0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views

Participle Clauses

The document discusses participle clauses, which provide additional information similar to relative clauses. Participle clauses use participles like "wearing" or "stolen" in place of relative pronouns. They can use present participles like "-ing" for active meanings or past participles like "-ed" for passive meanings. Both participle clauses and relative clauses are grammatically correct, with participle clauses being more common in formal written English.

Uploaded by

maladjusted97
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
39 views

Participle Clauses

The document discusses participle clauses, which provide additional information similar to relative clauses. Participle clauses use participles like "wearing" or "stolen" in place of relative pronouns. They can use present participles like "-ing" for active meanings or past participles like "-ed" for passive meanings. Both participle clauses and relative clauses are grammatically correct, with participle clauses being more common in formal written English.

Uploaded by

maladjusted97
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Participle clauses

Participle clauses
Participle clauses are a bit like relative clauses they give us more information.

y y

People wearing carnival costumes filled the streets of Rio de Janeiro. The paintings stolen from the National Gallery last week have been found. The participle clauses (wearing and stolen .) act like relative clauses. We could say:

y y

People who were wearing carnival costumes filled the streets of Rio de Janeiro. The paintings which were stolen from the National Gallery last week have been found. With the Past Participle

y y

A pair of shoes worn by Marilyn Monroe have been sold for fifty thousand dollars. Trees blown down in last nights storms are being removed this morning. We use the past participle blown in the last example but the ending -ed is used in regular verbs when the meaning is passive. With the Present Participle

y y

A woman carrying a bright green parrot walked into the room. A man holding a gun shouted at us to lie down. We use the present participle - the -ing form to form the participle clause when the meaning is active. Notice that the participle clauses with the present participle have a continuous meaning. If we replaced them with a relative clause it would be in a continuous tense.

A man holding a gun has the same meaning as A man who was holding a gun. We cant make a participle clause with a present participle when the meaning is not continuous.

y y

The woman living next door is on holiday. The woman who lives next door is on holiday.

participial or relative clause?

Tamas Hoczat from Hungary writes: Im learning about relative clauses. Ive got two sentences: y y At the end of the street there is a path leading to the river. At the end of the street there is a path that leads to the river. Are both of them correct? Which one should I use? Thank you for helping me. Roger replies: more questions

Both are perfectly correct and sound perfectly natural in this example, so use either or both. Generally speaking, theparticipial clause, starting with -ing or -ed, is more characteristic of written English, as it allows us to say the same thing as a relative clause, starting with who, which or that, but with fewer words. Participial clauses are also frequently heard in radio and TV news broadcasts (as well as newspaper articles and reports) as they permit a lot of information to be compressed into a limited amount of time. This is one reason why they are often difficult for a learner of English to follow. The reporting of The Great Train Robber Ronnie Biggs arrival back in the UK a couple of weeks ago as he stepped off the plane after 35 years on the run in Australia and Brazil was reported as follows: "The only glimpse of Biggs, dressed in blue shirt and green sweater, lasted only a few seconds. Lawyers acting for Biggshave said they will seek a hearing before the Court of Appeal". A participial clause, starting with ed or past participle, is used instead of a relative pronoun plus passive voice. Study these further examples: y y y Food sold (= which is sold) in this supermarket is of the highest quality. Anyone found touching (= who is found ) these priceless exhibits will be escorted out of the museum. The tailback on the A34 caused ( = which was caused / which had been caused) by the head-on collisionstretched for over 20 miles in both directions. It took the ambulances called ( = that were called / that had been called) to the scene over half an hour to get through.

A participial clause, starting with -ing is used instead of a relative pronoun plus active verb, continuous or simple. y y The train now arriving (= which is now arriving) at platform 1 is the 6.36 from Newcastle. There are delays for people travelling to work (= who are travelling to work) on Southern Region trains this morning. Anyone touching (= who touches ) these priceless exhibits will be escorted out of the museum. The police impounded all the vehicles belonging to (= which belonged to) his brother. The boy driving (= who was driving) the BMW was underage, unlicensed and over the limit.

y y y

Note that when we are talking about a single completed action in a defining relative clause, we cannot use an active participle: y The girl who fell down the cliff broke her leg. (NOT: The girl falling down cliff)

You might also like