BudgetingStrategiesofFinancialManagementStudentsABasisforInvestmentDecision (1)
BudgetingStrategiesofFinancialManagementStudentsABasisforInvestmentDecision (1)
11384501
Abstract
Students' investing choices and budgeting techniques need to be taken into consideration. This is crucial because,
in order to make wise financial decisions and understand the potential effects these decisions may have on their
life, students need to understand the principles of decision-making. Students should think about various elements
that could affect their decision-making since they might not always make logical decisions. This study aimed to
assess the budgeting strategies of the financial management students of School of Business Administration and
Governance for the Academic Year 2022-2023, as a basis for investment decision. This study employed a Mixed
Method research design for better analysis of the study. The participants of the study were the Financial
Management Students at the University of Cagayan Valley. Frequency and percentage counts and T-Test were
used to treat the data. Based on the findings of the study, it can be concluded that the 50/30/20 budget and envelope
budgeting methods emerge as effective tools for fostering disciplined spending habits among participants, and by
combining these approaches, individuals can manage their money strategically and practically. The researcher
suggests that future researchers address alternative demographic characteristics that may influence budgeting
techniques among financial management students, as current findings imply that gender and year level may not
be major contributors.
Keywords: Budgeting, Budgeting Strategies, Envelope Strategies, Investment, 50/30/20 Budget.
INTRODUCTION
Budgeting is a good way to monitor spending and determine whether you are using too much
money. It is also important to be aware of personal finance. Establishing a budget while in
college can help students understand where the money goes each month. Nowadays, students
are often faced with a difficult choice when it comes to budgeting. Nonetheless, students need
to understand that these decisions can have serious consequences, so it is important for them
to take each decision-making process seriously.
There are many budgeting strategies that students could choose on the internet, which could fit
their financial capability, such as Zero-based budget and Incremental budget. However, after
studying these two strategies thoroughly, it turns out that they are not applicable for students
who do not have a source of income; they are more suitable to use for those who receive income
regularly. The 50/30/20 rule and envelope budgeting are chosen for their simplicity in
managing money. These budget methods are more likely compatible to use by the students
unlike the Zero-based budget and Incremental budget, where there are lots of things that need
to be considered. In a world that contains complex financial concepts, these solutions provide
506 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
students with an easy way to manage their funds. Students with proper budgeting help them to
spend less and start considering their financial goals. Being a college student with lots of
priorities should follow a budgeting plan because aside from it keeps them out of debt, it was
also a strategy to improve the spending and saving habits of a student. Students practicing the
50-30-20 rule helped them to handle their allowance properly. It helps to dodge the shortage of
allowance, save the excess money, and enhance the knowledge in budgeting. The 50% of their
allowance was for needs such as bills, necessities, payment of tuition, food, and etc., while the
30% goes to their wants, and lastly, the 20% was for the savings. (Castaritas et al., 2020)
According to the makers of the 50-30-20 rule from the book "All Your Worth: The Ultimate
Lifetime Money Plan" written by US Senator Elizabeth Warren and Amelia Warren Tyagi,
budgeting the allowance does not need to be complex; thus, it is efficient to align financial
goals. They mentioned that in budgeting, divide it into three spending classifications: needs,
wants, and savings. Fifty percent of the allowance is for needs or expenses such as monthly
rent, transportation, electricity bills, and groceries. Thirty percent of the allowance could go to
wants or non-essential desires such as eating out, online shopping, and so forth. While the last
20% of the allowance goes to savings, if a person regularly saves for the future, it could help
reach financial goals and achieve a better investment plan. This strategy's capacity to help you
carefully assess your necessities versus your wants and then set proper boundaries for each is
one of its key focuses.
Moreover, according to Meena Palani and her team, as reported in their article "Household
Debt and Saving Behavior," persons who used the 50/30/20 budgeting technique displayed a
significant improvement in their financial well-being. It was effective in motivating people to
save and invest a significant amount of their income. As a result, young adults' financial
discipline and security improved.
Furthermore, Dr. Silverman and Palani's team stressed that the 50/30/20 budgeting technique
is an effective tool for teaching young people financial management. By combining play with
financial education, the strategy improved knowledge and recall of financial concepts, resulting
in more effective financial management.
