Introducing To General Sociology
Introducing To General Sociology
The M.A. Examination in Sociology has been divided into four Semesters spread over two years. Every
student has to pass in 84 Credits (48 Compulsory + 32 Optional Credits and 4 Credits- 2 in Semester II and
2 in Semester III from Optional Elective Paper from Other Department- ) out of 148 Credits as necessary to earn
the degree under the new scheme. In 1ST& 2NDsemesters, 12 Compulsory Credits from Compulsory Papers and 8
Optional Credits from Optional Papers shall be offered to the students, whereas in 3RD& 4Th semesters 8
Compulsory Credits from Compulsory Papers and 12 Optional Credits from Optional Papers shall be offered to
the students. In addition to this One Optional Elective Paper from Other Department of 2 Credits each in Semester
II & III are required to earn the Master Degree in Sociology. However, the choice of Optional Credits is subjected
to the availability of teaching faculty in the Department. The paper scheme detail semester-wise is as follow:
2
Scheme of Teaching and Examination for M.A. Sociology under Choice Based Credit System implement w.e.f.
2020-2021 in phased manner of the regular students of UTD
Course Name of the Subject/Paper No. Teaching Scheme Examination Time
No. of (Hrs/Week) Scheme of
Credit (Marks) Paper
L T P (Sem. Internal Total
Theory Assess-
Exam) ment
M.A. Part-I Semester-I
M-SOCC-001 General Sociology 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCC-002 Sociological Theory-I 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCC-003 Research Methodology-I 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-011 Rural Sociology 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-012 Urban Sociology 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-013 Social Anthropology 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-014 Social Psychology 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-015 Social Problems 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M.A. Part-I Semester-II
M-SOCC-004 Sociological Theory-II 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCC-005 Indian Society and Culture 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCC-006 Research Methodology-II 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-016 Political Sociology 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-017 Sociology of Education 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-018 Sociology of Population Studies 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-019 Sociology of Rural Development 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-020 Criminology 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
OESS- 1 To 10 Students will have to opt One Optional 2 2 50 -- 50** 2 Hrs
(compulsory) Elective Paper from Other Department
(Syllabus Copy attached with instruction)
M.A. Part-II Semester-III
M-SOCC-007 Advanced Social Theory Trends 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCC-008 Computer Applications in Social Research 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-021 Gender and Society 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-022 Family & Marriage Welfare Counseling 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-023 Sociology of Religion 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-024 Social Impact Assessment 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-025 Social Change and Development 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-026 Sociology of Marginalized Sections 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-027 Social Change and Social Movements in India 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-028 Practical- Practice of Computer Applications 4 6Hrs/G 100** 1Hrs
OESS- 11 To 20 Students will have to opt One Optional 2 2 50 -- 50** 2 Hrs
(compulsory) Elective Paper from Other Department of
the same subject as taken in Semester II
(Syllabus Copy attached with instruction)
M.A. Part-II Semester-IV
M-SOCC-009 Sociological Concepts and Key Ideas 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCC-010 Society, Economy and Development 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-029 Cultural Studies 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-030 Environment and Society 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-031 Industrial Sociology 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-032 Sociology of Organizations and Human 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
Resource Development
M-SOCE-033 Sociology of Health 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-034 Perspectives on Indian Society 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-035 Sociology of Mass Communication 4 4 ½ hrs/G - 80 20 100 3 Hrs
M-SOCE-036 Practical- Practice of Research Methodology 4 6Hrs/G 100** 1 Hrs
Total Credit (M.A. Semester-I,II,III & IV) 14 84 36 Hrs
8
*The Paper M-SOCE-028 in Semester III & M-SOCE-036 in Semester IV will have practical components.
There will be maximum 3 Groups of Practical in each Semester. Therefore, total workloads will be18 Hrs/week
in each Semester.
* *Indicates that there is no internal assessment marks in Practical Paper & Optional Elective Paper.
3
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit-I Sociology: Nature, Scope and Significance; Development of Sociology as a discipline in
General, and in India; Universalistic Sociology vis-a-vis Indigenization;
Unit- II Basic Concepts: Society, Group, Community, Association, Social System, Social Structure;
Status and Role; Socialization; Culture
Unit- III Social Processes: Associative - Co-operation, Accommodation, Assimilation;
Dissociative – Competition, Conflict;
Social Stratification and Social Mobility
REFERENCES:
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCC-001.2 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCC-001.3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCC-001.4 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 - 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCC-001.1 3 3 3 2
M-SOCC-001.2 3 3 3 2
M-SOCC-001.3 3 3 3 2
M-SOCC-001.4 3 3 3 2
Average 3 3 3 2
5
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus. This
compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees have to
attempt five questions in all.
Unit-I Sociological Theories: Nature and Types; Theory Construction; Sociological Perspectives;
Sociological Imagination.
Unit- II Positivism and Antipositivism:
Positivism: -
Comte –Law of Three Stages
Durkheim – Social Fact, Social Solidarity
Antipositivism: -
Max Weber – Social Action, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
Pareto, Vilfredo – Logical and Non-Logical Action, Circulation of Elites.
Unit- III Structural-Functionalism:
Malinowski – Individualistic Functionalism
Radcliffe Brown – Societal Functionalism
Parsons – Voluntaristic Action, Pattern Variables
Merton –Functional Paradigm, Reference Groups
Unit-IV Conflict Theories:
Karl Marx – Historical-Dialectical Materialism, Modes of Production;
Class Struggle
Dahrendorf – Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Societies
Simmel, Georg – Conflict Propositions
Lewis A, Coser – Functions of Conflict.
REFERENCES:
Abrahm, F. : Modern Sociological Theory, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
Aron, Raymond : Main Currents in Sociological Thought (Vol. I & II), Penguin; 1965
Coser, L.A. : The Functions of Social Conflict, Free Press; 1956
Dahrendorf, R. : Class and Class Conflict in industrial Society, Calif Stanford press; 1959
Durkheim, E. : Division of Labour in Society, Free Press; 1947
Fletcher, R. : The making of Sociology (Vol. I & II), Nelso, London; 1971
Giddens, A. : Capitalism and Modern Sociological Theory, Cambridge Univ. Press; 1997
Martindale, D. : Nature and Types of Sociological Theory, Houghton-Millin, Boston; 1960
Marx, K. : Communist Manifesto (J.H. Laski ed.), Panton, New York; 1967
Marx, K. : Das Capital, Gateway Editions, 1996
Merton, R.K. : Social Theory and Social Structure, Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.; 1968
Mills, C.W. : The Sociological Imagination, Oxford University Press; 1956
Parsons, T. : The Social System, Free Press, New York; 1951
Parsons, T. : The Structure of Social Action, Free Press, New York; 1949
Ritzer, G. : Sociological Theory (IIIrd Ed.), McGraw Hill Inc.; 1992
Turner, J.H. : The structure of Sociological Theory, Rawat Publication, Jaipur; 1978.
Weber, M. : The Protestant Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism, New York; 1930.
6
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCC-002.2 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCC-002.3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCC-002.4 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 3 - 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCC-002.1 3 3 3 2
M-SOCC-002.2 3 3 3 2
M-SOCC-002.3 3 3 3 2
M-SOCC-002.4 3 3 3 2
Average 3 3 3 2
7
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit- III Research Designs and Sampling: Research Design –types; Sampling Probability and Non–
Probability; Determination of Sample Size Scaling Techniques – Bogardus, Likert and Thurstone;
Reliability and Validity,
Unit- IV The Data and Data Collection: Types and Sources of Data Techniques of Data Collection –
Observation, Schedule, Questionnaire, Interview, Case Study; Mixed Method
REFERENCES:
Ackoff R.L : The Designing of Social Research, University of Chicago Press, 1955
Babbie, Earl : The Practice of Social Research, Thomson Asia Pvt. Ltd., Singapore; 2004
Garett H.E. : Statistics in Psychology and Education, Vakils, Bombay, 1981
Goode and Hatt : Methods in Social Research, Mc Graw Hill Co. Ltd., 1952
Kerlinger, F.N. : Foundation of Behavioural Research, Half Ronehartand Winston, New York, 1973
Majumdar, P.K : Research Methods in Social Science, Viva Books Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi; 2005
Matt Henn & Others: A short introduction to Social Research, Vistaar Publication, New Delhi; 2006
Neuman, W.L. : Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (6thEd.),
Pearson Education Inc., New Delhi; 2006
Sarandakos, S. : Social Research (2nd Ed.), Palgrave, New York; 1998
Seltiz, C.H. : Research Methods in Social Relations, Holt Rine Hart, and Winston, 1951
Thakur, D : The Research Methodology in Social Sciences, Deep and Deep Publications, New
Delhi, 1998
Young P.V. : Scientific Social Survey and Research, Prentice Hall New Jersey, 1956
8
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCC-003.2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 - 3 3
M-SOCC-003.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 - 3 3
M-SOCC-003.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 - 3 3
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCC-003.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-003.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-003.3 3 2 3 3
M-SOCC-003.4 3 2 3 3
Average 3 2.5 3 3
9
M-SOCE-011.1 Students will gain an understanding about nature, scope and significance of rural
Sociology.
