The Learning Professional October 2017
The Learning Professional October 2017
THE
PROFESSIONAL THE LEARNING FORWARD JOURNAL
Reflecting
on practice
• Video
for formative
assessment p. 24
• Literacy
classroom
visits p. 30
• Project-based
learning p. 35
• Coaching
with video p. 40
• Professional
dialogue p. 46
EDU160615
APPLY TODAY.
learn.regent.edu | 888.713.1595
Christian Leadership to Change the World
On Campus & Online
LEARNING
THE
PROFESSIONAL THE LEARNING FORWARD JOURNAL
THE PROFESSIONAL LEARNING ASSOCIATION
8 CALL TO ACTION
By Stephanie Hirsh Your voice, impact data, and
Greatness is within the stories can help (lawmakers)
grasp of every teacher.
appreciate what is actually
No matter how much say
happening in today’s classrooms,
a teacher has in district-led
schools, and communities.
professional learning, he
— Melinda George, p. 12
or she can push personally
toward excellence.
I realize that I am more than a
10 ASK member of a foundation, I am part
By Michelle Bowman King of a learning culture.
Are conferences — Janice Bradley, p. 13
and workshops valid
and effective?
A conference or workshop
can be effective depending on 12 OUR TAKE 13 WHAT I'VE LEARNED
the purpose and design of the By Melinda George By Janice Bradley
learning and what happens Educators have the clout More than a money
before and after. to carry our message manager, our foundation
to Congress. centers on learning.
Learning Forward members' Raising money and giving
stories are making a grants is a mission of
difference with the U.S. the Learning Forward
Senate as members consider Foundation, but its work is
Title IIA funding. based on the principles of
continuous learning.
22 ESSENTIALS
Keeping up with hot topics.
• An inside look at schools
• Social and emotional
30 Leading the way challenges: the continuous
in literacy: coming and going of
learning
Classroom visits offer international teachers
• PDK poll
a comprehensive view and a need to create a
• Learner-centered schools
of teaching and learning. culture for coaching. To
By Bonnie Houck address these challenges,
FOCUS 23 and Sandi Novak the school’s instructional
Many districts need clear coaches developed project-
REFLECTING ON PRACTICE classroom data focused on based learning professional
the literacy culture and development to build a
24 Accentuate instructional practices collaborative culture that is
the formative: being implemented in each aligned with the school’s goal
Michigan teachers use school. Understanding of a guaranteed and viable
rubrics and video these elements is crucial for curriculum.
to improve their practice. success, and this is where
By Theron Blakeslee, Denny the Literacy Classroom Visit 40 Replay, reflect, refine:
Chandler, Edward Roeber, Model can make a difference. Video-based coaching
and Tara Kintz Districts can use these data accelerates teacher growth.
Researchers from the to design plans and help By David Baker, Catherine
Formative Assessment for outline the best strategies for Carter, Patricia Hagan,
Michigan Educators (FAME) reaching goals. Temple Hayles, Rychie Rhodes,
project of the Michigan and Karen Smith
Department of Education 35 Process for discovery: One challenge the traditional
worked with eight Michigan Project-based learning coaching cycle presents is
teachers to observe in their builds teachers’ that the data collection and
classrooms, video their collaboration skills. reflection are driven by the
teaching, and then use By Andrew Miller coach’s memory. With a
rubrics to analyze and reflect The Shanghai American video-based coaching cycle,
on their teaching. School in China faced two the observation is done via
52 I am mentor, I am coach:
Effective mentors help new
leaders develop their own
strengths.
By Donna Augustine-Shaw
and Marceta Reilly
Being a mentor isn’t about
merely being a kind buddy
to help new leaders learn the TOOLS 57
ropes. It’s about coaching
them to become clear about
their own values, beliefs, 58 Tying it all together:
and strengths. From this Defining the roles and
video, meaning that the self-knowledge, new leaders responsibilities that
lesson can be replayed as can step into their leadership contribute to coherence
many times as desired and roles with authenticity. from Becoming a Learning
the lesson is grounded, not This is the solid basis for Team.
by perception and memory, authority and respect.
but in reality so the teacher
can see the lesson through
UPDATES 67
her own eyes.
FEATURED SPEAKERS
Joellen Killion Marcia Tate Bruce Joyce
Charlotte Danielson Laura Lipton Gene Hall
Jim Knight Bruce Wellman
Tracy Crow
W
hile I’m excited that the focus improve in the future, or asking team
of this issue — Reflecting members to share a question or feeling
on Practice — allows us they have as they leave.
to explore the many opportunities
educators have to take a close look at Reflection on new information:
how they teach, I want to flip that phrase Many learning designs build in reflection
and consider what it means when we as an integral part of a learning
practice reflecting. experience. Taking time to reflect
The pace of this 24/7 world doesn’t after reading an article, engaging in
lend itself to reflection, yet we’re more a facilitated meeting, or watching a
in need of the practice of reflection than video can help learners make their
ever. Reflection is an opportunity to thinking explicit and raise questions for
make meaning of what we experience, themselves or others. For some learners,
and without explicit attention to its writing in a journal may serve this
practice, experiences can flow by and purpose well. For others, a two- or three-
be quickly forgotten as the next priority way conversation might be a valuable
pops up. The Standards for Professional way to extend their learning. Debriefing
Learning include reflection as a critical with others can bring new perspectives
part of the Learning Communities to consider and open learners’ eyes to
standard, within the cycle of continuous new understandings.
improvement; within the Learning
Designs standard, where reflection is We invite you to find other ways of
often part of effective learning strategies; unexpected challenges or surprises, and practicing reflection throughout this
and in the Implementation standard, what you learned. A couple of minutes issue of The Learning Professional. We’re
where reflection is a critical form of of reflection at the beginning of your day also eager to hear what works for you!
feedback for self and others. allows you to remind yourself of lessons Please get in touch any time.
What might the practice of reflection learned as you look ahead to the day’s
look like in a busy professional’s work priorities. Special note to readers: We
week? Here are a few strategies to apologize for the delay in your member
consider: Reflection as part of conversations publications while we experience
or meetings: While careful agendas staffing transitions. We said goodbye
Reflection as an element of and team norms help to make a group’s recently to Eric Celeste as editor of
planning: As you make your to-do collaborative work more productive, The Learning Professional and we look
list for the day or week, build in time time for reflection at the end of meetings forward to what comes next.
— even as little as five minutes — at can help a team function at higher levels •
the beginning and end of each day as well as serve as reminders of promises Tracy Crow (tracy.crow@
to make note of how you spent your made. Reflection might be as simple learningforward.org) is director
time, where you were successful, what as asking whether the team followed of communications at Learning
you might celebrate, where you found its norms and where it might need to Forward. ■
ARE CONFERENCES
AND WORKSHOPS
VALID AND EFFECTIVE? p. 10
Stephanie Hirsh
A
s part of my participation in Find The State of Teacher Professional learning that focuses on this priority.
the Redesign PD Partnership, Learning at www.learningforward.org/ Every teacher can develop a
I had the opportunity to learn teacher-report. professional growth plan to strengthen
from Brian Dassler, an amazing educator teaching expertise, determine learning
and deputy chancellor in the Florida this question and potentially shift some priorities, and set a plan of actions to
Department of Education. Dassler, who of that responsibility to include more address them. Supervisors, coaches, and
died suddenly in March, advocated for a teachers. There are many ways teachers peers can be great sources of support.
deep appreciation of the complexity of can engage in powerful professional Every teacher can ask for feedback
teaching. He challenged us to describe learning that do not require approval from and support about how to improve
great teaching, and I realized that talking another person and that demonstrate the her teaching. When teachers can’t
knowledgeably about what makes power of self-directed learning. access feedback from peers, coaches,
teaching effective isn’t something that Engaging in such learning, both or supervisors, there are other sources
even experienced experts in education as individuals and in teams, can lead to tap, including online services and
can all do. to teachers gaining responsibility for communities, external partners, and
Great teaching does not occur planning and executing professional students.
by accident. It is developed through learning that impacts teams, schools, Every teacher can set aside regular
an intentional process that ideally and entire systems. More importantly, time for reflection on teaching. There
includes study, practice, feedback, the kinds of learning I am talking about are countless tools to assist teachers in
reflection, and more practice. It is a potentially have the most impact on capturing their practice in the classroom
continuous improvement process what happens for students every day. and protocols to support reflection.
that defines the core work of our most I have never met a teacher who does Student work and surveys can also
successful teachers. Reflecting on these not want the very best for the students in provide rich material for deep reflection.
