1 s2.0 S0026265X18318599 Main
1 s2.0 S0026265X18318599 Main
Microchemical Journal
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/microc
Keywords: A new liquid phase microextraction method based on deep eutectic solvent microextraction was developed for
Edible oil samples separation and preconcentration of lead, cobalt, nickel and manganese from edible oil samples like sunflower oil,
Microextraction baby oil, trout, waste frying oil and syrup-soaked pastry oil. A choline chloride deep eutectic solvent was used for
Trace element microextraction. After extraction, analytical concentrations were determined by flame atomic absorption
Deep eutectic solvent
spectrometry. Effects of analytical parameters such as type and volume of deep eutectic solvent, sample volume,
Flame atomic absorption spectrometry
and temperature on extraction efficiency of lead, cobalt, nickel and manganese were optimized. The recoveries
were generally > 95%. The relative standard deviation (RSD, %, n = 7) of 50 μg/ L of analyte elements was in
the range of 0.9–4.3%. Accuracy of presented microextraction method was checked by addition-recovery studies
to oil samples. The presented deep eutectic solvent microextraction method was finally applied to edible oil
samples and waste oils with different properties for the determination of analyte contents.
1. Introduction classical organic solvents [31–33]. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) are
typically formed by mixing an appropriate amount of a hydrogen bond
Elements at trace levels have important positive and negative roles acceptor such as choline chloride salt (ChCl, Vitamin B4) with safe
in human life. Some of them such as copper, zinc and manganese are hydrogen bond donors (e.g. urea, glycerol, sugars, carboxylic acids,
necessary for health life [1–3], others like cadmium, lead and arsenic etc.). DESs were prepared from ChCl provide many advantages such as
are non-necessary for our life [4–6]. Their determinations in environ- low price, easy to prepare by simply mixing components, no need to
mental and food samples are given important information about their further purification, most of them are biodegradable, biocompatible
sources and their levels for human [7–10]. Flame atomic absorption and non-toxic when compared to organic solvents and ionic liquids used
spectrometry (FAAS) is one of the popular and main instruments in the in the microextraction methods [34–37].
determinations of metals at trace levels [11–14]. However, thre main Oils are very important food all around world. The human uses oils
disadvantage of FAAS is the high instrumental detection limits [15–18]. in the diet for three purposes, as an energy source, as a structural
In order to solve this problem, analytical chemist are used separation- component and to make powerful biological regulators [38–40]. The
preconcentration methods including solid phase extraction, coprecipi- quality of edible oils is directly related to the level of trace metals
tation, and membrane filtration [19–25]. [41–43]. The levels of metals at trace levels in oil samples are known to
Microextraction procedures are very popular at last decade for the increase the rate of oil oxidation. The presence of metals at trace levels
separation-preconcentration of traces inorganic and organic species due in edible oils may be due to different factors: The metal ions at trace
to their advantages including short extraction times, minimum usage of levels in the oil samples can be incorporated in to the oil from the soil of
organic solvents, high preconcentration factors etc. [26–31]. In the the area or be introduced during the manufacturing of food samples
microextraction studies for trace species, new generation solvents like [44–48].
supramoleculer solvents, switchable solvents and deep eutectic solvents A deep eutectic solvent microextraction procedure for the separa-
that are the member of green chemistry were generally preferred than tion and preconcentration of lead, cobalt, nickel and manganese from
⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Soylak).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.04.006
Received 16 December 2018; Received in revised form 1 March 2019; Accepted 1 April 2019
Available online 02 April 2019
0026-265X/ © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
M. Soylak and M. Koksal Microchemical Journal 147 (2019) 832–837
some oil samples has been established in this work. The concentration 2.2. Reagents and solutions
of the analyte elements were determined by using microsampling flame
atomic absorption spectrometric determinations. High purity analytical grade reagents were used. All solutions were
prepared with reverse osmosis purified water (Millipore Milli-Q system
18 MΩ cm−1 resistivity). Stock solutions of the analyte elements were
2. Experimental prepared from their nitrates as 1000 mg L−1, solutions in 0.02 M HNO3.
The working solutions that contain 25 mg L−1 of each analytes were
2.1. Instruments daily prepared by diluting stock solutions.
Except if otherwise stated, analytical-grade lactic acid, oxalic acid,
The instrumental detection system used was a PerkinElmer Model ethyl glycol were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Choline
3110 flame atomic absorption spectrometer (Norwalk, CT, USA) chloride (ChCl) was purchased from Alfa Aesar (Karlsruhe Germany).
