
US political parties, attempt in Wuhan for a coup d’état had succeeded.
It apparently didn’t and the central power in Peking which seemed
to extinguish it, continues to have no intention of implementing the
western “great reset” variant of fascism, and cooperate with the West in
destroying capitalism. China has its own brand and it is not an “anti-
capitalist capitalism”.

84
  Dominance, Not Economy 

Thus, it follows from the above that what really matters, if we want to
understand whether the cov-pandemic is real and is the inner motor of
the phenomenon we experience as cov-crisis, is not to pretend studying
the aspects of the cov-pandemic alone, aspects which are immanently
prone to interpretations and manipulations, but to seek unequivocal
methods and facts in the context of the bigger picture of society,
prepared in a new state and waiting for an efficient trigger to go off. This
is also how the aftereffects of the cov-crisis on world economies and life
are to be studied as well. Upon correct understanding of these post-
effects, they will all be “white swan” effects. There is no need to be a
prophet to know that getting a system out of tune is destructive, with
propensity to cause maelstroms. All in all, what is happening and will
happen has already been intellectually embedded, firstly in the academic
part of society, and then implemented politically; that is, it is a “white
swan” event, and has nothing to do with the medical problems and
consequences of a pandemic, even if it were indeed a genuine cov-
pandemic. Give me any crisis in 2020 and I wouldn’t need
“thegreatresetter”, to know that the world will find itself in a state of
“anti-capitalist capitalism” sentiment, presented now as the big “great
reset” discovery. The latter has slowly been baked in the ideological
furnace burning for decades, stoked by the self-preserving instincts of a
panicked ultra-rich elite, seeking ways to get out safely from the
deepening crisis which it has itself created and will keep creating if it is
allowed to continue its messianic role. Go back in years and read the
published materials or listen to speeches and interviews of
representatives who belong to this messianically-inclined super-rich elite
and you will hear spelled out point by point all the components of the
idea, now-presented as brand new, brandished under the moniker
“great reset”.
CLASSIFICATION INSTEAD OF ANALYSIS—A
peculiar situation is observed—a pseudo-pandemic may be induced, but
instead of uncovering who stays behind such a fake, it is adopted as the
real trigger of an, in fact, artificially induced real cov-crisis and a very
enthusiastic classification is presented as to how each country reacted to
the crisis in its job market. At that, all that has been said so far in view of

85
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

destructiveness that can apply to any crisis at all, not just pertaining to
cov-crisis, can also apply when it comes to job market. However, wasn’t
the cov-crisis expected to be different from all else leading to an unheard
of “great reset”? Well, whenever that kind of emphasis is needed, it is
explicitly pulled out and stated. However, in order for such a special
“great reset” scenario to go easier down the throat of the listener, then
any disaster picture will do for instilling a gloom and doom scare—the
more trivial that disaster picture, also known to work as a scarecrow, the
better.
In fact, as will be seen later, that effect on the job market, not so
much due to the usual effect of any crisis that comes and goes, but this
deliberately imposed and propagandistically prolonged, as if it is a
natural kind of crisis, such as that from 1918-1919, has further very
devious motives. This forceful imposition of the sense of crisis will lead,
as a result, to deliberate, forceful ruining of businesses and
impoverishing the multitude, so that they would have no other choice
but to come running to the elite-handled government for alms; at that,
distributed under the strict control to achieve the main aim of the elite—
the reduction and homogenization of that already reduced multitude.
Now, under this new regime, a population made to be down and out,
will have no choice but to accept from the government unencrypted
money, enslaving that multitude in its insurmountable clinch.
“Thegreatresetter” openly admits that businesses facing bankruptcy due
to the cov-crisis, rather forced into bankruptcy by governmentally
forged crisis, will beg the government for loans with a “covenant”
specially attached to them, making these businesses entirely dependent
on the whims of the government. (cf. “Emphasis on the intertwined
character of the above two indelible elements of the new enslavement”
and “Slight hope that we will be given justification for the dramatic need
for the “great reset” ”).
CLASSIFICATION OF THE TRITE—When absolute
truths to lean on are wanting when there is a problem to solve, or when
these absolute truths are inconvenient, and therefore are deliberately
considered invisible, one faces the open field of suggestions, guesses. or
at most, purportedly qualified analysis of data, to the extent that these

86
  Dominance, Not Economy 

data are made available. Furthermore, when one is not really serious
about studying a difficult problem which enjoys no clear-cut truths,
because the serious, the scientific approach, requires years of study
and even more years of doing actual scientific research, one resorts
to cherry picking common information, which today is in the
possession of even grade schoolers, and begins to make classifications
of the evident. Once the trite classification is ready, the somersault to
make it appear of use to a society in crisis, is one step away. These
ruminations are best made in the lobby of a hotel over gin and tonic or
during a dedicated seminar. Of course, as said, there is no need for any
real pandemic to be at hand, to indulge in such a pleasurable
occupation, such as figuring out, cigar in hand, what crises are good
or bad for. If there happens to be a crisis at hand, that would be all
the better. Well, it is true that if there is an international call for
action, that justifies all the more the immediate undertaking of the
occupation in question, without having a second thought about the
reality of what caused the calamity. However, didn’t we say that the
ruminations can take place even if there is no real threat? Besides, why
should we bother with the practicalities of the direct action? There
are others to think for us. It is warm in the bar and the leather
armchairs are comfortable. Why should one need to get into the
hurricanes and deluge of something that can be discussed in theory just
as well. I cannot believe that I am even saying this but there are texts
from which I see people actually engaging in such sort of armchair
analyses, believing that what would come out of these analyses would be
best for the world. Enough money in hand, what remains, is put the
cigar carefully in the ash tray, trying not to spill the gin and tonic, and
being part of the elite, send the analysis to the minions for
practical implementation, bringing it to the attention of prime
ministers and the like, appointed by you, called to order in Davos and
why not in other pleasant isolated places of natural beauty.
Thus, take, for example, the tracing and tracking via internet.
What else other than a children’s exercise is it, to occupy oneself with the
internet “technology” of tracking and tracing of the potential cases of a
virus contagion. Seventh graders in a trade school, overwhelmed with
portable devices hooked to the internet, may be assigned term papers for

87
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

developing the software for such tracing and tracking. To talk about
such an obvious thing in a book devoted to global issues, foretelling
overall “great reset” of the world system, is straight out diminishing the
main topic. The conclusion after reading such a text, purportedly
devoted to world issues, is either that the world has no problems at all,
and therefore there is nothing to talk about, filling the pages with just
anything, or that the writer himself is not up to the task.
Besides, given the admittedly questionable efficiency of the
internet tracking and tracing for curbing the spread of an infectious
disease, to say nothing if the pandemic threat is only a media creation,
why are the much greater concerns of allowing totalitarian governmental
control through this net tracing and tracking not discussed with the
prominence these concerns deserve? Indeed, in order to sound fair, these
concerns are preemptively mentioned marginally but are soon forgotten.
The emphasis is placed on some imagined role of efficient alert system
for advanced warning of suspicious signs of infection (if at all there is
such a thing, occurring out of the ordinary). One thing is for sure—the
developers of such apps will be very happy that the niche for “tracing
apps” is advertised from such a high place. Could there be arrangements
between these parties that we don’t know of (cf. more on the topic in
“Nightmare scenario centered around a lowly app”)? Seeing first hand
the corruption, which even the shocking discovery in the very pages of
the most prominent paper, as revealed in the Addendum, cannot stop,
proves that anything is possible on the corruption front. This time, with
what is shown in the Addendum, corruption on a large scale is caught
red-handed. Knowing this utmost corruption, freely allowed and
generously funded by the European Commission, the words of the EU
Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager, full of pledges that
EU can ensure that technology can guarantee privacy, sound like a joke.
EU Commission cannot ensure anything. If that is not true, and the EU
Commission can indeed ensure anything, the first thing the EU
Commission must do is stop funding of absurdities such as those
unequivocally proved in the Addendum, mimicking as science, causing
the squandering of billions of taxpayer dollars and euro. Stopping of this
waste is the greatest problem the European Union, and the entire world,

88
  Dominance, Not Economy 

for that matter, has. It is orders of magnitude greater a problem than the
purported man-made effect of climate change, let alone alleged cov-
pandemic. Promoting of absurd science, through funding, as the
European Commission does, devastates the cognitive abilities of the
European citizens and the citizens of the entire world, alongside
devastating pillaging of the taxpayer pocketbook. How can any other
problem, including anthropogenic climate change and handling of
pandemics, be addressed and resolved cogently amidst such dramatic
intellectual depredation of the basics of science, as the one presented in
the Addendum? It can’t. No question of public policy can be tackled
properly by employing squandered thinking, based on completely
destroyed basic notions, such as the notions of time, space and motion,
as the mauled contemporary science, lavishly supported by Washington
and Brussels, does. Anyone who thinks it is possible, is outright
irresponsible and that is inexcusable no matter what argument could be
given that it is not the job of the Brussels or Washington bureaucrats to
handle such problems. Such an argument does not stand scrutiny. The
public officials, bureaucrats or not, are not installed in the places in
which they find themselves, with the understanding that they can freely
squander the public wealth, without having any responsibility. Unless,
of course, the super-wealthy elite, which has installed these bureaucrats,
assumes that their pawns are installed there for the secret purpose of
massively wasting public money. If commissioner Margrethe Vestager
really “means what she says”, then she, and everyone else from the
European Commission, must take it immediately to heart to stop the
enormous waste taking place under the plausible claim that EU is
supporting science. This cancellation must occupy the first item of the
EU agenda, prior to anything else, climate change and epidemics
notwithstanding, should they be true to the high position to which they
have been entrusted, by the peoples of Europe, whether or not they were
indeed entrusted by the peoples of Europe notwithstanding. This
problem is discussed in greater detail in my book “Relativity is the
Mother of All Fake News” in timeisabsolute.org.

89
ELEMENTS OF THE “GREAT RESET”

 Acceleration of Human Thought and Where Computers Began 

In ruminating over the acceleration of human thought, a theme

creeping out in “thegreatresetter’s” texts, it may help considering what
the genesis is and how the development of the underlying tool—the
computer—came about. Similar rumination may be applied to the
roots of birth and evolution of any technical innovation, for that
matter. Understandably, in our case, we will concern ourselves with the
emergence of the computer, noting that any attempt to unpack the
roots and the essence of any creativity in principle, including finding
out the stimuli for its acceleration, is a thankless, if not impossible job.
Indeed, consider that we have found with certainty what makes a
person creative and the group, or society, celebrating and speeding up
such creativity, then we would write instructional books and will
deliver university courses, turning everyone attending them into a
partum hominem. We will begin living a happy and satisfying life of
designed-ahead eternal absolute creativity.
Unfortunately, the laws of creativity may remain forever
unknown. Consequently, knowing the answer as to how creativity can
really be sped up is probably never to be had. As a matter of fact, the
hermeticity existing around the laws of creativity, is the major
stumbling block before realizing in flesh and blood, as it were, a genuine
AI. And, one may say, perish the thought. Because, imagine the world
in which machines have appropriated one of the immanent features of
the human—creativity. Need more be said?

90
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Getting back to computers, which provide the very reason to talk about
a digitized world, and where this talk about a digitized world all began,
the first thing popping-up in one’s mind is their inauspiciously humble
and very mundane beginnings in the musty offices of godforsaken
academic thinkers, especially such who fantasize that anything
practically good may come out of playing with number systems, let
alone juggling with ones and zeroes. If society, the collective, were to be
the stimulant, let alone a catalyst for such activity of an element which
society perceived more as a crackpot, rather than even some laggard
wasting his time, if society bothered more than to ignore that, in
society’s view, good-for-nothing waster of taxpayer money, apt to
satisfy his twisted curiosity at taxpayer’s expense, then there would have
been no hope to see the flourishing of something that, who could ever
believe, even turned into an industry, which some liken to no less than a
revolution.
I remember a friend of my father, solitudinous in his
enthusiasm, perceived by the others as someone not quite right in his
head, whom I could not help overhearing when he was visiting my
father. He was talking about the fantastic new world of some new way
of calculation, using some crazy binary arithmetic and boolean algebra,
dealing with even logical operations based on the binary arithmetic,
rather than the decimal arithmetic and algebra, which not only we all
knew, but it was unfathomable for anyone at the time that there could
be any alternative. And, even if there were, it could not be anything
more than a useless curiosity.
This is the important pivotal step in the genesis of the digital
world. Once this arithmetic principle based on binary numbers,
appearing as utterly trifle and unimportant, is discovered, anything else
coming out as sparkingly flamboyant, turning it into industry,
companies competing with each other for market edge, billions, trillions
of dollars in revenue, all of that is secondary. It is true, however, that,
when it comes to the practical implementation of this turning of the
academic fly into an elephant of industry, the shining role of the USA is
beyond compare. The USA, in this respect, cannot be overshadowed by
anyone. There may be an element of truth that the peculiarity of the

91
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

social system of the United States has stimulated the creation of

products, based on ideas generated outside of the United States, in the
limited businesswise and stagnant places of civilization-weary old
Europe.
As a matter of fact, computers and follow-up digitalization, are
some of the few instances when achievements of science or of activities
auxiliary to science, such as applied mathematics, are appropriated by
technology to produce utilities. Science by its very essence has no
teleological goals per se, other than the production of knowledge.
Technology, on the other hand, would lay hands on anything,
including outcomes from science, which would serve its pragmatic
ends.
However, presenting the applications of the already discovered
principles of the digital world as something possessing further
ideological significance, is overstretching the common significance of
the digital machines and methods, already appreciated by society. The
transition to online work, education, shopping, medicine and
entertainment in the environment of the already socialized idea of the
digital principles, is quite invisible as a jump, compared to the dramatic
leap from society less than adversary, not even negligent; from society
even completely unaware of the existence of a curious thing such as the
social potentialities of doing arithmetic and algebra with zeroes
and ones, to a society feeling comfortable with a method based on
non-analog, digital principles, as if such digital method has always
been around.
The significance of that giant leap should not be minimized by
embellishing the common and expected developments, stemming from
the digitization of society, already accepted as common by the world.
Finding out a way to make sneakers, not only dress shoes, is not much
of a jump in shoemaking, compared to the leap from barefoot to shoes.
Therefore, listing of industry leaders who were amazed at how
rapidly and basically changes have occurred in their industries during a
crisis, would make a good newspaper story but is unconvincing as an
argument that specifically the cov-crisis would be such stimulant. Any
crisis puts such pressures and sways the attitudes of consumers, but, as

92
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

said, it can hardly be premised that they would be a primary factor for
stimulating and speeding up of substantial innovations. One usually
doesn’t marvel at every tremble of the stock market, many times having
pretty expected explanation. The trick is to know ahead of time that such
a factor would emerge. Once one knows ahead of time that such a factor
would certainly hit the market, the knowledgeable investor knows how
to act, which may bring him a lot of money. Thus, if someone told us in
January 2020 that something like the cov-crisis will be globally promoted
in March, many of us would not have needed a CEO of any company to
tell us that, say, digital activity will go through the roof, inflicting change
on many industries.
TRIVIALITIES AND MORE TRIVIALITIES—ONLINE
ACTIVITIES—Thus, unlike the wide-eyed amazement expressed by
“thegreatresetter”, there can hardly be anything closer to mind than
figuring out that when you are forcefully blocked in your home due to
any number of reasons, not at all necessarily having anything to do with a
lockdown due to a virus, and also if you have equipment lying around,
allowing you to log on to the internet, you would indulge in “onlining”,
sometimes even binge-“onlining”. You can even go through the list of
common activities in such confinement-induced case, the way one can
list any common thing he does at all: I tied up the laces of my shoes, put
on a coat and headed to meet up with a friend, then, after meeting my
friend, I went to the gym and then on the way home, bought some
groceries, just in case. Well, if I were confined at home and I have a
mobile phone with a T-Mobile phone card, I can do a number of things,
but I don’t need to list them in a text devoted to greatly resetting the
world, as an argument to support a thesis that these very common things
I would do while confined in my apartment, symbolize some
impounding, let alone sped up, factor, signifying that the world soon will
not be the same. My buying a pound of tomatoes whether online or in
flesh and blood, would not change the fundamentals of the world we live
in. Even a million tomato-buyers will not signal such change. They may
affect the stock market a little bit, it may be an event on the futures
market, but the principles on which the world functions, at the moment,
will not change whether or not there is a crisis, let alone a cov-crisis

93
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

around, to say nothing about cov-pandemic allegedly causing this cov-

crisis being wrought with unequivocal facts which poke holes in the
thesis for its reality.
Furthermore, if we decide to devote some more time to such
common things, it should not be far from the mind that such
confinement-induced experience is inferior to the “real thing”; that is, the
usual human off-line participation in life. However, is the reiterating of
such common things bringing anything new to the conversation? The
answer is in the negative but “thegreatresetter” needs to connect that
obviousness, specifically with the alleged cov-pandemic causing cov-
crisis. “Thegreatresetter” needs to create the impression that it
is specifically the cov-crisis, none other, that is the culprit for
this confinement-induced change of lifestyle.
Is the crisis, any crisis, the reason for emerging of e-“things”?
Hardly. Did the crisis, any crisis, make us more mindful of the cellphones
and tablets lying around us, these gadgets causing us to change habits?
Hardly. Blaming cov-crisis for our mindfulness of various devices is
unsustained. Such mindfulness would trivially be in the midst of any
public health crisis influencing our lives, deliberately manufactured or
naturally occurring.
Once the reader of the “thegreatresetter’s” text, however, is
conditioned to adopt the uniqueness of the above-discussed cause-and-
effect connection, our reader may now begin, obviously the writer hopes
so, to see the inevitability of change. Hopefully, “thegreatresetter” thinks,
the reader of his text, who, reading on, will be additionally conditioned
by similar tactics, would finally conclude that the change must not be
just any change, but the change must specifically come about in no other
way but through some so-called “great reset”, caused by nothing other
than the herald of this “great reset”, the cov-pandemic. This may be well
and good as a conjecture and we may even forgive “thegreatresetter” the
omission of observing that events like the described one accompany any
crisis at all. We may forgive “thegreatresetter”, had he not been so
nonchalant regarding the reality of the pandemic, had he not taken the
cov-pandemic for granted, but instead, had looked into the unequivocal

94
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

pattern-evidence, diverging from the consolidated view that the cov-

pandemic is real and that it caused the cov-crisis, from which the world
would emerge with a “great reset”.
SECOND RATE EDUCATION—Incidentally, as
commented on below, relegating to the above-discussed confinement
measures, pushing towards the substitution of the usual off-line activity
with online, is especially inadequate with respect to education, if not
outright harmful. Saving the trouble of physically going to a business
meeting or driving to a family gathering, foregoing the gym by
exercising in front of a TV instead, or buying something online, may
bear such forced-confinement activity as a substitute, but education
cannot, no matter the fact that online education is cheaper. What good
will it do to buy spoiled tomatoes because they are cheaper?
The problem is that if someone relegates to an internet-
enhanced education, that would be a second rate education.
Furthermore, the most important disciplines from the world of
learning, physics and chemistry, cannot be taught online. Studies in
these real sciences must be accompanied by hands-on laboratory
exercises. Moreover, even studies in disciplines remote from science
require a human-to-human interaction. The education must be carried
out the old-fashioned way, even if it appears more expensive. The
cheapo-education by online courses is exactly what it really is—cheap,
low-quality and in the end, not worth it, despite its seeming
convenience. It is impossible to imagine that a mother cat or a mother
giraffe would teach their kittens or calf online. Despite the enormous
changes in humans throughout millennia, basically the human being
has remained practically the same with regard to its basic needs, let
alone physical appearance. The basic principles for its education have
also been preserved and they include personal interaction face-to-face
with the teacher. The good educational system is as conservative as it
gets. The reader should not remain with the impression that I have been
some kind of angel during my school years and there has not been a
rebellious streak in me. Every proper school is a suppressive instrument
and I couldn’t wait to get out of school. Now, after a lifetime of
experience, I understood that it is not supporting education in the

95
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

abstract sense that matters. What really matters is the quality of the
topics you are educated in. For, what good will it do to be educated in
relativity and progeny and work all your life crunching further and
further details of it, when relativity itself is unmitigated nonsense, not
worth the paper it is written on? Furthermore, what good is the rest of
science since its very fundamentals, the notions of time, space and
motion are badly scrambled by relativity and that scrambling is
advertised as the greatest science?
HYPOCRISY OF INTERNET-BASED SITES—Unlike
the enthusiasm expressed by “thegreatresetter” regarding the role of the
digital connectivity, there is nothing to celebrate in connection with the
dispassionate trivialities of the online communications, most of which
are facilitated by subscription-based websites parasitizing on the free
internet. What is so great about a website in which you are the one who
must gather your audience (and, thus, do the job of the owner of the
site for free)? To say nothing about the mass surveillance which this
kind of connectivity enhances. We will talk later about the role of this
surveillance in the widely advertised new world order of “great reset”,
and it will be seen there exactly why “thegreatresetter” is such an avid
promoter of this suppressive triviality.
Here, we will deal with some more down-to-earth moments
connected with the internet. Thus, consider, for example, the hypocrisy
of calling a stranger a “friend”, as complete strangers are unscrupulously
labeled by a subscription-based site, a parasite in the manifold of the
free internet—most of the time this “friend” being someone whose take
on life, let alone opinions on more subtle matters you would not even
think of knowing—is way overboard for anyone of average intelligence.
Thus, one way to deal away with this abnormal and inhuman way of
interaction is to have sign-ups for sites of “services” on the net
governmentally discouraged, if the government should regulate things
as “thegreatresetter” espouses; in fact, banning subscription for internet
sites should be just about the first thing which the government should
lay its hands on. The “great reset” implies governmental intervention to
the extent of overall totalitarian control, as will be discussed further in

96
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

this book. It would be curious if this kind of governmental

intervention would be on the books. Don’t hold your breath.
Government under the “great reset”, on the contrary, is bracing to
encourage even more such subscription-based internet activity,
stimulate it and even make it obligatory, because it is one of the tools for
positive identification of everyone personally and assessing his behavior
and attitudes, in order to rank him in the competition for the amount
of alms, which the government intends to turn into the only source of
income for the populace. Deliberate impoverishing the population,
including through arresting the businesses through unjustified
lockdowns, works towards this goal, aimed at planned deliberate
impoverishing of everyone so that everyone becomes the panhandler to
the government; i.e., to the elite.
MENIAL CHARACTER OF THE ONLINE MEET-UP
—To say nothing that, even if the totalitarian considerations of the role
of the internet are postponed for a moment, and one decides to
deal with its essence, it cannot escape from our notice that online,
especially by subscription-based sites, is too menial a way of
socializing among humans.
Meeting other people personally is not some habit from the
past, foreign to the modern human, a habit that can be disposed of as a
handkerchief. The necessity to breathe air or drink water is not some
contingently ingrained habit which humanity can eradicate. Personal
communications with other humans is one of the most essential needs
which humanity has to this day. It is not for no reason that solitary
confinement, even if it is cheaper for the state budget, and even if no
one would stop you from exercising alone in your prison cell, not
enjoying the fun of a gym, is instituted as one of the severest
punishments.
The new variants of the ancient CU-SeeMe computer
program, clumsily arranging on the screen the faces of people, is so
superficial and untrustworthy, as is the content itself of these CNN-
type parodies of interviews. These and similar ones are so unwatchable,
primitively offensive to the intelligence, let alone unbearably truth-
massaging, that I was forced to return, in person, my Verizon Fios
subscription cable TV-box, even if I’m still paying the same price for

97
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

the package. To say nothing of the fact that even when paying top
dollar for these subscription cable services, you are still bombarded by
waterfalls of less than silly, completely unwanted ads. One would think
that the top dollar he pays would at least ensure him commercial-free
cleanliness of the TV-experience.
The digital system is completely brainless and impassionate,
and God forbid if your very existence is to become dependent on such
detached, uncontrollable one-way acting digital system. Because this
sort of system is coming, as a central tool used by the “great reset”, there
will be more discussion on it further in this book.
SHOPPING ONLINE—How about shopping online or
banking, one may ask, addressing the ostensibly purely practical
matters, seemingly remote from totalitarian control and ideological
concerns connected with slavery? If someone needs to do that, there
probably should be a dedicated way of doing it, excluding tracing and
stalking, as is the practice today. However, even so, even if all the
security of the world were engaged in protecting your privacy, nothing
can substitute personal experience on the market, personally facing and
touching the pepper or the tomato or trying the pants on in the fitting
room, or the shirt you plan to buy. Doing online all those things,
appearing too easy but depriving you of the tangible experience one
needs, is severely degrading human life experience. No matter how
profitable and portable for business it may be, from even a purely
humanistic perspective it should not be encouraged, let alone be
enthusiastic about it. Sheepishly being in awe of these degrading
trivialities, unjustifiably calling the programmers carrying out such
craft-like activities geniuses, is unseemly for a political commander of
society or for any decision-maker for that matter. No one would call a
good plumber or shoemaker a genius.
PHYSICAL DISTANCING IS NOTHING NEW—
Communications technology is imposed on us but we will never truly
adopt it and get used to it. Disasters, including the artificially imposed
disasters planned with the goal to enslave everyone outside the elite, will
never change that basic essence of the human being, which at the same
time is immanently physically distanced, except for the very special cases

98
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

connected to procreation or alternative ways of intimacy. Therefore,

even the requirement that we must be physically separated at a distance,
in order to avoid the spreading of the virus causing the purported cov-
pandemic, is not anything new, as it is portrayed when one is sucking
from his fingers arguments to distinguish a new state of society caused
by a crisis, from the old state of society, when the idea of a crisis is not so
much advertised. Artificial elevating of a bespoke crisis as bringing
society into some fictitious different state, is carried out to give
justification to very crude social engineering. Without the raggedy cover
which the talk about some illusory new state of economy and life
provides, the twisting of the arm of society to shove it into the yoke of
new disagreeable rules, would meet with resistance, to say the least,
despite all the elaborate homogenization measures undertaken to
prevent it.
TRIUMPH OF TRIVIALITIES SUCH AS INTERNET,
YET ABSURDITIES GET MORE ENTRENCHED—Besides, to
celebrate the triviality of the internet is to misplace the role of the real
innovations. It cannot be repeated too much—if the information
exchange is so much speeded up, then why are the highest levels of
human cognition sinking lower and lower every year? Why are
absurdities such as relativity and progeny, as well as enemies to logic
such as quantum mechanics, not disappearing, but are finding their way
deeper and deeper into society, really devastating it both financially
and intellectually? The ease of reaching someone due to the
foreseeable advancement of communications technology makes no
sense, if the communication on the matters of substance is frozen for
years and any attempt to free the world from such insanity is viciously
arrested. There is nothing futuristic in regurgitating trivialities and
promoting their predictable developments, an example of which is the
“development” of the internet. It is even less, even opposite to
futuristic, to have absurdities get entrenched more and more,
occupying, like malignant intellectual cancer, the upper crust of the
global human thought. Who is going to propose a “great reset” where
it is really needed—in removing the absurdities such as relativity and
progeny and illogical and physically flawed quantum mechanics?

99
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

SUPPORT BY REGULATORS TAKES PLACE

ANYWAY, STIMULATED BY THE NATURAL
DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY—Therefore, the imagined
transition to the digital technology, let alone a transition to digital
technology attributed to cov-pandemic assumed as real, is not such a
simple and obvious thing as “thegreatresetter”, wishing to use it as the
underpinning of what he calls the “great reset”, might take it to be.
To say nothing of the fact that, still not having addressed the
problematic pattern-evidence, but considering the cov-pandemic as an
incontrovertible fact, “thegreatresetter” is really getting ahead of himself
in his promotion of the alleged cov-pandemic→digital-transition
connection, by suggesting that exactly that would be the reason for the
government regulators to support such transition to the digital world.
Government regulators would support such transition to the “digital”
anyway; at that, due to completely different reasons, having nothing to
do with being induced by any crisis. It is definitely not because there
might be a purported cov- or other crisis, that would spur on the
government to support and accelerate the transition to the digital
world, but, you know the drill, “if there were no such crises, the
government would not support such transition”. It may occur to
“thegreatresetter” that under different circumstances, the government
may stall in implementing the digital philosophy, but he has given no
evidence to that effect. Therefore, it appears only as wishful thinking,
in order to promote his pet “great reset” project. Digital philosophy
marches on, inevitably naturally following the inevitable technical
progress.
Besides, if the government foregoes the rigorous procedures of
implementing such an important policy, jumping the gun because of an
imagined urgency, then this is not the best government there could be.
The excuse that necessity may be forcing the implementation of
important issues, is an expression of “thegreatresetter’s” tendency to
induce panic, especially given the unanswered pattern-evidence
problems which undermine the unjustified firm conviction that the
alleged cov-pandemic is something impeccably rooted in reality.
Regulators would offer unfettered support to such unbridled
degraded version of our lives, reduced to digital subsistence, only if

100
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

these regulators are corrupt, lobbying for corporate interests. More

humanistically-oriented persons in charge of society will take some time
to separate the wheat from the chaff and not view the digital deluge as
something inevitable, emergency notwithstanding. A helping hand is
not the master. Digital trivialities should never be allowed to dominate
society in its most essential cognitive and humanistic sense. Foreseeable
technological advances, either in the form of drone delivery or as
telemedicine, let alone mobile payments, or anything else that could
come to mind, will come about anyway, but these advances should be
shown their right place in society, not wowing and open-heartedly
adopting every blip of something expected in principle, but not yet
manufactured. We are not utterly amazed at every new variety of loaf of
bread or any new brand of washing machine or fridge. There have
been revolutions during the twentieth century in the various
technologies (not in science!), but we have taken them, quite
appropriately, in stride. This is how we should continue to approach
the expected but not yet produced technical advancements in the digital
world. Trivialization of the foreseeable, in order to distinguish it from
the really innovative, is the road to true technical progress. The same
way the most efficient method to deal with the sexual aberrations, such
as selling one’s body, is not by banning them but by making them
trivial, so that everyone would lose interest in them and it would not
cross anyone’s mind to pay for such a trivial thing. This is a matter of
psychological predisposition, and the over-sexualization of our society
works in the opposite direction; namely, heroization of what are
essentially public toilets.
Of course, unlike what “thegreatresetter” does, when
discussing the possible revamping of the world, it is not necessary to get
into the nitty-gritty of what every business does and what appears as an
innovation there, unless there is a need to fill more pages with
obvious, and therefore boring things, so that the book becomes pagier
and thus thicker for a more impressive presence on one’s shelf. To
involve trivial infractions known to be due to a purported pandemic,
in order to elevate the menial details of the business minutae to the level
of being worthy as arguments regarding global issues, is even more

101
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

debasing to the task undertaken.

PATENT OFFICES ARE NOT THE WORKSHOPS
LEGISLATING SCIENCE—Incidentally, what is happening during
technological advancement, if not revolution, is the turning of the
possible, of the foreseeable, into tangible, into a real world contraption,
software program or a service, which finally may end up on the market
as a product for sale. This is a process more dependent on the invisible
juices of creativity than on relaxing or tightening of regulations.
Regulations mostly apply to already tangibly existing things, than to
things that are still in the heads of the inventors, crises or no crises. Of
course, there are ultimate regulations exercised by the patent offices,
which justifiably in most cases, disallow creativity in areas opposing the
laws of nature. It is a matter of fact that the patent offices are not offices
where science is done. The patent commissioners have to rely on what
the mainstream has pronounced to be the limits of science. As we saw,
however, there are instances in which the set limits, which the
mainstream has adopted, are absurd. It would be curious how an
average examiner would react to a patent application which is
ridiculous, for example, a patent application utilizing the absurd time-
dilation. Time-dilation, as absurd as it is, is adopted by the mainstream
as a brilliant achievement of today’s science, not at all violating the
principles adopted by the mainstream. Moreover, the examiner, having
at hand the unequivocal argument such as the one shown herewith in
the Addendum, against an actually absurd principle but which,
although absurd, the mainstream has adopted as legitimate, can at once
go against the regulations instructing the examiner to abide by what is
accepted in science. Don’t expect miracles from the examiner, especially
don’t expect that the examiner would acknowledge that there are
adopted limits which science considers legitimate, but which in reality
are no limits at all, even if the proof for that catastrophic fact stares the
examiner in the face. These problems cannot be resolved through the
patent office, neither can they be resolved in the class room. It was
already explained above why and there is even more discussion on this
problem in other books by this author (cf. “Relativity is the Mother of
All Fake News” in timeisabsolute.org and “The Pathology of Relativity

102
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

and Some Notes on General Theory of Science”).

WHAT IS REALLY THE MATTER WITH THE
INTERNET—All the above may seem well and good and, indeed, the
role of the internet may be overplayed, if not misunderstood, but what
is it that really bothers me? I will say it at once—you must be known in
some other way in order to be heard. Therefore, internet is just like any
other way of communication. Well, unlike any other way, once on the
net, your creation is at once available to billions of people across the
globe. Really? What good does it do? Even if the creation you have put
on the net contains crucial truth which is vital for humanity to know,
just making it available on the net for the billions to read will cause no
leaf to tremble in the world forest of issues the world pays attention to.
Since time immemorial, truth does not fly on its own wings. This is
worse than it sounds because the minute additional means of financial
character become necessary to have others listen to the truth, all is lost,
truth is corrupted. Truth is like a mimosa which despises the dirty
touch of money.
Unfortunately, with or without internet, the hand of the
endowment as the mover and shaker, dictates when it comes to even the
pivotal truths of humanity. This idea of monetary governance can never
be reconciled in the heart of the real scientist with the purity of truth. A
publishing company, radio or TV, all of it turns around one axis—
money. The same applies in full strength to the internet. You must own
or at least control the territory and all of its paraphernalia of
distribution from which you intend to broadcast your ideas. It was
sheer naïveté on the part of the President of the United States to
broadcast his messages from a subscription site which he doesn’t own or
personally control. You cannot be on the territory of the enemy and
expect fair play, no matter what you’ve been told about the American
democracy. Paradoxically, the President thought that this is the way to
avoid the adversarial media, not in the least a friend of truth. This
exposed him to unheard of humiliation. Hopefully, in the
future, this episode will teach a good lesson and will be a warning to
anyone who has something important to say.
For those who wonder if the mass media is indeed not a friend

103
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

of the truth, there can be no more convincing proof than the fact that
the world mass media uses its propaganda might to foist the lie that
relativity and progeny is the greatest science there is, while the immediate
absolute truth is that relativity is a disgraceful brazen absurdity and
nonsense, as seen in the Addendum. Thus, any time someone tries to
portray the mass media in all its forms—in radio, TV, internet or printed
matter—as the center irradiating truth, one must immediately raise the
absolute argument presented in the Addendum, proving that
mainstream media in all its forms lies and promotes deceptive conspiracy
theories regarding the most important question of humanity—the
essence of time and space.
INTERDEPENDENCE—EXPECTED, UNIDIRECTIONAL,
NOT INEVITABLE—One is always keen on ruminating regarding
matters which appear global, although one cannot exactly tell why. So,
we will enjoy ourselves a little with some similar thoughts. Take, for
instance, the apparent interdependence amongst the countries in the
world, so much emphasized by “thegreatresetter”. It should be evident
that the interdependence is a consequence of the production capital
looking for the cheapest workforce. The possibility for such outflow of
capital into foreign territories is ensured by political factors leading to
reshaping the map of the world. The interdependence on a personal level
is negligible, compared to the industrial interdependence today ensured
by political penetration, in search of cheaper labor, into virgin territories
which earlier were seriously separated from one another in different
political and military formations and blocks. The most interesting, if not
most powerful and important, interconnection, is the one between the
United States and China, started by the opening of China during the
Nixon era. Of course, it would be oversimplification to ascribe that
opening to Nixon alone. The opening of China is, at the end of the day,
politically speaking, the doing of the “deep state” of the United States,
the “deep state” which services the military-industrial complex,
ultimately handled by the super-wealthy elite as the general protector of
its power and privileges. There is nothing sentimental or unusual in that
act of opening. It follows the natural flow of capital towards the cheaper
labor and the reverse flow of the produced goods towards the market

104
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

which pays the highest price.

“Thegreatresetter” takes this interconnection as a given and as a
result of some great advance during the twenty first century, while the
origins of this interconnection are entirely pragmatic and not at all
inevitable. Under different global circumstances, there might not have
been such interconnection, rather, interdependence. The
interdependence in question is especially not a by-product of the
technological progress. Its origin is purely political, serving the natural
tendency of the companies to seek cheaper labor. Being purely political,
such interdependence cannot be initiated by a weaker country but is
only the result of the will of the stronger country, which would
penetrate into the weaker country as much as the overall socio-political
circumstances allow. There is, of course, resistance on the part of the
weaker country, which is the reason the stronger country restricts itself
to only exploiting the labor market, instead of taking over the entire
weak country in the form of a colony, entirely absorbing it as part of its
territory. As for globalization, this is a companion term, to describe
briefly the above unilateral process. The phenomenon in question,
known as globalization, is a one-way street for exploitation and a reverse
one-way street for bringing the cheaply produced goods into the
territory of the powerful country, with the intent to maximize the
profits—produce cheap, sell expensive. How much simpler could it be,
if the question is stripped from its oppressive essence, explaining how
this benignly appearing process of producing and selling in fact takes
place? In this sense, it is not a reciprocal dependence but is always
asymmetric, skewed toward the stronger “partner”.
INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND COMPLEXITY—
STRONGER VS. WEAKER NATION—It is a recurring theme to
attribute the difference in contemporary economy as compared to
earlier economies, to some greater interconnectedness and complexity.
Notwithstanding technology, which is constantly in development and
which is the motor of change throughout centuries, the most profound
difference in today’s economy compared to earlier ones, is the
globalization of slavery, spelled out simply as “globalization”—stronger
nations encroaching on weaker ones in the ever expanding propensity

105
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

for cheap labor, raw materials and markets. This tendency is greatly
enhanced, even causing it, by immense global political changes in the
direction of expanding to new territories, virgin from the point of view
of the principles espoused by the West, while staunchly preserving the
political essence of the West. All these ostensibly new movements, in
fact, serve that character and domination of the West, especially of the
United States. Same old, same old, in new clothes. Indeed, consider, for
example the firm stay of the 12 monarchies in Europe—an old chestnut
in a new globalization attire.
Neither the concerns for preservation of nature, turned into a
political tool, as well as any other of the hypocritical concerns we are
bombarded with, nor the expected effect of air travel or the malignant
urban expansion, goes against the vector pointing to conquering new
slave territories and the consolidation of the core of the world exploiter.
Even the theatrical attempts to oppose this vector through “new
normals” of “great resets” and the like, in fact, lead to its further
entrenchment. The least such ravaging of the new territories will do is to
solve the problems of the world. It aggravates these problems, despite
some showcases, used to demonstrate propagandistically to the world
that this new expansion lifts out of poverty certain segments of the
population in formerly poor regions. A beast can have no compassion.
The only problem for the beast is that by such sort of expansion, it
creates its copycat beasts, which, like China, may in time begin to pose a
major threat to its creator. Devastation tendencies are always easier to
copy. Furthermore, the beastly phenomenon becomes especially curious
when it outgrows its copycat phase and these devastation tendencies
begin to evolve naturally, due to the essence of the new creation, not just
as a copy. These battles of the titans—an expanding beast against the
monster it created—is what underlies all else that has happened,
especially in recent history.
In many ways, the difficulties the West is experiencing today are
self-inflicted and one wonders if they could be avoided by taking a
different, more clever route, or they are intrinsic to the system for which
there is no clever way—any alternative way of development that could
have been invented, would have been again a creation of the same system,

106
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

leading to similar self-inflicted wounds. Besides, the things of the

unidirectional slave tendencies, the so-called globalization, have gone too
far for the implementation of protectionist self-containment—an
alternative to the sprawling vector of globalism. The beast of globalism is
already beyond its puberty, it is too strong and will never allow the loot
to be taken away from it. That beast is ready to even induce economic
catastrophes in the form of “great resets”, in order to preserve itself and
reorganize for even tighter grip on the world. In this sense, the perceived
economic catastrophe of today, being opportunistically cov-crisis-self-
inflicted, has nothing to do with periodic crises characterizing the natural
run of classical capitalism. The self-inflicted character of today’s crisis,
aiming at preserving and developing of what make-believe critics of
capitalism (in fact enhancing its totalitarian character of enslavement of
everyone, this time globally) have achieved throughout the past decades,
is what makes the current crisis unique, defying any conceptual parallels
with former crises, save some superficial similarities. “Thegreatresetter”
uses these parallels with former crises to the extent of probably
unwittingly overturning his own thesis, which is correct but, as said, for a
different reason, of the uniqueness of the cov-pandemic compared to all
else, used now specifically as a tool for the enhancement of a greater
slavery-oriented global world. He claims that, throughout history,
pandemics have been “great resetters”, however, what he really means is
that pandemics in history have been “great re-starters”, something which
he specifically denies upon the introduction of the term “great reset”.
During “the great re-starts”, taking place after earlier epidemics, there has
never been destruction of the basic laws governing the markets, as is the
essence of the “great reset” proposal of today. The “great re-starts”,
after previous pandemics, saw economy and life return to its “old
normal”, including honoring of GDP as a measure of development, any
changes in the system occurring due to factors other than the ravaging
consequences of the pandemic having no effect. On the contrary, today,
as “thegreatresetter” himself explains, discussed in this book under the
heading “Further repercussions—anti-capitalist sentiments”, the post
cov-crisis should incur, according to him, profound governmental
intervention (in effect ultimate totalitarianism) into the workings of the

107
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

market, directing it towards the collectivistic principles of ideologies and

practices foreign to the very fundamentals of capitalism, long-term after-
effect of the usual pandemics notwithstanding. Of course, attempts are
sensed in “thegreatresetter’s” writings to look for similarities in the social
milieu due to earlier post-pandemic consequences, on the one hand, and
on the other, the changes of the social public-private relations of the post
cov-crisis postulated by him. However, the described former struggles of
labor were part of the traditional overall labor battles with capital. Thus,
never was there such drastic centralized governmental intervention, as the
one postulated by “thegreatresetter” to occur as a result of the “great
reset”, into the character of the market and the laws it is driven by, aging
of the population or other accompanying factors notwithstanding. By the
way, when “thegreatresetter” now conjectures that it is not certain that
the post cov-crisis will tip the balance in favor of labor against capital,
he’d better recall what he was postulating those consequences of “the
great reset” would certainly be (cf. again “Further repercussions—anti-
capitalist sentiments”), whereby the whole market principle, according to
him, will certainly be skewed towards labor. The just pointed out
example of preemptive appearance of playing both sides of the issue, can
be observed in more than one place in the writings of “thegreatresetter”.
We will see more of that play when it comes to the artificially instilled
panic and the environment in “Artificially instilled panic”.
GLOBAL COOPERATION OR GLOBAL
GOVERNANCE?—The difference between global cooperation and
governance should go without saying, but needs to be repeated in view of
the apparent muddling. What might be the reason for such muddling can
only be speculated about, although mitigating anything which sounds
like “ordnung”, the German word for order, by substituting such term,
loaded with implication of terrifying images of the past, by milder
expressions, is always helpful politically, avoiding the knee-jerk reaction
of psychological resistance from the reader.
Thus, instead of talking of the rough reality of governance,
“thegreatresetter” speaks of cooperation. However, there is a vast
difference between cooperation and governance. Global governance
cannot be a process of cooperation, unless the former does not mean

108
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

what it says. Cooperation truly means equal positioning of the

participants in a shared process. Governance presupposes hierarchy. If we
are concerned about resolving global issues, then cooperation indeed may
be the answer. However, judging from what is suggested in
“thegreatresetter’s” text, this is not what is meant to occur in the post cov-
crisis world. For example, a company receiving a loan from the
government with a covenant attached to that loan, as specified by
“thegreatresetter”, is not cooperation, but governance. Neither is it
cooperation by the government to replace fiat money and encrypted
currencies by non-encrypted digital money, as an example of one of the
ways of dealing away with privacy.
The lament of “thegreatresetter” is that the world is like an
orphan in need of guidance because “we live in a world in which nobody
is really in charge” makes him hypocritically offer to deal with that in a
“collective fashion”. At the very same time, however, he proposes
practical ways of removing privacy as a way to give the missing guidance
to the world, allowing for mass surveillance by the government, installed
by the wealthy elites, which resembles cooperation as much as war
resembles peace, and a lie resembles truth.
“Thegreatresetter” suggests that cov-pandemic has reminded us
of the global character of a number of issues. It might have reminded us
of something, had the cov-pandemic been something coming out of real
medical emergency, and not just made to look like it has medical roots.
The cov-pandemic more likely is reminding us that there is a small
wealthy elite, which can make up stories which it is capable of imposing
on the world to its own ends. The mass-media incessantly pouncing on
the population that cov-pandemic is real, caused by a new unheard of
pandemic-causing viral agent, as if there were no unheard of viral agents
in the past causing pandemics, does not cut the mustard in relieving us
from such a reminder. On the contrary, there is absolute unequivocal
evidence, which although not definitive with respect to the overall
problem, speaks in the opposite direction.
WESTERN VS. EASTERN GOODS—
INTERCONNECTIVITY AND INTERDEPENDENCE—What
was the difference in the 1960s and on between the East and the West
from the point of view of an ordinary citizen? During those years, when

109
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

you entered an eastern store and looked around, you didn’t want to buy
anything, while being in a western store you wanted to buy everything. In
addition to the abundance seen in the western stores, conflicting with the
chronic deficit of the eastern places of retail, the western goods were
characterized by exceptional quality, which the East could never achieve,
save the agricultural produce which, also suffering from chronic deficit,
had an exceptional quality in the East. The food had unmatched taste,
preserved by comparatively more primitive, rustic ways, as opposed to the
industrialized way of having even agriculture’s functioning in the West.
Today we can barely match that quality and taste even by our “organic”
produce on the shelves of the grocery stores and supermarkets.
“Thegreatresetter” also laments about such days of lesser industrialization
and seems to praise industrial de-growth in the midst of the rest of his
“great reset” global theorizing, right in the spirit of the post-industrial
society mantra going on for decades. As said, “great reset” brings nothing
new in principle, when it comes to post cov-crisis state of affairs. There is
more said on this ludicrous de-industrialization proposal in “Puzzling
reminder of Unabomber’s manifesto in the official considering of de-
growth”.
During the last decades of the twentieth century, everything
changed. The innovative slavery imposed on China initially, began
diluting the western market with low quality cheap goods, which were
making humungous profits, especially on the American market. The
situation reversed itself. Now, the goods sold in the West, especially in the
United States, are of poor quality, while the goods sold in the East,
perhaps mostly due to the German industry, became the leader in quality,
although China has an input in their production as well. Of course, I am
expressing here my personal impressions, while this effect on quality of
the globalists’ stimulated China invasion should be studied more
thoroughly, on a wider scale.
As already pointed out, the interdependence, which
“thegreatresetter” is falsely presenting as some mutually beneficial happy
co-existence, has arisen only due to the new slavery, stimulated by the
global companies searching for the cheapest, not necessarily the most
qualified, labor. No wonder the quality of goods has undergone

110
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

tremendous downturn with the advent of the new slavery. Manhattan

looks like a Chinese colony, flooded with cheap low-quality goods. The
inevitable downfall toward cheaper and unqualified labor, makes it
inevitable for the American buyer to be exposed to low-quality products,
which he cannot avoid because he is not given a choice—the low quality is
overwhelming and is ambushing all market avenues.
Interconnection is trivial and mentioning it is not bringing
cognitive advancement in assessing the world situation, especially bringing
it as a factor of progress. A shining example is the impossibility to un-
entrench the absurdities occupying physics, despite the growing inter-
connectedness. On the contrary, the process of entrenchment of absurdity
and senselessness seems to be steadily growing with the growth of the
interconnectedness. Therefore, currently, the interconnectedness brings
mostly bad effects, rather portraying it as good by “thegreatresetter”.
OVERBLOWN PROPAGANDA OF WORLD
CONNECTIVITY—As a matter of fact, this insidiousness, allowing not
only the persistence, but even the further entrenchment of absurdities, of
the purportedly most powerful communications milieu said to
characterize our times, as compared to any time in history, shows how
overblown the propaganda is that we are living in a communications so-
called revolution, in an ever interconnecting and interdependent world.
Thus, basking in the bliss of interconnectedness and considering
interdependence inevitable, is quite superficial. If we imagine, for the sake
of discussion, that there is no greed and the driving force is only pure
progress, then, imagining the closed production of goods within the
United States is an entirely plausible alternative. It would be a better
alternative because it would pick up the American standard where it was
left in the nineteen seventies and will restore its leadership of world
excellence. The dissipation of the American innovativeness and
entrepreneurship into the wide world took place only to accommodate the
beastly greediness of selfish companies. Of course, it is utopian to think
that companies may have agendas other than profit and that if you make
the world profitless, then it would make the downfall of the evil
globalization inevitable. As long as there are private companies, their
turning into profitless enterprises is just an illusory non sequitur.