The budgeting strategies and investment decisions made by students require attention. This is
essential because students must grasp the fundamentals of decision-making to ensure prudent
investment decisions and comprehend the consequences these decisions may have on their
lives. Students should consider what other factors may influence their decision-making
process, as their choices may not always be rational.
Moreover, managing expenses is essential for students, demanding precision in determining
where money will be spent and how it will be earned and saved. Hence, budgeting involves
making a plan for their money. They determine how much money they have to allocate to
various expenses, such as rent, food, and savings. It serves as a practical way to monitor
spending, promoting financial mindfulness. This practice is not just about where money is
allocated but also encourages wiser decisions, ultimately impacting everyday lifestyle choices.
Establishing a budget in college aids students in understanding their monthly financial flow
507 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
508 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
to explore the numerous budgeting tactics and tools available to discover the best solution for
everyone’s financial needs.
According to Simone Galperti (2019), a simple consumption-savings model is explained with
a present-biased agent to provide a theoretical analysis of the relationship between self-control
problems and personal budgeting. Unlike minimum-savings rules, good-specific spending caps
help to reduce overspending by causing inefficiencies in consumption that reduce the return
from under saving, thus counteracting present bias. As a result, good-specific budgets are not
free, and they are only used by agents who are weakly biased and uncertain about their
infratemporal trade-offs between goods. Those who are not subject to such uncertainty prefer
to rely solely on a minimum-savings rule. The theory matches existing empirical findings, such
as the fact that people frequently set budgets for goods that are not normally regarded as
tempting, and that only those with a weak present bias appear to use budgets.
Budgeting money and adequately managing it have become essential in developing our
financial stability. It is now vital that an individual is well-educated financially because it is
considered a life skill. The new generation of students is presumed to be the most susceptible
individuals due to their impulsiveness in purchasing both needs and wants. Significantly, with
new technology, online shopping applications are everywhere. With proper knowledge of
handling money, it will lessen their financial problems during their college years. It was
highlighted that students' behavior in spending and limited knowledge of budgeting might
result in money management errors today and in the future according to Bona (2017).
According to Hamilton (2020) of The Importance of Budgeting in College, studying in college
can be a financial nightmare due to the high tuition prices and a lack of reliable income. It
enables an individual to determine which costs, such as tuition, housing, and food, are
unavoidable and warrant taking out a student loan. The capacity to manage a budget will ensure
that the expenses are adequately covered after college, to start a career, buy a house, have a
family, and so forth. A college budget enables to manage the expenditures and establish the
best financial situation for when they begin their job, rather than accruing debt and wasting
money that will need to be paid back with interest. Budgeting is a crucial task to complete as a
college student, as it helps them develop life skills and secure their financial future. It makes
sense if a person wants to give up on the entire budgeting effort right away due to the lack of
income and high debt levels. However, the truth is that tracking of spending, reducing the debts,
and putting the person in the best possible financial position are all crucial during the time in
college.
According to Bebasari & Istikomah (2020) in their study titled, “The Effect of Investment
Motivation, Financial Literation, and Financial Behavior on Investment Decisions” the three
dependent variables which are the investment motivation, financial literacy and financial
behavior have effects on the investment decision. The recommendation of the researchers is to
invest in capital market, increase self-motivation and deepen the understanding and knowledge
in terms of investment using the learning items of the schools.
509 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
Moreover, Hani et al., 2020 mentioned in their study, “The Effect of Investment Education and
Investment Experience on Investment Decision with Financial Knowledge as Intervening
Variable”, that investment education has a positive effect on investment decisions. This means
that the investment learning process that has been passed will increase the ability of student
investors in making investment decisions. The researchers recommended having more
financial knowledge by investment knowledge and having more experience in investment that
can make them wise in investment decision.
Further, a study conducted by Contante et al. (2019) titled, “Budgeting Strategies and Its Impact
to the Financial Decision-Making of 12 ABM Students in Bestlink College of the Philippines,
found out that teachers, the administration of school, and as well as the parents needs to be
aware of the expenses of the students and should have a program that will teach them the
importance of Budgeting Strategies in their financial decisions. Parents should assist their
children in budgeting their allowances. They recommended four strategies that students can
use in their budget: Do it yourself, Weekly meals planning, Piggy Bank/Saving Tools, setting
aside the wants, and prioritizing only the needs. Parents are the ones who give prior knowledge
to their children about managing their children's money.