equipped with a 10 cm a long slot-burner and hollow cathode lamps of
lead, cobalt, nickel and manganese. The instrument was run under the
conditions suggested by the manufacturer. The samples were injected to 2.3. Preparation of deep eutectic solvents
the FAAS by using micro injection system, which consist of a mini
home-made Teflon funnel with an Eppendorf Pipette [29,32]. The Te- DESs are prepared from available salts and hydrogen bond donors in
flon funnel was connected to the nebulizer of FAAS with capillary laboratory conditions. DESs were prepared by mixing different mole
tubing. The measurements were performed with the continuous as- ratios of ChCl with oxalic acid (1:2 mol), ChCl with ethylene glycol
piration mode of FAAS. A hundred μL of extraction phase was injected (1:2 mol), ChCl with lactic acid (1:2 mol) and ChCl with urea (1:2 mol).
to the micro-injection unit by using Eppendorf pipette and peak heights They were prepared on the water bath by heating choline chlor-
were recorded as signals. ide‑hydrogen bond donors and to 80 °C with constant stirring with
The peak heights were recorded as signals. A Nel pH -900 pH meter magnetic stirrer for 2 min until a homogeneous liquid was formed.
(Ankara, Turkey) with a combined glass electrode was used for the pH
measurements. An RS-VA10 vortex mixer (Phoenix Instrument, 2.4. Microextraction procedure for oil samples
Germany) was used to assist the extraction process. An RH Basic Model
magnetic stirrer (IKA, Germany) was used. A Rotofix 32A Model The presented microextraction procedure was applied to a sun-
(Hettich, Germany) centrifuge was also used. flower oil sample for the optimization of the procedure. 200 μL of
833
M. Soylak and M. Koksal Microchemical Journal 147 (2019) 832–837
Table 1 100
Influence of DES type on the recoveries of analytes (N = 3).
Recovery, % 80
Recovery, %
ChCl with oxalic ChCl with ChCl with lactic ChCl with urea 60
acid (1:2 mol) ethylene glycol acid (1:2 mol) (1:2 mol)
(1:2 mol) Co(II)
40 Ni(II)
Pb(II) 100 ± 2 104 ± 8 97 ± 6 97 ± 5
Mn(II)
Co(II) 101 ± 4 96 ± 5 99 ± 2 95 ± 5 20
Ni(II) 94 ± 3 97 ± 4 98 ± 5 98 ± 2 Pb(II)
Mn(II) 99 ± 2 98 ± 6 102 ± 4 96 ± 4
0
100 200 300 400 500
working solution of that contain 25 mg L−1 of Pb(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and DES volume, µL
Mn(II) was introduced to 50 mL centrifuge tube, and followed by se- Fig. 2. The influences of DES volume on the recovery values of the analyte
quentially addition of 20 mL oil sample, and 300 μL of DESs. The elements (N = 3).
sample solution was vortex for 1 min, in result a monophase solution
was achieved. Then, 75 μL of HNO3 was added in the solution and the
100–500 μL of ChCl with urea (1:2 mol). The results are depicted in
obtained solution was placed into a water bath for 30 min at 100 °C.
Fig. 2. The quantitative recoveries of Pb(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Mn(II)
After this stage, it was wortexed 2 min. Then the prompt phase se-
ions were obtained with 200 μL of ChCl with urea (1:2 mol) and it was
paration was obtained by centrifuging sample mixture at 4000 rpm for
chosen as optimal value for further analysis.
5 min. At this stage, oil and DES rich phase were obtained. The DES was
decanted by the help of micropipette and methanol was added to re-
maining metal enrich DES phase up to final volume 1 mL to decrease 3.3. Effects of volume of nitric acid
the viscosity of DES. Then absorbance values for analyte elements were
measured by using micro-sample injection flame atomic absorption In order to deep eutectic solvent microextraction of analyte ele-
spectrometer (MS-FAAS). The schematic diagram of microextraction ments from oil phase to polar phase, acidic medium was selected by
procedure was given in Fig. 1. using different volume of concentrated nitric acid. Concentrated nitric
acid was added to oil samples at different volumes at the micro-
3. Results and discussions extraction stage. The results were given in Fig. 3. Quantitative re-
coveries were obtained with 75 and 100 μL of concentrated nitric acid.