conversations with Dassler leads me to her charge. I have met teachers who are While debates will continue about
ask: How do we ensure all teachers have frustrated because they do not have the who has the authority to allocate
the opportunity to develop a profound tools or expertise to address the diverse district time and dollars for professional
understanding of teaching? needs of their students. I have met learning, it gives me hope to know that,
Considering this question led me to teachers who are looking for support ultimately, teachers have authority and
wonder about a particular finding in The in addressing some of their greatest autonomy over the most important
State of Teacher Professional Learning, challenges. I have met teachers who, purpose for professional learning:
a survey Learning Forward conducted while content with their student results, improving their practice so that more
with Corwin and NEA. Just over half believe there are things they could do to students achieve better outcomes.
of teachers who responded said they get even better outcomes. Learning Forward is committed to
have “some say” in decisions about Every teacher has the ultimate supporting our stakeholders in achieving
their professional development. My authority to ensure she is the very best this purpose through resources,
assumption is that teachers responding teacher she can be, and the central information, and services.
to this question focused on professional responsibility associated with that is to •
development that was planned and understand the complexities of skillful Stephanie Hirsh (stephanie.hirsh@
executed at the district or school level. and effective teaching. Every teacher has learningforward.org) is executive
I wonder if there is another way to ask the authority to engage in professional director of Learning Forward. ■
Q
In our district we have been redefining what professional learning looks like, transitioning to more job-
embedded, school-based learning supported by coaches or in some cases school leaders or lead teachers.
Given how the Standards for Professional Learning describe effective professional learning, not to mention
the definition of professional development in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), I’m wondering whether
conferences and workshops still have a role in how we support educators? What can we do to make sure that learning from
such standalone experiences has an impact?
participants generally have the option to and conquer to cover more ground at taking deliberate actions to extend what
make choices about the sessions they will an event. they learned. Some educators may find
attend, matching what they understand After a workshop or conference, this networking opportunity online
about a session with a need they know educators are more likely to experience as well as on their campuses. For still
they have. With the right conference, lasting benefits — and see changes others, bringing the learning home may
the learning may complement ongoing, in practice — if they have sustained mean enlisting outside vendors to help
embedded learning, for example, if support for new learning at their a team or district go deep on a new
educators find options to learn about worksite. For some learners, this may initiative or strategy.
strategies they’ve identified in a learning mean that experts at home, whether Ultimately, we believe that
team cycle of improvement. Educators in their building or colleagues from conference and workshop learning
also may have the opportunity to attend the district office, are available to co- does have a role to play in an effective
conferences with teammates. In such teach using new strategies or observe professional learning plan, and it
cases, they can plan to either attend and offer feedback. For others, support doesn’t happen by accident. Planning,
sessions together, knowing that different may come in the form of networking onsite engagement, and ongoing
learners will bring different perspectives with other educators who experienced support are essential to making
to a session, or they can choose to divide the conference or with team members conference learning meaningful. ■
Melinda George
I
n March 2017, the education
community woke to a daunting
professional learning crisis: The Trump Your participation is already
Administration’s 2018 budget proposed making a difference — we
elimination of the Supporting Effective
Instruction State Grants Program (Title
have confirmation from
II, Part A of the Every Student Succeeds Senate staff that
Act). As educators face increasingly higher they are hearing
demands for student outcomes in a more
diverse population, it’s astonishing that from our
the administration would even consider community.
eliminating the only dedicated source of
federal funding for professional learning
and educator support.
For several months, Learning Forward
has been asking each of you to help Your participation is already making
Learn more about advocating for
us contact every member of the U.S. Title II and increased spending a difference — we have confirmation
Congress to let them know how critical caps at www.learningforward. from Senate staff that they are hearing
Title IIA funds are to your work, your org/advocacy. from our community about Title IIA.
students, and your communities. If this And, thanks in part to your powerful
is the first time you’ve been directly stories, the Senate included level
asked to advocate for any cause, you happening in today’s classrooms, funding for Title IIA in their version of the
may be asking, “Who, me? What could I schools, and communities. You are appropriations bill. But this is an ongoing
possibly share that would be of interest particularly qualified to highlight where battle, not simply a one-time fight. We
to lawmakers?” I’m here to tell you that real needs exist. all need to be vigilant and determined
you are perfect for this job. Members of Congress and their staff to see this through for the long-term.
As experts in education and as voters, want to hear from you whether they Whether for Title II or for other education
you are exactly the right messengers to support Title IIA funding or are opposed priorities, we will always need to make
help lawmakers understand that Title to it. As supporters, they will use your the case that professional learning
IIA funding is critical to our country’s experiences to make the case for Title IIA requires ongoing, significant support
educational and economic success. funding amongst their colleagues. If they whether at the national, provincial, state,
Lawmakers are not often educators, are opposed, they need to understand or local levels. Thank you for bringing
and their insight (and that of their staff) clearly what the consequences would be your clout to the conversation.
is limited to their own experiences as if this critical funding were eliminated. •
students. The educational climate has We’re turning our efforts toward asking Melinda George (melinda.george@
changed since they, and likely even Congress to increase overall spending learningforward.org) is Learning
since their children have been in school. caps so that enough money is available Forward's director of policy and
Your voice, impact data, and stories can within the budget to support Title IIA partnerships. ■
help them appreciate what is actually going into the future.
Janice Bradley
L
ooking back over my past year as system moving toward impact on raising
a board member for the Learning student performance through highly
Forward Foundation, I realize that I ABOUT THE LEARNING effective professional learning for adults.
FORWARD FOUNDATION
am more than a member of a foundation,
2
I am part of a learning culture. The foundation offers grants and The foundation cultivates continual
scholarships to support learning
When I joined the foundation, I commitment to improvement and
leaders. Just as important,
thought that I would be a member foundation board members reflection. When the foundation meets
of a traditional funding organization, accompany that financial support twice yearly for two-day retreats and
a non-profit that raised money and with coaching, assisting grantees monthly for committee work, we engage
awarded grants and scholarships for with setting clear goals and in essential management and business
ensuring their work has an impact
educators interested in professional tasks and we also learn together.
on the educators and students
learning. We would help educators they serve. I’m always reading articles, sharing
through fundraising and by providing conversations with thought leaders,
Contribute to the foundation
resources to advance their learning. We throughout the year at www. participating in shared conversations
would meet as an organization yearly to learningforward.org/foundation. through touchpoint conversations with
manage work, ensure financial viability, Read about past grantees and awardees, and engaging in structured
and feel positive about our contributions preview the scholarship and grant conversations during meetings. The
to others. However, I’ve realized that opportunities that will be available foundation intentionally uses a process
early in 2018.
the foundation has transformed from for creating desired results. We have
more than “just a foundation” that a goal in mind, we are committed to
raises and awards money, to a dynamic work together to attain it, and then we
learning culture guided by a vision mission. As part of Learning Forward, think deeply about the results. What
to educate, innovate, and transform the foundation designs intentional happened? What is the evidence? What
professional learning, first advancing our connections to align our vision and needs to change to advance the mission
organizational learning internally, then mission — “Educate, Innovate, and and vision?
supporting learning in collaboration with Transform Professional Learning”
others.
critical to shared work. For example, we message. Through attentive listening, on implementation of their change
collaborate using the “Graduate School we have the ability to analyze the project, we learned in partnership
of Norms” and during each meeting, thoughts and passions of others, which through the awardees’ lived experience
the foundation’s current chair, Audrey strengthens our collaboration for shared how standards are enacted and used to
Hobbs-Johnson, begins and sometimes vision and professional relationships. create impact.
ends each meeting inviting every As a result of participating in the
member to thoughtfully consider which
norm was used to support effective
information transfer during the meeting.
5 The foundation moves from
knowing from research and
knowledge of professional learning, to
foundation as a member of a culture of
learning, not only am I contributing in
collaboration to educating, innovating,
It is clear that each foundation member living the experience with others. After and transforming professional learning
has an important role in contributing to awarding grants and scholarships to for other educators and students, I have
leading change within the foundation. educators, our task turns to supporting made my own transformation as a leader
awardees on their journeys using the of professional learning, and am looking
CHALLENGE
ASSUMPTIONS
M ary Kennedy
challenges some
basic assumptions about
professional learning
research, including its
design and its focus on
the common features of
professional learning such
PERSONALIZED as collective participation,
LEARNING IN content focus,
PUBLIC SCHOOLS intensity of duration,
p. 22 and learning designs
such as professional
learning communities
and coaching. Further,
she questions previous
computational approaches
that fail to consider
variance in the studies and
that minimize the ability
to compare studies.