Thus, this research may help the researcher’s spread information that guides the financial
management students in budgeting their allowances and what investments are applicable when
they save money using the two budgeting strategies. The researchers have included
recommendations for those students who have struggled in budgeting their allowance.
Statement of the Problem
This study aimed to assess the budgeting strategies of the financial management students of
School of Business Administration and Governance for the Academic Year 2022-2023, as a
basis for investment decision. Specifically, it sought to answer the following questions:
1. What is the demographic profile of the participants in terms of:
1.1. Age
1.2. Gender
1.3. Parents Monthly Income
1.4. Weekly Allowance
1.5. Year Level
2. What are the budgeting strategies of the participants in terms of:
2.1. 50/30/20 Budget
2.2. Envelope Budget
3. Is there a significant difference on the budgeting strategies of the participants when grouped
according to Gender and Year Level?
4. What are the problems/challenges encountered by the participants in budgeting?
510 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
Hypothesis
This study was guided by a lone hypothesis that:
There is no significant difference on budgeting strategies of the participants when grouped
according to gender and year level.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study employed a Mixed Method research design for better analysis of the study. The
descriptive quantitative analysis served as the research design of the study, requiring gathering
information to test hypotheses or find answers about the subject of the study, resulting in
reliance on information about the participants' budgeting strategies. Meanwhile, Narrative-
Qualitative analysis is a method used to discuss the problems/challenges encountered by the
financial management students through open-ended questions. The participants of the study
were the Financial Management Students at the University of Cagayan Valley. The total
population of the students was 313, calculated using Slovin’s formula with a margin of error
of 0.05, resulting in 176 participants. A survey questionnaire was utilized as a research tool,
and some variables were adopted from the series of related literature and studies. Some of the
questions that were adopted were revised. The series of questions had to be answered by the
participants. The survey questionnaire was divided into 4 parts, which included the profile of
the participants, the budgeting strategies in terms of 50/30/20 budget and envelope budget, and
the problems encountered by the participants. Frequency and percentage counts were used to
analyze the profile variables of the participants. Moreover, weighted mean was employed to
assess the different domains using the Likert Scale on the next page.
Numerical Value Descriptive Value Descriptive Scale
4 3.26-4.00 Strongly Agree
3 2.51-3.25 Agree
2 1.76-2.50 Disagree
1 1.00-1.75 Strongly Disagree
Furthermore, T-Test was used to test the difference on the budgeting strategies of financial
management students when grouped according to gender and year level. Lastly, frequency
counts were used for the qualitative data that was answered by the participants regarding the
problems/challenges encountered in budgeting, and the data gathered was treated by narrating
it.
511 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
The table above shows that there are 84 or 47.7 percent of the total number of participants
whose ages are in the range of 21–22 years old, while the ages below 21 years old and above
22 years old are 74 or 42.0 percent and 18 or 10.3 percent respectively. This implies that almost
all the participants are in the early adulthood stage.
Table 1b: Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Participants’ Relative to
Gender
Gender Frequency Percentage
Male 41 23.3
Female 135 76.6
Total 176 100.0
The table above reveals that there are more female participants than the male participants with
135 or 76.6 percent and 41 or 23.3 percent respectively. This implies that majority of the
participants are female.
Table 1c: Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Participants’ Relative to
Parents’ Monthly Income
Parent’s Monthly Income Frequency Percentage
Php 1,000 – Php 5,000 57 32.4
Php 6,000 – Php 11,000 47 26.7
Php 12,000 – Php 19,000 22 12.5
Php 20,000 – Php 26,000 33 18.8
Php 27,000 – Php 35,000 7 4.0
Php 36,000 – Php 49,000 5 2.8
Php 50,000 – Php 100,000 4 2.3
Above Php 100,000 1 0.5
Total 176 100.0
Mean = Php 13,897.73
As reflected above, 57 or 32.4 percent of the total number of the participants have their family
monthly income below Php5,000, while 1 or 0.5 percent is above Php 100,000. The mean
parents’ monthly income is Php 13,897.73, which implies that the participants’ family monthly
income was above the minimum monthly wage in the province.
