Blast effect on structure
Blast effect on structure
Sulagno Banerjee
Research Scholar, Hindustan University
ABSTRACT
The objective of this paper is to review the works on effects of blast loading on
structures that as already been done till now. Due to the recent increase in various
terrorist activities all over the world, the safety of the structures should be designed to
resist bomb blasts. However, these designs could be and will be economically
inefficient, but they can be used for designing commercial office buildings, shopping
malls, government buildings and even 5-star hotels. Blast loads are basically dynamic
loads of a type that needs to be attentively calculated like wind and seismic loads and
the structures should be designed by considering them to make it blast resistant. But
this philosophy will cause the cost of construction to increase by a big amount. So,
special care must be taken if the structure is located in a sensitive place where
bombarding, explosions or war are the chiefs. Also, if it is located in the region of the
high-intensity earthquake. The objectives of this study are to elucidate on blast resistant
building design theories, the improvement of building security against the effects of
explosives in the process of structural design and the techniques in design that should
be carried out. The paper also includes information about explosives, blast loading
parameters and enhancements of blast resistant building design.
Key words: Blast Resistant Design, Blast Load, Explosion
Cite this Article: Sourish Mukherjee, Rittik Bhowmik, Aparna Das and Sulagno
Banerjee, Review Paper On Blast Loading And Blast Resistant Structures. International
Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(8), 2017, pp. 988–996.
http://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJCIET?Volume=8&Issue=8
1. INTRODUCTION
Blast loading or impulse loading is a type of load acting for a very short duration of time.
Graphically, blast loading is drawn as a triangle, referring as triangular loading. Damage to the
building causing loss of lives is a factor that has to be minimised if the threat of terrorist
activities cannot be stopped. This paper gives guideline measures for overcoming the effects of
explosions, hence providing protection to the structures and lives. Ductile elements like steel
and RCC can absorb a significant amount of strain energy, whereas brittle elements like PCC,
timber, brick masonry, glass, etc. fail abruptly. IS 4991-1968 has failed to deal with the different
kinds of loads developed in the dynamic response of a building to bomb blast. They need further
explanation as the engineers have no guidance on how to design or evaluate structures for the
blast anomaly for which an elaborated understanding is required. Though this topic is of prime
importance in the military circles and important data derived from tests and experiments have
been restricted to army use only. Yet a number of publications are available in the public domain
by the US agencies. In this paper, exploration of the literature on blast loading, explanation of
special conditions in defining these loads and also the exploration of the vulnerability
assessment and risk management of structures with standard structural analysis software having
nonlinear capabilities. In the past 2-3 decades, substantial importance has been given to
problems related to blasting and earthquake. Problems on Earthquake despite being very old,
most of the knowledge on this subject has been agglomerated during the past fifty years but in
the case of blast loading, this condition is different. Disasters such as Manchester Arena
bombing, UK, 22nd May 2017, at the Ariana Grande’s pop concert, Baghdad Bombing, Iraq, 3rd
July 2016, terrorist bombings of the 13th November 2015 Paris attacks were a series of
coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris and its northern Suburb, Mumbai 26/11 terrorist attack and
many more have demonstrated the need for a thorough examination of the structures subjected
to blast loads. With the present knowledge and software, it is possible to perform analysis of
structures exposed to blast loads and to evaluate their response.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
1. Design, materials and connections for blast-loaded structures prepared by ABS
Consulting Ltd for Health and Safety Executive, 2006
This project reviewed existing methodologies and a series of dynamic analysis of a series of
problems were undertaken. A simple tool for the analysis of blast response of a structure was
developed. This tool, named Blast STAR, was used to carry out multiple analysis of simple
structures which were loaded by blast type pulses geometries, duration and peak pressures. The
tool uses the results of a static Finite Element Analysis in order to find the force- displacement
and equivalent mass characteristics of an equivalent simplified system. The results of the
analysis are then compared against non-linear full model Finite Element Analysis. The results
explored the maximum displacements obtained for multiple loading scenarios for a range of
structures. The level of displacement is indicative of the level of damage arising from a
particular pulse load and can be used to predict levels of plastics strain in the structure.
Calculations of the reaction forces at the supports as well as forces in the connections are also
carried out and the results are compared.
10. Impacts and Analysis for Buildings under Terrorist Attacks by Edward
Eskew & Shinae Jang, 2012
This paper gives a systematic approach to assessing the causes and outcomes of terrorist attacks.
The literature also provides a systematic framework to investigate terrorist attacks and their
impacts on building structures. Common damage types from explosions to general civil
structures are provided including the World Trade Center attack on 9/11 and the Murrah
Building bombing. These examples provide perspectives on what can occur in a terrorist attack.
Then the basic principles of an explosion are explored, which is the foundation to design
analytical and experimental studies. After that, the impact of an explosion on a structure and
how that is determined is discussed. Analysis techniques for a damaged structure are also
explored in depth, as well as experimental methods used to validate and prove those techniques.
a. Overpressure
It is the pressure caused by a shock wave over and above normal atmospheric pressure. This
shock wave is a result of the explosion. The magnitude of overpressure blast wave is inversely
proportional to the distance of the receiving object from the centre of the explosion. Damage to
structures and other objects and injuries to people can be caused by both the positive and
negative overpressure of the blast. The damage from a blast wave is related to the magnitude
of the peak overpressure, rise time, duration, and impulse. Overpressure in an enclosed space
is determined by using “Weibull’s formula”
𝑚 0.72
∆𝑝 = 2410 ( )
𝑉
Where:
• 2410 is a constant based on 1 bar
• m = net explosive mass calculated using all explosive materials and their relative effectiveness
• V = volume of given area (primarily used to determine volume within an enclosed space)
b. Thermal Effects
Thermal impact is another major effect. It occurs when a fireball, or a volume of hot gases, is
generated. If the fireball impact and overpressure impact damage a structure’s fire-resisting
system by knocking off columns, fire coating, intense heat from the explosion can weaken
structural members, which can assist in the failure of those members, leading to potential
localised or progressive collapse. Thermal energy can also injure people, and ignite various
objects in a structure such as a furniture. The strength of the fireball is determined by the fuel
mass, fireball diameter, duration of the fireball, and the thermal emissive power.
