Paper 59 Oct 2022 Ans 06 Feb 2023
Paper 59 Oct 2022 Ans 06 Feb 2023
AHM TVHM
SF
70,298.61
1.33
AHM 52,856.10 tm
Δ 61,230
10.49 10.500 46,933
10.40 10.400 48,288
0.09 0.100 - 1,355
10.49 47,069
Δ 61,814
10.49 10.500 47,328
10.40 10.400 48,695
0.09 0.100 - 1,367
10.49 47,465
KGF 10.490
61,706 61,814 47,465
61,230 61,230 47,069
476 584 396
832902603.docx 1
Approx heel 52,856 x 12˚
47,392
V/L does not comply with the minimum criteria specified in the IMO Grain Code
IF
The vessel is upright on sailing
832902603.docx 2
Q2
(a)
832902603.docx 3
832902603.docx 4
Add to calculated draft.
832902603.docx 5
3. A box-shaped vessel floating at an even keel in salt water has the
following particulars:
V 1 0 ,6 4 0 .0 m 3 V lo s t 1 ,3 3 0 .0 m 3
D 1 0 ,9 0 6 .0 t
832902603.docx 6
S in k a g e V o l o f lo s t b u o y a n c y x μ
In t a c t a re a o f w a t e rp la n e
14 x 19 x 5.00 x 1.00
(1 1 2 - 1 4 x 1 ) x 1 9
S in k a g e 0.714 m
In it ia l d ra u g h t 5.000 m
S in k a g e 0.714 m
B ilg e d d ra u g h t 5.714 m
B e fo re b ilg in g
KB d 5 .0 0 0 2 .5 0 0 m
2 2
B e fo re b ilg in g
KB d 5 .0 0 0 2 .5 0 0 m
2 2
KMT 2 .5 0 0 + 6 .0 1 7 8 .5 1 7 m
A ft e r b ilg in g
KB d 5.714 2.857 m
2 2
BMT i LB 3 (1 1 2 -1 4 ) x 1 9 3 5.265 m
V 12 V 12 x 10,640
B e fo re b ilg in g K M T 8.517 m
A ft e r b ilg in g K M T 8.122 m K B in c re a s e B M d e c re a s e
\ C h a n g e in s t a b ilit y -0 . 3 9 5 m D e c re a s e
832902603.docx 7
4. (a) A standard cargo vessel is slow steaming head to wind (hove to) in a
large sea.
Describe and explain the effects that the movement of the sea along the
length of the ship will have on the ship’s statical stability compared to (15)
when it is in a calm sea state.
(b)
Sketch and label the effects of EACH of the following wave conditions on
the same axis, on a curve of statical stability:
This is the flat length zone of the vessel and there won’t be much, if any,
variation in the size/shape of the IWPA here and therefore little to no
effect on ship stability.
We need to compare the waterline for the still water condition with the
waterline when the crest is forward and the effect this will have on the KM,
any change in KM will reflect the change in GM (KG is constant).
832902603.docx 8
With the crest forward the IWPA increases compared to the still water condition
and the transverse movement of B increases - BM will increase – KM increases,
GM increases.
832902603.docx 9
832902603.docx 10
832902603.docx 11
5. A multipurpose vessel, assigned timber load lines, loads
THREE different cargoes to the maximum respective load
waterline on successive voyages:
• Grain;
• General cargo.
(b)
Explan why EACH of the above conditions have different (16)
metacentric height requirements.
(c)
State, giving reasons, whether the natural roll period of the (8)
ship when loaded in the above THREE conditions would vary.
(a)
So the Examiner should accept either 0.15 m or 0.10 m! But the Examiner is
inferring in part (b) that he was looking for the ‘smaller’ GM
832902603.docx 12
Grain
From the Grain Code
7 Stability requirements
7.1 The intact stability characteristics of any ship carrying bulk grain shall be
shown to meet, throughout the voyage, at least the following criteria after
taking into account in the manner described in part B of this Code and,
in figure A 7, the heeling moments due to grain shift:
.3 the initial metacentric height, after correction for the free surface
effects of liquids in tanks, shall be not less than 0.30 m.