— Study offers
keen insights
into professional
development
research
p. 16
Joellen Killion
A
conduct research on professional new approach to analyzing questions.
development yields new insights to professional development • How do different professional
inform practice. research provides both development programs
researchers and education practitioners influence teacher learning?
useful information to guide their • What problems of practice
uTHE STUDY practice. do professional development
Kennedy, M. (2016). How does programs aim to address?
professional development improve STUDY DESCRIPTION • What pedagogical approaches
teaching? Review of Educational Mary Kennedy conducts a review do professional development
Research, 86(4), 945-980. and analysis of the research on programs use to facilitate
professional development in K-12 enactment or application of the
U.S. schools in the core content areas content?
published since 1975. • What insights does a new
Acknowledging that past reviews approach to computing
of professional development research and displaying effect size of
based on its core features have professional development
insufficiently considered the variance studies between 1975 and
in research designs and professional 2014 that mitigates variances
development content and design, in studies of differing sample
• Kennedy approaches the review with sizes, research designs,
Joellen Killion (joellen.killion@ different theories of action about how statistical analyses, and units of
learningforward.org) is senior professional development influences analysis offer researchers and
advisor to Learning Forward. teacher learning and enactment of practitioners?
In each issue of The Learning learning in practice.
Professional, Killion explores The analysis yields a graphical METHODOLOGY
a recent research study to help as well as a statistical representation Kennedy conducted a search for
practitioners understand the of effects that allows for alternative experimental studies of professional
impact of particular professional comparison of studies across contexts development in core academic content
learning practices on student and for various types of interpretation. areas (literacy, math, sciences, and
outcomes. Kennedy’s review sorts programs based social studies) within K-12 U.S
on their theories of action. The theories schools between 1975 and 2014. She
of action include the core problems of established the review criteria as studies:
practice the professional development 1. Of professional development
addresses and the pedagogical only and excluded those with
approaches to teacher learning that concomitant supports, such as
supports and leads to enactment of curriculum or technology;
learning. 2. Conducted in the U.S.
only to accommodate the 6. That follow teachers over time, portraying the content to students
unique context of education, rather than students. so that they can learn it; managing
namely the lack of a national The search yielded 28 studies to student behavior; enlisting student
curriculum; include in the analysis. Kennedy then participation; and exposing students’
3. With evidence of student designed a method for computing thinking to assess learning.
achievement either on an estimate of program effects that The second criterion for sorting
distal measures of student accounted for sample size, unit of professional development programs was
achievement such as analysis, research design, and the study’s the program’s approach to facilitating
standardized assessments statistical procedures to minimize enactment — that is, the strategy the
or state tests, coded as M1 variance in effect sizes across studies. program employed to assist teachers in
outcomes, or proximal applying the ideas within their practice.
program-specific assessments of ANALYSIS Kennedy identified four approaches to
student achievement, coded as Kennedy sorted the professional enactment:
M2 outcomes; development programs included in 1. Prescription, which “explicitly
4. With controls for teacher the 28 studies based on two aspects of describe or demonstrate … the
motivation to learn, namely their theories of action, the program’s best way for teachers to address
voluntary participation versus content and its approach to enacting particular teaching problem” (p.
mandatory participation; the learning. The four content strands 955) and with the expectation
5. With a minimum duration of relate to the common problems of that teachers would follow
one year; and practice that challenge teachers: the specific way with limited
uWHAT THIS MEANS FOR PRACTITIONERS time when teachers face multiple competing demands. She
states, “We need to ensure that PD promotes real learning
flexibility or personal judgment; and and treatment groups for each study.
2. Strategies, which is defining 4. Body of knowledge, which is When assignment to groups was not
goals teachers seek to achieve developing “knowledge that comparable, such as mandatory for
and providing “a collection of is organized into a coherent both treatment and control groups
illustrative practices that will body of interrelated concepts or voluntary for both, she excluded
achieve the goals” (p. 955); and principles and that can be the studies to ensure commonality in
3. Insights, which is “raising summarized in books, diagrams, teacher motivation to learn.
provocative questions that force and lectures” and that gives Kennedy organizes the 28 studies
teachers to re-examine familiar teachers “maximum discretion that meet the established criteria by
events and come to see them regarding whether and how the four common challenges teachers
differently” so that teachers are teachers would do anything face. Fifteen studies address portraying
making sound decisions and with that knowledge” (p. 956). content; two address student behavior;
using professional judgment in Kennedy also considered how five address enlisting participation;
classroom situations (p. 955); teachers were assigned to control and six address exposing student
following of the teachers’ enactment of the learning and resentment to the professional learning program. Kennedy
student achievement. reminds readers that attendance may be mandatory, yet
Measuring enactment and student achievement over learning is not. Future revisions of the standards might need
time provides evidence that teacher learning is incremental to address learner motivation more explicitly.
and occurs over time. Learning Forward’s Implementation Provider expertise and experience. Kennedy notes
standard calls for sustained, differentiated, classroom-based that studies with higher effect sizes are those whose
support over time to ensure enactment of learning. It also providers have extensive practical experience and have
calls for ongoing, constructive feedback. Constructive expertise and experience in teacher learning, content, and
feedback aligns with the strategies and insights approach pedagogy related to enacting learning. Providers’ readiness,
to enactment of learning. For more information, see The qualifications, and depth of expertise and experience
Feedback Process: Transforming Feedback for Professional influence the results of professional learning. Provider
Learning (Learning Forward, 2015). qualifications is another consideration for future revision of
Data. The study calls for measuring enactment and the standards.
student achievement over time. Learning Forward’s Data Kennedy challenges some rudimentary assumptions
standard calls for both formative and summative evaluation long held in the field of professional learning and calls
of professional learning using multiple forms and sources of for actions that will both improve practice and the
data. This study suggests that the evaluation of professional usefulness of research. “We need to replace our current
learning occur over multiple years, a possible consideration conception of ‘good’ PD as comprising a collection of
for future revision of the standards for professional learning. particular design features with a conception that is based
Other insights for practitioners include: on more nuanced understanding of what teachers do,
Motivation to learn. A prerequisite for professional what motivates them, and how they learn and grow. We
learning, according to Learning Forward (2011), is “each also need to reconceptualize teachers as people with
educator involved in professional learning comes to the their own motivations and interests” (p. 974). As such,
experience ready to learn” (p. 15). Comparing professional teachers deserve professional learning approaches that are
learning programs based on voluntary or mandatory intellectually rigorous about content meaningful to them
assignment to treatment and control yields insights about rather than prescriptions and bodies of knowledge.
the potential for negative effects not because of the quality
of the learning experience, but rather because of learners’ REFERENCE
motivation to learn. Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for Professional
This study calls on practitioners to examine and address Learning. Oxford, OH: Author.
learners’ motivation to learn for positive results and to
reduce negative emotional effects that cause resistance or
thinking. She extends the summary by 15 studies focused on the challenge of and across content and approaches to
adding the approach to enacting the portraying curriculum content. enact learning.
learning. Eight of the 28 studies use the They are clustered together In the second display, Kennedy
prescription approach; 10 use strategies; along the x-axis by their approach uses the same size, shape, and color to
seven use insights; and three use body to enactment of learning, moving denote the programs’ descriptions to
of knowledge. from prescription that limits teacher display the programs addressing each
Kennedy displays the effects of each decision-making and judgment about of the four challenge areas clustered
study in two graphical displays. In the enactment of learning to body of together along the x-axis and their effect
first, using size, shapes, and color to knowledge that provides the greatest size on the y-axis.
denote descriptors of the studies such amount of teacher choice to enact
as its effects over time, sample size, type learning. Along the y-axis is the RESULTS
of outcome measure, unit of analysis, computed effect size. The graphical Kennedy’s computation and graphic
and post-professional development display, as Kennedy notes, makes it display provide information about the
follow-up, she displays the effects of the possible to compare programs within programs that allows for comparison,
Question
the
ESBD Author
.3
2 yrs
School Research Oregon
Math Study MSP
Coaches Group
.2
Mississippi LETRS
Competencies Question Institute
the Rational
.1 Author Numbers
LETRS
coaching Y1 Y2
Direct add-on
Instruction Linking
Feedback Y1
Y1+ Y1
Comprehensive
Induction Y2
Science
Immersion
and student achievement was followed. Mary Kennedy motivation to learn as significant
If coaching is included, coaching that factors in the success of professional
emphasizes strategy and insights tends emphasizes that development. She also notes that how
to be more successful than prescription- programs that coaching, a relatively common feature
oriented coaching. acknowledge the in professional learning today, supports
Kennedy notes that teacher practice, enactment influences the effect size.