c. Energized Projectiles
Energised projectiles consist of fragments, debris, and missiles, which can strike structures and
people, causing significant impact damage. These objects are thrown by the explosion with
varying levels of force depending on the object, the object’s proximity to the explosion, and the
explosion strength.
d. Debris Damage
When an explosion occurs, debris and fragments are thrown through the air which causes severe
damage to a structure. Fragments can be classified into two types: Primary or Secondary.
Primary fragments are actually parts of the explosion container having a mass of around 1 gram,
which is thrown at high speeds when the explosion occurs. Secondary objects are either
constrained or unconstrained objects (e.g. shards from windows) which are thrown by the
explosion. Their velocity and trajectory depend on their shape, size and the strength of the
constraint. The damage caused by these objects depend on their velocities, the distance between
their initial location and the target, angle of incidence and physical properties of the fragments
and the target.
5. PREVENTIVE PHILOSOPHY
It is not possible to design a building for an equivalent static load. During designing the
philosophy that could be followed is (considering that the blast occurs outside the building):
1. The exterior columns could be considered to be removed from the structural frame and
considering the interior most columns having less capacity,so that the section of the interior
columns are more than the usual. The load for the missing columns should be distributed by
using suitable techniques
2. After considering that the exterior columns are removed, the beams should be made stronger
than the usual, as after the blast, the beams are weak(due to the actual removal of the exterior
columns) and hence they distribute the load to the interior columns.
3. Provision of shear walls at suitable intervals.
4. Used hooked bars where continuous reinforcing is not possible (particularly at corners).
Some amount of inelastic response is generally anticipated when designing members for
blast response. The economy of design is achieved by selecting smaller members and allowing
greater inelasticity. Where greater protection is warranted, larger members are selected,
potentially even such that the response to the design blast threat remains elastic. While member
sizes can be scaled to match the desired level of protection, proper detailing of joints,
connections and reinforcing should always be provided so that the members can achieve large,
inelastic deformations even if the intent is for elastic response (thus providing greater margins
against an actual blast that is larger than the design blast). Without proper detailing, it is
uncertain whether a structure intended for blast resistance will achieve the design intent. The
January 2007 STRUCTURE® article Concrete Detailing for Blast provides effective
recommendations for concrete detailing.
REFERENCE
[1] Indian Standard IS 4991-1968 Criteria For Blast Resistant Design Of Structures For
Explosions Above Ground
[2] American Society of Civil Engineers (1997) Design of Blast Resistant Buildings in
Petrochemical Facilities, Reston, VA.
[3] T. Ngo, P. Mendis, A. Gupta & J. Ramsay, Blast Loading and Blast Effects on Structures
The University of Melbourne, Australia
[4] Zeynep Koccaz, Fatih Sutcu, Necdet Torunbalci, Architectural and Structural Design For
Blast Resistant Buildings
[5] Design, materials and connections for blast loaded structures Prepared by ABS Consulting
Ltd for the Health and Safety Executive 2006
[6] Effects of an External Explosion on a Concrete Structure PhD Thesis, UET Taxila, Pakistan,
March 2009
[7] Non-Linear Analysis of SDOF System under Blast Load, Assal T. Hussein
[8] Structural Design for External Terrorist Bomb Attacks by Jon A. Schmidt, P.E.
[9] Effects of Impulsive Loading on Reinforced Concrete Structures by Saeed Ahmad,
Mehwish Taseer, Huma Pervaiz, UET, Taxila, 2012
[10] Comparison of Maximum Stress distribution of Long & Short Side Column due to Blast
Loading by M. R.Wakchaure and Seema T. Borole, 2013
[11] Blast Loading Effects on Steel Columns by Ashish Kumar Tiwary, Aditya Kumar Tiwary,
Anil Kumar, Jaypee University, 2015
[12] Impacts and Analysis for Buildings under Terrorist Attacks by Edward Eskew & Shinae
Jang, 2012
[13] A. Khadid et al. (2007), Blast loaded stiffened plates, Journal of Engineering and Applied
Sciences, Vol. 2(2) pp. 456-461.
[14] Blast Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures by Dennis M. McCann, Ph.D.,
P.E. and Steven J. Smith, Ph.D., P.E.
[15] Hans R. W. Weibull (October 1968), Pressures recorded in partially closed chambers at
explosion of TNT charges, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 152 (1) : 357-361
[16] Blast-Resistant Design Considerations by Clay Naito, PhD, P.E., Lehigh University.
[17] D. Yogeswar, Dr. C. Sashidhar, A Study on the Impact of Blast Loading for Nuclear
Explosion on Structures. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(2),
2017, pp. 190–198.
[18] Eldo Simon and Dr. M. Sirajuddin, Parametric Study of Stand-Off Distance on a Bridge
under Blast Loading. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and
Technology, 8(2), 2017, pp 01–07
[19] Blast resistant design of structure to terrorist explosion by Makovička D, Makovička D, Jr.
[20] Blast Resistant Building Design: Building Behavior and Key Elements by Zac Liskay,
Shane Rugg, Conor Thompson
[21] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_burst