3.1. Selection of extraction solvent type and volume 75 μL of concentrated nitric acid was selected as an optimal value.
The selection of the type of DES is a critical parameter for the 3.4. Effects of temperature of water bath for the extraction efficiencies
quantitative microextraction of the analytes [49–51]. Four different
DES at different composition given in Table 1 were prepared as an The influences of the temperature of the water bath on the extrac-
extraction solvents for presented work and the procedure given at “the tion efficiency of lead(II), cobalt(II), nickel(II) and manganese(II) for
procedure” section was applied to an oil sample for all DES solutions. As the presented microextraction procedure were also investigated chan-
can be seen in Table 1 in the quantitative recoveries were obtained for ging the temperature of water bath in the range of 20–100 °C. The
Pb(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Mn(II) ions with four different DES solutions. quantitative recoveries (> 95%) for each analyte elements were ob-
For further works, ChCl with urea DES solution was selected due to its tained at 100 °C of water bath temperature. 100 °C was selected as
easier preparation than other ones. optimal temperature for working temperature for the water bath.
The effects of the different combination on the ChCl with urea so-
lution on the recoveries of the analyte elements were examined under 3.5. Effects of extraction time
optimal working conditions. The results summarized in Table 2. The
quantitative results were obtained for lead(II), cobalt(II), nickel(II) and The effects of the extraction time in the range of 5–45 min at 100 °C
manganese(II) ions with the all working combination of the ChCl and on the water bath were investigated on the recoveries of Pb(II), Co(II),
urea given in Table 2. 1:2 mol Choline chloride with urea combination
were selected for further experiments.
100
3.2. Effect of DES volume
Recovery, %
80
The effects of volume of DES solution (ChCl with urea (1:2 mol)) on
the recoveries of the analyte elements were examined in the range of Co(II)
60
Table 2
Ni(II)
The effects of different combination on the ChCl with urea solution on the re- 40 Mn(II)
coveries of the analyte elements (N = 3).
Pb(II)
Recovery, % 20
ChCl with urea ChCl with urea ChCl with urea 50
75
(1:2 mol) (1:3 mol) (1:4 mol) 100
Pb(II) 97 ± 5 100 ± 4 98 ± 3 Volume of conc. HNO3, µL
Co(II) 95 ± 5 98 ± 5 95 ± 4
Ni(II) 98 ± 2 96 ± 4 101 ± 6
Fig. 3. The influences of volume of HNO3 on the recoveries of analyte elements
Mn(II) 96 ± 4 100 ± 5 94 ± 4
(N = 3).
834
M. Soylak and M. Koksal Microchemical Journal 147 (2019) 832–837
Table 3
Analytical characteristics of the presented procedure.
Analyte LODa, μg/L LOQb, μg/L Calibration graph equation R2 Linear range after microextraction, μg/L
c
Pb 2.4 7.9 A = 0.005C - 0.0007 0.997 5–60
Co 4.6 15.2 A = 0.022C - 0.0004 0.986 5–30
Ni 7.5 24.8 A = 0.015C - 0.0030 0.992 10–50
Mn 1.0 3.3 A = 0.072C + 0.0031 0.997 2.5–25
a
LOD: limit of detection.
b
LOQ: limit of quantification.
c
A = the measured absorbance values for FAAS and C = Concentration of analyte element in last phase.
Table 4
Application of the presented microextraction procedure to waste frying sunflower oil and syrup-soaked pastry oil (N = 3).
Waste frying sunflower oil Syrup-soaked pastry oil
Pb 0 BLQ – 0 BLQ –
1.87 1.92 ± 0.50⁎ 103 1.25 1.24 ± 0.02 99
3.75 3.77 ± 0.10 101 2.56 2.71 ± 0.30 106
Co 0 BLQ – 0 BLQ –
1.87 1.82 ± 0.50 97 1.25 1.24 ± 0.60 99
3.75 3.81 ± 0.10 102 2.56 2.49 ± 0.01 97
Ni 0 BLQ – 0 BLQ –
1.87 1.85 ± 0.05 99 1.25 1.21 ± 0.01 97
3.75 3.69 ± 0.10 98 2.56 2.45 ± 0.10 96
Mn 0 BLQ – 0 2.12 ± 0.10 –
1.87 1.78 ± 0.06 95 1.25 3.45 ± 0.05 96
3.75 3.82 ± 0.05 102 2.56 4.50 ± 0.00 93
Table 5
Application of the presented microextraction procedure to baby oil and trout oil (N = 3).
