Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Criterion 1: Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives (50)

Sub Criteria Marks Evaluation Guidelines

1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the 05 A. Availability of the Vision & Mission statements of the Department (1)
Department and Institution B. Appropriateness/Relevance of the Statements (2)
C. Consistency of the Department statements with the Institute
statements (2)
(Here it has been asked to write Institute Vision and Mission statements
ensuring consistency with the department Vision and Mission statements;
the assessment of the Institute Vision and Mission will be done in Criterion 9)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Vision & Mission Statements B. Correctness from definition perspective C. Consistency between Institute and Department
statements

1.2.State the Program Educational 05 Listing of the Program Educational Objectives (3 to 5) of the program under
Objectives (PEOs) consideration (05)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Availability & appropriateness of the PEOs statements

1.3. Indicate where and how the 10 A. Adequacy in respect of publication & dissemination (02)
Vision, Mission and PEOs are B. Process of dissemination among stakeholders (02)
published and disseminated C. Extent of awareness of Vision, Mission & PEOs among the
among stakeholders stakeholders(06)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

1
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

A. Adequacy
Department Vision, Mission and PEOs: Availability on Institute website under relevant program link; Availability at department
notice boards, HoD Chamber, department website, if Available; Availability in
department level documents/course of study
B. Process of dissemination
Documentary evidence to indicate the process which ensures awareness among internal and external stakeholders with
effective process implementation

C. Extent of Awareness
Based on interaction with internal and external stakeholders

1.4. State the process for defining 15 A. Description of process of defining Vision & Mission of the Department
the Vision and Mission of the (07)
Department, and PEOs of the B. Description of process involved in defining the PEOs of the program
Program (08)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Documentary evidence to indicate the process for defining Vision, Mission & PEOS with effective process implementation

1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs 15 A. Preparation of a matrix of PEOs and elements of Mission statement
with Mission of the Department (5)
B. Consistency/justification of co-relation parameters of the above matrix
(10)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Availability of a matrix correlating PEOs and Mission elements B. Justification for each of the elements mapped in the matrix

Total: 50

2
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Criterion 2: Program Curriculum and Teaching–Learning Processes (200)

Sub Criteria Marks Evaluation Guidelines

2.1. Program Curriculum 50

2.1.1.State the process used to identify 30 A. Process used to identify extent of compliance of Board curriculum for
extent of compliance of the Board attaining POs &PSOs (15)
curriculum for attaining the B. List the curricular gaps for the attainment of POs & PSOs (15)
Program Outcomes(POs) &
Program Specific Note: In case all POs & PSOs are being demonstrably met through
Outcomes(PSOs), mention the Board Curriculum then2.1.2 will not be applicable and the
identified curricular gaps, if any weightage of 2.1.1 will be 50

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Documentary evidence to indicate the process which ensures mapping/compliance of Board Curriculum with the POs &
PSOs; Identification of gaps; if any. Effective participation of internal and external department stakeholders with effective
process implementation
B. Identified Curricular gaps and its Appropriateness

2.1.2. Content beyond the Syllabus 20 A. Steps taken to get identified gaps included in the curriculum (eg.
letter to Board) (2)
B. Delivery details of content beyond syllabus (12)
C. Mapping of content beyond syllabus with the POs & PSOs (6)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Documentary evidence of steps taken at regular interval

B. Delivered details – documentary evidence for at least one sample per assessment year to be verified

3
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

C. Availability and appropriateness of Mapping table between contents delivered and Program outcomes/Program specific
outcomes (Course outcomes)
2.2. Teaching-Learning Processes 150

2.2.1. Describe the Process followed to 25 A. Adherence to Academic Calendar (3)

ensure/improve quality of Teaching B. Use of various instructional planning and delivery methods (3)
Learning C. Methodologies to support weak students and encourage bright
students(4)
D. Quality of classroom teaching (Observation in a Class) (3)
E. Conduct of experiments (Observation in Lab) (3)
F. Continuous Assessment in the laboratory (3)
G. Student feedback of teaching learning process and action taken (6)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Availability of Academic Calendar based on Board academic calendar and its effective compliance
B. Documentary evidence to support implementation of pedagogical initiatives such as real life examples, collaborative
learning, ICT supported learning, interactive class rooms etc.
C. Guidelines to identify weak and bright students; post identification actions taken; impact observed
D. Class room ambience; efforts to keep students engaged (also to be verified during interaction with the students)
E. Quality of laboratory experience with respect to conducting, recording observations, analysis etc.(also to be verified during
interaction with the Students)
F. Lab Internal Semester examination and internal marks thereof, Practical record books, each experiment assessment, final
marks based on assessment of all the experiments, and other assessments, if any
G. Feedback format, frequency, analysis and actions taken (also to be verified during interaction with students)