Table 1d: Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Participants’ Relative to
Weekly Allowance
Weekly Allowance Frequency Percentage
Php 200 – Php 600 27 15.3
Php 700 – Php 1,000 63 35.8
Php 1,100 – Php 1,400 11 6.3
Php 1,500 – Php 2,900 73 41.5
Php 3,000 – Php 8,000 2 1.1
Total 176 100.0
Mean = Php 931.82
512 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
The table reveals that 73 or 41.5 percent of the total number of the participants have a weekly
allowance of Php 1,500 – Php 2,900, while there are 11 or 6.3 percent of the participants with
a weekly allowance of Php 1,100-Php1,400. The mean weekly allowance is Php931.82, which
implies that the participants are able to provide for their daily living needs with their weekly
allowance.
Table 1e: Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Participants Relative to Year
Level
Year Level Frequency Percentage
1st year 44 25.0
2nd Year 44 25.0
3rd Year 44 25.0
4th Year 44 25.0
Total 176 100.0
The table above shows that 44 or 25.0 percent of the total number of the participants in each
year level. This implies that there is an equal number of participants and it is well distributed
in each year level.
Table 2a: Item Mean and Descriptive Interpretation on the Budgeting Strategies of the
Participants in terms of 50/30/20 Budget
Item Descriptive
Items
Mean interpretation
I know how to estimate my expenses monthly. 3.20 Agree
I know how to distinguish my needs and wants. 3.30 Agree
I know when it is time to stop spending money on something that I've decided I Strongly
3.26
need or want. Agree
I feel capable of putting 50% for my necessities, 30% for other things and 20%
3.03 Agree
for savings.
I know how much money is needed for emergencies and unexpected expenses;
3.20 Agree
this would include things like school fees, medical bills, fare, groceries, and rent.
I could calculate the total amount of money I need to spend on my project. 3.11 Agree
I know how much money to spend on non-essential items. 3.16 Agree
I know how much money I have to spend for a month. 3.10 Agree
I feel control in my financial situation by 50-30-20 budgeting. 3.01 Agree
I spend less than my allowance. 2.82 Agree
Categorical Mean 3.121 Agree
As gleaned from the table above, the highest-rated item is statement 3, “I know when it is time
to stop spending money on something that I’ve decided I need or want,” with an item mean of
3.26, indicating "strongly agree." On the other hand, the lowest-rated item is statement 10, “I
spend less than my allowance,” with an item mean of 2.82, indicating "agree." This implies
that the participants were responsible in spending their money and did not get tempted by their
wants.
Furthermore, the categorical mean is 3.121, described as "agree." This suggests that the
participants have a decent knowledge of the 50/30/20 budget and apply this strategy in their
513 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
daily living. One idea that supports this study in using the 50/30/20 budgeting strategy is the
research conducted by Meena Palani and her team, as reported in their article "Household Debt
and Saving Behaviour." The study found that the 50/30/20 budgeting strategy helps individuals
manage their finances more effectively, as it encourages them to allocate a significant portion
of their income to savings and investments. This supports the idea that the 50/30/20 budgeting
strategy can be a useful tool for promoting financial discipline and security among young
adults.
In conclusion, the 50/30/20 budgeting strategy is a useful tool for teaching financial
management to young individuals, as it combines play with financial education. Research
conducted by Dr. Brian Silverman and Meena Palani and her team shows that this approach
leads to better understanding and retention of financial concepts, as well as more effective
financial management. According to Smith (2020), the study participants exhibited a strong
comprehension of the 50/30/20 budget strategy. The mean score of responses related to the
strategy’s definition and implementation was significantly above average, leading to its
categorization as "agree." This indicates that most people are not only aware of the strategy but
also understand how to apply it (Smith, 2020). This is a good indication that at a young age,
they can handle the money given by their parents. This study can be a way to teach the students
how important it is to manage their finances so that as they grow up, they will achieve financial
stability.
Table 2b: Item Mean and Descriptive Interpretation on the Budgeting Strategies of the
Participants in terms of Envelope Budget
Item Descriptive
Items
Mean Scale
I know how much I fixed cost (food, allowance, transportation) total each month. 3.15 Agree
I set aside money each month for savings or investments because it is important. 2.97 Agree
I am more comfortable putting my money in an envelope for easy identification. 2.67 Agree
I understand the purpose of using envelope strategy 2.77 Agree
I know how much money I set aside or out into the envelope. 2.76 Agree
I track easily my expenses through envelope budget. 2.64 Agree
I am more comfortable to set aside my budget by cash stuffing. 3.01 Agree
I can make more savings by setting aside my expenses. 2.98 Agree
I am able to avoid overspending my money for wants through envelope budgeting. 2.81 Agree
I am able to prioritize my needs by dividing the monthly expenses through
2.77 Agree
envelope budgeting.