Baby oil Trout oil
Pb 0 BLQ – 0 BLQ –
0.63 0.65 ± 0.05⁎ 103 0.63 0.63 ± 0.02 100
1.25 1.23 ± 0.10 98 1.25 1.25 ± 0.05 100
Co 0 BLQ – 0 BLQ –
0.63 0.62 ± 0.06 98 0.63 0.64 ± 0.30 102
1.25 1.29 ± 0.20 103 1.25 1.28 ± 0.02 102
Ni 0 BLQ – 0 BLQ –
0.63 0.64 ± 0.05 102 0.63 0.61 ± 0.01 97
1.25 1.21 ± 0.10 97 1.25 1.25 ± 0.30 100
Mn 0 BLQ – 0 0.50 ± 0.01 –
0.63 0.64 ± 0.07 102 0.63 1.13 ± 0.05 100
1.25 1.25 ± 0.05 101 1.25 1.78 ± 0.00 102
Table 6
The comparison of the methods for separation and preconcentration of the trace element from oil samples in literature.
Analytes Detection system method Detection limit, μg L−1 Preconcentration Factor Ref
−1
Pb, Cd Electrothermal atomic absorption Deep eutectic liquid organic salt as a new solvent Pb: 8 ng kg , 195 35
spectrometry for liquid-phase microextraction Cd: 0.2 ng kg−1
Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Pb, Flame and electrothermal atomic Microwave digestion- direct determination – – 39
Co, Cd, absorption spectrometry
Cd, Pb Electrothermal atomic absorption Micro-solid phase extraction Cd: 0.002 ng/g, – 52
spectrometry Pb: 0.02 ng/g
Pb, Co, Ni, Mn Flame atomic absorption spectrometry Deep eutectic solvent microextraction Pb: 2.4, Co: 4.6, Ni: 100 This
7.5,Mn: 1.0 work
835
M. Soylak and M. Koksal Microchemical Journal 147 (2019) 832–837
Ni(II) and Mn(II) ions on the presented DES microextraction system for References
oil samples. The recoveries for analyte ions were quantitative at 30 min
of extraction time at 100 °C. 30 min were used for further works. [1] I.I. Ozyigit, O.L. Uyanik, N.R. Sahin, I.E. Yalcin, G. Demir, Monitoring the pollution
level in Istanbul Coast of the Sea of Marmara using algal species Ulva lactuca L, Pol.
J. Environ. Stud. 26 (2017) 773–778.
3.6. Effects of sample volume [2] D. Mendil, Z. Demirci, M. Tuzen, M. Soylak, Seasonal investigation of trace element
contents in commercially valuable fish species from the Black Sea, Turkey, Food
Due to the sample volume is a critical parameter in the extraction of Chem. Toxicol. 48 (2010) 865–870.
[3] N. Bilandzic, I.T. Gajger, M. Kosanovic, B. Calopek, M. Sedak, B.S. Kolanovic,
the metal ions from the real samples [52–59], the influences of the I. Varenina, D.B. Luburic, I. Varga, M. Dokic, Essential and toxic element con-
volume of the oil samples on the extraction efficiency of Pb(II), Co(II), centrations in monofloral honeys from southern Croatia, Food Chem. 234 (2017)
Ni(II) and Mn(II) ions were investigated in the range of 5–20 mL of oil. 245–253.
[4] S. Aydin-Onen, M. Ozturk, Investigation of heavy metal pollution in eastern Aegean
The quantitative recoveries were obtained for analyte elements till Sea coastal waters by using Cystoseira barbata, Patella caerulea, and Liza aurata as
20 mL of oil. The preconcentration factor was calculated as 100 when biological indicators, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 (2017) 7310–7334.
the sample volume and final volume were 20 mL and 0.2 mL, respec- [5] G. Tel-Cayan, M. Öztürk, M.E. Duru, M. Yabanli, A. Türkoğlu, Content of minerals
and trace elements determined by ICP-MS in eleven mushroom species from ana-
tively.
tolia, Turkey, Chiang Mai Journal of Science 44 (2017) 939–945.