2.2.2. Initiatives to improve the quality of 15 A. Process for internal semester question paper setting and evaluation
semester tests and assignments and effective process implementation (5)
B. Process to ensure questions from outcomes/learning levels
perspective (5)

4
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

C. Evidence of COs coverage in class test / mid-term tests and

assignments (5)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Process of internal semester question paper setting, model answers, evaluation and its compliance
B. Question paper validation to ensure desired standard from outcome attainment perspective as well as learning levels
perspective
C. Mapping of questions and assignments with the Course outcomes

2.2.3. Quality of experiments 15 A. Experimental methodologies (08)

B. Relevance to outcomes (07)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Batch size per experiment, quality of apparatus/instruments, instructional lab manuals, lab file/report
B. Mapping of the experiments with outcomes

2.2.4. Quality of Students Projects and 25 A. Identification of projects and allocation methodology (3)
Report Writing B. Types and relevance of the projects and their contribution towards
attainment of POs and PSOs(5)
C. Process for monitoring and evaluation (5)
D. Process to assess individual and team performance (5)
E. Quality of completed projects/working prototypes (5)
F. Papers published /Awards received by projects etc. (2)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Projects identification and guide allocation Process

B. Projects classification (application, product, research, review etc.) consideration to factors such as environment, safety,
ethics, cost, standards and mapping with program outcomes and program specific outcomes

5
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

C. Continuous monitoring mechanism and evaluation

D. Methodology(Appropriately documented) to assess individual contribution/understanding of the project as well as collective
contribution/understanding
E. Based on Projects demonstration
F. Quality of place (host) where the paper has been published /quality of competition in which award has been won

2.2.5. Industry interaction and Industry 30 A. Industry supported Labs (02)

Internship/Training B. Delivery of appropriate Course work by Industry experts (08)
C. Industrial visits/tours for students (05)
D. Industrial training (10)
E. Post training Assessment (05)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed: (Documentary evidence from A to E)

A. Involvement of industry in setting/running the labs.

B. Periodic engagement with industry experts in delivery of courses
C. Industry tours mandated into the student preparation
D. Industrial training for minimum two weeks for all students
E. Assessing the impact of training on students’ learning

2.2.6. Information Access Facilities and 15 A. Availability of facilities & Effective Utilization (10)
Student Centric Learning Initiatives B. Student Centric Learning Initiatives & Effective Implementation (05)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed: (Documentary evidence from A to B)

A. ICT enabled delivery methods, smart classrooms

B. E – resources, digital library

2.2.7. New Initiatives for embedding 15 A. Core employability skill enhancement Initiatives and effective

6
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Professional Skills implementation (08)

B. Personality development related Initiatives & effective
implementation (07)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed: (Documentary evidence from A to B)

Self Explanatory

2.2.8. Co-curricular & Extra Curricular 10 Type of activities and relevance

Activities

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed: (Documentary evidence)

Self Explanatory

Total: 200

7
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Criterion 3: Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes (100)

Sub Criteria Marks Evaluation Guidelines

3.1. Establish the correlation between 20
the courses and the POs &PSOs

3.1.1. Course Outcomes 05 A. Evidence of COs being defined for every course (5)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Appropriateness of the statements shall be seen for atleast two courses each from 1st, 2nd, 3rd year of study

3.1.2. CO-PO & CO-PSOs matrices of 05 A. Explanation of table to be ascertained (5)

courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Mapping to be verified

3.1.3. Program level Course-PO/PSOs 10 A. Explanation of tables to be ascertained (10)

matrix of ALL courses including first year
courses

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes getting mapped with the majority of the courses to be verified

3.2. Attainment of Course Outcomes 40

8
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

3.2.1.Describe the assessment processes 10 A. List of assessment processes (05)

used to gather the data upon which B. The quality /relevance of assessment processes & tools used (05)
the evaluation of course Outcome is
based

