Stem Cell Therapy For Autoimmune Disease 1st Edition Richard K. Burt (Author) 2024 Scribd Download
Stem Cell Therapy For Autoimmune Disease 1st Edition Richard K. Burt (Author) 2024 Scribd Download
https://ebookfinal.com/download/animal-models-for-stem-cell-
therapy-1st-edition-bruno-christ/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/cell-therapy-for-lung-disease-julia-
polak/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/gene-therapy-of-autoimmune-disease-
medical-intelligence-unit-1st-edition-gerald-j-prudhomme/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/advanced-surfaces-for-stem-cell-
research-1st-edition-ashutosh-tiwari/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/stem-cell-nanoengineering-1st-edition-
h-baharvand/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/stem-cell-renewal-and-cell-cell-
communication-methods-and-protocols-1st-edition-kursad-turksen/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/nails-diagnosis-therapy-surgery-third-
edition-richard-k-scher-md/
ebookfinal.com
Stem Cell Therapy for Autoimmune Disease 1st Edition
Richard K. Burt (Author) Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Richard K. Burt (Author)
ISBN(s): 9781587060311, 1000724670
Edition: 1
File Details: PDF, 110.93 MB
Year: 2004
Language: english
Stem Cell Therapy
for Autoimmune Disease
Stem Cell Therapy
for Autoimmune Disease
Richard K. Burt
Chief, Division o f Im m unotherapy
D epartm ent of M edicine
Feinberg School o f M edicine
N orthw estern University
Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Alberto M. Marmont
Professor Em eritus
Division of H em atology and Stem Cell T ransplantation
San M artin o ’s H ospital
Genoa, Italy
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish
reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the
consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this
publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has
not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by
any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or
in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www. copyright.com
(http://www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923,
978- 750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that
have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
TrademarkNotice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and
explanation without intent to infringe.
While the authors, editors and publisher believe rhat drug selection and dosage and the specifications and usage of equipment and
devices, as set forth in this book, are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the rime of publication, they make no
warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to material described in this book. In view of the ongoing research, equipment
development, changes in governmental regulations and the rapid accumulation of information relating to the biomedical sciences,
the reader is urged to carefully review and evaluate the information provided herein.
Stem cell therapy for autoimmune disease/ [edited by] Richard K. Burt,
Alberto M. Marmont.
p.; cm.
Includes index.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 1-58706-031-0
I. Autoimmune diseases--T reatment. 2. Stem cells--T ransplantation.
[DNLM: 1. Autoimmune Diseases--cherapy. 2. Stem Cell
Transplantation. WD 305 S824 2004] I. Burt, Richard K., 1956- II.
Marmont, A. M. (Alberto M.)
RC600.S746 2004
616.97'806--dc22
2003026938
T his b o o k is in appreciation o f the support, encouragem ent,
and patience o f m y w ife, Shalina, children, M ichael, Rajan, Reena, Shantha,
and m y patients w ho have allow ed m e the priviledge to be their doctor.
A ll o f w hom have been the inspiration to continue.
Richard K Burt
31. Mobilization and Conditioning Regimens 43. Haemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
in Stem Cell Transplant for Autoimmune for Rheumatoid Arthritis—World
Diseases 253 Experience and Future Trials 367
Ewa Carrier and Richard K. B urt John A. Snowden, John J. Moore,
Sarah J. Bingham, Steve Z . Pavletic
32. Infection in the Hematopoeitic Stem Cell a nd Richard K. B urt
Transplant Recipient with Autoimmune
Disease 44. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation
262
Valentina Stosor and Teresa R. Zem bower for Refractory Juvenile Idiopathic
Arthritis (JIA) 378
33. Immunological Aspects of Multiple Sclerosis Nico W ulffraat
with Emphasis on the Potential Use
o f Autologous Hemopoietic Stem Cell 45. Immunology of Scleroderma 388
Carol M. A rtlett
Transplantation 277
Paolo A. Muraro, H enry F. McFarland
and Roland M artin
46. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
for Systemic Sclerosis 398
34. Axonal Injury and Disease Progression A ndrew M. Yeager, D iane BuchBarker,
Thom as A. Medsger, Jr.
in Multiple Sclerosis 284 a nd A lbert D. Donnenberg
Carl B jartm ar a n d Bruce D. Trapp
Alberto M. Marmont
Professor Emeritus
Division of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation
San Martino’s Hospital
Genoa, Italy
Chapter 27, 36, 41, 5 7
CONTRIBUTORS
Mehrdad Abedi Evangelos Badiavas
Research Department Research Department
Roger Williams Medical Center Roger Williams Medical Center
Providence, Rhode Island, U.S .A. Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.A.
Chapter 10 Chapter 10
T
he creation of something new means loss of the old, while tense immune suppressive transplant regimens. While as yet not
destruction means, for better or worse, a new beginning. delineated, some possible mechanisms and pathways leading to
This duality of existence is an element of Eastern religions tolerance after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation are sug-
and philosophies. For example, Shiva, the Hindu Deity of creation gested in these chapters. Tissue regeneration from blood stem cells
and preservation, is also the God of destruction. The paradox and is also suggested by animal experiments on stem cell plasticity or
complexity of the immune system is that it embodies these same metamoirosis (i.e., change in fate) as described within this text-
attributes. It is the protector and preserver without which human book. Ongoing early clinical trials on tissue regeneration from
life is impossible, as well as in the case of autoimmune disease, the blood stem cells are described in the chapter on stem cell therapy
destroyer of that which it protects. for cardiac and peripheral vascular disease. Whether autologous
Shiva represents contradictions that coexist in conscious re- hematopoietic stem cells, through the process of mobilization and
ality. The many appendages are images for contradictory and var- reinfusion, may be manipulated to contribute to tissue repair in au-
ied functions within one consciousness. The hands hold objects toimmune diseases is a future area for translational research.
representing these attributes, a flame for destruction, the trident Allogeneic stem cell sources include siblings or other related
for creation, and a snake as imagery for mastery over nature. Shiva’s donors, unrelated donors, cord blood, and finally although not yet
duality is sometimes also manifest in gender, pictured not as male in clinical trial, embryonic stem cells. Allogeneic stem cells offer
or female but as a “Half Woman Lord”. So it is with the immune the advantage of changing genetic susceptibility to autoimmune
system, autoimmune diseases more common in women, and tasks disease. In addition they possess the ability of eradicating the au-
that are interrelated with numerous arms and opposing functions. toimmune clones which survive the conditioning regimens, which
Attempts at treating one component invariably affects, not uncom- in these patients are preferably of the nonmyeloablative (NST)
monly in an adverse way, other circuits or components of immune modality. Thus, a Graft-versus-Autoimmunity effect is elicited, as
surveillance. The immune system interacts with nature to hold discussed in the chapters by Marmont and Slavin et al.
mastery over environmental pathogens, destroying or coaxing them Embryonic stem cells are being applied in vitro and in ani-
to live in peaceful coexistence, but other times influenced by patho- mal models to both tolerance and regenerative medicine. In ani-
gens, xenobiotics, gender hormones, or other environmental trig- mal models, embryonic stem cells have been used as an alternate
gers to destroy the host it also protects. marrow donor source resulting in engraftment occurring across
Central tolerance, that is negative selection within the thy- major histocompatibility barriers without graft versus host dis-
mus, eliminates T cells with opposite avidities. T cells expressing ease (Burt et al, unpublished). When working with embryonic stem
either too strong or having no affinity for self-epitopes undergo cells, simultaneous creation, preservation, and destruction are not
apoptotic destruction, while those with mild/moderate affinity for just metaphysical discussions but real issues yet to be resolved by
self-peptides are positively selected. These T cells may in turn me- society.
diate autoimmunity and/or down regulate autoimmune responses Embryonic stem cell lines have been developed from blas-
through regulatory T cells. The process of thymic education that tocysts that were otherwise destined to be destroyed following in
selects for repertoires with mild to moderate self-recognition re- vitro fertilization. In vitro fertilization involves the collection of
sults in an autoimmune duality. Autoimmune cells are physiologic numerous oocytes that are fertilized not within the fallopian tubes
while autoimmune disease is pathologic. Autoimmunity is nor- but rather in a Petri dish containing even more numerous donor
mal, but autoimmune disease is abnormal. Unlike a malignancy, spermatocytes. While numerous blastocysts (pre-implantation
in which a tum or cell is always viewed as pathologic, for autoim- embryos) form, only one will be implanted in the uterus, the oth-
mune disease, treatment must also preserve that which the therapy ers are cryopreserved. When the couple no longer desires children,
is designed to destroy. It is for these reasons that this textbook on what becomes of the remaining blastocysts? Paradoxically, in the
stem cell therapy for autoimmune disease has numerous chapters philosophical spirit of attempting to preserve the life of the un-
devoted to basic immunology. The clinical art of balance in treating born, blastocysts are currently destroyed rather than being allowed
an intertwined and at times contradictory immune system begins to live on as embryonic stem cell lines that contribute to the tissue
with the science of immunology. and existence of another individual. Does the blastocyst have a
Stem cell tra n sp la n ta tio n may be com plicated by soul and if so, is it better to allow its existence to continue in an-
treatment-related mortality and like the immune system that it other individual or to destroy it entirely?
regenerates has equal potential to either create and preserve or Hematopoietic stem cells as a therapeutic tool to induce tol-
destroy. The dual nature that defines stem cells is differentiation erance were first applied to human autoimmune disorders in 1996.
that ultimately leads to death and self-renewal which leads to im- Since then, the door has opened on trials involving numerous au-
mortality. What types of stem cells are there? How are they col- toimmune diseases and allogeneic as well as autologous hemato-
lected? What are their attributes and characteristics? This textbook poietic stem cells. Stem cells are becoming a new therapeutic tool
devotes many chapters to familiarize the reader with the basic sci- to supplement or replace traditional approaches of surgery, phar-
ence, clinical aspects, and new questions being raised in the field macy, and radiotherapy. As the embryonic stem cell-related ethi-
of stem cell biology. Blood stem cells for tolerance and tissue re- cal issues involving creation and destruction are resolved, their
generation are a rapidly developing research and clinical field that clinical application may follow the clinical paths, trails, and trials
is being applied to autoimmune diseases. already being explored with hematopoietic stem cells.
In clinical trials, autologous hematopoietic (blood) stem cells
are being used to reduce the cytopenic interval following in - Richard K B u r t , M .D .
Alberto M . M arm ont , M .D .
