2023_AnalysisOfFuzzyQueueingModelsToOptimizeTheAverage
2023_AnalysisOfFuzzyQueueingModelsToOptimizeTheAverage
net/publication/369969914
CITATIONS READS
0 157
4 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Ebenesar Anna Bagyam on 12 April 2023.
Abstract
Single server batch arrival retry queue with varying modes of breakdowns and two stages of restoration is
considered under a fuzzy situation. Assuming the arrival, working, retry, breakdown, and repair rates are fuzzy;
a mathematical programming method is proposed to construct the membership function for the average system
size of the prescribed model. To convert a fuzzy repairable retrial queue into a family of crisp queues, the
alpha-cut technique and Zadeh's extension concept are utilised. Trapezoidal fuzzy numbers are used to
illustrate the strength of the proposed approach. Ranking fuzzy numbers play a huge role in decision-making
under fuzzy conditions. This ranking method is the most reliable, simple to apply, and used to find the
defuzzification of the syatem measures. A particular application in packet-switching network is given for a
better understanding of the model.
Key words: Fuzzy queue, Server Breakdown, packet switching network, Zadeh’s extension principle, alpha
cut approach, Trapezoidal fuzzy number
235
Analysis Of Fuzzy Queueing Models To Optimize The Average System Size In Packet-Switching Network
studied by Chen et al. (2020) for the optimum it is susceptible to one of the M modes of
and equilibrium techniques. Using approaches breakdowns. The failing server requires
from fuzzy logic and queuing theory, this work necessary repair based on the kind of
investigates the membership functions of the breakdown and optional common repair.
optimal and equilibrium procedures in both When a server breaks, it stops serving clients
tangible and intangible circumstances. In order and waits for the necessary repair to begin. The
to characterise the family of crisp techniques, time spent waiting for the server to be repaired
we build two parametric nonlinear is referred to as setup time. As quickly as the
programmes using Zadeh's extension concept necessary restoration is accomplished, the
and the alpha - cut methodology. Then, in customer may choose common repair with a
single and multi-server models, the particular probability p or deny with the
membership functions of the tactics are complimentary probability. Before the service
determined. To estimate the stability approach provider went down, the client who was now
in the fuzzy intelligence, the grated mean receiving service either stayed in the service
integration approach is also used. position with probbaility r or left the amenity
area with complementary probability and kept
Kannadasan and Padmavathi (2021) discussed coming back with certain rate. Once repaired,
about the fuzzy techniques with use of the server either waits for the same client or
hexagonal fuzzy numbers and the authors have resumes serving the client who was stopped.
acquired the fuzzy environment with the This period of waiting is known as reserved
presence of numerical results. Revathi and time. Until the interrupted consumer exits the
Selvakumari (2021) given the priority system, the server cannot accept new clients.
disciplines of fuzzy retrial models. Fuzzy If the server is busy or unavailable, it is
retrial queue model is applied to most of the referred to as blocked. (Ebenesar Anna
telecommunication systems. In this paper, we Bagyam and Udayachandrika, 2018)
can find the suitable application of the
prescribed model in a packet-switching 2.1 Notations Used
network. As a result, a single server batch - Arrival rate - service rate - retrial
arrival retry queue with varying modes of rate
breakdowns and two stages of restoration - failure rate 1, 2 - necessary and common
would be appropriate for the above-stated reapir rates
problem. The major goal of this article is to - setup rate m1 and m2 - First two moments
analyze the mean system size under fuzzy of the batch arrival
conditions.