General Cargo
2.2.4 The initial metacentric height GM0 shall not be less than 0.15 m.
5(b)
Explain why they have different GM’s.
MR
Part b) Candidates’ answers expose their shallow depth of knowledge. Many
unable to link the characteristics of the loaded cargo with variations in minimum
GMi. Occasionally a Candidate employed a sketch of statical stability to buttress
their argument which was welcomed.
832902603.docx 13
Grain
The tendency of grain, when carried in its bulk natural state, to shift within the
cargo space of a ship moving in a seaway represents a potential hazard to vessel
and crew.
In the past vessel’s loaded with grain were lost and these were several cases
where severe lists from shifting grain caused ships to return to port for correction
of their trim.
The IMO Grain Rules are based on the recognition that in a compartment
nominally filled with grain there exists a void space between the surface of the
grain and the crown or deckhead of the loaded compartment.
The Grain Rules require demonstration by calculation that at all times during a
voyage the ship will have sufficient intact stability to provide adequate residual
dynamic stability after taking into account the adverse heeling effects caused by
an assumed pattern of grain movement in the void spaces lying directly above
the grain surfaces.
The grain shift will cause the vessel to list, causing loss of stability.
General Cargo
I would suggest that everyone has a look at the ‘Explanatory Notes to the IS
Code, 2008.
Chapter 3 Origin of the present stability criteria.
From statistical analysis by the IMO of various casualties the Sub committee
drew up minimum intact stability criteria for still water conditions.
This was done notwithstanding the fact that if a ship sails in a seaway, the curve
of static stability levers changes.
The curve could be characterised using a minimum set of parameters, amongst
them a minimum GM0 of 0.15 m.
(c) The natural rolling period when loaded in the three conditions would most
likely vary.
Reasons
Rolling Period T(Sec) =
832902603.docx 14
Small GM - longer roll period.
‘C’ - Is the coefficient describing the ship’s transverse gyration radius. The
deeper the draught, the smaller the value of ‘C’ and the shorter the roll period.
This factor is also modified by the waterline length with longer ships
experiencing shorter roll periods for the same Breadth to depth ratio.
The vessel’s radius of gyration will also vary with the transverse and vertical
distribution of deadweight.
Winging out weights will increase the vessels natural rolling period.
Weights concentrated towards the vessel’s centreline will reduce the vessel’s
natural rolling period.
MR
Few, if any, recognised that both grain and timber cargoes are loaded across the
full breadth of the same vessel leaving GMi as the only variable.
So with the grain cargo &TDC there is no way to wing out weights.
c 0.373 + 0.023 20.42 - 0.043 137.5 0.407807 c 0.373 + 0.023 20.42 - 0.043 137.5 0.360841
5 100 10 100
C reduces RP reduces
rp 2C B rp 2C B
root gm root gm
832902603.docx 15
6. (a) Describe the inclining experiment procedure to find the Lightship (12)
KG.
(b)
Identify and explain a recommended mooring arrangement which (5)
would not unduly influence the integrity of the results of the
inclining experiment.
(c)
List and explain SIX possible reasons why a vessel’s Lightship KG (18)
may change over a period of time.
832902603.docx 16
ANNEX 1
DETAILED GUIDANCE FOR THE CONDUCT OF AN INCLINING TEST
4 TEST PROCEDURE
The inclining experiment, the freeboard/draught readings and the survey may be
conducted in any order and still achieve the same results. If the person
conducting the inclining test is confident that the survey will show that the ship
is in an acceptable condition and there is the possibility of the weather becoming
unfavourable, then it is suggested that the inclining be performed first and the
survey last. If the person conducting the test is doubtful that the ship is complete
enough for the test, it is recommended that the survey be performed first since
this could invalidate the entire test, regardless of the weather conditions. It is
very important that all weights, the number of people on board, etc., remain
constant throughout the test.
832902603.docx 17