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
I
n recent years, data from numerous experimental studies has changed our expectations for the applications of this type of
suggested that the potential uses of stem cells in medicine therapy,9 even though many questions have been raised by these
may reach far beyond bone marrow transplantation. How interesting findings.10 Second, the derivation of totipotent hu-
applicable is recent research to modern medicine, and how soon man stem cells from both embryonic and fetal sources has intro-
might we expect to see stem cells applied to tissue engineering duced a potential new source of tissue for engineering applica-
problems? These and other questions are explored in this intro- tions. Equally important, this new technology marks the genesis
ductory chapter. It is altogether fitting that a discussion of the of a new level of conflict between science and religion that sur-
therapeutic potentials of stem cell therapy be grounded in our passes that raised by older questions of creationism versus evolu-
field, being the first to apply stem cell therapy to the clinical tion. The potential use of stem cells derived from adult tissues
management of acquired and inherited diseases. But what is a introduces yet another side to this complex story. How are we to
stem cell? In the context of bone marrow transplantation, we define when a stem cell is a stem cell? It is in this vein that I
understand the answer to this question in a concrete and func- examine a few of the historical aspects of stem cell biology in
tional sense due to decades of research and clinical applications order to better understand where we have come from at this stage
that grew out of the need to understand the effects of ionizing in the development of the stem cell field.
radiation on biological systems. In the years following the Sec-
ond World War, a considerable am ount of scientific effort was Em bryonic Stem Cells: A T im elin e
focused on the prevention and treatment o f radiation sickness. Lewis11 has correctly identified the origins of the stem cell
From these studies came the observation that transplants of spleen biology field in the work of Leroy Stevens, a developmental bi-
or bone marrow cells contribute to cellular recovery following ologist who identified frequent testicular tumors arising sponta-
lethal radiation.1 Almost 50 years after this dramatic insight, we neously in strain 129 mice at the Jackson Laboratories. This work
now understand that the ability of such transplants to reconsti- was published to little fanfare beginning in 1958.12 However, the
tute hematopoiesis following radiation depends upon the pres- curiosity of Mintz and Illmensee led to a startling observation.
ence of extremely rare stem cells found predominantly in the W hen malignant teratocarcinoma cells were mixed into develop-
bone marrow but capable of mobilization into peripheral tissues ing mouse embryos, the environment of the embryo harnessed
via the blood vascular system.2 the unregulated growth of the tumor and directed these cells to
After many years shrouded in mystery and controversy, the proper channels of proliferation and differentiation.13 The result
characteristics of blood stem cells were gradually revealed through was chimeric mice in which a significant portion of the body
novel assays3'5 and methods for isolation of these rare cells.6,7 We mass was derived from the teratocarcinoma. This startling dis-
now understand that the definition o f a stem cell must include covery was viewed at the time as evidence for environmental regu-
the two essential characteristics of self-renewal (cellular division lation of malignant growth, but the potential of these cells was
maintains stem cell potential) and multipotency (differentiation certainly not overlooked by developmental biologists. Embryonic
into functionally distinct lineages). To complicate matters, it is stem cell lines were derived from the inner cell mass of mouse
clear that progenitor cells, which are m ultipotent but lack blastocysts in 1981,14,15 as shown in Figure 1. These cells were
self-renewal potential, are often difficult to distinguish from true adapted for growth in culture without differentiation, but could
stem cells.8 Finally, at least some confusion persists in the tissue differentiate into mesoderm, endoderm, and ectoderm in vitro
stem cell field, where unipotent precursor cells which maintain a and in vivo. The derivation of embryonic stem cell lines was rap-
tissue through a self-renewing process are often considered stem idly exploited to give birth to the field of targeted mutagenesis,16, 7
cells. an entirely new approach to the investigation of complex mam-
The general field of stem cell biology has been the subject of malian biological systems. Today, it is difficult for scientists to
intense public interest in recent years for several reasons. First, imagine a world in which the genome could not be mutated in a
the demonstration that recipients of bone marrow transplants specific manner. The true power of stem cell biology was revealed
harbor donor-derived cells in a variety of tissues has radically to the world at large with the announcement that the transfer of
Adapted with permission from Bone Marrow Transplantation, VoL 32, Supplement 1, Aug 2003.
Stem Cell Therapyfor Autoimmune Diseasef edited by Richard K. Burt and Alberto M. Marmont. ©2004 Landes Bioscience/Eurekah.com.
2 Stern Ceil Therapy for Autoimmune Disease
Figure 1. From the initial descriptions of the ability of testicular carcinoma cells to produce pluripotent embryonic stem cells, these cells
have since been derived from blastocysts as well as the primordial germ cells in the developing genital ridge in both mouse and man. Figure
courtesy of Terese Winslow, used with permission of the artist.
nuclei derived from adult somatic cells into enucleated oocytes blastocyst-derived embryonic stem cells but lacking apparent tu-
produced, at a low frequency, viable offspring clonally derived morigenic potential. This combination o f multipotential differ-
from the donor o f the nuclei.18 entiation in the absence of tumor formation has lead to the pro-
posed use of these cells in clinical trials to treat spinal cord injury,
M ou se to M an Parkinsons disease, and other cell-based therapies. W ith the specter
The successful application of targeted mutagenesis in the mouse of the cloning of human beings looming before us, the National
was not the only useful application of embryonic stem cell lines. Academy of Sciences initiated a comprehensive analysis of this
A variety of investigators utilized these cell lines to model the brave new world.21 The current state of federal funding will sup-
development of the early embryo in culture systems, and success- port the utilization of fetal-derived embryonic germ cells in clini-
fully recapitulated several aspects of embryogenesis. W hen the cal applications, most likely because the derivation and use of
application of in vitro fertilization to the clinical problem of in- these cells avoids some of the concerns raised by the concept of
fertility resulted in the birth of the first test-tube baby in 1978, frozen embryos as sources of embryonic stem cells. Embryonic
the stage was set for the eventual derivation of human embryonic germ cells are unable to be implanted into a surrogate mother to
stem cells from embryos fertilized in vitro but not implanted into produce a genetically normal human, unlike the embryos formed
a w om b.19 Since these early embryos are frozen in quantities that during in vitro fertalization. As such, the only embryos that might
exceed clinical need, large banks o f fertilized embryos destined be formed by embryonic germ cells would be genetic mosaics of
for destruction now exist around the world as a consequence of the germ cell and a blastocyst in which such cells might be intro-
the widespread application of in vitro fertilization. Some of these duced, or would be the product of somatic cell nuclear transfer.
embryos have been cultured to derive embryonic stem cell lines, Since the latter process can be performed using a wide variety of
however the derivation of cell lines in addition to those already in cell types, the embryonic germ cell provides no special advantage
existence has been deemed unnecessary and will not be supported in this sense.
by federal funding agencies in the United States.
A second approach to the application of stem cell technology A dult Stem C ells
in humans utilizes tissue derived from the genital ridge of aborted Undifferentiated cells that are found in a differentiated adult
first trimester fetuses (Fig. I).20 These cells, which normally de- tissue are considered adult stem cells, particularly when these cells
velop into mature gametes, can be cultured under specific condi- contribute to ongoing tissue maintenance or repair. These cells
tions to produce cell lines with all known characteristics of may be capable of self-renewal, but do not replicate indefinitely
When is a Stem Ceil Really a Stem Cell? 3
in culture. Adult stem cells may differentiate to produce progenitor, Recent advances in vector design have made gene correction a
precursor, and mature cells, but these activities are usually lim- feasible approach to the treatment of a number of genetic diseases,
ited to the cells contained in the tissue o f origin. Adult stem cells including X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency disease,
usually comprise a small minority of the total tissue mass, and as hemophilia, and a number of autoimmune disorders. Clinical
such are usually quite difficult to identify and isolate. Adult stem application o f stem cell therapy depends on robust self-renewal
cells have been described in regenerating tissues such as the liver, and differentiation of the transplanted cells, and in this sense
epithelium and muscle, as well as in tissues like the brain, which trans-differentiation must be sufficiently frequent and robust to
previously was thought not to possess extensive regenerative prop- achieve enough tissue replacement to be clinically useful. How-
erties. By far, the most well-characterized example of adult stem ever, if harnessed and properly regulated, it is not difficult to imag-
cells is that of the hematopoietic system. ine the application of stem cell therapy in diverse settings such as
diabetes (generation of islet cells from stem cells), repair of dam-
H em atop oietic Stem Cells: Paradigms for Stem aged heart muscle, and rebuilding the nervous system after injury
or age-related decline.26
C ell B iology
The limited life-span of most blood cells demands that a con-
tinual source of these cells be assured throughout life. It is likely R egulatory and Funding Issues
for this reason that the hematopoietic system has so readily lent The United States government now provides some funding
itself to applications involving clinical transplantation. Indeed, for human stem cell research. While N IH funds cannot be used
the challenges faced by cells utilized in bone marrow transplanta- for derivation of human ES lines, this type o f research can be
tion are not so different than the normal physiologic role played performed using private sources of funding if proper informed
by these cells during maintenance of hematopoiesis over the life- consent is obtained under a protocol approved by an institutional
time o f the normal mammal. Compared to the hematopoietic review board according to N IH guidelines. N IH funds can be
system, other tissues of the adult mammal display relatively lim- used for research that utilizes existing embryonic stem cell lines,
ited potential for replacement from endogenous stem cells in re- as well as for derivation and use of embryonic germ cells from
sponse to tissue injury. Furthermore, no other tissue is character- fetal tissues. This apparent discrepancy in policy arises due to the
ized by such a wide variety of different cell lineages which all arise consideration that established stem cell lines and aborted fetal
from a common stem cell in a developmental process that con- tissues are not embryos and can not, by themselves, develop into
tinues throughout life. The ability to model many of these differ- human beings. The N IH guidelines and the FDA regulate ex-
entiation pathways under controlled conditions in vitro, and the perimental and clinical use of human pluripotent stem cells and
availability of recombinant proteins that select or direct differen- fetal tissues. As of September 25, 2002, 5 N IH grants have been
tiation along specific lineages makes the hematopoietic system approved and funded for a total of $4.2 million, and administra-
the premier paradigm for the field of stem cell biology. tive supplements for embryonic stem cell research have been
awarded to 30 additional investigators.27
P lasticity
The concept of stem cell plasticity refers to the phenomenon
T h e Future o f Stem C ell T herapy
of trans-differentiation, which is the ability of an adult stem cell A number of challenges remain before the promise of stem
from one tissue to differentiate as a specialized cell type of an- cell therapy can be translated into application. First and fore-
other tissue. A recent study showed that neural stem cells were most, the political and ethical conflicts that surround the use of
capable of regenerating blood lineages in transplant recipients,22 human embryonic and fetal tissue for medical applications must
and the field rapidly advanced as examples of muscle, epithe- be resolved. The concept that stem cells derived from adult tis-
sues will substitute for those obtained from fetal or embryonic
lium, liver, and other tissues derived from heterologous stem cells
sources is simply too premature to be used as a basis for legisla-
(usually bone marrow-derived) were reported.23 W ith few excep-
tion and regulation. While the combination of gene therapy with
tions, these studies involved transplantation of large numbers of
stem cell therapy has proven to be effective for certain diseases,
cells, leaving open the possibility that distinct classes of stem cells
methods of gene delivery must be improved to prevent unpre-
were responsible for regeneration of the different tissues. Fur-
dictable adverse events. Animal models must be refined to allow
thermore, the magnitude of tissue replacement has often been
comprehensive analysis of potential risks and benefits prior to
minor, suggesting that this approach to tissue engineering will
clinical application. These and other barriers stand before us,
require extensive optimization in order to be clinically useful. Fi-
marking the path toward new applications in clinical medicine.
nally, technical artifacts24 and difficulty in reproducing some of
the reported findings25 suggest that caution is indicated in inter-
References
preting many of the experiments. The concept that stem cells
1. Ford CE, Hamerton JL, Barnes DWH et al. Cytological identification
derived from adult tissues will provide a viable alternative to the of radiation-chimaeras. Nature 1956; 177:452-454.
embryo as a source of material for tissue engineering is far from 2. Wright DE, Wagers AJ, Gulati AP et al. Physiological migration o f
validated. h em atopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Science 2001;
294:1933-1936.
