5_Investment_Rules
5_Investment_Rules
Answer:
Cash PV of
Year Flow Cash Flow
0 $ (100,000) $ (100,000) YES! The NPV is
1 $ 33,000 $ 29,464 greater than $0.
2 $ 38,000 $ 30,293 Therefore, the
3 $ 43,000 $ 30,607
4 $ 48,000 $ 30,505 investment does return
5 $ 53,000 $ 30,074 at least the required
rate of return.
Net Present Value $ 50,943
Why Use Net Present Value?
• Accepting positive NPV projects benefits
shareholders.
✓NPV uses cash flows
✓NPV uses all relevant cash flows of the project
✓NPV discounts the cash flows properly
• Reinvestment assumption: the NPV rule assumes
that all cash flows can be reinvested at the discount
rate.
Questions
• What is the net present value rule?
• If we say an investment has an NPV of
$1,000, what exactly do we mean?
1Why Use Net Present Value?
• Disadvantages:
– Ignores the time value of money
– Ignores cash flows after the payback period
– Biased against long-term projects
– Requires an arbitrary acceptance criteria
– A project accepted based on the payback criteria
may not have a positive NPV
The Payback Period Method
• Advantages:
– Easy to understand
– Managerial control
– Quick cash recovery
Questions
• In words, what is the payback period? The
payback period rule?
• Why do we say that the payback period is,
in a sense, an accounting break-even
measure?
1Why Use Net Present Value?
0 1 2 3
-$200
The internal rate of return for this project is 19.44%
$ 50 $ 100 $ 150
NPV = 0 = − 200 + + +
(1 + IRR ) (1 + IRR ) (1 + IRR ) 3
2
NPV Payoff Profile
If we graph NPV versus the discount rate, we can see the IRR
as the x-axis intercept.
0% $100.00 $120.00
4% $73.88 $100.00
8% $51.11 $80.00
12% $31.13 $60.00
16% $13.52 $40.00 IRR = 19.44%
NPV
• Disadvantages:
–Does not distinguish between investing and
financing
–There may be multiple IRRs
–Problems with mutually exclusive investments: the
scale and timing problem
Problems with IRR
❑ Investing or Financing?
❑ Multiple IRRs
❑ The Scale Problem
❑ The Timing Problem
Independent vs
Mutually Exclusive Projects
• Independent Projects: accepting or rejecting
one project does not affect the decision of the
other projects.
– Must exceed a MINIMUM acceptance criteria
• Opportunity 1 or 2?
• Incremental IRR
• 0=-$15+$25/(1+IRR)
• IRR=66.67%>25%
• NPV of incremental cash flows:
• -$15+$25/1.25=$5
The Scale Problem
• One of three ways:
• 1. Compare the NPVs of the two projects;
• 2. Calculate the incremental NPV from making the
large project instead of the small one;
• 3. Compare the incremental IRR to the discount
rate.
• All three approaches always give the same
decision. However, we must not compare the
IRRs of the two projects.
The Timing Problem
The Timing Problem
• Ranking Criteria:
– Select alternative with highest PI
Example: The Profitability Index
• Project 1
• $70.5=$70/1.12+$10/(1.12)2
• 3.53=$70.5/$20
The Profitability Index
• Disadvantages:
–Problems with mutually exclusive investments: the
scale problem
–The incremental analysis
The Profitability Index
• Advantages:
–May be useful when available investment funds are
limited: capital rationing
Project A Project B
CF0 -$200.00 -$150.00
PV0 of CF1-3 $241.92 $240.80
$300
IRR 1(A) IRR (B) IRR 2(A)
$200
$100
$0
-15% 0% 15% 30% 45% 70% 100% 130% 160% 190%
($100)
($200)
Project A
Discount rates
Cross-over Rate Project B
Summary
• Net present value
– NPV=Total PV of future project CF’s less the Initial Investment
– Minimum Acceptance Criteria: Accept if NPV > 0
– Ranking Criteria: Choose the highest NPV