M-SOCE-011.2 Students would familiarize with the rural social structure.
M-SOCE-011.3 Students will learn about rural economic and political system.
M-SOCE-011.4 Students will know about different social problems of rural area.
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit-I Rural Sociology: Development, Nature & Scope; Significance of village studies;
Rurbanism; Universalization and Parochialization.
Unit- II Rural Social Structure: Agrarian Mode of Production, Agrarian Social Structure &Class
relations, Land Ownership & Agrarian Relations; Jajmani System; Rural Family-Structure
and Change; Caste-tribe Settlements.
Unit- III Rural Economy and Polity: Agrarian Sector in National Perspective; Agrarian Reforms;
Land acquisition issues and policy, Depeasantization; The Second Green Revolution;
Panchayati Raj, Emerging Pattern of Rural Leadership, Rural Transformation
Unit- IV Rural Problems: Agrarian Unrest & Peasant Movements, Rural Poverty, Bonded Labour,
Unemployment; Food Security; Problems of Health and Housing; Changing Intercommunity
Relations & Violence.
REFERENCES:
Ahuja, Ram : Social Problems, Rawat Publication, Jaipur; 2006
Beteille, A. : Studies in Agrarian social Structure, Oxford University Press, New Delhi; 1975
Desai, A.R. : Rural India in Transition, Popular Prakashan, Bombay; 1979
Desai, A.R. : Rural Sociology in India, Popular Prakashan, Bombay; 1996
Dhanagre, D.N. : Peasant Movement, Oxford University Press, New Delhi; 1985
Dube, S.C. : India‘s changing Village: Human Factor in Community Development, Himalayan
Publishing House, Bombay; 1988
Fernandes, Leela : India‘s New Middle Class, Oxford Univ. Press; 2006
Govt. Of India : Food Security Bill, 2011
Maheshwari, S.R. : Rural Development in India, Sage Publication, New Delhi; 1985
Pradhan, P.K. : Land, Labour and Rural Poverty, Himalayan Publishing House Ltd., Bombay; 1988
Randev, B.T. : Bharat Mein Jati aur Varg, Popular Prakashan, Bombay; 1966
Sidhiqui, M.H. : Agrarian Unrest in North India, Vikas Publishing House; 1978
Vidyarthi, L.P. : Leadership in India, Asia Publishing House, Bombay; 1967
10
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-011.2 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-011.3 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 2 3 2 -
M-SOCE-011.4 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-011.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-011.2 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-011.3 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-011.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 2.5 3
11
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-012.2 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-012.3 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 2 - 2 -
M-SOCE-012.4 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-012.1 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-012.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-012.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-012.4 3 3 2 3
Average 3 3 2.5 3
13
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit- 1 Social Anthropology: Meaning, Nature and Scope; Significance Tribal studies Perspective:
Frazer, R. Brown, B. Malinowski.
Unit- II Theoretical and Methodological orientations: Functionalism (R. Brown and Malinowski)
Structuralism (Levi-Straus) and Marxism (Maurice, Godlier). Comparative Study, Fieldwork
approaches; Ethnographic Method
Unit- III Tribal Institutions: Marriage, Family and Kinship, Youth Organisations, Economy, Religion
and Magic
Unit- IV Tribal Society in India: Races and Tribes; Geographical Distribution; Tribal Problems-
Identity and Detribalization; Mainstreaming; Tribal Rights and Livelihood; Welfare Schemes
for Tribes.
REFERENCES:
Beattie, John : Other Cultures: Aims, Methods and Achievements in Anthropology: R.K.P,
London; 1964
Bose, N.K. : Culture and Society in India, Asia Publishing House, New Delhi; 1967
Dube, S.C. : Tribal Heritage of India, Vikas Pub: New Delhi; 1977
Fox, Robin : Encounter with Anthropology: Penguin Books Ltd., England; 1973
Godelier, Maurice : Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology, London: Cambridge University Press; 1973
Harris, Marvin : The Rise of Anthropology, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1972
Heimendorf : Tribes of India; The Struggle for Survival, Oxford University Press; 1982
Christophvon
Keesing, Roger, M. : Cultural Anthropology: A Contemporary Perspective, America: Holt Remmhart
and Winston; 1976
Kuper, Adam : Social Anthropology of Radcliffe Brown, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London; 1977
Madan,T.N.and : An Introduction to Social Anthropology, Asia Publishing House, Delhi; 1980
Majumdar, D.N.
Mandelbaum, G. : Society in India, Popular Parkashan, Bombay; 1974
Pritchard, Evans : Social Anthropology, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London; 1972.
Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. : Structure Function in Primitive Society, R.K.P., London; 1957
Raza, Moonis and : An Atlas of Tribal India, Concept Publishing, Delhi; 1990
A. Ahmad,
Sharma, S. : Tribal Identity and Modern World, Sage, New Delhi; 1994
Singh K.S. : Tribal Movements in India, Vol. 1 & 2: Manohar Publications, Delhi; 1983
Singh, K.S. : The Scheduled Tribes, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 1995
14
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-013.2 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-013.3 3 3 2 2 2 - 2 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-013.4 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-013.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-013.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-013.3 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-013.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 2.75 3
15
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit-I Social Psychology: Definition, Scope, Methods; Relationship with Sociology and Psychology.
Unit-II Social Perception: Human Consciousness and Self-Awareness; Social Cognition; Cognitive
Dissonance; The Nature of Social Self; Impression Formation; Personality dynamics.
Unit-III Social Motivation & Moral: Definition, Nature, Types - Achievement Motivation and Power
Motivation; Moral.
Unit-IV Collective Behaviour: Social Attitude, Prejudices and Stereotypes, Propaganda and Public
Opinion. Violence, Leadership, Social Control
REFERENCES:
Baron, R.A.and Byrne, D.H.: Social Psychology, Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi; (1995)
B.N. Maltzer, W. : Symbolic Interactionism, Routledge and Kegan
John &Others Paul Ltd., New Jersey,(1945).
Karl Mannheim : Essays on Sociology and Social Psychology, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.,
London, 3rd Edition ;( 1966),
Krech D.and Crutchifield : Theory and Problems of Social Psychology, McGraw Hill, New York;(1975)
Kimball Young : A Hand Book of Social Psychology, Routledge and Kegan Payl Ltd, Revised
Edition London, (1963),
Kuppuswami, B. : An Introduction to Social Psychology, Media Promoters & Publishers Pvt,
Ltd. Bombay; (1980),
Lindzey : Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. I & II, Wiley Publishing Co.