3. Till JE, McCulloch EA. A direct measurement o f the radiation
Stem C ells as T herapeutic A gents sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res 1961;
The ability of stem cells to provide a self-renewing source of 14:213-222.
normal differentiated cells has been extensively exploited in the 4. Bradley TR, Metcalf D. The growth o f mouse bone marrow cells in
vitro. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 1966; 44:287-299.
bone marrow transplantation field. Applications include the treat-
5. Thean LE, Hodgson GS, Bertoncello I et al. Characterization of
ment of marrow failure syndromes, leukemia and lymphoma, and megakaryocyte spleen colony-form ing units by response to
certain inherited blood disorders, and autoimmune diseases to 5-fluorouracil and by unit gravity sedimentation. Blood 1983;
which this book is devoted. 62:896-901.
4 Stem Cell Therapy for Autoimmune Disease
6. Visser JWM, Bauman JGJ, Mulder AH et al. Isolation o f murine 18. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J et al. Viable offspring derived
pluripotent hemopoietic stem cells. J Exp Med 1984; 159:1576-1590. from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997; 385:810-813.
7. Spangrude GJ, H eim feld S, Weissman IL. Purification and 19. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS et al. Embryonic stem
characterization o f mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Science 1988; cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998;
241:58-62. 282:1145-1147.
8. Orlic D, Bodine DM . What defines a pluripotent hematopoietic 20. Shamblott MJ, Axelman J, Wang S et al. Derivation o f pluripotent
stem cell (PHSC): Will the real PHSC please stand up! Blood 1994; stem cells from cultured human primordial germ cells. Proc Natl
84:3991-3994. Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:13726-13731.
9. Korbling M, Katz RL, Khanna A et al. Hépatocytes and epithelial 21. Committee on science, engineering, and public policy. Scientific and
cells o f donor origin in recipients of peripheral-blood stem cells. N medical aspects of human reproductive cloning. Washington, DC:
Engl J Med 2002; 346:738-746. National Academy Press, 2002. http://w w w .nap.edu/catalog/
10. Abkowitz JL. Can human hematopoietic stem cells become skin, 10285.html.
gut, or liver cells? N Engl J Med 2002; 346:770-772. 22. Bjornson CR, Rietze RL, Reynolds BA et al. Turning brain into
11. Lewis R. A stem cell legacy: Leroy Stevens. The Scientist 2000; 14:19. blood: A hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neural stem cells in
12. Stevens LC. Studies on transplantable testicular teratomas of strain
vivo. Science 1999; 283:534-537.
129 mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 1958; 20:1257-1270.
23. Anderson DJ, Gage FH, Weissman IL. Can stem cells cross lineage
13. Mintz B, Illmensee K. Normal genetically mosaic mice produced
boundaries? Nature Med 2001; 7:393-395.
from malignant teratocarcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975;
24. Wurmser AE, Gage FH. Stem cells: Cell fusion causes confusion.
72:3585-3589.
14. Evans MJ, Kaufman M H. Establishment in culture o f pluripotential Nature 2002; 416:485-487.
cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981; 292:154-156. 25. Morshead CM, Benveniste P, Iscove N N et al. Hematopoietic
15. Martin GR. Isolation o f a pluripotent cell line from early mouse competence is a rare property o f neural stem cells that may depend
embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem on genetic and epigenetic alterations. Nat Med 2002; 8:268-273.
cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78:7634-7638. 26. Department o f Health and Human Services. Stem cells: Scientific
16. Doetschman T, Gregg RG, Maeda N et al. Targeted correction of a progress and future research directions. National Institutes o f Health
mutant HPRT gene in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 1987; 2001. http://www.nih.gov/news/stemcell/scireport.htm.
330:576-578. 27. Zerhouni E. Stem cell research. Senate Appropriations Subcommittee
17. Thomas KR, Capecchi MR. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene on Labor H H S Education. W ashington, DC: 2002. http ://
targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 1987; 51:503-512. www.nih.gov/about/director/092502sctestimony.htm.
CHAPTER 2 =
Introduction
E
mbryonic stem (ES) cells are pluripotent cells that can be prolonged periods as cells that maintain multipotent potential
maintained indefinitely in culture as undifferentiated cell without evidence of differentiation down a particular develop-
lines, yet retain their ability to form any cell type. The mental lineage. However, in the proper environment or with the
derivation of human embryonic stem cells provides a new model proper stimuli, a stem cell retains the ability to form more spe-
system to learn about human developmental biology. These cells cialized cells such as blood, muscle, liver, or skin. Broadly speak-
may also be a suitable starting point to produce novel cell-based ing, there are two main categories of stem cells: “adult” stem cells
therapies to treat a variety of diseases. This chapter describes the and embryonic stem cells. Adult stem cells are derived from
characteristics of human embryonic cells and the potential of post-natal tissue and are typically thought to have a limited de-
these cells to be used for hematopoietic cell transplantation, tol- velopmental potential. Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) found
erance induction, and treatment of autoimmune diseases. in the bone marrow produce blood cells, neural stem cells (NSCs)
This book, “Stem Cell Therapy for Autoimmune Disease,” found in the central nervous system give rise to neurons and glial
reflects the recently growing interest in stem cells and cell-based cells, hepatic stem cells found in the liver, produce hepatocytes
therapies. Among the various medical specialties, hematologists and biliary cells are all examples of adult stem cells. In contrast,
are probably the most familiar with the concept of stem cells. ES cells are derived from preimplantation blastocysts and have
Many of the diseases seen in the clinical fields of hematology and the potential to form any cell type in the body.
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are clonal in
nature and demonstrate how a defect in a single early precursor Research Prior to D erivation o f H um an ES Cells
cell can lead to a systemic disease. For example, in chronic myel- While the derivation of human ES cells has recently sparked
ogenous leukemia (CML), the transformation of a single hemato- considerable enthusiasm (and some debate) over the potential of
poietic progenitor leads to an overwhelming production of ma- these cells to be used to treat human disease, it is important to
ture and immature hematopoietic cells. If untreated, this “stem recognize that decades of basic scientific research preceded the
cell malignancy” will lead to death of the afflicted individual within isolation and characterization of human ES cells. Studies on mouse
a few years. However, H SCT can cure CML and other hemato- and human embryonal carcinoma (EC) cell lines were a crucial
logical malignancies by replacement of the abnormal clone with precedent to work on ES cells. Differences and similarities be-
normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Additionally, it is also tween human EC cells, murine ES cells, and human ES cells are
possible to treat many nonmalignant hematologic conditions such listed in Table 1. EC cells are multipotent malignant precursor
as congenital immunodeficiencies and sickle cell anemia with cells derived from teratocarcinomas.4 Mouse and human EC cells
HSCT.1,2 The ability to use H SCT to treat severe autoimmune can be isolated from these tumors and be maintained in vitro as
disease (as described in this book) is one of the newest applica- undifferentiated cells. W hen treated with agents to induce differ-
tions o f stem cell biology.3 Indeed, the autoimmune process can entiation (such as retinoic acid) or reimplanted into immunode-
be considered another form of stem cell abnormality. In many of ficient animals, multiple differentiated cell lineages can be de-
these cases, a clone of self-reacting lymphocytes become abnor- rived. EC cells have provided important insights regarding the
mally activated, leading to the destruction of normal cells and
mechanisms of normal mammalian development and abnormal
tissues. Autologous or allogeneic H SCT aims to alleviate this pro-
tumorigenesis. However, the use and interpretation of work on
cess by the elimination or suppression of these rogue lympho-
these cells is limited because EC cells typically have genetic ab-
cytes. As described in this chapter, the derivation of human ES
cells may eventually lead to novel methods of stem cell therapies normalities, and their developmental potential is often restricted
for autoimmune diseases. to a few cell lineages. For these reasons, it became important to
Stem cells are defined as specific cell types that have two im- derive and characterize embryonic stem cells, the normal non-
portant properties: self-renewal and differentiation. Self-renewal malignant counterpart to EC cells. This breakthrough was first
refers to the ability of these cells to undergo cell division for reported by two groups in 1981.5,6
Stem Cell Therapyfor Autoimmune Disease, edited by Richard K. Burt and Alberto M. Marmont. ©2004 Landes Bioscience/Eurekah.com.
6 Stem Ceil Therapy for Autoimmune Disease
Abbreviations: ES= embryonic stem; EC= embryonal carcinoma; LIF= leukemia inhibitory factor; MEF= mouse embryonic fibroblast;
SSEA= stage specific embryonal antigens; TRA= transcription factor.