as previous research confirms, increases
incremental growth of She calls on researchers to examine
incrementally over time. The display also teachers and include more closely professional development
confirms that M2 outcome measures, a follow-up measure providers’ content and pedagogical
those more closely aligned to program knowledge and their approach to
content and goals, have greater effect
have larger effect enacting learning. She notes that more
sizes than those that use more general sizes. effective programs included in the 28
measures of student achievement. studies had providers with established
Kennedy summarizes the first need to improve their practice or learn histories of working with teachers,
display by noting that prescription as an something new, may be at play in direct experience in the classroom, and
approach to enactment has the lowest instances where effect size is larger and expertise with the content and teacher
effect, with body of knowledge next, where there is follow-up with teachers. learning.
insight next, and strategy the highest She specifically points to programs She emphasizes that programs that
for the studies addressing the challenge that had a negative effect, and posits acknowledge the incremental growth
of portraying content. that such a negative emotional response of teachers and include a follow-up
Studies with mandatory assignment may be resistance to the program’s measure have larger effect sizes.
have lower effect sizes as do larger- demands. Programs in the areas of
scale studies than other studies. The enlisting participation and exposing LIMITATIONS
overall effect size is .10 for these 15 student thinking tended to be more Kennedy introduces a new way
studies and, when the studies that used strategy- and insight-based and have to analyze the effects of professional
mandatory assignment are removed, the larger effect sizes, especially in their development research that challenges
effect size rises to .16. second year, than other programs. the What Works Clearinghouse
The studies in this cluster are all In concluding about the second standards for research design and
below .2, and Kennedy notes that display, Kennedy notes that programs demonstrates that research in
higher effect sizes in other reviews are in any of the four challenge areas are professional development that follows
likely distorted by the variance in the likely to improve student achievement, the recommended high-level evidence
sample size, research design, statistical suggesting that no one area is more standards are less effective than studies
analysis, and professional development important than another. All contribute that are smaller scale and use voluntary
content and approach. to improved practice and student assignment. As she notes, other factors
The second display includes all the success. not examined in the traditional
programs clustered by the challenges Kennedy explains how the approach professional development research, such
their content addresses. Using the she used for analysis of the effect size as motivation to learn and provider
same symbols to depict each program, of the 28 studies differs from the more attributes, may influence results.
clustered along the x-axis by their traditional analysis of professional Kennedy does not include the
challenge area and excluding those development studies using the specific effect size for each study based
programs with mandatory assignment common features of intensity, collective on her computation. The effect size
in the portraying content section, participation, content knowledge, and is portrayed in the graphical display,
Kennedy makes it easy to compare coaching. yet including the specific number in
programs based on participant She challenges basic assumptions in the table would be a helpful reference
assignment to treatment group. each area with studies she included and for readers. Overall, the computation
The differences in effect size calls upon researchers to go beyond the of effect size produces small numbers
introduce the possibility, Kennedy surface features to examine more closely for each study, which may lead some
suggests, that social motivation, in the specific content of and approach to question the value of professional
which the participants desire to support to enactment using the theories of development in general based on the
the researcher rather than perceive a action she articulates and teacher small effect sizes. ■
REFLECTING ON PRACTICE
Theron Blakeslee,
left, and Lauri
Bach, an 8th-grade
U.S. history teacher
in Kingsley,
Michigan, review
the video of her
teaching.
ACCENTUATE
MICHIGAN
TEACHERS
USE RUBRICS
FORMATIVE
AND VIDEO TO
IMPROVE THEIR
THE PRACTICE
F
UNDERSTANDING
• Activating prior knowledge
ormative assessment is one rubrics to provide actionable feedback • Eliciting evidence of student
of the most effective tools to each other. understanding
that teachers use to promote • Teacher questioning strategies
student learning, and Lauri Bach, • Rationale for questioning
watching yourself teach on 8TH-GRADE U.S. HISTORY 4. FORMATIVE FEEDBACK
video is one of the most effective ways Lauri Bach teaches 8th-grade U.S. • Feedback from the teacher
to improve your teaching. As part of a history at Kingsley Middle School in • Feedback from peers
project for the Michigan Department Kingsley, Michigan. For the last three • Student self-assessment
of Education, we worked with eight years, she has been a member of a 5. INSTRUCTIONAL AND LEARNING
teachers in Michigan who are using school-based learning team studying DECISIONS
videos of their teaching to improve their formative assessment practices with her
• Adjustments to teaching
• Adjustments to learning
use of formative assessment practices. colleagues.
In this article, we describe one of All teachers in her school are
the rubrics we used and highlight some members of a learning team, where
of the improvements that the teachers teachers read, discuss, and sharpen their districts throughout Michigan. FAME
in our project discovered for themselves ideas about implementing formative provides support and resources through
through this process. We also discuss assessment. regional coordinators, with the express
how the learning teams we worked with The Formative Assessment for purpose of studying and implementing
are moving toward facilitating their Michigan Educators (FAME) project of formative assessment practices.
own enhanced professional learning the Michigan Department of Education Bach’s learning team has been
using classroom observations and the works with teams like this in about 160 meeting for three years. While teams
like this are a supportive place to she wanted to change. Would these of self-evaluation, “How well do you
discuss new teaching practices, they improvements have occurred to her think you’re prepared for the test on
may not be set up to provide an without actually watching herself teach? Monday? Do you think there are some
essential component of improvement: How reflective can we be about our areas for you to work on? If so, come in
descriptive, actionable feedback to each own teaching when we’re in the middle for extra help during seventh hour.”
other about actual classroom practice. of it, guiding students through the class These self-assessments aren’t the
So when we suggested to Bach and period? only piece of formative feedback.
seven other teachers that we would like Bach provides descriptive, actionable
to observe in their classrooms, video OBSERVING TEACHING feedback during class and on written
their teaching, and then use rubrics to The classes we observed were very assignments, and the students are
analyze and reflect on their teaching, active and highly engaging for Bach’s learning to evaluate each other’s work
they saw this as an opportunity for students. Woven throughout her lessons and give peer feedback.
formative assessment on their own use were formative assessment strategies For example, in one class, students
of formative assessment. that helped her make instructional were paired to listen to each other’s
Bach allowed us to sit in the back decisions and encouraged students to warm-ups and offer suggestions for
of her classroom with a video camera take ownership of their learning. making each other’s work more specific.
and record one of her classes for five In one lesson we observed, students The task wasn’t particularly successful on
days. Then she joined us later each took on the roles of several Founding the day we observed, but Bach’s reaction
day to watch portions of the video, Fathers to re-enact the events leading was to give students her own feedback
talk about her teaching, and use a set up to the Supreme Court decision on the process and let them know they
of rubrics to determine her level of of Marbury v. Madison, establishing would continue to practice this.
practice of formative assessment on five the concept of judicial review. Their When we came back to observe a
dimensions (see box on p. 25). learning targets were about developing month later, students were asked again
Bach is a strong teacher, and, not an awareness of landmark cases and, to give feedback to their peers. This
coincidentally, a strong learner. Even in particular, an understanding of time they used a rubric to evaluate their
though she said she was nervous with how the judicial branch of the federal partner’s diary entries — a summative
the video camera in the back of the government subsequently gained greater activity to show what they had learned
room, the first thing she wanted to power. The final production at the end about the Industrial Revolution by
know when we came together after her of class was short but informative, and creating a fictitious diary entry of a
class was, “What can I do better?” students were enthusiastic about the young person from that time period
As researchers, we were not there work. about the issues they faced working in
to tell her what to do better. Our The formative assessment strategy the factories.
approach was to facilitate, asking, at the end of this class was a self- This time, there were many more
“Given what we’ve just seen of your evaluation of learning from this role- instances of students who gave and
teaching, where do you place yourself playing activity along with several received actionable feedback, and
on each of these rubrics?” other activities from the past few some could be seen adding to their
As our discussion progressed and days, using scales — student-centered papers afterwards. This demonstrated
Bach used the rubrics to analyze her generic rubrics based on the learning the effectiveness of the feedback and
teaching, not only did she feel confident targets. Bach’s students self-assess often, practice that Bach gave to the class in
that many things she was doing were tracking their progress over the course the intervening month.
