Ch8. Game theory
Ch8. Game theory
GAME THEORY
Dr. Nguyen Bich Diep
[email protected]
GAME THEORY
Player B
Confess Deny
• Each player has a dominant strategy – Confess, and the game has a
dominant strategy equilibrium – (Confess, Confess).
• However, If they both chose Deny, both of them would have been
better off. In this case, the equilibrium in dominant strategies is not
Pareto efficient.
DOMINANT STRATEGIES
Firm B
High Low
production production
High
16,16 20,15
production
Firm A
Low
15,20 18,18
production
NASH EQUILIBRIUM
• Dominant strategy equilibria are nice when they happen, but they
don’t happen all that often.
• In many cases, a player’s optimal choice depends on what he thinks
the other players will do.
NASH EQUILIBRIUM
• An example
Player B
Sports Comedy
• Patrolling game
Patroller
A B
A -1,1 1,-1 p
Attacker
B 1,-1 -1,1 1–p
q 1–q
MIXED STRATEGY EQUILIBRIUM
• In the preceding section, the players met only once and played the
prisoner’s dilemma game a single time. However, the situation is
different if the game is to be played repeatedly by the same players.
REPEATED GAMES
• “Tit for tat”: the policy of cooperating in the first round and then doing
whatever the other player did in the previous round.
• The tit-for-tat strategy enforces cooperation because it offers an
immediate punishment for defection. It is also a forgiving strategy: it
punishes the other player only once for each defection.
REPEATED GAMES
10,5
0,0
A
5,10
B
0,0
10,5
0,0
A
5,10
B
0,0
CREDIBLE THREATS
• Player B can threaten to play Decline if player A plays Split the bill. But
this threat is not credible, i.e., it is not rational for player A to believe
that player B will carry it out.
• Player B can make his threat credible by limiting his choices.
A GAME OF ENTRY DETERRENCE
1,9
Entrant
0,0
Incumbent
2,1
A GAME OF ENTRY DETERRENCE
• The equilibrium outcome is for the potential entrant to enter and the
incumbent not to fight.
• Suppose that the incumbent can purchase some extra production
capacity that will allow him to produce more output at his current
marginal cost and compete much more successfully against the new
entrant.
A GAME OF ENTRY DETERRENCE
1,9
Entrant
0,2
Incumbent
2,1
A GAME OF ENTRY DETERRENCE