Categorical Mean 2.852 Agree
The table above shows that the highest-rated item is statement 1, “I know how much my fixed
costs (food, allowance, transportation) total each month,” with the highest mean of 3.15, while
item 3, “I am more comfortable putting my money in an envelope for easy identification,” is
the lowest-rated item with an item mean of 2.67. This implies that the participants can use a
fixed amount of money for their needs and have savings for other expenses.
It is also important to know what to prioritize, as it lessens the trouble in spending money on
what is not necessary. According to the "Envelope Saving Method: Budgeting Guide" by
514 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
SmartAsset, by dividing cash into envelopes for different spending categories, individuals can
gain better control over their money and track their expenses more effectively. The method can
also be adapted for saving, providing a tangible and structured approach to budgeting and
managing finances. In the article “3 go-to strategies to make
budgeting less complicated, less stressful, and easier to stick with” by Business Insider,
emphasizes the effectiveness of the envelope budgeting method in making budgeting less
complicated, less stressful, and easier to stick with. By using this method, individuals can stop
wasting money on frivolous purchases, focus their spending, and limit their expenses to the
available cash in each envelope.
This approach forces individuals to live within their budget and can be a powerful tool for
improving savings and paying off debt. The expenses in college life may be more stressful
because of the left and right requirements, projects, bills, and necessities, but if the students are
aware of how to handle their expenses carefully, it can be less difficult.
Generally, the categorical mean is 2.852 with a descriptive value of “agree,” which means that
the participants were knowledgeable enough in terms of envelope strategies that they apply in
saving up money.
Table 3a: Test of Difference between the Budgeting Strategies of the Participants when
grouped According to Gender and Year Level
50/30/20 Budget Envelope Budget
Profile Categories Critical Sig. Critical Sig.
Mean Decision Mean Decision
Value (2-tailed) Value (2-tailed)
Male 3.125 2.847 Accept
Gender 0.557 0.578 Accept Ho -0.622 0.534
Female 3.105 2.868 Ho
1st Year 3.114 2.859
Year 2nd Year 3.150 2.863 Accept
0.443 0.722 Accept Ho 0.108 0.955
Level 3rd Year 3.102 2.838 Ho
4th Year 3.116 2.850
As shown in the table above, there is no significant difference between the two budgeting
strategies when grouped according to gender and year level. The p-value for gender and year
level in the 50/30/20 budget strategy are 0.578 and 0.722, respectively, which are above the
significance level of 0.050. While, the p-value for gender and year level in envelope budget
strategies were 0.534 and 0.955, respectively, also exceeding the significance level of 0.050.
Hence, the null hypothesis is accepted. This aligns with research from Al Shorafa et al. (2016),
examining demographic factors influencing investment decisions using a sample size of 140
from Saudi Arabia. Research findings show that except for education, other variables such as
gender, age, income, and experience have no impact on investment decisions. This implies that
regardless of their gender and year level, students can make wise budgeting strategies and select
the best investment option. It still depends on the individual on how they will handle their
allowances/money.
515 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
516 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
of funds for necessities and unexpected bills, highlighting the need for better budget
management. Unexpected School Expenses: The statement, with a frequency of 14 and a
percentage of 7.95%, reveals that students encountered unexpected school expenses, which
were not included in their weekly budgets. These unexpected fees posed challenges in
budgeting and managing their allowances effectively.
Sudden Increase of Commodity Prices: The statement, with a frequency of 11 and a percentage
of 6.25%, indicates that students struggled with sudden increases in commodity prices, leading
to a shortfall in their allowances. This unexpected expense affected their budgeting plans and
financial management.
No Budget Method: The statement, with a frequency of 8 and a percentage of 4.55%,
demonstrates that some students lacked a budgeting technique or method, making it difficult
for them to allocate their money properly. This lack of budgeting method hindered their ability
to manage their allowances effectively.
Food Expenses and High Fare Expenses: These statements, with a frequency of 7 and a
percentage of 3.98%, show that students encountered challenges with food expenses and high
fare expenses, particularly with the rising cost of transportation and food. These expenses
affected their budgeting and financial management.