The London Third Edition. (ed.)(1964)
Lindgren, H. Clay : An Introduction to Social Psychology, Willey Eastern, New Delhi. (1973),
Merton, R.K. : Social Theory and Social Structure, Amerind Publication, New Delhi; (1968)
McDavid, John and : Social Psychology, CBS Publishers &Distributers, Delhi ;( 1986)
Herbert Harari
Robert R. Evans : Readings in Collective Behaviour, Chicago: Rand Monally College
Publishing Co; (1975)
T.M. Newcomb : Social Psychology, Drvdon Press, New York; (1950),
W.J.H. Sprott : Social Psychology, Methuen and Co. London; (1952)
16
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-014.2 3 3 2 3 2 - 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-014.3 3 3 2 3 2 - 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-014.4 3 3 3 3 2 - 3 2 3 3 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-014.1 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-014.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-014.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-014.4 3 3 2 3
Average 3 3 2.5 3
17
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit-I Social Problem: Meaning; Social Problem Perspectives – Labelling Theory (Becker), Non-
Conformity (Merton), Differential Association (Sutherland), Discourse Theory (Foucault)
Unit-IV Deviant Behaviour: Deviance and Crime, Delinquency; Deviant sub-culture, Corruption;
Alcoholism and Drug Addiction; Vagrancy and Truancy
REFERENCES:
Ahuja Ram : Social Problems in India, Rawat Publications, Jaipur; (1992),
Beteille, Andre. : Social Inequality, OUP, New Delhi; (1974),
Beteille, Andre. : Backward Classes in Contemporary India, Oxford University Press, New Delhi;
(1992),
Berreman, GD : Caste and Other Inequalities: Essays in Inequality, Folklore Institute, Meerut ; (1979),
Ghurye, G.S. : Social Tensions in India, Popular Parkashan, Bombay; (1968),
Gill, S.S. : The Pathology of Corruption, Harper Collin Publisher, New Delhi; (1998),
Inden, Ronald. : Imaging India, Brasil Blackward, Oxford; (1990)
Merton R.K. : Social Theory and Social Structure, Amerind Publishing Company, New Delhi;(1972),
Mamoria, C.B. : Social Problems in India, Kitab Mehal, Allahabad; (1981),
Madan, G.K. : Social Problems, Allied Publications, Bombay; (1973)
Ministry of Home Affairs. : Crime in India, Government of India, New Delhi; 1998.
Monterio, J.P. : Corruption: Control of mal-administration, Bombay: Mankatalss; (1966)
Satya Murty, T.V. : Region, Religion, Caste, Gender and Culture in Contemporary India, OUP.
New Delhi, (1996)
Srinivas, M.N. : Social Change in Modern India: Orient Longman, New Delhi; (1972).
Waxman : The Stigma of Poverty: A Critique of Poverty Theories and Policies,
Pergaman Press, Michigan ( 1983),
18
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-015.2 3 3 3 3 - 3 - 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-015.3 3 3 3 3 - 3 - 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-015.4 3 3 3 3 - 3 - 2 3 3 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 - 3 - 2 3 2.75 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-015.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-015.2 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-015.3 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-015.4 3 3 2 3
Average 3 3 2.25 3
19
Unit- I Exchange Theory: G.C. Homans- Exchange Principles; Peter M. Blau- Power in Exchange;
Emerson- Exchange Network
Unit- II Interactionist Theory: G.H.Mead/Goffman - Symbolic Interactionism; Schutz - Social
Phenomenology; Garfinkel –Ethnomethodology; Clifford Geertz- Thick Description
Unit-III Structuralism and Post-Structuralism: Levi-Strauss–Concept of Social Structure;
Althusser – Structural Marxism; Gramsci – Hegemony; Derrida—Deconstruction
Unit-IV Perspectives on Indian Society: M.K. Gandhi; B.R. Ambedkar; R.K. Mukherjee; G.S. Ghurye;
M.N. Srinivas; Irawati Karve
REFERENCES:
Ambedkar, B.R. : The Untouchable Who Were They and Why They Became Untouchable: Amrit Book, Delhi:
(1949)
Aron, Raymond : Main Currents in Sociological Thought (Vol. I & II), Penguin; 1965/67
Atal, Yogesh : Indian Sociology from Where to Where Rawat Publication, New Delhi; 2003
Berger & Luckmann : The Social Construction of Reality, Penguin; 1963
Brown, A.R. : Structure in Primitive Society, Cohen and West, London
Cohen, S.P. : Modern Sociological Theory, Heinemann Education Books Ltd.; 1968
Collins, R : Sociological Theory, Rawat Publication, Jaipur; 1997
Craib, I. : Modern Social Theory, Harvestor; 1992
Douglas, J. : Introduction to Sociologies of Everyday Life, Allyn and Bacon; 1980
Ghurye, G.S. : Caste and Race in India. Popular Prakashan, Bombay; 1969
Giddens, A. : Central Problem in Social Theory, MacMillan, London; 1983
Giddens, A. : Capitalism and Modern Sociological Theory: Analysis of Writing of Marx, Durkheim and Weber,
Cambridge Univ. Press; 1997
Irawati Karve : Family, Kinship and Marriage in India, New Delhi. OUP
Layder, Derek : Understanding Social Theory (2nd Ed.), Sage Publication, New Delhi;2006
Malinowski, B. : ‗Culture‘ In Encyclopedia of Social Sciences.
Martindale, D. : Nature and Types of Sociological Theory: Houghton-Millin, Boston; 1960
Merton, R.K. : Social Theory and Social Structure: Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.; 1968
Mukerjee, D.P. : Indian Culture: A Sociological Study: Roopa & Sons, Delhi
Oommen, T.K.& : Indian Sociology: Reflections and Introspections,
Parsons, T. : The Structure of Social Action: Free Press, New York; 1949
Ritzer, G. : Sociological Theory: McGraw Hill Inc.; (IIIrd Ed.) 1992
Singhi, N.K. : Theory and Ideology in Indian Sociology. Rawat publication, New Delhi, 1996
Srinivas, M.N. : India‘s Village, Asia Publishing House, Bombay; 1960
Strauss, C. Levy : Social structure in Structural Anthropology, Penguine;1968
Turner, Bryan S : Social Theory, Blackwell Publishing, London; 1996
Turner, J.H. : The structure of Sociological Theory, Rawat Publication, Jaipur; 1995
Thakkar, Usha : Gandhian Perspective of Development. Research Journal of Gandhian Studies Centre (GSC) of
Smt. Chandibai Himathmal Mansukhani College, 2011.
https://www.mkgandhi.org/articles/gandhian-perspective-of-development.html#
Wagner, H. : Introduction: The Phenomenological Approach to Sociology. In Alfred Schutz on Phenomenology
of Social Relations, The University of Chicago Press; 1970.
20
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCC-004.2 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCC-004.3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCC-004.4 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 3 - 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 2.75 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCC-004.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-004.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-004.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-004.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
21
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit- II Social Stratification: Caste -- Features, functions and changes; Caste and Mobility; Minorities
and SCs; Class - Agrarian and Industrial, Changing Class Structure; Scheduled Tribes --
Distribution, Economy and development;
Unit-III Social Movements & Protests: Movements Based on Caste, Ethnicity, Ideology, Gender,
Disability, Religion and Region; Reservation and politics; Role of Caste in Indian Politics;
Political Factions & Pressure Groups.
Unit-IV Family, Marriage and Kinship: Joint Family – Structure, Function and Changing Pattern;
Marriage – Types, Marriage in different ethnic groups; Contemporary changes
Kinship System – Usage, Regional Variations
REFERENCES:
Dube, S.C. : Indian Society, National Book Trust, New Delhi; 1986
Dumont, L. : Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications; University of Chicago
Press, 1981
Ghurye, G.S. : Caste and Role in India, Popular Parkashan, Bombay; 1969
Irawati Karve : Family, Kinship and Marriage in India, New Delhi. OUP
Kapadia, K.M . : Marriage and Family in India, Oxford University Press, Bombay; 1960
Mandelbaum, D.G. : Society in India, Popular Parkashan, Bombay; 1972
Majumdar & Madan : An Introduction to Social Anthropology, Asia Publication House, Bombay; 1966
Momin, A.R. : The Legacy of G.S. Ghurye: A Centennial festschrift, Popular Prakashan, Bombay;
1996
Prabhu, P.H. : Hindu Social Organization, Popular Parkashan, Bombay; 1963
Rao, M.S.A : Social Movements in India, Manohar; New Delhi; (1979)
Rao, M.S.A. : Social Movements and Social Transformation, Macmillan, Delhi; (1979),
Sharma, K.L. : Essays on Social Stratification, Rawat Publication, Jaipur; 1980
Singh, K.S. : Tribal Movements in India, Manohar, New Delhi; (1982),
Singh, Yogendra. : Modernization of Indian Tradition, Thomson press, Faridabad; 1973
Singh, Yogendra. : Social Stratification and change in India, Manohar publications, New Delhi; 1979
Singer & Cohn : Structure and Change in Indian Society, Aldine Publishing Co. Chicago; 1968
Srinivas, M.N. : India Social Structure, Hindustan Publishing Corp. New Delhi; 1980
Srinivas & Shah : Hinduism in International Encyclopedia of Social Science, Meerut; 1970
Srinivas, M.N. : Caste in Modern India and other Essays, Asian Publishing House, Bombay;1966
22
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCC-005.2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCC-005.3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 -
M-SOCC-005.4 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 -
Average 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2.25 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCC-005.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-005.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-005.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-005.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
23
Unit- IV Test of Significance: ‗t‘ test, Chi-Square; ANOVA - One Way and Two Way; Report Writing
and Editing.
