Hogan HiPo 360_Technical Reference & Admin Guide
Hogan HiPo 360_Technical Reference & Admin Guide
1. Introduction 5
1.1 Development of the Hogan High Potential 360 5
1.2 The Hogan High Potential 360 Model 5
1.3 Applications of the Hogan High Potential 360 6
3. Benchmark Data 15
6. References 24
7. Appendix 26
Sample Individual Report 26
3
1.
introduction
4
There has been an increased awareness of the importance of identifying and developing high potential
employees in order to cultivate an effective and promising leadership pipeline (Conger & Fulmer, 2003;
Groves, 2007; Stahl et al., 2012). This has resulted in various types of assessments increasingly being
used to help identify and develop high-potential employees (Church & Rotolo, 2013; Church et al.,
2015). For instance, Church and colleagues (2015) found that 80% of top companies use assessments
extensively for high-potential employees, with the majority of these companies viewing assessments as
having a moderate to heavy impact on organisational results (Church et al., 2015). Similarly, in a global
survey conducted by Peter Berry Consultancy in 2017, over 80% of the respondents advised that their
organisation currently uses validated psychometric assessments to identify and develop high performing
employees. The most common type of assessment used was personality-based assessments, however,
multi-rater, cognitive ability, skills-based and values-based assessments were also reported to be used.
One type of assessment that is likely to be particularly beneficial in enhancing the development of high-
potential employees is multi-rater assessments such as 360 feedback. Various research has shown that
when multi-rater assessments are used appropriately they can have a broad range of benefits for both
individuals and organisations (e.g. Garavan & Morley, 1997; London & Beatty, 1993; McCarthy & Garavan,
2001). However, there is currently a need for multi-rater assessments that are specifically designed to
measure competencies associated with leadership potential, such as those identified in the Hogan High
Potential 360 Model (Hogan Assessment Systems, 2017).
5
Leadership Foundations concerns the degree to which people are rewarding to deal with and good
organisational citizens. The three competencies underlying the Leadership Foundations dimension are:
• Getting Along: being cooperative, pleasant and rewarding to deal with
• Thinking Broadly: being able to solve a wide range of business-related problems by adopting
a strategic perspective and thinking outside the box
• Following Process: complying with organisational rules and conventions
Leadership Emergence concerns the degree to which people stand out from their peers, build business
relationships and networks, exercise influence and seem leader-like. The three competencies underlying
the Leadership Emergence dimension are:
• Standing Out: making others’ aware of one’s contributions
• Building Connections: creating networks and business relationships
• Influencing Others: persuading co-workers to pursue certain desired outcomes
Leadership Effectiveness concerns the degree to which people are able to build and maintain high-
performing teams and push those teams to accomplish organisational outcomes. The three competencies
underlying the Leadership Effectiveness dimension are:
• Leading People: persuading people to put aside personal agendas and pursue shared goals
• Leading the Business: achieving critical business unit or organisational outcomes
• Managing Resources: securing, optimising and deploying key material, financial and
personnel assets effectively
Specifically, the tool enables individuals to identify and build upon their strengths and development
opportunities, using a feedback process that is specifically designed to help them reach their potential.
The multi-rater aspect of the Hogan High Potential 360 ensures evaluations are elicited from multiple
sources from within the individual’s work circle. These diverse perspectives help to provide a real-time
snapshot of a person’s attitude, behaviour and performance, and reveal strengths and development
opportunities that may not be seen from a single perspective.
Self-awareness is also a critical component of development. We can compare a person’s ‘self’ scores with
other raters’ scores, to gain an understanding of their level of self-awareness. Specifically, when a person’s
‘self’ scores are similar to other raters’ scores, this typically indicates greater self-awareness. Where
there is discrepancy, such as consistently over-rating or under-rating their capability, this opens up an
opportunity for a coaching discussion around confidence versus competence (Chamorro-Premuzic, 2013).
Self-awareness is a meta-competency critical for any meaningful development (Goleman, 2002).
6
Applications of the Hogan High Potential 360 include:
• Self-awareness and career development
• Talent identification
• High potential development
• Succession planning
• Leadership development
Although the Hogan High Potential 360 report is useful alone, it is much more effective to combine the
behavioural ratings with results from other assessments. Providing additional sources of information helps
to increase the depth and breadth of an individual’s awareness and enhances the impact of the results.