Mouse ES cells are typically derived from the inner cell mass tion to delete specific genes within ES cells. For example, dele-
(ICM) o f early preimplantation stage blastocysts. This preim- tion of the genes for the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
plantation stage of development occurs after fertilization of the receptors flk-1 and fit-1 leads to death at approximately day 9 of
oocyte and before attachment to the uterus. During this time, mouse embryogenesis. Analysis of these mice demonstrates lack
the zygote undergoes several rounds of cell division. The cells of normal hematopoietic and endothelial cell development and
produced at this early stage are not committed to become any leads to the presumption that these receptors (and VEGF) are
particular part o f the body. Indeed, it is possible to split the de- required for normal hematopoiesis.13,14 These results correspond
veloping embryo in half at this stage, and each half has the ability to other studies that find flk-1 is expressed on HSCs.15
to develop normally. The first cell differentiation is evident after While research on mouse ES cells has been fruitful to eluci-
5-6 days of development with the appearance of the outer cell date mechanisms of mammalian development, mouse and hu-
mass (trophectoderm) and the inner cell mass (ICM) (Fig. 1). man embryogenesis are distinctly different. For example, the rela-
The trophectoderm develops into the outer layers of the placenta; tive size and structure of the placenta and other fetal structures
whereas the ICM , a small cluster o f about a dozen cells, will even- are quite dissimilar.16 These discrepancies lead to the very likely
tually derive all the cells o f the fetal and adult body, and some possibility that mouse ES cells may not always closely model nor-
extraembryonic structures. ES cells are derived by careful isola- mal human developmental biology. Indeed, the yolk sac, an im-
tion of the ICM and culturing these cells under conditions that portant organ of early hematopoiesis, is quite different between
permit them to divide without undergoing differentiation down mouse and m an.17 Therefore, it is valuable to produce a model
specific developmental lineages. Under proper conditions, ES cells system that more closely resembles human development. Toward
can be maintained for months or years as undifferentiated cells this goal, our group (Thomson) derived ES cells from nonhu-
without evidence o f senescence. ES cells naturally express high man primates: rhesus monkeys and common marmosets.18,19 Im-
levels of telomerase and maintain a normal karyotype (unlike EC portantly, the earliest stages of embryogenesis is very analogous
cells).7 However, under specific conditions, the ES cells can be between humans and nonhuman primates.16
induced to differentiate into specific cell types of interest. This
potential is best demonstrated by inducing mouse ES cells to form Characteristics o f Human ES Cells
chimeras with an intact embryo. Careful analysis and breeding of Using lessons learned from derivation of nonhuman primate
the resulting chimeras show that all cells within an adult organ- ES cells, it became feasible to generate ES cells from human pre-
ism can be formed from a single ES cell.8 implantation blastocysts. W ith informed consent and protocols
Work with mouse ES cells has unraveled some of the basics of approved by the local institutional review board, fertilized oo-
mammalian developmental biology and genetics. Not surprisingly, cytes no longer desired by couples undergoing in vitro fertiliza-
research using mouse ES cells has been particularly amenable to tion (and destined to be discarded) were donated to this research
defining mechanisms o f hematopoietic development. Work by endeavor. The technique used to derive human ES cells was simi-
many groups has demonstrated that mouse ES cells can be in- lar to that used for nonhuman primate ES cells. The oocytes were
duced to differentiate into hematopoietic lineages in vitro.9 Intri- cultured to blastocyst stage and immunosurgery used to isolate
cate time-course experiments show the regulation of specific genes the ICM, which is cultured on mitotically-inactivated mouse em-
during specific developmental stages.10,11 O ther studies carefully bryonic fibroblast feeder cells. The ICM-derived cells divided and
alter external stimuli (cytokines, adhesion molecules) to deter- were serial passed without evidence of differentiation— thereby
mine how these factors affect hematopoiesis.12 Perhaps the most established into lines of human ES cells. The multipotent nature
precise experiments have used genetic homologous recombina- of these cells was initially demonstrated by intramuscular injec-
Embryonic Stem Cells: Unique Potential to Treat Autoimmune Diseases 7
• Immunosuppressive medications
• HLA-defined ES cell "banks"
• Deletion/insertion of HLA genes
• Insertion of genes for immune-modifying proteins
• Deletion of genes for co-stimulatory immune response
proteins
• Nuclear reprogramming to produce HLA-matched ES cells
• Hematopoietic chimerism
with transplantation of a kidney from the same donor. Initial 5. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential
reports of these studies are promising.50 cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981; 292:154-156.
6. Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse
This potential to use human ES cell-derived HSCs to induce embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem
hematopoietic chimerism and tolerance has particular relevance cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1981; 78:7634-7638.
to treatment of autoimmune disease. One of the major goals of 7. Smith A. Embryonic stem cells. In: Marshak DR, Gardner R,
human ES cell-based research is to develop replacement cells that Gottlieb D, eds. Stem cell biology Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold
can be transplanted to replace diseased or damaged tissues. There- Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001:205-230.
8. Nagy A, Rossant J, Nagy R et al. Derivation o f completely cell culture
fore, devising methods to induce human ES cells to produce pan-
derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad
creatic islet cells to treat diabetics or oligodendrocytes to benefit Sci USA 1993; 90:8424-8428.
patients with multiple sclerosis seems quite promising. However, 9. Keller GM. In vitro differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Curr
immune mechanisms o f graft rejection and autoimmunity again Opin Cell Biol 1995; 7:862-869.
become a potentially significant impediment to this type of cel- 10. Keller G, Kennedy M, Papayannopoulou T et al. Hematopoietic
lular therapy. If the ES cell-derived cells (beta cells for example) commitment during embryonic stem cell differentiation in culture.
are not HLA-matched to the host, these cells will likely be re- Mol Cell Biol 1993; 13:473-486.
11. Robertson SM, Kennedy M, Shannon JM et al. A transitional stage
jected if immunosuppressive drugs are not used. O f course drugs in the commitment o f mesoderm to hematopoiesis requiring the
such as cyclosporin, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids have signifi- transcription factor scl/tal-1. Development 2000; 127:2447-2459.
cant complications such as infections, renal failure, diabetes, and 12. Nishikawa SI, Nishikawa S, Hirashima M et al. Progressive lineage
lymphoproliférative disorders. However, the unique characteris- analysis by cell sorting and culture identifies flkl+ve-cadherin+ cells
tics of ES cells may allow methods to permit transplantation of at a diverging point of endothelial and hemopoietic lineages.
these cells without need for immunosuppressive medications.26,45 Development 1998; 125:1747-1757.
13. Shalaby F, Rossant J, Yamaguchi TP et al. Failure o f blood-island
For example, genetic recombination may be used to delete or
formation and vasculogenesis in flk-1-deficient mice. Nature 1995;
substitute HLA genes within the ES cells. In this manner, the 376:62-66.
engineered cells would not be regarded as foreign to the host. 14. Fong GH, Rossant J, Gertsenstein M et al. Role of the fit-1 receptor
Derviation of ES cells from the products of nuclear reprogram- tyrosine kinase in regulating the assembly of vascular endothelium.
ming may one day also be able to accomplish this feat.51 How- Nature 1995; 376:66-70.
ever, even if these perfect HLA-matched cells can be produced, 15. Ziegler BL, Valtieri M, Porada GA et al. KDR receptor: A key marker
the underlying autoimmune process may continue to pose a prob- defining hematopoietic stem cells. Science 1999; 285:1553-1558.
16. Thomson JA, Marshall VS. Primate embryonic stem cells. Curr Top
lem. Indeed, one would fully expect that without immunosup-
Dev Biol 1998; 38:133-165.
pression, transplantation of perfect HLA-matched pancreatic is- 17. Palis J, Yoder MC. Yolk-sac hematopoiesis: The first blood cells of
let cells would be recognized and destroyed by the same clone of mouse and man. Exp Hematol 2001; 29:927-936.
autoimmune lymphocytes that produced the type 1 diabetes in 18. Thomson JA, Kalishman J, Golos TG et al. Isolation of a primate
the first place. This has been unfortunately seen in diabetic pa- embryonic stem cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;
tients who receive a pancreas transplant from an identical twin.52 92:7844-7848.
However, as described above, the plasticity of the ES cells may be 19. Thomson JA, Kalishman J, Golos TG et al. Pluripotent cell lines
derived from common marmoset (callithrix jacchus) blastocysts. Biol
used to create both HSCs and a second cell type of interest, such
Reprod 1996; 55:254-259.
as a pancreatic beta cell. Cotransplantation of the two cell types 20. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS et al. Embryonic stem
derived from the same parental ES cell should permit tolerance cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998;
to the new pancreatic cells due to the production of tolerant 282:1145-1147.
lymphoctyes from the HLA-matched ES cell-derived HSCs. 21. Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Fong CY et al. Embryonic stem cell lines
Finally, basic studies o f immune system development using from human blastocysts: Somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat
human ES cells should lead to better understanding of the mecha- Biotechnology 2000; 18:399-404.
22. NIH human embryonic stem cell registry. 2001. http://escr.nih.gov/
nisms of immunologic education and tolerance. Derivation of 23. Amit M, Carpenter MK, Inokuma MS et al. Clonally derived human
lymphocytes from ES cells will lead to a population of cells that embryonic stem cell lines maintain pluripotency and proliferative
are immunlogically naive. Altering the conditions of the growth potential for prolonged periods of in vitro culture. Dev Biology 2000;
of these cells (for example, exposure to thymic tissue) may permit 227:271-278.
dissection o f the stimuli that induce tolerance or reactivity to par- 24. Nichols J, Chambers I, Taga T et al. Physiological rationale for
ticular antigens. Using this system to evaluate basic immune responsiveness of mouse embryonic stem cells to gpl30 cytokines.
mechanisms may eventually lead to understanding the initiation Development 2001; 128:2333-2339.
25. Xu C, Inokuma MS, Denham J et al. Feeder-free growth o f
of the autoimmune process and new measures to alleviate these
undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2001;
diseases.
19:971-974.
26. Odorico JA, Kaufman DS, Thomson JA. Multilineage differentiation
References from human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells 2001; 19:193-204.
1. Buckley RFI, Schiff SE, Schiff RI et al. Hematopoietic stem-cell 27. Kaufman DS, Lewis RL, H anson ET et al. H em atopoietic
transplantation for the treatm ent o f severe com bined colony-forming cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. Proc
immunodeficiency N Engl J Med 1999; 340:508-516. Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:10716-10721.
2. Walters MC, Storb R, Patience M et al. Impact of bone marrow 28. Zhang S-C, Wernig M, Duncan ID et al. In vitro differentiation of
transplantation for symptomatic sickle cell disease: An interim report. transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells.
Multicenter investigation of bone marrow transplantation for sickle Nat Biotechnology 2001; 19:1129-1133.
cell disease. Blood 2000; 95:1918-1924. 29. Reubinoff BE, Itsykson P, Turetsky T et al. Neural progenitors from
3. Burt RK, Traynor AE. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19:1134-1140.
new therapy for autoimmune disease. Stem Cells 1999; 17:366-372. 30. Assady S, Maor G, Amit M et al. Insulin production by human
4. Andrews PW, Przyborski SA, Thomson JA. Embryonal carcinoma
embryonic stem cells. Diabetes 2001; 50:1691-1697.
cells as embryonic stem cells. In: Marshak DR, Gardner R, Gottlieb
D, eds. Stem cell biology. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001:231-265.
