12/24/24, 12:30 AM Freedom of Speech and Expression in India - GitMind

Freedo… Auto-save Share

Freedom of speech and expression is enshrined as a

fundamental right in the Indian Constitution, allowing
Fundamental Right individuals to express their thoughts and opinions freely.

The right to freedom of speech is not absolute and is subject

to reasonable restrictions in certain circumstances. These
restrictions ensure the balance between individual rights and
societal interests.
Media plays a crucial role in promoting freedom of speech
and expression, but it also faces challenges such as
censorship and regulations. Media Freedom Speech that threatens the sovereignty and
nation can be restricted to protect the cou
Sovereignty and Integrity of India disintegration or external threats.
Article 19(1)(a)
Censorship involves the suppression of speech, media, or Indian Constitution
other forms of expression deemed objectionable or harmful,
impacting the freedom of expression. Censorship Speech that compromises national security or poses a t
to the safety and well-being of the state can be lawfully
Security of the State restricted.
Hate speech refers to expressions that incite violence or
prejudicial action against individuals based on attributes
such as race, religion, or ethnicity, which can lead to societal Restrictions can be imposed on speech that incites violence
discord. Hate Speech or disrupts public peace and order, ensuring a harmonious
Related Aspects Public Order society.

Sedition laws restrict speech that incites rebellion or violence Reasonable Restrictions
against the authority of the state, often drawing debates Speech that is obscene or violates societal norms of dec
about their implications on free speech. Sedition Decency or Morality and morality may be restricted to maintain social ethics

The Right to Information Act promotes transparency and Expressions that may undermine the authority of the cou
accountability, enabling citizens to access information held or the judiciary can result in legal action for contempt of
by public authorities, thus enhancing freedom of expression. Right to Information Contempt of Court court.

Statements that harm an individual's reputation without

A pivotal case that expanded the interpretation of Article 21 truth or justification can be subject to legal consequences
and emphasized the importance of personal liberty and due
process. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India Freedom of Speech and Defamation under defamation laws.

Expression in India
Speech that incites or encourages others to comm
This case struck down Section 66A of the IT Act, affirming the Incitement to an Offence offense can be restricted to prevent unlawful acts.
constitutional right to free speech in the digital realm. Shreya Singhal v. Union of India

Landmark Cases Defamation involves making false statements that damage a

A landmark judgment that addressed media regulation and
freedom of expression, emphasizing the right to publish person's reputation, which can be pursued legally by the
freely. Sakal Papers v. Union of India aggrieved party.

This case reinforced press freedom by striking down Libel refers to defamation in written or published form,
restrictions on the number of newspaper editions a where false statements are made against an individual,
publisher could have. Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India Defamation Libel leading to reputational damage.
Case Laws
A case that addressed the constitutionality of criminal Slander pertains to spoken defamatory statements, which
defamation laws, discussing the balance between reputation can harm an individual's reputation when communicated to
and free speech. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India Slander others.

This case highlighted the interplay between freedom of Defamation Cases Injunctions are court orders that can prohibit individuals
speech and the right to privacy, establishing that public from making certain statements or publications that may
figures have limited privacy rights in the context of public Law of Torts Injunctions lead to defamation or harm.
interest. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu

Remedies for defamation can involve various legal actions

and outcomes for the affected party.

Monetary compensation awarded for the harm caused to an

Remedies Damages individual's reputation due to defamatory statements.

Courts may also order public apologies to rectify the harm

Apologies caused by defamatory statements.

Mind Map 50%

https://gitmind.com/app/docs/md07tabd 1/1