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. & B. Evidence for appropriate assessment processes including data collection, verification, analysis, decision making

3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course 30 A. Verify the attainment levels as per the benchmark set for all courses
Outcomes of all courses with (30)
respect to set attainment levels

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Methodology to define set levels and its compliance; data collection, verification, analysis and decision making; details for
two courses per year of studies are to be verified randomly

3.3. Attainment of Program Outcomes 40

and Program Specific Outcomes

3.3.1.Describe assessment tools and 10 A. List of assessment tools & processes (02)
processes used for assessing the B. The quality/relevance of assessment tools/processes used (08)
attainment of each of the POs
&PSOs
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. &B. Direct and indirect assessment tools & processes ; effective compliance; direct assessment methodology, indirect
assessment formats-collection analysis; decision making based on direct and indirect assessment

9
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

3.3.2. Provide results of evaluation of 30 A. Verification of documents, results and level of attainment of each
each PO & PSO PO/PSO (20)
B. Overall levels of attainment (10 )

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. & B. Appropriate attainment level and documentary evidences; details for POs & PSOs attainment from core courses to be
verified. Also atleast four POs & two PSOs attainment levels shall be verified

Total: 100

10
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Criterion 4: Students’ Performance (200)

Sub Criteria Marks Evaluation Guidelines

4.1. Enrolment Ratio 20 Students enrolled at the First Year Level on average basis
during the period of assessment

A. >= 90% (20)

B. >= 80% (18)
C. >= 70% (16)
D. >= 60% (12)
E. >= 50% (08)
F. Otherwise ‘0’.
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. B. & C. Data to be verified for each of the assessment years

4.2. Success Rate in the stipulated period 60

of the program

4.2.1. Success rate without backlogs in any 40 SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program without
Semester/year of study backlog)/(Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and
admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry)
Without Backlog means no compartment or Average SI = Mean of success index (SI) for past three batches
failure in any semester/year of study Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 40 × Average SI

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Data to be verified for each of the assessment years

11
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

4.2.2. Success rate in stipulated period 20 SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program in the stipulated
(actual duration of the program) period of course duration)/(Number of students admitted in the first year of
that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry)
Average SI = mean of success index (SI) for past three batches
Success rate = 20 × Average SI
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Data to be verified for each of the assessment years

Note: if 100% students clear without any backlog then also total marks scored will be 60 as both 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 will be applicable
simultaneously.

4.3. Academic Performance in Final 15 Academic Performance Level = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance
Year (3rd Year) Index)
API = ((Mean of 3rdYear Grade Point Average of all successful Students on
a 10 point scale) or(Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful
students in Third Year/10)) x (successful students/number of students
appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those passed in all the final year courses

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Data to be verified for atleast one of the assessment years

4.4. Academic Performance in Second 20 Academic Performance Level = 2.0 * Average API (Academic Performance
Year Index)
API = ((Mean of 2ndYear Grade Point Average of all successful Students
on a 10 point scale) or
(Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in Second

12
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Year/10)) x (successful
students/number of students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Third
year
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Data to be verified for atleast one of the assessment years

4.5. Academic performance in First 25 Academic Performance Level = 2.5 * Average API (Academic Performance
year Index)
API = ((Mean of 1st Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students
on a 10 point scale) or
(Mean of the percentage of marks of all successful students in First
Year/10)) x (successful
students/number of students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Second
year
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Data to be verified for atleast one of the assessment years

4.6. Placement and higher studies 40 Assessment Point = 40 × (1.25X + Y)/N

where, X= Number of students placed in companies or Government sector
through on/off campus recruitment
Y = Number of students admitted to higher studies
N =Total number of final year students
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Documentary evidence for atleast for one year to be verified

13
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

4.7. Professional Activities 20

4.7.1.Professional Societies/Student 15 A. Availability of Professional Societies/Chapters & Relevant activities

Chapters and organizing Technical (10)
Events B. Number, quality of engineering events (05)

(Level – Dept./Institute/State/National/International)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Self Explanatory

4.7.2. Publication of technical magazines, 05 A. Quality & Relevance of the contents and Print Material (3)
newsletters, etc. B. Participation of Students from the program (2)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Documentary evidence
B. Documentary evidence - Students participation (also to be confirmed during interaction with the students)

Total: 200

14
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Criterion 5: Faculty Information and Contributions (150)