[6] M.S. Dundar, H. Altundag, A. Yılmaz, Heavy metal determination of unfertilised
3.7. Analytical features of the presented microextraction procedure vegetables and univariate analysis of the results, J. Chem. Metrol. 11 (2017) 23–30.
[7] S. Mol, F.S. Karakulak, S. Ulusoy, Assessment of potential health risks of heavy
metals to the general public in Turkey via consumption of red mullet, whiting,
Analytical characteristics of the presented procedure were given in turbot from the Southwest Black Sea, Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 17 (2017)
Table 3. The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated as the ratio be- 1135–1143.
tween three times the standard deviation 3 s/m of 7 blank solution [8] S.C.H. Mary, S. Sundaravadivel, R. Ramabai, A. Lawrence, Assessment of heavy
metals in coastal water and fish samples from Kalapet area, Pondicherry, Int. J.
readings and the slope value of the calibration curve after pre- Pharm. Sci. Res. 8 (2017) 756–762.
concentration [60–63]. The limit of quantification (LOQ) for the pro- [9] U. Divrikli, N. Horzum, M. Soylak, L. Elci, Trace heavy metal contents of some
posed DES microextraction method was calculated from the eq. 10s/ m, spices and herbal plants from Western Anatolia-Turkey, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 41
(2006) 712–716.
where s represents standard deviation of the ten blank solutions and m [10] G. Kaya, S. Turkoglu, Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in various tissues of some
is the slope of the calibration curve (Table 3). The linear calibration fish species and green tiger shrimp (Penaeus semisulcatus) from İskenderun Bay,
graph was obtained using the proposed method at optimum values for Turkey, and risk assessment for human health, Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 180 (2017)
314–326.
analyte elements separately (Table 3). The relative standard deviation [11] A.A. Al-Homaidan, Accumulation of nickel by marine macroalgae from the Saudi
(RSD, %) for analysis of seven analysis of 50 μg/L of each analyte ele- coast of the Arabian Gulf, Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment 6 (2008)
ments was calculated in the range of 0.9–4.3%. 148–151.
[12] M. Soylak, A. Uzun, L. Elci, Chemical analysis of industrial waste water samples
from some metal and textile plants in the organized industrial region of Kayseri-
3.8. Application of the presented microextraction procedure to oil samples Turkey, Kuwait Journal of Science and Engineering 28 (2001) 151–160.
[13] Md.S. Islam, Md.K. Ahmed, Md. Habibullah-Al-Mamun, Heavy metals in sediment
The proposed method was applied directly to different oil samples and their accumulation in commonly consumed fish species in Bangladesh, Archives
of Environmental & Occupational Health 72 (2017) 26–38.
from Kayseri-Turkey without any pretreatment. For this purpose, 20 mL [14] A.C. Yeltekin, A.R. Oguz, The variations in the levels of some metals in the different
of oil sample was transferred a tube and the procedure given in “test tissues of van fish (alburnus tarichi, guldenstadt 1814) according to gender and
procedure” section was applied. The results are given in Table 4 for weight, Fresenius Environ. Bull. 26 (2017) 864–871.
[15] L. Elci, M. Soylak, A. Uzun, E. Buyukpatir, M. Dogan, Determination of trace im-
waste frying sunflower oil and syrup-soaked pastry oil and in Table 5 purities in some nickel compounds by flame atomic absorption spectrometry after
for baby oil and trout oil. Generally, for the analyte elements, the solid phase extraction using amberlite XAD-16 resin, Fresenius Journal of Analytical
quantitative recovery values were obtained on the addition-recovery Chemistry 368 (2000) 358–361.
[16] T. Karatas, Comparison of micro and macro element levels in the muscle tissues and
tests. blood electrolytes of different salmonid species, Journal of Animal and Plant
Sciences 28 (2018) 1887–1892.
3.9. Comparison with other methods [17] O.M. Nassar, H.A. Nasr, M.H. El-Sayed, A.E.-N.A. Kobisi, Heavy metal levels in some
popular vegetables from some selected markets in Saudi Arabia, Egypt. J. Bot. 58
(2018) 627–638.