10 Stem Ceil Therapy for Autoimmune Disease
31. Kehat I, Kenyagin-Karsenti D, Snir M et al. Human embryonic 42. Lundell BI, Mandalam RK, Smith AK. Clinical scale expansion of
stem cells can differentiate into myocytes with structural and cryopreserved small volume whole bone marrow aspirates produces
functional properties o f cardiomyocytes. J Clin Invest 2001; sufficient cells for clinical use. J Hematother 1999; 8:115-127.
108:407-414. 43. Emerson SG. Ex vivo expansion o f hematopoietic precursors,
32. Lebkowski JS, Gold JD, Chiu C-P et al. Differentiation of human progenitors, and stem cells: The next generation o f cellular
embryonic stem cells into hépatocytes, cardiomyocytes, and neurons: therapeutics. Blood 1996; 87:3082-3088.
Transplantation applications. Blood 2001; 98:348a. 44. McSweeney PA, Niederwieser D , Shizuru JA et al. Hematopoietic
33. Kim HJ, Tisdale JF, Wu T et al. Many multipotential gene-marked cell transplantation in older patients with hematologic malignancies:
progenitor or stem cell clones contribute to hematopoiesis in Replacing high-dose cytotoxic therapy with graft-versus-tumor effects.
nonhuman primates. Blood 2000; 96:1-8. Blood 2001; 97:3390-3400.
34. Oudshoorn M, Cornelissen JJ, Fibbe WE et al. Problems and possible 45. Kaufman DS, Odorico JS, Thomson JA. Transplantation therapies
solutions in finding an unrelated bone marrow donor. Results o f from human embryonic stem cells- circumventing immune rejection,
consecutive searches for 240 Dutch patients. Bone Marrow Transplant e-biomed: J Regenerative Medw 2000; 1:11-15.
1997; 20:1011-1017. 46. Dey B, Sykes M, Spitzer TR. Outcomes of recipients of both bone
35. Howe CWS, Radde-Stepanick T. Hematopoietic cell donor registries. marrow and solid organ transplants. A Review Medicine (Baltimore)
In: Thomas ED, Blume KG, Forman SJ, eds. Hematopoietic cell 1998; 77:355-369.
transplantation. Malden, MA: Blackwell Sciences, 1999:2:503-512. 47. Gandy KL, Weissman IL. Tolerance of allogeneic heart grafts in mice
36. Patients proceeding to stem cell transplant: National Marrow Donor simultaneously reconstituted with purified allogeneic hematopoietic
Program 2 0 0 1 . http://w w w .m arrow .org/N M D P /SL ID E SE T / stem cells. Transplantation 1998; 65:295-304.
sld025.htm. 48. Shizuru JA, Weissman IL, Kernoff R et al. Purified hematopoietic
37. Silver RT, W oolf SH, Hehlmann R et al. An evidence-based analysis stem cell grafts induce tolerance to alloantigens and can mediate
of the effect of busulfan, hydroxyurea, interferon, and allogeneic bone positive and negative t cell selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;
marrow transplantation in treating the chronic phase o f chronic 97:9555-9560.
m yeloid leukemia: Developed for the American Society o f 49. Wekerle T, Sykes M. Mixed chimerism as an approach for the
Hematology. Blood 1999; 94:1517-1536. induction o f transplantation tolerance. Transplantation 1999;
38. Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Blume KG. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell
68:459-467.
transplanation for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. In:
50. Spitzer TR, Delm onico F, Tolkoff-Rubin N et al. Combined
Thomas ED, Blume KG, Forman SJ, eds. Hematopoietic Cell
histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-matched donor bone marrow
Transplantation. Malden, MA: Blackwell Sciences, 1999:2:823-834.
39. Laughlin MJ, Barker J, Bambach B et al. Hematopoietic engraftment and renal transplantation for multiple myeloma with end stage renal
and survival in adult recipients o f umbilical-cord blood from disease: The induction o f allograft tolerance through mixed
unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1815-1822. lymphohematopoietic chimerism. Transplantation 1999; 68:480-484.
40. Gluckman E, Rocha V, Boyer-Chammard A et al. Outcome of 51. Lanza RP, Cibelli JB, West M D. Prospects for the use o f nuclear
cord-blood transplantation from related and unrelated donors. transfer in human transplantation. Nat B iotechnol 1999;
Eurocord Transplant Group and the European Blood and Marrow 17:1171-1174.
Transplantation Group. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:373-381. 52. Sutherland DE, Goetz FC, Sibley RK. Recurrence o f disease in
41. Lum LG, LeFever AV, Treisman JS et al. Immune modulation in pancreas transplants. Diabetes 1989; 38:85-87.
cancer patients after adoptive transfer o f a n ti-C D 3 /
anti-CD28-costimulated t cells-phase I clinical trial. J Immunother
2001; 24:408-419.
CHAPTER 3
Introduction
T
he adult vertebrate central nervous system (CNS) consists which contacts and repeatedly envelopes a stretch of axon with
of four major differentiated cell types: neurons, astrocytes, subsequent condensation of its spiraling plasma membrane. This
oligodendrocytes and ependymal cells. Historically, there myelination of axons imparts insulating properties that allow the
has been disagreement on how these differentiated cell rapid propagation of action potentials throughout the CNS with-
types
are generated in the CNS. Progress remains hindered by the out continuous regeneration of the action potential along each
complexity of cell structure in this system, the lack of specific segment of an axon.
cell surface markers to identify distinct cell types and the presence
o f numerous transit amplifying cell populations that rapidly O rigin o f Neural and G lial Progenitors
generate early progenitors. At present it is clear that some cells, in the C N S
termed neural stem cells, can generate neurons as well as astrocytes
All cells comprising the CNS are originally derived from the
and oligodendrocytes of the glial lineage both in vitro and in
early neuroepithelium that forms as the neural plate along the
vivo. However, controversy still exists over whether the majority
midline of the developing embryo. As development proceeds, this
of glia in the CNS are generated by multipotential stem cells or
single layer of pseudostratified epithelium folds to form the neu-
progenitor cells that were born as committed glioblasts. Neverthe-
ral tube (Fig. 1). The differentiation of the neuroepithelial stem
less, the existence of stem cells in the CNS has important impli-
cells into neurons and glia then proceeds in a temporal specific
cations for understanding both the mechanisms that generate
manner that is specific for each region of the developing neural
neural diversity during embryonic development and the recruitment
tu b e.4,5 G enerally neurogenesis occurs first, followed by
and differentiation o f neural stem cells present in the adult. This
gliogenesis. This patterning of the neural tube is thought to be-
review summarizes our knowledge of stem cells that comprise
gin at the neural plate stage of development through inductive
the CNS and examines the broad plasticity reported for adult
interactions that create organizing centers at the dorsal and ven-
CNS stem cell populations.
tral poles.6'8 These specialized neuroepithelial cells generate sig-
nals that induce, often in a concentration dependent manner, the
Interdependence o f N eurons and G lia expression of patterning genes in adjacent neuroepithelial cells.
in the C N S These patterning genes generally encode homeodomain transcrip-
Glial cells constitute the majority of the cells in the CNS. These tion factors, and their expression patterns divide the cells in the
cells provide the structural scaffolding that is important for mi- neuroepithelium into different domains along the rostral-caudal
gration of early neuroblasts, are a major source of adhesion mol- and dorso-ventral axes of the neural tube.9,16 These patterning
ecules that participate in the formation of neural networks, form genes are thought to specify neuronal subtype identity and con-
limiting membranes that separate the CNS from other tissues trol the duration of specific types of neurogenesis occurring in
and aid in the rapid conduction of electrical impulses down axons the brain and spinal cord during each developmental stage.
of mature neurons. There is now growing recognition that glia, The exact mechanisms underlying the developmental changes
possibly through their immense glial networks, may possess com- in the stem cell and precursor population in any given region of
munication skills that complement those of neurons themselves.1,2 the neural tube are not understood. However, by midgestation in
Astroglia are stellate, branched supporting cells that contact the the developing cortex of the brain, for example, young neurons
soma, dendrites and axons of neurons, the soma and processes of have migrated beyond the germinal ventricular zone (VZ) of the
oligodendrocytes and associate intricately with other astrocytes. neuroepithelium with the aid of newly formed glial cells in this
Their close association with the surface of various neurons is region (Fig. 2). These radial glia contact the inner ventricular
thought to mediate the exchange of substances between these two surface and the outer pial surface of the neural tube, guiding neu-
cell types.3Their multiple processes also contact, induce and main- ronal migration away from the VZ and forming the second ger-
tain the tight junctions in endothelial cells that effectively form minal zone, the subventricular zone (SVZ). W hen early neuro-
the blood-brain barrier. Oligodendroglia, also a supporting glial blast formation has ceased, the neuroepithelial stem cells begin to
cell type present in the CNS, extend many processes, each of differentiate into glioblasts. Clonal studies suggest that most glia
Stem Cell Therapy for Autoimmune Disease, edited by Richard K. Burt and Alberto M. Marmont. ©2004 Landes Bioscience/Eurekah.com.
12 Stem Cell Therapy for Autoimmune Disease
Figure 1. Early development of the central nervous system (CNS). Cross-section through the head anlage of a developing chick embryo:
Initially, cells forming the neural plate lie on both sides of the primitive streak. As the primitive streak migrates caudally, the mesoderm
invaginates, and the neural plate forms the neural groove in the midline of the embryo. Changes in cell shape cause the neural groove to
expand upward and fold inward to form the neural tube. Cells lining the neural tube are the early neuroepithelial stem cells.