Sub Criteria Marks Evaluation Guidelines

5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) 20 A. Availability of eligible HoD for all the Assessment years (05),
Otherwise ‘0’ marks
B. Marks to be give proportionally from a max. of 15 to minimum of 10 for
average of 20:1 to 25:1, ‘0’ for average SFR higher than 25:1
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Faculty & Students number calculations as per SAR

5.2. Faculty Qualification 20 FQ = 2.0 x [{10X +7Y}/F] where

X is no. of faculty with M.Tech, Y is no. of faculty with B.Tech, F is no. of

faculty required to comply 1:20 Faculty Student ratio
(Calculations as per 5.1)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Documentary evidence – Faculty Qualification

5.3. Faculty Retention 20 % required Faculties retained during the period of assessment
Keeping CAYm2 as base year

A. >= 90% (20)

B. >= 75% (15)
C. >= 60% (10)
D. >= 50% (05)
E. < 50% (0)

15
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Faculty date of joining; atleast three month (July-April-May) salary statement for each of the assessment years

5.4. Faculty as participant in Faculty 30 A. Faculty scores maximum five points for participation
Development/Training activities B. Three points - Participant in 2 to 5 days Faculty development program
(05)
C. Five points - Participant >5 days Faculty development program (05)
Assessment = 6 × Sum/0.5 Required Faculty (Marks limited to 30)

5.5. Product development, 20 5 marks in each based on documentary evidence

Consultancy, Manufacturing
Contracts, Testing Contracts

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Consultancy, Manufacturing contracts, Testing Contracts resulting into revenue generation.

5.6. Faculty Performance Appraisal 30 The assessment is based on -

and Development System A. A well-defined system instituted for all the assessment years (05)
(FPADS) B. Its implementation and effectiveness (15)
C. Qualification up-gradation of faculty (10)
5.7. Implementation of Career 10 Documented evidence of implementation
Advancement Scheme

Total: 150

16
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Criterion 6: Facilities and Technical Support (100)

Sub Criteria Marks Evaluation Guidelines

6.1. Availability of adequate, well- 10
equipped classrooms to meet the
curriculum requirements

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Self explanatory

6.2. Availability of adequate, well- 10

equipped workshops to meet the
curriculum requirements

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Self-explanatory

6.3. Adequate and well equipped 30 A. Adequacy (05)

laboratories, and technical B. Well equipped Labs (15)
manpower C. Technical Manpower support –Eligible and Adequate (10)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Self-explanatory

6.4. Additional facilities created for 20 A. Facilities (05)

improving the quality of learning B. Effective Utilization (05)

17
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

experience in laboratories C. Relevance to POs/PSOs (10)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Self explanatory

6.5. Laboratories: Maintenance and 10 Self Explanatory

overall ambiance

6.6. Availability of computing facility 10 Availability and Adequacy

in the department

6.7. Language lab 10 Availability and Effective Utilization (no. of students enrolled for language
classes)

Total: 100

18
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Criterion 7: Continuous Improvement (75)

Sub Criteria Marks Evaluation Guidelines

7.1. Actions taken based on the 25 A. Documentary evidence of POs and PSOs attainment levels (10)
results of evaluation of each B. Identification of gaps/shortfalls/improvement from continuous
of the POs and PSOs improvement perspective (5)
C. Plan of action to bridge the gap and its Implementation (10)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Documentary evidence in respect of attainment of each of the POs and PSOs

7.2. Improvement in Success Index of 10 A. Assessment proportional to the improvement

Students without the backlog

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Self Explanatory

7.3. Improvement in Placement and 10 Assessment is based on Nos., Quality placements, Core Companies, Pay
Higher Studies package

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Self Explanatory

7.4 Improvement in Academic 10 Assessment proportional to the improvement

Performance in Final Year

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

19
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Documentary evidence – list of students admitted; admission authority guidelines; ranks/scores; comparative status considering
CAYm2 as a base year

7.5 Internal Academic Audits to 10 A. Audit Criteria

Review Complete Academics & to B. Frequency
Implement Corrective Actions on C. Methodology
Continuous Basis D. Effectiveness
E. Action Plan
7.6. New Facility created in the 10 Relevance
program

Total: 75

20
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Criterion 8: Student Support Systems (50)