The presented separation-preconcentration procedure for oil sam- [18] M. Ghaedi, M. Montazerozohori, S. Haghdoust, F. Zaare, M. Soylak, Diaion HP-2MG
ples were compared with the some methods in literature at Table 6. modified with 2-(2,6-dichloro benzylideneamino) benzenethiol as new adsorbent
for solid phase extraction and flame atomic absorption determination of metal ions,
There is a limited application of the multi-element separation-pre-
Human & Experimental Toxicology 32 (2013) 371–378.
concentration of trace metal ions. The presented procedure is a multi- [19] S. Saracoglu, M. Soylak, L. Elci, M. Dogan, Determination of Cu, Fe, Ni, Co, Pb, Cd,
element separation-preconcentration based on microextraction by using Mn and Cr in natural water samples after solid phase extraction on Chromosorb
DES. The detection limits of the procedure are good for flame atomic 102, Anal. Lett. 35 (2002) 2603–2616.
[20] Z. Sarikhani, M. Manoochehri, Determination of ultra trace Cr(III) and Cr(VI)
absorption spectrometric determinations of trace elements. species by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry after simultaneous
magnetic solid phase extraction with the aid of a novel imidazolium-functionalized
4. Conclusions magnetite graphene oxide nanocomposite, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 90 (2017)
746–753.
[21] A.R. Ipeaiyeda, A.R. Ayoade, Flame atomic absorption spectrometric determination
A green preconcentration-separation procedure based on deep eu- of heavy metals in aqueous solution and surface water preceded by co-precipitation
tectic solvent based on microextraction of Pb(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Mn procedure with copper(II) 8-hydroxyquinoline, Appl Water Sci 7 (2017)
4449–4459.
(II) in various oil samples has been established prior to their flame [22] M. Soylak, Determination of trace amounts of copper in metallic aluminium sam-
atomic absorption spectrometric determination of them. The analyte ples after separation and preconcentration on an activated carbon column,
elements were quantitatively recovered by using 200 μL of ChCl with Fresenius Environ. Bull. 7 (1998) 383–387.
[23] S. Sayin, M.S. Engin, S. Eymur, S. Çay, Synthesis and characterization of 1-(2-
urea (1:2 mol) at 100 °C. The relative standard deviation (RSD, %) for
furoyl) piperazine calix[4]arene for the preconcentration of metal ions, Anal. Lett.
the determinations was in the range of 0.9–4.3%. 51 (2018) 111–118.
[24] M. Tuzen, M. Soylak, Multi-element coprecipitation for separation and enrichment
of heavy metal ions for their flame atomic absorption spectrometric determinations,
Acknowledgement
J. Hazard. Mater. 162 (2009) 724–729.
[25] F. Tokay, S. Bagdat, Preconcentration and determination of metal ions using
This work is supported by Unit of the Scientific Research Project of fluorescein modified silica gel and inductively coupled plasma – optical emission
Erciyes University-Turkey (Project no: TYL-2016-6459). The authors spectrometry, Anal. Lett. 51 (2018) 119–132.
[26] M. Rahmani, M. Kaykhaii, M.H. No, Application of dispersive liquid-liquid
thank to Dr. Erkan Yilmaz for his helps.
836
M. Soylak and M. Koksal Microchemical Journal 147 (2019) 832–837
microextraction in narrow-bore tube for preconcentration and spectrophotometric [47] M. Zeiner, I. Steffan, I.J. Cindric, Determination of trace elements in olive oil by ICP
determination of cadmium in aqueous samples, Eurasian J. Anal. Chem. 12 (2017) AES and ETA-AAS: a pilot study on the geographical characterization, Microchem.
197–209. J. 81 (2005) 171–176.
[27] S. Chen, J. Yan, J. Li, Y. Zhang, D.B. Lu, A novel method of combining solid phase [48] A.N. Anthemidis, V. Arvanitidis, J.A. Stratis, On-line emulsion formation and multi-
extraction with solidified floating organic drop microextraction for speciation of element analysis of edible oils by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission
inorganic arsenic in wastewater samples by electrothermal vaporization ICP-MS, At. spectrometry, Anal. Chim. Acta 537 (2005) 271–278.