2.2 Solution Methodology
The remaining part of the paper is organised as Assume that the arrival rate (), retrial rate (),
follows:: The construction of a fuzzy service rate (), setup rate (), essential repair
repairable queue is given in Section 2. By rate (1) and common repair rate (2) are
considering arrival, service, and repair rates as ~ ~, , ~
a trapezoidal fuzzy numbers, numerical results represented by fuzzy numbers , ~ , 1
~
are given in Section 4. Section 5 presents and 2 respectively. Let ~ ( x), ~ ( y),
results and discussion based on the numerical
~ (s) , ~ (v1 ) , ~ (v 2 ) and ~ ( v 3 ) denote
illustration. Finally, in the last section, the 1 2
conclusion has been drawn by highlighting the the membership functions of the
novelty of the investigation. corresponding parameters. Then we have
~
= {(x, ~ ( x )) / x X}
2 Construction of Fuzzy Repairable Retrial ~
Queue = {(y, ~ ( y )) / y Y}
2.1 Overview of the Model ~ = {(s, ~ ( s)) / s S}
Single server batch arrival queue with M ~ = {(v1, ~ ( v )) / v1 V1}
1
modes of breakdown and two stages of repair
~
with retrial is considered under a fuzzy 1 = {(v2, ~ ( v 2 )) / v2 V2}
1
environment. Although the server is running,
236
Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences 10(1) 234-240 2023
~
and 2 = {(v3, ~ ( v 3 )) / v3 V3}
M
x m1
2 T1 = 1 – [1 + i T4] + m1 (1 – A
s i =1
237
Analysis Of Fuzzy Queueing Models To Optimize The Average System Size In Packet-Switching Network
where L(z) = inverse of ( L s ) L = Left shape the membership function L~ (z) for different
s
0
~
Where [ ( L s ) L , (L s ) U ] is the -cuts of L s .
3 Numerical Illustration
Assume that arrival rate, retry rate, working
rate, setup rate, essential repair rate and
optional repair rates are trapezoidal fuzzy Fig. 1 Mean System Size’s Membership
~
number such that = [0.5, 1, 1.5, 2], ~ = [25, Function
~ ~
26, 27, 28], = [28, 29, 30, 31], = [5, 6, 7,
~ ~
8], 1 = [15, 16, 17, 18] and 2 = [17, 18, 19,
20] with the fixed values M = 4, i = 2.5, m1 = Mean System Size
2, m2 = 6, pi = 0.6, ri = 0.5 and i = 5 (i = 1, 2,
3, 4).
The values of ( L s ) L and (L s ) U are obtained
as
(L s ) L = [( + 1) (− 2 8 + 241 7 − 9153 6
+ 26506 5 + 7631928 4 Fig. 2 -cut values of Mean System Size
− 239135100 3 + 3300827064 2 −
22186570720 4 Discussion on the Results
+ 59110464000)] / [10 ( − 8) ( − 18) ( − The range of the system length for possibility
20) (5 5 – 515 4 level alpha = 1 is about [1.4479, 3.9387],
+ 19061 3 – 308961 2 + 2091714 − suggesting that it is certainly feasible that the
4244640)] expected number of consumers in the system
and falls between 1.4479, 3.9387, however this is
(L s ) U = [− ( − 4) (− 2 8 − 193 7 − 4596 uncertain. The range of the system length for
possibility level alpha = 0 is around [0.4835,
6 + 95723 5 + 7010268 4 18.6644] at the other extreme. This range
+ 149453025 3 + 1557960000 2 + suggests that the mean system size will never
8015423125 fall below 0.4835 or increase above 18.6644.
+ 16420016250)] / [10 ( + 5) ( + 15) ( + 4.6877 is the predicted system size when
17) (5 5 + 440 4 utilising the Yager ranking index approach.
+ 13331 3 + 163872 2 + 699000 + The information mentioned above will be very
276000)] beneficial when developing a queueing
system.
Because of complexity in finding the closed
form expression of devloping we analyze 5 Practical Application of the model
L~ (z) numerically. The numerical result of Our retrial queue has potential uses in a
s
packet-switching network, where messages
238
Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences 10(1) 234-240 2023
239
Analysis Of Fuzzy Queueing Models To Optimize The Average System Size In Packet-Switching Network
240