Misalignment of Budget Method, No Emergency Fund, and Poor Budgeting Strategy: These
statements, with a frequency of 4 and a percentage of 2.27%, indicate that students lacked
knowledge and skills in budgeting, leading to misalignment or poor budgeting strategies. Peer
pressure, limited income, and impulsive spending habits were some of the reasons for these
challenges.
Overall, these statements highlight the problems and challenges encountered by financial
management students in budgeting their allowances. This challenge has daily negative
consequences, emphasizing the importance of financial literacy and budgeting skills. The study
titled "A Descriptive Research on Allowance and Budget of ABM Senior High Students (Grade
11-12) of St. Michael's College in Iligan City" aimed to assess students' financial management
skills, their ability to manage their finances, and the impact of various variables on their
personal budgeting. The study concluded that students need to improve their budget planning
and recommended strategies to enhance their budgeting skills. Having good budgeting
strategies can save money and be used for future purposes, especially in investments. It is
crucial for students to gain knowledge and skills in handling their money early on to develop
responsible financial habits and secure their financial futures.
Proposed Investment Plan
50/30/20 BUDGET METHOD
Allocation Classification
50% Necessities
30% Unexpected Expenses
20% Savings
517 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
The 50/30/20 budget is a strategy that can be used to handle the allowance accordingly. The
table above shows the proposed investment plan of the researchers. The indicated weekly
allowance above was based on the findings. Fifty percent of the budget goes to necessities such
as groceries, food, toiletries, etc., while 30% is allocated for unexpected expenses, which were
found to be the most challenging issue for students. Instead of allocating 30% for wants, it is
better to allocate it to unexpected expenses. Lastly, 20% is allocated for savings, where
participants could save their excess money for emergency purposes.
Envelope Budget Method
Allocation Classification
Envelope 1 Needs
Envelope 2 Utility Bills
Envelope 3 School Allowance
Envelope 4 Fare Expenses
Envelope 5 School Expenses
Envelope 6 Savings
The Envelope Budget, also known as cash stuffing, is a traditional way of allocating the
allowance by putting money in respective envelopes according to its category. The table above
shows the proposed investment plan of the researchers. The items indicated in the table are
assumed classifications according to the basic needs of a student.
Envelope 1: The first allocation goes to the needs of students, such as food, hygiene kits,
toiletries, household necessities, etc.
Envelope 2: Utility Bills are one of the important allocations of the budget. It should be set
aside earlier so that on the day of payment, it would be easy to settle.
Envelope 3: It is essential that the school allowance is already set aside to lessen the shortage
of allowance, as students sometimes can’t prevent themselves from making impulsive
purchases. When they use the envelope method, it will give them a realization of how much
money they will spend in a week.
Envelope 4: Allocating Fare Expenses must also be placed in the envelope to avoid spending
money on other things. There may be enough or a little extra to put in the envelope that will be
exact for the fare for a week.
Envelope 5: Since there are unexpected school expenses such as photocopies of reviewers,
books needed only for a certain subject, and projects, it is a must to allocate a budget for school
expenses to avoid reducing the other allocated money, resulting in a shortage of allowance.
Lastly, Envelope 6: which is savings, is needed to save for other expenses and serves to get
money in times of emergency or in case they want to buy something unexpectedly important.
518 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
CONCLUSION
Based on the findings of the study, it can be concluded that the 50/30/20 budget and envelope
budgeting methods emerge as effective tools for fostering disciplined spending habits among
participants, and by combining these approaches, individuals can manage their money
strategically and practically. However, the challenges posed by unexpected expenses highlight
a critical aspect for improvement in financial planning education. By enhancing education in
this regard, individuals can develop a more comprehensive understanding of managing
unforeseen financial challenges, contributing to greater financial stability and preparedness in
the long term.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the conclusions of the study, the following recommendations are made:
The researchers advocate for budgeting systems that are realistic and adaptable to various
income levels in the 1,000–5,000 range, which is responsible for most of parents’ income.
The study suggests introducing the 50/30/20 and envelope budgeting method among
financial management students, emphasizing its usefulness in recognizing expenses and
easy to allocate money to essential categories and how effective it is at reducing excessive
spending temptations.
The researcher suggests that future researchers address alternative demographic
characteristics that may influence budgeting techniques among financial management
students, as current findings imply that gender and year level may not be major contributors.