Spectrosc., 38 (2017) 12–17. [49] M. Karimi, S. Dadfarnia, A.M.H. Shabani, Application of deep eutectic solvent
[28] C. Karadas, D. Kara, Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification modified cotton as a sorbent for online solid-phase extraction and determination of
of floating organic drop for preconcentration and determination of trace amounts of trace amounts of copper and nickel in water and biological samples, Biol. Trace
copper by flame atomic absorption spectrometry, Food Chem. 220 (2017) 242–248. Elem. Res. 176 (2017) 207–215.
[29] E. Yilmaz, M. Soylak, Ionic liquid-linked dual magnetic microextraction of lead(II) [50] E. Bagda, H. Altundag, M. Tuzen, M. Soylak, A novel selective deep eutectic solvent
from environmental samples prior to its micro-sampling flame atomic absorption extraction method for versatile determination of copper in sediment samples by
spectrometric determination, Talanta 116 (2013) 882–886. ICP-OES, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 99 (2017) 264–269.
[30] M. Khajeh, S. Pedersen-Bjergaard, M. Bohlooli, A. Barkhordar, M. Ghaffari- [51] F. Aydin, E. Yilmaz, M. Soylak, A simple and novel deep eutectic solvent based
Moghaddam, Maghemite nanoparticle-decorated hollow fiber electromembrane ultrasound-assisted emulsification liquid phase microextraction method for mala-
extraction combined with dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for determina- chite green in farmed and ornamental aquarium fish water samples, Microchem. J.
tion of thymol from Carum copticum, J. Sci. Food Agric. 97 (2017) 1517–1523. 132 (2017) 280–285.
[31] G.L. Scheel, C.R.T. Tarley, Feasibility of supramolecular solvent-based micro- [52] L. Yao, H. Liu, X. Wang, W. Xu, Y. Zhu, H. Wang, L. Pang, C. Lin, Ultrasound-
extraction for simultaneous preconcentration of herbicides from natural waters assisted surfactant-enhanced emulsification microextraction using a magnetic ionic
with posterior determination by HPLC-DAD, Microchem. J. 133 (2017) 650–657. liquid coupled with micro-solid phase extraction for the determination of cadmium
[32] E. Yilmaz, M. Soylak, Switchable solvent-based liquid phase microextraction of and lead in edible vegetable oils, Food Chem. 256 (2018) 212–218.
copper(II): optimization and application to environmental samples, J. Anal. At. [53] M. Soylak, I. Narin, L. Elci, M. Dogan, Atomic absorption spectrometric determi-
Spectrom. 30 (2015) 1629–1635. nation of copper, cadmium, Lead and nickel in urine samples after enrichment and
[33] L. Liu, W. Tang, B. Tang, D. Hanc, K.H. Rowd, T. Zhu, Pipette-tip solid-phase ex- separation procedure on an activated carbon column, Trace Elements and
traction based on deep-eutectic-solvent-modified graphene for the determination of Electrolytes 16 (1999) 131–134.
sulfamerazine in river water, J. Sep. Sci. 40 (2017) 1887–1895. [54] O.A. Urucu, F. Dönmez, E.K. Yetimoglu, Solidified floating organic drop micro-
[34] A. Shishov, A. Bulatov, M. Locatelli, S. Carradori, V. Andruch, Application of deep extraction for the detection of trace amount of lead in various samples by electro-
eutectic solvents in analytical chemistry. A review, Microchem. J. 135 (2017) thermal atomic absorption spectrometry, Journal of Analytical Methods in
33–38. Chemistry 2017 (2017) 6268975.
[35] S. Dadfarnia M. Karimi A.M.H. Shabani, D. Azadi, F. Tamaddon, Deep eutectic li- [55] M. Ghaedi, R. Shabani, A. Shokrollahi, M. Montazerozohori, A. Sahraiean,
quid organic salt as a new solvent for liquid-phase microextraction and its appli- M. Soylak, Preconcentration and separation of trace amount of copper(II) on N1, N2-
cation in ligandless extraction and preconcentration of lead and cadmium in edible bis(4-fluorobenzylidene)ethane-1,2-diamine loaded on Sepabeads SP70, J. Hazard.
oils. Talanta 144 (2015) 648–654. Mater. 170 (2009) 169–174.