“right,” she also discovered a few things of a unit. Bach will ask, after this kind The last activity for the day,
the exit ticket, engages students in It’s not just discussion, and it’s not just
metacognition about their learning
(i.e. “Tell me some things you did
reflection on the day’s highs and lows. It is
to make your learning go well for an analysis of the day’s work with rubrics
you today”). One of the purposes of
formative assessment is to give students
that describe the practices we aim for.
ways to take more ownership of their things better,” it wasn’t a surprise to see formative assessment rubrics becomes
learning, and being metacognitive is her trying level 4 questions the next day very useful, focusing on the connection
an important step. We want students in class. When the opportunity arose, between practice, as recorded from the
to adjust their learning strategies in she asked several students, “How did day’s lesson, and theory, as embodied in
response to teacher and peer feedback as you come up with that answer?” They the rubrics.
well as their own self-reflection. seemed to enjoy talking more about What makes this approach to
The other purpose of formative their ideas. professional learning potentially
assessment is for teachers to adjust powerful is this connection between
instruction based on evidence of CONDITIONS FOR SUCCESSFUL theory and practice. It’s not just
student understanding. Bach collects LEARNING TEAMS discussion, and it’s not just reflection
exit tickets and warm-ups to check Learning teams like Bach’s need to on the day’s highs and lows. It is an
every student’s progress on almost a be structured, planned, and facilitated analysis of the day’s work with rubrics
daily basis. to meet three conditions necessary that describe the practices we aim for.
On one occasion, she gave as for effective adult learning: 1) having
a warm-up: “Tell me one specific a single purpose; 2) using a coach FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT
thing you learned yesterday about the who asks probing questions; and 3) RUBRICS
Industrial Revolution.” She makes making connections between theory The rubrics that teachers in our
decisions about the pace of the class and and practice (Kintz, Lane, Gotwals, & study have been using were developed
the necessity for review based on this Cisterna, 2015). over several years by two research teams,
evidence collected from students. Michigan’s FAME learning teams one with members from Michigan
satisfy the first condition by focusing State University and one sponsored by
TEACHER QUESTIONING on formative assessment. They strive to the Michigan Assessment Consortium,
STRATEGIES maintain that focus in each meeting, a nonprofit coordinating body
Bach set the tone for our first knowing that it can be tempting to go promoting effective assessment practices
afternoon session when she entered the off agenda to discuss other school issues. throughout the state.
room asking, “What can I do better?” All FAME learning teams have The rubrics are based on five
As we went through the class activities coaches, and many are trained essential dimensions of formative
on video and coded each instance in Cognitive Coaching (Costa assessment, each described by one or
of her use of formative assessment & Garmston, 2016) so that they more subdimensions, as shown in the
with an appropriate description from know how to listen and ask probing box on p. 25.
the rubrics, she constantly had self- questions, satisfying the second The rubrics do much of the work of
improvement as her frame of mind. condition. guiding discussion with teachers as they
On the first day, she focused on The third condition may be the reflect on their daily practice. However,
the rubric about teacher questioning most difficult to achieve. By design, we served as knowledgeable colleagues
strategies (see table on p. 26). learning teams are places to gather, who asked questions that may have
The idea behind this rubric is read, and discuss. Connections between moved their reflection forward.
that some types of questions might theory and practice may be addressed Reviewing one’s teaching and
provide more insight into a student’s if teachers bring specific classroom analyzing it using rubrics might work
understanding than others, thus giving instances to the group and jointly try fine for many teachers if they do this
teachers valuable information for to solve the problem of how formative work alone. But analysis is enhanced
making instructional decisions. assessment can be applied. Still, this is when they do this with a colleague who
Bach noticed that she often asked just conversation, not exactly practice. can ask simple questions such as, “How
questions at level 2 or 3, but rarely This is where recording one’s could you have done that differently?”
at level 4. Given her focus on “doing teaching and analyzing it using or “What does that rubric statement
■ Principal leadership
■ School improvement
■ System improvement
■ Standards alignment
■ Comprehensive planning
■ Customized services
LEADING
THE WAY
IN LITERACY
CLASSROOM VISITS OFFER A COMPREHENSIVE VIEW OF TEACHING AND LEARNING
S
chools and districts or how districts can build literacy them to evaluate individual teaching
are required to have leadership capacity. performance.
improvement plans that Leaders need a system to collect and
specify instructional and analyze timely and useful information A BETTER WAY
curricular ideas to enhance about current instructional practices Many districts need clear
teachers’ ongoing practice and assist in their schools and how students classroom data focused on the literacy
students in performing at higher levels. engage and collaborate in the process culture and instructional practices
Yet little has been done to examine the of learning. These data must be being implemented in each school.
specific knowledge that principals need collected consistently for instructional Understanding these elements is crucial
regarding literacy teaching and learning growth and without the intent of using for success, and this is where the
FOR DISCOVERY
BY ANDREW MILLER
P
roject-based learning is a achievement data on tests such as Students are more engaged in
successful way to engage Advanced Placement (Edutopia, 2013) learning as they grasp with problems,
students in learning in as well as increased critical thinking challenges, and questions to investigate
the classroom. Research and problem-solving skills (Beckett & in an authentic context (Thomas,
reports increases in student Miller, 2006). 2000). In addition, teachers report
Grade
Working
rap Conditio
Mouse T
3
SOCIAL S
TUDIES ns
Grade
RACY
SCIE NCE LITE
STUDENT PRODUCTS
8
• Participate in a table team measuring activity
Beanz Meanz Mathz
Grade
increased satisfaction in their practice professional development? “projects,” we might conjure up images
when they use project-based learning Project-based learning provides of creating a volcano for a science fair
(Hixson, Ravitz, & Whisman, 2012). a framework for transforming or dressing up for a ’70s fair in social
This last finding is striking when professional learning with innovative studies class. These are what many of us
we consider the potentials for applying instruction and can be a model for working in project-based learning refer
project-based learning to professional designing job-embedded professional to as “dessert” projects.
development. If both students and development for all teachers. Traditionally, projects are often
teachers are more engaged when they used as a culminating experience
use project-based learning, why aren’t WHAT IS PROJECT-BASED after the majority of teaching and
we using the elements of project- LEARNING? learning has occurred. We might
based learning to engage teachers in When many of us think of the word teach important content and skills on
1. What are the goals and outcomes teachers need voice and choice 6. How will the project be inquiry-
for the project? Teachers should throughout. This might take the based and sustained over time?
be engaged in learning about form of teams investigating similar Instead of just a one-time work, the
professional practice. These problems of practice, choice in what project must be a sustained inquiry
could be goals related to specific products they will produce or share, process. There must be an effective
instructional strategies, student or even when they choose to do launch and driving question for
achievement data, or even specific components of the project. the project to focus the work.
collaborative and school culture The launch could be a video, a
4. How will teachers be assessed?
goals. provocative article, or an engaging
The project should include specific
workshop to start the process.
2. How will the project be products or deliverables, including
In addition, there needs to be a
meaningful, authentic, and authentic work units, discovery
focus on deeper learning through
challenging? The professional cards, or presentations. There
questioning.
learning project should be should be formative assessments
connected to the classroom, and that might include feedback 7. What variety of strategies and
teachers need to see it as directly sessions, protocols, or even structures will be embedded in
applicable to their daily work. The ongoing reflection journals. the project? Project-based learning
project should also be a challenge leverages a variety of instructional
5. How will teachers share their work
and push teachers outside of their strategies. An effective professional
and learning? A public component
comfort zone in appropriate ways. learning project should include
is critical to any project. It helps
protocols, workshops, classrooms
3. How will teachers have voice build accountability and culture.
visits, and other effective adult
and choice? While there may be Teachers should share their work
learning strategies.
specific goals for all teachers in with each other and perhaps with
the professional learning project, an even larger audience.
argumentative writing and then have might learn and how they will show in Shanghai, China, we have taken
students choose a project to show what that learning and share it with a public these components of effective project-
they know. Engaging, yes; but not quite audience (Larmer & Mergendoller, based learning and applied them to
true project-based learning. 2010b). professional development.