originate from stem cells in the neuroepithelium.11 These cells cells isolated from the spinal cord generate spinal cord progeny.19
migrate out into the adjacent SVZ where they proliferate and Stem cells isolated from the basal forebrain generate more GABA
become astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. Lineage tracing studies containing neurons than stem cells derived from dorsal regions.20
using stereotactically injected retrovirus support the view that the
majority of progenitors within this germinal matrix are glial pre- A d ult Neural Stem C ells
cursors that generate either astrocytes or oligodendrocytes. 2,13 Proliferative stem cell compartments are not exclusive to the
Some SVZ cells give rise to both oligodendrocytes and astrocytes, developing CNS. However, after embryonic development, the
and a rare cell will develop into both neurons and glia,14 athough exact characteristics of the neural stem cell in the CNS have re-
this remains a controversial issue.15 mained elusive and controversial. Numerous pioneering experi-
W hen glioblast formation ceases shortly after birth, the ger- ments have demonstrated that specific regions of the mammalian
minal VZ disappears throughout the neuroaxis and many of the CNS undergo a moderate, yet continuous level of neurogenesis
remaining neuroepithelial cells become ependymal cells. The postnatally and throughout adult life21'24 (Fig. 3). To date,
ependymal cells persist throughout adulthood lining the luminal neurogenesis in the adult mammalian CNS is known to utilize at
surface of the ventricular system of the brain and the central ca- least one dividing progenitor cell population25 and two different
nal of the spinal cord. These cells possess multiple cilia on their multipotent stem cell populations.2 28 The putative progenitor
apical surface that effectively move the cerebral spinal fluid cell population resides in the subgranular zone of the dentate gy-
throughout these regions. Similarly, the SVZ, decreases in size rus located in the hippocampus, the region of the brain involved
and persists immediately adjacent to the ependymal cell layer in learning and memory. The two remaining stem cell popula-
throughout most of the ventricular regions o f the brain. How- tions have been reported to exist in and near the anterior lateral
ever, a SVZ region is not present in the developing or mature ventricular wall of the cerebral cortex, both of which exist in the
regions of the spinal cord. adult as highly differentiated glial cell types; SVZ astrocytes and
As compartmentalization of the CNS becomes apparent, neu- ventricular ependymal cells. While there is only a limited amount
ral stem cells in the early mammalian CNS are considered to be of neurogenesis that occurs in the adult hippocampus, stem cells
concentrated in seven major areas: the olfactory bulb, VZ and located in the SVZ are thought to continuously replace interneu-
SVZ of the forebrain; the hippocampus, cerebellum, cerebral cor- rons in the olfactory bulb. It remains controversial whether the
tex and the spinal cord. Their number and pattern of develop- rapidly dividing multipotent stem cells in the SVZ are a distinct
ment vary in different species.4,16,17 However, once the pattern- stem cell population that contributes to the generation o f olfac-
ing of the different CNS compartments is in place, it is believed tory interneurons. It has been suggested that the adjacent ependy-
that stem cells located in these different regions of the developing mal cell layer, which has been shown to divide at a comparatively
CNS are develop mentally distinct and are not a single popula- slower rate in vivo, may give rise to the SVZ cells.26,29 Although
tion of stem cells that are dispersed over multiple sites.18 Stem glial cells in the SVZ are derived from the VZ during early
Neural Stem Cells and Oligodendrocyte Progenitors in the Central Nervous System 13
Figure 2. Early differentiation of the neuroepithelium in the neocortex of the brain. Early in development, neuroepithelial stem cells reside
in the luminal cellular layer of the neural tube in an area generally termed the ventricular zone (VZ). These cells begin to divide rapidly,
initially generating radial glia and early restricted neuroblasts. The neuroblasts exit from the cell cycle, delaminate from the neuroepithelium,
accumulate within the ventricular zone and activate a number of genes indicative of generic neuronal differentiation. Activation of these
genes is thought to put into motion the expression of specific cascades of factors that specify both neuronal determination and differentiation
in different regions of the cortex. As the neuroblasts mature, radial glia provide a primary substrate for the migration of post-mitotic neurons
from the germinal ventricular zone to the emerging layers of the neocortex. After neuroblast formation subsides, neuroepithelial stem cells
in the ventricular zone generate glioblasts. These glioblasts migrate out into the adjacent subventricular zone (SVZ) where they proliferate
and become primarily astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. These cells then migrate away from this region to populate other regions of the
developing cortex.
embryonic development, a lineage relationship between these two promote the production or activity of proneural transcription
multipotent adult cell types has not been firmly established. How- factors. Similarly, they can differentiate into glia in response to a
ever, the location of these two adult neural stem cell populations variety of extracellular signals such as ciliary neurotrophic factor
has some surprising parallels to early neurogenic development of (CN TF), bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), transforming
the ventricular regions in the embryonic brain. The ependymal growth factor-a (TG Fa), and neuregulin-1 (Nrg-1)/ glial growth
cells, within the lateral ventricular wall, occupy a position analo- factor-2 (GGF2). However it is not known whether these same
gous to the embryonic VZ cells and are thought to be derived factors directly induce glial differentiation in vivo. Because envi-
directly from a subset of embryonic VZ cells. W hile the ependy- ronmental conditions can be provided in vitro by adding specific
mal cells are highly differentiated glial cells that line the luminal trophic factors to the culture medium, neural stem cells differen-
surface of the adult ventricular system, these seemingly differen- tiating in cultures have been shown to exhibit considerable plas-
tiated cells express several proteins expressed by neural stem cells ticity not normally observed in vivo. Thus, understanding the
during normal development including nestin, musashi, and Notch environmental conditions necessary to promote specific types of
1 receptors. differentiation from a stem cell may show that the limitations
While the identification and existence of adult neural stem that these cells perceive in vivo are controlled by environmental
cells in the ventricular and SVZ was a surprising finding, even cues and not necessarily by intrinsic commitment of the stem cell
more surprising is the suggestion that they are highly differenti- itself.
ated glial cell types and not remnants of nascent undifferentiated
stem cells that are specified early during embryonic development. O ligodendroglial Progenitors
Numerous trophic factors have been shown to influence the ac- The multipotent neural stem cells or early neural progenitor
tual developmental fate of a progenitor or multipotent stem cell cells present in the central nervous system of embryonic, neona-
from these regions, which may differ from its developmental po- tal and adult animals can also differentiate into intriguing
tential.30,31 In culture, cells from these regions can differentiate lineage-restricted progenitors termed oligodendroglial progenitors.
into neurons in response to instructive extracellular signals that Most oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the developing central
14 Stem Ceil Therapy for Autoimmune Disease
Figure 3. Neurogenic regions of the mammalian CNS. Neural stem cells in the adult CNS have been identified in four different regions:
the ependymal cell layer lining the lateral ventricular regions of the brain, the adjacent subventricular zone, the hippocampus and the spinal
cord. The ventricular system of the brain is continuous with the central canal of the spinal cord (A). Coronal sections through different
regions of the brain show the location of the hippocampus near the posterior region of the cerebral hemispheres (B). The ependymal cell
layer lining the luminal surface of the lateral ventricles and the adjacent subventricular zone is shown in C.
nervous system terminally differentiate into oligodendrocytes that progenitors to differentiate into oligodendrocytes is intrinsic to
myelinate axons. Terminally differentiated oligodendrocytes do the lineage.36 However, co-culture with neurons increases myelin
not divide, dedifferentiate, or reenter the cell cycle. However, pre- gene expression, such as PLP, MBP and MAG.
cursors to oligodendrocytes do exist and their division persists,
albeit at a slow rate, throughout life, with a certain potentiality P lasticity o f the O ligodendrocyte Lineage
bias for myelin repair. Recently, mouse oligodendroglial progenitors derived from
Oligodendrocyte progenitors have been characterized in ro- to tip o ten t em bryonic stem cells were transplanted into a
dent species by their bipolar morphology and by the presence of myelin-deficient rat model.37 These cells were able to interact
specific markers. In vitro studies as well as in vivo experiments with the host neurons and efficiently myelinate axons in the brain
have shown that these cells are actively proliferating and posses and spinal cord. Similarly, oligodendrocyte progenitors have been
migratory properties. Oligodendrocyte progenitors arise from isolated from the adult brain. These cells have been propagated
m ultip o ten tial cells in spatially restricted germ inal zones extensively in vitro as neurospheres— clonal spheroid cell aggre-
thoughout the brain and spinal cord. These progenitors migrate gates that detach from the tissue culture dish and grow in suspen-
long distances away from these zones in the CNS before they sion 21— to generate a large number of multipotent stem cell prog-
settle along fiber tracts o f the future white matter and then trans- eny that maintain their myelinating potential.38 Phenotypic
form into preoligodendrocytes. The pre-oligodendrocyte is a characterization of these cells has indicated that these oligoden-
multiprocessed, post-migratory cell that retains the ability to di- drocyte progenitors resemble neonatal rather than adult progeni-
vide but is not responsive to the mitogen, platelet-derived growth tors. The ability to generate such cells from both embryonic stem
factor (PDGF).32-34 These cells can be identified by their acquisi- cells and the adult brain opens many possibilities to explore the
tion of the marker, 0 4 .35 The preoligodendrocyte can further potential of these cells for repairing myelin disorders. Moreover,
differentiate into an immature oligodendrocyte, characterized in the ability of the adult-derived oligodendrocyte progenitors to
the rat by the appearance o f the marker GalC, and the loss of apparently dedifferentiate to a more primative state, suggests that
expression of GD3 and A2B5 antigens on the cell surface. CNP these cells may also represent a unique progenitor cell population
(2’,3’-cyclic nucleotide 3’-phosphodiesterase), the earliest known that may be permissive to manipulation both in vitro and in vivo.
myelin-specific protein to be synthesized by developing oligo-
dendrocytes also appears at this time. Are Neural Stem C ells D erived from the A dult
The mature oligodendrocyte is characterized by the expression C N S Irreversibly D eterm ined?
of myelin basic protein (MBP), myelin associated-glycoprotein Adult spinal-cord-derived cells, which normally generate only
(MAG) and myelin proteolipid protein (PLP). In vitro analyses glia4,26 can make interneurons if injected into the adult hippoc-
suggest that maturation of oligodendrocytes from the precursor stage ampus.39 Similarly, adult hippocampal-derived stem cells can make
to the mature cell is identical in culture, even in the absence of olfactory interneurons after transplantation into the SVZ.40
neurons, as in intact tissue. Thus the capacity of oligodendrocyte However, the ability of adult-derived cells to produce complex
Neural Stem Celts and Oligodendrocyte Progenitors in the Central Nervous System 15
projection neurons that span long distances in the mature CNS, differentiation of these cells to myocytes, a process which required
has not been demonstrated. direct contact between the neural stem cell and the muscle cells.47
Only recently have people investigating the differentiation A conceptually different approach has also demonstrated the
potential of adult neural stem cells discovered that their differen- myogenic differentiation potential of neural stem cells.48 This ap-
tiation repertoire extends well beyond the boundaries of the cell proach took advantage of the large number of inductive signals
types identified in the CNS. This revelation has caused quite a present in embryonic stem cells undergoing differentiation in vitro,
stir among traditional developmental biologists and many valid a process that ultimately results in the differentiation of the ES
arguments have been raised and remain to be answered.20,41 If cells to various cell lineages. In order to expose neural stem cells
this newly discovered potentiality is true, it may cause us to to such a milieu, the cells were cultured in close proximity to
re-evaluate or define the methods that are used to determine differentiating embryoid bodies. In these experiments, differen-
whether a neural stem cell is truly irreversibly specified or not. It tiated neural stem cells gave rise primarily to myocytes, identified
is possible that embryonic or adult neural stem cells, when cul- by the expression o f the markers desmin and myosin heavy chain,
tured in vitro, exhibit a renewed potentiality that has not been and exhibited morphological features such as syncytium formation.
