An Analysis of Speaking Materials in English Textb
An Analysis of Speaking Materials in English Textb
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this research is to find the quality of materials in the English textbook for the tenth grade of
senior high school. This research focus on speaking material in the textbook for senior high school. This is
descriptive research. The data is the textbook assessment scores in the form quantitative data obtained through
the textbook evaluation sheet. The instrument was used to collect the data is the Textbook evaluation sheet.
The framework of the sheet is developed from theories of Sheldon (1988: 242-243), Cunningsworth (1995: 3-
4), Hammer (1998: 119-120), Rudby (2003), Bao (2013) and BSNP (2014) related to the criteria of right
textbook and learning materials selection. Based on the analysis, it was found that the speaking material of the
textbook adequate. It means that the speaking materials of the textbook do not fulfill the criteria based on the
theory.
One of the textbooks created by the government is assessment scores in the form of quantitative data obtained
"Bahasa Inggris" (English) textbook for English courses at through the textbook evaluation sheet. It developed from
the first grade of senior high school level. This textbook theories of Sheldon (1988: 242-243), Cunningsworth
has been implemented widely in Indonesia Senior high (1995: 3-4), Hammer (1998: 119-120), Rudby (2003), Bao
schools. Due to the extensive use of this textbook, it is (2013) and BSNP (2014) related to the criteria of right
expected could have significant contribution effects on textbook and learning materials selection. In collecting the
students' English proficiency. Unfortunately, the English data, there researcher explored the nature of the textbook
proficiency index (EPI) 2019 of Indonesian is at 61 st rank. following the stated aspect of content analysis. Then, the
However, there are many indicators used in determining assessment of the quality of the "Bahasa Inggris" textbook
the success of English Learning; textbook is one of the following the stated aspect of content analysis was carried
indicators of the successful. out by using a textbook evaluation checklist. The value of
As the preliminary interview with the English the quality of the "Bahasa Inggris" textbook as the data of
teacher discussing the Bahasa Inggris" (English) textbook, this research was collected. These values were then
they found that there are several weaknesses and analyzed by each aspect. Analysis the data based on the
deficiencies of speaking materials found in the "Bahasa value of each indicator performed at work. The data was
Inggris" (English) textbook, such as lack of materials, so also analyzed to see the extent to which aspects of content
that the teacher decides to use the other textbook or analysis perform the respective indicators. For further
additional sources. The second is a lack of exercise. In analysis, the descriptive analysis of each aspect of content
learning to speak, the student should give many drills to analysis was carried out to identify in-depth the performed
make them more enthusiastic in speaking activity, for score. It was to find the details of the strengths and
example, role play, monolog, and dialogue. In the teaching weaknesses of each aspect.
process, the teacher confuses to give exercises for students
because of the limitation of the material itself so that the
teacher used another textbook. This phenomenon leads the 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
teachers' creativity to create or compile additional sources The data of the content analysis of research was
for learning speaking. The third is not in line with the obtained through the textbook evaluation sheet. It
curriculum. The teacher thinks that the speaking materials comprised of the aspect of content analysis, which helped
of the textbook are low in selecting words and sentences. It the research mapping the nature of the textbook, focused
means that the level of language in the speaking material is on related analyzed aspects, and derived general
still under the target of the curriculum. The textbook conclusion on the content analysis of speaking materials.
content should be appropriate with the senior high school For the initial step of the research, the textbook was
standard. explored to identify the aspect of content analysis. In a
Encountering this situation, the Ministry of general preview, the textbook uses a genre-based approach
Education and Culture and National Education Standards in designing the materials. It has 15 chapters with the
Agency (BSNP) have prepared some criteria for speaking content focus of one genre for each chapter. Each chapter
materials. The textbook has been designed based on the consists of sections of warmer, vocabulary builder,
curriculum and these criteria. The criteria are; first, the pronunciation practice, dialog (only in chapter 3), reading,
speaking materials are related with listening materials and vocabulary exercises, grammar review, listening (only in
are delivered based on the level of difficulty. Second, the chapters 1, 6, 11, 12, and 14), speaking, writing, and
knowledge and speaking exercises are combined for reflection. It can be seen that each chapter has a content
speaking material by considering its relevance. Students’ focus for speaking materials and speaking activities, such
speaking skill are trained through speaking exercises. Both as vocabulary builder, pronunciation practice, and
speaking materials and exercise are develop the students speaking tasks
and teacher to have communication activities.. It also The next step was analyzing the content of
states the relevant learning objectives of communicative speaking materials by using a textbook evaluation sheet in
competence. It means that the right speaking materials the aspects of linguistics input, the material or content-
should cover all the student's needs in learning speaking. based and effective support provided in the book, the skills
Based on the explanation above, the researcher support provided for the students in the book. Besides, the
assumes that the speaking materials of the "Bahasa diversity and flexibility of the exercise book are also
Inggris" textbook need to be analyzed. So, in doing this analyzed. The data findings are as follow:
research, the content of speaking materials in the "Bahasa
Inggris" textbook for the tenth grade of the senior high 1. Linguistics Support
school published by Kementerian Pendidikan dan For linguistics support, there are three indicators
Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia third edition 2017. examine in the textbook. The analysis summary is as
follows:
2. METHOD
This was descriptive research. Descriptive research
would used data from a textbook about speaking materials
found in the textbook. The data was the textbook
91
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 463
92
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 463
activities. Most of the tasks are for pair work, and group The activities only ask the students to practice the
works. As the highest score in these aspects, the materials activities with an explanation of several situations with
have many activities that activate cultural and individual their strategies.
