Applications_of_Robotics_in_Welding
Applications_of_Robotics_in_Welding
Abstract—
A programmable in three or more axes, which may be either fixed in place or mobile for use in
industrial automation applications. Technical innovations in robotic welding has facilitated manual
welding processes in sever working conditions with enormous heat and fumes to be replaced with robotic
welding. The robotic welding has greater capability to control robot motion, welding parameters and
enhanced wrong detection and wrong correction. Major difficulties in robotic welding are joint edge
inspection, weld penetration control, seam tracking of joints, and width or profile measurement of a joint.
These problems can be more easily solved by use of sensory feedback signals from weld joint. Robotic
welding system has intelligent and effective control system that can track the joint, monitor the joint in
process and accounts for variation in joint location. Sensors play an important role in robotic welding
systems with adaptive and intelligent control system features that can track the joint, account for variation in
joint location and geometry monitor in-process quality of the weld. In this paper various aspects of robotic
welding, robot programming, and problems associated with robot welding are undertaken.
Keywords— Robotic welding, sensors, robot programming, phases of welding, hindrances in robotic welding.
I. INTRODUCTION
According to the Robotics Institute of America, a robot is a “reprogrammable, multipurpose manipulator
devised to move, materials, tools, parts or specific devices, to variable programmed motions for the execution of
various kinds of tasks. With advance in prevailing manufacturing processes, it becomes a new way to realize
automatic, robotic, adaptable and innate welding manufacturing. Robot welding is common place in industrial
settings, and researchers continue to develop new welding methods and gain greater understanding of weld
quality. Mechanized tool and industrial welding have become crucial for industrial welding for mass production
because manual welding produces low production rates due to the sever work conditions and extreme physical
need [1]. As shown in Figure.1 [2-3] for small/medium production rates robotic production yields best cost per
unit performance in comparison to manual and difficult automation. Besides competitive unit costs, robotic
welding systems bring other advantages, such as enhanced productivity, safety, weld characteristics, flexibility
and workspace utilization, and economized labor cost. With increased applications of robotic welding
technology has reduce operator involvement and automated restrains over welding parameters, track of robotic
motion, wrong detection, and wrong alterations. Since the level of complication and refinement of the robotic
systems is large, their capability to adjust to real time variations in environmental condition are not equal to the
capability of human senses to adjust to the weld situations.
Welding forms an essential part of advanced manufacturing and robotic welding is a main symbol of
present welding technology [3].There are three important steps to realize automatic welding similar to welder.
The first step is to sense and grab information of the welding process, analogous to human sensing organs for
identifying the interior and exterior welding conditions; the second step is to detect characteristics of the
welding process, i.e. modeling of the welding dynamic process; the third is to develop the human-brain-like
controller to reason controlling actions. A large number of robots are in spot welding, material handling, spray
painting and arc welding. Spray painting and Spot welding applications are mostly in the automotive industry.
However, arc welding and material handling are used in a broad range of industries, such as, furniture
manufacturers, automobile sub-suppliers and agricultural machine manufacturers.
© www.ermt.net All Rights Reserved Page | 30
Majeed et al., International Journal of Emerging Research in Management &Technology
ISSN: 2278-9359 (Volume-7, Issue-3)
A. The Robot
A robot moves the weld torch along the weld path in a programmed direction. A robot consists of a vast number
of links and linkages, that are interlinked by gears, chains, belts etc. A large number of industrial robots are
driven by linear, hydraulic or pneumatic drivers and/or electric motors. Majority of high end robots are actuated
by AC servo motors which have replaced other actuators.
B. Controller
Controller gives signal to the drivers and motors by programmed instructions and location, velocity, and other
data received from different sensors. The controller manage not only robot but also any external equipment,
such as manipulators. When the system needs to weld a material that has intricate geometry, the synchronized
coordinated control of the entire controller is imminent [4].
C. Manipulators/Fixture
A manipulator is a tool that holds work piece and is displaced around for better reach and welding orientation. A
manipulator can be moved efficiently hard to reach locations easily. Welding can be done in a flat welding
D. Welding Torch
The torch grips the electrode in non-consumable electrode welding, to assure the flow of shielding gas to weld
pool and transfer of current to the electrode. Torches with welding current up to 200A are generally gas cooled
and for continuous operation between 200 and 500 A are water-cooled. Electrode feed unit and the welding
control mechanism in consumable electrode system are usually yielded in one synchronized package.