tested or observed in direct transplantation assays. This renewed Two separate methods have been used to simultaneously dem-
potential may involve complex inter- and intracellular mecha- onstrate the broad differentiation potential of neural stem cells.48
nisms that may have been unwittingly imparted to these cells in These experiments have relied heavily on the abundance of fac-
culture. Alternatively, the need to restrict the potential of a stem tors present in the early embryonic environment to demonstrate
cell may decrease as an organism matures.42 Thus, during embry- such potential. In a separate set of experiments, adult neural stem
onic development, cells may be exposed to overlapping sets of cells were injected into early developing chick or mouse embryos.
extracellular signals. This may initially necessitate their use of In the developing chick, neurospheres or clusters o f
cell-autonomous mechanisms to restrict their differentiation. clonally-derived neural stem cells were placed directly on or near
Therefore, transplanting restricted cells from one location to an- the primitive streak of a gastrulating embryo. This allowed the
other does not affect their differentiation potential. However, once neural stem cells to integrate into the epiblast, move with the
an organism matures, stem cells in different tissues may be spa- primitive ectoderm cells through the primitive streak during gas-
tially segregated into specific niches where they no longer actively trulation and be distributed throughout the three definitive germ
encounter signals that restrict their differentiation potential. These layers. In the mouse, dissociated neural stem cells, or small
cells may be released from their cell autonomous programs making neurospheres, were aggregated with morulae or injected into blas-
them more responsive to environmental cues that can influence tocysts. In both of these early embryo models, neural stem cell
their differentiation. progeny were found in numerous tissues of the host, in environ-
ments that inevitably had exposed them to a large number of
D ifferentiation to H em atopoietic C ells different inductive signals. The neural stem cells integrated in a
Intriguingly, in the past few years several reports have indi- mosaic pattern into many tissues and were morphologically in-
cated that both hematopoietic and neural stem cells both dem- distinguishable from neighboring host cells. Contributions to tis-
onstrate surprising plasticity.43 Bone marrow derived cells have sues were large and occasionally comprised as much as 30% of
been shown to generate cells expressing neuronal markers in the the entire organ. Cell type specific antibodies were used to verify
brain.44,45 Similarly, embryonic or adult-derived neural stem cells whether the neural stem cell derived cells had remained neural or
from the brain, when injected intravenously into sublethally irra- if they had taken on a phenotype appropriate for the tissue into
diated mice, have been shown to generate hematopoietic deriva- which they had integrated. In both the chick and mouse assays,
tives.46 In this study, in vitro clonogenic assays, immunocytochem- neural stem cell progeny had indeed differentiated to many em-
istry and flow ctyometric analysis were used to test whether these bryonic cell types including hépatocytes, cardiomyocytes and
cells had adopted a hematopoietic identity. In the clonogenic as- epidermal cells, thus representing cells that originate from all three
says, cells from the bone marrow of transplanted animals were germ layers. Importantly, in experiments where multipotent sec-
plated in the presence of defined cytokines. Colonies founded by ondary clonal cultures were established, it was shown that a single
single hematopoietic precursors of neural stem cell origin were neural stem cell, had the potential to generate progeny for all
13% pure granulocyte, 30% granulocyte-macrophage, 22% pure three germ layers.
macrophage and 19% mixed colonies. A few colonies did not While many of the transplantation and embryonic differen-
originate from the donor stem cell population confirming that tiation studies have demonstrated the ability of adult neural stem
some endogenous hematopoietic progenitors had survived the cell populations to populate and differentiate into cell types spe-
irradiation. Importantly, none of the neural stem cell cultures or cific for a particular tissue in vivo, their longevity and functional
progeny o f clones used in the transplantation proliferated or contribution to a living organism have not been demonstrated.
formed colonies in the clonogenic assays. The neural stem cells Many of the obstacles hampering the definitive detection of do-
used in this study also generated neurons, astrocytes and oligo- nor cells in these early experiments can now be addressed as new
dendrocytes in vitro, arguing against the possibility that the blood genetically marked strains of mice and methods increasing the
forming cells from the brain were stray hematopoietic stem cells efficiency of cellular contribution have been identified. It will be
that contributed to the repopulation of the hematopoietic lineages. of particular interest to determine whether the contribution of a
donor stem cell to a particular adult stem cell niche will allow the
D ifferentiation to O ther Som atic C ell Lineages original donor stem cell to retain its ability to self-renew, con-
The myogenic potential o f adult neural stem cells has also tinuously contributing to the neogenesis of cell types particular
been recently demonstrated. Co-culture of primary mouse or to that tissue. It will also be of interest to determine whether stem
human neural stem cells with myoblasts or injection of the neu- cells introduced into the early embryonic environment exhibit
ral stem cells into skeletal muscle of adult mice resulted in the germline contribution.
16 Stem Ceil Therapy for Autoimmune Disease
N eural Stem C ell P otency 10. Lumsden A, Krumlauf R. Patterning the vertebrate neuraxis. Science
1996; 274:1109-1115.
The culture of many neural stem cell populations as heterog-
11. Rao MS, Mayer-Proschel M. Glial-restricted precursors are derived
enous nonadherent clusters of cells, termed neurospheres, may from multipotent neuroepithelial stem cells. Dev Biol 1997;
be necessary to prevent the irreversible determination and differ- 188:48-63.
entiation of these cells. Clonal analysis of neural stem cell popu- 12. Levison SW, Goldman JE. Multipotential and lineage restricted
lations typically results in the clonal growth of 4 to 6% of the precursors coexist in the mammalian perinatal subventricular zone.
total starting population, provided the cells are exposed to condi- J Neurosci Res 1997; 48:83-94.
13. Price J, Thurlow L. Cell lineage in the rat cerebral cortex: A study
tioned medium isolated from densely proliferating neural stem
using retroviral-mediated gene transfer. D evelopm ent 1988;
cell cultures.26 However, if single cells are seeded densely in cul- 104:173-182.
ture medium immediately following dissociation and allowed to 14. Levison SW, Goldman JE. Both oligodendrocytes and astrocytes
physically aggregate with other similar cells, the majority of the develop from progenitors in the subventricular zone o f postnatal rat
cell population survives and continues to proliferate in culture. brain. Neuron 1993; 10:201-212.
Even more striking, is the observation that contribution of 15. Price J. Glial cell lineage and development. Curr Opin Neurobiol
adult-derived neural stem cells to embryonic tissues required that 1994; 4:680-686.
16. Frisén J, Johansson CB, Lothian C et al. Central nervous system
small clusters of clonal or heterogenous neural stem cell popula-
stem cells in the embryo and adult. Cell Mol Life Sci 1998;
tions be introduced into the early blastocyst or gastrulating chick 54:935-45.
embryo in order to reproducibly observe contribution of these 17. Gage, FH. M ammalian Neural Stem C ells. Science 2000;
cells to various germ layers.48 Together, these observations have 287:1433-1438.
important implications for both the existence o f short-range fac- 18. Gaiano N, Fishell, G. Transplantation as a tool to study progenitors
tors that may help maintain proliferation and prevent the differ- within the vertebrate nervous system. J Neurobiol 1999; 36:152-161.
19. Kalyani AJ, Piper D, MujtabaT et al. Spinal cord neuronal precursors
entiation of these cells49 and cell surface molecules that may be
generate multiple neuronal phenotypes in culture. J Neurosci 1998;
important in specifying the number of cells that are allowed to 18:7856-7868.
initiate a differentiation program at any given time.50'52 20. Temple S. The Development o f neural stem cells. Nature 2001;
Developmental biologists have long made the distinction be- 414:112-117.
tween the determ ination o f myogenic cells, as a state that is 21. Altman J, Das GD. Autoradiographic and histological studies of
inherently plastic and easily reversible in vitro, and terminal postnatal neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol 1966; 126:337-90.
22. Bayer SA, Yackel JW, Puri PS. Neurons in the rat dentate gyrus
differentiation, a more committed state that leads to terminal
granular layer substantially increase during juvenile and adult life.
muscle differentiation. In a similar manner, proneural genes that Science 1982; 216:890-892.
promote the initiation of the neuronal program, are thought to 23. Reynolds BA, Weiss S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from
activate a second wave of proteins that are expressed in neural isolated cells o f the adult mammalian nervous system. Science 1992;
stem cells, the determination genes. W hen their activity reaches a 255:1707-1710.
threshold, these proteins activate the expression o f downstream 24. Lois C, Alvarez-Buylla A. Proliferating subventricular zone cells in
differentiation genes to promote exit from the cell cycle and ter- the adult mammalian forebrain can differentiate into neurons and
glia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:2074-2077.
minal neuronal differentiation. If, for example, it was possible to
25. Eriksson PS, Perfilieva E, Bjork-Eriksson T et al. Neurogenesis in
block the expression of the determination and proneural genes, the adult human hippocampus. Nat Med 1998; 4:1313-1317.
neural stem cells may revert back to a more primative ground 26. Johansson CB, Momma S, Clarke DL et al. Identification of a neural
state where they would have the option to proliferate and be- stem cell in the adult mammalian central nervous system. Cell 1999;
come a neuron, glial cell or any number of different cell types at 96:25-34.
a later time.53 Evidence exists for the multilineage expression of 27. Doetsch F, Caille I, Lim DA et al. Subventricular zone astrocytes
are neural stem cells in the adult mammalian brain. Cell 1999;
genes in stem cells prior to lineage commitment. 4,55 Thus regu-
97:703-716.
lation of gene expression in a population of closely associated 28. Rietze RL, Valcanis H, Brooker GF et al. Purification of a pluripotent
cells may prove to be critical in maintaining neuroepithelial cells neural stem cell from the adult mouse brain. Nature 2001;
or stem cells in a plastic or more primitive state. 412:736-739.
29. Barres BA. A new role for glia: Generation o f neurons! Cell 1999;
97:667-670.
References
30. Johe KK, Hazel TG, Muller T et al. Single factors direct the
1. Barres BA, Barde Y. Neuronal and glial cell biology. Curr Opin
differentiation o f stem cells from the fetal and adult central nervous
Neurobiol 2000; 10(5):642-648.
system. Genes Dev 1996; 10:3129-3140.
2. Ullian EM, Sapperstein SK, Christopherson KS et al. Control of
31. Kuhn HG, Winkler J, Kempermann G et al. Epidermal growth factor
synapse number by glia. Science 2001; 291(5504):657-66l. and fibroblast growth factor-2 have different effects on neural
3. Yudkoff M, Nissim I, Daikhin Y et al. Brain glutamate metabolism: progenitors in the adult rat brain. J Neurosci 1997; 17:5820-5829.