111
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

Therefore, let us not be hypocritical and present the interdependence, as

much as it is inevitable under the conditions we live in today, as a good
thing. It is a bad thing, it stalls progress, and because we are a human race,
caring about our future and advancement, we must think of ways to get
out of it. The vicious interdependence brought about by greed, is the very
risk itself. A rational company, devoted also to higher good alongside
profit, would settle for less profit, but will have as its ideal the quality of
what it produces. Because the citizen has no choice and is cornered to buy
only low quality goods, there is no competition on the basis of quality and
the market is skewed today. This globalism, the child of the post-industrial
society world, destroys the whole economy, even if the additional
destruction of the market by the totalitarian imposition of the “non-
capitalist capitalism” of the “great reset” did not take place. Even if
financial operators may be faring well under post-industrial ways of
society, no civilization can fare at all if it does not produce tangible goods
of ever improving quality, not just any quality pushed on a cornered
market which has no other choice.
As for the pandemic, as a result of the interconnectedness of sorts,
involving not only virtual but also physical contact, which is touted as a
satellite problem of the interdependence, at the end of the day all boils
down to the question—is there really a pandemic—and the answer is a
resounding, no, if the definition of pandemic is that there must be
epidemic in every one of the countries of the world. The impassionate
absolute data—the total number of deaths from all causes—definitively
prove that there is no pandemic abiding by the above definition. In the
pristine initial picture for the months since March 2020, when the
health systems were still not mangled, there are countries whereby no
anomalies are seen in the run of the number of deaths from all causes as a
function of time (cf. Fig.1), to say nothing of the fact that in the countries
where anomalies are seen, there is no guarantee that these anomalies are
not due to the worsened conditions of healthcare due to the impositions of
lockdowns and other restrictive measures. Why were there maximums in
the pattern-evidence plots in some countries during the initial months
after March 2020, while there were no such maximums in many other
countries (cf. Fig.1 through 12), must be a matter of serious honest study,

112
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

unaffected by corporate, globalist and vested interests.

Therefore, any decision-maker must first assess the situation from
the prism of considering the greed factor, and the first impression would be
that dissipation of industries throughout the world is imminent
because they are seeking the regions of least resistance, which in their
lingo means the lowest salaries. This inevitably soaks the industrial capital
in the deserts of the underdeveloped world. This may seem good, as a
way to pull that underdeveloped world up from the menace of poverty.
However, this is as much a moving up, as is the advancement
hypocritically offered to a slave still kept in slavery. A responsible
decision-maker would look into the complexity of the problem and
will not take the path of least resistance. Why should there be any need
for a decision-maker if the decisions follow what is expected, which anyone
can foretell?
GLOBALIZATION—THE OTHER WORD FOR SLAVERY
—“Thegreatresetter” is talking endearingly about globalization as a benign
simple exchange of goods, capital, people, services and data. However,
behind this mask is a severe exploitation of modern slaves. These slaves may
see some escape from poverty, but this is at the expense of dramatic
impoverishment of the people living in the lands where the slavedrivers
came from. Interconnectedness is no excuse for instituting slavery, which
drives down societies, being itself inhuman notwithstanding. No
interconnectedness, no interdependence, can erase the power differential
between the slave and its owner. While the inevitable sides of mutual
interaction in a more technologically enhanced world are trivial to
appreciate, the use of these achievements to enslave peoples is impossible
not to meet with resistance. As such resistance aggravates, those who
started the enslavement may wonder, if they are inclined to soberly analyze
the situation, if that whole operation was worth it, or a better and more
sustainable way of communication and exchange between peoples of the
world could be found. For instance, instead of delegating the production
to less qualified but also less paid slave workforce, the more sophisticated
home work-force could produce quality goods and the underdeveloped
world be helped to implement its own programs of advancement. There
are ways to handle the immensely enhanced speed of financial transactions
across borders, which in its present form is a disaster waiting to happen. To

113
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

do that analysis properly, there is only one way—employ the services of

science and its taper, the truth, first to honestly assess the limitations of the
analysis itself. Letting unbridled anarchy rule the international markets is a
recipe for collapse. The honest scientific analysis would curb that
anarchical tendency. Furthermore, the scientific analysis cannot be honest
and of high integrity unless science itself has not cleaned its territory from
the entrenched absurdities concerning its basic notions, starting with the
mangled notions of time and space. Straightening out basic notions may
seem remote to the practical needs of putting reigns to anarchy in
the markets, but is not. Straightening out thinking, basing it on
correct fundamentals, is the litmus test which guarantees that the
further extensions of reasoning will be correct. In the real world of finance,
wrong syllogisms, let alone wrong concepts participating in any
syllogisms, are fatal and foretell disaster. Markets have their own logic, but
no matter how fuzzy it may seem at times, non sequiturs cannot be
part of it. They shudder the markets and, in the end, make markets
collapse.
“MORE EQUITABLE GLOBALIZATION”—Having
globalization as the pivotal topic of promotion, “thegreatresetter”
nevertheless admits to “hyper-globalization” of the world. As a cure, he
proposes a “more equitable” globalization. And, pray tell, what might that
kind of globalization be? The answers “thegreatresetter” gives are either
questionable (environmental agreements asymmetrically harming the
West) or ridiculous tax havens (havens, yes, but for money-laundering and
tax-cheats). Public health globalization is a misnomer, but to where did
globalization of science disappear? Where did the factual existing
globalization of nonsense and the absurd, presented as science, disappear
to? Does this disappearance of the concern that science must not be held
hostage to nonsense, as it is held now globally, also fall under the rubric of
“more equitable” globalization? Of course, it does. As said,
“thegreatresetter”, with his “great reset”, of which the “more equitable”
globalization is a part, doesn’t give a hoot about science and truth. On the
contrary, the “great reset” is about un-truth, stimulates it, and cares only
about world dominance and unfettered privilege for the super-wealthy
elite.

114
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

SPEEDING UP TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS—As far as

speeding up the technological progress after the opening of a number of
countries, it is due to the

• amassing of greater profits by the dominant force due to the

asymmetry in question

That asymmetry is alternatively known as globalization. The insatiable

avarice of the companies, out to get greater and greater profits, brings
sometimes pathological forms of this interconnection.
Although some “greatresetters” also view the interconnected world
as “concatenated”, that term is not appropriate because it implies equal
positioning of the different interconnected parties, which is never the case.
Even saying that interconnected is another way of saying “linked together”
is not exact, because interconnected in the present context, that of
globalization, presupposes hierarchy which the expression “linked together”
defies. If a boat analogy, seen in “thegreatresetter’s” text, is to be used and
one imagines those almost two hundred countries inhabiting various
cabins, these cabins belong to different classes.
Today, asymmetries exist also in the individual cabins, within the
countries themselves, as well as they have existed from a historical
perspective. The former asymmetry, the asymmetry within a country,
should be evident to everyone. Regarding the latter, historically, consider
the airports. They are the physical intersection points where the exchange
of airborne viruses is immensely more intense than elsewhere in the country
and there are many more airports today than in the past. Travel is eminently
more intense today. Yet, whatever it is that happened in 2020, is
incomparable to the devastation in 1918-1919. It may be added also that
there is obvious asymmetry in pollution in China, compared to that in the
West.
As far as risks go, it has never been that economic risks do not go
hand in hand with political or health risks. The world appears widened
today due to the expansion of the multinational corporations, but has that
led to more homogeneity and less asymmetry? To say nothing of the fact
that one may live in Manhattan and will not only not feel what

115
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

happens in Yemen, but will not even know that anything devastating is
going on there. The mass media is making known only a very small
percentage of what is happening in the world, ignoring everything else—the
media makes known only what suits elite’s agenda. The individual lives in
the world created by the media, not in the real world. This makes his vision
of the world skewed. Even today, with the advent of communications, the
citizen is served only with the picture of the world which the powerful of
the day want him to have, rampant censoring control even of the
supposedly free internet by physical banning or due to flooding the internet
with non-sequiturs, efficiently sinking in its maw anything that really
matters. While it is understandable that one cannot bear at once all the
troubles of the world, the world has real trouble points, which must not be
left unnoticed. However, they are deliberately left unnoticed by the
mainstream media; that is, the media that makes a difference when
informing the multitude and shaping up its worldview, and the picture of
the world presented by the media does not at all present the real structure of
the trouble spots. On the contrary, the media is even creating make-believe
trouble spots where there are none, at the expense of places with very
serious problems. A disaster in London will always have much more
coverage than a similar, if not way much greater disaster in Somalia. The
asymmetry, in this respect, is so evident that it is cynical to present it as non-
existent.
It is obvious that “thegreatresetter” needs to convince us of what he
calls, “contagion by systemic connectivity” but that doesn’t stand scrutiny.
The world today is, in fact, more divided and disconnected than ever. That
is additionally instilled due to deliberate social manipulations, made-up
local and global crises and deliberately maintaining confusion in the basics
of science, chasing truth out of science and therefore out of society, while
talking out of the other side of its (of elite’s propaganda) mouth.
AUTOMATIZATION, ROBOTIZATION AND COV-CRISIS—
Oh, and, by the way, speaking of everyday things, it is not the need for
people to stay at a distance from each other (to avoid contracting a disease)
that causes the drive for automation in companies. Such development is
natural for the industry, crisis or no crisis, despite “thegreatresetter”
conjecturing the opposite; namely, that it is the need for physical distancing

116
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

This is notwithstanding the old-fashioned concerns that destroying the

unity of workers is at the basis of the destruction of their potential to be
organized into a revolutionary force—in opposition to the peasants who are
immanently scattered and therefore, there are no concerns about
destruction of their non-existing unity, ergo, rendering peasants of no
revolutionary potential anyway.
Also, if we surmise, as “thegreatresetter” does, that a crisis due to an
airborne-spreading disease would be a factor for speeding up of the
robotization, we would also be wrong. That speeding up by no means is
specific to the cov-pandemic.
In general, the fact that a specific coronavirus happened to invade
humanity, even if it really did reach pandemic proportions, which goes
contrary to what one sees in the pattern-evidence, alleged that coronavirus
induced cov-pandemic cannot be considered a trigger to some
flabbergasting new social phenomenon labeled “great reset”. The
embellishment of any public medical happenstance would cause inflation of
terms, marking historic changes. In such a case, every microbe invading
humanity would be deemed an agent of a dramatic change.
It is also quite speculative to attribute to a natural or a human-
induced disaster the relegation of low-cost labor to robots. Pandemic or not,
businesses flow towards the lower cost “labor”, independent of who the
laborer is. If the low cost “laborer” happens to be a robot, so be it. A
business will not sneeze at using the lower cost labor, be it delivered by the
robot, even in the most virus-free atmosphere there could ever be. The
intrinsic interests of the businesses is what dictates their behavior and,
provided there is cheap labor and conducive “soil” for business, the latter
will flow there, independent of the openness or closeness of the country or
whether robots replace living people. Business is dispassionate and stateless,
and I am not the first to say that. If someone attempts to stand in the way of
this natural flow, he is mercilessly expelled from the system, sometimes in

117
  Acceleration of Human Thought 

disgrace, including through elections which are not “rigged” but are only
“fortified”, in the words of the coup d’état-plotters themselves.
One can read texts in which their writers go gaga over every
industrial detail described as innovative in the mass media. There are endless
lists enumerating the different widely promoted known achievements which
makes the reader become cognizant that skipping these pages would be the
best time-saving strategy. The first thought that crosses one’s mind when
reading these common stories is not so much that the author has been paid
to write about them, as boring as they are, but that the author is fawning to
the insurmountable power these companies possess. All that has nothing to
do with crises, least of all cov-crisis. Development of technology has other
roots and stimuli, which are also not those of the “great reset”. “Inclusive
capitalism”, dropping profit as the only goal of the company and
considering the environment and the others outside the shareholders, can be
imposed only externally, by a centralized governmental, totalitarian control,
and the stimuli of a planned economy. It would be curious, to say the least,
to see if the part of the elite holding such self-preserving, albeit utopian, if
not undemocratic, ideas, is powerful enough to implement them in practice.
The problem is that such totalitarian control is realized nowadays not only
by a mere easily implementable invasion of privacy, which is annoying
enough to begin with. The ubiquitous privacy violation, building of
databases for the behavior of every company and individual, can be used for
far more insidious matters of coercion than the mere study and direction of
the consumer habits of the observed. China can easily implement such
control because it follows from its system. However, it is hardly plausible to
expect that the Chinese totalitarian control would be towards destroying
market capitalism, in order to weaken it, as are the ideas for the totalitarian
control in the West, with its ideas uncharacteristic for capitalism, destructive
for the market.

118
ELEMENTS OF THE “GREAT RESET”

 Increase of Government to the Extent of Totalitarian Rule 

Below, we will begin dealing with the suspicion, which is developed

further in this book, that it is not at all evident that all that virus
brouhaha is not instituted with the intention to impose big government
through using the turmoil and fear, helping to stage coup
d’état’s, aimed at removing inconvenient politicians at the helm, not
the other way around—a natural disaster causing a naturally expected
change. Further down, we will provide concrete pattern-evidence which
additionally stokes such suspicions.
All the global turmoil, blamed on a viral agent, resembles more
the brainchild of a private-public partnership, which is a big
questionable way of governmental control in principle, not only in the
case discussed here. The theses, arriving from such partnership, are
presented as postulates and are imposed by the power of the state.
These are just like the theses of a totalitarian state, allowing just as much
recoil from society; i.e., none. The thing to notice is that the outcome of
this dictate, utilizing private (only very wealthy, at that) forces
intertwined with the government, in the current case of impending
“great reset”, is not some theoretical program but is something very
practical, laid out to happen, as if said outcome has been proven beyond
doubt as necessary, even inevitable.
On the contrary, the most noticeable of all things, is that the
very first element justifying such dictate, the cov-pandemic/cov-crisis
connection, is based on a premise, although appearing as if iron clad,
which possesses obvious countering evidence—pattern-evidence—with
which we will deal shortly. The dramatic problem is that questions of
life and death are presented as if they must obviously be resolved in a
given way, shown exclusively by the elite, while the objective facts, such

119
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

as pattern-evidence, point to the opposite—the problem foisted in need

of solving does not seem to even exist. The medical problem shown to
be in need of solving, is something hardly above the usual, and the
created problems denoted as cov-crisis have an artificial origin, resting
exactly in that mentioned public-private partnership. We will see
shortly what the actual suppressive goals of that public-private
partnership are. Thus, if it were not for the visible dimensions of the
cov-crisis, caused by the said public-private partnership, the text of
“thegreatresetter” would have been only a benign, incorrect academic
writing, had it not been presented as direct guidance for
implementation of ruinous policies by governments. It is as absurd as
proposing governmental social measures based on conclusions which
cannot even exist, erroneously claimed to follow from the absurd
relativity. Who would want social implementation, based on absolutely
proven wrong, let alone absurd, premises? Well, it turns out that with
enough money at play, anything is possible, and the landslide is so
massive that it is not humanly achievable to stop it.
Speaking of science, some often insist that greater prosperity
depends on science. They are wrong. Greater prosperity depends on
technology and thank God for that, because if prosperity depended on
science, then, with the crushed science we have, we would have been in
rags, if we were at all managing to stay alive. In this respect, society is
lucky that relativity is not instrumental in shaping general governmental
policies, aside from its incurring enormous waste regarding the narrow
front of the public science policy, completely destroyed by the travesty
its proponents have the nerve to call science.
What are we to do with premises, the elements of which are
obviously objectively wrong, but are used as a basis for changing
governmental policies? What shall we do with such obvious
manipulation?
Obvious and easy answers to these questions, because life
is short, is to take their fascism for granted, like a “white whale” that
you can’t fight directly with your little life, lower the curtains in the
room, sit depressed on the sofa and be in compliance.
It is true that the power of fascism is too great to even think of

120
  Totalitarian Government 

confronting it head on. However, as long as you are alive, no one can
stop you from thinking and, in this way, attaining personal liberty
which cannot be taken away from you. At least for the foreseeable
future, the fascist governors and their algorithms, which we will discuss
shortly, cannot reach so deep as to figure out what your thoughts are
and have you punished for them.
Conversely, if you decide to go along the second, the
independent and dignified route, the most prudent approach to follow
is to look for absolute truths, truths which you can judge for yourself,
see with your own eyes, and which no one can dispute. This is the road
taken in this book, backed by the best unequivocal proof there could
ever be—the proof, shown in the Addendum, for the absurdity of
relativity and progeny. This proof concerns a matter of ultimate public
interest and import, although the proof has received zero citizenship
yet, due to various extra-scientific reasons, not only because systematic
subversive work was done throughout a whole century to entrench
relativity in the mind of society as the epitome of genius science,
viciously ignoring its brazen absurdity. This entrenchment persists to
this day, despite the immediate proof that relativity is the epitome of
nonsense occupying science, and that cannot be argued on any ground.
One can argue the aesthetical qualities of a painting, music piece or
fiction literature, but the absurdity of relativity is cut and dried.
One may even wonder, why, since the absurdity of relativity is
cut and dried, does one need to even bother to fight for its recognition
by society, especially considering that society today is completely
nonchalant about the truth and still perceives far and wide that
relativity is a genius theory? Such a question, of course, may be asked,
but the answer, along with saying that one who has discovered a truth
of such importance, must feel the social responsibility to disseminate it,
may be sought with Galileo, Copernicus or Lavoisier. Why did these
great men of thought need to convince the world of their discoveries, to
say nothing of Giordano Bruno, who was ready to burn at the stakes for
his ideas countering the official doctrine?
In addition to the foundation, with the argument given in the
Addendum, which this book lays out as an unassailable bedrock of

121
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

truth, against which all attempts at undermining the fact that truth is
real, crash their masts, this book, and that is the concrete reason for
writing it, tries to do what it can in finding the absolute truths regarding
cov-pandemic. The cov-pandemic is a problem of lesser overall global
significance. Nevertheless, as any pandemic, it is an always very complex
public health problem. This time, the notion of pandemic, real or
imagined, was elevated, through the assistance of privately owned global
media, as a major public health problem, in order to be used as a political
baseball bat by the desperate, tiny super-wealthy elite, determined to
upkeep and ingrain forever its rule over the world by using whatever it
takes, even if it were to eventually institute what is to be the rudest,
most invasive form of totalitarian control ever known. Why was 2020
chosen for this direct global assault? The answer is obvious—2020 was
an election year, when at stake was the very post-industrial society with
its post-modernism and globalization. The goal was to reinstitute a state
of society wearing these titles, which mean, almost synonymously, the
same thing when being substituted by a joint term, the “great reset”. By
the way, connecting the “great reset” with the harshest totalitarianism, is
a topic of many analyses. However, it is rarely realized, if at all, what the
real practical mechanism is, that has been figured out by the elite for that
totalitarian control to be implemented, a mechanism, a subject of
discussion later in this book. It is shocking. This time the elite thinks it
had it made, after the earlier unsuccessful attempts at totalitarianism in
Europe during the twentieth century. This time, the super-wealthy
Davos elite thinks, their totalitarian control will last forever. This, of
course, remains to be seen.
In addition, it need not even be mentioned again (cf.
“ACCUSER IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES BREAKS HIS VILE
TOOTH IN RELATIVITY”), that the absolute truths found to defend
a thesis, especially the absolutely unequivocal truth that relativity is
absurdity, are an absolute protection against the handiest accusation, the
accusation of conspiracy theorism, which the conscienceless good-for-
nothings, having nothing else to do, would try to direct at any critic
of relativity, with the goal to discredit that critic.

122
  Totalitarian Government 

REDEFINING SOCIAL CONTRACT—The person who

has taken the second route, the “non-compliance” route of seeking the
truth, may, for instance, ask, where is the evidence that the cov-pandemic
apparent hoax was not imposed, in order to make it appear inevitable
that social contract must be redefined? This question is answered
naturally when confronted by the data in “PATTERN-EVIDENCE
FOR THE SAME PERIOD WHEN “GREAT RESET” IDEA WAS
BORN” pointing to faux-cov-pandemic. Is the faux-cov-pandemic the
amplifier of pre-existing conditions for social turmoil?
Therefore, while the finding of the catastrophic adverse fact
about relativity tells us unequivocally that Lorentz-transformations-
based-projects must not be funded, especially publicly, in the case of the
virus doctrine used to induce social change, there is real uncertainty on
the part of everyone involved, despite the fact that speculators, playing
with power, use it to impose their vision. On top of it, there are elements
of this doctrine, which are unequivocally debunked by unquestionable
objective facts.
As a result, we see that the adoption of un-corrupted real
scientific thinking, recognizing the reality of truth now becomes a really
serious matter, and begins affecting the life of everyone of us. While
governments can be manipulated to waste billions of dollars for fake
science, without causing any visible effect on everyone’s life, and
everyone can afford to be non-scientific and make fun of whether or not
there is truth, when the questions become a matter of life and death, one
can no longer afford the luxury of neglecting real science, respectively,
truth, and relegate progress only to technology. Playing with “social
contract” without correct thinking based on real science, becomes
playing with fire.
In contrast, “thegreatresetter”, contrary to what was just said
about ignoring unequivocal evidence, cannot wait to draw conclusions
that suit his agenda. Never mind unequivocal evidence which speaks to
the contrary. Without taking into considerations the objective facts
pertaining to the issue at hand, the glue that binds society together is
defective. “Thegreatresetter” thinks (or maybe consciously deceives us)
that he is selling us quality glue, but that glue is in fact spoiled. Why is it

123
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

spoiled? Because there are contrarian components in it, which are

unquestionably true but “thegreatresetter” is not addressing them. He is
not addressing the fact that there are countries with no anomalies in
their total death from all causes vs. time curves, the pattern-evidence;
that is, which suggests no prerequisite for “thegreatresetter’s” doomsday
scenario. Most noteworthy is his not addressing the super-
concentration of financial power in a few concrete super-wealthy
individuals, who were not asked or appointed by anyone to even express
opinions, let alone lead the world. “Thegreatresetter” fails to address the
crucial point concerning the super-concentration of capital into the
hands of only a few individuals, comprising the super-wealthy elite,
making it capable of swaying the entire global politics in any suitable
direction (and pay advocates to write favorable books for any turn of
events they envisage). Why, then, have elections at all, when we already
have rulers in place? This question does not even cross the mind of
“thegreatresetter”. Why should it? Does the servant judge his master?
The truth of the matter is that what the present “democratic”
process really is, in fact, comprises battles within the super-wealthy elite,
completely dismissive to democracy. One group of super-wealthy
battling another one. In this, we are only as a background, as extras, a
voiceless multitude which gives legitimacy with its manipulated vote, to
the cronies of that despicable minority of super-wealthy and to their
win during the bickering of the one faction over the other. Therefore,
when voting, you and I are willingly accepting the role of enablers and
co-conspirators in this very dirty, corrupt political game played by the
elites, to enslave the world under the mimicry of democracy.
“Thegreatresetter” presents matters in such a way as if he asks
us to believe him that world matters are the way he presents them.
How can we believe him, since we ourselves see with our own eyes
elements which unequivocally speak otherwise, different from what he
preaches?
Aside from the dramatic, catastrophic crash of relativity under
the weight of the unequivocal proof shown in the Addendum, which
goes against the lies by the employers of “thegreatresetter” that relativity
is the ultimate scientific theory, creation of a genius, the absolute facts

124
  Totalitarian Government 

seen in the pattern-evidence are also akin to the “Emperor has no

clothes”. These pattern-evidence facts indicate that the origin of the
2020 crisis from purported cov-pandemic is not as clear-cut as
“thegreatresetter” presents it. Notably, however, from the point of view
of the “great reset” propagandist, that reality of the cov-
pandemic→cov-crisis connection, is absolutely necessary not to be
questioned, because in absence of such a connection the existence of a
2020 crisis may be ascribed to clearly unwanted ulterior motives under a
false pretext. The idea of the unblemished cov-pandemic→cov-crisis
connection, however, suits “thegreatresetter” so well that he doesn’t
want to see any counterargument, no matter how objective and in-your-
face—the murkiness of clear defining of the difference between notions
such as “epidemic” and “pandemic” additionally helping in that
reluctance.
THE WISHY-WASHY DISTINCTION BETWEEN
“EPIDEMIC” AND “PANDEMIC”—The distinction between
“epidemic” and “pandemic” is so murky that anyone who gets into the
quagmire of bickering on this topic, especially regarding the alleged cov-
pandemic, risks failure because these matters are pure propaganda and
are decided by the billions of dollars invested to promote the idea of
cov-pandemic, without regard for whether it is real or not. Try to argue
it on the basis of whether it has the character of a pandemic and you will
get nowhere.
RELATIVITY IS AT THE TOP OF THE DEBUNKABILITY
IN HIERARCHY OF THE MANIPULATIONS—The use of
“pandemic” is one of these rhetoric devices in 2020, which comes in
handy for any big manipulator of society. One may compare this with
selling energy or even better, selling a “pet rock”. In the latter case,
selling energy or a pet rock, the result is extraction of money, while in
the former case, the supposed cov-pandemic, the goal is global control.
Massive manipulation comprises also the use of absurd science,
presenting it as the science of a genius, and this deserves even more
attention. The need for even more attention towards the
mountebanking of absurd relativity is due to the fact that these bad-
science manipulators, selling the snake-oil of relativity, can be caught

125
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

red-handed, like no one else could be. Try to catch red-handed the
pandemics manipulators and see how far you will go. Thus, we just
discussed a way, by using pattern-evidence, but as far as the final blow is
concerned, the pattern-evidence is inferior to pinpointing the pseudo-
science manipulators gathered around a pathological topic such as
relativity and progeny, who, on top of it, are deceiving the world about
matters (such as relativity and progeny) of much greater importance for
the world than any other thinkable topic of global significance.
Pandemics come and go, social orders change, sometimes drastically.
However, the science shysters, feeding off of absurdities such as relativity,
are alive and well, enjoying their loot throughout the most stormy waters
of history, staying always on top for over a century.
This time, however, they have nowhere to go. The catastrophic
argument shown in the Addendum, unequivocally bringing down
relativity, is so powerful that no money and no power or authority can
undermine it. Only suppressing it through ignoring may arrest it from
being heard. The argument itself, however, stays, as powerful as ever and
that arrest cannot last forever.
It is very important not to lose the golden opportunity and
remove the pivotal menace, relativity, destroying out of sight the
thinking of the world, and instead be tricked to get into the trap of
discussing murky issues, which can never be decided unequivocally. Your
loss, if you allow yourself to be distracted by secondary issues, is
forewarned.
Yet, even the pattern-evidence argument, although not as
powerful and categorical, as the one debunking the absurd character
of the leading mainstream absurdity, relativity, foisted during the
twentieth century and packed to appear as science, can still give partial
categorical answers regarding the pandemic.
Thus, it may seem unfathomable how humanity could fall for
the manipulative presentation of numbers about a viral disease, numbers
which no member of the public can at all verify directly, while at the
same time ignore the in-your-face absolute data for the deaths from all
causes? However, the fact that an absolutely unequivocal proof
concerning the absurdity of relativity can be completely ignored by the

126
  Totalitarian Government 

world, the fact that the most important global prop, promoted as the
intellectual pillar of humanity, turns out to be a joke, eroded inside and
out by the worms of lunacy, that it turns out to be a science buffoonery,
takes down all hope that one can ever rely on any rational streak of
society. Any trial to imbue sense in this still body, completely deprived
of any sense, is a waste of time. Therefore, writing about these matters,
as in this book, is only to have them registered on “paper”, figuratively
speaking, without any hope that they will reach anyone whatsoever, let
alone make a dent in anyone’s mind.
Instead, there is a similar difficulty concerning the purported
cov-pandemic. The propaganda machine is bombarding the world with
phony numbers of “confirmed cases”, which, when it comes to the
really important final number, the number of deaths from all causes, fail
to live up to what is claimed. In many cases, the reported numbers
pertaining to cov-pandemic are in direct conflict with the absolute
numbers of deaths from all causes, numbers provided by the most
reliable source, governmental agencies of the sort of CDC (the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention).
Incidentally, pockets of anomalies; at that, showing
different structure, while the rest of the countries exhibiting no
anomalies at all, is not a categorical sign of a pandemic.
Definitions of the term pandemic may be shifting every now and
then. One may even be reluctant to use the term pandemic because
of that unstable definition, but the mosaic of the pattern-evidence, even
exhibiting loose clusters of peculiar character, discernibly different
from each other, is beyond doubt (cf. Fig.1). This requires a
special investigation and analysis which will be deferred to future
studies, for now satisfying ourselves by just qualitative observation of
this disturbing discrepancy between reported questionable numbers
referring to the concrete alleged agent responsible for the possible cov-
pandemic, on the one hand, and on the other, the official number of
deaths from all causes.
In order not to lose focus, it must be reminded that all that talk
about the reality of cov-pandemic, has a direct connection to the
ultimate goal of the super-wealthy elite—the use of government as their
totalitarian tool to guarantee said elite’s eternal privilege and control

127
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

over the world. Clues about this connection were already given and
there will be more as we go along further in the text of this book. Thus,
some discussion follows on social programs and big government as an
element of the “great reset”.
EMPHASIS ON SOCIAL PROGRAMS AS JUSTIFICATION
FOR BIG GOVERNMENT AND ITS INTERVENTION—Citing
anecdotal evidence about what social policies are implemented in some
countries today, with the aim for these examples to serve as a
justification for the government-centralized “great reset”, are neglecting
the fact that social programs have a long history, which, at the dawn
of the modern world, was begun by none other than Otto von
Bismarck. So, these programs, even their improvement, have no
connection with the cov-crisis and its aftermath as a generator of
centralized social governance. The reasons for the emergence of
the ideas of “new normal” of the “great reset”, are elsewhere and
they are discussed in other parts of this book. This emergence
always has its roots in the elite’s need for self-preservation and final
establishment of its control over society, of course, always trying to
smooth the sharp edges causing societal friction and eventual turmoil.
Neither are the details of environmentally-friendly policies a
way to distract us from asking what the main reason for the “great reset”
is. The latter has no other goal but to serve the interests of that very
narrow super-monied elite, under the hypocritical pretense of concern
for the environment and care for the poor. The main effort, since long
before Otto von Bismarck to this day, is for the elites to hold in check
the slaves and the poor, mainly in terms of avoiding trouble, as well as to
maintain the integrity of the workforce.
Of course, “thegreatresetter” is obsessed with the question
concerning in what direction will the inevitable change of social norms
go. Ironically that we should say that, he need not worry, however. The
political prerequisites and framework toward collectivism and
administrative destruction of capitalism, replacing it with limping
capitalism, are already in place. This is the direction in which the West
will move in the foreseeable future and this direction has roots planted
and tended throughout the course of decades. This destructive path

128
  Totalitarian Government 

really sounds like a plan designed by lunatics. However, knowing what

directly provable lunacy relativity is, and how enthusiastically it is being
advanced globally by this same elite, the act of advancing another
auxiliary lunacy, such as the “great reset”, should not surprise us.
GOVERNMENT KNOWS MORE ABOUT YOUR HEALTH
THAN YOU DO—Further, going down the list of themes of concern to
“thegreatresetter”, we get to the healthcare. Accessible healthcare,
advocated by “thegreatresetter”, may be a commendable goal, but
ensuring accessible healthcare by turning it into industry, moreover
accompanied by destroying the basis of capitalism, its market, through
governmental extraction of the needed money from companies and
private persons to upkeep that industry, will not only not improve
matters, but is a recipe for a future quagmire. Especially, if the idea is to
preserve capitalism and build on it social impediments which suffocate
it. If you don’t like capitalism, don’t destroy it by letting it go on by
burdening it with more and more weights. Instead, offer a new,
working and fairer model for society. Alas, there are no proposals in
this respect in the writings of “thegreatresetter”, although there are,
indeed, unmentioned by “thegreatresetter”, existing ideas such as the
non-industry-laden Semashko system of public healthcare, similar to
what Great Britain, Germany, Sweden or Japan have. Instead, solving
the sharp contradictions in capitalism is relegated by “thegreatresetter”
to its crude ravaging and destruction, because it is easier that way—the
want of new ideas is substituted by half-baked ideas of mindless
destruction.
By the way, on what basis is it assumed that everyone would be
comfortable with the government knowing more about one’s state of
health than the citizen himself knows about his own health? Once e-
tracing and e-tracking is instituted as a lawful tool, detecting and
keeping by the government of many life-parameters in special database
centers, is one step away. The social consciousness of the citizens,
limiting themselves in the name of others, is the personal business of the
citizens. Centralized control over citizens for the good of society, as the
centralized authorities understand it, has been tried more than once,
and the end result always leads to concentration camps. Society does

129
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

not consist of imbeciles who always ignore clearly spelled out

arguments. Well, the government is clearly deficient in such arguments
because of the complexity of the matter, even if we exclude deliberate
manipulation of pushing a make-believe pandemic. This lack of
arguments is no reason for the government to resort to crude, medieval
methods and see what happens; that is, an activity under the motto
“better violate every human right and freedom, than risk mass
infection”. A similar argument, waving the common good in its
support, has been waved by every tyrannical government, and it is
especially efficient when it concerns health and the population is made
scared to death by imminent death prospects.
OFFSETTING OVERCONSUMPTION BY GREATER
GOVERNMENT—Speaking again about offsetting
overconsumption, but now, in the context of justifying big government
striving to fight overconsumption, we ought to note that material
consumption cannot be offset by mere coercive imposition of a robust
social fabric.

• respect for the environment

• responsible eating

• empathy

• generosity

will remain only wishful thinking in the dog-eat-dog world of

capitalism, if these social norms are coerced administratively, as is the
intention in the “great reset”. These social norms will flourish only if
they grow naturally from the common body of society, and society itself
begins to feel the need to have them as the mortar to hold together its
bricks, without the watchful eye of the Big Brother.
In thinking about the difficulty of finding such working
solution, one cannot refrain from first noting that it is true that modern
capitalism has mastered, even better than its predecessor, the dodging

130
  Totalitarian Government 

aimed at disguising what ultimately it has always been—requiring the

populace to “own nothing and be happy”. “Own nothing and be
happy”, but “you and I”, not the microscopic in number “us”, who are
the super-wealthy owning-everything elite. Capitalism, call it modern,
call it traditional, spins it, twists it, but in the end, again and again, lands
on confiscation of property from the majority in favor of minority.
Today, appearing to act in its most insurmountable form, through
applied eugenics (faux-cov-pandemic) as the inducer of the “great
reset”, the super-wealthy-favoring-capitalism hopes to achieve its final
victory, without the finagling of Thatcherism with its pretend-
universality of ownership, ownership of crumbs, really, when it comes
to the multitude. The “great reset” quite frankly states its goals of all-
ownership-control by the central authority, setting society in directions
advantageous to these central authorities, through the levers which this
central ownership places in the hands of a select few—the uber-monied
elite.
CAPITAL REDISTRIBUTION—JUSTIFICATION
FOR TOTAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL—“Thegreatresetter”
talks of wealth redistribution amongst the non-elite multitude in the
post cov-pandemic period, from the rich to the poor and from capital to
labor. However, he still holds off revealing what exactly the mechanism
for that redistribution will be. We already know the administrative
character of the proposal and we already know that the socio-political
conditions for a collectivist control have been built for decades and are
now in place, independent of whether or not the cov-crisis had been
dreamt of. However, we keep ruminating, while waiting to hear
“thegreatresetter’s”solution, administrative control, imposed in a
totalitarian fashion on society has always failed. It is doomed to fail in
its latest “great reset” rendition as well. So it seems, before we hear the
bright idea “thegreatresetter” might have to save the day. Unless a
method is discovered, following from the intrinsic tendencies of society
itself, by which society would grow organically, not through
oligarchical totalitarian imposition of a “great reset”, ensuring a
thousand years rule by a super-wealthy elite over some new kind of
Fourth Reich. Unless society finds, in its own potentials, a really

131
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

sustainable, fairer way of development, any outside social engineering

aimed at favoring one tiny group at the expense of the larger society, is a
failure foretold. We still, however, don’t know what “thegreatresetter”
has in mind. Eventually, we would be able to discern, digging amongst
the barrage of words and sentences. As a heads up—don’t raise your
hopes or hold your breath. The solution proposed will be even scarier in
its expectation for suppression, albeit really innovative, up to the new
realities—thanks but no thanks. Before getting to that, we need to dig
through some topics, which may help us understand the main take.
MAINTENANCE OF DISPARITY—In its traditional way,
the system functions towards maintaining the concentration of wealth
in one private hand, but then, to give the appearance of maintaining
equality, that same system confiscates, in effect steals, through taxes,
from that same person. Of course, mere taxation will not eradicate the
root of the problem, which consists of the compounded conditions
allowing concentration of wealth in the hands, not only of social
groups, but in the hands of even very few concrete individuals. Fiscal
policies such as taxation are only a token solicitude of the state towards
the less fortunate and the most basic upkeep of infrastructure and social
services. Therefore, “thegreatresetter” thinks he has come up with a
principally new, non-traditional system, a system which will push
coercively those that are known to be pure profit-makers into sharing
their profits with the community, the “stakeholders”, by, in fact,
turning those companies into debtors to the government. This, in my
book, sounds like nationalization. At that, the government, like a good
parent, stimulating the good behavior of a child, will reward the
company for its good social behavior and abiding by the “green”, and
will punish it if it does not comply. All that central regulation will be
accomplished by controlling the non-private digital money-flow,
stimulus funds and what have you, with the already talked about
“covenant” attached to it. For this reason, middle and small businesses
have to be almost ruined, in order to be forced to go to the government
for these “covenant”-burdened loans—a complete vicious cycle with
the legitimate business at the center. The population, those who do not
belong to the elite, will be held in check by algorithms—dumb but very

132
  Totalitarian Government 

laborious helpers—dispassionately determining social ranking based on

unbridled putting aside of personal privacy, including through
removing the privacy element in the currencies, replacing it with
traceable digital money. Of course, this control will also make divisions
along political lines, religious, ethnic, national, perception for biological
differences, moot, because the government (read: the elites) holds all the
instruments with which it will direct society towards greater
homogeneity, which is the state of society advantageous for these
elites—it is easier to govern homogeneous society of low
intelligence, designated to function only as a work horse, especially as a
multitude in a de-industrialized, service economy. Such homogeneous
society will be more productive, now converted from sharply
competitive into a cooperative, agreeable society. This is, of course,
an unrealizable world state of affairs, which many major global
players are not going to go along with.
These matters are explained more thoroughly in other parts of
this book. Here, this detour is made to note the more deep and
elaborate character of the new administration of the “great reset”
imagined by the elites, compared to the real, fractured and multifaceted
free world and its instruments of governance.
The real outcome of this kind of discussion, however, is
realizing once again that no matter what somersaults and twisting and
turning is undertaken, the road to addressing and solving the problems
of humanity is the restoration of un-corrupted real science and the
recognition that truth exists, while restituting its real meaning. Search
for the truth as the basis, is where the analysis for the real improvement
of the world must begin, if the real intentions are not instituting of
world changes serving the interests of a small elite group only, which
imagines that it can fool the world by imposing on it, to its own ends,
unnatural governance-design through perfidious instruments
of control.
It is very curious what “thegreatresetter” says about the so-
called “neoliberalism”, which espouses

133
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

• competition

• creative destruction

and

• economic growth

as opposed to

• solidarity

• government intervention

and

• social welfare

He claims that the neoliberal “market fetishism”, being in decline, now

finally will be dead due to the cov-crisis. This thesis, however, does not
stand scrutiny for several reasons, probably the main reason being the
already mentioned fact that a substantial part of the world will not go
along with the “great reset” plan of the Davos elite to control the world,
the only outcome being the West’s suffering, if the “great reset” is ever
implemented.
However, even if we suppose, for the sake of argument, that the
whole world decides to adopt the suppression of the “great reset”, even
then the unnatural, twisted capitalism, will collapse on itself, as
discussed elsewhere in this book.
Of course, the hope of “thegreatresetters” is that by making the
entire world adopt the cov-pandemic mantra, as the cause for global cov-
crisis, that would automatically convince the entire world of the need
for a “great reset”, thus ending the current ubiquitous neoliberalism,
which has expanded to such an extent that has already become harmful
for these elites by creating unbearable inequalities, exhausting of

134
  Totalitarian Government 

resources and general unfairness. However, these are plans which “don’t
reckon with the host” because, aside from the suspicious cov-
pandemic→cov-crisis connection, which, judging from the pattern-
evidence shown in this book, appears artificially created by political
design, rather than naturally occurring, the cov-crisis→“great reset”
connection hasn’t been proven by “thegreatresetter”.
And again, even if we accept, for the sake of discussion, that
the cov-crisis→“great reset” connection has been proved, that applies
only to the West. As a matter of fact, one may recall that this author
admitted, but for reasons differing from those implied by
“thegreatresetter”, that the West has already been undermined
throughout decades of decimating the reality of truth along the veins of
academia, and has become ripe for a final blow—a destruction of the
sort of the “great reset” is waiting around the corner. This kind of
destruction, however, also only awaits the West. As said, important
world players are very far from that kind of self-destructive
conditioning of the West. These other players have their own problems,
they may also be destructive, but it is taking place in their own way. It is
quite paradoxical, indeed, that the neoliberalism which the West,
mainly the USA, installed in virgin countries, which were developing
based on different principles, now grew and developed to such an
extent in these formerly virgin countries, that these countries
emancipated themselves and became major competitors of the West in
their role of the staunchest protectors of the neoliberal model.
COV-PANIC IS NOT A STORY OF FAILED GLOBAL
GOVERNANCE—The cov-panic cannot be a story of failed world
governance, in a sense that thus far the world was governed badly, but
now that it has fallen into a cov-crisis, a good governance has suddenly
emerged, which will save the world through a “great reset”, which a
super-wealthy elite has figured out as a panacea. There is no firm
evidence, however, that the cov-panic was not artificially created exactly
for the purposes of creating the impression that the world needs a
savior, embodied by an otherwise mediocre, but super-wealthy elite.
Thus, the impression is created by the elite privately owning most of the
global media, that the world is in need of even tighter central

135
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

governance in in the form of a perfectioned totalitarian control.

Rather, there are clues to the contrary; namely, that it is a story,
none other than a story of deliberate world manipulation. Any
infectious disease, which the world has never gotten rid of and is still
around in one form or another, could have been turned into a story of
manipulation, at least in not too few of the countries of the world, had
it been promoted as a main item on the news.
The world governments, seen as separate entities in
cooperation with each other, rather than one compound entity
governed by one center, can be accused of many things, but not of
failure to properly deal with a newspaper-born crisis. Global media,
however, overshadows these local powers and gives them no chance to
breathe the air of freedom and to cope with their own problems on
their own terms.
SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL COUP D’ÉTAT
—The problems between superpowers are of a completely different
nature than the problems between small and dependent countries. The
latter follow the lead of the superpowers, depending on whose side the
smaller countries are. It was observed how the central government of
one of the superpowers, a brainchild of another superpower, efficiently
extinguished the attempt to use the pretext of a made-up health threat
for staging a coup d’état, while the central government of the other
superpower could not prevent the takeover under the same false
pretext. Therefore, the roots of knowing what happened must be
sought in establishing the reality of what occurred after March 2020,
not the consequences seen in the Fall of 2020, which are only a function
of what took place in March. The reality of what happened in March,
however, is a very difficult problem to establish with full certainty,
especially when the global mass-media is controlled by one of the
competing parties. This is the gist and the meanness of the whole ploy,
and the only absolute clues, albeit insufficient to form a definitive
conclusion, are provided by the pattern-evidence data. It is in such
cases, when the absoluteness and finality of the unequivocal proof, such
as the unequivocal proof presented in the Addendum, entirely bringing
down a major global problem such as relativity, can be really
appreciated.