Readings:-
Ackoff R.L. : The Designing of Social Research University of Chicago Press, 1955
Babbie, Earl : The Practice of Social Research, Thomson Asia Pvt. Ltd., Singapore; 2004
Bose P.K. : Research Methodology (Third Survey) Monography of ICSSIL New Delhi
Garett H.E. : Statistics in Psychology and Education, Vakils Bombay, 1981
Giddens, A. : New Rules of Sociological Methods, Stanford University Press; 1993
Goode and Hatt : Methods in Social Research: Mc Graw Hill Co. Ltd., 1952
Kerlinger, F.N. : Foundation of Behavioural Research Half Ronehartand Winston, New York,
1973
Lazarsfeld, P.F. : On Social Research and Its Language, University of Chicago Press, 1993
Majumdar, P.K. : Research Methods in Social Science, Viva Books Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi; 2005
Martin H. : The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction, Cambridge University
press, 2000 Matt Henn & others : A Short introduction to Social Research, Vistaar Publication, New
Delhi; 2006
Neuman, W.L. : Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (6th Ed.),
Pearson Education, Inc.2006
Sarantakos, S. : Social Research (2nd Ed.), Palgrave, New York; 1998
Seltiz, C.H. : Research Methods in Social Relations, Holt Rine Hart, and Winston, 1951
Thakur D. : The Research Methodology in Social Sciences, Deep and Deep Publications,
New Delhi, 1998
Young P.V. : Scientific Social Survey and Research, Prentice Hall New Jersy, 1956
24
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCC-006.2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCC-006.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCC-006.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCC-006.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-006.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-006.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-006.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
25
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-016.2 3 3 3 2 - 2 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-016.3 3 3 3 2 - 2 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-016.4 3 3 3 2 - 2 3 2 3 3 2 -
Average 3 3 3 2 - 2 3 2 3 3 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-016.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-016.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-016.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-016.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
27
Unit-I Sociology of Education: Nature, Scope and importance; Relationship of Sociology and
Education; Feature of Educational Sociology.
Unit-II Social Perspectives on Education: Functionalism (Durkheim), Marxist (Althusser), Cultural
Reproduction (Bourdieu)
Alternative thinking on Education-- Gandhi, Ivan Illich
Unit-III Indian Education System: Structure of Education in India; Social issues of Education –
Inequalities, Inclusive Education, Gender Dimension; Commoditization of Education; Values
Education.
Unit-IV Educational Reforms: Kothari Commission, J.B. Patnaik Committee; Education Policy, 1986;
Right to Education and Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan; New Education Policy (NEP) 2020.
REFERENCES:
Acker, S. : Gendered Education: Sociological Reflections on Women: Open University Press,
Buckingham; (1994),
Altbach : India Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Oxford University Press,
Dreze, Jeanand Oxford. (1995),
Sen Amartya
Chanana, Karuna. : Socialization, Education and Women: Explorations in Gender Identity, Orient
Longman, New Delhi ;( 1988),
Chanana, Karuna. : ‗Towards a Study of Education and Social Change, In Economic and Political
Weekly, 27, 14 (4):157-64.; (1979)
Chitnis, Soma & P.G.: Higher Education Reforms in India, Experience & Perspectives, Sage, New Delhi;
(1993)
Durkheim, E. : Education and Sociology, Free Press, New York; (1956),
Gandhi, M.K. : Problems of Education, Navjeevan Prakashan, Ahmadabad; 1962
Gore, M.S.et.al. : Papers on the Sociology of Education in India, NCERT. New Delhi; (ed.).(1975),
Illich, Ivan. : Deschooling Society, Penguin, London; (1973)
Jayaram, N. : Sociology of Education in India, Rawat Publication, Jaipur; (1990),
Kamat, A.R. : Education and Social Change in India, Somaiya, Bombay; (1985)
Robinson, P. : Perspectives in the Sociology of Education: An Introductio,: Routledge and Kegan
Paul, London; (1987)
Shatrugan, M. : Privatizing Higher Education, EPW.pp.2624; (1988),
Shukla, S.C. : Sociological Perspective In Education: A Reader, Chankya Publication, New Delhi
and Kumar, K.(Ed.) (1985)
National Policy on : Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India; Education1986
Edu.
28
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-017.2 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 3 - 3 -
M-SOCE-017.3 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 3 - 3 -
M-SOCE-017.4 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 3 - 3 -
Average 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 3 - 3 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-017.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-017.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-017.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-017.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
29
Unit–I Sociology of Population Studies: Nature, Scope and Importance; Demographic Methods,
Sources of Data.
Unit–II Population Theories: Biological/Natural, Malthusian, Neo-Malthusian, Optimum Population
and Demographic Transition.
Unit–III Fertility: Concept, Measures, Differential Fertility in India, Factors affecting Fertility in India.
Mortality: Concept and Measures; Differential Mortality in India, Factors affecting Mortality
in India; Life table.
Migration: Concept, Types, Trends and Factors; Problem of Migrant Labourers; Indian
Diaspora.
Unit–IV Demographic Structure of India: Age, Sex, Literacy, Rural –Urban, Religious Population,
Over population and Food Security.
REFERENCES:
Agarwal, S.N. : India‘s Population Problems, New Delhi; 1977
Bhende, Ashaand : Principles of Population, Himalaya Publishing Tara Kanitkar, House, Delhi; 1995
Bogue, Donald J. : The Principles of Demography, John Wiley, N.Y.; 1969.
Bose, Ashish : India‘s Basic Demographic Statistics, B.R. Publishing Corporation, New Delhi;
1996
Census of India : New Delhi: Govt. of India.2011
Franda, Marcus : Response to Population Growth in India, Praeger Publishers Inc, 1975
Hansraj : Fundamentals of Demography; 1997: Population Studies with Special reference
to India: Surjeet Publication, Delhi ;( 2003-R)
Malthus, T.R. : An Essay on the Principle of Population, William Pickering, London; 1986
National Family and : (NFHS) (2015-16). Bombay: IIPS.
Health Survey
Premi, M.K. : Social Demography: A Systematic Exposition, Jawahar Publisher. Delhi; 2003
Premi, M.K : Population of India in the New Millennium, National Book Trust, New Delhi
2006
Srinivasan, K. : Population Policy and Reproductive Health, Hindustan Publishing Corporation,
New Delhi; 1996
UN Publication : Determinants and Consequences of Population Growth-1973
30
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-018.2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-018.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-018.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-018.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-018.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-018.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-018.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
31
Course Outcomes
M-SOCE-019.1 Course will enhance the understandings of the students about the historical evolution of rural
development in India and the World.
M-SOCE-019.2 Students will get knowledge about developmental infrastructure available in rural areas.
M-SOCE-019.3 Students will learn different strategies and programs of rural development in India.
M-SOCE-019.4 Students will get a skill to evaluate the outcomes of different welfare programs and will be
proficient in social auditing.