Neuronal-astroglial relationships. Dev Neurosci 1993; 15:343-350. 32. Gao FB, Apperly J, Raff M. Cell-intrinsic timers and thyroid
4. Rao MS. Multipotent and restricted precursors in the central nervous hormone regulate the probability o f cell-cycle withdrawl and
system. Anat Rec 1999; 257:137-148. differentiation o f oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Dev Biol 1998;
5. McConnell SK. Constructing the cerebral cortex: Neurogenesis and 197:54-66.
fate determination. Neuron 1995; 15:761-768. 33. Hart IK, Richardson W D, Bolsover SR et al. PDGF and intracellular
6. Altmann CR, Brivanlou AH. Neural patterning in the vertebrate signaling in the timing o f oligodendrocyte differentiation. J Cell Biol
embryo. Int Rev Cytol 2001; 203:447-482. 1989; 109:3411-3417.
7. Weinstein DC, Hemmati-Brivanlou A. Neural induction. Annu Rev 34. Pringle NP, Richardson W D. A singularity o f PDGF alpha receptor
Dev Biol 1999; 15:411-433. expression in the dorso-ventral axis o f the neural tube may define
8. Wolpert L. Positional information and pattern formation in the origin o f the oligodendrocyte lineage. Development 1993;
development. Dev Genet 1994; 15:485-490. 117:525-533.
9. Kobayashi D, Kobayashi M, Matsumoto K et al. Early subdivisions 35. Sommer I, Schachner M. Monoclonal antibodies to oligodendrocyte
in the neural plate define distinct competence for inductive signals. cell surfaces: An immunocytological study in the central nervous
Development 2001; 129:83-93. system. Dev Biol 1981; 83:311-327.
Neural Stem Cells and Oligodendrocyte Progenitors in the Central Nervous System 17
36. Temple S, Raff M. Clonal analysis o f oligodendrocyte development 46. Bjornson CR, Rietze RL, Reynolds BA et al. Turning brain into
in culture: Evidence for a developmental clock that counts cell blood: a hematopoietic fate adopted by adult neural stem cells in
divisions. Cell 1986; 44(5):773-9. vivo. Science 1999; 283:534-537.
37. Brusde O, Jones KN, Learish RD et al. Embryonic stem cell-derived 47. Galli R, Borello U, Gritti A et al. Skeletal myogenic potential of
glial precursors: A source o f myelinating transplants. Science 1999;
human and mouse neural stem cells. Nature Neurosci 2000;
283:754-736.
38. Zhang S, Ge B, Duncan ID. Adult brain retains the potential to 3:986-991.
generate oligodendroglial progenitors with extensive myelination 48. Clarke DL, Johansson CB, Wilbertz J et al. Generalized potential of
capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:4089-4094. adult neural stem cells. Science 2000; 288:1660-1663.
39. Shihabuddin LS, Horner PJ, Ray J et al. Adult spinal cord stem 49. Taupin P, Ray J, Fischer W H et al. FGF-2-responsive neural stem
cells regenerate neurons after transplantation in the adult dentate cell proliferation requires CCg, a novel autocrine/paracrine cofactor.
gyrus. J Neurosci 2000; 20:8727-8735. Neuron 2000; 28(2):385-397.
40. Suhonen JO, Peterson DA, Ray J et al. Differentiation of adult 50. Wang S, Barres BA. Up a notch: Instructing gliogenesis. Neuron
hippocampus-derived progenitors into olfactory neurons in vivo. 2000; 27:197-200.
Nature 1996; 383:624-627.
51. Kondo T, Raff M. Oligodendrocyte precursor cells reprogrammed
41. Weissman IL, Anderson DJ, Gage F. Stem and progenitor cells:
Origins, phenotypes, lineage commitments, and transdifferentiations. to becom e m u ltip oten tial C N S stem cells. Science 2000;
Annu Rev Cell Biol 2001; 17:387-403. 289:1754-1757.
42. Blau H M , Baltimore D. Differentiation requires continuous 52. Tsai RYL, McKay RDG. Cell contact regulates fate choice by cortical
regulation. J Cell Biol 1991; 112:781-783. stem cells. J Neurosci 2000; 20:3725-3735.
43. Terskikh AV, Easterday MC, Li L et al. From hematopoiesis to 53. Kintner, C. Neurogenesis in embryos and in adult neural stem cells.
neuropoiesis: Evidence o f overlapping genetic programs. Proc Natl J Neurosci 2002; 22(3):639-643.
Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:7934-7939. 54. Hu M, Krause D, Greaves M et al. Multilineage gene expression
44. Brazelton TR, Rossi FMV, Keshet GI et al. From marrow to brain:
precedes commitment in the hematopoietic system. Genes Dev 1997;
Expression o f neuronal phenotypes in adult mice. Science 2000;
11:774-785.
290:1775-1779.
45. Mezey E, Chandross KJ, Harta G et al. Turning Blood into Brain: 55. Busslinger M, Nutt SL, Rolink AG. Lineage commitment in
Cells bearing neuronal antigens generated in vivo from bone marrow. lymphopoiesis. Curr Opin Immunol 2000; 12:151-158.
Science 2000; 290:1779-1782.
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
In presence of the magistrates of the Canongate,
Edinburgh, ‘William Heriot, younger, baxter, 1568-9. Jan. 10.
became, out of his awn free motive will, cautioner
for George Heriot, that the said George sall remove furth of this
burgh and freedom thereof, within the space of fifteen days next,
and nae be fund thereintill, in case the said George associate not
himself to the religion of Christ’s kirk, and satisfie the kirk in making
of repentance, as effeirs.’—C. C. R.
This was a part of the process of completing the Reformation.
‘In this time there was ane monstrous fish seen in Loch Fyne, having
great een in the head thereof, and at some times wald stand aboon
the water as high as the mast of a ship; and the said [creature] had
upon the head thereof [twa crowns, ane] aboon little, and the
downmaist crown meikle; whilk was reportit by wise men, that the
same was ane sign and taiken of ane sudden alteration within this
realm.’—D. O.
The low intelligence of the age is seen in nothing more
conspicuously than in the numerous tales of animals alleged to have
been seen, with peculiarities impossible in nature, and believed to be
ominous of public calamity. The appearance of a similar animal in
another of the Argyleshire lochs in 1510 is noted by Hector Boece,
on the information of Duncan Campbell, a noble knight. This ‘terrible
beast’ was ‘of the bigness of a greyhound, and footed like a gander.
Issuing out of the water early in the morning about midsummer,’ he
‘did very easily and without any force or straining of himself
overthrow huge oaks with his tail, and therewith killed outright three
men that hunted him with three strokes of his said tail, the rest of
them saving themselves in trees thereabouts, whilst the aforesaid
monster returned to the water. Those that are given to the
observation of rare and uncouth sights, believe that this beast is
never seen but against some great trouble and mischief to come
upon the realm of Scotland.’70
In Holinshed’s Chronicle (1577), the Firth of Forth is said
occasionally to contain ‘sundry fishes of a monstrous shape, with
cowls hanging over their heads like unto monks, and in the rest
resembling the body of man. They shew themselves above the water
to the navel, howbeit they never appear but against some great
pestilence of men or murrain of cattle; wherefore their only sight
doth breed great terror to the Scottish nation, who are very great
observers of uncouth signs and tokens.’
On the whole, it is most likely that some species of the cetacea or
phocidæ was concerned in giving rise to these tales of sea-monsters.
Sir William Sinclair of Roslin, who was living at this
time, thus notes the appearance of an 1570.
extraordinary animal in the year 1500: ‘Hutcheon
Frizell in Glenconie, the best and maist in estimation of the Lord
Lovat’s kin, he and ane servand with him, being at the hunting on
ane hie land amang very rank heather, twa arrow-draught frae him
he heard like the call of ane ratch approaching near and near, while
[till] at the last he saw it, and shot at it ane dead straik with ane
arrow; where it lap and welterit up and down ane spear length of
breadth and length. The heather and bent being mair nor ane foot
of height, it being in the deid-thraw, brint all to the eird [earth], as it
had been muirburn. It was mair nor twa eln of length, as great as
the coist of ane man, without feet, having ane mickle fin on ilk side,
with ane tail and ane terrible head. His great deer-dogs wald not
come near it. It had great speed. They callit it ane dragon.’71
He commemorates a sea-animal not less wonderful, which was
thrown upon the coast of Northumberland in 1544. ‘At the sea-side
at Bamburgh, there was nae kind of fish ta’en by the space of twa
year; but the sea made ane great routing and horrible noise, which
was by [beside] custom and use. So it chancit, at the hie spring
[tide], that ane terrible beast was casten in dead, of the quantity
[bulk] of ane man. Nae man could devise ane thing mair terrible,
with horns on the head of it, red een, with misshapen face, with
lucken [webbed] hands and feet, and ane great rumple hinging to
the eird. It consumit and stinkit sae, that in short time nae man nor
beast might come near it; but all the country about saw it before,
and sundry took great fear and dreadour for the sicht of it a lang
space after. It was callit a Sea-devil. Witness the Laird of Mow.’72
‘The summer right guid, and all victuals guid cheap; the August right
fair and guid weather.’—C. F.
This year ‘great weirs in the north land betwixt the Gordons and
Forbeses, and the Forbeses put till the warst, and mony slain of
them, and towns wasted and burnt.’—C. F.
Adam Gordon, brother of the Earl of Huntly, was a leader in these
broils, and of some avail in supporting the queen’s cause. He stained
his name by a frightful act of cruelty. The house of Towie, belonging
to Alexander Forbes, was maintained by his lady against Gordon. On
his sending to demand its surrender, the brave dame answered that
she could not give it up without direction from her husband. Gordon
then set fire to it, and burnt the heroic woman, her children and
servants—twenty-seven persons in all!
July. 1571.
The queen’s party, after holding a parliament in Edinburgh, where
they affected formally to re-establish her government, sent a
pursuivant to Jedburgh, ‘to proclaim the new erected authority,’
probably thinking that the man would be safe in the performance of
his duty at that town through the favour of Kerr of Ferniehirst, their
fellow-partisan. They little reckoned on the spirit of the Border
burghers. ‘He was suffered to read his letters till he came to this
point, that the lords assembled in Edinburgh had found all the
proceedings against the queen null, and that all men should obey
her only. Then the provost caused the pursuivant to come down
from the cross, and eat his letters. Thereafter, [he] caused loose
down his points, and gave him his wages —— with a bridle; and
threatened that if ever he came again, he should lose his life.
Ferniehirst threatened the town: but they gave him the defiance.’—
Cal.
A few months after, Ferniehirst and Buccleuch mustered a great
multitude of the Border thieves, and came to take vengeance on the
burghers of Jedburgh. The town, assisted by Kerr of Cessford, stood
to its defence; and when Lord Ruthven came with a party of horse
to aid them, they were able to beat back the assailants, many of
whom fell into their hands.
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookfinal.com