A. Preparation Phase
In preparation phase, the welder keeps together all parts to be welded such as equipments and the weld
parameters, along with the type of shielding gas and electrode. When offline programming is used, a robot
weld pre-program is available and placed online. Consequently, the robotic program then need only small
changes for calibration, which welder operator can do easily by performing preferred online simulations of the
process.
B. Welding Phase:
Automatic system must have same capacity as manual welding, i.e., the system should be capable of controlling
torch position that follows the required path (which may be distinct from planned), performing seam tracking,
and changing weld parameters in real time, thus follow the selected behavior of manual welders.
C. Analysis Phase
Genera phase where the welder investigate the weld to ascertain if it is acceptable or whether adjustments are
needed in the first two phases. Use of sensors facilitate execution of this phase online during the first phase
(welding phase).
All the above three welding phases must be considered while designing a fully automated welding
systems to attain best weld quality.
A. Manual methods
Manual methods are generally used for pick and place robots and are not suitable for robotic welding systems
[5].
B. Online programming
This method of robotic programming involves lead-through and walk-through programming. In the walk-
through programming, the operant moves the torch manually in the required sequence of movements, which are
recorded into the memory for playback during welding. The walk-through programming was used in a few early
welding robots 1[5] but did not proved useful. The conventional way for programming welding robots is online
programming with the aid of a teach pendant, i.e., lead-through programming. In this method, the programmer
moves the robot to the required orientation by control keys on the teaching pendant and the required orientation
and the respective motion sequences are recorded. The main drawback of the online teaching programming is
that the programming of the robot causes breaks in production during the programming phase [6].
C. Offline programming
In offline programming (OLP) the programming of weld path and sequence of operations are controlled by
computer rather than by the robot itself. OLP uses 3D CAD models of the robots, fixtures and workpieces used
in the cell. The 3D CAD models are compared through simulation software allowing programming of the
robot’s welding trajectory from a computer in place of a teaching pendant in the welding cell as in online
programming. After testing and simulation of the program, the teachings can be conveyed from the computer to
the robot controller through an Ethernet communication network. Recent research suggests, however, that the
use of sensors, it possible to completely program the final path only with OLP [7].
A. Increase in Productivity:
With a robots ability to process welded components three to five times faster than humans by operating
continuously, withstanding a greater arc on time and moving quickly between weld joint positions, a robotic
welding system can provide substantial increases in output.
C. Flexibility:
Manual welding processes require multiple jigs which are swapped out with each production run. Robots can
save valuable time and eliminate tool changes as grippers can grab any part regardless of size or shape, position
it on the assembly, and hold it tight during the welding process.
D. Safety:
Numerous safety risks exist for welders such as electric shock, exposure to gases and toxic fumes, and welder’s
flash burns to the eyes cornea. Robotic welders have proven themselves in reducing the number of accidents to
workers in the metal fabrication industry with the number of injuries reported to Safe Work Australia reducing
each year.
E. Quality:
A robotic welder can achieve superior quality by ensuring the correct welding angle, speed, and distance with
repeatability of accuracy of (+0.04mm). Ensuring that every single welding joint is consistently produced to the
highest quality significantly reduces the need for costly rework.
F. Labour:
With a shortage of skilled workers, robotic welders have helped to overcome this issue. Whilst manual welders
will still be required for jobs which have a high degree of customisation, a robotic welder will alleviate issues in
busy times by reducing additional hours and the need to hire and train extra staff.
G. Reduce Consumables:
With manual welding, the size of the weld is determined from the operator and could result in a larger weld than
required. Robots are programmed to always weld to the correct length and size of the joint requirement,
providing significant saving over time.
IX. CONCLUSION
The advancement in robot technique for welding have provided industry with potent technology that meet
almost every requirement. However there are number of problems and complexities associated with robot
welding system such as robots are hard to use, limited software interface, difficult to program etc. Nevertheless,
robots have significant advantages of producing parts with negligible defects using limited equipment. However
robot manufacturers are upgrading robots with higher accuracy, increased reach and low operating cost.
RERERENCES
[1] Laiping, C.Shanben and L. Tao, “The modeling of welding pool surface reflectance of aluminum alloy
pulse GTAW,” Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 394, no. 1–2, p. A 320–326, 2005.
[2] Pires, JN, Loureiro, A, Godinho T, Ferreira P, Fernando B, Morgado J, 2003.“Welding robots,” IEEE
Robotics & Automation Magazine, pp.45–55, 2003.
[3] Cui H, Dong J, Hou G, Xiao, Z, Chen, Y, & Zhao, Z.“Analysis on arc welding robot visual control
tracking system”, in 2013 International Conference on Quality, Reliability, Risk, Maintenance, and
Safety Engineering (QR2MSE).