Instead of waiting for the project, Direct instruction might occur, but
project-based learning makes the it comes from the meaningful inquiry SHANGHAI AMERICAN SCHOOL
project the main course of learning, not of the project. The project is also Shanghai American School is
simply the dessert at the end (Larmer & centered around a meaningful driving China’s largest international school
Mergendoller, 2010a). As the project is question, such as, “Is our water safe to with students from over 40 countries
engaging and meaningful, learners learn drink?” or “How can we reduce poverty in grades pre-K to 12. Teachers come
and apply in a cycle of inquiry. Learners in our community?” from more than 27 countries, having
are given voice and choice in what they At Shanghai American School experience both teaching in the United
taking a deficit approach. Reflection was ongoing were cultural outcomes that positively
The professional learning project and critical to the impacted student learning.
itself was a collection of effective
project’s success.
adult learning strategies and learning REFERENCES
designs. Teachers engaged in project- build clarity for learning outcomes Beckett, G.H. & Miller, P.C.
based learning. We used protocols and activities in our schools. The (2006). Project-based second and foreign
for professional practice to allow for discovery cards themselves were a clear language education: Past, present, and
equitable and structured conversations and transparent deliverable of student future. Charlotte, NC: Information
connected to student learning. Teachers learning, but there were other powerful Age.
developed their own goals and selected outcomes as well. Edutopia. (2013). Knowledge in
their own problems of practice to We collected comments from our action research: Results to date. Available
address. celebration and sharing of our learning at www.edutopia.org/knowledge-in-
Reflection was ongoing and critical anthology and discovery cards. One action-PBL-research-results.
to the project’s success, and tools and of the comments addressed the power Garmston, R. & Wellman,
norms increased teachers’ reflective lens. of learning what teachers are doing B. (2016). The adaptive school: A
The learning occurred in whole-group with students in their classrooms. “I’m sourcebook for developing collaborative
staff meetings, smaller team meetings, already seeing curricular connections to groups (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD:
and through informal visits and other colleagues I hadn’t seen before,” Rowman & Littlefield.
conversations. Teachers were engaged one teacher said. “I’m looking forward Hixson, N.K., Ravitz, J., &
from the voice and choice they had to integrating my curriculum.” Whisman, A. (2012). Extended
in their curation and through the fact Another teacher said, “It was great professional development in project-
that the work was directly related to to have a summarized snapshot of the based learning: Impacts on 21st century
classroom practice and student learning. learning experiences that students are skills teaching and student achievement.
Finally, the professional learning having, and it will help us to upgrade Charleston, WV: West Virginia
was effective and sustainable because we our curriculum next year.” Teachers Department of Education.
used existing resources. Instructional gained better clarity of what students Larmer, J. & Mergendoller, J.
coaches took the lead in designing were learning in their classrooms as (2010a). The main course, not dessert.
and implementing the professional well as other classrooms. This data also Available at www.bie.org/object/
learning project. The project itself was helped teachers set goals for the next document/main_course_not_dessert.
job-embedded and not a one-time visit year, when they will continue to engage Larmer, J. & Mergendoller, J.
from a coach, but an extended inquiry in the process of aligning curriculum (2010b). Seven essentials for project-
in teaching and learning with multiple and assessments to standards to based learning. Educational Leadership,
touch points and assessments. improve student learning outcomes. 68(1), 34-37.
Professional learning included In addition to curricular outcomes, Learning Forward. (2011).
whole-staff meetings as well as we noticed our teams are more willing Standards for Professional Learning.
designated days on the school calendar. to collaborate. Teachers regularly meet Oxford, OH: Author.
Overall, the project-based learning and protect that collaborative time to Miller, A. (2017). Deeper learning
professional learning experience drew focus on student learning. Teachers – for teachers. Available at www.
on best practices for adult learning and want to learn from each other and, in edutopia.org/article/deeper-learning-
effective professional learning for all the future, will engage in learning walks for-teachers-andrew-miller.
teachers. to continue to support this learning and Thomas, J.W. (2000). A review
collaboration. of research on project-based learning.
OVERALL IMPACT In addition, coaches saw more Available at www.bobpearlman.org/
Our overall goals were to build teachers coming to the office to ask BestPractices/PBL_Research.pdf.
a collaborative culture and start a for support. Some teachers who never •
dialogue around a guaranteed and visited before came for the first time Andrew Miller (andrew@
viable curriculum through discovering the whole year after completion of andrewkmiller.com) is an
what is occurring in the classroom. the project to have discussions and instructional coach at the Shanghai
We wanted colleagues to learn more dialogues. Not only were there more American School in Shanghai,
about each other, and we wanted to direct curricular outcomes, but there China. ■
REPLAY,
REFLECT,
REFINE
VIDEO-BASED COACHING ACCELERATES TEACHER GROWTH
T
he cognitive load that discovered that a teacher makes 800 analyze and evaluate for effectiveness?
a teacher experiences to 1,500 educational decisions every Jim Knight discusses “the busyness
is mind-numbing. To day (p. 55). How is it possible for a of teaching” — and, he adds, “all while
improve, a teacher must teacher to remember mental notes and keeping an eye on the clock” (Knight,
begin by reflecting on his decide which decisions are having the 2014, p. 6). The answer in the St.
or her work, but with the mountain biggest impact on student achievement, Vrain Valley School District, 30 miles
of decisions, where does a teacher find and which ones are impeding student northwest of Denver, Colorado, and
time or have the capacity to notice the learning? How does a teacher attend to educational home to more than 32,000
way in which students are interacting student needs? How does an individual students, is the use of video. We have
with lessons? shift instruction based on these needs, learned that video helps teachers reflect
Kauchak & Eggen (2005) and how can data be collected to on the impact of their decisions by
freeing them of the burden of teaching VIDEO AS ACCELERATOR: after the observation, teacher and coach
and reflecting simultaneously. Teachers seeing their practice reflect on what the data reveal about the
In 2014, the St. Vrain Valley through their own eyes impact of the teacher’s decisions, and
School District Office of Professional The traditional coaching cycle set new goals.
Development began using video for begins with the teacher and coach One challenge the traditional
professional learning. We purchased meeting to plan an observation. coaching cycle presents is that the data
licenses for a video platform that allows Teacher and coach identify goals collection and reflection are driven
teachers, coaches, and administrators and what to look for during the by the coach’s memory. A teacher has
to upload video and pause at specific lesson: What are students saying? trouble remembering details of the lesson
points to add comments, questions, What are students doing in response due to focusing on teaching rather than
and notes. Here’s what we have learned to a question? How well are they reflecting. At this point, the coach’s job
about how to use video effectively and transitioning? is to help the teacher recall these details
efficiently to accelerate the growth of During the observation, the coach in a way that helps her process, reflect,
the teachers in our district. collects data based on the goal. Shortly and set goals to improve.
With new content ranging from the strategic to the specific, this practical Joellen Killion and Cindy Harrison
resource guides school-based coaches and leaders in the practice of student-
focused coaching. System leaders may use Taking the Lead as they advocate
the design of a coaching program focused on team, school, and district
learning goals. School-based coaches and teacher leaders will find advice for Item No. B606, 244 pages
coaching a reluctant colleague, drawing up an effective working agreement, Members $36, Nonmembers $45
reflecting on their own practice, or troubleshooting a challenge.
2305 Trust
WHAT Strong
teacher-student
TO DO
relationships
ABOUT
JIM?
Weak
problem-
solving skills
H
Loyal
Great staff
member
money, he’s committed to the students, knowledge within his content area
teachers, and the principal of his school, are limited. When it comes time
Sharon. for problem solving and analysis
The truth is, though, Jim lacks of complex issues, Jim falls short.
some of the specific skills needed in the However, the job requires both kinds of
classroom to support student learning. skills — the soft and the hard skills are
He’ll certainly be nominated as the equally important.
teacher of year as he has year after year Jim’s PLC is focused on using
at his school, but mostly by peers who evidenced-based strategies to close the
haven’t seen him teach or haven’t really 9th-grade achievement gap in math,
dug into his student learning outcomes. and Jim’s classes are performing the
As principal, Sharon knows he can lowest within the department. Sharon
Well-liked grow and develop as a teacher, but she is convinced that Jim’s moderate
is hesitant to have a direct conversation outcomes are due to his strong
with him, even though it could improve teacher-student relationship and not
his performance. Why? Although Jim is his pedagogical skills, which she cares
mediocre in the classroom, he is a great so much to improve, but shudders to
staff member and well-liked by all, and think about what she might say and
Sharon’s afraid of the ripple effect it how she might say it.
might cause in staff morale. Even though the evidence to
A tough conversation that mentions intervene with Jim is there, Sharon
the need to improve or even the remains hesitant. She’s left to balance
threat of potentially putting Jim on the culture of the organization
Shallow a performance plan could crush his with Jim’s (and others’) need for
content-area morale. Furthermore, if Jim decided to improvement. Despite the possible
skills share what was happening with other drawbacks, Sharon decides to take
teachers, the result of his being put on the first step with Jim — having
a plan, coupled with Jim’s popularity, a conversation and laying out the
could have a negative impact on the strengths and weaknesses of Jim’s
school community as a whole. performance and how she believes
This leaves Sharon at a crossroads. they can work together to improve his
As Sharon listens to Jim’s professional ability.
learning community (PLC) at work, she Sharon believes in transparency
is perplexed on how to move forward, and has pushed professional dialogue
yet she’s confident on what needs to be among her teachers. Now she decides
addressed. to exercise her own practices with her
The problem is Jim’s hard skills. staff. She likes Jim and knows that if he
His technical prowess and depth of accepts her feedback, he can improve.