136
  Totalitarian Government 

Thus, not being categorically evident that the cov-crisis came about due
to a pandemic—in the presence of elements comprising absolute truths,
countering the thesis of pandemic—there is no basis to invent
internationalization of that crisis on paper. Travel in the United States
between the 41 states without medical anomaly and the 12 states
showing anomaly did not cease during the months characterized by the
alleged epidemic, yet, as seen (Fig.4) the curves in these 41 states of the
total number of deaths from all causes plotted against time, are flat,
showing in an indisputable way, no medical anomaly in these 41 US
states. The same applies to countries of Central and Eastern Europe and
the Scandinavian countries, the anomalies being observed, save in
Greece, in all countries on the periphery of Europe, and part of Great
Britain. On the other hand, massive anomalies showing a different kind
of pattern in the curves, compared to the anomalous run in part of
Europe, as well as in one fifth of the states in the USA, are seen in some
South American countries. These peculiarities are so obvious that they
are observed by even a cursory glance at the graphs in question (cf.
Fig.1). A more thorough study may be warranted when all the
maximums and all the anomalies have subsided in all countries.
Therefore, what is said here should be perceived at least as only a
warning sign not to take what was promoted through the mass-media as
some entirely unsullied “white whale” that was dumped on humanity to
disturb it so fatally as to foretell a total change of ways via a “great reset”.
“THEGREATRESETTER” SPITS THE PEBBLE—The
phrase “spit the pebble” means nothing in English, but in other
languages it means “to finally say what you have kept silent”. I thought
that phrase might bring some international flair to a really international
concern. When reading texts or listening to speeches of “greatresetters”,
there comes a moment when we can do nothing but exclaim—Ah, now
we see what “thegreatresetter” is all about. Finally “thegreatresetter”
spills the beans: “global governance”, this is the stone in his shoe, that
was putting a chip on his shoulder, but was the very thing he was afraid
to spell out until mid-book or mid-speech. Mind you, “global
governance” is the eternal desire of the select few, which our author,

137
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

“thegreatresetter”, now tries to fit into the box of a purported

pandemic. I see. This is why a vehicle such as pandemic, a cov-pandemic
in this case to add more uncertainty and urgency, was so necessary to
emerge, and if there isn’t one, it was going to be invented, as it is
invented now.
PLANTING THE IDEA OF WORLD GOVERNANCE
—Furthermore, there are two points that are being desperately pushed
by “thegreatresetter”; namely, that the situation is highly volatile and
fast moving, and modern life is of an interconnected nature, which
excludes individualist façade. This is how, brick by brick, the main
agenda for world governance over a homogeneous mass of a faceless
multitude of low intelligence, not even able to stand for its own
individuality, is planted in the mind of the population.
However, both of these are not supported by the actual state of
matters. The latter, the argument about the individualist façade of
otherwise collectivist, interconnected nature of everyone of us, is
eliminated at once. In order for this interconnectedness to be realized,
every citizen must have a dedicated device which will ensure such
interconnectedness. However, the device is not an intrinsic part of the
citizen’s organism, at least for the time being, and he may choose not to
own one. The minute a citizen severs his internet ties, he becomes
liberated from this interconnectedness and governmental control. The
day is not seen on the horizon when the government will coercively
distribute free devices costing hundreds of dollars—ubiquitous
surveillance with devices attached to you may be easy and the ways to
do it may be available, but they come at a price. They will be
compulsory for the citizen to wear, in order to be tracked and traced by
the government, private companies peeping into private lives
notwithstanding. The boschesque picture of everyone lined up and
marching in step to buy such a device with one’s own money, also
seeming too bizarre. Thus, it is not clear how the scarecrow which the
scaremonger waves, threatening the individuals refusing, for example, to
download the toxic app, would adversely affect everyone else. To say
nothing about the subtle propaganda that citizens must trust their
government (more on this topic in “CLASSIFICATION OF THE

138
  Totalitarian Government 

TRITE” and “NIGHTMARE SCENARIO CENTERED AROUND

A LOWLY APP”).
MORE ON SUPPRESSION BY “FOLLOWING THE
SCIENCE”—As a matter of fact, that instilling in the citizens of the
guilt that “if you are not wearing your mask you are threatening me”, is
another very nastily creative component in the age-old arsenal of
methods for suppression of the individual, especially when no absolute
proof can be produced, but relies only on common sense and hearsay.
And, mind you, that is in the age of the purported freeing of the
individual with all his suspected and unsuspected, mostly biological,
traits, reaching heights of shamelessness unthinkable even a decade or so
ago. There is no unequivocal evidence, which the citizen may ascertain
himself, regarding the need for healthy people to wear masks.
Of course, it stands to reason to think that wearing masks is the
age-old way of preventing outgoing aerosols to get into the surrounding
atmosphere. However, common sense does not count as scientific
proof, especially proof which anyone can confirm reproducibly and
under controlled conditions, in order for such an experiment to count
as genuine scientific proof. Even the medical experts have not reached
consensus on the matter of face-masks. Consensus is the least, as
wanting it is in terms of science, of what one would like to hear from
experts, doing what they can about such a complex matter—it is
mentioned also elsewhere in this book that the more a conclusion
depends on consensus, the least scientific that conclusion is. In certain
matters, however, nothing more than a consensus can be relied upon,
and labeling that consensus as a “scientific conclusion” is misleading the
population, to say the least. So much about respecting science—some
matters are just inherently inept to be called science. The population
must be informed about this and anyone using “science” as a whip to
chastise the disobedient must be ashamed of himself.
Furthermore, how can anyone trust a government which is
pulling the wool over people’s eyes regarding questions about which
even the pronounced specialists cannot reach the least expected from
them—consensus, as non-scientific as it is?
Conversely, that relativity is unequivocally absurd can

139
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

be ascertained personally by practically every average citizen of

sound mind and you hear no one shaming the government for
allowing that shameful situation and disgrace. Furthermore, that
the unequivocal pattern-evidence leads to the undeniable
consequence abolishing the monolithic character of the conclusion
labeled by the murky term “pandemic”, is unsustained, cannot be
questioned—this absolutely unquestionable, final criterion for
whether there had been a health anomaly in a country, proves that
not only are there groups of countries exhibiting clearly different
patterns, but also that there are groups of countries where there are
no health anomalies observed at all.
More importantly, the question cannot be asked frequently
enough; namely, how can anyone, then, trust the government, since it is
demonstrably unwilling to intervene in the absolutely clear-cut case—
the absurdity of relativity and progeny—and stop squandering the
billions and billions of taxpayer dollars? Removing relativity
and progeny from science by cancelling its funding, is the most
important question of humanity, incomparably more important than
addressing the problems of pandemics or the causes for climate change.
As a matter of fact, these latter problems and all other problems of
society, can never be solved satisfactorily, least of all, in the current
conditions of shattered science, with science’s most fundamental
notions time, space and motion, destroyed by the insidiously
entrenched absurd relativity.

140
ELEMENTS OF THE “GREAT RESET”

 Anti-Capitalist Sentiment Underlies the “Great Reset” of Capitalism 

As one keeps reading the text of “thegreatresetter”, it becomes ever so

clear that all that, coming under the abstruse term “great reset”,
amounts to how a bunch of turbo-capitalists, the super-wealthy elite, is
striving to preserve capitalism through anti-capitalism—a contradiction
in terms. If it is anti-capitalism, then there must be an idea regarding
what the capitalist system will be replaced with. What the “great reset”
offers as replacement, is again capitalism, but under totalitarian control
by the super-wealthy elite, in order to ensure that said elite’s governance,
profits and privilege, will not be threatened and disturbed in any way by
the commoners, occasionally rising up for one reason or another.
Rather, these privileges and unquestioned governance would be
cemented forever, dooming the non-elite majority to eternal obedience.
Thus, the “great reset” is not about improving society. It only serves the
egoistic ends of the elite by elaborately feinting the multitude that the
“great reset” serves it, trying in this way to round the sharp corners of
capitalism, feigningly decorating it with a more “human” face. Under
the expected new digital fascism, to be talked about more later, the elite
reckons that the modified form of capitalism would find inevitable
universal, unobstructed acceptance. As any demagoguery, the “great
reset” is glazed by the icing of good intentions, but these good intentions
are only in the hands of the self-proclaimed messiahs belonging to the
upper crust of the wealth-determined elite, who takes for granted that it
is the only one who knows what is good for everyone else. These self-
proclaimed messiahs, members of that super-wealthy elite, use the cov-
pandemic scare, trying to solve their own political and economic
problems, which they themselves have created, and are ultimately
avalanching on themselves. This urgency, even panic, demonstratively
resorting to all kind of ways to skew the normal process of elections,

141
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

expected to be democratic, by getting the whole world into a make-

believe cov-pandemic state and, once the election atmosphere is
poisoned, outrightly rig it, comes out of the atavistic fear of the uber-
wealthy elite, caused by the rage of the masses. This elite is constantly
on a lookout for ways to control and direct such rage in the desired
fashion, accommodating its dictatorial goals.
After the unsuccessful attempts at control by the old-fashioned
totalitarianisms, then causing the overthrow of these totalitarianisms,
eventually reaching the state of having the world in a dangerously (to
the taste of the elite) free state, various ways of suppressing and
distracting of potential mass troubles were invented and tried by this
same elite. This is how the world saw

• the introduction of the drug and opioid crisis, which began in the
nineteen sixties

• rampant unbridled entertainment, including entertainment in

some most debasing directions

• the internet really enhancing that tendency

However, all these methods were chaotic and quite uselessly

deactivating the population. Something else was needed, which would
both take care of dissent and would channel society into a productive
direction, advantageous to the elite. A new efficient kind of
totalitarianism was needed.
This need, existing on the agenda of the elite at all times, for
protective control over society, had already ripened with the advent of
the communications age, and today, it is in a position to ensure the
perfect enslavement and an ultimate control of this elite over society.
The elite could not wait to invent an impetus in the form of cov-crisis,
to set it in motion. Furthermore, there is no wonder why the elite so
much pushes the digital economy, but not in its variant preserving
privacy through, say, blockchains. That sort of blockchain-less digital
economy is the prefect tool for such an enslavement. Such a way of

142
  Anti-Capitalist Capitalism 

ubiquitous control, ensured by centralized unencrypted flow of data,

firmly associated with each concrete individual person, falls right into
their (the monied-elite) totalitarian hands of ultimate intrinsic
dictatorship.
The easily installable means for mass control, which the
blockchain-less digital economy allows, efficiently curbs any dissident
activities and encourages activities which are in compliance with what
the elite wants. It is amazing how even trivial developments, such as the
digital ways of data interchange, when multiplied to penetrate
everywhere, can dialectically lead to consequences which defy the initial
appearance of the digital approach as a tool of freedom.
Thus, paradoxically, those who benefit the most from
capitalism, now redress as a wolf in sheep’s clothing, as faux-anti-
capitalists, only to preserve their reign more efficiently and conclusively.
FURTHER REPERCUSSIONS—ANTI-CAPITALIST
SENTIMENTS WITHIN CAPITALISM—What was said above
has grave political implications, if implemented.
Firstly, we learn that over the past 10 years what used to be
capitalism in its own sense; that is, a system whose very heart is the free
market, has shed that main characteristic, succumbing to the whims of
the day, adopted as political will of the moment. Now, although the
understanding as to whether this is really so requires a wider analysis,
which we will not attempt here, the focus being on some telltale “great
reset”, induced specifically by an alleged cov-crisis, it is, nevertheless,
curious to observe the tendencies mentioned by “thegreatresetter”,
which conspicuously hint that something like a cov-crisis was intended
to happen as part of the design of those who shaped the world politics
in the past decade.
Now, instead of the market being the regulator, as has been
since the times of Adam Smith, very curious external interventions are
coerced by “thegreatresetter” on the functioning of business. It appears
that, instead of fighting capitalism head-on, as it took place during past
times, when the old-fashioned and very unsuccessful class struggle was
implemented for the purpose, said modern revision acquired much
subtler expressions, one of the first swallows of that new, more

143
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

elaborate trend, being Antonio Gramsci. Of course, today he will be

turning in his grave if he saw what further came out of these subtler
expressions, but, nevertheless, he appears to be the father, wittingly or
unwittingly, to what followed after, through, say, the Frankfurt School
and on. The question still persists, though, how much figures, such as
Gramsci, were and are, just pawns of those microscopic in number over-
wealthy few, who shape the direction of the world and in whose vital
interest is the continuous mitigation of the sharp edges of the ever
evolving global capitalism. Although it stands to reason that such
scenario of shaping the world affairs seems plausible, instead of further
speculating on the matter, characterized by an intrinsic poverty of hard
facts, we will keep analyzing what is in front of us.
“Thegreatresetter” takes the cov-crisis as something which has
come upon the world unassociated with what was happening earlier in
the world politics. The implication is that these were just opportune
times for something unassociated but very special, that has fortuitously
arrived to trigger the inevitability of a revolution labeled as the “great
reset”, advanced by cov-crisis. Would such revolution have occurred
without that trigger, “thegreatresetter” doesn’t venture to speculate, the
way he neglects the obvious signs of the pattern-evidence, poking holes
in the cov-pandemic integrity itself. “Thegreatresetter”, as said, takes the
cov-pandemic for granted, impeccably real and of demonic effect on the
world. This is “thegreatresetter’s” firm premise throughout his text and
that cannot be otherwise, should his thesis regarding the “great reset”
have any viability. Even a crack in the cov-pandemic monolith would
make his thesis shaky. Alas, the pattern-evidence demonstrates such
crack.
Interestingly, although “thegreatresetter” considers the cov-
pandemic a happenstance, its monolithic truthfulness notwithstanding,
it happened to fit quite snugly into the very curious modifications of
the anti-capitalist sentiments of the last decade. “Thegreatresetter” fully
admits that, although being completely oblivious to the fact of what
an admission such as this may trigger, in addition to the pattern-
evidence. This admission may lead to thoughts, which may not go in
the direction “thegreatresetter” would want them to go.

144
  Anti-Capitalist Capitalism 

Anyway, what is interesting about this last-decade-modification

of the anti-capitalist ideology and the “great reset” symbiosis, is how this
so-called “great reset” serves the said sentiments.
First thing to notice in this respect is the à priori conviction of
“thegreatresetter” that it is already commonly accepted that companies’
fundamental purpose is not the unbridled pursuit of financial profits.
In other words, “thegreatresetter” believes à priori, or pulls our leg that
he does, that capitalism has already been irreparably tarnished. Now it
needs only a slight push and we will see it gone altogether.
“Thegreatresetter” conceives the cov-crisis to be this little push and ...
Voila! Thinking about that, it seems extremely unlikely that
“thegreatresetter” in question, putting on paper his flimsy theses, is the
initiator of this raggedy sown idea. Even if this idea were well-tailored, it
is extremely unlikely that he would have the clout to impose it on the
world. Someone with sixty billion dollars in his pocket could, but not
someone who has never been known to come out of wealth.
“Thegreatresetter” has serviced wealth very well, but he himself is not
likely to be anywhere near such status. Hence, a provisional hypothesis
is, that he is just the speaker for someone, for a group, that has that kind
of money and owns mass-media outlets capable of changing the world
overnight. Why would such a group of people, which includes the
future British monarch and the Roman pontiff, have such interest, is
something that would set us in another circle of speculations, which,
although interesting as a topic, I will defer to a future book.
Now that in the past decades, the political climate is forcefully
made such that the survival of the companies in the West is more and
more deflected from what the market requires them to do, is more than
evident. Obviously, some very elaborate anti-capitalist revolution has
already partially taken place and whoever “thegreatresetter” is serving,
has figured out that now is the time, the year 2020, to apply a decisive
push in an equally as unusual way, as all the peculiar movements have
dismantled brick by brick the classical capitalist order of things. In fact,
it was already surmised why specifically 2020 was selected—this was an
election year when an administration highly adversarial to the globalist,
post-modern and post-industrial enslaving goals, was running the

145
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

motor of the western world, trying to bring back the industrial capital
in the stead of having the country, the United States, function
increasingly as a service economy.
Now, “thegreatresetter” tries to convince us that the
destruction of the most fundamental feature of capitalism—the market
—and replacing it with non-market, but substituted by a tight central
control of everyone outside the elite, is good for companies and for, of
all things, capitalism itself. People, however, have written literature in
which a funny society is described where

• bad is good

• war is peace

and

• lie is truth

and now we have someone, a completely grey figure, coming out of the
woodwork, determined to implement such twisted ideology for you
and me, and we cannot do anything about it.
PIGGYBACKING ONTO THE ALREADY FORMED
ANTI-CAPITALIST GOVERNMENT FAVORING
CAPITALISM—However, as one reads on, everything becomes
crystal clear. This now explains why the March 2020 alleged cov-
pandemic, induced coup d’état style, succeeded. The processes of this
paradoxical anti-capitalist movement, servicing the very capitalist uber-
elite, have already gone too deep into the government and into the deep
state, that the tipping point has already been overcome. We have
reached the point of no return. Western civilization is gone, crushed
under the weight of the “anti-capitalist capitalism”.
At this juncture, we are coming to the gist as to why
“thegreatresetter” considers specifically cov-crisis, and not just any usual
crisis, as a turning-point-crisis. Well, the reason is that he is piggybacking
onto the already created paradoxical anti-capitalist (some call it globalist—a
frank slavery practice) sentiment, subtly and subversively implemented
throughout the years at all levels of government.

146
  Anti-Capitalist Capitalism 

In other words, it is not so much that companies burn with

desire to implement the ESG (environmental, social, governance)
dictate of the so-called “stakeholder capitalism”, as “thegreatresetter”
makes us believe, but the hands of the companies are twisted and tied
behind their backs by the governing winds of the day.
This destruction, however, applies to the western world only,
and is in direct contrast with the ideology of China. This is why China
is becoming stronger by the day, while the West is becoming weaker
and weaker.
It must be understood that no societal improvement can be
achieved by planting destructive ideas of capitalism-denial upon the
body of capitalism. If you are honestly concerned about the deficiencies
of capitalism, and not use these deficiencies to subversively entrench the
inherently imperfect capitalism forever in society, as the elite does in
service of its own interests, then, either come up with a way to replace
capitalism by a consistent new order, not pretending to do that by
undermining capitalism but still keeping it limping, or better think
twice before you propose to destroy capitalism’s mechanisms. It is not
written in stone anywhere that capitalism is the ultimate social order,
the drastic discrepancy between rich and poor burning the retina of the
honest person, but taking it down without proper replacement, by
nipping it out chunk by chunk, with the intention to modify it in a
handicapped state, is a destruction from which everyone will suffer,
even though, the 99% more so than the 1%.
“Thegreatresetter” calls this maimed capitalism “stakeholder
capitalism”, as opposed to the genuine “shareholder capitalism”, and
thinks that such an unsustainable (no pun intended; the pun would be
considering that “stakeholder capitalism” is sustainable) creation can
persist as a stable system. It can be felt (although there is no unequivocal
proof on par with the unequivocal proof demonstrating that relativity
is absurd) that such optimism is unjustified. The United States is
divided more than ever today and that division will continue. The
division in question is not even between the 99% and the 1%, but is
splitting the country approximately in half. It is exactly this pseudo-
anti-capitalist political elite, holding the political system in its iron grip,

147
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

that is advancing the 99% vs. 1% gap. This is exactly the reason why one
may speculate that it is in the interest of this 1% to support so much the
pseudo-anti-capitalist grab of the political system and to elevate odious
personalities like “thegreatresetter” as their global bugles.
“ANTI-CAPITALIST CAPITALIST” MOVEMENT
UNDERMINES MARKET THROUGH CAPITALISM ITSELF
—The “anti-capitalist capitalist” movement is undermining the market
by using capitalism’s own devices. Thus, in the old tradition of
capitalism, the market always favors the goods that are in greater
demand. The government, occupied by anti-capitalist political activists,
goaded by the tiny elite, creates niches where there have been none
before, stated even more affirmatively, where no such niches are at all
possible. Rather, the government packages as sellable goods, ideas which
the classical capitalism would never consider as such. Furthermore,
these ideas, clothed as rules, may not be even marketable, but the
companies know better not to violate these imposed rules, thus “earning
profit” through sparing penalties on politically-dictated issues. Make
everyone dependent on government’s unencrypted privacy-eliminating
“free” money, which government has no problem generating by selling
imagined debt to the banks, and turning capitalism into capitalistic
non-capitalism, is like ABC. More on this later.
SLIGHT HOPE THAT WE WILL BE GIVEN
JUSTIFICATION FOR THE DRMATIC NEED FOR THE
“GREAT RESET”—“Thegreatresetter” uses the possibly phony cov-
pandemic to justify, by going syllogistically through cov-crisis→post
cov-crisis→“great reset”, the appearance that there should be
centralized governmental interference in all aspects of our lives as
something inherently natural. However, when he says “governmental”
control, that actually means private control by the billionaires, as
handlers of the governments these billionaires have put in place. The
emphasis is on the economy and business, with many, but, in fact, very
commonplace details given, up to almost any high-schooler to list.
However, the effect goes further than that, engaging every single
individual, outside of the super-wealthy elite circle, in this vile
centralized game. Suffice it to mention again the intended annihilation

148
  Anti-Capitalist Capitalism 

of privacy, discussed in more detail elsewhere in this book.

Although we are told that we have already been given reasons
why the cov-crisis has rewritten not all, but many of the rules of the
game, no less, between public and private sector, this hasn’t happened.
Refresh your memory all your want to recall what these given reasons
were, and all you will find is regurgitation of known effects of crises on
business and life, which by no means explain the specialness of cov-crisis
and what comes after it, compared to other crises and their aftermaths.
Most importantly, none of this explains why there should be some
uber-totalitarian “new normal” established, which should be different
from the “old normal” of the ordinary capitalism. Indeed, it is
postulated that there must be a totalitarian “new normal” but backing
that with arguments is less than flimsy. It is not enough to postulate a
thesis, if the thesis doesn’t make sense, which is especially true when
frivolous postulates are aiming at an external exacerbation of the control
over every person’s life, to the extent that everyone’s destiny will be
entirely in the hands of an elite which has segregated itself only due to
wealth, not for having any other qualities, let alone being asked to
govern peoples’ destinies. One, of course, cannot expect that what was
just said would impress anyone and, as a result, that anyone will go out
and ask the elite for an explanation and hold it responsible, and because
there could possibly be no explanation, would make the elite resign
from its position of power and governance. The rule in the world from
time immemorial, is that “might makes right” and never the other way
round. We can, however, mark this unfairness, at least for the record.
Nevertheless, “thegreatresetter” assumes that we now must
already be comfortable and have accepted and taken for granted that,
forget the period of cov-pandemic and its reality, business will
experience, as an inevitable consequence of specifically this particular
alleged cov-crisis, an unheard-of governmental interference in the post
cov-pandemic period, caused by some so-called “great reset”. Therefore,
we should take it as a given that not after just any crisis, but especially
after this particular cov-crisis, we; that is, no less than the world as a
whole, will gladly experience governmental intervention, if totalitarian
control can pass as just “governmental intervention”.

149
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Now, we are given a list of three consequences of the cov-crisis in the so-
called post cov-crisis period, and we ask ourselves, are these three
consequences natural consequences from any post-crisis or are they
specific only to the post cov-crisis or, further yet, are these
consequences some consequences which “thegreatresetter” postulates
must happen, which otherwise, if he hadn’t postulated them, would not
happen? Hopefully, we will find the answers to these questions as we
read on.
Let us list these consequences, in order to have them handy in
front of our eyes:

1. conditional bailouts

2. public procurement

and

3. labor market regulations

On point 1—We learn that there will be stimulus packages for the
companies. How does “thegreatresetter” know that? Is he an elected
governmental official somewhere or has he overheard it somewhere, or
probably he himself is some sort of a global legislator who will be telling
the governments what to do? It is possible that he has knowledge of
earlier post-crises when governments have instituted stimulus packages.
However, if that is so, then the post cov-crisis is no different from other,
earlier crises, in this respect, a point which we are sure “thegreatresetter”
will resist. Was it not his goal to convince us that the post cov-crisis is
something special, unheard of before, and therefore something
requiring a “great reset” and not just any sort of “restart”? Well, we
cannot get the answer to these questions, given that “thegreatresetter”
did not bother providing us at least with a clue on that matter.
Therefore, for now, we will forego the role of “thegreatresetter” in this

150
  Anti-Capitalist Capitalism 

problem and will move on.

Now, once we have learned, out of the blue, that the
governments will disburse stimulus packages to companies, we find that
to be nice and generous. Here, however, the “too good to be true” rule
kicks in and, lo and behold, the first restriction pops up, which, again, is
not at all clear where “thegreatresetter” has the knowledge about or
whether maybe he is postulating it as something which will inevitably
happen (because “thegreatresetter” says so). The restriction in question
is that the stimulus packages, will be tied up with a “covenant”,
involving three points

1.1. not to fire employees

1.2. not to buy back shares

and

1.3. not to pay executive bonuses

Notice also something very interesting—“thegreatresetter” knows that

these stimulus packages will not be freely distributed to companies but
will be borrowed by the companies. I wonder if I would want, once
beat up by a suspiciously strange cov-crisis, to have my company served
on a platter to the government as a debtor. However, that’s me. There
may be others who masochistically enjoy such plight.
Thus, not only is my company beat up by something which
may or may not be the result of a natural disaster, not only would I then
become indebted to the government (if I agree to take such stimulus
package; I really hope that the government will not twist my arm to
coercively accept that toxic stimulus package offered), but, in addition
to all that, I will be strangled not to fire employees, not to buy back
shares and not to pay executive bonuses. This is my own company, but
the government doesn’t recognize my full ownership of it, and tells me
how to run it, never mind that this may dig me into the ground.

151
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

THE DEVASTATION OF THE “GREAT RESET”

“COVENANT”—It would be interesting to observe from a bird’s eye
view of time, the paradoxical transformations which classical capitalism
underwent, especially during the twentieth century and counting,
having the West convert the neoliberal form of classical capitalism,
which modern times used to enjoy, into a post-industrial world,
denying market, profit and economic development. Curiously, at the
very same time of this conversion taking place in the West, a group of
former socialist countries were made to undergo first a pre-transition,
dragged first through the toil of neoliberalism. Only lately, these newly-
minted neoliberal countries began joining the West and began
experiencing the diversion toward the post-industrial goals of
homogenization, primarily goaded by financial mechanisms such as
eurofunds, for example. There will be more said later in this book on
the crucial importance of the financial prod as the main instrument for
achieving any goal, especially goals of social significance.
If we begin our observation from the latest developments
known as the “great reset”, we cannot but notice that, of course, under
the above-discussed “covenant” conditions, the small and mid-size
businesses will not be able to survive. What will remain are only the big
businesses. In fact, this is exactly the goal of the “great reset”; namely, to
wipe out the middle class, to impoverish the multitude and pauperize it
into becoming a beggar, who waits for the traceable (connecting
whoever the receiver of the money is with the purchase made)
government handouts, distributed according to one’s loyalty to the
party line—the party line being the homogenization of society, which is
the ultimate goal of collectivism. As a result, the new collectivist docile
personality of low-intelligence, only capable of resignedly obeying
orders, is to be formed. This “new personality” will be a far cry from the
“new socialist personality”, merged into the collective of the socialist
state, obedient to the postulates which were said to eradicate the bad
traits in the human being, the lying, deceit and laziness, while
affirming only the positive, unfortunately, ultimately creating only
an army of opportunists, but also a state incapable of dealing with
the inevitable dissenters, some of which were acquiring even covert
heroic status amongst the population.

152
  Non-Capitalist Capitalism 

This new collectivism, going by the term “great reset”, which

came to replace the original collectivism of the socialist state, carries
such social engineering to the extreme, paradoxically, through
pauperization of the multitude. The pauperization is exactly the
mechanism of bringing homogenization of society beyond the
collective sentiments symbolizing the “new socialist person”, now
setting the new goalpost—“new person of the homogeneous society”.
What this mechanism is will become clear later in this book.
Collectivism has always been dear to the hearts of the super-
wealthy elite as a method of governance over the multitude. The
collectivist idea went through stages of development. In economic
sense, the earlier variant tried, was the economy of a socialist country, if
we don’t count the short-lived Nazi state. There was a whole block of
socialist countries subsisting for several decades. The economy of a
socialist country could roughly be likened to the entire country
functioning as one single corporation, with all the hierarchy resembling
a private firm owning the means of production and distributing the
profits amongst the shareholders. However, the world super-wealthy
elite found this experiment to be impractical and removed that system
at the end of the twentieth century, as easily as it imposed it at the
beginning of that century. This overhaul reverted all the countries
participating in the socialist experiment back to the economy of
multiple private, small or middle-size companies, each one functioning
as a miniature socialist system within its confines, again, each one
company owning its means of production and distributing its profits
amongst its shareholders, all these miniature components in the form of
companies functioning within the large container of the country itself.
There are also multinational companies but, although also functioning
on a totalitarian principle, they migrate into the new world order of the
“great reset”, and they will be discussed separately. These multinational
companies, untouchable by the new order of the “great reset”,
comprise partially the holdings of the super-wealthy elite, mentioned
ever so often as the culprit of all the troubles of the world.

153
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Thus, speaking of the compound neoliberal system, fractured

into small totalitarian systems, comprising the private companies within
a country, this time, instead of the country ensuring the survival of
everyone, as does a socialist country, the individual companies are being
left on their own, each one individually having to prove the right of its
survival, dependent on how it fares in the marketplace. This, very
crudely, is the structure neoliberalism imposed on the former socialist
countries. As was mentioned, around the nineteen-sixties, the countries
of the West were already being pushed beyond their neoliberalism stage,
a stage practically akin to classical capitalism, into the post-industrial
world. Obviously, the former socialist countries were still not developed
enough to enter the post-industrial stage and they had to endure years
of transition under neoliberal command.
The market-oriented neoliberal model, fractioned into
separate companies, also failed because it caused overproduction due to
overconsumption, which created unrestrained inequality, a prerequisite
for social turmoils of unforeseen consequences, something that the elite
fears the most. Therefore, the latest discovery of the super-wealthy elite,
is that what is necessary, is restoration of the good old collectivism of a
single governance, this time global, and ultimately efficient. This is
bringing to a principally new level the collectivist socialist economy,
which was treating the whole country as one corporation, now set to
govern the whole world as one corporation.
The year 2020 appears as a threshold and a tipping point for
such conversion waiting to happen, whereby all the civilized world,
including the former socialist countries, could be rushed into the post-
modern world of slowing down economy and rejecting of market,
accompanied by a newly discovered, extremely efficient method of
digital fascism for ultimate societal submission and transformation into
a shape desired by the elite, which will be commented on later in this
book.
Thus, it won’t hurt to rehash—during the neoliberalism stage,
basically resembling classical capitalism, society consisted of myriads of
small hierarchically structured systems, private companies, much

154
  Non-Capitalist Capitalism 

resembling small socialist structures within the entire structure of

capitalism, as opposed to the one-company state of the socialist
country. Now, the process is reverted, going back to the, ideally, one
company world, however, this time functioning in a much more
efficient way due to the insurmountable suppression, on top of
meeting with no resistance from the oppressed—a perfect slavery.
The threat is really global and any local problems of the
countries, including the old-fashioned battles between political left and
political right are now becoming more and more moot, replaced by the
homogeneous plastiline-like biomass, devoid of any distinction between
its components, characterized by no individuality, whereby all
distinctions between people are abolished.
“THEGREATRESETTER” AS A PROPHET—Mind you
once again, “thegreatresetter” knows for sure that this is going to
happen and, according to him, this is going to happen exactly because
there is this specific post cov-crisis world, something which would not
have happened during other post-crises periods.
Notice also something else interesting—why are exactly these
three points chosen as restrictions? While adoption of restriction
expressed by the first point appears clear, judging from the overall
populist tone of “thegreatresetter”, as uncomfortable as it is for you to be
told by the government how to run your company, the second and third
points require clarification. Clarification is required as to why other
restrictions, in the stead of point 2. and 3. or in addition to point 2. and
3. are not postulated by “thegreatresetter”? For instance, why is there no
restriction on the government, preventing it from messing with the
private companies, messing which is putting not only the companies
themselves in jeopardy, but also their employees, who would face dire
straits if the company goes under, as a result of such intervention?Why
would the government be so declaratively concerned in words about
social issues and the welfare of the employees, while at the same time put
these same employees in jeopardy of losing their jobs by imposing
restrictions causing malfunctioning of the company? Let alone that your
company, being weakened by your own government, ensures
competitive edge to competing foreign companies for which

155
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

there is no “great reset”. I understand that this brazen neglect of the

other players on the world market arrives from the imperialist
conviction of the slavedriver—more on the slave driver later in this
book—that once his companies are restrained in a given way, through a
“great reset” in this case, this will affect the whole world because it is
your companies, the companies of the slavedriver, that command
everything else in the world. Fix them and you fix the world. This may
or may not be. However, the problem of harming the companies by the
“great reset” still remains. Oh, but, there must be a process of de-
growth, chimes in “thegreatresetter”, and that opens a new Pandora’s
box of problems, discussed elsewhere in this book (cf. “PUZZLING
REMINDER OF UNABOMBER’S MANIFESTO IN THE
OFFICIAL CONSIDERING OF DE-GROWTH”). Anyway, getting
the system out of tune does not prepare it for a concert performance,
but for a disaster.
So far, we saw what the restrictions will be, as postulated by
“thegreatresetter”. However, further, “thegreatresetter” goes on with
conjecturing about something happening all the time, not necessarily
due to a cov-crisis; namely, governments, on their own accord, mainly
due to populist needs, or giving in to external pressures, succumbing to
raising corporate taxes and going after the high pay to executives. Well,
that latter governmental intervention, now on government’s own
accord, we already saw in the stimulus packages’ covenant 1.3.
Therefore, the government’s own initiative for intervention, which
governments do anyway, cov-crisis or no cov-crisis, must be excluded
from the special effects which the post cov-crisis will have, mandating,
according to the “thegreatresetter”, the revolutionary so-called “great
reset”.
“CAPITALISM WITHOUT CAPITALISM” ABSURDITY—
Unpacked, all of the above means that what is proposed is “capitalism
without capitalism”, if such an absurdity is possible, whereby a
vanishingly small hyper-wealthy elite, enjoying the benefits of true
capitalism to its fullest, will use the government as its handler, to act as
an administrative tool to suck any creative juice flowing in the veins of
society, making the fruits produced by the companies go out freely into
the wider society, deflected by said elite specifically into the raunchy

156
  Non-Capitalist Capitalism 

pockets of society, which always cause trouble in need of extinguishing.

Thus, whoever had been unreasonable enough to establish and run a
business, now must work for these hyper-wealthy elite employers, to fill
in gaps which their own greed (the greed of the hyper-wealthy elite) itself
has created. All that, on the backdrop of the entire de-humanization of
the population, placed under never before experienced claws of
ubiquitous control, treating the population at large like a common
criminal, placed in the clutches of entirely abolished privacy, even
jeopardizing its very possibility to live, if that population has the
imprudence not to obey the directions imposed by said vanishingly small
insanely-rich elite. Later in this book it will be pointed out that these
directions can be summed up in one word—homogenization. The
greatest paradox being that the most vocal supporters of what is
portrayed as something very social and fair, academically christened the
“great reset”, misguided supporters hired to plunder stores and take
down statues, with the goal to remove a government which tries to bring
back some reason in the United States, instead of the questionable, to say
the least,“great reset”, are the real victims, which themselves are putting
the yoke around their own necks, while headed for the slaughterhouse.
These same ones, as veritable sycophants and cronies of the elite, will
look for the deficiencies in this book, seeking to label it with all slurs that
come to mind, rather than trying to understand the spirit of freedom
this book is soaked with, a spirit which may serve their own liberation,
by realizing what evil game they have been entangled in.
PARADOX—IF SCIENCE, THE STALWART OF
TRUTH, ALLOWS ABSURDITY, WHY NOT ALLOW
ABSURDITY IN GOVERNING SOCIETY?—By the way, speaking
of the absurdity comprising “capitalism without capitalism”, for
someone feeble-minded, to whom the absurdity of relativity sounds
reasonable, “capitalism without capitalism” surely also sounds
reasonable—science recognizes absurdities as something reasonable, why
shouldn’t the absurd “great reset” do the same? It is right at this
juncture, where anyone who is still with his senses, sees the great
significance of straightening out the fundamentals of science, aimed at
banning from its territories absurdities portraying themselves as science.

157
 DESTROYED COMMON GROUND
OF IDEOLOGIES AND THE
GREATEST DISCOVERY IN SCIENCE
-

“Anti-capitalism within capitalism” is a really dangerous demagoguery,

aimed at actually aggravating the enslaving bad sides of capitalism. The
only bright light of hope which shines in this world of darkness,
engulfed more and more by that seemingly subtle but, in fact, crude and
rampant absurd “anti-capitalism within capitalism”, is the absolute
truth discovered, regarding the most important cognitive as well as
public-policy phenomenon, with the widest possible societal
ramifications, over and above any social order—the discovered absolute
truth about the absurdity of relativity (cf. Addendum).
The absurdity of relativity, as pathological as it is,
shockingly, is the destroyed common ground of all
ideologies. This is the rotten core where all ideologies
coalesce and because relativity is absurd, the coalescing
ideologies are, at their very basis, absurd. This is an
extremely important fact to notice.
These ideologies are so shaky at their fundamentals that they
can win over each other only by the meanness of “out-rigging” elections,
or in the newspeak lingo—“out-fortifying” elections. There will be no
end to this mutual cheating on each other, during the course of which
the rich are becoming richer and the poor are becoming poorer. This
will continue until the mentioned core is straightened out by embracing
truth and rejecting absurdities. Of all the absurdities hampering science,
it is especially important to reject relativity and progeny—the efficient
rejection being through depriving anything connected with relativity
from financial support (cf. “Relativity is the Mother of All Fake News”
at timeisabsolute.org). No matter what ideas for a “great reset” or other
kinds of totalitarian control may be proposed and what modifications of
capitalism are invented, the absurdities, relativity being their epitome,
sitting at the core of all ideologies, will always create irresolvable
inequality and will always hold the potential for societal turmoil.

158
  Destreoyed Common Ground of All Modern Ideologies 

The allowance of the internal contradictions, defining the absurdity

known as relativity, to pass as science, is the be-all-and-end-all of all
problems humanity has, as repeatedly stated in this book.
As already strongly emphasized, the foundation of thinking,
science, crookedly allowing for internal contradictions to occupy and
govern it, makes, in a ridiculous twist of logic, the “anti-capitalist
capitalism” absurdity appear as a plausible option. Well, a naïve
bystander interjects, today’s mainstream science allows internal
contradictions, then, who are we not to admit internal contradictions as
the solution for the ills of society? Such a sick excuse for the absurd
proposal by the “great reset” for “capitalism without capitalism”, rooted
in the pathological character of today’s science, is the destroyer of
today’s society. It has become so omnipresent, that a reasonable
discourse on the matter has become impossible. The strong suspicion,
already expressed in this book, is that such muddled state of the
collective mind is advantageous to the elite, and that the latter is maybe
specially tolerating and stimulating that confusion. This, of course, is
only a conjecture, but I dare anyone to give me a rational explanation
for the continued major persistence of the at-once-detectable
absurdities in the most precious territory of human cognition, known
as science, the area supposed to be the dedicated stalwart of truth and
logic.

159
 PATTERN-EVIDENCE FOR THE
SAME PERIOD WHEN THE “GREAT
RESET” IDEA WAS BORN
-

THE GOLDEN PIER OF ABSOLUTE TRUTH—The already

absolute example, referred to many times in this book, of a crushing
proof which takes down a large part of contemporary physics, is a
shining example of the path one must follow when looking for
arguments also on other issues. This example was the guide when this
author was confronted, as almost everyone else on Earth, with the never
before experienced massive media attack, involving a purported peculiar
virus. How should I address this sudden attack, was the first thing that
came to my mind. From the tragic experience I had with the obvious
absurdity of relativity, a discovery I made over a decade ago, I knew that I
cannot trust any official source on anything. If the official sources allow
themselves to lie so blatantly about such outright, clear-cut nonsense, as
relativity, portraying it avidly on a world scale as great science, how can I
trust anything they say regarding issues which are nowhere near as easy to
prove? Like I said, to this day I dare anyone to explain why I should have
faith in any official news about anything, since the most important topic
of our time, the correct understanding of science fundamentals,
undermined by relativity, leading to undermining of thinking, is left to
the birds, and all one hears are immediately provable lies.
Nevertheless, I was asking myself the question, can I understand
the depth of the problem, never having been interested in such sort of
problem, having no special training in the area of the problem. It is true
that way back, I was accepted in medical school, fourth in a long list of
accepted students in the country. I did it for my mother because she
insisted that I become a medical doctor. However, once accepted, I
entered her office—at the time she was the Chair of the Department of
Pharmacy at the Medical Academy in Sofia, having founded the
Pharmaceutical faculty, together with her best friend prof. Anna Boeva
—saying, here, I did what you wanted me to do, but I’m not going to

160
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

attend medical school. Even then, I had the intuitive feeling that I have
to prepare myself with a steady knowledge in physics and chemistry.
These disciplines, I felt, are the only disciplines that would really
prepare me to meet the challenges of real truth. Now, I should thank
destiny for this choice. I cannot imagine that if I had become a
musician, which was my second choice, today I would still be
mesmerized by relativity because I would not have had the knowledge
and the machinery to discover that it is, in fact, patent nonsense.
Having discovered the truth about the absurd nature of
relativity, as well as making several other discoveries of no lesser order,
which I am discussing in other books, I confronted the coronavirus
conundrum head on. Having experience with the nasty relativity,
praised by the whole world, but finding singular catastrophic proof
about its absurdity, obliterating it from the root, the first thing that I
began thinking about is whether there could be an absolute criterion,
which would allow me to personally judge the reality of the suggested
menace, without having to rely on someone else’s opinion, no matter
what expert he is and no matter to what prominence he has risen. The
devastating experience I had with relativity did it for me. From that
moment on, stunned by the fact that all experts, without exception, are
corrupt regarding the most important issue of science ever—relativity—
there was nothing on Earth that I could trust, unless I, myself, find
absolute proof which I could personally verify. If there could be such
massive lying regarding the very fundamentals of science, lying that
nonsense such as relativity is great science, any lie is possible.
Thus, I started consulting the internet about old occurrences
of pandemics and this is how I found out about the 1918-1919
influenza pandemic. When reading about it, one very important fact
made an impression on me—said pandemic was illustrated by graphs
showing the number of all deaths, usually presented weekly, during the
course of those two years. This is when it dawned on me that there
cannot be any other absolute criterion at all to judge the reality of
massive medical social events, such as epidemics and pandemics, other
than the daily or weekly total number of deaths from all causes. Indeed,
there is nothing more final than someone’s passing and state agencies

161
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

ought to register that fact diligently, otherwise there will be all kinds of
ways to conceal such final criminal acts. That said, there must always be
a distinction made between the absolute proof for the absurdity of
relativity, which in its directness can be affected by no political or other
factors, on the one hand, and on the other, the evidence, albeit
governmentally supplied, of the number of deaths from all causes,
whereby there is no absolute guarantee that it cannot be altered for
political purposes, especially in the direction of overestimating it.
This much one can understand for sure, without the need for a
degree in anything. Thus, if we begin with such unquestionable facts,
about which no two parties will have disagreement, accepting, also for
no other choice, that governments are providing truthful numbers, we
will lay a solid foundation for a future quality analysis.
When a phenomenon is expressed as a number which is
compounded of several components and the same phenomenon at
a different moment remains the same, this means that if we
conjecture (with the goal to maintain that a health anomaly such as
pandemic has occurred) that one of the components has anomalously
swelled in size, then the remaining components must have, for some
unlikely reason, ebbed in exactly the right proportion. Therefore, if
the deaths from some new virus are reported to have grown
anomalously, yet the number of deaths from all causes stays the same,
then this would mean that the deaths from the deadliest diseases such as
stroke, infarction and cancer, must have miraculously subsided in just
the right number, in order to keep the number of deaths from all
causes constant. Such miracles, however, never happen, especially
week-after-week, let alone in concert in many countries. Therefore,
when observing no anomaly in the said number, the only possible
conclusion is that there is no epidemic in the country at hand.
While the absence of anomalous increase of the number of
deaths from all causes in the graph showing that number against the
consecutive weeks (recall that we call here the pattern exhibited by the
curves in these graphs “pattern-evidence”) is a firm guarantee of absence
of anomaly, ergo, of absence of epidemic, it is not at all certain that
seeing an evidence of anomaly in this pattern-evidence proves that the

162
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

bulge after many months of lockdown is due to the unknown virus, and
is not due to the other deadly diseases neglected medically during the
panic instilled by the lockdown. A case in point is the pattern-evidence
for Bulgaria. Similar pattern evidence is observed in other countries.
That is discussed elsewhere in this book.

Fig.2. Suspicious anomaly in the pattern-evidence of Bulgaria2

THE ONLY PATTERN-EVIDENCE DATA, UNCONTAMINATED BY

OTHER FACTORS, ARE FOR THE SPRING PERIOD AFTER 2020
LOCKDOWN—If there would be authentic, untainted evidence about a
claimed pandemic, it would be reflected during the first month or so
after the lockdown. Thus, in the case at hand, the pattern-evidence
analysis must be applied for the first months after the lockdown in
March 2020, when a purported cov-pandemic may be acting in its pure
form. The maximums which appear later, especially in November-
December 2020, have most definitely widely uncontrolled contributions
from untreated real, serious deadly diseases, untreated due to the panic
and the completely out-of-tune health system, geared towards cov-virus
only, leaving to the whims of fate the whole spectrum of the majority of
really mortal cases and planned surgeries. If that really is the case, and
there is no independent converse evidence, but rather the pattern-
evidence hinting in favor of such scenario, such play with the life and

163
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

death of billions of people by a symbiotically intertwined wealth-

monarchy-clergy elite, consisting of several irresponsible individuals
imposing their will on the whole world, borders on deliberate genocide.
Below, the data and analysis for both the USA and Europe is
shown for the exact period, which coincides with the period which
supplied “thegreatresetter” with his flabbergasting conclusions for the
need of “great reset”. As the pattern-evidence below shows,
“thegreatresetter’s” perception of the monolithic character of his
argument, shows cracks which may have greater significance for the
hasty “great reset” conclusions than initially thought.
UNUSUAL PATTERNS SEEN IN DEMOGRAPHIC
DATA IN SOME STATES OF THE USA—This study was reported
in a letter to The Lancet on 11 June 2020 and rejected from publication
without peer-review (not that peer-review is needed for such objective
absolute data) within days.
It should be clear that the scientifically unmatched rigorous
criterion for anomaly in the health status of a country is the number
of deaths from all causes for a given period. Because these data
are counted numbers of a final event, the time-lag for the acquisition
of the latest data notwithstanding, they are ultimately of infinite
accuracy and precision, which makes applying statistics of secondary
significance, if at all needed, when conclusions are drawn. Also, the
official reporting by the government of these raw absolute
numbers, subject to no additional processing, statistics or other
intervention, makes them free from speculation about their origin
and guarantees their unique reliability.
Figs.3 and 4 show a graphic representation of the data provided
by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention3,4 (CDC) for the
deaths from all causes in all the 50 states of the United States, as well
as, New York City, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia, for a
20 week period from the beginning of each of the years 2018, 2019 and
2020.

164
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

Fig.3. Characteristic maximums seen in the graphs of the 2020 all-cause-deaths in 12 states of the
USA shown on the y-axis, plotted against the week number since the beginning of each year. The
red line refers to 2020, while blue and green lines refer to 2018 and 2019, respectively.

Fig.4. No unusual patterns seen in the graphs of the all-cause-deaths in 41 states of the USA shown
on the y-axis, plotted against the week-number since the beginning of each year. The red line refers to
2020, while blue and green lines refer to 2018 and 2019, respectively.