Sub Criteria Marks Evaluation Guidelines

8.1. Mentoring system to help at individual 10 A. Details of the mentoring system that has been developed for the
level students for various purposes and also state the efficacy of such
system (10)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Mentoring system terms of reference; implementation; effectiveness (also to be verified during interaction with the students),
no. of faculties involved

8.2. Feedback analysis and 10 A. Methodology being followed for feedback collection, analysis and
reward/corrective measures taken, if its effectiveness (05)
any B. Record of corrective measures taken (05)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Feedback questions, collection process, analysis, actions taken, effectiveness

8.3. Feedback on facilities 05 A. Student feedback on facilities, analysis and corrective action taken
(05)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Self Explanatory

21
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

8.4. Carrier Guidance, Training, Placement 20 A. Availability (05)

B. Management (10)
C. Effectiveness (05)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Self Explanatory

8.5. Entrepreneurship Cell/Technology 05 A. Availability (01)

Business Incubator B. Management (02)
C. Effectiveness (02)

Total: 50

22
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

Criterion 9: Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources (75)

Sub Criteria Marks Evaluation Guidelines

9.1. Organization, Governance and 25
Transparency
9.1.1.State the Vision and Mission of the 05 A. Availability of the Vision & Mission statements of the Institute (02)
Institute B. Appropriateness/Relevance of the Statements (03)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Institute Vision and Mission statements: Availability of statements on Institute website; Availability at Central facilities
such as Library, Computer Center, Principal Chamber etc. Availability of one set of statements in Documents
B. Correctness from definition perspective

9.1.2. Governing body, administrative setup, 05 A. List the Governing Body Composition; their memberships,
functions of various bodies, service functions, and responsibilities (02)
rules procedures, recruitment and B. Minutes of the meetings and action-taken reports (01)
promotional policies. C. The published service rules, policies and procedures with year of
publication (01)
D. Extent of awareness among the employees/students (01)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Self explanatory

9.1.3. Decentralization in working and 05 A. List the names of the faculty members who have been delegated
grievance re.dressal mechanism powers for taking administrative decisions (02)
B. Specify the mechanism and composition of grievance redressal

23
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

cell including Anti Ragging Committee & Sexual Harassment

Committee (03)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. & B. Documentary evidence

9.1.4. Delegation of financial powers 05 A. Demonstrate the utilization of financial powers for each of the
assessment years (05)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Circulars notifying financial powers and Documentary evidence to exhibit utilization at each levels during assessment years

9.1.5. Transparency and availability of 05 A. Information on the policies, rules, processes is to be made
correct/unambiguous information in available on web site (2)
public domain B. Dissemination of the information about student, faculty and staff
(3)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. & B. Website and Documentary evidence

9.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and 10

Public Accounting at Institute level

9.2.1. Adequacy of Budget allocation 04 Process and Adequacy (04)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

24
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

A. Budget formulation, finalization and approval process

B. Requirement – allocation –adequacy – justification thereof

9.2.2. Utilization of allocated funds 04 A. Budget utilization for three years (04)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Balance sheet; effective utilization; random verification for atleast two of the three assessment years

9.2.3. Availability of the audited 02 A. Availability of Audited statements on website (02)

statements on the institute’s
website
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Website

9.3. Program Specific Budget 15 To be evaluated in consultation with the Program Experts
Allocation, Utilization

9.3.1. Adequacy of budget allocation 07 A. Adequacy (07)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

A. Budget formulation, finalization, approval process and Requirement – allocation –adequacy – justification thereof

9.3.2. Utilization of allocated funds 08 A. Budget utilization for three years (08)

Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

25
 Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed - SAR (Diploma)

First Time Accreditation

A. Balance sheet; effective utilization; random verification for atleast two of the three assessment years

9.4. Library and Internet 25

9.4.1.Quality of learning 10 A. Availability of relevant learning resources including e-resources

resources(hard/soft) and Digital Library (7)
B. Accessibility to students (3)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Availability; Adequacy; Effectiveness

(Also to be verified during interactions with the faculty and students)

9.4.2. Internet 10 A. Available bandwidth (4)

B. Wi Fi availability (2)
C. Internet access in labs, classrooms, library and offices of all
Departments (2)
D. Security Arrangements (2)
Exhibits/Context to be Observed/Assessed:

Availability as per AICTE norms; Adequacy; Effectiveness

(Also to be verified during interactions with the faculty and students)

9.5. Institutional Contribution to the 05

Community Development

Total: 75

26