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-019.2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 -
M-SOCE-019.3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 -
M-SOCE-019.4 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-019.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-019.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-019.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-019.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
33
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit- 1 Criminology: Meaning and Scope, Criminality and Para Criminality; Indian Crime Scenario –
Classification and Crime Statistics, National Crime Record Bureau, Indian Penal Code
Unit- II Theoretical Perspectives: Classical and Neo-Classical, Biological, Psychological, Social and
Cartographic, Multi Factor Approach
Unit- III Forms of Crimes: Physical Violence, Economic Crime; White Collar and Blue Collar Crimes,
Organized Crimes, Cyber-Crimes, Crime against Women, Child and elderly people
Unit- IV Correctional and Control Mechanisms: Correctional Approaches-Community Based and
Prison Based; Correctional Programmes - Educational, Recreational and Meditational
remedies; Prison Reforms
REFERENCES:
Teeters, Negleyand : New Horizons in Criminology, Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi; (1959),
Harry Elnar Barnes
Sutherland, Edwin. : Principles of Criminology, General Hall, New York, 1992
Parsonage, William H. : Perspectives on Criminology, Sage Publications, London (1979),
Ministry of Home Affairs : Crime in India. New Delhi: Government of India Annual Report of National
Crime Bureau, New Delhi ;( 1998)
Merton, R.K. : Social Theory and Social Structure, Emerind Publishing Co. New Delhi; 1972
Bedi, Kiran : It Is Always Possible, Sterling Publications Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi; (1998),
Williams, Frank P.and : Criminological Theory, Prentice Hall, New Jersey; (1998).
Marilyn D. Meshere,
Williamson, Herald E. : The Correction Profession, Sage Publications, New Delhi; 1990
Ministry of Home Affairs : Report of the All India Committee on Jail Reforms 1980-83
India.
Goel, Rakesh M.and : Computer Crime: Concept, Control and Prevention, Sysman Computers Pvt. Ltd,
Manohar, S. Powar Bombay; (1994)
Makkar, S.P.Singh : Global perspectives in Criminology, ABC Publications, Jalandhar; (1993).
and Paul C. Friday
Reid, Suetitus. : Crime and Criminology, Dey Dan Press, Illinois ;( 1976)
Shankardas, Rani Dhavan, : Punishment and the Prison, India and International Perspective, Sage
Publications, New Delhi; (2000).
Sutherland, Edwin H. & : Principles of Criminology, The Times of India Press, Bombay; (1968)
Donald R. Cressey.
Walklete, Sandra : Understanding Criminology, Open University Press, Philadelphia; (1998)
34
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-020.2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-020.3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 - 2 -
M-SOCE-020.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-020.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-020.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-020.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-020.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
35
REFERENCES:
Adams Bert N & Sydie, R.A : Sociological Theory, Vaster Publication, New Delhi; (2001),
Aron Raymond : Main Currents in Sociological Thought, Vol.1 and 2, Penguin, Chapters on Marx,
Durkheim and Weber. (1967),
De, Beauvoir, Simon : The Second Sex, Vintage, New York; (1957).
Jhon, Hughes, A. Martin Perer, W.W : Understanding Classical Sociology-Marx, Sage Publication Delhi, 2003
J.and Sharrok : Durkheim and Weber, Sage Publication, London; (1995)
Kivisto, P. : Key Ideas in Sociology (2nd ed.), 8Pine Forge Press, New Delhi,(2004),
Lash, S. : Sociology of Postmodernism; Routledge, London; (1990),
Parsons Talcott : The Structure of Social Action, Vol.1 and 2. McGraw Hill, New York.1949
Ritzer, George : Sociological Theory, McGraw Hill, New York1992.
Ritzer, George : Modern Sociological Theory, McGraw Hill, New York; (2000),
Swingewood, A. : A short history of Sociological thought, Palgrave; New York; (2000),
Seidman, S & Alexander, J.C. : The New Social Theory Reader, Routledge, London; (2001),
Taylor Steve (ed.) : Sociology: Issues and Debates, Palgrave. (1999),
Turner, Jonathan H. : The Structure of Sociological Theory, Rawat Publication, Jaipur (1995) (4th
edition)
Zeitlin, Irving M. : Rethinking Sociology: A Critique of Contemporary Theory, Rawat Publication,
New Delhi; (1998)
36
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCC-007.2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCC-007.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCC-007.4 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 2.75 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCC-007.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-007.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-007.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-007.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
37
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit-III Basic of MS office: MS Word, Creation of files, Editing of Document - Bold , Italics ,
Underline, Fonts type & size, Paragraph, line spacing, spelling & grammar, Insertion of
Images, Tables.
MS Excel: Basics of MS-Excel, Data Entry, Graphs, Aggregate Formulas and Functions,
Worksheet and Charts, Cell Editing.
MS PowerPoint: Creating & Editing of Power Point Presentation, Physical Aspects.
REFERENCES:
Balamurali, S. : An Introduction to Computer Science, Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi; (1998)
Babbie, Earl : The Practice of Social Research 10th edition, Thomson, Singapore; (2004),
Gaur, Ajay S. and : Statistical Method for Practice and Research: a guide to Data analysis using SPSS,
Sanjay S. Gaur Response Books, Delhi; (2006)
Leanand Loen : Internet for Everyone, Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi: (1998),
Mattelart, Armond : The Information Society, Sage Publications, New Delhi; (2003),
Sarantakos, S. : Social Research, Palgrave, New York; (1988)
Saxena, Sanjay : A First Course in Computer, Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi; (1998).
Singhal, A.and E.M. : India‘s Communication Revolution, Sage Publications, London; (2000),
Rogers
Tesch, R. : ‗Computer Software and qualitative Analysis: A Reassessment‘ in Blank et al. (ed.),
New Technology in Sociology: Practical Applications in
Research and Work, Transaction Books, New Brunswick; (1989)
38
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCC-008.2 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 - - 3 3
M-SOCC-008.3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 - - 3 3
M-SOCC-008.4 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 - - 3 3
Average 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 - - 3 3
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCC-008.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-008.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-008.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-008.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
39
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-021.2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-021.3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-021.4 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-021.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-021.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-021.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-021.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
41
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit-I Family and Marriage: Characteristics, Functions and Types; Marriage under Ethnic Civil
Codes in India; Quasi-Marriage (live-in-partnership) and Rights; Inheritance Succession and
Authority.
Unit-II Discrepancies in Family and Marriage: Broken Homes, Family Tension, Role Stresses,
Domestic Violence; Marital Discrepancies- Alienation & Desertion, Divorce, Gender
Injustice, Sexual Harassment; Constraints of Traditions in Hindu and Muslim Marriages;
Problems of Children, Youth and Elderly.
Unit-III Family and Marriage Counselling: Meaning, Nature and Scope of Counselling Intervention;
Institutionalization of Family & Marriage Counselling; Process & Methods of Counseling:
Responding to the discrepant relationships- Registration of Clients and preparing database,
Scrutiny of cases for Intervention, Hearing through Clinics, Helplines, Family Visits;
Distribution of Counselling Literature; Medical aids; Resocialisation and Gender Sensitization
Unit-IV Counselling Approaches/Paradigms: Principles- Ways of Presenting Counselor, understanding
Clients, and Ways of Intervening; Choice of Approaches: Psychodynamics, Humanistic (Empathy-
Sympathy), Cognitive-Behavioural, Family System; Functional, Critical & Feminist and
Postmodern (Narrative Self), Emotive and Moral Corrections; Changing Care and Support System;
Yoga Therapy; Eclecticism of Approaches.
References:-
Ahmed, I. : Family, Kinship and marriage among Muslims in India, Manohar Pub., Delhi, 1976.
Ahuja, Ram : Indian Social System, Rawat Publications, Jaipur, 1984
Ahuja, Ram : Social Problems, Rawat Publication, Jaipur; 2006.
and Carol Jacklin.
Burgess, E.W. & : Predicting success or failure in marriage, Prentice Hall, NY, 1939.
L. S. Cottrell, Jr.
Cheston (Ed) : Counselor: Education and Supervision, Vol. 391, June 2000
De, Beauvoir, Simon: The Second Sex, Vintage, New York; (1957).
Goode William J. : The Family, Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, 1989
Harlambos, M. : Sociology: Themes and perspectives, OPU New Delhi; (1998).