165
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Except for some seemingly borderline cases, it is seen in most of the

above figures, that there is a distinct difference between the 2020 curve
patterns in Fig.3, compared to 2019 and 2018 curve patterns in the
same figure, as well as all the curve patterns in Fig.4. Fig.3 shows a surge,
in 12 of the states, of the total number of deaths in 2020 in the period
starting around the 12th week, going through a maximum roughly
around the 15th week of year 2020, and still subsiding at the end of the
reported period, the 20th week of 2020. On the contrary, in all the
graphs shown in this same Fig.3, the 2018 and 2019 curves lack the
prominent maximum seen in the 2020 curves.
Concurrent with the 2018 and 2019 curves in Fig.3 is the
pattern of all the curves in Fig.4, including the curves for 2020,
pertaining to the remaining 41 states of the USA. From Fig.4, it is seen
that the 41 remaining states have observed no unusual pattern in the
reported data of deaths from all causes, for all the three years, 2018,
2019 and 2020. The data from the two figures can be consolidated and
plotted as a single graph for the United States. However, this would
conceal the real vast difference in favor of normalcy which the majority
of states display compared to only about 25% of all 50 states displaying
anomaly.
In some cases in Fig.3, there are also some further details in the
fine structure of the curves, corresponding to the year 2020, in a
direction opposite to that of the 2020 curves containing maximums in
Fig.4. The discussion of these details is deferred to a follow-up study,
postponing such discussion for those times, which probably would take
several months, when the preliminary data for 2020 would have turned
into permanent data, as are the data for the years 2018 and 2019.
The main finding of this study; namely, the pronounced
difference between the expected curve shapes seen in approximately
75% of states, contrasting to the curves with maximums, seen in the
2020 data for only about 25% of states, is unequivocal even at present.
This imbalanced difference is an objective fact based on highly reliable,
pure, raw governmentally provided absolute numbers, devoid of errors
and uncertainty due to statistics, predictions and modeling. This
notable phenomenon, first reported here, can be seen by practically

166
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

anyone and needs no peer-review for one to conclude that it is real. The
shown unequivocal objective fact must be heeded and explained when
honestly analyzing the situation in 2020 in the USA and the world. The
above shown is enough to conclude that reconsidering of conjectures
and policies therefrom, regarding the alleged 2020 pandemic, must take
place without delay. It might be added also, that data for the same
period with the trivial pattern similar to the one seen in Fig.4, where no
maximum is observed, is provided, for instance, by the National
Statistical Institute of Bulgaria2. Exploring the here observed effect in
other countries will be left for a future study.
UNUSUAL PATTERNS SEEN IN DEMOGRAPHIC
DATA OF SOME COUNTRIES IN EUROPE–This study was
reported in a letter to The Lancet on 11 June 2020 and rejected from
publication without peer-review (not that peer-review is needed for
such objective absolute data) within days.
Observing of discernible anomalous patterns such as
maximums, not seen in the usual run of time evolution curves of the
raw absolute numbers for the deaths from all causes, provided by the
most reliable source of any country, its government, is the criterion
unmatched in its scientific rigor to assess the health status of a country.
In the previous analysis, a hitherto unrecognized phenomenon
was reported, concerning the number of deaths from all causes in 2020
in some states of the USA. This phenomenon, found upon inspection
of the official governmental data3,4, comprising anomalous increase and
then decrease within several weeks of the all-cause-deaths, is observed in
only about 12 of all the 50 states of the USA, for the latter part of the
initial 20 weeks of 2020, compared to the all-cause-deaths toll for the
same period in 2018 and 2019 showing no such bout. Moreover, the
official data3,4 for the remaining 41 states show that no such
phenomenon of all-cause-deaths number increase characterizes the same
period in the same three years, 2018, 2019 and 2020. It was noted in the
above analysis concerning the USA, that this new finding deserves
special attention because it has a direct bearing on the purported
universal reality of the pandemic claimed in 2020.
A similar hitherto unrecognized phenomenon, consisting of

167
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

governmental raw data revealing a pronounced anomalous outburst in

2020, occurring only in some countries, of the number of all-cause-
deaths, as opposed to other countries which show no such anomalies, is
seen also in Europe. As long as such governmentally reported raw data
are available and are plotted, the reality of whether or not a curve with a
maximum and a curve without a maximum differ, defies any doubt
even on the face of it, without additional processing of the data and
excluding any further speculation and modeling.
Firstly, the raw all-deaths-data, especially when it becomes
permanent after the acquisition time lag, comprise standalone
unchangeable final counted numbers, which are of infinite accuracy
and precision that speak for themselves. Also, being governmentally
generated makes these data of highest possible reliability.
Secondly, when these absolute numbers are presented in a
graphical form, no matter how much argument there could be about
borderline cases, discernment between a practically horizontal line and a
line with an expressed maximum, is like the comparison of two unequal
patterns which even an infant can tell apart. Thus, this study is an
example of unquestionable deductive conclusion about an immediately
observable real difference in absolute data, should such data be
available. This study is part of the wider search of this author aimed at
finding absolute, unequivocal criteria about the reality of claimed
phenomena or inconsistencies. Such criteria prove to anyone the reality
of the claimed phenomena or problems so obviously that peer-review
becomes unnecessary as a way of establishing scientific validity of these
claims, thus rendering these claims ultimately scientific. Start with
recognizing the absolute fact that no peer-review is needed to know the
claim that my hand has five fingers is real. The less the need for peer-
review of a proof about the reality of a claim, the more scientific the
claim is. The other two examples found by this author, of discovered
unequivocal scientific facts of substantial significance, are discussed
elsewhere.
Therefore, when the numbers for the all-cause-deaths are
available, as they are in the USA, as seen, the usual disagreements among
health professionals as to the reality of a health crisis due to a microbial

168
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

agent should subside, giving way to unequivocal conclusions. As

mentioned, there can hardly be any more categorical and scientifically
rigorous way to judge about the reality of a health crisis due to a
microbiological threat than by observing the time variation of the
absolute number of deaths from all causes. This is an objective criterion
of such strength, which makes medicine approach the austerity of exact
sciences. When such data are at one's disposal, anyone, even without
special training, can conclude unequivocally as to whether or not a
health crisis claim is real, only by visual inspection of the graphs and
observing peculiarities in them such as atypical maximums. Therefore,
the main stumbling block for an unequivocal conclusion regarding the
reality of a health crisis is nothing other than having such data at hand.
Luckily, these data for the USA are readily available3,4 and the
conclusions based on them, as tentative as they may seem today to some
arguing that their character is still preliminary, resulting from the delay
in acquisition, will undoubtedly eventually become unequivocal. For
Europe, access to this sort of data is more complicated and even
impossible.
Therefore, it should be appreciated that the gold standard
of demonstrating at once, without further ado, that there was
nothing unusual happening in the country, is the straightforward
way the raw all-cause-deaths numbers are presented by the
Bulgarian National Statistical Institute2—the graph of these raw data
is immediately seen upon following the link2. There is no other
agency in the world which not only has these data available for the
public, but is presenting these numbers graphically so directly on the
internet (cf. Fig.5).
Similar run of the 2020 curve, showing no peculiarities such as
maximums, and even lying below the curves for the same period from
previous, no country-lockdown, years, can be seen in the time curve of
the absolute raw all-cause-deaths numbers for three other European
countries, shown in Fig.6.

169
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Fig.5. Number of all-cause-deaths in Bulgaria plotted against the week number, corresponding to
years 2015-20202.

Fig.6. Absolute raw number of deaths from all causes in Germany5, Finland6 and Norway7 plotted
against the week-number for the corresponding year..

170
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

Unlike the possibility to immediately inspect the graphs by following

the Bulgarian National Statistical Institute link2, there must be
additional effort applied to plot the raw data and produce Fig.6,
although the numbers are publicly available in the respective links.
Plotting these data, as is done in Fig.6, shows that in 2018, which is
prior to 2020, when there was no lockdown, has shown more expressed
peculiarities, which should have caused heightened alert. Even the slight
exchange of position of the curves after the 15th week in the Germany
and Finland plots may not signal that anything other than the usual
quarantine measures is warranted, short of locking down of the
country. None of the 2020 curves in Fig.6 exhibits anything
extraordinary in their run. This study is specifically aimed at an unaided
observation of the raw data provided, so that a common person could
gain an impression of the situation by mere inspection of the plots. Of
course, further statistical analysis may be applied for the significance of
any purported unusualness in the run of the 2020 curves in Fig.6, but it
is hardly expected that anything significant will be found through such
additional efforts, especially in view of the clearly contrasting run of the
similar curves for other countries shown below.
So far, even if a remark from a punctualist may be added that
there is unavoidable delay in data registration, we may safely say that we
saw from the unequivocal data for four countries that there has not
been an unusual health threat in 2020 compared to previous years. This
conclusion coincides with the conclusion reached regarding 41 states of
the USA, as shown above.
Unfortunately, obtaining of the absolute numbers comprising
the deaths from all causes turned out not to be straightforward when it
comes to the European countries other than the discussed ones. This
author contacted a number of governmental statistical agencies in
Europe but only a few of them replied and even fewer provided the data
needed.
Therefore, in this study we will resort to an indirect way when
it comes to judging the health status of countries other than the
discussed ones. For this purpose presentations from the website of an
organization named EUROMOMO8 are used, providing processed

171
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

all-cause-deaths data for some countries. From these

presentations, the phenomenon already observed in the USA,
shown above, of absence of anomaly in these numbers for some states,
as opposed to the presence of unusual maximums in these
numbers in other states, found for the USA states, can also be
clearly seen in the curves concerning many countries of Europe,
although this anomaly is unnoticed by the authors of ref.8. Because
this study is only concerned with the drastic difference in the all-
cause-deaths time patterns in 2020 in some countries compared to
other countries, and the only available curves for other
countries were those provided by EUROMOMO8, it was to
be ascertained that the patterns seen in ref.8 are real and indeed
correspond to the only reliable time patterns seen in the plotted
absolute raw all-cause-deaths numbers, such as the ones shown in
Fig.5 and Fig.6. Thus, the available absolute raw numbers were
plotted back-to-back with the graphs provided by ref.8. As is
seen from Figs.7-9, an excellent correspondence is observed
between the patterns in the graphs which this author was able
to plot, using the available absolute all-cause-deaths numbers on
the one hand, and the graphs presented in ref.8
Concurrent with the above uneventful run of the 2020
all-cause-deaths vs. week number is also the run of the curves
shown in Fig.10 assembled from ref.8. Figs.7-9 gave assurance that the
run of the EUROMOMO8 curves reflects the real pattern seen when
the absolute all-cause-deaths numbers are used, at least in three
countries. So we may now conjecture that all EUROMOMO patterns
reflect the real state of the matters in the countries presented in Fig.10
when it comes to the lack of any anomalous health event in 2020.
From Fig.10, one sees that not only are there no unusual events
occurring in 2020, but in some cases, such as Austria, Denmark,
Greece and Portugal, there were events in earlier years that should have
caused more concern than the calm in 2020, purported as a
pandemic, causing unjustified lockdown of these countries.

172
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

Fig.7. Juxtaposition of the graphs from ref.8; namely, A1 and A2 with the graph B of the raw all-
cause-deaths data provided by ref.5. Graphs’ A1 and A2 ordinates represents z-scores calculated by
the authors of ref.8, while the ordinate of the B graph represents the absolute all-cause-deaths,
provided by ref.5. The abscissas of A1 and A2, as well as the abscissa of B show the week-number of
the corresponding year.

Fig.8. Juxtaposition of the graph from ref.8 A with the graph B of the raw all-cause-deaths data
provided by ref.6. Ordinates and abscissas are the same as in Fig.7.

Fig.9. Juxtaposition of the graphs from ref.8. A with the graph B of the raw all-cause-deaths data
provided by ref.7. Ordinates and abscissas are the same as in Fig.7.

173
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Fig.10. Run of the curve for the all-cause-deaths plotted against the week-number for the
corresponding year for 8 countries. Source—ref.8. We treat these patterns as being patterns reflective
of the genuine all-cause-deaths patterns, due to the reassurance by Fig.7-9.

In Fig.11 one sees a juxtaposition of a graph plotted with available

absolute all-cause-deaths raw data, with a graph for the same country
taken from EUROMOMO website8. This time one sees, both in the
processed and in the raw data, an appearance of a maximum in 2020,
slightly greater in the raw data, and even more expressly greater in the
less reliable data from ref.8, than maximums that have appeared in earlier
years.

174
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

In Fig.11 one sees a juxtaposition of a graph plotted with available

absolute all-cause-deaths raw data, with a graph for the same country
taken from EUROMOMO website8. This time one sees, both in the
processed and in the raw data, an appearance of a maximum in 2020,
slightly greater in the raw data, and even more expressly greater in the
less reliable data from ref.8, than maximums that have appeared in earlier
years.

Fig.11. Close similarity of the patterns in the all-cause-deaths curve from ref.2, curve A, and
the curve plotted from the available absolute raw data, curve B.

The close resemblance in Fig.11 of the patterns with 2020 anomaly, both
in the raw data plot and in the processed data plot from ref.8, gives
reassurance that the patterns in the following Fig.12 are real.
Although not raw data, but data seen to conform with the
patterns displayed by the raw data plots, Figs.11 and 12 speak for
themselves and can serve as a reliable basis for the conclusion that there
are a number of countries in Europe, as was already observed for 41 states
in the USA, in which no unusual health events occurred in 2020 (Fig.10)
in contrast to countries in Europe where a clear anomaly is seen in 2020
(Fig.12), as there are about 12 states in the USA with the same sort of
anomaly, as seen from Fig.4.

175
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Fig.12. Curves with maximums, assembled from EUROMOMO website8.

176
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

The absence of peculiarities such as maximums in the curve for the

number of deaths from all causes in 2020 is the most reliable
unequivocal scientific criterion that there has been no epidemic in a
given country. Absence of anomalies, such as maximums, in the curves
shown in Figs.4-10 indicates that any pathogenic agent, even if
unknown, such unknown agents appearing periodically throughout the
years, would be part of the usual mix of factors causing death. On the
other hand, clearly expressed maximums, absent during the previous
years, in the all-cause-deaths curves in 2020, proves unequivocally that
there has been an out of the ordinary health threat in that country.
Consequently, the fact that such maximums are not observed in many
of the studied countries in Europe, as well as in about 75% of the states
in the USA, speaks strongly in favor of the skepticism about the reality
of a pandemic in 2020.
The above proves that the extraordinary measures taken in
these countries with no anomalies (Figs.4-10) are unjustified. As in the
case of the USA, in the case of Europe, there must be further
investigation and explanation as to why such discrepancy in the health
behavior of countries should exist, especially provided the similarity
(except for Sweden) in the instituting of the age-old low-tech restrictive
governmental methods for limiting the effects of a pandemic.
Although EUROMOMO has marked with a yellow band,
only at the end of the graph, the data corrected for delay in registration,
nevertheless, questions may arise about the finality of all reported 2020
data at this point. Of course, in time, the raw data will be finally
established. In not more than a year’s time, all questions regarding the
preliminary character of these findings will vanish. However, even at
this time, the drastic difference in the run of the studied curves being so
pronounced that no acquisition time delay can be expected to smear,
the general conclusion from this study remains and it should be kept in
mind in all the analyses of the health events that may or may not have
occurred in 2020. Analysis of this kind must also become standard for
any future assessment of the health conditions of countries. Such
obvious differences in the time pattern of deaths from all causes in

177
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

different countries must always be given full attention. Ignoring these

differences amounts to nothing less than a prescription for а public
health, as well as а societal, crisis.
ANALYSIS OF “THEGREATRESETTER” DIVERGES
WITH PATTERN-EVIDENCE—Analysis of “thegreatresetter”,
presenting the common attributes of the countries that fare better
in confronting the alleged cov-pandemic, are discrepant with what
the absolute pattern-evidence shows:

1. From the pattern-evidence, showing no anomaly in 41 states in the

USA, it can by no means follow that they were better prepared
logistically and organizationally than the 12 states showing anomaly.
Similar discrepancy is seen in the data referring to Europe.

2. It cannot be surmised that the poorer countries—displaying small or

no anomaly—in Europe, had made more rapid decisions than the richer
countries—showing expressly greater anomalies.

3. It is unfathomable that poorer countries in Europe—displaying small

or no anomaly—have a more cost-effective and inclusive healthcare
system than the richer countries in Europe.

4. Poorer countries in Europe—displaying small or no anomaly—are

not high-trust societies in which citizens have more confidence in the
leadership and the information they provide, than the richer countries
in Europe.

The desire of “thegreatresetter” is obvious. He needs to portray that

more socially oriented societies were better in fighting the virus. The
absolute pattern-evidence data, however, does not confirm such
manipulation. The distribution of the pandemic peril, judged from the
pattern-evidence data, shows a different geographical distribution. The
harder hit are the peripheral European countries, while Central
European and Scandinavian countries were spared.
Judging from the pattern-evidence, it is not at all obvious that
the core values of inclusivity, solidarity and trust are elements which
determine the containment of epidemic. The mixed pattern character,

178
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

not at all discriminating rich from poor countries, the impossibility to

ascribe one pattern to countries characterized by higher solidarity,
inclusivity or trust, from other countries with lesser level of these
qualities, points to other factors responsible for the variation in these
patterns, not to the epidemics, if that was an epidemic at all. The reason
for these pattern variations may be the subject of study, but even at this
point, it is clear that their exhibit cannot have a uniform cause
applicable to all cases.
CORRUPTION CAUSING IGNORING OF AN ISSUE
—Coming close to home, thinking about the virus problems as a
pubic threat, corruption is the main problem when it comes to the
necessity to truthfully understand a problem. Epidemiologists,
public-health specialists, economists and social scientists, if
devoted to honest assessment, will all agree that there are
unaccounted for problems in the pattern-evidence, which have an
effect on the monolithic view regarding the reality of the cov-
pandemic. Very strong political factors, however, made it so that the
unequivocal pattern-evidence was made invisible to all, instead,
directing their attention only to arguments which can be
manipulated. One saw a 180o change of opinion of more than one
specialist, as soon as that specialist felt a promotion in the
government coming. Therefore, one must really heed the persistent
warning issued at the outset in this book—one must be very cautious,
to put it mildly, when taking a specialist’s opinion for granted. It cannot
be repeated too many times—the best way to build a personal opinion
which approaches or categorically reaches the truth, is to look for
absolute unequivocal arguments. This is the sentiment throughout this
book, and having such unequivocal arguments regarding relativity,
as well as unequivocal elements in assessing the reality of the
cov-pandemic, is the main motivator which made this author
consider penning (or “computering” or “wordprocessing”) it.
In this respect, there can never be too much emphasis on the
fact that the best example in this respect, unmatched by anything else, is
the possibility for one to see with his own eyes the unequivocal proof
that relativity is absurdity (cf. Addendum). Existence of such sort of
absolute proof gives a categorical answer to the question as to whether

179
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

or not relativity makes any sense—it unequivocally does not. This

discovery of the author makes him both proud and very anxious
that something must be done to liberate the world from that
nagging menace, alas, a mandate close to being impossible.
In other cases, such as cov-pandemic, its reality cannot be
decided absolutely, but there are absolute arguments such as the
pattern-evidence, which really shake the solid assertion that cov-
pandemic, so much pushed propagandistically, is indeed real.
There are also questions, such as the question about the reality
of anthropogenic climate change, which are inherently deprived of
possibility to produce unequivocal scientific arguments, one way or
another.
Returning to questions which are prone to answers, aside from
relativity, which the unequivocal proof mandates to be defunded
altogether, serious partial elements, comprising absolute truths
regarding aspects of it, indicate that “containing pandemic progression”
versus “reopening the economy”, is only a political question, depending
on the international pressures and having nothing to do with science. In
many cases, the cases where there are no anomalies in the pattern-
evidence, “reopening the economy” is not a choice—the economy
should not have been closed to begin with. This, of course, concerns the
first months after the lockdown, because later in the game, when panic
sets in, the mess becomes so thick, that “you can’t tell your knee from
your elbow”. Add to it the unbridled corruption of a business-
based model of health care, private profit-oriented pharmaceutical
companies, debased candidates for political fame, to whom
integrity means nothing, and all other components of low-lifeness, and
one must really be out of his mind to have any trust in these
unworthy machinations. The problem is that, as explained
elsewhere in this book, the marasmus of the intellectual morass is
so sticky and so elaborately designed, that one cannot stay out of it.
On the other hand, the unequivocal arguments presenting
absolute truths are the absolute unifier, which desegregates the
specialists confined to their narrow fields, as well as unifies the public at
large and allows all this manifold to generate a common truthful view

180
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

about a problem. More importantly, the absolute proof arriving from

unequivocal arguments, allows decision-makers to come up with
solutions on their own, without the help of experts, who are always
corrupt without exception—recall the example with the experts turning
180o in their opinion when they smelled political power. Also,
remember the “experts”, every single one of them, corruptly subscribing
to the greatness of the greatest travesty of science, relativity, caught red-
handed committing the ultimate prohibition in science, presenting
absurdity as something sensible (cf. Addendum). How can anyone
allow himself to listen to someone claiming to be a specialist? The hee-
haw of a donkey makes more sense than the expert’s opinion. Just
vanish the thought.
“GREAT RESET” NEEDS RUINED BUSINESS
AND IMPOVERISHED MULTITUDE, PANHANDLING
FROM THE GOVERNMENT—The continuing nastiness of
this whole operation is that it, further on, in view of the Nazi goals of
imposing the “great reset” on the world, aiming at the full ruin of the
businesses, in order for the businesses to become dependent on the
covenant-tied loans from the government, turning the businesses
into slaves to the government and practically having these
businesses cede their ownership to the government, the
servitudinous global mainstream media will keep stoking the cov-
pandemic myth as long as needed, until the elite is satisfied that it
has kneaded society and has ruined its business enough to have it
fall into elite’s palm of dependence and panhandling as a ripe pear.
This mafia-type racket by the government is unprecedented in its scale
in history, as its deviousness as a method and the scale it is conducted
on, boggles the mind.
Now, at this point of the book, we may want to make an
intermediate stop to review and lay out, in short, the plan for the
practical realization of the “great reset”. We will keep discussing these
points throughout the remainder of the book, but having these points
systematized may help in better understanding the uncovered ideas.
First, we will list the necessary conditions that must be available
for the “great reset”; that is to say, ultimate slavery, to take place:

181
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

• indefinitely prolonged arrest of society through made-up never

ending sense of crisis and discomfort

• result—planned ruined businesses and impoverished people

• removal of fiat money and replacing it with traceable unencrypted

digital currency, inevitably connecting the concrete user of the
currency with what the currency was used for

• result—creation of an instrument of detailed direct influence and

control over every single individual

• government issuing made-up debt to sell to banks

• result—generating the “free” “covenant”-tied money to give as

loans to businesses, as well as “free” “helicopter money” to
distribute among the populace, thus, buying out its loyalty

• abolishing privacy and introducing ubiquitous surveillance to

allow the creation of individual databases

• result—allowing for algorithms to calculate individual “social

score”

• distribution of the “helicopter money”—according to the

automatically calculated individual rating, a.k.a. “social score”

• homogenization—creation of the “new human”, whose

intelligence will not spread beyond the ability to obediently
produce what is being ordered

Thus, portraying the new world inhabited by uniformly shaped,

dumbed down individuals, goes beyond the imagination in the
nightmarish art-creations such as “The Wall” by Pink Floyd, but is
“enriched” by the insurmountable means of shaping up such

182
  Pattern-Evidence and the “Great Reset” 

individuals, not by the crude police force of the state, as all previous
totalitarian regimes have attempted, but is assisted by the
population’s happy, agreeable and even willing and enthusiastic
participation.
Notably, an essential moment, if one needs to understand
the processes labeled as the “great reset” going on, is that the above
elements must be taken in their totality. For example, it is not
enough to consider the ubiquitous surveillance alone, annoying as it
is, without realizing what it really is going to be used for—having
the new homogeneous personality—and how exactly it is going to be
used—by each individual creating his own “social score”-generating
database—and what the mechanisms of inducing that use are—
unencrypted digital currency, connecting the spender with the spent.
One hears various analyses and critiques of the “great reset”, but
never are those components expressed holistically, and that really
leaves the journalists and the public either bewildered, not
understanding what the big deal really is, other than causing obvious
annoyance, or the conclusions are led astray in barren directions,
which ultimately serve the elite. The matter is very cunningly
designed by this elite and superficial analysis, especially failing to see
the connections between the listed components, may appear even
desirable and that would serve smoothly the enslavement goals
of the elite as a “wolf in sheep’s clothing”. To say nothing of
the fact that this smooth enslavement would slide ever so easier
down the throat of the populace, as the stupefying of the
multitude, intended by the elite, progresses.

183
UNCERTAINTY IN CONCLUSIONS
-

One may not talk of conclusions, let alone of uncertainty of these

conclusions, when there is a distrust, on a very basic level, even
about things which the official mantra requires be taken for granted.
That trust sometimes may be hanging on a very thin thread, whereby
the official authority is blurred with official manipulation. When
it comes to business, this blurring most often is deeply concealed
within the other secrets of the corporation. Sometimes, however,
evidence begins to creep out into the open, pointing to
manipulation, despite the vigorous censorship through careful
prevention of leaks. Such episodes of sensed manipulation sometimes
may underlie a dangerous, wider distrust, justified or unjustified, in
society. CIA has introduced the flat-out term “conspiracy theory” for
anything that does not go along the approved “party line” and political
correctness. However, in not too few instances, the population can see
with its own eyes denied absolute truths, and that doubles down on the
fragile balance between trust and distrust, in the direction of distrust.
Some may recall the distrust of radio in the household of
“Downton Abbey”. It was only after King George delivered a speech on
the radio, that it gained the approval of His Lordship. Or, Dotty’s fear of
the telephone in “Miss Fisher’s Murder Mysteries”, because there is
electricity flowing in the telephone which may reach the center of the
Earth and cause the Earth to explode, so Dotty thought. History is
abundant with stories like these. They accompany every technical
development and today’s matters have not changed a bit in this respect.
Suffice is to mention the fear of 5G or the fear of the cov-vaccine. While
the fear of radio, telephone and fear of a carriage moving at a speed
greater than 40mph, because at a higher speed the brain will begin to lag
behind the body, are clearly unjustified—they are directly debunkable—
the roots for some of the recent fears may be understood to a certain
extent. Citizenry has no way of verifying directly some claims regarding
medical matters, one way or another. Medicine is not an exact science.
Unrestrained trust in doctors is the only possible avenue for the patient,
although doctors themselves relegate to consultations with their peers

184
  Uncertainty in Conclusions 

until they reach consensus; that is, until they reach the unscientific but
only possible conclusion under the circumstances. Furthermore, all
vaccines always have, no matter how disappearingly low, a finite
probability of causing adverse effects. This probability, however, has no
meaning when the victim is you personally—the probability then is
100%. Therefore, the decision to have yourself or your child vaccinated
has a very strong element of social responsibility, if the matter concerns
real vaccines, not properly tested vaccines. More discussion of statistics,
used either to justify or denounce medical decisions, follows below.
Therefore, presenting medicine as the “science”, which you must be
reckless not to obey, can be counterproductive when dishonestly
pounced on the population, because that population, at
times, encounters undeniable truths whose dissemination is officially
banned, but the word gets out, especially in these days of internet,
and that amplifies the mistrust, sometimes to the extent of not willing
to listen to any medical advice. Add to all this the corporate profit-
oriented essence of today’s healthcare and pharmaceutical industry,
and that completes the picture of the utter distrust of official
propaganda in many.
Truth and integrity, this is what the world lacks today, the
population senses that, and, if nothing else, it becomes apathetic,
disinterested and withdrawn. How can there be progress in a society
in which the population is sunk in apathy?
INSTILLING FALSE SENSE OF UNCERTAINTY—
Contrary to all legitimate concerns, expressed above, about the certainty
with respect to the reality of cov-pandemic and its impact on the world,
there is no uncertainty in one element concerning that cov-pandemic—
the pattern-evidence plots. This lack of uncertainty is ensured by the
only absolute criterion capable of proving, even to those untrained in
the secrets of virology, the existence of a health-anomaly in a given
country; namely, the absolute number of deaths from all causes, plotted
against time, usually provided weekly and, at times, daily by the official
statistical agency of the country. Unfortunately, these data, although in
most countries publicly available, but sometimes requiring some effort
to be dug out and plotted on a graph for immediate visualization, are
not so much outrightly suppressed in the mainstream media, but their

185
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

significance for the analysis of the reality of the pandemics is dwarfed to

the level of invisibility by embellishing other, very questionable, easy to
manipulate, numbers, detailing one particular component from the
entire mix of all causes of death. For example, it is seen with full
certainty from Fig.1 that in some countries, there is no health anomaly
throughout the entire studied period—their pattern-evidence plots are
flat. More regarding this figure is said elsewhere in the book.
In contrast, the mainstream media heavily promotes the really
uncertainty-laden numbers concerning, not the number of deaths from
all causes, but only the strongly suspect reported number of cases of
what the mainstream media allege to be due to the cov-pandemic. These
partial numbers are prone to rampant falsification, in addition to the
still insufficient level of understanding virology, let alone its connection
to medicine, despite the vigorous propaganda that they are the
“science”, providing the “unquestionable” truth about the purported
cov-pandemic. Actually, one can easily detect how much of a real
science it is, from the prominently displayed sharp disagreements
between the so-called specialists, considering that even when they have
reached consensus for lack of unequivocal understanding, that resorting
to consensus itself indicates lack of scientificity—real scientific truth is
not reached by consensus. Truth in real science does not depend on the
opinion of experts, it is not created as a result of their consensus. Truth
stands, unquestionable, on its own and the only job of the experts is to
see it, study it and accept it. When truth really matters, then it can even
be reduced to a form which is understandable, yet as rigorous, even to
people who have not had been exposed to science practice, as is the case
with the truth regarding the unequivocal proof of relativity’s absurdity,
seen in the Addendum. Especially challenging an absolute truth, may
only be due to it still not being well understood, or due to sheer
stubbornness and finagling, as a result of perceiving the truth at hand as
inconvenient, or for some other reason, unconnected with the subject
to which that truth pertains. Quite notably, the reluctance of an expert
to recognize the absolute truth or to ignore it, is a problem of the
expert, not of the truth itself. Of course, one, already armed with the
absoluteness of the number of deaths from all causes plotted against

186
  Uncertainty in Conclusions 

time, Fig.1 through Fig.12, which we call here “pattern-evidence”,

depicting the absolutely indelible picture of the real health situation in
the country for the studied period, one does not need to enter into
technicalities regarding the details of the consensus or disagreements of
the specialists on the partial issues of the alleged cov-pandemic. Even a
person untempted to become knowledgeable in the intricacies of
medicine, would discern if there are changes in these patterns, which
would allow, with a high level of certainty, one to reject the suggestion of
an epidemic, if no pattern changes are observed.
Now, while the lack of anomalies in the pattern-evidence plots
referring to a country is a categorical sign of the lack of health anomalies,
let alone epidemic, in that country, the presence of anomalies, on the
other hand, may also not be a sign of a pandemic due to a specific agent.
Such changes would at least require further study of the observed
phenomenon. Thus, the pattern-evidence excludes, in most cases, the cut
and dried verdict as to the epidemic situation of a country.
The human organism is a very complex system and when put
under stress, arriving even from a fictitious cause, the fine balance of this
complex mechanism may be swayed toward an unpredictable direction,
neglected chronic diseases and other morbidity factors notwithstanding.
Suffice it to say that, as much as gerontology may claim advances, the
theory of death and dying is still in its infancy and is largely unstudied. It
very well may be that the reason for that understudy is because
morbidity is not the most attractive topic to explore. Of course, here I
am just relating some unqualified speculations. However, it may not be
denied that the differences, in the observed several groups, of
characteristic pattern-evidence deserves a thorough in-depth study. Such
study will be based on really unquestionable firm evidence and has a
much wider democratic character because it will not be limited only to
groups with expensive specialized labs, but can even be carried out by
real scientists from specialties remote to virology, immunology and
microbiology.
Therefore, when using the pattern-evidence, it is not only not
incredibly difficult to assess the risk a pandemic poses, as
“thegreatresetter” admits for his purposes, but it is also possible that the
pattern-evidence may aid in making easier the understanding as to

187
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

whether or not there is a pandemic at all. Unfortunately, as said, this

direction, this time (basing it on pattern-evidence) of genuine scientific
exploration, is outright neglected by the world information stream.
This may be understood only as the expression of the desire of those
conducting the cov-pandemic indoctrination, to squash anything, no
matter how unequivocal for any impartial analyst, that would put even
a blemish on the consolidated cov-pandemic tool, which, tarnished by
questions about cov-pandemic’s reality, will not be as efficient for the
political purposes it is intended.
From the above, it should be obvious that no matter what the
deluge of data we are flooded with, no sensible conclusions, let alone
viable scenarios, can be put out, if those conclusions and scenarios are
not based on pertinent data and plausible methodology. As of today,
there is no more reliable methodology for a public health problem of
the sort of a purported cov-pandemic, than the analysis of the pattern-
evidence. While virology, as a science, should keep on its development
as every scientific discipline does, the practical urgencies of public
medicine need to convince decision-makers that when there are no signs
of pattern-evidence anomalies, they must not command a lockdown of
the country, independent of what other countries do or what their
comprador interests dictate. The decision-makers of the country must
not impose lockdown in absence of pattern-evidence anomaly, because
months later, exactly as a result of the lockdown, which has chased out
of the hospitals and the proper healthcare those with the real serious
diseases, some of these diseases unquestionably lethal, there will be
many more deaths, which, in absence of a lockdown, would have been
prevented. Thus, exactly this neglect of the otherwise treatable serious
diseases, the neglect caused by the lockdown in March 2020, may be the
reason for the observed mass deaths during the November-December
2020 period, as seen by the prominent maximum in the pattern-
evidence plot pertaining to the given country (cf. Fig.1).
CONTROVERSIAL ROLE OF STATISTICS—Statistics
is often presented as the method which is best able to assess the
uncertainty of conclusions, especially in public medicine. An
impression is created that once statistical analysis is carried out, that

188
  Uncertainty in Conclusions 

guarantees the scientificity of the findings and that somehow puts a

stamp of reliability on the conclusions regarding even complex
phenomena, such as the pandemics. This is far from the truth and
that does not apply only to medicine, but also to a plethora of
other disciplines, of greater or lesser closeness to real science.
Thus, we can widen the conversation about statistics regarding
the scientific character of the different disciplines, by taking as an
example the studies in the field of history. Adding statistics does not
increase the scientificity of the historical research. Neither does adding
results from statistics increase the scientificity of, say, psychology.
Statistics per se is not science, but is a method that properly serves only
engineering and the exact sciences, physics and chemistry, which history
is not, neither is psychology. Statistics itself was created by Galton,
Pearson, and Smith for the sole purpose of substantiating the pseudo-
science of eugenics, an attempt which ended in failure. Therefore, the
use of statistics in the humanities and social “sciences” (conditionally
speaking), should be avoided. As for historical “facts”, they are always,
at their very core, partial, every new discovered historical fact adding a
new nuance and sometimes even overturning the historical picture. Let
alone that every country in political negotiations uses the historical
“facts” mostly as it pleases. Therefore, when it comes to resolving
conflicts in the modern world, history should take a back seat as a
source providing arguments, giving way to political considerations,
alliances and balance of interests. Solving of such conflicts is a much
more complicated undertaking than the establishment of something
claimed as “historical truth” by one of the parties, but denied by the
other party.
SCIENTIFICITY OF A DISCIPLINE—Therefore,
uncertainty of conclusions is closely connected with the question how
scientific is a given discipline. When science is mentioned in this
conversation, what is meant is real science, not even “pure” science,
because the latter, qualified as “pure”, can slip the reader towards the
unreliable, imposing inference on concepts that can not be saved from
mediation; that is, excluding the à priori character of the absolute truth.
Such slipping is completely unnecessary for the conversation. Recall the

189
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

classics of German philosophy and their various lurchings to idealize

concepts such as a “mechanical” and “chemical” object, to say nothing
of “being” and “nothing”, “space” and “time”, “I”, and all sorts of other
details of the scientific foundation, giving them completely
inappropriate, undesirable intrinsic abstraction. Therefore, in order to
prevent the term from the deceit of undermining it by unnecessarily
imposed abstraction, “science”, without a qualifier such as “pure”, is
perfectly suited to be used in this conversation. Now, getting the
uncalled for imposition of abstractness out of the way, we are ready to
note that different concrete specialties have varying degrees of
scientificity, which is no less of an obstacle at times, even many times an
intrinsic obstacle. This obstacle is irremovable and in such a case, we do
what we can and sometimes, when appropriate, we even reach for the
tentative services of the above-discussed statistics.
When it comes to their scientificity, the list of disciplines, other
than the truly scientific physics and chemistry, may begin, in
descending order of their scientificity, with biology, zoology and
botany, reaching archaeology, not to mention the above-discussed
history, which, as said, can never be classified as anywhere near
scientific, given the requirements that are placed before real science;
namely, that its conclusions be the result of reproducible controlled
experiments.
NON-SCIENTIFIC CHARACTER OF MEDICINE—
Such non-science; that is, a discipline suffering to a great extent from
inherent uncertainty of conclusions, is also medicine, which more or
less has the character of technology, with direct pragmatic purposes—
curing the ill, rather than simply producing knowledge for the sake of
knowledge itself. Not to mention that even if medicine is assigned such
a task of only knowledge-producer, it is inherently unable to duly
perform it altogether, due to the completely uncontrollable nature of
the myriad factors that affect humans. The imperfections of medicine
as a science are also demonstrated by the fact that, in its main
conclusions, especially concerning public health issues, it has no choice
but to apply statistics and, in order to improve the picture in mass
diseases, it has not taken a step ahead of the rudimentary medieval
methods of prevention with face-masks, blockades and lockdowns, as

190
  Uncertainty in Conclusions 

was already noted. Even in medicine’s massive partial immunization

apparent successes, it still can’t find a truly effective vaccine to prevent
viral diseases like influenza or AIDS, let alone a cure when contracting a
viral disease. This shows that medicine is still lacking the knowledge of
the generalizing principles and laws which would allow it to exhibit the
certainty of predictions and outcomes a real science enjoys. The only
thing one does when having the misfortune of contracting a flu, is to
keep the room for three days and wait for the indisposition to go away,
while drinking chamomile tea with lemon, eating chicken soup—the
grandmother’s Vitamin C. Having in mind the difficulty medicine has
in its strive to reach firm conclusions, we here must specially distinguish
the incredible chance which the absolute pattern-evidence provides us
with, for the purposes of judging the existence of health-anomalies of
the sort of epidemics and pandemics in a country in the most objective
way possible.
HUMANITY HASN’T ADVANCED MUCH—Many
more people are desperately needed to participate in creativity. Now, if
we abandon for a bit the uncertainty of conclusions in medicine and
continue the above thought on prevention, one may argue that
precautions of the sort we are seeing today must have been introduced
during all instances of seasonal diseases. Wearing a face mask during
such periods, as well as staying home, are an advisable behavior anyway.
Airlines make a lot of money from air-travel, but there should be some
reasonable control of that travel-explosion. All this is beside the point
when the talk is about imposing political control through faux-
medicine. It is a special separate topic of attention. Discussing this faux-
medicine manipulative device of imposing elite’s will, occupies more
than a few pages of this book.
Unfortunately, the intrusive way of state control, even when
the medical threat is genuine, is easy and handy. State control has
retained its crude rudimentary stranglehold for centuries, not being able
to advance even an inch ahead beyond the blockades of cities, using
repressive force and forceful imposition of basic rules and lockdowns
on the population. Paradoxically, that brute medieval method of
physical distancing, found itself irreplaceable in a world vying

191
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

for more togetherness and uniformity. The immanent societally divisive

essence of physical distancing, cannot be mitigated by hypocritically
labeling it “social” instead of “physical” distancing. This is some sort of
a dialectical employing of opposites as a tool towards reaching the
ultimate goal of the elite—homogenization of society—which we will
discuss later in this book.
The rudimentary causes of fear, such as earthquakes, massive
fires and pandemics, are the best way to “divide and conquer”. Well, if
that is the case, why not create an artificial sense of disaster, the most
efficient of which is fear of epidemic, respectively pandemic, and slide
the population down the slope covered with snow made by the snow-
machines of lies and deception, and have the population at large
entrapped in the valley, ready to obey.
Therefore, telling the tales of real pandemics that have marred
Europe and the world is a non sequitur. On the contrary, connecting
what today very well may be a pandemic hoax, with the real pandemics,
is a trick to make today’s possible hoax feel realistic. It is also a disgrace
and defamation of the real victims of real pandemics, as well as an
offense to every sufferer of a deadly disease, to have him used as an
unwilling actor in a propaganda war. The real story of today’s possibly
artificially manufactured epidemic, respectively pandemic, threat, has a
completely different genesis, albeit quite clear political goal.
ULTIMATENESS OF REAL SCIENCE—It is clear from
the above that in real science, there are truly absolute criteria of fidelity,
ensuring in many cases, the absolute certainty of conclusions, which, as
we descend down the pyramid of scientificity, become increasingly
fuzzy, until we reach the pronounced non-sciences, such as social
“sciences”, and further enter the territories of art, where there are no
more criteria, even for aesthetics, except for the iron rod of the
market. The same movement characterizes the truth, which is also the
determinant of scientificity (no, not falsification, which we discuss
elsewhere), the truth that completely dissolves and disappears in the
arts. On the other hand, in theology, because of its dogmatism, the
truth is absolute if we decide to immerse ourselves entirely in this area.
In the only true sciences, physics and chemistry, things are in-between

192
  Uncertainty in Conclusions 

—the absolute truths reside at their core, and the movement of these
sciences, as it were, is accomplished through relative truths, which are
sometimes fortunate enough to become absolute truths, while in many
cases the relative truths do not live up to the determining criteria for
truth and are thrown overboard.
The essence of science are the phenomena whose guarantor for
realness is the correct application of the scientific method. The latter is
independent of any changing circumstances, and is, therefore, the
absolute guarantor, a guarantor coming up with absolute conclusions,
especially in their constant phenomenological essence. That guarantor
does not depend, unconditionally at that, on changes in the world,
whatever random currents of situations come upon us. The realization
of this fact is a great achievement of the western civilization. It is
precisely the extraction of the essentials of a phenomenon, in order for it
to be accurately described and explored in depth, that is the criterion of
intelligence and even genius, when in the eye of the lay person, things are
mostly in some kind of chaos, and such person, frightened, does not
know where to begin.
Let us recall Galileo, sitting in one of the pew rows, peering into
the swaying of the chandelier hanging from the ceiling, as everyone else
was reading a prayer in the Cathedral of Pisa. Why was Galileo looking
at exactly this, and not trying to trace the path of the ant moving on the
Church floor amongst the pews? Of all the interesting things possible,
Galileo seemed to think that even the most uninteresting, the swaying of
the chandelier, deserved his attention. Wasn’t he aware that this is an
ever-changing world and it cannot be covered, so all he has to do is
engage in understanding the laws that rule thought, as does philosophy,
not staring at various chandeliers. Galileo, however, was a genius. He
understood well that what for the Aristotelians is some kind of a
constrained stone allowed to fall, is actually a pendulum that can be
described, based on its inherent parameters, so that the newly discovered
relationship, revealing that for small amplitudes the pendulum period
does not depend on the amplitude in question, is valid for every
pendulum. What ..., didn’t Aristotelians have a ruler or a watch on
hand to make the discovery? They had, but did not have Galileo’s genius

193
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

to allow themselves to observe a specific object, extracted from the

manifold of objects and phenomena in the infinity. A discovery such as
this, or the law of Ohm, or of Poiseuille or Ampere, is not subject to
contingency, but is always valid under the defined conditions. These are
the pearls abstracted from infinity, that adorn the crown of what
defines us as humanity. What is valuable about such research is that it
does not rely on the empty shells of concepts, such as those which
determine the beginnings of philosophy, but deals with the concepts in
their flesh and blood. Thus, scientific observations, unlike
philosophical observations, are as specific as possible, but not sterile.
Scientific observation is tailored exactly to the object to which it should
be adapted, and is not intended to study everything, which, if intended,
would actually mean that it does not study anything. The specific
object of study by science is universal because it specifies exactly what
the study is about, which trivializes the philosophical abstraction of the
object as such. Well, what about that? This abstraction of the object as
such is implied when doing science. This noting of implied abstraction
may be the only reaction of someone who is familiar with the ingenious
scientific discovery, but the philosopher comes to annoy him with his
abstractions-laden generalizations. One should avoid like the plague the
flooding with trivialities, which the philosopher likes to exercise,
trivialities packaged in terms that were supposed and advertised to be
some abstract original laws of thought. In contrast, the real scientist
needs to understand how the length of the pendulum is related to its
period and amplitude. You can start with a hypothesis, but you won’t
get away with the hypothesis if what you are saying is at odds with the
physical meaning, even if you have adopted the posture of a side
reflexive observer, as the philosopher likes to think of himself. To take
such a posture is an easy job. In contrast, you tell me how you will
summarize the rocking of the chandelier, to describe not only every
pendulum, but also to lay out the description of all the periodic
processes—this is really the very summit of the intellectual effort.

194
POLITICAL PIVOT OF THIS BOOK
-

In the paragraphs that follow, I will take the liberty to be maximally

honest about my personal take on the political milieu in the United States
and the world. This may not be the most advisable thing to do, it may be
even reckless under the current post-modern totalitarian regime, but at
least it is in defiance of the maxim “I have an opinion but I don’t agree
with it”, well known to those who have experienced the earlier, less
sophisticated versions of totalitarianism. These current convictions of
mine regarding the main topic of this book, which I expressed more
cautiously and contingently in the previous part, stem from the pattern-
evidence, which I already discussed. Why is this sudden change of tone
popping up, succumbing to greater categoricity? It arrives from the fact
that in the text below, I am expressing my own feelings, which I know for
sure, and am not speculating about matters which I only read about,
written by “thegreatresetter”, without really knowing the depth of his
intentions.
Certainly, the categoricity regarding my discovery that relativity
is absurdity, cannot be anything but firmer than ever because the proof I
have presented can never be challenged or adjusted to someone’s taste (cf.
Addendum).
Of course, while remaining ever firm on the pivotal absolute
truths I talked about, and the unequivocal conclusions therefrom,
especially regarding absurdity of relativity, my take on the rest of the
discussed matters may change in future with learning more about these
matters. Such change of views is usual for a thinking person who seeks
the truth, which is incomparably more difficult to establish in the social
matters than in matters of science, especially when the scientific matters
are deliberately messed up by some not too able individual, which makes
them even easier to unpack. After these few introductory words, I will
dive into my current understanding of the world issues.
As has become already clear, I see as the main political problem
of the world nothing other than the concentration of financial wealth
into the hands of a disappearingly few individuals, allowing them to

195
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

shape the world according to their personal tastes and interests. All the
talk about

• economic details

• crises

• collapses

• financial capital taking over and suppressing the industrial capital

• job market

• inequalities

and

• social unrest

is just a discussion of the consequences which this undeniably existing

group of super-wealthy individuals has induced. Let us start with this—
no matter how much someone tries to oppose the view that there is
such individual control of the world, exerted by these few individuals,
unelected by anyone, whose only credentials consist in the money they
own, the fact that, for example, someone may own privately a news
agency of global impact, should mean something.
As a matter of fact, this unbridled personal power, based
exclusively on owning money, which may easily overwhelm any truth
and reason, may signal that, for instance, the idea of pandemic may be
made up to serve the political purposes of concrete individual interests.
This suspicion is bolstered by observing the pattern-evidence presented
in this book in the data provided by a number of governments for the
deaths from all causes. The fact that for many countries there are no
anomalies seen in these data, counters, in my book, the suggestion of a

196
  Political Pivot of this Book 

pandemic, the fuzzy definition which even international health

organizations waver about notwithstanding. This puts into question the
whole initiative of writing “great reset” propaganda books proposing the
logical chain cov-pandemic→cov-crisis→great reset”; that is, proposing
the suggestion that a cov-pandemic, questionable in its own right, is the
cause for the unquestionable cov-crisis and that the latter, on its part, sets
in motion something unusual called “great reset”. Writings about such
unsustained cause-and-effect claims appear more like a compendium of
talking points rather than a serious read.
CORONAVIRUS’ UNIQUE POLITICAL STAGEFACE
—Never has the world experienced on such a grandiose scale, the use of a
purported medical condition engaging the whole world, for the purposes
of reaching a concrete political goal. There were real pandemics in
history, but their arrival, proceeding and subsiding, were driven by real
medical conditions and circumstances. The 2020 cov-pandemic does not
appear to be one. Its only goal is to create the seemingness of doom,
gloom and fear, so that the new central governance of the entire world
would be shaped-up to the desires of the hyper-wealthy elite, into a more
acceptable form for swallowing by the world population. Without this
pandemic instrument of insidious global control, the world had to be
prodded into submission to the elite, in a panic to save its skin, with
much more effort and for a much longer time. Now, the spurious ghost
of pandemic makes it fast and easy—the changing of presidents like
handkerchiefs looking like a breeze. The dream of the designers of this
fakery is to create the feeling that there will be things that will never be
the same. Even better, that such state of medical prison would keep the
mouths shut forever, amidst a chaos allowing catching of fish in muddy
water. Thus, in this pandemonium of an entirely twisted political process
driven by massive scare, one basic element, that of digital totalitarian
control, would have been installed not only without opposition, but
even with joy, around the target date of 2030. Many different ways were
tried by these controllers, two major types of totalitarian systems were set
up in the twentieth century for the purpose. However, the currently
imposed biologically-based ideology, the expanded eugenics of the

197
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

current Nazi times, including, in addition to the classical racism of the

Nazis, the entire fan of biological and medicinal traits and beyond, are
now wrapped up as a new advanced ideological tool in the
determination to achieve the final governing dominance over society, by
the elite of the super-wealthy, in their strive for self-preservation.
Calling this tool post-industrial society, post-modernism, globalism or
“great reset”, will make no difference. It’s all the same.
Of course, these real goals aimed at governing the world, reside
behind the smoke screen of concern for the businesses and individuals.
What else is one to expect—the vile forces to confess that they are vile
and proceed to go about their power-thirsty business? Really? As a
matter of fact, that might have also worked. What is an individual, a
commoner, an outsider to these elite circles, supposed to do, facing
these Goliaths, even if they frankly confess openly about their real
enslaving intentions? Is joining groups to loot stores or take down
statues going to change anything? Don’t make me laugh, would be the
response of every reasonable citizen, to say the least. Besides, even if
citizenry stays calm, realizing that it is useless to show dissent openly, in
its soul it will be demoralized nevertheless. No one knows where this
built-up dissatisfaction may go one day.
The expected condescension is also heard—don’t complain too
much. What we have served you, that feeling of restraint that we have
served you, may give you a chance for retrospection and, who knows,
for even creativity. The expected underground creatures, hoping to
make a morbid opportunistic buck off of the widespread promotion of
the pneumonia threat or what have you, crawl under the feet of
everyone, offering their hastily half-baked antibody serums. When there
is an opportunity, there is never a want of go-getters. The age-old play
with sentiments of fairness and class divisions is once again regurgitated,
in front of a now very timid audience. The sword of Damocles, in the
form of a pandemic, hangs over everyone’s head. Now is the moment to
creep in the leitmotif of this whole exercise; namely, the governance of
the world. Initially very slowly, and almost inauspiciously, only to gain
momentum in no time, roaring like the steam-engine of the
despicably forged elections.