N ew leaders don’t know what they don’t know. As leaders move from
their preparation program focused on acquiring knowledge, skills,
and attitudes of effective leaders, they often feel as if their learning
begins anew when they accept their first administrative position. The
continued opportunity for professional learning on the job is essential.
A viable and structured mentoring and induction program lessens
the need for new principals to feel as if they are self-taught with gaps
in skills and a lack of understanding of key responsibilities. The impact
of making decisions daily, needing to respect local traditions and
values, and embracing opportunities for necessary change can present
daunting challenges for any new school leader.
I am mentor, I am coach, p. 52
I AM MENTOR, EFFECTIVE
MENTORS HELP
I AM COACH
NEW LEADERS
DEVELOP THEIR
OWN STRENGTHS
M
uch has been written Louis, Leithwood, Wahlstrom, and schools forward.
about the challenge of Anderson (2010) say that leadership is That said, preparing good leaders
preparing good leaders important because it sets conditions and depends not only on providing good
within our schools. expectations in the school for excellent initial professional learning, but also
Smith and Smith instruction and a culture of ongoing on creating a strong support structure
(2015) note that effective leadership learning for educators and students. during the early years of practice.
practices have a strong, measurable Fullan (2010) asserts that the However, what good mentoring looks
effect on student achievement, teaching impact of leadership can become the and sounds like varies widely in practice.
quality, and schools. single most important factor in moving Many mentoring programs for
A COHERENT
SYSTEM CONNECTS
LOOSE ENDS
TOOLS
FOR
CREATING
COHERENCE
p. 58
October
October
2017 2017
| Vol.
| 38
Vol.
No.385No. 5 www.learningforward.org | The
www.learningforward.org | Learning
The Learning
Professional
Professional 57 57
TOOL Blackline masters for your convenience
TYING IT ALL
TOGETHER
Becoming a Learning Team: A Guide to a Teacher-Led Cycle of Continuous Improvement
by Stephanie Hirsh and Tracy Crow
T
he learning team cycle as perspectives, coherent initiatives are Coherence puts all educators on
described in Becoming a neither redundant nor contradictory. the same systemwide map, so to speak.
Learning Team by Stephanie At the same time, to be coherent, Every teacher, every principal, knows
Hirsh and Tracy Crow was all professional learning aligns with where he or she is headed, who will
created to support teams of teachers teacher, school, and system priorities. travel with them, and who is driving
working on particular lessons and Such priorities are expressed in either the bus. They see options for getting
instructional challenges within the systemwide vision for teaching and where they are headed and they have
classrooms. Even as the day-to-day learning or an instructional framework the knowledge and skills to pick the
work of classroom teaching continues, for a school, or preferably, both. most effective route. In outlining the
educators are also responsible for When teachers work in a coherent importance of coherence, the Outcomes
addressing improvement goals at the system, they know their priorities and standard of Learning Forward’s (2011)
school and system levels. What do they know why those are priorities. Standards for Professional Learning
educators need to do to ensure that Coherence ensures that teachers don’t states:
professional learning and support is spend their time with professional Outcomes: Professional
coherent across grade levels, subject learning that makes them wonder, learning that increases educator
areas, school buildings, and school “What does this have to do with me?” effectiveness and results for all
systems? or “How is this going to help me work students aligns its outcomes with
better with my students?” Coherence educator performance and student
WHAT IS COHERENCE? makes it possible for a teacher to curriculum standards. (p. 48)
In a coherent system, all initiatives connect new professional learning with The Outcomes standard
that make a direct impact on teachers other learning he or she experiences, encompasses three interrelated elements
are aligned and reinforce one another’s as well as to align it with the highest that professional learning must address
effectiveness; from the teachers’ priorities of a team, school, and system. to increase likelihood that it is linked
DEFINING ROLES
AND RESPONSIBILITIES
THAT CONTRIBUTE
TO COHERENCE
Purpose To build understanding of what systemwide coherence looks like and educators' roles in
contributing to coherence.
Process 1. Share the reading A TALE OF 2 TEAMS as well as the following table and 10 minutes
list of responsibilities of those in various roles. Ask individuals to read the
short piece, and to highlight or underline the actions educators are taking
that contribute to the outcomes teams experience in each of the two
examples.
3. Turn to the table of roles and responsibilities. Considering the local context, 15 minutes
individually fill in the table with how your system or school operates now.
4. Using the list of suggested actions for those in various roles, consider 25 minutes
what actions or shifts in responsibilities might help to build coherence
to fill in the next two columns of the table. Do this either as a group or in
pairs. Include actions that aren't on the list of suggestions as they occur to
the group.
A TALE OF 2 TEAMS
W
ithout coherence, the impact of specific instances of team-based learning will be limited, no matter how
successful they are on their own.
Meaningful and effective learning at one level must connect with meaningful and effective learning at
another level. For example, let’s say a team of three language arts teachers has set a team goal tied to improving students’
vocabulary use, given the needs they identified through data analysis. After discussion and study, these teachers chose
to learn about and implement a particular instructional strategy in several upcoming lessons. As they read through
subsequent samples of student work, they found that their approach had been successful, and they talked about how to
use their learning to go further during their next unit.
A team of teachers in any setting could experience such success through their collaborative learning. They identified
an adult learning need connected to a student learning need, they found a way to address it that involved building their
own capacity, and they saw an impact on student learning. Why does it matter if the system in which those teachers
worked was a coherent system?
KEY ACTIONS
TEACHERS
Key actions to build and maintain coherence include:
• Communicating within and across teams about highest priority learning needs for both students and adults.
• Sharing individual learning needs with team members to make connections to team learning needs.
• Identifying what learning options would most contribute to critical professional learning needs.
• Explicitly connecting prior learning with future and current learning.
• Communicating team learning challenges and successes across the school and district.
• Advocating with school and district leaders for opportunities to connect with other educators who share
similar challenges.
• Speaking out when there is lack of coherence.
• Protecting practices that align the learning team to those that most align with the individual, school, and
system priorities.
• Avoiding bringing to the team tempting initiatives that have little or nothing to do with the purpose of the
learning team.
PRINCIPALS
Key actions to build coherence include:
• Contributing to a districtwide common vision with the participation of a school leadership team that includes
teachers.
• Facilitating school and team conversations about the common vision to create shared understanding and
common language around teaching and learning.
Continued on p. 64
”
This time with the Academy has been the most valuable professional learning experience of my 28-year
career. To focus on the Standards for Professional Learning, select a problem of practice, and work with
colleagues at all levels of my organization around a common problem has propelled our district forward
in focus and alignment of our professional learning goals to truly impact student achievement.
Joe McFarland, Academy graduate
www.learningforward.org/academy
TOOL Defining rules and responsibilities that contribute to coherence
ROLE HOW DO CURRENT WHAT ACTIONS OR SHIFTS MIGHT WHAT SPECIFIC OUTCOMES
RESPONSIBILITIES HELP CREATE IMPROVE COHERENCE? WOULD BE THE RESULT OF SUCH
COHERENCE? SHIFTS?