The Hogan High Potential 360 can also be readministered once the individual has had sufficient time to
make changes (e.g. 12 months). A comparison of the initial and subsequent scores can help identify and
track changes in behaviour and performance.
7
2.
Structure
of the hogan
High Potential 360
8
The Hogan High Potential 360 contains:
• 58 Scaled items
• 26 Ranked Strengths
• 26 Ranked Opportunities to Improve
• Open ended comments
• Development plan
• Appendices
LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONS
Getting Along
This person has the right knowledge and ability to be very effective
This person often suggests new and original ideas
This person thinks long-term about new opportunities
This person stays up-to-date with current developments in his/her field
This person effectively solves important business problems
This person takes a strategic perspective when solving problems
Following Process
9
Table 1: Scaled Items (continued)
LEADERSHIP EMERGENCE
Standing Out
Leading People
This person encourages those working in different areas to pull together to achieve common goals
This person always looks for improvement opportunities and to deliver better results
This person effectively manages resources to achieve outcomes
This person responds flexibly to changes in organisational requirements
This person is comfortable taking calculated risks
10
2.2 Strengths and Opportunities Rankings
In addition to the 58 scaled items, raters are asked to identify the ratee’s top four strengths and top
four opportunities to improve. Respondents are asked to select the top four in each section, where the
top ranked item is allocated four (4) points, the second highest ranked item three (3) points, the third
highest ranked item two (2) points, and the fourth ranked item one (1) point. The totals presented in the
Hogan High Potential 360 Report are the summation of these presented in decreasing order of selection
frequency multiplied by the weighting of the selection. These items are presented in Tables 2 and 3.
Top Strengths
11
Table 3: Top Opportunities to Improve Items
Top Opportunities
2.3 Comments
The Hogan High Potential 360 includes a section where raters can provide qualitative feedback. They are
invited to provide feedback on:
1. The person’s leadership potential
2. What the person needs to develop to fulfil their potential as a leader
3. The person’s general opportunities to improve
12
2.4 Development Plan
This section of the Hogan High Potential 360 Report provides a place for the individual to create a
personal development plan. This plan should include behaviours that they want to keep doing, start doing
and stop doing. These actions should be achievable and represent changes that the person would like
to make based on the feedback provided in their report. They can use the Development Commitment
framework that provides for actions to take, support/resources required, realistic timeframes for
achievement and measures of success.
2.5 Appendices
The Hogan High Potential 360 appendices consist of:
1. Appendix I: Tables showing rater frequencies by items which contain the standard deviations
and frequency distributions by rater group for each of the scaled items.
2. Appendix II: Tables showing rater frequencies by strengths and opportunities which display a
count of the number of times each strength or opportunity was given the weight of 1, 2, 3 or 4.
This is based on the top selection per rater being given a weight of 4, the second selection a
weight of 3, the third selection a weight of 2 and the fourth selection a weight of 1.
13
3.
Benchmark Data
14
Although an individual’s scores can inform their own relative strengths and opportunities, further value is
added when they are compared to a frame of reference to identify strengths and opportunities relative to
others. For this reason, the Hogan High Potential 360 includes a global benchmark sample that allows
individuals to evaluate their strengths and opportunities against a global sample of leaders and a broader
worldwide standard.
Statistical analysis of the items was conducted upon the benchmark sample. The Mean and Standard
Deviation (SD) of each item is presented in Table 4.The Mean is the average score out of 7, the SD is the
average deviation of ratings from the Mean.
15
Table 4: Hogan High Potential 360 Item Descriptive Statistics (continued)
16
Tables 5 and 6 show the rank order of strengths and opportunities for improvement from highest to
lowest priority based on what raters observed. The “Weighted Sum” refers to the attribute selected and
weighted according to how highly it was ranked by the rater. The “No of Responses” refers to how many of
the raters chose that attribute - they were required to select a maximum of 4 items out of 26.