198
  Political Pivot of this Book 

The imagined flame of pandemic has to be incessantly stoked through

the thousand mouths of the world media, every day, on almost every
square inch of the newspaper, magazine or website, pounced almost
every minute from the TV screens and running into the kitchen sink
every time the tap is turned on or every time the fridge is opened. The
flow must keep going—it has been paid for, expecting return on
investment many times over, in the form of power, more power and still
more power over the world. The money follows. The feeling of crisis
must be kept alive and any hope for return to the state of old habits
must be forgotten. One is reluctant to use for this new state the term
“new normal” coined for the purpose, because such a thing can never
take steady hold on society. It has been tried more than once through
different designs and it could hardly survive for more than half a
century. Today’s counter-utopian “new normal” will not survive even
half the time the previous exercises did. Human nature is a complex
thing and anyone who feels he is the Messiah who would successfully
social-engineer it, has always met with a huge disappointment.
Humanity always manages to slip out of the fishnet, then sacked again,
only to keep slipping out every time it is curbed. This cat-and-mouse
game is never ending but with the dramatic concentration of the
financial might in a few private hands, it becomes more elaborate and
nasty. Of course, it would be rash to predict the meanders of that
mutual pursuit.
THE PURPORTED PANDEMIC IS A GOLDEN
CHANCE FOR REFLECTION ON DEMOCRATIC REAL
SCIENCE—Amidst all this rumination about the scientific truth, the
reasonable reader, being convinced by the unequivocal evidence in the
Addendum, whereby even a pedestrian can become privy to the
absolute truths of global importance by solely using his own devices,
encounters another opportunity provided by the pattern-evidence
presented in this book. The pedestrian in question sees, in the absolute
truths, revealed when seeing the pattern-evidence connected with the
purported cov-pandemic, another golden chance to appreciate the
power and significance of scientific thinking, and to realize that the lack
of that power, the power of scientific thinking, can even be lethal. The

199
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

emphasis must specifically be put on “scientific thinking” of the

individual himself, not on philosophical ruminations, or trust in what
experts are saying on the TV in their shaky consensus. The revelation of
the absolute truths for everyone to have in his arsenal of tools for
understanding the world, is the most democratic device there could ever
be for the concrete individual to improve his worldview, relying only on
his own personal efforts.
UNILATERAL COOPERATION—Nonchalant about the
shakiness of the cov-pandemic→cov-crisis→“great reset” cause-and-
effect proposal, “thegreatresetter” offers cooperation as the panacea to
confront the impending ill effects from it. However, the cooperation
which “thegreatresetter” proposes, is required from the others, not from
the few super-rich individuals telling these “others” to be cooperative.
When will we see, in the spirit of “cooperation”, these select few super-
rich really dispense with their holdings, not through tax-relief charities,
but in the real sense of the word, in the name of the others? Moreover,
what is meant here are not only those who control enormous personal
wealth, which makes them capable of installing governments to their
liking through creating, with impunity, the atmosphere for the elections
to be demonstrably rigged, but also their less wealthy supporters.
Under this suppression of the democratic voice, in effect causing a clear
social cleavage, a division in society between governing elite and
governed multitude having no say, it is also relevant to ask, what can
anyone else, who does not belong to this monied elite and is the
victim, do about that blatant undemocratic injustice, other than
write books and self-publish them, for as long as he is still allowed to
do that?
The small elite-collective of the untouchables, controlling the
world through their boundless finances, includes also quasi-dictators,
who, although seemingly democratically elected, control inane amounts
of corruption money, thus capable of efficiently interfering in other
countries’ elections and destroying the workings of entire political
unions. Who these individual uber-rich world-controllers as well as
quasi-dictators are, is well known and one does not even need to name

200
  Political Pivot of this Book 

them. A case in point is the coup d’état committed in March 2020

against the incumbent President of the United States, by forcefully
imposing on the world, through the global media privately owned
by the super-wealthy elite, the hoax of a pandemic, thus enabling
the skewing of the normal political process. As a matter of fact, the
cronies installed by those forces began actively sabotaging the newly
elected President from the first day of his inauguration in 2016.
However, it was obvious that, through the years, their efforts remained
in vain—the population at large did not pay attention and the country
seemed to be swaying its course away from the post-industrial intent for
the globalist control of the elite and its militaristic methods. The
population at large was enjoying the new liberty and self-
determination, most of all, enjoying the USA abstaining from
engaging in new wars. That detachment of huge masses of the
population from the grips of the centralized slavedriver control, was
not going according to the plan of the mentioned elite. It meant that
the elite is not that powerful and can be overcome by the people.
Something had to be done, in addition to all the hearings and massive
bombardment with lies and insinuations hurled from the speaking
trumpets of their accommodating privately owned media.
This massive apathy of the ruled, ignoring the goad of their
master, denying to even recognize the elite as their master, required that
something serious and efficient be thought of and done, aimed at
engaging every single person with the post-modern, globalist agenda of
the said elite. Most importantly, as the first step, something had to be
done to make every single commoner, without exception, pay attention
to the call to remove the incumbent President, non-compliant with the
post-industrial agenda, while his hands are being efficiently twisted and
even tied behind his back, figuratively speaking. The vile words, the
outright lies, the unrestrained vice spewed by the mass-media,
controlled by this same select completely-out-of-the-ordinary wealthy
elite group, is unsurpassed in the entire history of America, respectively
of the world, in view of the world impact of that elite. These less than
no good propaganda devices, going by the moniker global mainstream
media, massively privately owned by the super-wealthy elite, were
harnessed from the first day of 2016, military style, even if the policies

201
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

they espouse and broadcast would lead to indirect mass murder of

innocents and the destruction of the country.
UNQUESTIONABLE REALITY OF THE
CORONAVIRUS—Make no mistake, it must be made perfectly clear
that I personally have no reasons, as of today, to doubt that the
coronavirus in question does exist, causing tragic consequences to some
patients, as these sorts of viruses, mostly new to virology, are causing
every year. However, as far as whether this real virus is indeed
responsible for the advertised cov-pandemic, and is not only used as
some plausible but in fact overblown agent, alleged for political
purposes to cause a terrible real pandemic, is a question which no
commoner can really verify personally. All such commoner can do is
trust the massive propaganda spewed by the privately owned media.
However, as said, judging from the outright massive lies which the
propaganda has been aggressively blasting throughout the world for
over a century, falsely presenting the absurd relativity as a genius theory,
but which can be immediately directly verified to be a lie, personally, by
every single commoner individually, just by consulting the Addendum,
allows by analogy, every single commoner to distrust with all his heart
and consider a lie anything else which the official propaganda is
militantly dumping over the head and soul of said commoner.
The only reliable, personally verifiable data, regarding the
reality of cov-pandemic, as are the data focused on the concrete virus,
massively reported by the propaganda, are the data for the total deaths
from all causes, devoid of any potentiality to be manipulated for
political purposes. These data are provided daily or weekly by the
governments of the countries of the world. The mix of reasons for
death always contain an insignificant component attributable to death
from a viral disease. The conscienceless, deeply immoral propaganda,
plucks this sole component out of the entire mix of much more deadly
diseases, but which do not have the social-contagion component and
therefore are not interesting as a tool for social manipulation. The
propaganda, then, begins to build stories around this particular,
objectively less dangerous but socially spreadable disease, for the
political purposes of instilling bespoke crisis. Tales are openly told,

202
  Political Pivot of this Book 

not sparing gruesome details of tragedies which always accompany

even this relatively benign sort of disease, compared to the really deadly
diseases, useless as social instruments, scaring everyone in this particular
direction, making all other diseases, deadlier and scarier, be forgotten.
The deviousness and meanness of this way of manipulating society and
directing it towards pre-set political goals really boggles the mind. It is as
glib as can be because the individual is helpless in really putting his
finger on the problem. The individual can always be sternly disciplined
to only listen and obey and not interfere with his incompetence in
matters which he does not understand, completely ignoring the fact
that the elements promoted as competent specialists themselves are
struggling with the reality of the purported phenomenon. This struggle
is evidenced by the demonstrable disagreements among these specialists,
the most which they could reach being consensus, which is also a proof
for the lack of real scientific resolution of the matter.
If, however, the total number of deaths from all causes remains
constant in time, and also does not differ from that number from
previous years, this means that not only the rest of the components, but
also the component due to viral diseases stays the same, indicating that
nothing unusual is happening, not even epidemic. This has been the
case in many countries (cf. Fig.1) and this is the only unequivocal fact,
which the individual person can use as a protection from the barrage of
lies he has become a victim of.
Moreover, and this needs to be repeated, because of basic
moral and ethical norms, mass media never announces, let alone
describes in excruciating detail, the tragedies taking place in
hospitals. It especially never focuses on describing the tragedies
occurring in the hospitals caused by a selectively chosen lethal
disease, ignoring the profound tragedies caused by the rest of the
much more deadly real diseases, creating the impression that the
targeted disease, usable for social manipulations, is the ultimate
source of the horrid tragedies occurring in hospitals. This time,
however, such details were outed massively through the global

203
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

privately-owned mass media, with the evil intent of instilling a designer-

panic with clear political motivation and innuendo.
Not that the incumbent President was not warned about the
demonstrable manipulation—the pattern-evidence data were sent to his
cabinet at the beginning of Summer of 2020, around the time of
“thegreatresetter’s” writing, to no avail. These pattern-evidence data
were ignored by the Office of the President, instead of making these
pattern-evidence data immediately known to the nation, alerting it for
the coup d’état taking place, aided in this extremely subversive, never-
before applied, way of undermining the central power, and cancelling
the elections, or at least warning that he will not participate in elections
doomed to be rigged by that innovative false-pandemic deformation of
the electoral process.
Not that these data were not sent for publication in Nature
and The Lancet, from where they were promptly returned by editors
with suspiciously sounding names, without even sending these pattern-
evidence data to peer-review—not that peer-review is at all needed in
view of the absoluteness of the facts seen in the pattern-evidence graphs,
as well as the conclusions following from these absolute facts, presented
in these two letters to the Editor.
PARROTS OF POLITICAL THOUGHT—I understand
and share the anxiety of some about a foreign dictator interfering in
domestic politics. However, this is the job of the enemy; namely, to
attack. The job of a country is to efficiently fend off such attacks and
one cannot blame the yet unelected president, prior to 2016, for not
protecting the country. Thus, in accusing someone not yet in politics
for not protecting the country from the attacks of a foreign enemy is
again “the thief hollering, catch the thief”.
It may be noted in this connection that a dictator’s fate is
historically doomed. On the other hand, it is no coincidence that the
twelve absolute oligarchies—the monarchies controlling Europe—still
stay intact, some for eight centuries on end. The principle of their
construction is different from the mafia-type oligarchy, spontaneously
born elsewhere around someone who has become a dictator, but
dressing up in a new attire every time the old dictator is replaced

204
  Political Pivot of this Book 

with every new one. In contrast, there is oligarchy in its own sense, only
when that oligarchy is so set up, that it always stands more than an arm’s
length away from any bickering and struggles. In a mafia-type quasi-
dictatorship, today’s clientele of someone will be replaced by someone
else’s clientele tomorrow. The absolute centre of such integration
around one detached center of power is lacking, and therefore any
reasoning on the issue of power cannot be, in principle, but is only
contingent and, therefore, not of great interest to the theory of politics,
which, on the contrary, looks exactly for such absolute power center.
Thus, equality before the law is not the be-all-and-end-all in this respect,
because that equality depends on the structuring of this law and
whether it ensures such a permanent center. Therefore, the reasoning
regarding the essence of the notion of nation would make sense, if it
complied with the rule of law obeyed by the mentioned “twelve”. So,
we can’t begin from judgments, such as equality before the law, if we
want to properly unpack both old and new history, as well as when we
need to build stories for the near future.
Let alone, to blame the otherness, when marrying someone
from another village, which is a way to avoid inbreeding. Proceeding in
this vein, one may ask, is there anything better than globalism as a cure
for this source of pathology—inbreeding—if we are to act as
advocates for the devil? Of course, for a village it must be true that
inbreeding is bad and opening to the wider world will help improve
matters with reproduction. However, the world is not a village, despite
that known bland metaphor. It is way more complex a system, which
doesn’t bear such simplistic analogies, especially when globalism
comprises enslavement of the weaker cultures and turning the society of
the slavedriver into a totalitarian society, as are the real intentions of the
globalism favored by the “great reset”, which signifies the triumph of
the post-industrial, post-modern society. This real essence of
the slavedriver-slave character of the proposed globalism will be
discussed in more detail shortly.
Even less true is the insinuation of some that democracy was
once something progressive, but then, at other times, it became
regressive because of some bad conditions. When we have twelve

205
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

absolute oligarchies watching over the main issues, what the vectors
pointed to by these oligarchies are, which the ants were following, are
only details.
As for those, such as “thegreatresetter”, who regurgitate known
ideas, they can be neither right nor wrong, because they are parrots,
repeating someone else’s theses like a diligent pupil. It is not their first
time and they themselves need not be paid attention to.
WEALTH-MONARCHY-CLERGY SYMBIOSIS OF
THE NEW TOTALITARIANISM—When reading the above, a
legitimate question may arise—what happened to the expressed view
that it is the uber-wealthy who rule the world? Well, it may be observed
that sometimes there is restructuring of those at the top of the wealth-
pyramid, as the recent American history shows, while the immovable
monarchical centers of power remain intact for a long time. An
intermingling of representatives of this permanent monarchical power,
Vatican included, and the current super-rich cannot be denied—at least
we hear mentioned every day in the news their common baby, the
“great reset”, produced by these intermingled parties. Thus, instead of
what was said above to be observed as some pro-monarchical take on
today’s world governance, it rather reflects a symbiotic phenomenon—
in opposition to the uncertainty, dawning upon the oligarchy in the
East, at the mercy of changing status of the local quasi-dictator, the
Western permanent monarchical powers cannot survive without the
current super-wealthy and vice versa, the super-wealthy need the
permanency of the Western monarchical powers. The situation
resembles the aristocracy-bourgeois marriage described in di
Lampedusa’s “Il Gattopardo”. Therefore, a system which favors the
“great reset” flavor of totalitarianism, maintaining this symbiosis, is a
deadly threat for humanity as a whole, which is sensed by the peoples of
the world and resisted. Hence, the symbiotic entity in question fights
tooth and nail, even through blatantly causing an open distortion of the
2020 democratic election process, instilling crisis through faux-
pandemic in its latest activity, allowing outright unpunishable rigging
of elections—to prove election fraud in a crisis-distorted electoral
process is akin to bringing back into the tea-pot the steam that has

206
  Political Pivot of this Book 

already escaped through the kitchen window into the wide open air.
COLUMBUS’ DISCOVERY OF AMERICA AND THE
THEORY OF SLAVERY—Now, we will widen our ruminations
even further, conjecturing with regard to the motors which drove
structure-determining historical events. Empires have been fighting
since time immemorial for markets and sources of raw materials. This
leads to unexpected consequences.
Thus, one remains shocked realizing that the cause for the
discovery of America might have been the reaching of the Ottoman
Empire of Vienna, thus cutting off the trading routes of the European
empires to the East. European empires of the day had to look in other
directions, be it across the ocean, for expansion.
Lately, however, the world powers went even further than that.
We will jump ahead and say that the greatest discovery in the theory of
slavery was made in the nineteen seventies, when it was realized that it
was not necessary to territorially conquer the source of the raw
materials and settlements of the slaves, the producers of the goods, but
producing cheap and selling expensive could be done spatially
separated.
If the British Empire had been smarter and more far-sighted, it
would not have provoked a revolutionary war on the territory where the
United States is now, as a result of its attempt to conquer that territory,
but would have turned that domain (now known as the United States)
into an overseas territory with low-paid slaves to produce cheap goods
that slaveholders would realize in solvent markets controlled by the
Empire.
This mistake is corrected now by the territory which won its
independence from the British crown—the United States. It is exactly
what is happening now between the United States as the slave-driver
and China, as the territory of the slave-labor. Of course, the
homogeneous solvent market of the United States, the most efficient
market in the history of the world, cannot be compared to markets,
inferior in their efficiency, which the British Empire could have ensured
for the slave-produced goods, even given the British Empire’s

207
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

global character.
VELOCITY OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS—For
someone living in another country, there may be an image of America
created that everything is moving very fast, but for someone living in
New York, time feels as though it has stopped. Even the pedestrians are
taking their time, and the pace of work is as steady as it has always been.
So, one cannot find support for fast changes, even from that street-level
perspective. Motions here and there can be seen if they are paid for,
including protests and marches. Spontaneity is long gone. Even dissent
is commercialized. Thus, one may safely ignore all kinds of nuisance
mimicking social unrest. One, of course, can only guess whether or not
revolutionaries have always been paid to do the job. Conversely, I will
not exclude also the possibility that there have been idealists. Nowadays,
however, idealism, especially massively expressed, is highly unlikely,
judging from the ideology, rather, lack of any ideology whatsoever, that
would comprise any sensible leadership. Those who had aimed at
squandering efficient and genuine social dissent have won. Now,
dissent is only materialistically oriented and it will be directed solely by
the people with money, directing it in whatever direction they please,
the ordinary participants, drugged, distracted by shallow entertainment,
impoverished, having no say.
Fast-lane life is in the imagination of those, once again, driven
by greed. Fast turnover, fast delivery, take out, all these are consumptive
images of better profit-making practices, which is the relative of the
pure greed of a banker and is not a symbol of any change. This is the
essence of making money. The triviality of the foreseeable application
of the digital technologies create the false image of some urgency and
unusual change. A closer look, however, reveals that it is deceitful. The
height of cognitive occupation, the academic work, is slow, even very
slow—four centuries have past since the most important discovery of
Galileo; namely, that uniform translatory motion is akin to rest, and
that fact is still misunderstood even in academia. How fast is that
velocity—four centuries have passed and the idea of a special kind of
motion as being rest cannot sink in yet?
The worst muddling of an otherwise sober mind takes place
when psychology is imparted in rational discussions, pretending that it

208
  Political Pivot of this Book 

is a part of the rationality of these discussions. Also, to avoid confusion,

always rely on real, uncorrupted, free from absurdities, science.
Furthermore, the amazement caused by the idea of exponential growth
of the diseased due to an imagined pandemic, which so much puzzles
the economist or the sociologist, causing him to fall into stupor, is easily
healed by the absolutely objective data of the number of deaths from all
causes (cf. “PANIC BY THE POWER OF EXPONENTIAL
GROWTH”). Once these data are at hand, there is nothing to imagine
or be amazed at, for that matter. The absolute data is in front of you and
you may judge for yourself if there is anomaly. Indeed, the data show
unquestionably that in 41 states of the USA there was no anomaly
observed whatsoever (Fig.4). Where is the velocity of technological
progress in that, that would at all justify the inclusion of a link between
velocity of technological progress and purported cov-pandemic in a text
put forth by a “greatresetter”? If anything is to cause amazement, it is
why are there 12 states showing anomaly and that anomaly is not spread
out in the 41 states, given the intense travel between states during the
course of several months if the air-borne contagion of a disease is so
pronounced?
The overhaul of human cognition which occurred some four
hundred years ago, by the founding of the scientific method by Galileo,
is incomparable to the advancements due to all the technicalities labeled
as first, second, third, and the triviality which some label as fourth
technological revolution. In the same way, the mundane discovery and
occupation with binary arithmetic, sounding ridiculous during its time,
has a greater cognitive impact on humanity than the follow-up bustling,
visibly sped-up technological velocity of computer advancement, as was
already discussed when talking about binary arithmetic and boolean
algebra.
As for the industry, the variation of the natural vectors which
industry follows when left on its own, compared to when society gives
up on its deeper interest, in a slavery-dominated globalist world, are
obvious. The latter, the slavery-dominated world, is not at all a
prerequisite for technological progress. Quite the contrary—the slave
reproduces what the master has ordered. Neither is the immediacy or

209
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

the speed of exchange, a thing to be celebrated. What good does it do to

have fast exchange of low-quality goods?
POPULATION REDUCTION MANTRA—In this
connection, one may ruminate also on another mantra of globalism,
lately termed the “great reset”—global population reduction. It is the
opinion of this author that global population reduction is quite an
unjustified goal, to say nothing about its anti-human nature. What
needs to take place, contrary to the globalist’s goal, is to appreciate the
fact that every human being is a unique, highly developed cognitive
organism, capable of reasoning like nothing else in nature. Every human
is a concentrated center of cognition and reasoning like nothing else in
nature. Therefore, instead of enslaving the human being, reducing him
to an elementary slave of the limited scope of a repetitive producer of a
given product, by the methods of the globalist “great reset”, a system
must be worked out, which, on the contrary, will free all human beings
on Earth, so that they can unleash their creative abilities and potential,
beyond treating them as just working bees for doing mundane, low-
qualified jobs. The point is that humanity is not here to serve the needs
of a limited super-wealthy elite, but must solve problems which will
serve the entire humanity, without exception. It should go without
saying that such an utterly humanistic goal must be accomplished
neither through forward, nor through reverse racism. Not to even
mention that said humanistic goal must absolutely exclude all the rest of
the biological accents promoted by the modern Nazi ideology known as
post-modernism, widely sprawling its biological components to
incredible extent, putting to shame the old-fashioned narrow bound of
racism, which the original Nazis were preaching. Unbridled biologism,
presented as freeing of the individual, accomplishes exactly the opposite,
enslaving everyone by reducing his focus to the commonalities of every
biological organism, depriving the human being from what characterizes
him as such, making him different from all else biological in nature—
the cognitive and reasoning abilities of the human species. This problem
is of such importance that it deserves a special study, which we will
defer to future analyses and writings.

210
  Political Pivot of this Book 

GRADUAL PROCESS OF UNDERMINING

PRECEDES TODAY’S COLLAPSE—One may wonder how
humanity reached this point of intellectual collapse, symbolized at
present by the idea of “great reset”, almost at the point of no return.
The demise was “building” itself up gradually. If that was tried all at
once, it would have caused a shock and would have been rejected
outright. Gradual diversion differs from direct sabotage.
If one really needs to see where the roots of the moral and
conceptual demise of today are, one should look no further than the
destruction of science, which began at the dawn of the twentieth
century, with the incredible adoption as fantastic and unique science,
the mediocre absurdities of relativity, assisted by the anti-logical non-
science quantum mechanics. This is where all the demise of the world
began. The pathology of relativity is unmatched in the destructive
power it exerts on the intellect, compared to anything known prior to
it. This demonic demolition of the essence of humanity, its cognition,
sprawled out in society and obtained incredible further forms, not even
appearing as physics or as science any more.
Who could ever predict that early social utopias, which later
grew into acting doctrines, even in their aggression, would lead to the
organized hateful denialism of today, exclusively based on the biological
traits of humans? It is not even compensated in its external expression
by the predictable tribalism, leading in its extremes to the mirror image
of that hateful human biology-centric denialism.
This unrestrained human biology-centrism, winning over the
civilized word today, could not have been foretold even by extreme
conjectures exploiting the biological possibility for one of the biological
sexes to lose its role in procreation. It may be unthinkable today because
it has occurred to no one that one of the sexes has the potential to
procreate without the assistance of the opposite sex, but if it is
biologically feasible (as it appears, in principle, to be), it could be
realized one day, the way nuclear bomb arrived as a devastating
accompaniment to the peaceful utilization of the energy from the
splitting (or fusing) of the atom, or the way the peculiar binary
arithmetic, once mundane, now is threatening the integrity of the

211
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

world, as discussed earlier in this book.

LEVELS OF COMPLEXITY REDUCTION—The
complexity of the gradual process of intellectual deterioration, discussed
above, is a factor which prevents its clear discernment. Therefore, ways
to reduce this complexity must be sought. Some complex systems
may undergo reduction of complexity due to discoveries comprising
new findings or deeper analysis of known facts. Unfortunately,
not all complex systems are prone to such reduction, at least as of
today. For example, anthropogenic climate change claim has no such
complexity-reducing criterion. As eleven major world science
academies conclude, there will always be uncertainty in our
understanding of the world’s climate.
On the other hand, the catastrophic argument discovered by
this author, proving unequivocally that relativity is an absurdity, reduces
complexity infinitely.
There are intermediary cases, such as understanding the reality
of pandemics, whereby there is one absolute criterion, which bears a
definitive witness as to whether there has been a possible health anomaly
in a country. This definitive witness is the number of deaths from all
causes—week after week. Plotted as a graph, it will display a pattern
which unequivocally adjudicates the presence of an anomaly.
Therefore, pandemics cannot be given as an example of an issue
about which the politicians and decision-makers should feel entirely
befuddled, tying their hands from justifiably making well-grounded
decisions. At least, they can be absolutely clear about whether or not a
purported pandemic is real. They can see for themselves, without relying
on outside experts, whose real intentions are always questionable, if
what is being presented as epidemic or pandemic is really such—if they
do not see abnormalities in the mentioned graphs, then they must be
absolutely certain that there is nothing regarding the public health
policy to worry about. And they had better look at these data because in
many instances, the unnecessary lockdown which they impose on the
country may induce additional tragedies, which would not have
happened had there not been a lockdown—because of the instituted
panic and fear, really serious diseases may be left untreated

212
  Political Pivot of this Book 

and neglected. A lockdown in March may cause massive deaths in

November of such diseased people, with ailments having nothing to do
with the cause for the lockdown. This approach, ordering an unjustified
lockdown, borders on mass murder, if not genocide, but the politicians
are nonchalant about it.
As said, unlike the case of pandemics, where there are elements
about which one can vouch unequivocally, if one is to look for a really
complex issue, which has no prospects anytime soon to present
unequivocal proof one way or the other for a politician to personally
convince himself, leaving everything in the hands of outside experts
who are always corrupt, one should look no further than the claims for
anthropogenic climate change.
Furthermore, if certainty about a complex issue is sought by a
politician or a decision-maker to make not only informed, but
also absolutely categorical decisions about an issue of much
greater importance than pandemics or man-made climate change,
an issue systematically squandering billions of taxpayer dollars
on sheer absurdities, then such conscientious politicians and
decision-makers must not be shy to take a personal look at the
unequivocal proof this author has been presenting for over a
decade (cf. Addendum). Politicians and decision-makers don’t do
that. They don’t look into the unequivocal evidence that will not
only liberate humanity from a devastating financial burden, but
will save humanity from intellectual suppression and degradation.
The politicians rather prefer to pat each other on the back and
praise each other for telling cock-and-bull stories. They adopt directly
and unequivocally proven absurdities as some funny classical post-
Newtonian physics. On top of it, they build a non-existent quantum
world, a figment in the mind of corrupt elements claiming to be
scientists. In fact, they are outright charlatans, as clearly theoretically
proved by C. I. Noninski in 1964, as well as by my own theoretical
studies demonstrating that the very postulates of quantum mechanics
are non-scientific, and from the brilliant experimental studies of Yves
Couder, who in no uncertain terms demonstrated, in his lab at Paris
University Diderot, that the phenomena purportedly applicable to the

213
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

micro-world are manifest equally as well in the macro-world.

Feast of the charlatans, this is what is being praised today by the
leading politicians of the world. This does not only apply to
the President of Armenia, but more so to a former President of the
United States, who truly believes that the US Constitution is
characterized by some kind of space, which, on top of it, can be
curved because physics had said so. No, un-corrupted real physics has
never said so. However, the former President in question does not care
to look with his own eyes at the evidence, but only regurgitates what he
has heard from his science advisors, who are corrupt to the core.
Thus, if anything, the purported pandemic has revealed and
has alerted us about the above corrupt realities, hypocritically presented
as some great concern and care for the population.
POST WWII THINKING—THE FLOURISHING OF
COLLECTIVISM—The greatest world war in history was a clash
between two collectivist totalitarian systems. Instead of learning a
lesson, no sooner than the after-war destruction began to wane, the
Western intellectual thought returned aggressively back to the
principles of collectivism, which although advertised as the only
possible way for humanity to survive, through cooperation, in the long
run is always destructive of the true creativity. In the nineteen sixties,
the subversion of the social departments in academia by adopting a
unifying collectivistic term—paradigm (a pejorative term in the book of
every creative person)—was instrumental for founding of the ever
steadier ground of collectivism. These were the years when
pronouncing of absurdities as science began its rampant march in
academia, ravaging it to the core. In the modern world,
collectivism, hard to maintain otherwise, always tries to adapt
to the world through various modifications, nowadays putting
on the vest of post-modernism, an element of which is the proposed
“great reset”, subject of interest in this book. Of course, the different
variants of collectivism have features in common. As a rule,
collectivism as such, always targets private property, as does the “great
reset” today. Also, as a rule, anything collectivism proposes, is glazed
with the sweet talk that everything it does is for your own good.

214
  Political Pivot of this Book 

Thus, all the questions the collectivist, who in our case we call
“thegreatresetter”, asks, are always hypocritically enunciated to be in the
direction of serving the collective, but at the end of the day, are actually
serving those several hyper-wealthy elite individuals often mentioned in
this book. This most of all applies to progress—what does progress
comprise to “thegreatresetter”? The expected answer is predetermined
—according to “thegreatresetter”, one can only speak of progress if it
is “inclusive” and “sustainable”. Ultimately, that means—it is progress if
it only serves the totalitarian control of society, cementing forever
the governance and privilege of the elite through making everyone
outside of that elite homogeneous. More on homogenization of
society is said elsewhere in this book.
Upon superficial reading of “thegreatresetter’s” texts, the
answer containing the words “inclusive” and “sustainable” may not
sound disagreeable. Who would not like to be respected and to be
considered equally as important as anyone else, which is what
“inclusivity” seems to mean?
However, one fundamental question appears when hearing the
sweet talk of “inclusivity”. Being as equally important as everyone is,
how are the discoveries by some individuals, discoveries which on top of
it pertain to the entire population, to be made heard and stand out in
the homogeneous choir of everyone else’s “equally important” chatter?
Do these discoveries overwhelmingly pertain only to the
particular individual taking part in the multitudinous discourse
of “equally important” utterings? Besides, why should we be
listening to what “thegreatresetter” says, rather than listening to the
almost eight billion equally as important sayings?
How is the topic of this book, which is a topic of importance
for the entire society—restoration of truth—to be distinguished from
everyone else’s self-centered and “equally important” talk?
Because, notably, for someone who cares to restore truth and bring
back science from its current state of absurdity to the state of reason and
logic, to be given an equal chance in the distribution of societal wealth,
is not on his “wish list”, especially when he espouses valid ideas but is
thrown into the trap of the collective, who will mercilessly maul his

215
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

ideas. How is one to make his correct idea heard against the vicious
actions of the collective, determinately protecting the old but wrong
idea?
If I had the choice, I would gladly cede my right for equal
participation in the redistribution of the public wealth, if the
government gives priority, through the laws it establishes, to ideas which
benefit the entire society and does not treat these ideas as equally
important as the ideas concerning only a given individual, especially not
when these governmentally-supported ideas benefit some magnum-
wealthy and powerful elite. Alas, there is no such provision in the “great
reset” and there could not be, because the goals of the “great reset” are
diametrically opposite to such kind of sharing, a sharing dissipative to
the self-segregating, centralizing goals of the elite. Conversely, all that
this so-called “great reset” cares about, when it comes to the multitude
of the outsiders, is how to use governmental intervention to take money
from the companies and very selectively redistribute that money to the
community, aiming at imposing of totalitarian control—how exactly,
will be discussed shortly. All this “great reset” cares about, when it comes
to the crowd outside of the elite circles, is to have companies make
money, not only for its owners and shareholders, but also for everyone
else in the neighborhood, who not only has nothing to do with the
company, but has not even heard that such a company exists.
Remember, everyone is equally as important as everyone else, and in the
long run, those who own more should be made to share it with the rest
of the community by also placing every individual under directing
totalitarian control, and everyone becomes equally as poor but “happy”.
Noticeably, this kind of happiness does not apply to the elite, who are
doomed, under the “great reset”, to stay super-unhappy, basking in their
wealth and power, exerting totalitarian control on everyone else.
Objectionable elements exist also in the “sustainability” part of
the proposal, especially its coercive character, giving a permit into the
hands of the government, which can be prone to a myriad of abuses.
Notwithstanding is the obvious disadvantage under which such
“sustainability” elements puts the Western companies, weakening the
Western companies in their competition with China. The latter, despite

216
  Political Pivot of this Book 

its totalitarian character, does not impose “sustainability” or “inclusivity”

restrictions for its companies, which automatically provides it a
competitive edge in the world economic confrontation. Therefore, those
who dream of central imposition of similar restriction on the companies
in the West, act as if they aim at deliberate destruction of the Western
economy in favor of the economy of China, acting as China’s agents,
while still playing the unidirectional slavery-game, mentioned in other
parts of this book.
The call of “thegreatresetter” to have the world leaders place
greater emphasis on the welfare of all citizens and the planet, is a perilous
naïveté, which is unbecoming for a serious geopolitical strategist. In such
global context as the one we live in now, the proposed updating of the
concept of GDP, to include not only production and consumption, but
also considering the depletion of resources, as well as factors such as the
digital economy revenue, contribution of the precariat workers, and
value of the destruction caused by economic activity, is also unrealistic—
the West has economic counterparts which have no intention of
implementing such corrected definitions, but are instead staunchly
practicing the good old capitalism. Therefore, such proposal puts at a
clear disadvantage the western companies. How about the proposal that
the household-created value is not taken into consideration? It is,
however. Companies allowing work from home account for that. Then,
what is the reason for such an empty proposal? Well, it is the fear that it
could be beyond the control of the government. However, being beyond
the control of the government does not at all justify deeper intervention
into the inner sanctum of the individuals. Once such steps of
intervention depth are allowed, the sky is the limit for the government.
This unbridled governmental intervention into the lives of the
individuals surpasses many times over the already historically tried
totalitarian models, all of which ended in failure. The current Chinese
totalitarian model appears to work so far because it is supported by the
West as the slave-labor territory. Left on its own, the West withdrawn
from China, the Chinese totalitarian model will collapse in no time.
Furthermore, it is a hopeless task to curb the gap between measured and
actual work in the digital world—the genie is out of the bottle. The

217
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

steam of the locomotive cannot be brought back into the steam-engine.

Let alone have the shifting or destroying of value in digital finance,
appear as creating value—a hopeless shadow-chasing to pursue. New
real ideas, not destructive ideas such as the “great reset”, are needed to
harness this feast of trivialities. Also, it should be obvious that GDP per
capita is never a good detailed indicator of the quality of life, even if the
income inequality is not growing and that can be guessed even without
the introduction of the “great reset”. How should the quality of
life be improved without turning everyone into a zombie of the state, is
a real problem, and it needs serious research and bright ideas, not
the first thing that comes to mind, because that is easy.
One thing is clear, problems of capitalism are not in the verbal
definition of the categories that characterize it. Just changing the
definitions but leaving capitalism itself in effect, will not cure
capitalism’s ills but will appear more like an ostrich hiding its head in
the sand. Neither can the effect of capitalism’s sharpest edges be
mitigated by burdening it with additional social loads, to the extent of
crushing it. If someone wants reforms, wishful thinking will not do the
job, neither crude “Columbus’ egg” sort of solutions.
Of course, in view of the topic of interest in this book, the
above was an unnecessary distraction into some elements of economics
theory. Moreover, no economic theory will help in understanding the
issue at hand, firstly, because economics is only contingently called
science, its theories inherently incapable of systematically predicting
future phenomena, dealing only with the aftermath.
The economic analysis is usually very limited and it can fully
overlook and admit fascist tendencies—when the economy provides the
central criterion of societal welfare, if a political arrangement is good for
the economy, then it is deemed acceptable without much ado,
regardless of other nuances involving democracy and freedom.
Secondly, the social and economic processes are shaped by
policies, which, as already said, are, at the end of the day, dreamed up by
a few unelected and unqualified private individuals just because they are
controlling exclusive fortunes, not because they themselves or the
advising servants they hire to write analyses and reports for them, are the

218
  Political Pivot of this Book 

sharpest knives in the kitchen. As a matter of fact, not only is the elite
unelected and for the most part incompetent, but it and its minions
have not been known to have made any discovery or any positive
contribution to the repository of human knowledge that would serve all
humanity. All that comes out of their activity are new ideas of
suppression and negative contributions, such as contributions to the
theory of slavery, accommodating only that very limited elite.
As far as a candidate-sycophant goes, knowing that he should
say things or act in a certain way, in order to please the master-elite, and
thus get ahead, in the earlier days when the elite was still insecure,
always facing upheaval from the multitude, and therefore was carefully
hiding its intentions, the candidate-sycophant knew well that most of
the time trying to guess what the elite expects you to say, or how the
elite expects you to act, is a mostly futile pursuit. Today, the elite has
become so self-assured that it not only reveals some general trends in its
actions in defense of its interest and continuous stay in power, while its
intentions are becoming more and more delineated, but this elite is not
afraid any more to state its intentions, even openly, through loyal
“greatresetter” puppets. Therefore, to become a lackey of the elite is
now not a matter of having a special talent to be an obedient sycophant,
able to discern the slightest innuendos and hints of the master, so that
you would be chosen, in competition with other sycophants. It is now
becoming a common matter because the elite already quite openly states
what it really needs to hear from a servant, and servitude is becoming
available for grabs out in the open, and more and more opportunists
take advantage of it. One need only listen, if he has time to waste, to the
executives of various world organizations, in order to have the talking
points of the elite laid out bare in front of him. Thus, the situation is
brought to a stand still—even if the commoner objects, what is he going
to do?
CHINA HAS NO ALTERNATIVE IDEOLOGY—The
market-based capitalism of the USA, as a super-power, was imposed on
the world, and especially on the other world powers, not vice versa.
Therefore, it is out of the question that anyone has any alternative

219
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

ideology to impose back on the United States. This spreading of the US

system outwardly puts everyone else in a subordinate position. There
may be seeming resistance by some regimes, but in their essence, they
are subjugated by their more powerful neighbor. Therefore, it is not a
question of nearing positions between equipollent super powers, but is
a fight between the Frankenstein which the superpower, the USA, itself
created, the student surpassing his teacher, and now the battle has
become the classical battle between two beasts for markets and
expansion, the teacher most likely exposing its real essence as the “paper
tiger” (cf. “PAPER TIGER”) in this fight. The paper-pandemic only
advanced the interests of the newly-minted beast in this classical thriller
of the clash of the giants. These two forces, the teacher and the student,
have never been in any relation other than vicious rivalry. However,
now, the student, already more muscular, appears as the real challenger
of his aging master, the former, still unable to shake off its back the
slavery burden, imposed by special design by the master-slavedriver.
That special design was the whole purpose of the exercise started by
Nixon with respect to China. Some now use the term “decoupling” in
the hope that these two giants, intertwined into each other, can be
pulled apart. This is impossible without breaking the whole
international system of relations, the way it is impossible to separate the
millions of tentacles ingrown into a body, turning this entanglement
into an indelible whole. Try to separate them and you will kill the
organism. It will not be broken into two separately living parts but both
parts of the entire organism will not survive alone. All this is headed to
the good old conflicts with which history is richly overrun. Triviality of
such conflict provides no interesting aspects for analysis. Same old,
same old. Old as the world situations, for which no criteria of absolute
truth can be applied, because there is no cognitive value or achievement
in such a rudimentary clash. It is like trying to rationalize a natural
disaster. The only hope is that the more somber side, the teacher, will
turn out to be the stronger and would unilaterally put a stop to the
conflict by flexing his muscles. To distract the analysis of this problem,
built-up due to a plethora of major historical factors, the main factor
being the newly found opportunity to benefit from a new type of

220
  Political Pivot of this Book 

slavery on the part of the dominating world power, by ruminations on

the role of a virus, is to diminish the level of conversation.
THE USA HURT ITSELF—The United States hurt its own
self because the mass-media, which created the world hysteria,
purportedly caused by cov-pandemic, is American. No other country in
the world has a collective media empire having such an unquestionable
world impact. Therefore, if anything hurt America by this rampage of
fearmongering, it was America itself. Thus, as far as losers and
winners are concerned, there are no different scenarios and answers—
the only loser in this self-imposed delirium is singlehandedly the USA.
As they say, no one can do worse to you than you yourself. Some
influential parties within the United States themselves, are ready, in
their vice and envy, to have the United States demolished rather than
not see their political way win. There is no other way to characterize
these disastrous actions, other than high treason, even if this slowing
down, impoverishing everyone and de-industrialization, is according to
the plans of the “great reset” for the establishment of totalitarian rule by
the elite, allowing swaying of the country in the direction the elite
wants. As said, China, having its own brand of totalitarianism, will not
go along, and the “great reset” of the United States results only in giving
China additional competitive edge.
THE PAPER TIGER—We don’t need Chairman Mao to tell
us that a country relying only on business, in order to be great, is a
“paper tiger” for China. Business is a numbers game and it is always for
the more multitudinous nation to overcome the less numerous one,
when it comes to business. It was either for Nixon to refrain China
from opening, which would be impossible in view of the development
of technology and the respective pressure from the leading USA
corporations for expansion into the territories of cheap labor, as already
explained, or sit down and rethink the priorities; that is, is it really only
business that makes a country great. This rethinking and refocusing
priorities from the monochrome business orientation, is what really
makes an advanced civilization stronger.
The 45th President of the United States didn’t realize that more
needs to be done than playing with tariffs and protectionism, because

221
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

business has no patriotic bone, neither has it whatever moral restraints,

and will always prefer slave labor, outflowing to places where it can pay
ten times less salary than in America, just like water which will never go
uphill spontaneously. The forces opposing the 45th President of the
United States have always preferred slave labor, since the times when
they imported slaves from Africa, later, finding that it was not enough,
and all should become slaves, which was accomplished through a civil
war, until the conditions became right for setting up remote slaves in
much greater number and getting much lower pay than even the New
York panhandler can imagine. At that, in addition to keeping clean
from the pollution of industry, the territory of the largest and the most
homogeneous and efficient market history has ever known, they can
turn goods that cost them close to nothing into goods earning them
tens, hundreds, thousands, more. There is no President, even if he is
God, who can stand in the way of such an avalanche. It is true that, in
the end, this avalanche will engulf the party which set it off—in this
case the interests of the big businesses in the USA, in need of realizing
maximally goods produced cheaply elsewhere—on top of it ensuring
that de-industrialization of the territory with the most solvent market,
the USA, would thus spare itself overproduction, respectively,
overconsumption, and would stay environmentally clean. Such policy is
ruinous for the country. However, the big businesses running the USA
don’t care. Didn’t we say that business’s avarice has no bounds and
there are no moral, ethical or even common sense grounds that could
shun its infinite greed, the only boring feeling it entertains.
POLITICAL LEFT AND RIGHT IS A RUSE—In this
atmosphere of global slavery, the local division into political left and
political right loses its identity because every political tendency is
inconvenient to the global slave-driver, and can be squandered or
bought out. When there are enough finances, even the staunchest
adherent to one political tendency, except for an insignificant
principled minority of little or no impact, can be purchased to change
sides. As the freshest example, this was demonstrated during the last
elections. When politics forgets its principles, replacing them with the
commanding principles of a super-wealthy elite, division into left and

222
  Political Pivot of this Book 

right loses its ground and becomes superfluous.