John Mcleod : An Introduction to Counselling, (IIIrd Ed), Open University Press, 2004
Kapadia : Marriage and Family in India, Oxford Press, Delhi1988
Maccoby, Eleaner : The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1975
Patel, Tulsi : Bharat Mein Parivar: Sanrachna evm vyavhar, Rawat, Jaipur, 2011.
Prabhu, P.H. : Hindu Social Organisation, Popular Prakashan, Bombay-2000
Rao S.N. Counselling Psychology, Mc Graw-Hill NewDelhi-2001
Rasheed N. : Family Therapy (Models and Techniques) 2011, Sage Publication, London
Richard S. Sharf : Theories of Psychology and Counselling (Concepts and Cases), 6th Edition, 2012, Cengage
Learning, Australia
Shah, A. M : The household dimensions of the family in India: university of California press, 1974.
Sharon E. : ―Counselor Preparation: A New Paradigm for Teaching Counselling Theory and Practice‖ in
Uberoi, Patricia : Family, kinship and marriage in India (Ed.), Oxford University Press New Delhi, 1993.
Whiston, S.C. : Principles and Applications of Assessment of Counselling (2nd Ed.) Cengage Learning 2009
White, Justine : Abstract of Dissertation-―Navigation Postmodernism & Critical Theory in Family Therapy‖
42
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-022.2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 3 2
M-SOCE-022.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 3 2
M-SOCE-022.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 3 2
Average 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 3 2
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-022.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-022.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-022.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-022.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
43
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit-I Religion: Definition, Functions and Dysfunctions; Ethics and Morality; Fission Tendencies-
Sect and Cults; Ritual Beliefs and Practices; Religion and Science; Scientology
Unit-II Perspectives on Religion: Frazer, Durkheim, Marx and Weber; New Religious Movements;
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-023.2 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-023.3 3 3 3 3 2 - 2 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-023.4 3 3 3 3 2 - 2 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-023.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-023.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-023.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-023.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
45
Unit-I Social Impact Assessment: Definition & Meaning of Social Impact and Social Impact
Assessment; History and features of SIA; Objective, Scope and Importance of SIA.
Unit-II Theoretical Perspectives and Principles of SIA: Nature and Dimensions of Development;
Sustainability of Development, Management of Change; Rural-Urban Communities,
Community Participation and Social Audit of the Schemes.
Unit-III Social and Political Issues: Democratic Polity of India; Social Justice; Human Rights;
Value Conflict and Development Dilemmas; Experiences and issues in dislocation problem
of population and Project Risks.
Unit-IV Methods & Procedure of SIA: Orientation and Framework of SIA; Stages of SIA,
Identification of Stakeholders and Potential Victims of Project; Consultations in SIA.
REFERENCES:
Barrow, C.J. : Environmental and Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction, Arnold: London1997
Barrow, C.J. : Social Impact Assessment: An Introduction, Arnold.London2000
Becker, Henk A. : The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment. Frank Vanclay. Eds.
Cheltenham, Colchester, United Kingdom: Edward ElgarPublishing.2003
Becker, Henk A. : Social Impact Assessment: Method and Experience in Europe, North America, and
Developing World. HCL Press Limited, Gunpowder Square, London.1997
Burdge, Rabel J. : A Community Guide to Social Impact Assessmen, 3rd Edition, Social Ecology
Press.Middleton2004
Canter, Larry W. : Environmental Impact Assessment, NY: McGraw Hill, NewYork1996
Conyers, Diane. : Guidelines on Social Analysis for Rural Area Development Planning. FAO, Rome.
Training Manuel No.73.1993
Geoff Baker : Publications.
Goldman, Laurence : Social Impact Analysis: An Applied Anthropology, Oxford: London 2000
Manuel. R. Ed. Berg
Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment, Prepared by the Inter‐organizational Committee on
1994
Sadar, M. Hussain. : Environmental Impact Assessment: 2nd Edition. Ottawa: Carlton University Press.
ISBN0-88629-300-61998
Shell Corporation. : Social Impact Assessment, HSE Manual EP 95-0371. The Hague, TheNetherlands.1996
Taylor,Nicholas : Social Assessment: Theory, Process and Techniques, Hobson Bryanand Colin (3rd
Waiten, Cathy M, :A Guide to Social Impact Assessment, Research Branch, Corporate Policy, Indian and
Northern Affairs, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada KIAOHA1981
Wildman, Paul & : The Social Impact Assessment Handbook. Lindfield, NSW, Australia: Social Impacts
World Bank, Social : www.world bank.org/ social analysis Sourcebook, 2003
46
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-024.2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-024.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-024.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 - 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 3 3 2.5 2 3 2 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-024.1 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-024.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-024.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-024.4 3 3 2 3
Average 3 3 2.5 3
47
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-025.2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-025.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-025.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 2.75 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-025.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-025.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-025.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-025.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
49
Unit–III Reform and Protest Movements: Social Reform Movements and Underprivileged Classes;
Dalit Movements, Tribal Movements, Women‘s Movements; Subaltern Movements.
Unit–IV Affirmative Action: Inclusive Policies for Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes, Other
Backward Classes; Welfare of Religious Minorities and Women.
REFERENCES:
Ambedkar, B.R. : The Untouchable Who Were They and Why They Became Untouchable, Amrit Book, Delhi:
(1949),
Beteille Andre : Social Inequality, Penguin Book, London; (1975),
Gore, M.S. : The Social Context of an Ideology: The Social and Political Thought of Babasahab Ambedkar,
Sage Publication, Delhi; (1993),
Gupta,Dipankar : Social Stratification, Oxford University, Press, New Delhi; (1991),
Ghadially, Rehana: Women in Indian Society, Sage. New Delhi; (ed.)(1988),
Issacs, Harold : Deprived Castes and their Strength for Equality: Ashish Publishing House, Delhi; (1962).
Jogdand, P.G. : New Economic Policy and Dalits, Rawat Publication. Jaipur; (2000),
Lynch, Owen, M. : The Politics of Untouchability; Social Mobility and Social Change in a City of India, National
Publishing House, Delhi; (1969).
Mathew Joseph : Ideology, Protest and Social Mobility: Case Study of Mahars and Pulayes, Inter-India Publication,
Delhi; (1986).
Omvedt, Gail. : ‗Caste, Class and Women‘s Liberation in India,‘ Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars.7; (1975),
Omvedt Gail : Dalits and the Democratic Revolution, Sage Publications, Delhi; (1999),
Oomen, T.K. : Protest and Change: Studies in Social Movement, Sage Publication, Delhi; (1990),
Pimpley, P.N.& : Struggle for Status, B.R. Publishing House,Delhi;1985
Sharma, Satish
Shah, Ghanshyam : Social Movement in India: A Review of Literature in India, Sage Publication. Delhi; (1990)
Upadhyaya, H.C. : Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe in India, Anmol Publication. Delhi; (Ed.) (1991).