Teacher
Instructional
coach
Department
head
School leader
or principal
Central office
leader
A NETWORK
FOR EXCELLENCE
— Carnegie
grant boosts
What Matters
Now Network
to improve
teaching and
learning
p. 68
C In order to work
arnegie Corporation of New more than 40 years of experience in
York has awarded a $600,000 designing and facilitating professional
grant to Learning Forward to toward relevant and learning systems and on its expertise
support the launch of the new What sustainable change, in bringing together learning teams
Matters Now Network, a community and communities of practice to
of state-based coalitions of policy the network will advance critical systems change. The
makers and educators. The network will
apply improvement science methods
focus on practical new network will utilize improvement
science strategies to support continuous
within a Networked Improvement solutions that link learning in the multi-stakeholder
Community to strengthen professional
learning that measurably improves
practice and policy. coalitions, which will focus on
improving key aspects of effective
educator practice and results for professional learning systems such as
students. Learning Forward, a designed to achieve this vision so that practice-based collaboration and aligned
membership association focused on all students have access to effective instructional materials. In order to work
effective professional learning for K-12 teaching and learning. NCTAF and toward relevant and sustainable change,
educators, will facilitate the network, Learning Forward merged earlier this the network will focus on practical
engaging stakeholders from the state year. solutions that link practice and policy.
level to the classroom level in each state “Learning Forward is honored to In the next steps for the initiative,
coalition. have Carnegie Corporation’s support Learning Forward will identify the
The 2016 National Commission in this effort, a continuation of a long- initial three states to participate in the
on Teaching and America’s Future standing commitment to transforming What Matters Now Network. The
(NCTAF) landmark report, What teaching and learning,” said Stephanie states chosen will have demonstrated
Matters Now: A New Compact for Hirsh, executive director of Learning an interest in issues of professional
Teaching and Learning, outlines a Forward. “This network will offer states learning systems as a means to achieve
vision where teachers have more agency and districts powerful opportunities equity and excellence, and will have
and leadership opportunities within a to focus on developing solutions to the political will and capacity for
coherent learning system that aligns substantive problems of practice that implementing substantive change across
resources, provides data to inform will inform and improve policy, along systems.
decision making, and supports teacher- with the support they need to operate as The philanthropic foundation
led collaborative professional learning continuous learning organizations.” supported earlier stages of this work
within continuous improvement cycles. The What Matters Now network through a planning grant.
The What Matters Now Network is will build on Learning Forward’s
T
use Doodle Buddy to his third edition of Joellen
create graphs, add
Killion’s essential resource
audio in SeeSaw, then
upload to SeeSaw digital guides readers through the rigors
portfolios. of producing an effective, in-depth
analysis of professional learning. The
FOCUS a difference. Collecting and using coaching cycle presents is that the
REFLECTING ON PRACTICE Literacy Classroom Visit Model data collection and reflection are
data from every school across driven by the coach’s memory.
Accentuate the formative: a district can provide a richer, Contrast this with a video-based
Michigan teachers use rubrics and more comprehensive view of the coaching cycle. Teacher and
video to improve their practice. status of teaching and learning coach begin the process in the
By Theron Blakeslee, Denny Chandler, districtwide. Districts can use these same way — having a planning
Edward Roeber, and Tara Kintz data to design improvement plans conversation to start the cycle and
Lauri Bach, an 8th-grade and help outline the best strategies set goals as usual — but the shift
U.S. history teacher in Michigan, for reaching district and school happens from this point forward.
is a member of a school-based goals. The observation is done via video,
learning team studying formative meaning that the lesson can be
assessment practices with her Process for discovery: replayed as many times as desired
colleagues. While teams like Project-based learning builds and the lesson is grounded, not by
this are a supportive place to teachers’ collaboration skills. perception and memory, but in
discuss new teaching practices, By Andrew Miller reality so the teacher can see the
they may not be set up to Research shows that project- lesson through her own eyes.
provide an essential component based learning is a successful
of improvement: descriptive, way to engage both students What to do about Jim?
actionable feedback to each other and teachers in the classroom. Professional dialogue turns
about actual classroom practice. If that’s the case, instructional difficult conversations into growth
Researchers from the Formative leaders at the Shanghai American opportunities.
Assessment for Michigan School in China wondered, why By Joseph Jones and T.J. Vari
Educators (FAME) project of aren’t we using the elements Professional dialogue
the Michigan Department of of project-based learning to centered on improving someone’s
Education worked with Bach and engage teachers in professional performance is challenging.
seven other teachers to observe development? The school faced Difficult conversations are
in their classrooms, video their two challenges: the constant too often avoided due to the
teaching, and then use rubrics turnover of teachers and a need unpredictable manner in how
to analyze and reflect on their to create a culture for coaching. the message will be received,
teaching. To address these challenges, the the potential strain on the
school’s instructional coaches relationship, and also the technical
Leading the way in literacy: developed project-based learning clarity necessary to lead the
Classroom visits offer a professional development to build conversation. Establishing and
comprehensive view of teaching a collaborative culture that is systematizing professional dialogue
and learning. aligned with the school’s goal of a in the workplace transforms
By Bonnie Houck and Sandi Novak guaranteed and viable curriculum. the difficulty and complexity of
Many districts need clear such conversations and creates
classroom data focused on the Replay, reflect, refine: manageable, meaningful, and
literacy culture and instructional Video-based coaching accelerates growth-oriented opportunities.
practices being implemented in teacher growth. Three important strategies take
each school. Understanding these By David Baker, Catherine Carter, workplace conversations to the
elements is crucial for success, and Patricia Hagan, Temple Hayles, next level.
this is where the Literacy Rychie Rhodes, and Karen Smith
Classroom Visit Model can make One challenge the traditional
INDEX OF ADVERTISERS
Regent University....................................................................... inside front cover
Frontline Education.................................................................................................... 9
Just ASK Publications & Professional Development.... outside back cover
COACHING
THEORY
OF CHANGE Coaches
develop (over
time) efficacy and
effectiveness with
A
Teachers develop theory of change for coaching in which the
instructional efficacy ongoing professional
and effectiveness overarching purpose of coaching is to increase learning and
through coaching. student success, emphasizes that student success support.
depends on quality teaching. Every student deserves
access to the same level of high-quality teaching every
day. To ensure that teaching is of the highest quality,
teachers continuously grow and learn until they achieve
high levels of mastery with both content and pedagogy.
— Taking the Lead:
New Roles for Teachers and School-Based Coaches
Second edition
Coaches
establish
partnership
Coaches support Coaches coach agreements
teachers to teachers to and professional
implement refined extend and refine relationships with
professional professional principals and
practices. practice. teachers.
FROM THE BOOK The second edition System leaders may leaders will gain clarity
TAKING THE LEAD: updates Learning use Taking the Lead as about how to effectively
New roles for teachers Forward’s essential text they advocate the design fulfill 10 roles as they
and school-based about the complex and of a coaching program support teachers' ongoing
coaches Second edition multifaceted roles of focused on team, school, growth.
JOELLEN KILLION teacher leaders and school- and district learning goals. Order at store.
AND CINDY HARRISON based coaches. School-based teacher learningforward.org.
LEARNING FORWARD’S
STANDARDS FOR
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
M any of the articles in this issue of The Learning Professional demonstrate Learning
Forward’s Standards for Professional Learning in action. Use this tool to deepen your own
understanding of what standards implementation might look like and to explore implementation
in various contexts. In this issue, we highlight three examples.
Professional learning that
increases educator effectiveness
STANDARD IN ACTION TO CONSIDER
and results for all students ...
t In action: In “Accentuate 1. How do rubrics that describe
DATA the formative,” the levels of practice and
Learning Communities
… occurs within learning authors describe how video of classroom lessons
they use rubrics and complement each other, no
communities committed to
a video observation matter what content teachers
continuous improvement, process to strengthen are covering?
collective responsibility, and goal teachers’ use of 2. What kinds of data are
alignment. formative assessment available to educators in
to improve student videos of authentic teaching
Leadership outcomes (p. 24). episodes?
… requires skillful leaders who t
In “I am mentor, I am 1. In what ways do coaches
develop capacity, advocate, IMPLEMENTATION coach,” the authors or mentors recognize the
and create support systems for describe how mentors challenges of change and
professional learning. of school leaders support educators throughout
adopt a coaching a change process?
Resources mindset to support the 2. What elements of a coaching
… requires prioritizing, development of learning or mentoring relationship
monitoring, and coordinating leaders in schools (p. 52). contribute to learners’
resources for educator learning. opportunities to reflect on
constructive feedback?
Data t
The article “Process for 1. How does developing sharp
… uses a variety of sources and OUTCOMES discovery” explores clarity around student
types of student, educator, and how an international standards contribute to
system data to plan, assess, and school supports an consistent instruction despite
evaluate professional learning. ever-changing faculty to teachers who come and go
effectively implement frequently?
project-based learning 2. What connections might
Learning Designs
for students (p. 35). schools or school systems
… integrates theories, research,
make between project-based
and models of human learning learning for students and
to achieve its intended how educators are supported
outcomes. to implement project-based
learning ?
Implementation ?
?
… applies research on change There are many other Bonus question:
FIND YOUR examples of the
and sustains support for
OWN! standards in action
Can you find other standards
implementation of professional within your story that are
learning for long-term change. throughout The
relevant? Many data stories,
Learning Professional.
for example, also deal with
Find a story that you
Outcomes implementation.
think exemplifies this
… aligns its outcomes with and create your own
educator performance and questions.
student curriculum standards.
ASK
323 pages
800-940-5434
www.justaskpublications.com