Actually, under the conditions we are living in now, the left
and the right, politically speaking, are converted into the division
between those who are against global slavery and those who support the
global slave-drivers. From the narrow perspective of the individual, it
may seem that he has a choice to adhere to a more socially oriented
political left, vying for redistribution through increase of taxation and a
greater involvement of the government, as opposed to leaning towards
the opposite, which in the old classification, would be labeled
political right, espousing less government, lower taxes, unassailed
market and primacy of profit for the shareholders, all of it known as
“laissez-faire capitalism”. However, both these political trends are now
being absorbed into the clash between global players, whereby the
winning of one of those global political players—the globalists, a.k.a.
“thegreatresetters”—would mean engulfing both left and right into one
single stupefied mixture, dominated by a super-powerful elite. This
dominance has the deceitful seemingness of political left, with its free
supply of “helicopter” money for everyone, but, as said, that digital
money for everyone differs from the Universal Basic Income (UBI),
which retains the principle of privacy. While under UBI everyone is
given a certain amount of money which he can spend unaccountably
for whatever one pleases, under the new ubiquitous elite-controlled
regime, citizenry cedes its privacy for the purposes of social ranking,
which would direct not only the amounts the individual receives, but
also the overall standing of the individual commoner in society. This is
explained more thoroughly in other parts of the book. Here it will be
mentioned that not only is a person of lower social ranking eligible for
less monetary support, but he will be denied certain positions in the
hierarchy of society, in the job market, in the governance of society. He
will be denied access to goods and services and those too much opposed
to obeying the elites, especially their unification and homogenization
agenda, will be denied even the right to live. That control is not
personified by a living person, be it a dictator or a monarch, but is
impassionately and impersonally established from the surveillance data
gathered from everyone belonging to the multitude, left or right. The

223
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

distinction is between politically correct and politically incorrect

(politically correct is the individual acting in the direction of societal
homogeneity discussed below), and that distinction acts inherently, due
to the behavior of everyone. The citizenry allowing this kind of control
which is self-inflicted, automatically and facelessly swaying every single
individual in the direction a master elite group has decided (namely,
toward societal homogeneity), will sign its own ticket to oblivion. This
kind of ubiquitous slavery has not even been in the dreams of the
traditional slavery advocates. It not only smears the distinction between
left and right, but deforms the struggle for every aspect of human
rights—the very activists in such struggle being used by the said elites to
unwittingly fight for the establishment of this new order, in fact,
harming the very core of their own struggle for social justice.
If the above idea for universal slavery is labeled a modern,
quasi-progressivist, way of reshaping the world, the other idea, rejecting
slavery, respecting privacy and a natural evolution, would be the old-
fashioned way of the world going about its business.
Now, the above mean collectivist phenomenon does not
tolerate labels such as left or right, because the process of decay coalesces
in the higher spheres of knowledge both on the left and on the right.
Such left-right contrasts are only a mind-creation of a small elite who
has an interest in a confused world, a world acting as a herd, as a
collective that obediently listens and follows the leader. Fascism is the
ideal—today achieved in its greatest version ever, in China, in the form
of Mussolini’s revived idea of the corporate single-party state.
Therefore, the struggle is not between the left and the right. The real
struggle is the struggle between the sensible and the absurd. In
politics, this struggle is translated into the struggle between freedom
and slavery. The real struggle is the struggle against the triumph of
absurdity over the truth, but not the “truth” that only seems to us to be
true, but the truth established by the methods of science. Restoring real
science is the only sensible goal of humanity.
THE PRESIDENT—A ROMANTIC HERO,
LIBERATOR FROM THE “GREAT RESET” POST-
INDUSTRIAL SLAVERY—If we separate the 45th President as a

224
  Political Pivot of this Book 

personality—naïvely inexperienced in the Machiavellian ways of

politics, surrounding himself, for lack of natural friends, by cronies,
accidental people and outright traitors—from the ideas which he
espouses, we cannot but see him as the liberator from slavery.
This kind of talk bears the obvious risk, under the current
slavery-favoring regime, of being labeled as reactionary. However, those
who like to label people will always be around, they will always be
superficial, and their labeling, which they use as an argument against an
opponent they don’t like, will never hold water.
CORPORATE IDEOLOGY OF THE PRESIDENT—The
President in question has no contiguous ideology other than the
plainness of observing the United States as a corporation and running it
as such. This is a big deficiency, considering the immense complexity of
the world. The romanticism of a liberator from slavery cannot be
arriving from the corporate culture he comes from, but must have
evolved as a by-product of his observation of the goings-on in that
culture. The upbringing and the personal abilities surely have played a
role, but second-guessing on that matter, although maybe a pleasant
past-time, isn’t worth the while. What is important in the end, when the
dust settles, is the overall feeling of an almost inhuman heroism in the
unequal battle against the greedy beast of slavery.
ALTERNATIVE FACTS AND THE WAR FOR
TRUTH—The real war humanity wages is the war for the real truth.
This war has been ongoing for centuries, but today it is aggravated by
the enhanced information exchange, so new tools are invented by those
who are determined to suppress truth. They are the ones who have
invented the label “conspiracy theorist” anytime they need to suppress
any voice which does not repeat their lies. You are not a “conspiracy
theorist” if you go along with their lies. When it comes to the
government, the liar can always escape scrutiny, claiming that he is only
maintaining institutional stability, while the truth issues are handled by
the politicians, who are known to lie anyway.
How can any media pretend to be the stalwart of truth,
accusing anyone of lying, pretending that fact-checking has confirmed

225
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

it, when it is praising as genius science something which can

immediately, directly be confirmed to be absurdity? There is no fact-
checking which can compare in accuracy with the unequivocal evidence
that relativity and progeny are absurd (cf. Addendum). The ignoring of
that very fact by the media, lying through their teeth that relativity is the
summit of human thought, proves that if one accuses politicians of
being professional liars, the media is the really confirmed bunch of liars.
This media deception, however, cannot be exposed because the media
itself is financed to uphold the lie. The cover-up of the deception
is aided by uncountable finances, which cannot be overcome with
reasonable arguments. Overwhelming finances are more powerful than
a thousand cannons when aimed at smashing the unprotected, idealistic
body of truth.
ALTERNATIVE FACTS IN POLITICS—Heavily
financed manipulations through the media, used to massage truth,
are used also in practical politics. The media, paid to lie, cannot
be corrected by mere arguments. On the contrary, the media, paid to
lie, receives the highest societal acclaim.
An example of such manipulation is when people attending a
rally are counted at two different times. The number of people present
at an earlier hour, when the rally has not yet begun, is manipulatively
presented, accompanied by a picture of those present, as if that is the
number of people attending the rally itself, which takes place later.
Therefore, when it comes to the rally, the alternative fact, the truthful
fact; that is, the number of people present then, at the very moment of
the rally, is the correct, pertinent fact referring to the rally of interest.
The number of people earlier is a fact, the number of people present
later, at the rally itself, is also a fact, an alternative fact. In such a case,
the alternative fact should not be used as a pejorative, as media dastardly
does, but should be taken as the genuine fact, truly corresponding to the
phenomenon at hand, defying what manipulators had earlier falsely
presented as the fact pertaining to the rally in effect.
To present that established facts can be changed is the same
thing as falling into the same above-described activity of a manipulator.
The sad political irony is that the manipulator, forging the 9 o’clock

226
  Political Pivot of this Book 

picture of the rally site as the 12 o’clock picture, accuses the other party,
the truthful, non-manipulating party, of manipulation—“the thief
hollering, catch the thief”.
SUBTLE THREAT AIMED AT THE GOVERNMENT
IN POWER—Once in a while “thegreatresetter” puts his cards on the
table and shows his real colors. This will be noted in another instance in
this book, commenting on global governance (cf.
“THEGREATRESETTER” SPITS THE PEBBLE). Amongst the
wordiness, what “thegreatresetter” really upholds, is what passes in the
United States as radical leftist views, espousing massive redistribution
through rejecting neoliberalism. This comprises increase of the
government control and redefinition of social contract under pressures
coming from social unrest. Accidentally, make no mistake—ultimately,
no matter how sweetly leftist “thegreatresetter” sounds, he is the
sycophant of the super-wealthy elite, who cannot be politically left in a
classical sense by any stretch of the imagination.
One again wonders, as in other parts of the book, how does
“thegreatresetter” know what will happen? It could be that he is telling
us what will happen by design. Otherwise, it is nothing other than free
speculation from baseless considerations. “Thegreatresetter” was writing
in the summer of 2020 and there was an organized social unrest to unseat
the incumbent President. Come another President, organizing social
unrest will be no longer necessary, so the purported factor that should
have led to rewriting the social contract will be gone, if one follows
“thegreatresetter’s” logic. That logic goes against what “thegreatresetter”
said before; namely, that this specific crisis, the cov-crisis, will cause
unheard-of “great reset”, bringing forth policies opposing the policies of
the incumbent President. Therefore, it is exactly the replacement-
President, who will implement the anti-neoliberal policies to the liking of
those who would otherwise organize the social unrest. Ergo, the
conjecture that the new social contract will be rewritten in the post cov-
crisis period under the pressure of social unrest, is untenable under the
new President. Thus, one may take the text written by “thegreatresetter”
as a subtle threat directed at the incumbent President in the Summer of
2020, that if he is re-elected, there will be a new social contract no matter

227
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

what, or else social unrest is inevitable.

POST-MODERNISM—REFINED VARIANT OF THE
OLD BIOLOGICALLY—BASED IDEOLOGIES—There are
analyses, which are repetitions of the well-known theses on some
elements of neo-Nazism, referred to today as post-modernism. Authors
call these elements neo-Marxism, which can be accepted only
conditionally, in order to organize, around a contingent center, the
abominations of Marxism, but in fact, post-modernism and Marxism
have nothing in common conceptually, not that Marxism is not
defunct, but due to other reasons, beyond the topics of discussion in
this book, because post-modernist’s ultimate goal is not explicitly
defined, although both post-modernism and Marxism, at the end of the
day, serve the interests of the elite. Unfortunately, what is described in
these analyses are the symptoms, not the roots of the phenomenon. Not
to mention that there is a completely unfounded emphasis on the
writings of someone, proposing asymmetry in tolerance, skewing it
towards one side of the political spectrum, a political spectrum which
under the “great reset” is smeared to oblivion anyway. Reading the essay
proposing said asymmetry immediately disposes of any idea that it
could be a manifesto of anything. Such nonsense as the nonsense
cooked in that essay, an attempt at a verbal salad of pseudo-Hegelian
and quasi-Kantian misunderstood chatter, sprinkled with completely
unfounded terminology, which the author of the salad himself does not
understand, can only serve as a “manifesto” if used by people who do
not read, but need an excuse to wave something, a flag, to display their
frustrations from anything at all, and look for a vent.
Purely dialectically, it is fortunate that incompetence of that
kind of skewed-tolerance variety, is the manifesto of the mediocre,
irresponsible and lazy, because the incompetent is doomed, it has no
future in itself, without anyone moving a finger to fight it. That is why
it needs no attention. Not to mention that authors of such essays
generously steal ideas from Antonio Gramsci’s prison notes, which, at
least, make some sense, no matter how critical of them one might be.
But where did this societal scourge, which floods us like a
torrent today, come from in practical terms, knowing that its real

228
  Political Pivot of this Book 

theoretical start is laid with the destruction of physics at the turn of the
century, around 1900? This untouchable, almost monarchically
protected territory of destroyed physics, which no one dares to
question, is viciously seeping its venom into society under the deceptive
guise of high revolutionary science. In this way, aside from being
destructive to science, it has been undermining society at large for
decades—science is the ultimate arbiter for correct thinking and when
science is destroyed, then thinking is destroyed too as a result. If, now
society, entrapped in such destroyed thinking, becomes collectivistic,
that is a sure sign for disaster—as part of a collective, everyone obeys the
adopted collectivistic doctrine, pejoratively called paradigm, the result
of that destroyed thinking. The flawed thinking of society, induced by
the destroyed science, really began to be manifested societally in the
nineteen sixties by a group in academia, specifically determined to revive
academically the principles of collectivism in science, collectivism which
led to WWI and WWII, the great war in two parts, but which
collectivism the world began to shake itself from, after the end of that
world war. These academics were the elements who founded something
denoted by the oxymoron “philosophy of science”. It is an oxymoron
because it is science which came to the rescue of the ontology and
epistemology enslaved by philosophy, which enslavement was
disallowing the human mind to escape its own prison and to connect
itself truthfully to the real world. Therefore, “philosophy” cannot
modify “science” as a part of a common term. In this connection, it may
be worth noting that Galileo, as the founder of science, has much
greater significance for humanity than we usually realize. Thus, Galileo
is the liberator from the prison of philosophy by providing a direct
connection to the actual reality of nature.
The trick employed by these so-called “science philosophers”
was not only to influence an incomparably larger audience (larger
because the subjects it is exposed to are easier—there are no formulae,
for example) in some fictional so-called social sciences—rather than to
influence the limited audience of the difficult exact sciences. The goal
was to brainwash society into something far more effective in its
subversiveness. Before I go into a description of the latter, let me just

229
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

mention—it is no coincidence that the degradation to collectivism was

directed at the easier, therefore more numerous so-called social sciences
crowd, because they are the pool that flows into society, appointed by
the elite to convey its will through what is known as governing society.
In contrast, the graduates of exact sciences do not have the knack of
going into politics and mind their own business.
Thus, this pool of social sciences supplies society with its future
leaders. Many of them, finding themselves in universities such as Boston
University or Harvard, albeit through affirmative action, eagerly
absorbed the indoctrination, as befits any sycophant. Affirmative action
is acknowledging that you are more qualified if your biological traits are
acceptable, never mind your academic aptitude. Needless to say, those
already in power (the acquisition of which is helped by natural
biological demographic restructuring) will forge laws and pull the
handlebars in accordance with the indoctrination they have received
from its broken departments, dotted with false social specialties.
DEVASTATING EFFECT OF INFUSING
PHILOSOPHY IN SCIENCE—What is it that undermined the
academy and created prerequisites for the incredible intellectual
abominations to become mainstream? The pivotal thing that came out
during the “sixties” of the last century was the inappropriate frantic
stitching to the essence of science, of the incompatible field known as
philosophy. Thus, a teleological oxymoron, known as the “philosophy
of science” was created.
In contrast, real science, not the absurd science of today, is the
highest cognitive human activity. It is characterized by the fact that it
retains only the truths (in the form of scientific knowledge) that it has
reached, dooming to oblivion the delusions it inevitably had to go
through during its development. Philosophy, on the other hand, allows
views to sit together at the table of human thinking, equally legitimate,
without definitively judging which view is wrong and which view is
right. Anyone who has listened to philosophy lectures may not have
failed to notice that instead of philosophy, what is being taught is
history of philosophy. Quite the reverse, the lectures in physics or
chemistry are not lectures on the history of these sciences. If you want

230
  Political Pivot of this Book 

to hear a history of science lecture, there are separate marginal such

lectures. The lectures of physics and chemistry talk only about the
winners in the historical battle of ideas in these disciplines.
Unfortunately, as repeatedly mentioned, especially in physics, the
“winning ideas” include the absurdities imposed by the twentieth-
century physics as science.
The described internally controversial hybrid “philosophy of
science” was not introduced by accident. “Philosophy of science”
emancipates the exact sciences from the notion that truth is real, and
presents itself as if the rule applies also to the exact sciences that all that is
considered truth is a matter of perspective, that “anything goes” also in
science, which, translated, means that there is no truth, that the truth is
only interpretation, invention, or, at most, a metaphor. The destruction
of the understanding that truth is real, not just some fiction, lies at the
very center of any further intellectual outrage and its easy dissemination
in society we are observing today.
Of course, only mere declarations for the destruction of the
concept of truth would not have been sufficient, if the producer and
bearer of truth—science—had not been defeated. The world cannot be
turned into a collective kennel, as is the goal of the elite, a collective
kennel whose gauleiters legislate what is and what is not, if at the same
time, some “selfish” intellectual elite (to be distinguished from the non-
intellectual super-wealthy elite) is allowed to exist, recognizing that there
is truth, thus undermining collectivism and its truth-neutral guiding
concept known as paradigm. The defeat of science was served on a
platter by the destroyed physics, known as the twentieth-century physics.
As pointed out, destruction of physics commenced in the early nineteen
hundreds, based on absurdities, but still in a narrow circle then. It was
necessary to give public importance to that destruction, and the dirty
work was done by the introduction of the impossible “philosophy of
science” of the nineteen sixties, which linked, as a conduit, the destroyed
science of academia with society at large.
The devastating two-part world war during the twentieth
century, sparked by the vicious clash of two collectivist doctrines,
brought pogrom to the world. After the war’s ending, the material

231
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

destruction, the infrastructure, everything was visibly quickly restored,

and it seemed as if there were no more memorial of it. Moral and
intellectual ruin, however, remained. The restored infrastructure turned
out to be a wonderful shell, in which the parasitizing desert-crab of the
absurd physics of the twentieth century settled in, generously pampered
by academia as the so-called “philosophy of science”.
The really astonishing thing is that no matter what meanders of
confusion and difficulties science went through from Galileo on, until
the end of the nineteenth century, at least those most fundamental
notions, time and space, the basis of human cognition, were never
maimed, as was really viciously done during the continuing demise of
science that started at the turn of the last century. Even philosophy,
with its sometimes conflicting schools, never allowed itself to mess
around with time and space. As noted above, infiltrating philosophy
into science during the nineteen sixties was a tragic, very destructive
event. The paradox about philosophy’s imposition on science is that, on
the one hand, philosophy itself correctly did not mess around with time
and space, but always recognized their absolute nature—no
philosophical school prior to the appearance of the botched physics
ever falsely claimed that time may proceed at a different rate depending
on the coordinate system or that the physical space can be curved. At
the same time, incorrectly messing around with science, philosophy
widely opened up the door for the invasion of irrationality by
undermining the reality of the central tenet of science—truth.
ANOTHER TRICK—PRESENTING TECHNOLOGY
AS SCIENCE—There is another trick which aids this game of
deception; namely, the conditioning of society that technology is
science. In this way, the numerous indisputable technological
achievements are presented as achievements of science; at that,
especially lying that they are achievements of the absurd science which
the corrupt so-called experts ask billions of dollars for. A drastic
example in this respect is the lie that the technological achievement,
indeed based on a scientific discovery—nuclear fission—the atomic
bomb, was possible due to relativity, which has derived what

232
  Political Pivot of this Book 

has been promoted for society’s consumption, as the greatest formula of

all time, the mass-energy relation E = mc2. Ergo, the manipulation
goes, if anything deserves billions of dollars in funding, it is this kind of
science—there can be no other science anywhere near more deserving
to have billions of dollars spent, than relativity and progeny,
which purportedly has given rise to the unsurpassed way of producing
energy, as well as the deadliest weapon of all time. The immediate
unequivocal truth, however, is that relativity has nothing to do with
E = mc2, least of all deriving it, because relativity is absurdity, incapable
of deriving anything whatsoever. E = mc2 is derived classically.
Technology develops independently of science, occasionally
utilizing a scientific finding, as is the case with nuclear fission and
fusion, as a limited part of its overall non-scientific activity. Science, on
the other hand, has no teleological goals whatsoever, and it is not
developing to supply technology with new ideas. The only goal of
science is knowledge itself, without even a thought how this knowledge
will be used for practical purposes. Technology, on the other hand, has
entirely pragmatic focus. It is the basis of goods-producing companies
and is a money-earner. Real science is only a money-spender, and the
greatest supplier of the money for science to spend is the government.
No private source of financing can compete with the government as a
supplier of funds for science. This is the reason why manipulators stick
like leeches to the politicians, who hold the keys to the public coffers.
Having politician’s ear, these charlatans desperately contort the picture
of who contributes to the public wealth and who spends it, making it
appear that the amazing visible achievements of producer technology
are deceitfully presented as achievements of the spender; i.e., science. In
addition, taking advantage of the deceptive promotion of relativity and
progeny as the greatest science there is, the government is manipulated
into thinking that public money allocated for science must be
concentrated on this most promising topic, rather than be spread too
thin on anything else. The adage goes, it is better to concentrate all the
funding on the research which holds the greatest promises for even
greater discoveries, than on any other science, which holds much lesser
promises. Once the governmental wheel begins turning in this

233
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

devastating direction, there is no force on Earth that can stop it. The
monumental administrative machine of the deep state is notorious for
its unbending once it appropriates a direction of development. On
the surface of the deep state, governments come and go, but, when it
comes to science, its core, formed around the lie of the century that
relativity derives E = mc2, remains undisturbed, destroying the
nation as time goes by.
The politician or the decision-maker is not privy to this
subtlety distinguishing technology from science, additionally electrified
by the corrupt beneficiaries of the funds the politician will disburse. A
symbiotic, rather synergic, relationship is created between the charlatan
and the politician. The nation experiences the result, albeit still failing
to see it—science, substituted by absurdities, resulting in society being
in the grip of charlatans.
IRON GRIP OF ABSURDITIES—So, now, in the middle
of this intellectual mess, comprising a really deep crisis in the upper
floors of human cognition, we have more than one leader of the world,
standing mixed up, incapable of judging what is really to be amazed at
and what is a logical foreseeable product of innovative engineering.
Therefore, one singularly important task stands in front of
every qualified but uncorrupted scholar—to put all the technological
advances around us in perspective. We cannot afford to allow ourselves
to be amazed at trifle advancements, as well as to be enslaved by truisms
and multiplied banalities. On top of it, it is unfathomable how
humanity can live under the tyranny of botched fundamentals of
science, invisible, yet holding it in an iron grip.
DELIBERATE MESSING UP OF PHYSICS—This brings
us to the mandate to promptly clean the utter cognitive mess in
physics. This messy state is deliberately kept messy by the iniquitous
Machiavelli-type activity of deeply corrupt so-called experts. These
experts have made themselves dear to the politicians, who are
scientifically ignorant to the core. These corrupt so-called experts are
heavily manipulating the politicians to have them keep funding the
absurdities foisted as science. As a result, politicians keep shamelessly
spending billions and billions of taxpayer dollars, without any

234
  Political Pivot of this Book 

accountability and without having even a thought of

requiring accountability from the corrupt to the core propagandists of
the absurd, presenting themselves as scientists.
CHANGING THE WORLD—Some remember the episode,
when a British prime-minister struck the speaker’s rostrum in
Parliament with the book of an Austrian writer, pronouncing that what
that book contains comprises the basis of her ideology. That ideological
adoption changed the world, all at once converting into petty
bourgeoisie owners (called today middle class), those who formerly
owned only their hands. This newly-minted petty bourgeoisie has
stability and tranquility as its interest, in order to preserve its crumbs ...
pardon, property. It would not be in its best interest to stage riots and
uprisings. Apparently, however, lately, all those people everywhere have
become very much awakened, traveling everywhere, and their babble
cannot be out-talked. Therefore, it was necessary to take out again the
whip of eugenics in the form of a fictitious pandemic, in order to make
them settle down a little. By pushing these newly-minted petty-
bourgeois even further down, along the slide of the advanced Nazism
(now known as post-modernism), by the authoritative promotion of
drug addiction by someone, a sinister faculty at Harvard, by the
complete degradation along all other lines of existence, and you have a
perfectly acceptable population from their (elite’s) point of view, to
come willingly to be milked, blankly staring while meekly ruminating.
THE VIRGIN MEDIOCRITY OF AMERICA—Some
have expressed the opinion that the natural leader of the Collective West
is undeniably the United States. Following the United States, projects
such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and later the
European Union project, were created.
That opinion is controversial. Rather, the ideological leader is
the wrinkly old thought of musty Europe, which has found a docile
reflector in the face of the pristine mediocrity of the big muscular bus-
boy, the United States, who is the only one capable of carrying out Old
Europe’s job throughout the rest of the continents. The former
President made attempts, as clumsy and nevertheless meeting fierce
opposition as they were, to stop that, but that attempt itself was

235
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

stopped. As said, the hundred-headed hydra of modern elaborate

slavery will never give in without a fight.

236
NEW PRO-ACTIVE APPROACH IN
ANALYSIS—PERSONAL SEEKING
UNEQUIVOCAL PROOF

From all said so far, it becomes evident that a completely new approach is
needed in the analysis when decisions are to be made about the implementation
of public policies. The analysis should be reverted from passive adoption of
external experts’ advice to pro-actively seeking ways to become informed
personally, whenever possible, about methods leading to unquestionable facts,
especially when it concerns pivotal issues of national policy. A prime example of
such a profound problem, which can be tackled personally by the uncorrupt
politician and decision-maker, avoiding external help from experts, who are all
corrupt without exception, is the understanding that relativity and progeny are
brazen absurdity (cf. Addendum) and must never be mentioned in a public
setting, much less supported in any way, shape or form. If these so-called experts
were not all corrupt, without a single exception, if they had any integrity at all,
the absurdity epitomized by relativity would have long ago been chased away
from physics, instead of avidly lavishing on it the money of the taxpayer. This
plundered money is stolen from real science, which society is actually in
desperate need of.
Personal analysis based on un-corrupt, honest real science, must
become the practice in every politician’s office. Otherwise, there will
always be the risk of becoming a victim of scare tactics of groups in society with
deep vested interests, who would not bat an eye at manipulating and outright
lying to the public official, in order to achieve their iniquitous goals. These
charlatans have already had over a century to perfection their
art of deception and outright lying. Therefore, they must never be
approached naïvely with your guard down.
THE NEW APPROACH TO ANALYSIS DISABLES THE
FEAR USED AS AN INSTRUMENT OF CONTROL—The
disgrace of the so-called experts, similarly corrupt as the “experts” which
are letting the absurdity known as relativity persist, not at all discounting

237
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

their benefitting from that absurdity, had another show lately, when a
media-induced threat of a cov-pandemic, questionable as it is,
was overblown to the extent of a major cov-crisis. The fear in question
was artificially instilled, not without the active cooperation of the so-
called medical experts, losing all dignity and professional restraint
when sensing that going along with what the super-wealthy elite
wants to hear, will earn them political points.
This time, at least, that expert downfall took place with a few
exceptions, unlike the solid wall of deception maintained for over a
hundred years and counting, by every possible physics “sage”,
shamelessly lying about the greatness of relativity.
Once that fear of cov-pandemic was stoked and sunk in,
destructively worming itself into society, ready, set to go, economists
were launched to analyze this foreshadowed crisis. Some of these
economists, however, willingly or unwillingly, serve further purposes,
allowing themselves to be used as justifiers of a tighter central
governance. Once the feeling of crisis is established and the scare of
upending everyone’s life becomes a household item, the road is open to
implementing innovative methods of totalitarian societal control. The
old totalitarian ways have already exhausted their potential, mainly
because when they are at play, they inevitably also create dissents and
resistance. In the innovative artificially designed new totalitarianism, on
the contrary, everyone is a willing participant in his own suppression.
Employing the exaggerated fear of losing self-protection and the sense
of self-importance, overcome even the basic instinct of survival, which
naturally fends off external threats, which may or may not be that
substantial. The threat, manufactured or not, is internalized. No one
even cares to analyze what the origin of the threat is, as long as he sees
his fellow citizens being all engulfed into the same fear—the self-
induced herd mentality creating contagious fear. It may not be for no
reason, goes the common perception. This is an extremely vicious way
of central control, which, together with the ubiquitous monitoring of
every word and every step, as well as the intellectual diminishing via
drugs, vapid entertainment and other degrading activities and views
instilled through brainwashing, turns the individual, who once had the

238
  New Pro-Active Approach in Analysis 

potential to be creative, into an unrepining robot.

Of course, all this is replete, just in case, with unfounded
declarative optimism, seen in the texts of the very fearmongers that have
designed the mass panic, which could be dismissed, if it were not so
nagging that one wishes not to have read it. And, of course, these texts
are replete with typical waterfall of empty economics lingo. Skipping
these pages will cause no harm to your reading. On the contrary, it
would save minutes of your life, which would be better spent on finding,
behind all this filler-talk, exactly what the author is up to.
This book has devoted more than a few pages to the new pro-
active approach to analysis, employing the personal seeking of
unequivocal truth. This personal seeking of unequivocal truth ranges
from the ultimate absolute truth, mandating the entire removal of
relativity from science, to absolute truths such as the pattern-evidence,
forming cracks in the make-believe set-in-stone story about a cov-
pandemic. Pattern-evidence-absolute-truths, especially referring to the
early stages of a claimed pandemic, such as the few months after Friday,
13 March, 2020, when the healthcare system is still not destroyed due to
a lockdown and the data are not contaminated with fallout from the
destroyed healthcare system, are indeed the most operative when casting
doubt over the reality of the cov-pandemic. This dwarfs any other claim
for truth an individual may hear about that pandemic.
When it concerns the truths which one can hear and try to rely
on, even if deciding to devote years of his life to systematic study
of microbiology, immunology and biochemistry, are not characterized
with the certainty he can bet his life on—these disciplines have their
successes but they are not of much help for the practical goals of
medicine, especially when categorical decisions have to be made
regarding public health policies.
Furthermore, knowing the corruption which poisonously
controls physics, viciously protecting nonsense incomparably easier to
establish than the public medical state of the population, I would have
zero trust in anyone’s opinion and conclusion on the matter, especially if
it arrives from a privately owned medical enterprise, in general, and in
particular, when viruses are at play, the bitter disagreements between

239
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

virology practitioners notwithstanding—the inherent difficulties in the

above specialties became widely apparent in the so-much advertised
purported cov-pandemic, together with specialists’ disagreements
acquiring significant publicity. The additional financial bonuses
hospitals get for declaring that a patient is a COVID-19 patient, are also
to be mentioned. How can one trust the reports such a system
broadcasts?
“Thegreatresetter”, however, sidesteps these difficulties and
proceeds in his analysis from the axiom that the pandemic is
unquestionably real, as requested by his masters who have ordered his
attempt of analysis—if someone is in doubt that “thegreatresetter’s”
writings are not original regarding the final goal, the “great reset”, there
is plenty of literature and material on the net throughout the years that
can be consulted, proving that these ideas have been floating in the air
for decades. The opportune connecting of an alleged cov-pandemic
with the “great reset” is not much of an accomplishment. It only
reinforces the impression that the cov-pandemic was brought about
deliberately. Furthermore, the pattern-evidence causing
“thegreatresetter” to be compromised enough, making his unrestrained
firmness of conviction in the reality of cov-pandemic unjustified, the
mostly trivial and foreseeable analyses “thegreatresetter” presents, exert
a final blow to any initial enthusiasm to read his writings.
With the premise in mind, even if illusory, that there is a real
pandemic, it comprises a matter of genuine interest for some to
speculate about different scenarios of development. This is what some
mathematicians do by playing with fictitious numbers, feeding a
program written to solve a system of differential equations. One can
feed the program with any frivolous data and the program will dutifully
calculate and give an answer. It will even draw a graph. What is crucial
in this case, if we want the result at the exit to make any sense, is what
data we are inputting. A wind mill will grind equally well brick rubble
and wheat grains. However, what good does the former do if we expect
to bake bread?
Therefore, instead of the impact of pandemic,
“thegreatresetter” had better talk about the impact of the artificially

240
  New Pro-Active Approach in Analysis 

created media-product, designed to instill mass fear. This would be a

trivial talk, however, as said. Indeed, once it is clear that we are dealing
with a media-made crisis, based on make-believe impetus, what does it
matter if we would talk about exacerbating of food shortages and
disruption of food supply chains? Any panic, either real or artificially
induced, dumped on society would cause these tragedies. Therefore,
again and again, the question of reality of cov-pandemic is crucial.
The rest is a matter of trivial economic analysis of the effect of just any
crisis, cov-crisis or non-cov-crisis, a trivial economic analysis,
which by itself is mostly questionable under any circumstances
anyway.
RADICAL CHANGE BY YOUTH—Youth has always been
the harbinger of change. Many times impatient, often used, due to lack
of experience, by insidious forces, it may appear radical in its call for
change. If restoring truth, which should usually be the necessary and
expected thing to do, is to be portrayed as the “radical change” which
youth wants, so be it. It does not matter how one would label that desire
to restore truth. Call it what you want, but restoring the understanding
that there is truth must take place, if society is to survive. It is not
technology but the correction of cognition by the only adequate way,
primacy of real science, disallowing surrogates iniquitously portrayed as
science, that will save us from collapse. Sheer development of technology
is not a guaranteed prerequisite for success. Abused, technology, even
very advanced, can sometimes be deadly dangerous, as the examples of
the abused splitting of the nucleus or binary arithmetic, discussed
elsewhere in this book, can be. Thus, before addressing climate change,
various biology-related rights and economic reforms, society must focus
on restoring truth through un-corrupted real science. Otherwise, there
will be confusion and confusion is far from the best friend of solving any
problems, least of all social problems. Social change, inevitably led by the
youth, would be of low quality, if it is not guided by reason and truth
and if the youth continues to be massively abused at the universities by
the travesty of the absurdities presented as science. Without restoring
truth, progressive social change is doomed. The “great reset”, if that
would be an honest improvement of the world and not just a devious

241
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

way to serve a handful of the elite to strengthen its grip on the world,
can be successful only under the guidance of real truth. Otherwise,
youth can easily be brainwashed by the sweet talk of the refined
manipulators and used in their games leading to enslavement, which the
youth cannot even fathom. Discussion of one especially vicious
slavery follows.
COV-PANDEMIC IS BETWEEN RELATIVITY AND
CLIMATE CHANGE REGARDING CERTAINTY OF PROOF
—Speaking of a pro-active approach to analysis, which consists of the
personal search for unequivocal, absolute truth, we ought to appreciate
that there is a hierarchy of situations allowing a different extent of
reaching the proof for unequivocal truth. Thus, as far as certainty of
proof goes, the cov-pandemic event resides between two extremes,
exemplified, on the one hand, by relativity, and on the other, by the
anthropogenic climate change. The certainty about the former extreme,
the absurdity of relativity, is absolute and the mandate that relativity and
progeny must be removed from science is unequivocal. As far as the
latter extreme, the claim for anthropogenic climate change, goes, no
party, neither the one in support, nor the one that denies anthropogenic
climate change, can produce even partial unequivocal arguments that it
is or that it is not the result of human activity. Thus, to reiterate
emphatically once again, the only problem of global character; at that, of
significance much exceeding that of pandemics and anthropogenic
climate change, even if they indeed are real phenomena, is the
unequivocal demise of relativity. The pro-active approach to analysis,
involving personal search for absolute truths, really blossomed when this
author discovered the unequivocal proof for the absurdity of relativity,
which is actually a theme of unsurpassed public significance, and is the
only problem of global standing that can immediately be resolved
categorically, beyond a shadow of a doubt.

242
QUANTUM MECHANICS, ANYONE?
-

As if the ignoring of the most important problem of global public policy

—the vigorous promotion and support of the obvious absurdity known as
relativity—was not enough, lo and behold, out of the blue,
“thegreatresetter” bombards us with another intellectual pathology. It has
obviously occurred to “thegreatresetter” that interjecting a term such as
“quantum mechanics”, sounding very elevated, into a conversation about
the world affairs, would turn that conversation into a more learned exposé,
ergo, holding more weight. The outrageous involvement of a falsity, such
as the non-scientific notion of quantum mechanics, which must be
categorically shot down at once, even if “quantum mechanics” is intended
only as a metaphor—in a text on the matters of a supposed “great reset”—
is to sink the conversation into irrationality, no matter that the party in the
conversation has heard that quantum mechanics is a great thing, not
knowing exactly why.
Adopting quantum mechanics as a given, without knowing one
thing about its real essence, and using it for explanations that suit you,
resembles very much the taking of pandemic as real, without having your
own proof for it and ignoring absolute truths countering it, and then
proceeding to build mental constructs, such as the “great reset”, aimed at
saving the world using this actually problematic pandemic as a tool.
By the way, quantum mechanics does not derive that a particle
can be in two different places at the same time, as has incorrectly occurred
to “thegreatresetter”. This impression is created because quantum
mechanics resorts to the logical fallacy known as petitio principii, which
means “begging the question”, known also as a “circular argument”. This
completely unacceptable situation, defying real science, was arrived at
when the delta-constucts, which are not, as they should be, the solutions
to the postulated eigenfunction equations, were further found not to
belong, as they should belong, to the so-called Hilbert space. The solution
to this crashing problem was nonchalantly offered to be similar to the
solution in the story known to some as “Columbus’ egg”. The sailors,
gathered around a table aboard the ship Santa Maria, were trying to make

243
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

an egg stand on end. After watching them try unsuccessfully,

Columbus grabbed the egg and crushed it on the table—there, the egg
now stands on its end. Some may like this story as a great story of
ingenuity—helplessly solving a conundrum by destroying the object
that conundrum pertains to. However, applied to quantum mechanics,
such a destructive appearance of creativity is a disaster. Thus, those that
were determined to keep quantum mechanics in physics came up with
the “brilliant” idea to pull out of thin air the ridiculous proposal that a
particle can be in two places at the same time. Then, once they
themselves suggested something which quantum mechanics should
itself have derived but it didn’t, those great “inventors” began to sillily
amaze themselves how great this new science is, what incredible non-
intuitive conclusions it comes up with and what strange rules it obeys.
If one needs to invent something really asinine, there can be nothing
more handy than the described vapid conclusion, falsely thought to
come from quantum mechanics.
So, we see that relativity is not alone in the world of the absurd.
The absurd relativity has worthy company in the face of the asinine
quantum mechanics.
The above pathological science, going by the name of quantum
mechanics, has spread like wildfire, penetrating even territories way
foreign to physics and now is governing the cognition of the world,
together with the absolute absurdity known as theory of relativity.
On the other hand, paradoxically, the adoption by China of
the western non-science idea of quantum mechanics as a legitimate
pursuit, believed to hold even the promise of quantum computers, may
work in favor of the West—what is more advantageous to the West
than its enemy spending its resources on provable nonsense? At the end
of the day, the totalitarian system is irrational. It obeys a central control
and if this central control is swayed to think that exhausting the
country’s resources on a given idea appears good, there is no argument
in the world which can convince that central governance that the idea is
actually bad. Too bad that the West has itself adopted to beat itself up
through irresponsibly wasting its public resources on the bad science of
quantum mechanics, otherwise, sending it to China to undermine it,

244
  Quantum Mechanics, Anyone? 

would sound like a perfect ploy.

Private companies learn that an idea is bad the hard way, unless
they deliberately decide to turn their resources to waste. Thus, the private
company promptly reverts to calling its R&D activity “quantum
computing”, only in name, while proceeding its usual development of the
software principles under that assumed name. Why would it even do that
and not call it like it is? It may be speculated that because, especially the
big corporations, are intertwined in public-private partnerships, there
may be influences from the government, infiltrated by experts, who are
corrupt without exception, who have vested interests in maintaining the
understanding in the government that it is quantum mechanics that
holds the promise for the miraculous computing future, despite the
obvious proof that quantum mechanics is nothing other than a dead-end.
Now, of course, someone who has not been exposed to science
may not be quite sure what has been explained above, as he will not be
quite sure what major sages in economics mean when they make
comparisons with quantum mechanics. Such anxious reader, however,
need not worry so much because, as was already said, the sage economist
himself has no clue what he is talking about, but only peppers his text
with quasi-scientific lingo, to appear even more sage, let alone
trustworthy. However, even the sage economist should not worry too
much because even a figure such as one former President of the United
States allows himself to adhere to notions he himself has no clue about.
Recall the mentioned, Harvard-induced senselessness claiming curvature
of the “Constitutional space” because, see, physics has derived that space
can be curved, which that former President was never heard to relent
from, since real un-corrupt physics had never derived such a thing. Of
course, officials, especially holding high positions, are not expected to be
at the same time practicing physicists. However, they are expected not to
part with their brains and when they are to adhere to craziness such as
curvature of the physical, let alone Constitutional, space, they had better
consult the appropriate literature themselves, not rely on someone
else’s “expert” opinion, which in the case of quantum mechanics, as in
the case of relativity, will always be corrupt, without exception.
The reader may wonder why the emphasis in this book was not

245
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

on the personal understanding of the unequivocal truths bringing down

quantum mechanics as a candidate to be considered science, rather than
talk about relativity? Moreover, “thegreatresetter” mentions quantum
mechanics, not relativity. The answer is simple. First, the destructive
global importance of relativity is on par, if not greater than that of
quantum mechanics. Second, elements of quantum mechanics will be
retained after the overhaul of physics. Suffice it to say that classical
mechanics, which upon reform in physics and further developing must
substitute quantum mechanics, is quantum in nature. In contrast,
relativity, being brazen absurdity, must vacate science altogether,
without a trace. The most important reason for illustrating the pro-
active approach of getting convinced personally in the unequivocal
truthfulness of claims utilizing relativity, apart from its major global
import, is that relativity is an at once demonstrable absurdity, which the
average person who has never been tempted to deal with science, would
understand without much effort. In contrast, to understand the
bogusness of quantum mechanics, one needs to have already had
exposure to science on a college level and beyond. This limits the
audience capable of understanding the travesty of purported science and
that reduces the democratic character of exposure to truths of major
world impact.
To recap—although what was said above about quantum
mechanics is true, it may require some exposure to science, in order for
the understanding to sink in that quantum mechanics is not science. On
the other hand, luckily, understanding the unequivocal proof, also
discovered by this author, that relativity is an absurdity, can be achieved
by practically anyone (cf. Addendum). In addition, anyone with a
smartphone can follow and see for himself that catastrophic proof in
another book of mine, entitled “Relativity is the Mother of All Fake
News”, which may be read online by following the link:
timeisabsolute.org.
In addition, here is one conclusion of even broader significance
—the absolute argument in the book published in timeisabsolute.org (as
well as seen here in the Addendum), regarding the most important
question of public policy, gives the writer of this book the authority to

246
  Quantum Mechanics, Anyone? 

demand urgent restitution of the fact that there is truth, that truth is
real and unique and that there is an urgent mandate to reform science,
which today has sunken into incredible irrationality. Restoring science
back to its path of logic and reason is of utmost importance
because such reformed, uncorrupt, real science, is the only vehicle
to reach unabated, pure truth. In particular, correct establishment
of truth is crucial also in evaluating and solving the partial problems
of humanity concerning the reality of pandemics and anthropogenic
climate change, to name a few.
Having in mind the above, it is clear that to discuss
international affairs in terms of quantum mechanics, as
“thegreatresetter” attempts to do, is nothing other than idle talk, to say
the least. Besides, it is not only because of quantum mechanics being
bad science and a non sequitur that it should not be used when it comes
to world matters. Over and above that, it is true, in general, that, while
two different observers are indeed entitled to their opinion, there is only
one truth about a phenomenon, which a sane person must recognize,
not continue to stick to his personal alternative understanding of that
phenomenon, counting it as the truth. Truth is established, not by the
subjective opinion of someone, but by the objective methods of science
founded by Galileo as early as four hundred years ago. We will pay some
more attention to this question, being provoked by the apparent
confusion on the matter by “thegreatresetter”.
What boggles the mind, even at first glance, is that, despite all
the talk by “thegreatresetter” about the world enormously speeding up
its development, especially technology, the velocity at which humanity
gets to understand the above truism concerning the reality and the
unity of truth, is practically zero. Humanity continues to fantasize and
hallucinate on the topic of truth, the way it still fails to understand
probably the greatest discovery of Galileo; namely, that uniform
translatory motion is akin to rest. This four-century standstill in the
understanding of the latter was already commented upon in
“VELOCITY OF TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS”, but that very
much pertains to the topic at hand, discussing the new pro-active
approach in analysis and establishment of truth—one does not

247
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

need to wait for anyone to be told where truth lies, but must go out and
get hold of that truth himself, as much as that is humanly possible.
Thus, go to the Addendum, read it and understand yourself that
relativity is absurdity. No need to hear it on the radio or see it on the
TV. All that such media will provide you with, regarding this most
important issue, concerning the cognitive health of humanity, are
outright lies. In view of this paradoxical situation—an unequivocal
proof available for anyone to see, lied about across the board by all
media—it seems appropriate to continue some of the discussion that
was already done in “DEVASTATING EFFECT OF INFUSING
PHILOSOPHY INTO SCIENCE”. Such discussion has an
especially necessary emphasis on the difference between something
being real as opposed to being truthful, which apparently
comprises a moment of confusion by “thegreatresetter”.
Thus, we will again note that the question of reality and
truthfulness cannot be decided philosophically because philosophy is in
effect theoretical psychology, which makes even its deepest studies of
the à priori nature of thinking, exclusively subjective. We will remark
once again that it was Galileo who realized, for the first time, the
connection between this subjective prison of the mind, whereby,
according to the incorrect understanding of Kant “all our knowledge
begins with experience” (cf. “Critique of Pure Reason”), with the true
realities of the external world. In other words, Galileo was the first who
made it possible to correct the subject’s own experience by objective
observation of the external world by applying the methods of science.
This was a profound cognitive advancement of humanity, only to be
squandered by the sheer absurdity of the pathological activity during
the twentieth century, insidiously pushed as great science.
The real science, developed during the course of three centuries
after Galileo, using its objective methods of acquiring knowledge,
outright denouncing the idea that “There can be no doubt that all our
knowledge begins with experience”, overthrowing the opinion that
mere perception can be the source of objective true knowledge, affirms
the reality and uniqueness of a single truth about a given phenomenon.
Real science definitively overthrows the false idea that truth is only a
matter of point of view, that it is only an interpretation, an invention

248
  Quantum Mechanics, Anyone? 

and a metaphor.
Let us once again note that these aberrant contaminations
confusing the notion of truth, leading to the decimation of the quality
of thought, became possible because it was allowed for philosophy,
which is incompatible with science, to be introduced and eventually to
take over science, as well as to impose its tolerance toward the
coexistence of even mutually contradictory ideas.
Failing to distinguish the difference between science and
philosophy, the former retaining only the successes, while the latter
keeping all there has ever been in philosophy, despite mutually
contradictory views, allowed to co-exist, has given rise to the wrong
impression in many, including political officials and decision-makers,
that subjective opinions being real, are no less valid. This is the epitome
of incorrect understanding of what is valid and trashes three centuries
of development of science. It is very significant to understand that,
especially in international relations, it is not important for the world
what is in the heads of the politicians, the way it is not important for the
world how someone in a mental institution comprehends the world. In
the same way, the views of someone under the influence are real, but
not correct, to say the least. This is like saying that the elections were
not rigged but were only fortified, as Time magazine puts it. What a
horror the world would be if the views about the world of someone
who had one too many, as real these views are, albeit confused, is to
decide the world’s fate. The views of the patrons of a watering hole
coexist, all of them being real, but how is this contributing to correct
and valid cognition (it may give rise to artistic creation, but this is
another story)? There is no excuse for the view of a dictator, who thinks
that it would be good for the world to set it on fire. Such view is very
much real, but to be tolerant and to consider that it is no less valid than
the view of a leader who strives for world peace, is disingenuous and
irresponsible, if not suicidal. It boggles the mind how thoughts
expressing such possibilities; namely, that subjective opinions, each one
of them being no less real, are no less valid, that each one being no less
valid than any other one, can even be expressed officially in all
seriousness, unless offending the intelligence of the reading audience is

249
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

not of the essence.

The fact that different analysts see the same data but reach
different conclusions, is not intrinsic to a correct analysis.
Such difference is not objective but is due to the actual deficiency of the
data or the method of analysis.
Unfortunately, even when the proof is unequivocal and clear
as a sunny day, other, extra-scientific factors, mostly of financial and
political strength, play a role in preventing the inevitable
acknowledgment of the sole truth.
In this respect, the case of relativity provides the best example
there could ever be. It would be impossible to find a better example to
illustrate the new pro-active approach in analysis—the personal seeking
of unequivocal proof. Relativity invalidates itself in the pages of the
very paper which puts it forth (cf. Addendum). There are no two sane
observers who will see equality of the formulae which factually
catastrophically differ from each other, thus rendering relativity absurd.
Even a child will distinguish between two patterns, if the concept of
formulae is too heavy to grasp. This very fact of the two formulae being
illegally different, in direct opposition to the very definition of the
theory, makes it immediately scarce for science.
Relativity still persists in the public milieu, however. Why?
This unequivocal catastrophic fact is not the result of the incredible
complications due to opium wars, there are no secrets concerning
commodities or complicities of trade agreements. The dramatic fall of
relativity is an immediate fact, which can be presented under oath
before the US Congress. The US Congress can determine the veracity of
this fact using its own devices, without the services of external experts
who are always, without exception, corrupt. Establishment of this fact
will inevitably mean the cancelling of billions of dollars which now flow
into the infinitely avaricious mouth of gluttonous charlatans,
mercilessly sucking the blood of the American taxpayer.
Therefore, before even trying to solve the complex multi-
factorial problems of the partial country-to-country relations, the global
community must come to terms with the fact that it has become a
victim of the occupation by the worst enemy of science, and

250
  Quantum Mechanics, Anyone? 

therefore, of human thought—relativity—spreading out on the

grandest possible global scale. No other doctrine, political,
religious or whatnot, has engulfed the entire globe. Unfortunately,
that ubiquitous doctrine is a brazen absurdity.
The example of relativity, pivoting this book, provides the clue
as to why a book like this has a very deep, steady and insurmountable
underpinning, which cannot be shaken, no matter how controversial,
for some, the rest of the views of this author may appear.