Zelliot, Eleanor : From Untouchable to Dalit: Essays on the Ambedkar Movement, Manohar Publication, New
Delhi; (1995),
Guha, Ranjit : Sub-altern Studies, Oxford University Press, New York 1988.,
India Year Book : Yearly Publication, Govt. of India
50
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-026.2 3 3 3 2 - 3 2 2 2 - 2 -
M-SOCE-026.3 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 2 - 2 -
M-SOCE-026.4 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-026.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-026.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-026.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-026.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
51
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit–I Social Change: Meaning, Dimensions, Types; Endogenic and Exogenic factors; Role of
Innovation in Socio-Economic Change, State interventions towards Social Change
Unit–IV Social Movements and Protests in India: Reform movements; Tribal and Peasants
Movements; Political Factions; Pressure Groups; Movements based on Caste, Ethnicity,
Religion, Region, Ideology, Gender, Disability and Language; Reservation and Politics;
REFERENCES:
Albrow, Martin & : Globalisation, Knowledge and Society, Sage: London; (Ed.), (1990),
Elizabeth King
Banks, J.A. : The Sociology of Social Movements, Macmillan, London; (1972)
Desai, A.R. Ed. : Peasant Struggles in India, Oxford University Press, Bombay; (1979),
Dhanagare, D.N. : Peasant Movements in Indian 1920-1950, O.U.P, Delhi; (1983),
Gore, M.S. : The Social Context of an Ideology: Ambedkar Political and Social Thoughts, (New Delhi:
Sage); (1993)
Harlambos & : Sociology: Themes and Perspectives, 5th Edition, Harper Collins Pub. London; (2000),
Holborn
Nash, J. (ed.) : Social Movements: an anthropological reader, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, (2005),
Oomen, T.K. : Protest and Change: Studies in Social Movements, Sage Publication, Delhi; (1990),
Rao, M.S.A. : Social Movements in India, Manohar; New Delhi; (1979)
Rao, M.S.A. : Social Movements and Social Transformation, Macmillan, Delhi; (1979),
Singh, K.S. : Tribal Movements in India, Manohar, New Delhi; (1982),
Selliot, Eleanor : From Untouchable to Dalit: Essays on the Ambedkar Movement, Manohar, New
Delhi; (1995)
Oommen, T.K. : (Charisma, Stability and Change: An Analysis of Bhoodan Gramdan Movement, Thomas Press, New
Delhi; (1972),
Seidman, S. & : The New Social Theory Reader, Routledge, London. (2001),
Alexander, J.C.
Shah, Ghanshyam : Protest Movements in two Indian States, Ajanta, New Delhi; (1977)
Shah, Ghanshyam : Social Movements in India; a review of the Literature, Sage, Delhi; (1990),
Shah, Nandita : The Issues at Stake: Theory and Practice in the Contemporary women‘s movements in India: Kali for
Women, New Delhi; (1992),
Shiva, Vandana : Ecology and the Politics of Survival, Sage, New Delhi; (1991),
52
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-027.2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-027.3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-027.4 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
Average 3 3 3 2 2.5 3 3 2 3 2 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-027.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-027.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-027.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-027.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
53
Note: This practical paper consists of two parts A and B. Part A consists of twelve practical topics.
The evaluation will be based on practical note book on six topics (ten marks each) out of total twelve
topics. In Part B a practical will be allotted to a candidate during examination and evaluated on the
basis of performance in practical having 20 marks and Viva-voce of 20 marks.
Part-B 40 marks
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-028.2 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 3 - - 3
M-SOCE-028.3 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 3 - - 3
M-SOCE-028.4 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 3 - - 3
Average 3 3 - 3 3 3 3 3 3 - - 3
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-028.1 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-028.2 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-028.3 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-028.4 3 3 2 3
Average 3 3 2 3
55
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit: III Global Society; Network Society; Knowledge Society; Risk Society; Surveillance Society.
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCC-009.2 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 - 3 2 -
M-SOCC-009.3 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 - 3 2 -
M-SOCC-009.4 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 - 3 2 -
Average 3 3 3 2 - 3 3 2 - 3 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCC-009.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-009.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-009.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-009.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
57
UNIT-I Development : Concept and indicators; Variants - Economic Development& its Models, Social
Development, Human Development, Sustainable Development; Idea of Equal Opportunity and
inclusive Development.
UNIT-II Theories of Development: Modernization, Dependency and World system, Globalization-
Glocalization; Paths of Development-Capitalistic, Socialistic, Gandhian; State and Market-
Welfarism and Neoliberalism
UNIT-III Economy and Development: Mode of Production Debates; Exchange, Gift, Capital, Labour
and Market; Property and Property Relations; Digital Economy, E-Commerce; Global Business
and Corporates; Tourism; Consumption; Public-Private Participation, Foreign Direct Investment
(FDI).
UNIT-IV Social Structure and Development: Socio-Cultural impediments to Development; Business
& Family; Break downs in Development--Environmental Crises, Inequalities in Development;
GDP v/s Equality Approach; Human Happiness Index.
Reference
Agarwal, Anil : ―Economy and Environment in India‖, in Anil Aggarwal (ed.) The Price of Forests,
Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi ;( 1989).
Appadurai, Arjun. : Modernity at Large Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Oxford University Press, New Delhi;
1997
Bernd, Hamns& : Sustainable Development and Future of Cities, Intermediate Technology Publication, UNESCO;
Pandurang K.Mutagi 1998
Dereze, Jeanand : India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity, OUP, New Delhi; Amartya Sen. (1996),
Desai, A.R. : India‘s Path of Development: A Marxist Approach, Popular Parkashan. Bombay, 1985
(Chapter2).
Dube, S.C. : Modernization and Development: The Search for Alternative Paradigm, Vistaar Publication,
New Delhi; (1988),
Dube, S.C. : Vikas Ka Samajshastra, Vani Parkashan, New Delhi; (2000),
Giddens, Anthony. : The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge; (1990),
Harrison, D. : The Sociology of Modernization and Development,. New Delhi: Sage; 1989.
Myrdal, G. : In Shanin, Theodor (Ed.), Peasant and Peasant Societies, Penguin; 1966
Sharma, SL : Criteria of Social Development, Journal of Social Action. Jan-Mar; 1980
N. Long : An Introduction to the Sociology of Rural Development, Tavistock Publications; London;
(1977),
Sharma, SL : Development: Socio-Cultural Dimensions, Rawat, Jaipur: 1986.
Srinivas, M.N. : Social Change in Modern India, University of Berkley, Berkley, 1966.
: Symposium on Implications of Globalization, Sociological Bulletin. Vol.44 (Articles by
Mathew, Panini & Pathy);
UNDP. : Sustainable Development, New York: OUP; (1995)
WorldBank. : World Development Report, New York; (1995)
Kiely, Ray and : Globalization and the Third World, Routledge, London; 1998.
PhilMarfleet
Wallerstein Immanue: The Modern World System. OUP, New York,(1974),
World Commission : Our Common Future, (Brundtland Report).OUP, New Delhi; (1987),
58
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCC-010.2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 -
M-SOCC-010.3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 -
M-SOCC-010.4 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 2.5 2 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCC-010.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-010.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-010.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCC-010.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
59
Unit–I Cultural Studies: Emergence; Meaning, Nature and Scope; Place of Cultural studies in
social science and Humanities; Arts and Aesthetics
Unit–II Cultural Studies Perspectives: Contribution of Symbolic Interactionism, Critical School,
Structuralism, Post Structuralism/Postmodernism.
Methods of Cultural Studies- Ethnographic, Anthropological, Discourse Analysis,
Semiotics
Unit–III Key concepts and Methods in Cultural Studies: Cultural Identity and Mobilization,
Representation, Ideology; Cultural Politics; Cultural Text; Sites of Cultural Studies
Unit–IV Production and consumption of Culture: Production of meanings and Signification;
Gender Body and Culture; Production of popular culture; Sports Culture; Post-Modern
Culture.
Reference:
Roll and Barthes : Mythologies, Vintage, Jonarthan Cape; 2000/1972
Gillian Rose : Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the interpretation of visual material (IIndEd.)
Sage Publication Delhi, 2001
Daniel Chandler : Semiotics basics, Routledge, London; 2002
Gary Halland : New Cultural Studies, Adventures in Theory
Clare, Birchall
Jeremy Volentine : Cultural Studies and Post Marxism (Ch.3) in New Cultural Studies, Sage
publication, New Delhi; 2007
Steve Taylor : Sociology: Issue and debates, Palgrave; 1999
Swingwood, Alan : A Short history of Sociological theory, Palgrave; (3rd Ed.) 2000.
Barkar, Chris & : Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis: A dialogue on Language and Identity,
Dariusz, Golasinski Sage Publication, New Delhi; 2001
Nayar, K, Pramod : Literary Theory Today, Asia Book Club, New Delhi.
Lemert Charles (Ed.) : Social Theory: The Multicultural & Classic Readings; Rawat Publication;
(2ndEd.)1999.
John Scottand : Dictionary of Sociology, Oxford University Press; 2009(Revised Ed.)