The researcher also advises building forums or discussion groups where individuals may
share their experiences dealing with unforeseen expenses and collectively explore solutions
to foster an open communication culture among financial management students.
The researchers recommend creating financial literacy programs to teach students how to
successfully manage unexpected expenses.
The researchers recommend developing a peer mentoring program to boost knowledge
sharing among students and foster a team approach to resolving financial issues.
Bibliography
A. Journal
1) Bebasari & Istikomah (2020), The Effect of Investment Motivation, Financial Literation, and Financial
Behavior on Investment Decisions Journal of Research in Business, Economics, and education, 2(4), http://e-
journal.stie-kusumanegara.ac.id
2) Bona (2017), Doniego, N. (2021). Spending Practices and Money Management Strategies of Aspiring
Accountants. International Journal of arts, Sciences and Education, 2(1). https://www.ijase.org
3) Castaritas et al., (2020), Assessment on Effectiveness of Using 50-30-20 Rule in Improving Budgeting Skills
Students AscendensAsiaSingapore,2(1).https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com
519 | V 1 9 . I 0 5
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11384501
4) Chairani & Gunawan (2019). Effect of Financial Literacy and Lifestyle of Finance Student Behavior.
International Journal of Business Economics, 1(1). https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id
5) Contante et al., (2018-2019). Effects of Budgeting Students Allowance to the Academic Performance
Ascendens Asia Singapore, 1(1) aaresearchindex.com
6) Covaleski et al., (2006). Three Theoretical Perspectives and Criteria for Selective Integration
7) Journal of management Accounting Research, 15(1)587-624, https://www.researchgate.com
8) Deloso et al., (2019). Budgeting Strategies and Its Impact to the Financial Decision-Making Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research, 1(1). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com
9) Galperti, S. (2019). A Theory of Personal Budgeting.TheoreticalEconomics,14(1)173-210,
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
10) Hani et al., (2020). The Effect of Investment Education and Investment Experience on Investment Decision
with Financial Knowledge as Intervening Variable. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic
Sciences, 99(3):143-150, https://www.researchgate.net
11) Kumari,D., Lusardi, Singh & Kumar, Roy & Jane,(2020). The Impact of Financial Literacy on Investment
Decisions: With Special Reference to Undergraduates Aess Publications,4(2)110-126.
https://files.eric.ed.gov
12) Martinico et al., (2019). Proper Budgeting of Selected Grade 12 ABM Students: Basis for proposed
Guidelines in Handling Allowance. Ascendens Asia Singapore,1(1). aaresearchindex.com
13) Padil et al., (2021). Financial Literacy and Awareness of Investment Scams. Journal Of Financial
Crime ,10.1108. https://www.researchgate.net
14) Salonga et al., (2019-2020). Effectiveness of Using Budget Planner in Improving Allowance Management
of Grade 12 Abm Students Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1). (aaresearchindex.com)
15) Sewell & Rogers (2022). Assessing the Impact of a Personal Finance Elective Course on Student Attitudes
and Intentions. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(10). https://www.ajpe.org
B. Electronic Sources
1) Alfeche E.M. (2017-2018). Strategies in Budget Management of ST. MICHAELS College
StudentsAcademia, https://www.academia.edu/37221093/
2) Cruze, R (2022) Dave Ramsey’s Envelope System Explained Ramsey, https://www.ramseysolutions.com
3) Elizabeth Warren & Amelia Warren Tyagi (2005), All Your Worth: The Ultimate Lifetime Money Plan The
Mobile Bank, https://n26.com/en-eu/50-30-20-rule
4) Hamilton, J. (2020). The Importance of Budgeting during College Voices of Youth,
https://www.voicesofyouth.org
5) Lake, R. (2022) Envelope Saving Method: Budgeting Guide Smart asset, https://smartasset.com
6) Longa, I.V. (2017). Study of Spending Behavior Academia, https://www.academia.edu/31890676/
7) Mawadah & Ratno (2017). Factors Influencing Students’ Interest in Becoming Members of KSPM Doi,
https://doi.org
8) Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage Publications.
9) Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist,
34(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/
10) Somcio, A. (2019). Financial Literacy of Senior High School Students Academia,
https://www.academia.edu/
520 | V 1 9 . I 0 5