251
 PERCEIVED DIGITAL
TRANSFORMATION
ACCELERATION

We should not forget what the text promoting the “great reset” advocates.
There is, in principle, a general idea, aimed at serving the ruling elite;
namely, that the wider population must somehow be conditioned to think
that the “great reset” is not only imminent, but it will be accelerated by
something, even if that something were to appear by happenstance. The
idea for the “great reset”, although floating in the air since its inception,
probably around the nineteen seventies, even decades earlier, the concrete
global mechanism for its efficient societal implementation has been
wanting. Conveniently and accommodatingly, the year 2020 brought into
someone’s evil mind the sordid idea that the assistance for that global
implementation could be in the form of an unexpected lever, moreover,
counterintuitively stimulated by the absolutely unacceptable central
political control of a separating force, diametrically opposing the ostensibly
cohering ideas of the “great reset”. The mass global hysteria created
through the mass media, claiming a cov-pandemic in 2020, was dished out
and served on a platter, as the breakthrough for the impasse, caused by the
lack of said global mechanism. The cov-pandemic served as the actual
signal and guarantor of the impending political coup d’état at any rate,
even if that would mean undermining the most basic principles of
democracy. Well, the “great reset” itself is totalitarian and undemocratic, so
why should its herald, the purported cov-pandemic, be concerned about
democracy anyway? Although it must be confessed that this was not the
most brilliant operation that could be carried out for the purpose, given
the indelible pattern-evidence, poking holes into the coronavirus pandemic
conjecture, presented as ironclad. However, it did the job.
Therefore, why should the people who committed the coup d’état
care at all about the “aesthetics” of their anti-democratic tool of choice?

252
  Perceived Acceleration 

HOW WILL THE “GREAT RESET” HANDLE THE

CENTRAL PROBLEM—RELATIVITY?—There is a bigger
question, however—no matter what may be said about the above
breakthrough of the impasse, be it ironclad or punctured with holes, or
whether or not it is a manipulation, the pivotal question still hangs over
any proposal for social change; namely, what is any proposal for social
change going to do with the tolerating, by paying dearly through
squandering mountains of taxpayer money, the absurdities presented as
science? Will society and its captains continue to be blind to this
dramatic, most important, central problem, the way it was glaringly
blind throughout the entire twentieth century? Unfortunately, they
will, because, as said, straightening out science does not even exist as an
item on the agenda of the elite, not that the real elite rulers are able to
understand the matter and appreciate its importance, but other things
are holding them back. All in all, the impression one gets when reading
the materials written by their “greatresetter” cronies, promoting elite’s
agenda, is that we are dealing with pronounced mediocrities, having
nothing else to do but to think about solving world problems through
employing very unsophisticated methods, including when they are
concerned about saving their own skin.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AIDING THE
RESOLUTION OF THE PIVOTAL QUESTION—Never
forgetting the above dominant pivotal problem humanity has,
mandating the dealing away with absurdities in science, such as
relativity, and their encroaching on society at large, one, indeed, may
ponder about one or the other of the less important questions, such as
the reality of pandemic, so much promoted by the propaganda.
However, no matter what the answer to that lesser questions turns
out to be, it will never mitigate the centrality of the question for the
removal from science of the absurd relativity. The removal of this
fatal absurdity is crucial for the very existence of humanity because it
introduces a landslide of muddled thinking.
A slight hope for the resolution through removal of that sticky
absurdity-laden relativity, may be held due to influx of the Artificial
Intelligence (AI). Artificial intelligence, unless it is headed to

253
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

self-destruction, is absolutely intolerant to internal contradictions,

epitomized by the basis of relativity and progeny. However, wouldn’t it
be paradoxical, if not demeaning to humanity, to delegate the solution
to machines created by this very humankind, instead of humankind
itself tackling this absolutely resolvable problem, especially provided
that humans are capable of unequivocally resolving this problem at
once, right at this moment, by decisively depriving of support
absurdities such as relativity and progeny?
Regarding the even lesser problem, it is quite speculative
exactly what will speed up the “digital transformation” that would
bring us closer to a full-fledged AI. Indeed, it is nothing but speculative
to infer that said speeding up would take place by relegating it primarily
to social factors, least of all social factors such as the cov-crisis, as
implied by “thegreatresetter”. Indeed, there may be an element of truth
that confining the workforce to its place of dwelling, may stimulate
businesses servicing that particular change of the social condition
caused by any crisis, not by just cov-crisis. However, it is too ambitious
for one to claim that he has found the real generator of such AI-
stimulating creativity. To say nothing of the ghastly scary potential such
digitalization possesses, to impassionately judge every one of us, based
on coldly centrally assembled data through deep penetration into
everyone’s privacy. This is not some technical fiction, but is so
rudimentary and easily achievable even today, at the current level of
development of the digital techniques, that, should the central
authorities decide to implement it on a state or federal level, it can be
established overnight, the way the world was changed overnight by the
centralized massive global scare of purported cov-pandemic. As said, a
hunveybin-controlled, a.k.a. Red-Guards-controlled, Wuhan region in
China, cooperating with the Western “great reset”-promoting Davos
elite, was used as a laboratory experiment for that “social scoring”
totalitarian invasion, but the central power in Peking promptly dealt
away with that, in essence coup d’état, experiment. It was already noted
that China has its own brand of totalitarianism, which does not have in
its plans the destruction of the country, as the digital fascism of the
“great reset” does with regard to the West. The implementation of this
elementary anthropogenic digital virus is discussed also in other places

254
  Perceived Acceleration 

of this book. It should be emphasized over and over, because never in

history has there been an opportunity for the elite to impose such deep
and efficient totalitarianism, which reaches at once every crevice and
crack of society, allowing social engineering at an unheard of level; at
that, achievable with the simplest tools resting on the basic trivialities of
the digital techniques.
Having said the above, envisioning closer horizons of history,
one must remark that when one considers longer term prospects, the
illogical system of the “great reset”, which, tracing back its roots which
evolved from the absurd fundamentals of the current pathologically
absurd physics, the “great reset”, heavily relying on the imposition of
the digital fascism, in the long run, will not be able to endure the
essential feature defining Artificial Intelligence; namely, the mentioned
incompatibility with internal contradictions. Therefore, a system based
on the illogical “great reset” is bound to destroy itself sooner or later,
even in the unlikely case that it would ever be implemented. The super-
wealthy elite, now happily encountering and celebrating the supposed
discovery of the “philosophical stone” of its eternal governance,
represented by the totalitarian digital control, will meet with another,
even greater amazement—the artificial intellect, disallowing the
adoption of absurdities as legitimate ways of syllogistic reasoning. The
disapproval of absurdities by the AI will be the death knell to the
aspiration of the elite for eternal governance. It may seem unbelievable
that logic, the strength of the human reasoning, may turn out to be
more powerful than wealth, when it comes to world governance, but
the elite may find that out sooner rather than later, in the same way the
mundane, written on a piece paper, binary arithmetic blew up, in time,
more powerful and potentially more destructive than an atomic bomb.
The power of thought and ideas should never be underestimated. No
super-wealth can ever match it.
CAN THERE BE ANYTHING GOOD THAT MIGHT
COME OUT OF THE NEW TOTALITARINISM?—When
pondering about the totalitarian control, which the “great reset” will
put the world under, we cannot stop thinking about the above curious
thought that came to mind: What if the robotic systems of the elite,

255
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

installed to control and direct society by encouraging politically correct

intentions and deeds and rejecting deeds harmful for elite’s interests,
suddenly become honest and set the software control of their robots to
prevent the outflow of money towards activities promoted as doing
science but, in fact, comprising absurdities. The Addendum provides
an immediately implementable criterion for such rejection. The answer
is that such correction is not what the elite wants. Correct science,
which is the prerequisite for the correct thinking of the populace, is the
opposite of what the elite needs. What the elite aims at, by imposing the
totalitarian control of the “great reset”, is to efficiently subdue the
resistance of the multitude by lowering its intelligence, limiting its
consumption and the follow-up pollution, which would ensure the
elite’s serene existence and eternal power.
Besides, why even use the “great reset”; that is, change the
system which would go as far as destroying the West, for the purposes
of implementing a correction in science, which the current system
can easily handle just as well? The answer is again contained in the last
sentence of the previous paragraph.
THE FULFILLED ULTIMATE DREAM OF EVERY
DICTATOR—“Tracking and tracing” individuals, pivotal for the
“great reset”, especially in these methods’ ever increasing intrusiveness,
is the dream-come-true of every dictator. Who is to say that inventing a
pandemic for the purposes of seamlessly implementing “tracking and
tracing” was not the real intent of those who can afford to subdue the
world under their will?
Besides, how about if the media bugles’ drumming down the
pandemic chant, indeed is really a false alarm? How about if that
false alarm is specifically instituted by the insurmountable
muscle of billionaires with personal agendas, through their privately-
owned global media empires? How is the public to protect itself from
such menace?
BY WHOSE AUTHORITY HAS THE ELITE TAKEN
UPON ITSELF TO SHAPE OUR DESTINY?—Think about what
dramatic real problems, such as removing the absurdities occupying
science, the world has to solve, at the same time when our lifetime is
being prominently wasted by major authorities, on occupying ourselves

256
  Perceived Acceleration 

and talking about common trifles.

Or, wait, I said authorities. By whose order or election are those
advocating the so-called “great reset” put in place, a “great reset” that is
something that directly concerns you and me? At least, what are the
contributions of said elite, aside from using “greatresetter” mouthpieces
to utter unsustained conjectures, which will not command interest even
in the local pub? What have these people, comprising the elite, achieved,
other than for one reason or another being in charge of fortunes? And,
could it be that in view of the answer to the above question in the
negative, their “greatresetter” mouthpieces have adopted authority just
because they, these mouthpieces, even being of only modest means, have
managed to mingle with the billionaires, overhearing what these
billionaires want to hear uttered, and delivering on it?
As I said, I can fully account for by what authority I am
expressing opinions in this book and why my opinions have weight—I
have discovered unequivocal arguments, one of the most crucial of
them, comprising the greatest discovery of all time because it
unequivocally proves the absoluteness of ultimate fundamentals—time
and space—incidentally, presented in the Addendum, a seminal
discovery which practically anyone can corroborate personally, all these
discoveries demanding, in addition, immediate overhaul of major
questions of the most important world science policy. Let us once again
state it explicitly—the unequivocal proof I have discovered mandates an
immediate reform in physics, which would also lead to restoring the
reality and uniqueness of truth, all this requiring immediate cancelling
of billions of dollars and euro in funding of the said absurdities. The
difference between what I am presenting and what “thegreatresetters”
dabble in, is that the latter have all the power of the world, which
renders the vapid thing they say to be heard all over the world, while the
former, the one who really presents flabbergasting proof, mandating real
change, is utterly powerless, and therefore stays unheard, living under a
rock. If anyone has any doubt that power makes truth and not the other
way around, here is a glaring example to that effect in flesh and blood.
NIGHTMARE SCENARIO CENTERED AROUND A
LOWLY APP—In order to illustrate how technically easy it is for the

257
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

elite to control your life through the government installed by this same
elite, for the purpose of control, observe the possibility to have
governmentally-made-mandatory downloading of a tracing app into a
device which by law you cannot refuse to wear. No need to fall into
conspiracy theories, suggesting that everyone will have bar-code type of
chips subcutaneously installed or injected via vaccines, containing
inextricable for-life tiny nanoparticle-size components for personal
identification. No, no conspiracy—the method with the mandatory
implementation of app-downloading is achievable as we speak. This
elementary way of measuring your compliance with the homogenization
agenda of the elite, would determine your ranking in the hierarchy of the
recipients of the traceable “helicopter money” alms, planned by the elite
to be the only source of your sustenance. Simply put, your social score
will determine the amount of “helicopter money” dropped on you for
your sustenance. The app-tracing, as a method of a more thorough way
of monitoring your compliance with the homogenization agenda,
supplements the method of ranking you through the way of your
spending the traceable alms we spoke about earlier, handed to you by the
government.
IS THE DOWNLOADING OF THE APP REALLY
VOLUNTARY?—A detail—although the government may insist that
it should be really voluntary, the requirement that the citizen would
have to voluntarily download the app sounds really like a threat.
Consider the fact that if it is really voluntary and there are citizens who
do not want to download the app, then the whole exercise loses meaning
for obvious reasons—unmonitored population is equal to the
monitored part when it comes to contracting a disease, thus, making the
result from the monitoring underestimate the gravity of the situation. In
order for such method to work, even in its inherently questionable way,
all citizens without exception, not just an even sufficiently high number
of them, must participate. The government knows that, and it is
inconceivable that it will not use other, seemingly benign, methods of
coercion. It definitely would. Such methods of coercion are, for
example, shaming, imposing restrictions for travel or visit to
governmental institutions and even stores, or simply walking in the

258
  Perceived Acceleration 

streets. Clearly, the same sort of coercion applies to vaccines and to other,
advertised as seemingly free, actions that the government would actually
impose on you. Thus, on the face of it, downloading of the app,
vaccination, or what have you, will be voluntary because no one will be
holding a gun to your head to download it, but you will be denied
services and access, sometimes vital ones, to say nothing about privileges
and chance for advancement.
This sort of “freedom” very much resembles the tricks
companies massively use on the internet. They advertise that a software
program or an app is free, but when you fall for that and download it,
you are slapped with the news that you can use it for a limited time only,
after which you must pay, and the program is not free at all. It is the
oldest trick of a store owner—make people visit my store, even if they
don’t buy one thing.
In their usual manner, the proponents of the “great reset” make
lemonade when this problem offers you a lemon. Now,
“thegreatresetter” uses this need for everyone to have downloaded the
app, to advertise his “discovery” that, see, we are all interconnected and,
see, that shows through the “individualistic façade of rights and
contractual obligations”. No, it doesn’t. The rights of the individual are
primary, while his willingness to download an app is secondary. The
former is no façade to conceal the latter, no matter what methods of
guilt-induction the elite and their crony, the government, may employ,
claiming that by refusing to download the app you are adversely
affecting everyone else. According to “thegreatresetter”, this feeling of
guilt, just like the creating a feeling of inevitable guilt instilled in the
soldier, in order to crush him, turning him into an accessory to the army
barracks, a zombie ready to obey orders, is the justification to ensure, in
this way, that the multitude would unconditionally have trust in the
government and the public authorities. However, every time a cunning
representative of “thegreatresetters” begins to advertise that the
government is trustworthy, the immediate retort of someone alert, who
ponders over the reality of the cov-pandemic, let alone reads this author’s
argument shown in the Addendum, is—how can I trust the government
(by “government” understand the elite whose crony the installed

259
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

government is) about something the government itself cannot provide

me with unequivocal explanation? How can anyone trust a government
which ignores the absolutely unequivocal proof presented in the
Addendum, ignoring which leads to squandering taxpayers’ money,
yours and mine, and, at the same time, emphasizes uncertain issues
which serve elite’s agenda, such as anthropogenic climate change and
media-created panic about cov-pandemic?
The answer to all this mess cannot be found in the government
finagling in various Machiavellian ways to twist the hands of the
population into succumbing to download governmental tracing apps.
This mess can be cleared up only by changing the overall science policy
of the world into respecting truth and barring absurdities. This
straightening out of real science must happen first, after which a very
thorough campaign must be waged among the population, very well
distinguishing what is really science, what has elements of science and
what is not science at all. The inflation of the term “science” has gone
too deep in society. Now it is used more as a decoration and as a sign
that what one talks about is significant, although most of the time it is
not one bit significant.
Honesty and integrity in science must replace the vicious
corruption which is occupying it, staunchly protected by the elite and
its sycophant government. Thus, first and foremost, legislation must be
adopted banning the funding of absurdities with taxpayer money, the
way there is a ban on spending governmental money on astrology,
clairvoyance, voodoo and chasing ghosts. As a follow-up action, in the
concrete instance of the alleged cov-pandemic, the main attention must
be directed towards the now totally neglected pattern-evidence, which
will allow judging, not only the reality of the pandemic, but also the
reasons for the observed clusters of anomalies. All other manipulations,
such as paying hospitals additional moneys per alleged cov-patient, to
say nothing about the financial compensation for every intubated
alleged cov-pandemic patient, are nothing other than corruption-
generating practices, instituted to embellish the threat of cov-pandemic,
in order for that threat to appear greater than it really is, so that the elite

260
  Perceived Acceleration 

can use such inflated threat for achieving its incredibly anti-human goals.
In general, instead of inventing funny stories as to how to use a
purported disaster for the purposes of exercises in futile futurism, to put
it mildly, the efforts of society’s leaders must be directed to analyzing
really working systems aimed at real, business-free medical care, starting
with the Semashko-type health systems of Great Britain, Germany,
Scandinavian countries and Japan. By the way, even learning that there
are Semashko-type health systems, reveals the cynicism of the view that it
is not the system based on insurance company intermediaries in the USA,
as opposed to Semashko-type systems of Europe and Japan, that it is not
turning healthcare into business and a service industry, that drives the
prices up, but that everything is the same and something else drives the
healthcare prices up everywhere.
Thus, one cannot help thinking that if futurism is an enjoyable
past-time of the elite, futurism should also be employed to seek viable
solutions for the future of the world. The simplistic, easy but iniquitous
idea, to scrupulously monitor the multitude of people individually, and
that is how to have a grip on an infectious disease, must give way to real
scientific research, which would uncover the common roots of the
diseases and the pathogens affecting everyone on our planet. Gathering
statistics about the habits, and even of health status of people, cannot
substitute for serious research, which the self-proclaimed futurists from
the gin-and-tonic club, are not intellectually equipped to carry out and
probably not capable of even discerning the difference, judging from
“thegreatresetter’s” focus. Therefore, “thegreatresetters” should retire to
their elite caviar-serving lounges and should allow the real scientists, not
the current scientists regurgitating what “thegreatresetters” want to hear,
to take their rightful place at the helm of humanity’s battle with nature.
Any further concerns of companies and private individuals must be
filtered through the competent needle eye of the unmitigated integrity
and honesty of the real researchers, having no “greatresetters” breathing
down their neck, for the lack of having machinery of their own to face the
real issues, too preoccupied with surveillance systems for their own good,
and looking for all kinds of ways to justify that unbridled use of
confidentiality deprivation and totalitarianism, bringing privacy into

261
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

non-existence, as if that is the “new normal”.

This question hangs like the sword of Damocles arriving from
everything said in this book—does anyone trust the government that it
is seriously concerned about the privacy of its citizens when it requires
downloading its app? Any official reassurance on that matter sounds
like another bout of governmental hypocrisy, which is discussed, in
general, also in “CLASSIFICATION OF THE TRITE”. Let alone that
the question of tracking and the follow-up privacy concern,
discussed above in connection with the mandatory app, should not
even be raised before there is clarity about the obvious discrepancies in
the pattern-evidence—the most decisive and unequivocal
available criterion concerning the reality of an epidemic, and even
pandemic.
Obviously, what is sought by the imposing of a
governmental tracking app, is the easy way out of a situation created by
the mass-media, blaming the people that they are not downloading an
app, which would serve as an excuse for tightening the lockdown
measures. Of course, this app example is only one of many excuses for
tightening control which the government may find, once it has
launched the pandemic scare. Notably, however, such excuses would
make no sense in a situation whereby absolute truths are found to
account unequivocally for the reality or the lack of reality, for that
matter, of what is being portrayed by the government as an imminent
danger. Once again, one wishes that the finality of the personal
understanding would be as clear as the finality regarding the
unequivocal proof for the absurdity of relativity, shown in the
Addendum. Alas, the chance to encounter such closure, especially
regarding a question of such high level of global importance, is
disappearingly small. To say nothing of the fact that even if it is so clear-
cut, it still is also ignored societally. The government, installed by the
super-wealthy elite, hypocritically playing the role of people’s voice, has
its own agenda, which has nothing to do with rationality, truth or the
real interests of society at large. Government is a slave to the elite and is
a conduit exclusively of elite’s desires and intentions.
INTERNET—THE INHERENT SURVEILLANCE
DEVICE—As a matter of fact, the potential for surveillance is inherent

262
  Perceived Acceleration 

in the very principle of the internet, if not even in the very principles of
the digital fundamentals and has nothing to do with cov- or whatever
else virology or pubic health policies. The minute one becomes a part of
the world internet manifold (ocean is too weak a metaphor) he cedes his
privacy. The surest way to avoid this menace is to abstain from being
part of it. Therefore, all the philosophizing and simplistic scenarios
devoted to privacy on the internet, are an expression of naïveté, if no
ulterior motives are suspected. Governments and private citizens may
attempt to find ways of protecting privacy, but this is a seemingly never
ending battle, in fact, with an end detrimental to the individual,
foretold. All in all, discussing technical details regarding hardware is
futile because hardware is contingent upon the technologies which the
technological giants develop. These technological giants follow their
own logic, defying second guessing, a logic and its outcome which they
impose on the world, no matter what someone may think. Even worse
is the outcome from discussing websites, which are exemplary with their
plainness, even in their most sophisticated variants. Notably, the
greatest giants in what has been pronounced as industry, have the most
elementary, if not ugly, appearance, looking as common as any other
website. Of course, as a communication tool, the internet is
unsurpassed by anything existing thus far, but it still remains to have its
real potential revealed, because at present, its role is as the greatest
amplifier of human stupidity in history and having the well-known
characteristic, oft cited in internet forums, such as that “the net is like a
sewage canal in Calcutta in which sometimes one can find a piece of
aluminum”. Tomorrow things will be different, but it would be
prudent to abstain from exercises in futurism also with respect to the
internet.
Trivialities of computers and the internet aside, what is really
scary is the nonchalantness with which the talk about violations of
human rights is looked upon today. These violations were considered
abhorrent and deadly sins only several decades ago, attributes only of
the totalitarian societies of the past, exactly the sins which made these
totalitarian societies the primary target of despise. Now, these deadly
sins of the past are deemed inevitable and viewed to be in the

263
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

order of things, if not helpful to society. It is, however, non-

productive to continue analyzing this, at the same time inherent
and radically avoidable, issue. As said, the best way to avoid such
non-productive activity is by refusing to participate both in
discussing it and in involving in anything remotely connected with
internet, as long as you are allowed not to ... Your refusal will resemble
the refusal to board the freight train taking you to Treblinka.
THE REAL DAMNING OF THE LES POÈTES
MAUDITS (DAMNED POETS)—Below is another illustration of
the threat the whole world faces due to the very aggressively foisted but
shallow idea of the “great reset”. Most of what follows has already been
said in one form or another in this book. However, here it is put
together in one place as an illustration of how efficient the new
totalitarianism is, even regarding matters that seemingly can escape its
control. This much efficient, let alone easily implementable, nightmare
scenario, has not had, neither could it have, occurred even to the
most unbound imagination of the dark Utopians describing the
future. The elite really deserves a Nobel prize for inventing it, but that
would mean awarding it to itself.
When we speak of Baudelaire, Mallarmé, or, say, Verlaine, Les
Poètes maudits, we take them as part of a freely accessible culture,
which is given to us as our free choice. He who considers himself
cultured, educated and has senses for enjoying the suggestive poetic
narrative, will go to his home library, where he can reach books
containing such poetry, and will read them at a lonely hour. Someone
who is not so well-versed in the intricacies of the world of culture, will
turn on the baseball channel, open a can of beer and stick to the TV.
This doesn’t apply to everyone, of course. I can see the connoisseurs of
Baudelaire in the middle of the lovers of beer and baseball too.
The present young generation, however, does not realize that it
was not always so, say, when it comes to your home library. In the Nazi
years, the police raided your home and sequestered from the shelves of
your home library selected books banned by the government, for
owning of which you may even be arrested and thrown in jail. Police
sealed with red wax the knob of the radio, set precisely on the

264
  Perceived Acceleration 

governmental radio-station wavelength, so that you could not turn it

every which way, listening to the voice of the enemy. The secret police
were hiding under your window, sniffing to make sure you’re not
cooking meat because cooking meat was banned on Thursday.
Under socialism, especially during its stiffer earlier years, before
the introduction of ridiculous notions such as “developed socialism,”
the cultural matters, sans racist coloring, did not stand rosier. The
reading of various so-called decadent poets like Baudelaire, Mallarmé
and Verlaine, was severely restricted. I do not know if you would go to
jail for reading them, but in their place the propaganda touted poets
and writers on “socialist realism”. In these works of “socialist realism”,
the positive hero is the worker in the factory and the peasant in the field.
These are the working people, the propaganda blared. They do not need
the decadent feelings and hopelessness of the bourgeoisie drones of the
world, which turn from hip to hip all day long and occupy themselves
with feelings of despair and solitude that will not even cross the mind of
the working man.
The new worker needs simple things—a serene look towards a
bright future, food on the table, milk for the child, a place to live, more
recently, a car under the window, and a 15-day vacation on the Canary
Islands. I overexposed the latter a bit, social-democrat-style, having
personally experienced the Swedish model, which seemed to me very
suppressive to the intellect. Really? We will see in a moment what real
oppression is, not that the Swedish model is not oppressive and
uncouthly pathetic to the intellectual.
However, I hear an exclamation—what are your talking about?
I will go home now, will pick a book with Verlaine’s poetry and will
read it to my heart’s content. At least this is the liberty I can enjoy today.
To find out if we will really have this freedom in the future,
let’s remember our “Uncle bot” who watches over anything you say in a
forum on the net and bans you at his discretion—you write something
and after a while you see it deleted by “Uncle bot”. Don’t tell me that a
person does not feel dizzy from such a development. “But you cursed
and that’s why “Uncle bot” deleted you”. However, if “Uncle bot” can
rub at a drop of a hat, there is no guarantee that he will not delete

265
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

something else that is not an expletive, but is a special, politically

incorrect, point of view. This is already happening in reality. If the
President of the strongest nation in the world, could be denied access to
some parasite site, euphemistically called “social network” or “social
media”, of all things, encroaching upon the body of the free internet,
you think they will reckon with you?
But these censoring events are only spurious “white swallows”,
today called by the unfortunate phrase “black swans”, of the “white
whale”, inevitably doomed to one day reach us (if you remember it
from Melville’s novel, ostensibly aimed for adolescents), which is
bound, the plan is, to swallow us by 2030.
In order to understand the principles of this swallowing, we
have to look at the concept of the so-called “post-industrial society”, the
“great reset” intended to be the trigger of that “post-industrial society’s”
final installment.
The “post-industrial society”, was slowly imposed on the
world. It was slowly imposed, in order to avoid stressing out the famous
frog by boiling it too fast. That was done sometime in the late sixties of
the last century through one Club of Rome, by the ruling super-rich
elite, otherwise intellectually mediocre, but very greedy and eager for
totalitarian control. The latter has been transformed today into those
annual meetings in Davos that we hear about from time to time and, in
most cases, we wonder how to make sense of them, if not what’s the big
deal. Obviously, the low speed at which the world was adopting the
“post-industrial society”, and especially the growing staunch resistance
to it, expressed in a major way by the takeover of some
governments adversarial to it, had made it imperative to speed up
implementing the “post-industrial society” to a final victory by the
idea of the “great reset”, calling those who oppose it populists and
demagogues.
Thus, panicky by the fact that none of the totalitarian systems,
which these super-rich interlopers tried to impose on the world,
worked, those super-rich trespassers of peoples’ interests have found, in
the late days of the nineteen sixties, that it is the so-called post-industrial
society that can come to their aid, a kind of society which is sweeping
away the industrial capital at the expense of the financial capital. What

266
  Perceived Acceleration 

does that mean? That means obliteration of industry by a deliberate de-

industrialization, because, the contention is, the industrialization has
reached already such proportions, that it has stimulated, in the name of
profit, environmentally hazardous overconsumption. Most of all, the
overconsumption has created inequalities which lead to revolts and
revolutions. That jeopardizes the power of the mentioned uber-rich
elite, which, due to its greed, ironically, has itself created the mentioned
problems of the over-industrialization leading to overconsumption.
Well, now, tell me, what does the poet Paul Verlaine have to do
with all this, the impatient reader begins asking, almost abandoning the
read just at the moment when the most interesting will begin to happen.
If, however, by a slight chance, the reader is left with a little
patience, he, then, suddenly learns, if he already did not know, that the
super-rich elite is devious like a pregnant cockroach, especially when
that elite has to protect its interests, in order to remain forever on the
throne as the Messiah and the commander of the world. In its being a
sly pregnant cockroach, the uber-wealthy elite invents the uni-
directional concept of the post-industrial society, whereby, the
economy of the master is exclusively service economy, whereas the
manufacturing, polluting, depleting slave economy, will be across nine
seas, in the tenth, plus one or two oceans away.
Before going further, we need to remark about the devastation
which the conversion to post-industrial society brought down on
education and healthcare. The most unnatural effect, going against
their very nature and their goal, is that, alongside everything else in the
service economy, two intrinsically non-profit occupations—education
and healthcare—are now, in the post-industrial society, not only
considered part of the economy, are not only considered businesses, but
are included in the service economy, as if that is the most natural thing.
Thus, the professor at a university becomes service staff, at most a seller,
in some “industry” called education, where the student is the customer.
The patient in a hospital is no longer one of the sick, treated by the
doctor, but is a buyer of a service in the specific kind of supermarket or
mall, called “hospital”, in which the doctor sells the service to the sick
like a salesperson, the way selling takes place at a counter in the country

267
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

store; the medications are no longer for health, but are products, such as
the shoes made by the private business of the neighborhood shoemaker,
and those who buy the shoes are at his mercy. Well, when it comes to
shoes, that works—you see the shoes and you can make up your mind.
How about the medications and the vaccines? What do you know about
them? For the medications and the vaccines, you are fully at the mercy
of the private company. Unlike the shoes from the shoemaker, you don’t
know personally one thing about medications and vaccines. It is the
private company that tells you; the private company, which, no matter
how you look at it, is formed around profit, and the private company
would not bat an eye to turn its back to the scientific truth and to trick
you for the sake of profit. But let’s not delve any further into the various
other details of the post-industrial society. Let’s focus on its essence, on
its heart, especially grafted by the “great reset”.
The heart of the post-industrial society, having the “great reset”
as its further implementation, is the homogenization, the unification,
the equalization of members of society, subordinate to the elite. It is
advantageous for the elite to deal with a jelly-like homogeneous mass of
low intelligence, which has lost its orientations and criteria for truth.
The first thing to accomplish, for this reason, is to have the slightly
richer members of the multitude get a little poorer, and the slightly
poorer members get a little richer—all in all, ultimately, the goal is for all
the commoners to be equally poor and dependent. The “great reset”
works perfectly for the accomplishment of this homogenization goal,
although, more thorough inspection reveals that it is internally
contradictory. Why not? The “great reset” proposes capitalism to be
without capitalism. Why not? The “science” which “thegreatresetter”
holds on to, boasting to “follow the science”, unlike the real science—
the stalwart of logic and truth—allows brazen contradictions and
absurdities, deliberately impounded on the world since the nineteen
sixties in the form of post-industrial, post-modern, globalist, “great
reset” or any other collectivist idea that comes to mind, meaning the
same thing.
Finally, after its two failed attempts at collectivistic
totalitarianism in the last century, the elite found its ultimate totalitarian

268
  Perceived Acceleration 

“philosophical stone”. The means that will lead to the already final,
eternal dominance of the elite, are enclosed in the term “inclusive
capitalism”, which, in other words, is “non-capitalist capitalism”.
Now, I will not enter into an analysis of its individual details,
but will only focus on what directly interests us in relation to the topic
concerning the insurmountable subordination to the direction shown
by the elite, even concerning topics which are seemingly out of elite’s
control, such as reading Mallarmé, Baudelaire and Verlaine.
One of the elements that would help introduce the extreme
totalitarianism in question, is the so-called “helicopter money”, which
by 2030 is planned to be the only money one can use. This is digital,
unencrypted; that is, traceable, money that is given to you “free of
charge” by the elite-installed government. The peculiarity emphasized
more than once in this book regarding that kind of money, is that
anything you do with that “helicopter money” is traced directly to you
personally. The amount of the “helicopter money” alotted to you
depends on your so-called “personal social rank” or some call it “social
score”, which you build yourself. Before I talk about the personal social
rank, let me just emphasize the fact that the non-traceable fiat money
such as dollar, euro, as well as bitcoin-like cryptocurrencies, will be
ruthlessly removed, replaced by the traceable, unencrypted digital
money already mentioned, which must suddenly link to you
personally, any purchase you make, forever preserving the fact of
your purchase and its connection to you, in a central database
located somewhere unbeknownst to you. This, the abolition of
privacy through mass surveillance, is the second very important
element characterizing the extreme totalitarianism, but now elaborated
in its most efficient form. Let’s remember this faceless database,
managed and analyzed by faceless algorithms, and mention that
these are not some conspiracy theories of some professor, sacked
from his academic position because of tossing these conspiracy theories
in front of amazed students, who are taking his course at a university in
Europe, but is a reality, the beginning of which is already in our hands,
in the form of smartphones. As a matter of fact, what the likes of the
said professors do, tossing around theories which allow themselves to be

269
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

labeled “conspiracy theories” due to their obvious far-outness and clear

deficiency of substantiation, compromises the real threat and gives
fodder to the homogenization activists to cry wolf. However, when it
comes to the above-mentioned databases, the collection and analysis of
such databases is now in the power of almost every other average high
school student, therefore it is not out of fiction literature when one
writes about government abusing them. Today, I say, not tomorrow.
For, tomorrow, our fantasy is still in diapers.
So, how does this completely insurmountable totalitarian
system work, in which you will be given, but only conditionally, “free”
money (not to be confused with the money from Unconditional Basic
Income (UBI), which guarantees anonymity)? To preempt the
question—“Where will the government obtain such “free” money
from?”, I will add now that the government, for example, will
constantly emit some imagined debt that the government will sell to
the banks. In this way, the cash that the government will get from the
banks will be nothing else but “free” cash, which the government now
will be able to throw from the helicopter.
Let’s now get to the point. First, it is not advantageous for the
elite that the multitude it commands is not homogenized, let alone
that this multitude is distracted by nonsense, such as reading
Baudelaire and Verlaine, which can also lead that multitude to
unproductive depression, while it must always be positive, be itself,
cheerful and fresh in front of the production line, the weaving loom or
wherever else it is placed to be producing goods or delivering services.
This multitude is not supposed to listen and watch on the TV or read
on the net messages from parties other than the party it is supposed to
listen to, the party favoring the elite’s homogenization agenda. The
people are specifically not supposed to read books such as this one,
because it acts subversively on the consciousness and subconsciously is
actively, albeit covertly, against the fascist homogenization of society
necessary for the elite. To accomplish this prevention, the imposed
digital fascism has simple methods of implementation even today—
accumulating in your personal database red dots of disapproval, if you
buy a beer, not veggies. Buy cucumbers and you’ll earn a black dot of

270
  Perceived Acceleration 

approval. If you’re “green”, you get an approving black dot, but God
forbid if you are nonchalant on “green” matters—the penalty red dot
sticks it to you without delay. Reading Verlaine on line—the red dot in
your database-dossier is added at the speed of light. Show interest in
Christianity or Buddhism—another red dot. Watch a homogenizer-
propagandist on the TV and, as you’d expect, have a swear word come
out of your mouth—the phone records it and assigns you another
crashing red dot. Your toilet bowl is equipped with analyzing sensors
centrally connected to where your database-dossier is, which analyzes
what’s going on there in the loo, and the government knows before you
do if you’re sick and what you are sick from. This is how, little by little,
you’re building your own existential life-record, without anyone even
directly dealing with you, without even knowing it, and with no one to
protest yourself against.
Thus, by building up your indelible welfare-determining
record day after day, it is analyzed by faceless algorithms that determine
how much your actions are consistent with the world’s goal set by the
elite—fully homogenized society, turned into a dull mass with
dumbed-down youth, a dull mass which is designed solely to do work
for the benefit of the elite, a dumbed-down mass tightly controlled by a
salary, at best designed to let the dumbed-down mass survive, and have
not a thought of resistance pass through its mind.
Every day the social-ranking center in question issues, for each
one of the hundreds of millions and billions of people, a summary
“social score” for the current state and place of everyone in the social-
rank pyramid of everyone’s extent of obedience to the homogenization
criterion. This social-rank determines the amount of “free” money
allocated to you. If you are obedient and don’t bother explaining why
the homogenization agenda is no good, you get “free” money to
survive, as well as social approval and access to different amenities. But,
woe to you if you are further down the social-rank pyramid of political
correctness. If you are a big know-it-all, like the element that writes this
book, you’re going to soon become skin and bones, and you’re finally
soon going to come to your end, with the enthusiastic approval of
everyone else. Well, yes, who did he think he was? We’re all obedient,

271
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

struggling hard to get high “social score”, while he found himself

philosophizing. Verlaine, Baudelaire, please! Handled in this way, the
elite will not need armies of censors and riot police any more.
Maintaining the peace; that is, maintaining dumbed-down
homogeneous state of society, will be cheap and unbeatably efficient.
Neither will the elite keep creating dissidents and heroes. All it will
continue creating are pets of the regime installed by the elite, devout
sycophants and comprador rulers, occupied with constant guessing
what to say and how to act, in order to please their masters to get ahead
of everyone else.
Close this book and go to bed.
Well, now that the word “book” was mentioned, if we go back
to the book publishing—how can one imagine that there would be a
publishing house, in all its senses, that would agree to publish a book
based on the above? The publishing house is created to make money by
servicing the mainstream, organized by the elite. If it publishes such
subversive things about the elite (Freedom of speech? Really? Vanish
the thought) the elite will crush that publishing house without even
moving its finger—myriads of fawning sycophants—willing
executioners—will immediately come out of the woodwork, jumping
on the bandwagon of its demolition. So, like I said in my first book
“Relativity of the Mother of All Fake News”—lay this book in the
sepulcher, and forget about it. Someday, someone may find it and may
even want to read it, but that is not even certain. At least the writer of
this book has fulfilled his intellectual duty.
As seen from the above, the elite has contributed to the world
theory of suppression with two separate innovative accomplishments.
First, homogenization of society, which may be accomplished through
many different ways of open administrative intervention. The latter,
however, is an unsophisticated way of implementing the elite’s
discovery that it is specifically homogenization of society that will bring
the final solution to elite’s eternal governance.
Thus, the elite came with the second—digital fascism— quite a
perfidious benevolent intrusion, which already has all the technicalities
of the digital development at hand and which can be applied for a

272
  Perceived Acceleration 

variety of other projects of social engineering as well.

Furthermore, from the above application of the technical
discovery of applying the binary arithmetic, one sees once again the
two-faced Janus of the achievements of technology—one, beneficial for
humanity, allowing for its advancement, while the other, ruinous,
allowing for the greatest enslavement in history of large masses of
people. Recall in this respect the two-faced Janus effect of nuclear
fusion and fission—peaceful “atom” versus atomic bomb.

273
 CONCLUSION
-

One hears once in a while of “great reset”, something which, it is claimed,

does not mean just ordinary starting over in the same rut after a crisis.
Reading about the “great reset”, however, turns out to be a “great
disappointment”. On the face of it, it sounds very attractive—“inclusive
capitalism”, which will shed its ills brought in by the companies caring only
about their bottom line and ignoring everything else that stands in the way
of profit, “inclusive capitalism”, which will curb that greed, a greed
stimulating wasteful overproduction-overconsumption vicious cycle,
harming the environment. However, including in the agendas of
companies, through the dictatorial totalitarianism of the central power of
the government, directed by its super-wealthy elite handlers, concerns
about

• job security of the employees

• sustainable development

• stimulating the advancement of the companies towards green causes

and

• discouraging practices which purportedly harm communities

comes under the “great reset” proposal at a very high price. The high price is
endowing the big corporations and vanishingly few private super-wealthy
individuals and their whims, with the power of totalitarian control over
society, thus entirely replacing genuinely elected governments as well as, if it
is to be capitalism, as the elite doesn’t deny, harming the market by
depriving it from properly functioning, without the purely populist heavy
social decorations, comprising, in fact, deliberately imposed stumbling
obstructions. The different mechanisms of this totalitarian control, such as
the introduction of the centrally controlled digital currency, stripped from

274
  Conclusion 

the gates of privacy, and the ubiquitous monitoring of every member

of society, deliberately impoverished for the purpose, aimed at rating
him, thus shaping his overall behavior towards the elite’s goal—
homogeneity of society—causes a shudder down the spine of every
freedom-loving citizen. If capitalism is to be improved, there are other
methods to be discovered, rather than the-easy-way-out totalitarian
grip over the majority through a “great reset”, for an even greater
benefit to the microscopic few, hypocritically disguised as too
concerned for the welfare of the multitude. Discovering of anything
societally worthwhile, including ways to improve capitalism, requires
real personal intellectual effort, not something done by the way while
sipping champagne over partridge soufflé at the club. It is not
something to be delegated to external helpers and think-tanks, ready to
adjust their analysis according to what they have been paid for by the
elite. It is not a pastime occupation of an elite which will bear fruit
unattended. Most importantly, the genuine improvement of
capitalism cannot happen prior to restoring the trust that truth is real,
prior to restoring the governance of truth. Restoring of truth can only
occur if public money is never allowed to fund absurdities posing as
science, as is the tragic situation today, society wasting inane amounts
of taxpayer money on vapid gigantic projects having the absurd
relativity and progeny at their core. There can be no hope that society
would advance even one iota if it continues to allow the malfeasance
with its money, supposed to be dedicated to the support of real science.
When it comes to totalitarian control, the latest bout of
totalitarian control that was tried on the world was through a made-up
cov-pandemic. The experiment passed with flying colors, but of a toxic
hue—not only was the population subdued and efficiently
hybernated, but the trick used was felt so organically necessary at large,
that the population readily approved of it en masse.
Obviously, this time, unlike the previous attempts at imposing
totalitarianism, which were resisted by the population and had to be
imposed forcefully, now the powers-that-be had successfully hit a
sensitive nerve of the human psyche and the adoption of this type of
totalitarianism is swallowed by society without additional chasers and

275
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

coercion. The promises sound too good and the methods are more
perfidious.
This reminds me of the smoking ban, which was imposed on
New York City a number of years back, and which I thought would
cause a revolution to oppose it. Not at all. The very next day the
smokers everywhere were disciplinely pulling on their cigarettes, cigars
and other smoking devices, whilst obediently standing on the sidewalk
outside the joints. The ban was imposed by the mayor because he
“fatherly” knew what is good for us and, due to mayor’s media empire
global influence, it did not take long for almost the entire world to
adopt that smoking ban. It took me years to sense the answer to the
question—why would a billionaire need to be involved in the mundane
affairs of a mayor, in charge of the nitty-gritty of a city. After a time and
after different similar events occurred, the initial sense of puzzlement I
had developed into the understanding that the person in question really
feels like he is the true Messiah, who knows what is good for us, better
than we do, and has the power to make it happen for everyone’s good.
This was such an unpleasant discovery that I really thought of
commencing to smoke again, just to demonstrate disapproval of the
Messiah part of the mayoral story, not that beginning to smoke is
something that is good for you.
On the other hand, the contradiction is that I, personally, like
the fact that smoking is banned in cafés and restaurants. However, at
issue here is not the good result, but the way that good result was
achieved—through unilateral measures by one super-wealthy person,
who also happened to be the mayor. If societal matters are to be
resolved in this unilateral way, dependent on the wealth status of a
select individual, then we are in jeopardy, because, while smoking ban
was good, the “great reset”, imposed the same way, is the opposite of
good. Besides, while whoever instituted the smoking ban was also an
elected official, aside from being super-wealthy, the several super-
wealthy individuals imposing the “great reset” are not even elected, but
have more power to impose a change of state of society than all elected
officials taken together. Should someone get confused, wondering how
society could fare at all without the stern overview of the figure of a self-

276
  Conclusion 

appointed patriarch, if not Messiah, that someone may consider

ruminating over the possibility for society itself to be able to evolve,
through honest analysis and discussions, without the fatherly care of
individuals whose assistance no one asked for. The danger to the world
of super-concentration of financial might into select private hands
is greater than any global danger that ever existed.
WHEN I HAVE THE FLU I DON’T GO TO WORK—If
we revert the conversation back to immediate practical matters such as
the smoking ban, it goes also without saying that, when one has the
flu, he stays home and doesn’t go to work. There is nothing
revolutionary in such behavior, least of all is it an indication of some
great reset the world has never seen before, dawning upon the
world as a result of a purported pandemic. On the other hand, it
is really amazing that no sophisticated weapons needed to be
invented as part of the arsenal of means to impose the “great reset”.
The evil genius of the elite has figured out a way, having the means
to implement it in their position of private owners of most of the
global mass media, to use such everyday kind of conduct for
accomplishing its goals to goad the populace into the cage of
submission. Plain and simple—scare everyone, lock everyone up as a
willing prisoner, as a result, ruin everyone and the goal is reached—
make everyone line up in front of you, begging. Now at your mercy, at
the mercy of the elite, the populace has no choice but to accept any
“covenant” the elite wants that populace to adhere to, in order for the
multitude, labeled according to its obedience to the “covenant”, to get
its alms. If you obey, and in your actions, as well as in your
thoughts, you prove loyal to the idea of homogenization of society,
your feeding trough will be full of the alms in the form of the
“free” traceable “helicopter” money—deliberately impoverished
through various false-pandemic and other instruments, you have no
other choice. Try the other way and you’ll be sorry.
CHANTING ACROSS FROM LENOX HILL HOSPITAL—
There were people gathering at 7pm every day across from Lenox Hill
hospital branch on 7th avenue, between 12th and 13th street in
Manhattan, chanting in praise of the heroic medics. Come the
inauguration of the new president in 2021, those people are gone. Has

277
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

the virus gone away? Hardly, according to the mass-media, pumping it

hard every day. The visible goal is accomplished, however. The
undesired President is gone and now we may go about our usual
business, forgetting about the heroic doctors, leaving in the hands of
doctrinaires to shape up whatever policies these doctrinaires have in
mind, still using the same tool, the coronavirus, which appears and
disappears whenever it suits the manipulators, the lack, to this day, of all
other advertised visible doomsday signs such as trucks to transport the
bodies notwithstanding.
Also, consider this, if cov-pandemic were real and if it were so
terrible, then you would personally know, God forbid, of tens, if not
hundreds, of your relatives, friends, acquaintances, neighbors who
would have died. Look around you. Is that the case?
EXISTENTIAL THREAT THIS IS NOT—From what
was said in this book, it may be concluded that the writing of
“thegreatresetter” provides no evidence to substantiate that the cov-
pandemic is unquestionably real, let alone that it is an existential threat.
The pattern-evidence points in another direction. No matter how
elaborately designed, that “greatresetter’s” threat-by-design will fade
away, and what will remain will be the temporary victory of the slave-
drivers achieved by so much “fortification”, if not outright
election rigging. Although the further prospects, beyond that
temporary victory, are not good, nevertheless, the future lies in
whether or not humanity will get enlightened and will rise against
the suppressors and their neglect of truth.
THE UNIQUENESS OF THE DIGITAL FASCISM—
From this book, it also became clear that, when predicting an inevitable
flop of the slave-drivers in their pandemic instruments for subduing the
population, we must be cautious that also other global methods will not
be used for the accomplishing of the more general goal of the super-
wealthy elite; namely, the establishment of the digital fascism, based on
unbridled surveillance. Cov-pandemic is just one, albeit extremely
efficient, gate for seemingly plausible justification of mass surveillance
made to appear socially acceptable. The populace, however, must be
alert about other forms of surveillance “justification”, especially ways