[36] E. Yilmaz, M. Soylak, Ultrasound assisted-deep eutectic solvent extraction of iron [56] H. Abdolmohammad-Zadeh, M. Galeh-Assadi, S. Shabkhizan, H. Mousazadeh, Sol-
from sheep, bovine and chicken liver samples, Talanta 136 (2015) 170–173. gel processed pyridinium ionic liquid-modified silica as a new sorbent for separa-
[37] E. Yilmaz, M. Soylak, Latest trends, green aspects and innovations in liquid-phase- tion and quantification of iron in water samples, Arab. J. Chem. 9 (2016)
based microextraction techniques: a review, Turk. J. Chem. 40 (2016) 868–893. S587–S594.
[38] S. Naz, H. Sheikh, R. Siddiqi, S.A. Sayed, Oxidative stability of olive, corn and [57] M.H. Pourjavid Hosseini, M. Rezaee, M. Ashouri, Investigation of adsorption me-
soybean oil under different conditions, Food Chem. 88 (2004) 253–259. chanism of Fe, Cu, and Zn ions in extraction and preconcentration process on
[39] D. Mendil, O.D. Uluozlu, M. Tuzen, M. Soylak, Investigation of the levels of some synthesized graphene oxide using an indole derivative, Struct. Chem. 29 (2018)
element in edible oil samples produced in Turkey by atomic absorption spectro- 615–624.
metry, J. Hazard. Mater. 165 (2009) 724–728. [58] M. Soylak, Y. Akkaya, Separation/and preconcentration of xylenol orange metal
[40] S.R. Bozhanov, I.B. Karadjova, Determination of trace metals in Bulgarian lavender complexes on amberlite XAD-16 column for their determination by flame atomic
oil by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry, J. Essent. Oil Res. 20 (2008) absorption spectrometry, Journal of Trace and Microprobe Techniques 21 (2003)
549–555. 455–466.
[41] R.M. Souza, B.M. Mathias, C.L.P. Silveira, R.Q. Aucelio, Inductively coupled plasma [59] A. Karatepe, M. Soylak, Sea sponge as a low cost biosorbent for solid phase ex-
optical emission spectrometry for trace multi-element determination in vegetable traction of some heavy metal ions and determination by flame atomic absorption
oils, margarine and butter after stabilization with propan-1-ol and water, spectrometry, J. AOAC Int. 97 (2014) 1689–1695.
Spectrochim. Acta 60B (2005) 711–715. [60] J.A. Baig, A.A. Bhutto, S. Uddin, T.G. Kazi, M.I. Khan, Quantification of hexavalent
[42] J.R. Castillo M.S. Jimenez L. Ebdon Semiquantitative simultaneous determination chromium in surface water samples by a selective electrochemical method, J. AOAC
of metals in olive oil using direct emulsion nebulization. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 14 Int. 101 (2018) 577–586.
(1999) 1515–1518. [61] M. Soylak, G. Onal, Determination of trace metals by atomic absorption spectro-
[43] S.Q. Li, X.M. He, P. Du, M. Wang, H. Chen, M.C. Wu, Determination of lead in metry after coprecipitation with europium hydroxide, J. Hazard. Mater. 137 (2006)
microemulsified rapeseed oil and bio-diesel oil by GFAAS, Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 1130–1134.
28 (2008) 2431–2435. [62] A. Thongsaw, R. Sananmuang, G.M. Ross, W.C. Chaiyasith, Solidified floating or-
[44] C. Benincasa, J. Lewis, E. Perri, G. Sindona, A. Tagarelli, Determination of trace ganic drop microextraction–electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry for the
element in Italian virgin olive oils and their characterization according to geo- determination of trace amounts of lead in water samples, Malaysian Journal of
graphical origin by statistical analysis, Anal. Chim. Acta 585 (2007) 366–370. Analytical Sciences 21 (2017) 72–81.
[45] M.M. Ozcan, Investigation on the mineral contents of capers (Capparis spp.) seed [63] B. Ebrahimi, Modified activated carbon prepared from acorn shells as a new solid-
oils growing wild in Turkey, J. Med. Food 11 (2008) 596–599. phase extraction sorbent for the preconcentration and determination of trace
[46] K. Tanilgan, M.M. Ozcan, A. Unver, Physical and chemical characteristics of five amounts of nickel in food samples prior to flame atomic absorption spectrometry, J.
Turkish olive (Olea europea L.) varieties and their oils, Grasas Aceites 58 (2007) AOAC Int. 100 (2017) 553–559.
142–147.
837