Table 5: Hogan High Potential 360 Response Rankings for Top Four Strengths
17
Table 6: Hogan High Potential 360 Response Rankings for Top Four Opportunities to Improve
1 Stop taking on too much and spreading yourself too thin 68586 24988
2 Challenge poor performance 58301 22815
3 Delegate more 55285 21051
4 Motivate others and improve morale 46940 18952
5 Show leadership on issues 42904 17018
6 Share knowledge and resources 42303 16806
7 Give appropriate feedback 39974 16503
8 Set clear goals and performance indicators 38488 15564
9 Be more available and visible in the workplace 38454 15139
10 Communicate better 37208 14893
11 Look at the big picture - the organisation’s overall goals 36178 14186
12 Listen more and let others have their say 35974 14179
13 Be more assertive 35875 13732
14 Build more effective relationships 34961 14087
15 Improve your time management and organisational skills 34470 13559
16 Improve your people and interpersonal skills 31716 12410
17 Be more action-oriented and make it happen 26430 10441
18 Be more open to change 23138 9434
19 Acquire better job and/or industry knowledge 22498 8868
20 Be more empathetic 20701 8349
21 More customer and/or client focus 17367 7040
22 Be more of a team player 17301 7062
23 Treat people fairly and without favouritism 16859 7022
24 Be less aggressive 15353 6229
25 Be less moody and control your temper 14909 6047
26 Be more positive 14292 5850
18
4.
Administering
the hogan
High Potential 360
19
4.1 Administration
The Hogan High Potential 360 is typically administered online and takes approximately 15-20 minutes to
complete. Respondents are sent an email with a link that directs them to the Hogan High Potential 360
survey. Reminder emails can be sent if surveys are not being completed within the desired timeframes.
20
5.
Additional
available
resources
21
The following additional resources are available to support use of the Hogan High Potential 360:
1. Hogan High Potential 360 Feedback Guide: this feedback guide is designed to assist
practitioners with providing feedback on the Hogan High Potential 360 Report. It contains a
checklist that practitioners can follow to ensure the key sections of the Hogan High Potential
360 Report are debriefed effectively.
2. Hogan High Potential 360 Development Activities Guide: this guide is designed for
practitioners using the Hogan High Potential 360 Report with high potential employees. It
includes information on how to best structure the feedback/coaching session, focuses on the
most common opportunities to improve and provides relevant questions for coaches to explore
with the high potential employee to create two-way conversations. Specific development
actions are provided to support these discussions and enhance the high potential employee’s
leadership competencies.
22
6.
References
23
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2013). Confidence: Overcoming low self-esteem, insecurity, and self-doubt.
London: Profile Books Ltd.
Church, A. H., & Rotolo, C. T. (2013). How are top companies assessing their high-potentials and senior
executives? A talent management benchmark study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and
Research, 65, 199-223.
Church, A. H., Rotolo, C. T., Ginther, N. M., & Levine, R. (2015). How are top companies designing and
managing their high-potential programs? A follow-up talent management benchmark study. Consulting
Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 67, 17-47.
Conger, J. A. & Fulmer, R. M. (2003). Developing your leadership pipeline. Harvard Business Review, 81,
76-85.
Garavan, T. N., Morley, M., & Flynn, M. (1997). 360° degree feedback: its role in employee development.
Journal of Management Development, 16, 134-147.
Goleman, D. (2002). Primal Leadership: Realizing the Power of Emotional Intelligence. Boston,
Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Groves, K. S. (2007). Integrating leadership development and succession planning best practices. Journal
of Management Development, 26, 239-260.
Hogan Assessment Systems (2017). High Potential Talent Report Technical Manual (1st Edition).
London, M., & Beatty, R. W. (1993). 360‐degree feedback as a competitive advantage. Human Resource
Management, 32, 353-372.
McCarthy, A. M., & Garavan, T. N. (2001). 360° feedback process: Performance, improvement and
employee career development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 25, 5-32.
Peter Berry Consultancy Pty Ltd & Hogan Assessment Systems Inc. (2015). Hogan 360 Technical Manual
(1st Edition). North Sydney, Australia: Peter Berry Consultancy.
Peter Berry Consultancy Pty Ltd (2017). Global Talent Survey on High Potential Talent Management - 2017.
Stahl, G., Björkman, I., Farndale, E., Morris, Shad. S., Paauwe, J., Stiles, P., Trevor, J. & Wright, P. (2012).
Six principles of effective global talent management. Sloan Management Review, 53, 25-42.
24
7.
Appendix
25
sample individual report
26
27
Peter Berry Consultancy Pty Ltd
[email protected] | www.peterberry.com.au
SYDNEY OFFICE
T: +61 2 8918 0888 | F: +61 2 9929 5582
Level 8, 201 Miller Street, North Sydney, NSW 2060
MELBOURNE OFFICE
T: +61 3 9600 4300 | F: +61 3 9600 4233
Suite 303, 430 Little Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000
No part of this work may be copied, reproduced or transferred to any other form or expression
without the expressed written consent of Peter Berry Consultancy Pty Ltd.