278
  Conclusion 

other than pandemic-by-design lockdowns, of specifically desired

deliberate impoverishment of the multitude by the super-wealthy elite,
when surveillance, only perceived by the populace as a secondary
problem, would, in fact, make an alloy with the penury to turn that
populace into an entirely dependent biomass.
Observing one of the sides of the two-side surveillance-penury
coin, ensuring the success of the digital fascism through traceable
money, we must note the limited way the ubiquitous surveillance is
understood by some. Thus, unlike the common-sense objections that
come to mind, or that one hears, about the dangers of ubiquitous
digital surveillance, the actual real dangers extend far beyond the trivial
realization that the big corporations are amassing the data, emitted by
us in various ways, for the purpose of studying our purchasing habits,
so that these corporations can promote and sell their products more
efficiently. This utilitarian, middle-class concern of the usual thinking
far underestimates the vast consequences which unbridled surveillance
actually poses. The danger of the digital surveillance and taking down
the barriers of individual privacy does not consist even of the potential
for using the gathered data to study the electoral attitudes and
influence elections. The problem gets on a completely different level
when the surveillance is used to shape the overall behavior and attitude
of each individual, the velvet-gloved but iron-handed “corrects” him if
he doesn’t comply with the party line. Now, this time “party line” really
means something serious. It is really a matter of life and death, not just a
matter which you could make fun of when in the past days you were
listening on the TV to the speeches of the party leaders and their
“parteigenossen” and “comrades”, which you could easily ignore and
go on minding your own business.
Under the new digital fascism regime of the “great reset”, the
“re-education” of the populace to follow the party line is unobtrusive
but inescapable. The extermination of unwanted elements is not done
by sending Gestapo in the middle of the night to make you and your
dissident voice disappear, or by having you board the freight train to
bring you to the concentration camp. Under the new, digitally-
enhanced fascism, you yourself jeopardize your own personal

279
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

well-being by allowing yourself not to keep up with the party line. The
database you yourself have created somewhere, existing completely
beyond your control, is assessed cold-bloodedly by the digital “stick and
carrot”-method algorithm, written to the taste of the elite. It is not even
necessary to be labeled “enemy of the people” if you dissent, because
you will soon feel that you are your own enemy if you do not comply.
You will yourself soon find out that it is entirely your own doing that
causes you pain and you have no choice but to change “Pavlov-dog
style” to what the system requires from you, otherwise you may even
meet with your premature death, inflicted by you yourself, as it were,
and by no one else—a suicide by external design.
Thus, if we are to end the story honestly, we must kill all that
was said so far. All the effort put into writing of the above pages was in
vain. At the end of the day, nothing that was said so far has any meaning
on the backdrop of what is awaiting us as humanity if the “great reset”
has its way. The easy implementation of the trivialities of the digital
technology over every single one of us, allowing centralized acquisition
and processing of most intimate personal details and inclinations of
everyone, allowing for immediate rating and generation of personal
social score, will make it disadvantageous to bother about figuring out
the truthfulness of the officially-imposed doctrines, even if you see the
lie in your face. Hasn’t this already happened with relativity—you can
immediately confirm with your own eyes, looking at the Addendum,
that relativity is a catastrophic lie, and yet you cannot do one thing
about it. Relativity will impudently keep persisting. It will go on
devastating society, not one bit unscratched and unblemished, cynically
defended by its sycophants and outright morons by saying that we
should look ahead and not dwell into what science has already adopted
as true. If such reactionaries, let alone dummies, had their way during
history, we would have had neither Copernicus, nor Galileo, nor
Lavoisier and the whole plethora of other heroes of science. The
Addendum teaches us also another important lesson—it is not the
personality or the biological traits of the person that matters. What
matters is the scientific quality of the claim, which one biological
subject such as Galileo is an emanation of a genius, while another
biological subject, such as the proposer of relativity, is an emanation of

280
  Conclusion 

intellectual disgrace.
Unfortunately, the above, which should go without saying, is
ignored, and what is truth is established by the elite, which has denied
everyone else who belongs to the outside multitude, to even think that
truth could be anything real or that it is anything outside of what you
are told by the elite it is. Notice the contradiction—you are forcefully
suppressed into thinking that there is no truth, while at the same time
elite tells you what is true, paradoxically admitting, after all, that there is
truth. You must comply with that “covenant”, even if you see with your
own eyes that what you are told is a blatant lie. On top of it, your
attempt to get that fact across to society will be heard by no one,
because, firstly, every commoner is conditioned to think, as said, that
truth does not exist and, secondly, even if truth does exist, as the elite
does admit, no commoner can do anything about it, especially if it goes
against the own existential interests of that commoner to bother about
truth. As was said, the cronies of the elite, the governments, establish
the criteria of what should be considered as truth, what is acceptable
and what is not, through its privately owned global mass media and
lately, adding to the global mass-media control, through the
automatically acting algorithms over which no individual has any
control, does not even know where these algorithms are located, who
programs them and what exactly they are.
Ergo, it will be against one’s personal interest to read books
such as this one, lowering one’s social rating, when it becomes known
sooner or later that an interest in this book has been expressed by you.
The ways to be grounded on this account are becoming easier by the
day. The “new normal” is on the road to achieving the total control of
everyone, to the extent no previous totalitarian attempt has even dreamt
of achieving—people will not even know who to direct their anger at, if
they ever dare to have unmonitored, personal-social-rating-score killer
anger. Your bad behavior such as reading books like this or buying
liquor instead of veggies, an action automatically registered in your
personal dossier somewhere out there, the minute you do the purchase
with your unencrypted digital money, will automatically put you in a
category which disables you from benefits, promotions, favors, alms or

281
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

what have you from the completely faceless authorities, who know
immediately, not only the status of your health before you know it, but
what you buy and what you feel and how you react to things and their
policies. Gathering such data and their analysis is achievable even by a
teenager as early as today, as we speak. It is as simple as contracting a
viral disease, so simple as the virus not even being a living organism, and
when the elite turns it into a governmental policy, and such individual
simple monitoring terminal is multiplied hundreds of millions of times,
obtaining the momentary picture of a nation becomes a piece of cake—
dissent is suppressed by cutting off centralized traceable digital money
supply, while good behavior causes the receipt of stimulus checks.
CONTROL THROUGH MONEY SUPPLY—BUT FOR
A GOOD CAUSE—In a way, quite paradoxically, in view of my
critical stance towards using traceable money supply to goad every non-
elite individual towards contributing to homogenization of society, that
ostensibly very similar method of using money-control, has actually
been proposed also by myself (cf. my book “Relativity is the Mother of
All Fake News” by following the link timeisabsolute.org).
The money-control which I am proposing as the only efficient
tool there is for the purpose, however, is applied for an obviously good
cause—the eradication of absurdities in science. Cancel the tax-money
which pays for the sustenance of pathological science centers dedicated
to the studies of relativity-absurdity, impossible to make any sense. This
is the only conceivable way of eradicating nonsense from science. I have
determined that academia is completely incapable of self-policing,
especially regarding this intellectual tragedy exemplified by relativity,
instead embracing it, causing academia and the entire underlying society
which academia is a part of, to be dragged down and to undergo
irreparable destruction for over a century. Therefore, I am proposing
such canceling of funding as the only efficient way to deal with that
menace, relativity, the flagship and the mother of all absurdities that
have ever globally invaded humanity. Severing the inflow of taxpayer
money into the ugly veins of the absurdity-laden contemporary science,

282
  Conclusion 

will make it so that very soon there will not be a trace of absurdity-based
science anywhere in the so-called learned world. This method of money-
engineering, as should be obvious, is proposed by this author for a goal
opposite to the suppressive, “great reset” totalitarian goals of the elite,
using marked-money-engineering, unencrypted, thus, privacy-deprived,
aimed at deepening and infinite perpetuation of the divide between the
minority of slavedrivers and the impoverished majority of slaves.
The digital fascism, however, soon wakes you up from the
above-described sweet dream of imagining that anyone would listen to
your noble proposal. The digital fascism wakes you up to the harsh
reality that rather than taking steps for restoring truth, the elite goes the
other way—who are you to criticize this or that or look for the truth, let
alone try to restore truth? Such task is not for you. If you have not
understood it thus far, there is a system of scores of social rating coming
in the form of the caveats of the “great reset”, bringing in the “new
normal”, which will put you in your place.
GLIMMER OF HOPE—The sad truth is that the elite spins
it, twists it through deceits of democracy and seemingness of
freedom, but in the end, inevitably puts you back in the straight jacket
of having no choice. This time, in the world of digital fascism,
doubling that restraint down.
On a much larger scale, the western elite created their little
Frankenstein, but that little Frankenstein grew up, and now he is going
to eat their ears. To prevent that, said elite tried using their hunveybin
sycophants to stage a coup d’état in China, but the central
government there apparently smashed that attempt. The Chinese
system of the central government is a sort of corporate fascism—it waits
for no one. It crushed the coup plotters, something that the central
government in the United States failed to do because of the nature of
the system and the whimps at the helm, and now we have to endure the
coup plotters’ misery for a while, because it is not possible for such a
nasty thing to last long, despite seeing the features proving the “great
reset” installment, favored by the coup-plotters, speeding up by the day.
We saw what happened with the previous variants of their totalitarian
systems—one did not last even ten years, while the other barely survived

283
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

seven decades. It is true that this time the elite got us, with its innovative
pseudo-pandemic impoverishment, making everyone fall into its
(elite’s) very real digital clutches. Furthermore, the bad news is, we don’t
have any time to lose, waiting for their deflation, as inevitable as it is.
Although the elite has already made the great mistake of revealing itself
and its real intentions, so the peoples of the world may stuff the grape
leaves of the elite, meaning, to twist the strings of that elite, sooner.
IMMUNE SYSTEM OF SOCIETY—The only hope
humanity has is for society to have a stronger immune system not to
allow the “great reset”, this time for-sure-humanly-induced ideological
pandemic. This intellectual pandemic is incomparable in its extent of
practical societal devastation, to anything known so far, except for the
global destruction of thinking by decimated science allowing absurdities
such as relativity to control it. Infecting science with the insanity of
relativity is the greatest pandemic of all, instrumental in the decimation
of thinking which characterizes all so-called modernity. The only hope
for humanity is for it to become determined to restore, prior to
anything else, the confidence in the reality of truth through overhaul of
science, decisively expelling from it absurdities such as relativity. As was
already emphasized, the first, immediately achievable goal, is to stop
funding of absurdities such as relativity and progeny. There are no
words to express how urgent the achievement of this goal is and how
much everything else pales in comparison.
This is the third book in which I am raising this most
important mandate of our time—the weaning from the udder of public
support the massive squandering of billions and billons of taxpayer
dollars, wasted to sustain relativity and progeny—the bad science of the
century and beyond.
The other two books are “Relativity is the Mother of All Fake
News” (can be read on the net by following the link: timeisabsolute.org)
and “The Pathology of Relativity and Some Notes on the Theory of
Science”.

284
 EPILOGUE
-

EQUALIZING EFFECT OF SPECIFICALLY COV-CRISIS

—The cov-crisis is an equalizer by design. That is not due to the fact that
we are all equal in the face of an imaginary disease. The cov-crisis is an
equalizer because it is a tipping point, the trigger, of several decades of
covert ideological societal swaying towards equalization within the
multitude, the multitude excluding the elite. The tendency towards
equalization now has reached the point of no return. In this sense, the cov-
crisis is indeed a “leveler” of the dependent part of society, this “leveler”
expected to be all the more discernible during the years which will follow
the cov-crisis. The design in the post cov-crisis world is aimed at protecting
the power and privilege of the elite by, as said, converting the somewhat
rich into less rich and the somewhat poor into less poor, thus,
homogenizing the governed part of society into a homogeneous state of
relative ubiquitous poverty, by no other means than by crude governmental
intervention. The latter was an example of equalization in financial sense,
but the design involves homogenization and reduction in every sense of
human existence. Below, given its overall importance, I will talk a little
more about this pivotal goal of the elite, which is just about the only thing,
as well as its repercussions, that we should worry about, because all the
efforts and all these pages that were written by “thegreatresetter”, have one
and only goal—to bring the world to reaching the maximum possible
homogeneity as soon as possible.
HOMOGENIZATION OF OUTER SOCIETY—THE GOAL
OF THE INNER ELITE—It is becoming more and more obvious that
the veil of apparent good intentions of the elite is becoming so raggedy that
it cannot any more conceal the real self-preserving goals of that elite, which
it was covertly promoting during the second half of the twentieth century,
predominantly using the channels of academia, the beehive of activists of
the new order, named the “great reset” in its latest edition. Those activists,
once thoroughly instructed, fly out into the various governmental
institutions, trying to rise in rank there and apply as political practice the
indoctrination in the equalization agenda received in academia. Apparently,

285
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

the elite in question, characterized only by exuberant wealth and led by

nothing else but selfish interest, is in such a panic, that it does not even
care any more if it openly confesses its real intentions in its official
documents. The western super-wealthy elite, microscopic in number,
intertwined with the monarchies, with speakers none other than the
Pope and the UN Secretary General, is so steamed underfoot, that its
only salvation is homogenization of the wider society, outside of the
elites, through the ultimate totalitarianism of the digital fascism. To this
end, everyone outside the microscopic elite, without exception, no left,
no right, politically speaking, is treated uniformly as a hardened
criminal. Any piece of data on you, which the most perfect totalitarian
system in history can get its hands on, is piled up somewhere in a forever
indelible database, so that a faceless algorithm, dumb but unmatchingly
laborious, can analyze your degree of obedience (your political
correctness, your social coefficient a.k.a. “social score”) to the main
purpose—homogenization and reduction of society. The
homogenizing of society consists in initially equalizing what is different
levels of achievement, thus removing the existing hierarchies in which
the multitude used to exist and eventually erasing those political, ethnic,
biological (real and imagined), religious, state and any other thinkable
differences that one might come up with. The “funny” purpose of the
tiny elite is to turn humanity into a jelly-like mass of low intelligence,
capable only of being a reproducer of goods and never a leader endowed
with creativity, a jelly-like mass, which that elite can shape not only to
its taste, but above all, so, that said tiny elite stays always on top,
privileged and powerful, while you and I, if we still understand that we
are alive, are below like slaves, subsisting under slavery such as no one in
history has ever dreamed of achieving. Now, I wonder if it needs more
explanation than that given in this book why this elite sounds more like
a bunch of lunatics, whose sweet dream in the long run is impossible to
come true, no matter what services of whatever secret and not so secret
agencies they decide to employ (of course, short-term, they can pretty
much poison our lives)?
It is so subtle, cunning and inescapable in its sick ingenuity,
that it is good to once more unravel a bit the dream of this elite, in

286
  Epilogue 

trying to prevent it from not being noticed. Thus, said homogenization

is intended to happen, according to the “great reset”, with the directing
hand of “helicopter money”, which, emphatically, is not the
Unconditional Basic Income (UBI) initiative, providing anonymity.
UBI is not in the plans of the elite for any of its “great reset” reforms.
Substantial reason for the elite’s deliberate ignoring it, is the inherent
quality of UBI to disconnect itself from the owner when the UBI is
being used, disallowing central monitoring and recording of what it is
spent for, which would connect it to the owner of the UBI. By the end
of 2030 the money which the elite really needs to be in exchange, is
necessarily non-fiat, non-bitcoin, non-anonymized unencrypted digital
money, which the governors, the elite, through the governments they
put in place, connects exactly with you without delay; at that, without
even dealing directly with you. There is an algorithm, and, by making
every single step in life, you yourself are building your own destiny. You
yourself are amassing your own facts about you, building your own
police-like dossier file, which determines, by feedback, how much
directly traceable “free” money the helicopter should dump on you. If
you don’t obey the homogenization agenda, you won’t get the money,
and you’ll die. So, there is no open dictatorship or oppression. Neither
is there a real person or a known group of people, physically suppressing
you, to make you go out in the street in protest. What, are you going to
protest against—algorithms? “No, no, I’m going to protest against
those who have created and run the algorithms.” Really? Oh, and, who
are they? Do you know, for example, who exactly has slapped the buggy
code of the software you are using, to go and protest against him?
“Come on, that software is privately owned and you know its owner ...
albeit to no avail”. Also, pray tell, how are you going to take down the
elite, not even knowing who exactly this elite really is?
CORRECTING THE FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICS
—THE BEGINNING OF THE ROAD TO FREEDOM—Indeed,
one doesn’t even know who exactly this elite really is, although, lately,
the elite in question has been sacrificing some of its visible members,
putting them up for public scrutiny, to let off steam by allowing the
public to beat them up like rubber dolls with the public’s baseball bat of

287
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

anger ... and that ends there. Head-on confronting being impossible, the
only hope is that these elite faux-messiahs will get off our backs by the
natural course of events—no, no, I don’t wish them their personal
demise, God forbid, but the natural global social processes are far more
multi-faceted than this tiny super-wealthy elite actually realizes, rather,
has the ability to realize, in order to have the immortality of elite’s
standing guaranteed. It is hoped that their progeny at least, will come to
realize that fact, surprised by a world much more complex than they
figure it out to be.
Now comes the moment, after we touched on the cognitive
abilities of those who have taken upon themselves to “improve” the
world, to say nothing about their real goal—twisting the world into
changing to their ends—to emphasize the main tenor of this book. It is
not possible to solve any problems in a quality way, least of all global
problems, while the world being in the current situation of rampant
corruption in science and its abandonment by the elite-installed world
governments, by further allowing the undisturbed spreading of said
governments’ tolerance towards absurdities, funding them generously
on top of it. The evil special case, made known as the “great reset”,
talked about in this book, intended to finally enslave us, is just an
illustration of how urgent it is to regain our sanity and demand that our
governments become enlightened, really elected by the people, and thus
begin acting responsibly, begin respecting truth, hence, not keep
spending any more of our hard-earned tax money on absurdities such as
relativity and progeny, falsely foisted as science. The absolute truth
regarding the most important underlying question of humanity—the
absolute nature of time and space—now that we know it unequivocally,
laid out in the Addendum to this book for all to see, is what will make
us free, as is the old saying that “truth will make us free”, now really
acquiring its true content.
This book began and now is ending with the real emphasis on
the need, crying out, for the restoration of truth, especially by looking
for unequivocal truths. A crucial example of an absolute truth is
presented, of the pivotal problem of the world, relativity, whereby the
proof of a question of such global significance is reduced to the greatest

288
  Epilogue 

possible democratic level it can reach (cf. Addendum). Modern

democracy must be understood only in this way—creating of
conditions for the unhindered dissemination of absolute truths,
allowing people to personally understand rigorously even the seemingly
most mundane problems, especially when these problems are of global
import and the people are sinisterly goaded to spend their hard earned
tax dollar on such sheer nonsense. It must grasp a deep hold in society
that truth, reached through the only possible way—the un-corrupted
science and nothing else, under conditions whereby the un-corrupted
science is allowed free and proper dissemination—is the real liberator of
humanity. Thus, humanity should aim at first to reach scientific truths,
starting with the unequivocal truth about the absurdity of relativity,
which can be understood personally by practically every individual
comprising humanity, should humanity be serious in its desire to really
solve its problems and survive.
This straightened out thinking, recognizing the reality of truth,
in principle, and basing itself on truths, which every member of society
of average intellect can understand personally, will enable people to
more promptly recognize the mortal threats incorporated in ideas such
as the “great reset”, aimed at depriving humanity of its freedom and real
progress, to the sick advantage of a select super-wealthy few.
Thus, we cannot add anything more important to the above
but repeat that, in order to speed up that natural process of social revival
of removing the noose of totalitarian oppression, the first thing we need
to do is restore the approach toward truth. We must reclaim its standing
in society, especially through a decisive overhaul of science, cleaning and
freeing science from the depositions of a whole century of torture by
absurdities epitomized by relativity, impudently imposed on the world
as genius science, as faux as it gets. This corrected science, contrary to
the evil intentions of the elite, must immediately be implemented in our
educational system to stop the dumbing down of our youth and
poisoning the minds of children. As became clear from this book, that
dumbing down and poisoning is deliberately designed by the overly-
wealthy elites with the goal to create obedient, docile humanity of very
narrow abilities and intelligence, capable of performing only simple

289
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

targeted tasks, a humanity incapable of complex cognition, which will

not even be capable of understanding the slavery it is placed under, and
therefore will never rebel against the rule of that elite. Therefore,
disabling, through the power of truth, the elite from implementing of
these evil intentions of the elite, must be the existential goal of
humanity, a matter of life and death.
The healing of societal problems is a difficult task, no doubt
about it. However, the beginning of this healing must start with
straightening out science and its fundamentals, disallowing absurdities
to ambush science. This, on its part, is not difficult. On the contrary, it
is very easy and can be done at once if the unequivocal proof shown in
the Addendum is honored by a strong political will. This will usher in
the restoration of truth, logic and reason, which will then be the basis of
any future proper development of society capable of breaking the
chains of any elite trying to enslave it.

290
 ADDENDUM
 Relativity—Symbol of the Demise of Science 

Let us not wait any longer and “prendre la balle au bond”. It should
require a very slight effort. Once seen, this tragic drama of science can
never be unseen.
Suffice it to take a look at pages 61 and 62 (in the English
translation) of the founding 1905 relativity paper

291
  Relativity—Symbol of the Demise of Science 

The catastrophe is seen instantly:

1) One single law of motion, referred to coordinate system denoted by

the lower case letter k, for one single body in that coordinate system k,
is expressed by one single, unique equation.

It is crucial to notice that the coordinate system k is in uniform translatory motion

with respect to coordinate system K and, therefore, respectively, coordinate system K
is in uniform translatory motion with respect to coordinate system k. Recall, uniform
translatory motion is motion at constant velocity; motion without acceleration; it is
the state of an inertial system; it is akin to rest. Again, never forget that coordinate
systems k and K are in uniform translatory motion, even though the author of
relativity deceptively implies, in stark contradiction with the principle of relativity, that
uniform translatory motion and rest are two different states. More on this deception
is talked about later in the text.

2) On the contrary, the same law of motion referred to coordinate

system K (left-side system of equations) becomes, instead, a different
law of motion (right-side system of equations resulting from application
of the Lorentz transformations), again referred to the same system K,
for the same body, at the same time.

Absolutely astounding in its brazen absurdity, mocking the

most elementary requirements of science, relativity insolently ends up
“deriving” the impossible; namely, that the observed one single body in
this one single coordinate system K, obeys two different laws of motion
at the same time—one law, containing velocity (right-side system of
equations referred to coordinate system K), and at the same time
another law, not containing velocity (left-side system of equations
referred to the same coordinate system K). Nothing more need be said.
Relativity must be rejected, removed from science and all public funding
and support of relativity must be cancelled.

Some, however, may be interested in the technology of coming up with such

blatant nonsense.

292
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

In order to understand the technology of this travesty, notice what the author
of relativity has actually done here. He has taken the incorrect equalities which he has
“derived” in §6 and has written them here in §10 , in the lower row of equations in the
rectangle, as if they are correct equalities (below, under the next figure, it is explained in
detail why these equalities are incorrect). In addition to these incorrect equalities, which,
as seen in §6, are the victims of the Lorentz transformations, the author of relativity also
uses the incorrect (wrongly expressing equality between a constant and a variable)
Lorentz transformations themselves—the ultimate culprit for the catastrophe of
relativity, the violators of the defining principle of relativity—written as the upper row in
the rectangle . As a result of applying these two rows of incorrect equalities, the author
of relativity obtains a different law of motion in K (right-side system of equations) for the
same body, for which he has already shown what its law of motion in this same system
K, is, at the very same time (left-side system of equations). Thus, what the author of
relativity has derived is the outright impossibility that one and the same body in one
and the same coordinate system K obeys two different laws of motion at the same time.
This is a brazen absurdity, offensive to the intelligence of the reader, to whom the fact
that one body in one coordinate system always obeys only one law of motion at any
given time, is as trivial as any absolute truth, that can in no way be the subject of any
critical discourse, least of all in science.
Below, one can see more discussion on the deception used, in order to appear
that the observed “derivation” is legitimate. The deception used is to make the reader
forget Galileo's discovery that uniform translatory motion is akin to rest and remain
with the false impression that these states (rest and uniform translatory motion) are
different. According to Galileo's discovery, the left side and the right side systems of
equations referring to K in pages 61 and 62 in §10 (cf. ) must concern one single state of
the electron and therefore must not differ, as they do in the pages shown. The author,
however, deceptively, treats these two systems of equations as if they express two
different states of the electron; namely, the left side system of equations referring to an
electron at rest, while the right side system of equations referring to an electron in
motion. This is clearly wrong.

REMOVAL OF RELATIVITY FROM PHYSICS IS INEVITABLE—

The fact that relativity derives the absurdity that one and the same body
in one and the same coordinate system K obeys two different laws of
motion at the same time, catastrophically invalidates relativity in its
entirety right here, in the pages shown. This is a disgrace, which needs
immediate attention, especially by the funding agencies, mandating their
prompt freezing of all support to any proposal, having anything to do
with this absurdity, going by the name “theory” of relativity.
Furthermore, and this should be said most emphatically, it can
clearly be seen above, the absurdity of said “theory” of relativity arrives
from the application of the non-physical Lorentz transformations.
Therefore, this disgrace, which needs the immediate attention of the
funding agencies for freezing their support, has even more general
repercussions and includes every other possible Lorentz
transformations contaminated activity, wrongly presented as science.

293
  Relativity—Symbol of the Demise of Science 

This inconspicuous looking derivation, as if popping up in the

middle of other things that may appear more substantial, is, in fact,
exactly the opposite. It is not only the greatest absurdity science has
ever seen in its entire existence, but it constitutes the crooked pivot,
the ailment of the cuticle, the defective quick, that maladroitly
holds together the whole insidious edifice of contemporary
physics. This problem, which one may not pay attention to even
when seeing it, especially if brainwashed that relativity is absolutely
impeccable, is in fact the defective core of the forcefully imposed
fake genius science, going by the name of “theory” of relativity.
Despite the misleading seemingness that there may be other, more
important sections of the theory, dwarfing this as a mere
correctable glitch, this singular discrepancy, hiding in the sea of
formulae and words, smoked out and shown here for the whole
world to see, is actually an unmatched dramatic scientific
catastrophe of proportions far outweighing any other thinkable
problem in the history of science. Once this catastrophic fact is
found, nothing else, no matter how elevated and learned it may seem
when flipping the pages of the so-called “theory” and progeny, no
matter how complex the rest of the formulae appear, makes
absolutely no sense. Moreover, it has far-reaching consequences, not
only for science, but also for society as a whole.
UNDERSTANDING THE ARGUMENT IS CRUCIAL—
Therefore, it is of utmost importance that this catastrophe be
understood well, so as to sink deep in the consciousness of every
thinking individual as a red flag and a precaution against any attempt
for this travesty of science to be mitigated and thus allowed to persist
in science. This is a drastic, absolutely incurable catastrophic
deficiency in one of the most celebrated theories in the history of
science. Freeing science from it is of singular significance to the
world, on par, if not of greater significance, than the defeat of
geocentrism by heliocentrism. The shown calamitous clash of the
Lorentz transformations with physical reality, provides a final answer
to what caused the destruction of the most basic notions of science
—time and space. The Lorentz transformations are the culprit that
gives rise to the insanity, occupying science for over a century,

294
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

claiming that space can be curved and time can have a different rate,
depending on the coordinate system in which it is measured. Now, with
the above proof, of catastrophic magnitude for relativity, unequivocally
confirming that application of the Lorentz transformations leads to fatal
disagreement with reality, the correct understanding that Euclidean
space is the only real physical space and that time runs at the same rate,
independent of the coordinate system in which it is measured, marks its
unquestionable, final triumph.
Therefore, it is very important for one to spare some negligible
amount of time and effort, in order to understand and appreciate the
significance for all physics of the above-shown seemingly very small
detail, a detail as if buried amongst other more important stuff, but, in
fact, a seeming detail, deciding the fate of a major part of contemporary
physics, a finding of such impact that no further development of physics
is possible without a major overhaul centered around that ostensibly
tenuous, but actually singularly dramatic discovery.
BEING ABSURDITY, RELATIVITY IS INHERENTLY NOT
TESTABLE—Relativity in effect derives that one equals two , which,
being absurdity, is also a derivation which no experiment can prove—
there can never be any experiment whatsoever that can confirm such a
thing.
There may be insane experimenters, who might be obsessed
with proving experimentally that one equals two, as relativity in effect
derives, thus, attempting to prove the unprovable; that is, to prove the
validity of relativity. Need it be said, that these insane experimenters will
arrive nowhere in their efforts? Their pursuit is doomed from the get-
go. The above proof of the catastrophic problem in relativity must put a
stop to any attempt, let alone public funding, at any hallucinatory ideas
and dreams for experimental testing of relativity and progeny.
GENERALIZATION OF THE ABOVE—To repeat, what is
shown here, is one of the most brazen absurdities science has ever seen
in its history. At that, it has been insidiously promulgated to incredible
prominence as the work of genius, stimulating further barren activities,
which, for their part, generate a barrage of “fake news” in the media.

295
  Relativity—Symbol of the Demise of Science 

Relativity is the mother of all this “fake news”, leading further down the line to
generating a plethora of incredible “fake news” in the social sciences, avidly
appropriated by society at large. Every other “fake news” with which society is
bombarded, has in its heart of hearts the destroyed thinking of relativity,
endorsed by the highest societal authority there is pertaining to matters of the
mind, academia. The mess generated by this initial kernel of inanity, but coming
from what the population perceives as the stalwart of truth; i.e., academia, has
no limits and spreads like wildfire.
What was shown is enough to obliterate relativity in its entirety. The
discovered catastrophic absurdity, presented above, proves that relativity
invalidates itself without any need for further testing for validity. Clearly, anyone
who claims to have evidence that one body in one system can obey two
different laws of motion at the same time, as relativity derives, and therefore has
confirmed relativity, is a charlatan.
Once again, it should not be forgotten that the culprit for the above
catastrophe is the construct known as Lorentz transformations. In addition to
being physically inconsistent, two of the four equations comprising Lorentz
transformations (cf. the first row in the rectangle drawn on page 62) are
mathematically incorrect because they express equalities between a constant and
a variable. It is seen that constants expressing position and time in a given,
observed, coordinate system, having nothing to do with velocity v of another
coordinate system, external to the observed coordinate system, are made equal
to variables which are functions of velocity v (cf. the first row in the rectangle
drawn on page 62). Thus, it is true that, even prior to their application, it can be
seen right away that the Lorentz transformations equate a constant to a variable
(more on this also later in the chapter), which makes them also mathematically
incorrect, in addition to their lack of physical meaning. One can stop right
there, outright rejecting anything that is based on these transformations,
relativity included. Parsing relativity, the way it is done here, however, is the
easiest, yet rigorous, in-your-face way to demonstrate the non-physicality of the
Lorentz transformations, unmatched in its promptness and categorical finality
by any viable argument debunking relativity known to date.
SOME MORE “ENTERTAINING” CATASTROPHES—The
willingness of the author of relativity to capitalize on the clear absurdity
brought about by the Lorentz transformations is stunning. Thus, some may like
to entertain themselves a little more with this incredibly low-quality thinking,
elevated to the skies as the ultimate creation of a genius. On pages 52 and 53,
the author will not blink an eye when he derives exactly the opposite of what he
pontificates.

296
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

Indeed, “[e]vidently the two systems of equations found for

system k must express exactly the same thing”, says the author of
relativity. However, it is seen most clearly that the two systems of
equations found by the author of relativity for system k unambiguously
do not express the same thing at all—the most glaring difference is that
the left-side system of equations found for system k contains velocity v,
while the right-side system of equations, also found for system k, does
not contain velocity.
Neither is it true that “ ... both systems of equations are
equivalent to the Maxwell-Hertz equations for system K”. This
fraudulent statement is made by the author of relativity with the
deceptive intention to use it as justification of the false statement in the
first part of the sentence; namely, that “the two systems of equations
found for system k” express exactly the same thing. However, the left-
side system of equations of these “ ... both systems of equations” found
for system k, is obviously not equivalent to “the Maxwell-Hertz
equations for system K” seen on top of page 52. The most important
difference is that the left-side system of equations found for system k
contains velocity, while the “the Maxwell-Hertz equations for system K”
seen on top of page 52, do not contain velocity v.

297
  Relativity—Symbol of the Demise of Science 

The author of relativity minds not these clear facts and goes ahead with
what he has connivingly pronounced as equal.
As a result, he makes equal two unequal quantities—one a function of
velocity, the other not a function of velocity v (cf. the bottom system of
equations on page 53; the author illegitimately uses these wrong equalities
further in §10)—and in this way he thinks he has achieved a great derivation the
world has never seen before. He looks you straight in the eye and lies, as if lying
like that is what great science is. Clearly, things are so twisted that now the
whole world is conditioned to think that doing great science is to lie, and is
ready to pay generously for that lie. If the excuse is that the lie was so
elaborately done that this offense to the intellect of the reader has not been
known, now we do know. The question is, what are we going to do about it?
WHAT DOES THE VERY DEFINITION OF THE “THEORY”
OF RELATIVITY—THE PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY—SAY?—Maybe
it will not hurt to show the explicit statement made by the author of relativity,
which in reality is Galileo's discovery, known as the principle of relativity,
without the author of relativity feeling the need to give credit to Galileo;
namely, that uniform translatory motion is akin to rest; that is, that when the
motion is uniform and translatory, the physical laws are not affected when
referred to the one or the other of two coordinate systems in uniform
translatory motion (incidentally, exactly the way these equations are not affected
when the two systems are at rest). Here it is, written in black and white on page
41

298
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

And, yet, as seen on page 62, shown here deliberately side by side with
page 41, the author of relativity nonchalantly violates what he himself has
set to be the definition of his theory. The Lorentz transformations used
on page 62 to refer the physical law to system K, affect that physical law,
in brazen contradiction to the definition seen on page 41.
To see this illegitimate affecting of the law, the reader does not
even need to know what exact law that is. This blatant discrepancy can be
seen by anyone. No need to be a scientist or some great sage, to be able
to see with one's own eyes this difference, in violation of the definition of
the theory.

A Benign Exercise, Not Requiring Great Effort

Although overexplaining sometimes may cause more harm than good, especially in the
case presented here, whereby what has already been shown suffices for a categorical
unequivocal overthrowing of relativity and all Lorentz-transformations-based theories,
never to be heard from again, some may find more explanation useful. Here is an
exercise to further convince oneself, in even more concrete technical terms, of the
outrageously brazen presenting of relativity as something which is nothing other than
sheer nonsense. This exercise is geared specifically toward those more inquisitive
readers who have not had the chance to study maths in slightly more depth, especially
those who have not taken calculus. Clearly, this detailed explanation could be skipped.
It is obvious to those who have had some exposure to maths.
Let us begin. The crucial criterion for relativity to make sense is for it to abide
by its first postulate, a.k.a. the principle of relativity. It is crucial, because the principle of
relativity (a.k.a. the first postulate) is the very definition of the “theory” of relativity.
Notice, that there are three equivalent terms expressing the basis of the “theory” of
relativity; namely, principle of relativity, first postulate or definition of the “theory” of
relativity. These three terms can be used interchangeably. The principle of relativity, as
also explained in another part of the book, reflects the crucial discovery by Galileo that,
contrary to what Aristotle thought, there is one special type of motion, which, curiously,
is not motion at all. This special type of motion is called uniform translatory motion
(motion at constant velocity; motion without acceleration; the state of an inertial
system). Therefore, most notably, uniform translatory motion is akin to rest, despite the
word “motion”, present in its name. This type of motion is not operative; that is, it
cannot be felt, neither can it be detected by any physical experiment. Thus, if two
coordinate systems are in uniform translatory motion, any physical law referred to
(written in; seen from) one of the systems, is not affected, if this same physical law is
referred to (written in; seen from) the other of these two systems in uniform translatory
motion—when a coordinate system is in uniform translatory motion with respect to
another coordinate system; that is, when the coordinate system is an inertial system,
there is, as said, no physical experiment that can be performed that would indicate if
that system is moving or is at rest with respect to the other coordinate system. These
two coordinate systems, being in that particular state of motion with respect to each
other, behave as if they are at rest with each other. Hence, the principle of relativity—
what is in one of these systems is exactly the same in the other system. Thus, relativity is
oneness, identicalness, and does not depend on the point of view; that is, it does not

299
  Relativity—Symbol of the Demise of Science 

depend on which of the two systems we would choose from which to do the viewing.
Some people incorrectly interpret relativity to mean the opposite; that is, to mean that
what the physical law would look like depends on the point of view; that is, from what
coordinate system one views the physical law, affects the physical law. The uniformity,
the oneness explained, is given the compact name, principle of relativity. This
misunderstanding has given rise to the popular misnomer “everything is relative”,
allegedly coming from relativity, but, in fact, misinterpreting it.
From the above, it follows that if there were a physical law, which we need to
study, as the law under study in pages 61 and 62, then this law must not be affected, as
required by the principle of relativity, both when referred to (seen from, written in) the
one, the coordinate system k, and when referred to (seen from, written in) the other, the
coordinate system K, of the two coordinate systems in uniform translatory motion.
The easiest way to ascertain that the law under study is not affected when
referred to the one or the other of the two coordinate systems, and that, therefore,
everything that was done is in compliance with the defining principle of relativity,
without even the need to know what exactly this physical law is, is to count the number
of physical quantities in the equation representing the law being referred to the one of
the two systems, and then see if that number of these same physical quantities
corresponds to the number of the physical quantities in the equation referred to the
other coordinate system. Clearly, to obey the principle of relativity, these two counted
numbers must be equal.
Suddenly, it may seem complicated, but if one has patience, one will soon see
that the counting and comparing is no more difficult than playing with an abacus,
which, in fact, is more complicated.
Thus, count the quantities observed in the first row of the system of equations
shown on page 61—the equation enclosed by an ellipse. One sees mass m, position x,
time t, charge of the electron ε and the x-axis component of the electric field X. These
are five components, right? Some may say, wait a minute, one also sees d/d. This is not
a physical quantity but is a mathematical symbol, indicating a mathematical operation.
Without going much into calculus, because the argument at hand can be understood
without having the slightest clue about calculus, it will be mentioned that in this case
the mathematical symbol is a part of the second derivative of x over t. What is of
concern to us here is that the number of physical quantities in the equation observed, is
five.
As is seen on top of page 62, five is also the number of the physical quantities
in the first row—the equation also circled in ellipse—of the system of equations referred
to (written in; viewed from) k. The only difference is that some of the five physical
quantities are denoted by a different letter. Thus, while mass m and charge of the
electron ε have retained the same notation (mass and charge are not coordinates,
subject to transformation when referring a physical law to one or another of the two
coordinate systems in uniform translatory motion), the position x has become ξ, time t
has become τ and the x-axis component of the electric field X has become X'. This
change of notation, however, is to be expected, because the physical law is not referred
to system K but this time is referred to coordinate system denoted by lower case k—the
coordinates in different coordinate systems are named (denoted) differently, but they
retain their meaning of spatial and temporal coordinates. Therefore, the two equations
are not affected due to the change of coordinates. These two equations comprise the
same equation written in different coordinate systems with their respective coordinates.
Now, what was seen, is the correct way of writing in k and K the physical law
under consideration. This is commonplace, because it is done according to the principle
of relativity, requiring that the physical law is not affected; that is, requiring that at least
the number of physical quantities stays the same, when the two coordinate systems k
and K are in uniform translatory motion, as these coordinate systems are. In writing

300
  Vesselin C. Noninski 

these two systems of equations, although correct, the author has achieved nothing, and
he should have ended his attempt at creating a new theory right here. It is the only way
the law can be referred to k and K and that one and only way is known since the times
of Galileo. It is trivial. Triviality comprises no new theory, and there is no alternate way
to refer physical law to k and K other than what was already done.
However, in his desire to make a discovery at any rate, even at the expense of
being completely ridiculous and absurd, the author of relativity carries out an
illegitimate referring of the studied physical law to coordinate system K by using an
illegitimate alternate way; namely, by using the Lorentz transformations, which are, in
addition, mathematically incorrect to begin with—prior to their application in any
theory, the Lorentz transformations themselves constitute, in fact, an impossible
equality between a constant and a variable.
By using the Lorentz transformations, the author brazenly violates the very
fundamental definition of his own “theory” of relativity; namely, the principle of
relativity, the latter requiring, as strongly emphasized, that the physical law is not
affected when referred to the observed k and K.
Indeed, in order to convince yourself that the principle of relativity has been
violated as a result of applying the Lorentz transformations, count the parameters, in
the very same way as above. In doing so, one reconfirms that the number of physical
quantities in the first row of the system of equations at top of page 62—the equation
also enclosed by an ellipse—is five. This was done already. However, the first row of the
system of equations seen in the lower part of page 62—the equation enclosed by an
ellipse—contains two more parameters—one of them is velocity , as well as speed of
light c, which are part of the coefficient .

Therefore, after application of the Lorentz transformations, the number of physical

quantities in the same law, referred to the same coordinate system K, now is seven and
not five. The Lorentz transformations have illegitimately affected the physical law when
it is referred to coordinate system K. This affecting of the law is a catastrophic violation
of the principle of relativity, a principle which is adopted as defining the entire “theory”
of relativity. The principle of relativity, adopted as the definition of the “theory” of
relativity, mandates that the physical law is not affected upon referring it to coordinate
system k and coordinate system K; that is, the principle of relativity mandates that at
least the number of the physical quantities should stay the same, which it does not after
applying the Lorentz transformations for the purpose of referring the studied physical
law to coordinate system K.
As seen, the catastrophe in relativity shows itself in two ways. This is a double
catastrophe. First, it is clearly seen that the Lorentz transformations catastrophically
violate the principle of relativity. This is enough for the “theory” of relativity to be
removed entirely from physics. Over and above this drastic catastrophe, one sees that
relativity derives that one body in one coordinate system, coordinate system K, obeys
two different laws of motion at the same time—one law having five physical quantities
and a completely different law containing seven physical quantities, both laws
describing the motion of one single body at the same time. This is an absurdity. One
body in one system can obey only one single law of motion at any given time and cannot
obey two different laws of motion at the same time, as the absurd relativity derives. This
second catastrophic absurdity, likewise, is enough, only in its own right, to invalidate
relativity in its entirety. Relativity is so blocked and destroyed by invalidating itself that
one feels astounded by the magnitude with which that easily discernable catastrophe
has been overlooked, allowing this unprecedented absurdity to take over the world,
foisting itself on the world as the work of genius.

301
  Relativity—Symbol of the Demise of Science 

A Detail Revealing Deception as a Method of Derivation

In the observed case regarding pages 61 and 62, both systems of coordinates, both k
and K, are without any doubt in uniform translatory motion. Indeed, it is impossible to
obtain, as has been done in the paper, the system of equations in coordinate system k, a
system which is explicitly stated to be in uniform translatory motion (it is explicitly stated that k
has velocity with respect to K and that velocity is constant—indeed, one reads, “the electron, at the moment when we
give it our attention, is at the origin of the co-ordinates, and moves with the velocity along the axis of X in the system
K”) and not have system K also be in relative translatory motion with respect to k. Thus,
the author's conditional statement “[i]f the electron is at rest at a given epoch” in K, is a
manipulation (the pseudo-scientific lingo using “epoch” and “ensues in the next instant in
time” notwithstanding). Such separation of rest from uniform translatory motion is a
deception. It is immaterial whether K is at rest or is in uniform translatory motion with
respect to k, because uniform translatory motion is akin to rest according to the
principle of relativity discovered centuries ago by Galileo.
It is quite clear why the author of the bogus relativity has had the nerve to rely
on such a brazen deception. If the reader falls for the deception and agrees that rest
differs from uniform translatory motion, then the bottom system of equations on page
62, written also for K, would seem to refer to a system K in a different state from the
state in which system K was when the system of equations on page 61 was written, and,
therefore, any difference in the law referring to K in these two different states of K would
seem justified—the electron in K would then seem to be in two different states and,
therefore, would obey two different laws of motion. However, according to the principle
of relativity, K at rest with k, and K in relative translatory motion with respect to k, is in
exactly the same state. According to the principle of relativity, uniform translatory
motion is akin to rest. No physical law referred to (written in, seen from) k is affected
when this same law is referred to (written in, seen from) K, independent of whether K is
at rest with k or K is in uniform translatory motion with respect to k.
Doing science by deception, as the “genius” does, is what the world expects
today and pays for it generously. No one is seen to object to that, least of all the highly
positioned politicians governing the distribution of people's money.
Of course, we do not need to even talk about this reprehensible deception,
because relativity crashes irreparably as early as the first application of the Lorentz
transformations—it is seen on page 62, as well as on page 52, that after the application
of the Lorentz transformations, the observed physical laws are affected. This affecting of
the laws is in catastrophic contradiction with the principle of relativity, inevitably
adopted, in its being an absolute truth, as the definition of the “theory” of relativity put
forth.

A Useful Mnemonic
By the way, when thinking about relativity, the absurdity of relativity should immediately
appear as a simple mental picture, as the shown forking figure with pages 61 and 62
back to back. I have specially drawn double arrows, showing right away that what is one
single system of equations referring to (corresponding to, written in, seen from) the
coordinate system denoted by lower case k, becomes two different equations referring to
(corresponding to, written in, seen from) the coordinate system denoted by upper case K.
This is impossible. It is an absurdity because everything that is talked about and done in
pages 61 and 62 refers to just one body, at one given moment; namely, the moment one
gives it one's attention—one body in one system can obey only one law of motion, and
not two different laws of motion, at the moment one gives it one's attention. To derive
that one body in one system obeys two different laws of motion at the same time, as
relativity derives, is a glaring absurdity.

302
  References 

1. http://voiceofreasoninthedesert.org/ ItalyInfluenza.pdf,
Investigating the impact of influenza on excess mortality
in all ages in Italy during recent seasons
(2013/14–2016/17 seasons Intl. J. Infectious Diseases, 88
(2019).
2. https://www.nsi.bg/en/content/18162/basic-page/deaths-
bulgaria weeks, Deaths in Bulgaria by Weeks National
Statistical Institute.
3. https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Weekly-Counts-of-Deaths-
by-State-and
Select-Causes/3yf8-kanr, Weekly Counts of Deaths by
State and Select Causes, 2014-2018 Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
4. https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Weekly-Counts-of-Deaths-
by-State-and
Select-Causes/muzy-jte6, Weekly Counts of Deaths by
State and Select Causes, 2019-2020 Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
5. https://www.destatis.de/EN/Press/ 2020/06/
PE20_203_12621.html, Statistisches Bundesamt.
6. http://pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/fi/, Statistics Finland’s
PxWeb Databases.
7. https://www.ssb.no/en/statbank/table/ 07995/, Statistisk
sentralbyrå.
8. https://www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and maps,
EUROMOMO.

303
The absurdity of relativity, as pathological as it is, shockingly, is the
destroyed common ground of all ideologies. This is the rotten core
where all ideologies coalesce and because relativity is absurd, the
coalescing ideologies are, at their very basis, absurd. This is an extremely
important fact to notice.

How can anyone trust a government which ignores the absolutely

unequivocal proof presented in the Addendum, ignoring which leads to
squandering taxpayers’ money, yours and mine, and, at the same time,
emphasizes uncertain issues which serve elite’s agenda, such as
anthropogenic climate change and media-created panic about cov-
pandemic?