knowledge of the learners effectively. The value of skills support has 3,5 or in the
The materials should be achieved impact. The adequate category. The material is somewhat competent. It
material should help learners to feel at ease, and the somewhat fulfills the criteria in the sub-indicator clearly
material should help learners to develop confidence, what and effectively, and somewhat appropriate to the students.
is being taught should be perceived by the learner as There is only one indicator that has a value of 2. That is,
relevant and useful, materials should require and facilitate the activities provide learners with a wide range of
learner self-investment, the learner must be ready to communicative functions and strategies. There is a lack of
acquire the point being taught, the material should expose neither communicative function provided nor its strategies.
the learner to language in authentic use Tomlinson The activities only ask the students to practice the
(2011:8). In line with this, Brindly (1989) in Tomlinson activities with an explanation of several situations with
(2003) also indicates the importance of looking at both their strategies.
subjective needs and objective needs in the learners.
Subjective needs are the areas as the learners' speaking 4. Diversity and flexibility
proficiency, the learners' speaking difficulties, and real-life For diversity and flexibility, there are three
Conversational situations outside the classroom. Objective indicators examine in the textbook. The analysis summary
needs include the aspects as personality, Learning styles is as follows:
(Ardi, 2006), wants, and expectations of the course .
Table 4. Analysis of diversity and flexibility
3. Skills support An aspect Quality of
For skills support, there are four indicators examine Indicators of Content Content
of Content
in the textbook. The analysis summary is as follows: Analysis
Analysis
14. The materials flexible 3
Table 3. Analysis of skills support Diversity to serve more than
An Quality and one type of learning
aspect of of flexibility style, proficiency,
Indicators of Content Analysis
Content Content maturity, and interest
Analysis 15. Activities cover a 2
10. Speaking activities give 4 variety of different
Skills students opportunities to proficiency levels
support share and process 16. The materials 2
information provide a variety of
11. The language presented and 4 speaking activities
organized to facilitate Sub-score 2.3
verbal discussion
Category Poor
effectively
12. The activities provide 2 The value of Diversity and flexibility aspects is 2,3
learners with a wide range or in the category of Poor. It is generally inappropriate to
of communicative functions fulfill the criteria in the sub-indicator, generally
and strategies inappropriate to the students. It is caused by the materials
13. Speaking activities provide 4 are not stretchy to provide more possibilities to the
several forms of students’ that have various learning styles, ability, likes,
interpersonal interest, and maturity. The materials are provided only for
communication, such as one level of proficiency. Due to the lack of the variation of
monolog, dialog, and group materials, it cannot accommodate various interests and
discussion learning styles.
Sub-score 3.5 The overall value of the materials is 2.94 or in the
Category Adequate category of adequate. The material is somewhat
competent. It somewhat fulfills the criteria in the sub-
The value of skills support has a 3,5 or an adequate indicator clearly and effectively, and somewhat
category. The material is somewhat competent. It appropriate to the students. The summary of the evaluation
somewhat fulfills the criteria in the sub-indicator clearly is as follows:
and effectively, and somewhat appropriate to the students.
There is only one indicator that has a value of 2. That is,
the activities provide learners with a wide range of
communicative functions and strategies. There is a lack of
neither communicative function provided nor its strategies.
93
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 463
94
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 463
[4] Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An [23] Witanurhikmah (2016). The Analysis of English
Interactive Approach to Language pedagogy 2nd Textbook Used in the First Grade of Senior High
Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc School Based on Curriculum 2013. The State
[5] Brown, H. D., 2004. Teaching by Principals: An University of Medan.
Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy,
Second Edition. New York: Longman, Inc.
[6] BSNP, (2008), Instrumen penilaian
[7] Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your
Coursebook. Macmillan Heineman.
[8] Finochiaro, (1974), English as A Second
Language: From Theory to Practice. New
YorkRegent publishing
[9] Gall, Meredith D, Gall Joyce P, and Borg Walter
R. 2007, Educational Research. New York:
Pearson Eduaction, Inc.
[10] Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the
Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University
Press
[11] Luoma, Sari, 2004. Assessing Speaking. United
Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
[12] Maleong, Lexy J. 2005. Metode Penelitian
Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
[13] Marta, Randi, Evri, (2015), An Analysis of
Speaking Materials in an English Textbook Entitle"
Talk Active" Based on Tomlinson's Theory.
Unpublished Thesis: English department, FBS
State University
[14] Nunan, Daid (1991), Language Teaching
Methodology: NewYork. Practice hall
[15] Richard, JC. 2008. Teaching Listening and
Speaking: from theory to practice. New York:
Cambridge University press
i. Tarigan, H.G. dan Djago T. (1986). Telaah Buku
Teks Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Angkasa
[16] Tomlinson, Brian. 2001. Materials development. In
R. Carter, & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge
guide to teaching English to speakers of other
languages (pp. 66-71). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
[17] Tomlinson, Brian, 2003. Descriptive Materials for
Language Teaching, London: Cromwell Press,
Trowbridge, Wiltshire.
[18] Thornbury, Scott (2005). How to Teach Speaking,
New York: Longman
[19] Sahrulaziz, An Analysis of the Quality of Reading
Materials in
"BahasaInggrisforSMA/SMK/MAKStudentsXI"
Textbook. http:/www.readabilityformulas
[20] Sanpol, Nilima, and Valias, 2009. Measuring the
Difference: An Outcome Evaluation Resource for
the Disability Sector". The Albert Council and of
Disability of Services
[21] Sudjana, (2001), Metode Statistika. Bandung:
Tarsito
[22] Vogt, W. Paul. 1999. Dictionary of Statistics and
Methodology. California: Sage Thousand Oaks.
95