Garder Merdull
60
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-029.2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-029.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
M-SOCE-029.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 2.5 3 3 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-029.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-029.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-029.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-029.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
61
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-030.2 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 2 3 2 2 -
M-SOCE-030.3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-030.4 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 2 3 2.5 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-030.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-030.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-030.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-030.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
63
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit-I Definition and Perspectives: Nature and Scope of Industrial Sociology; History of
Technological Development; Pace of Industrialization, De-Industrialization & Growth beyond
Industrialization; Major Perspectives – Marx, Weber, Ritzer (McDonaldization)
Unit- III Industrial Work-Force: Changing Character of Work-Force in India; Motivation and Morale;
Work Culture; Worker‘s Welfare; From Collective Bargaining to Individual Negotiation
Unit- IV Industry-Society Interface: Impact of Industry on Social Structure i.e. on Caste, Class, Joint
Family, Kinship and on Socio-Cultural Values of Society; Technology & Changing Family
Relations
Readings:-
Daniel, Bell : The Coming of Post-Industrial Society, Basic Books, New York; 1973
Desai, A.R. : Rise and Development of Modern Indian Industries Perspective Chapter VII in Social
Background of Indian Nationalism; Popular Parkashan, Bombay; 1978
Edwards, Paul : Industrial Relations, Blackwell Publishing; 2003
Faunce, William : Problem of Industrial Society, McGraw Hill Book Company; 1968
Giddens, A. : Sociology (4thEd.) Polity; 2001
Gisbert, S.J. : Fundamental of Industrial Sociology, McGraw Hill; 1972
Hal. R. Arkese & : Psychological Theory of Motivation, Thomson Brooks/Cole 1977
Haralambos : Sociology: Themes and Perspectives, Bell and Hyman, London; 1985
John P.Garske : Brookes/Cole Publishing Co. Ltd. New Delhi; 1985
Hoselitz, B.& : Industrialization and Society, UNESCO;1960
Moore, W.E.
Melvin & Jacks : New Foundations for Industrial Sociology, East-West Press Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi; 1965
Ramaswamy, E.S. : Industrial Relation in India: A Sociological Perspective, Thee Milan, India; 1978
Sheth, N.R. : Industrial Sociology in India, Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi; 1985
Vitalse, M. : Motivation and Morale in Industry, Allied Pub. Bombay; 1962
Watson, T.J. : Sociology, Work and Industry, Routledge; 1995
64
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-031.2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-031.3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-031.4 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 2.5 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-031.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-031.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-031.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-031.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
65
Course Outcomes
M-SOCE-032.1 Students will be acquainted with industrial evolution and growth of formal
organization.
M-SOCE-032.2 Students will learn about organizational behaviour.
M-SOCE-032.3 Students will understand the basic concepts and processes related to the human
resource development.
M-SOCE-032.4 Students will get a substantial understanding of human resource management and
practice in India.
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-032.2 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-032.3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
M-SOCE-032.4 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 - 3 3 2 3 3 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-032.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-032.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-032.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-032.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
67
Note: - The Paper setter shall set 8 questions from all four units of the syllabus giving internal choice.
However, one compulsory question in addition is to be set under fifth unit based on entire syllabus.
This compulsory question would comprise four questions, four marks each. Such way, the examinees
have to attempt five questions in all.
Unit-I Sociology of Health: Meaning and scope; Dimensions of Human Health; Social
Perspective on Health and Illness; Self Concept and Health.
Unit-II Basic Concepts: Health, Disease, Sick role, Health Care, Health Socialization, Health
Social Movements; Medicalization of Society.
Unit-III Distributional aspects of Health and Disease: Caste, Class, Gender, Occupational Groups,
Rural and Urban variations; Life-styles and Diseases.
Unit-IV Health Care and Health Care System in India: Carrying Capacity of Health Institutions;
Health Programmes in India, Health Insurance Schemes; National Rural Health Mission;
WHO Activities
REFERENCES:
Albert, Gary L. and. : Quality of Life in Health Care: Advances in Medical Sociology, Jai Press, Mumbai; (1994)
Fitzpatrick. R
Bloom, S.W. : The Doctor and His Patient: Free Press, New York; (1963)
Conrad, Peter : The Medicalization of Society: On the Transformation of Human Conditions into Medical
Disorders, John Hopkins University Press; (2007)
Dingwal, Robert : Aspects of Illness, Martin Press, London; (1976)
Dutt, P.K. : Rural Health Services, DGHS, New Delhi; (1965)
Freeman, Howard.E. : Handbook of Medical Sociology, Englewood: Prentice-Hall, New-Jersy; (1989)
and SolLevine Cliffs
Hasan, K. :The Cultural Frontiers of Health in Village India, Manakatlas, Bombay;(1967)
Madan, T.N. : Doctors and Society: Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi; 1980
Mechanic, David : Medical Sociology: A Selective View, Free Press, New-York; (1968)
Government of India : National Rural Health Mission, 2005
Oommen, T.K. : Doctors and Nurses: A Study in Occupational Role Structure, Macmillan, Delhi; (1978)
Park, J.R.& K. Park : Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine, Banarasidass and Company Jabalpur; (2000)
Parson, Talcott : The Social System: Free Press, Illinois; (1951),
Tailor, S. Ch. : ―Health, Illness and Medicine‖ pp253-276 in Sociology: Issues and Debates Ed. by Taylor
Steve; Palgrave, 1999
Schawatz, H. : Dominant Issues in Medical Sociology, McGraw-Hill, New York; (1994)
Taylor Steve : Sociology: Issues and Debates, Palgrave; (ed.) (1999),
68
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-033.2 3 3 2 3 - 3 3 2 2 - 2 -
M-SOCE-033.3 3 3 2 3 - 3 3 2 2 - 2 -
M-SOCE-033.4 3 3 2 3 - 3 3 2 2 - 2 -
Average 3 3 2 3 - 3 3 2 2 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-033.1 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-033.2 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-033.3 3 3 2 3
M-SOCE-033.4 3 3 2 3
Average 3 3 2 3
69
Readings:-
Atal, Yogesh : Indian Sociology from Where to Where Rawat Publication, New Delhi; 2003
Ambedkar, B.R. : The Untouchable Who Were They and Why They Became Untouchable, Amrit Book,
Delhi: (1949),
Desai, A.R. : Rural Sociology in India, Popular Prakashan, Bombay; 1996
Desai, A.R. : Rural India in Transition, Popular Prakashan, Bombay; 1979
Dube, S.C. : Indian Village, Routledge, London; 1967
Dhanagre, D.N. : Themes and Perspective in Indian Sociology, Rawat Publication, Jaipur; 1993
Dumont, Louis : Homo Hierarchicus: The caste System and its Implications, Vikas Pub., New Delhi;
1970
Ghurye, G.S. : Caste and Race in India Popular Prakashan, Bombay; 1969
Hardiman, D. : Feeding the Bania: Peasants and Usurers in Western India, Oxford University Press;
1996
Hardiman, D. : The Coming of the Devi: Adivasi Assertion in Western India, Oxford University Press;
1987
Marriot, M. : India Through Hindu categories, Sage Publication, New Delhi; 1990
Mendalbaum, G. : Society in India: (Vol.I & II), Popular Prakashan, Bombay.
Momin, A.R. : The Legacy of G.S. Ghurye: A Centennial Festschrift, Popular Parkashan, Bombay;
1996
Mukerjee,D.P. : Indian Culture: A Sociological Study, Roopa & Sons, Delhi
Oommen, T.K.& : Indian Sociology: Reflections and Introspections, Popular Parkashan, Bombay;1986
Mukerjee, P.N.
Singh, Y. : Modernization of Indian Tradition, Thomson press, Faridabad; 1973
Singh, Y. : Indian Sociology: Social Conditioning and Emerging Concerns, Vistaar Pub., Delhi;
1986
Srinivas, M.N. : India‘s Village, Asia Publishing House, Bombay; 1960
Surinder S. Jodhka : Village Society, Orient Black Swan, Delhi, 2012
(ed.)
70
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-034.2 3 3 3 3 - 2 - 2 2 - 2 -
M-SOCE-034.3 3 3 3 3 - 2 - 2 2 - 2 -
M-SOCE-034.4 3 3 3 3 - 2 - 3 2 - 2 -
Average 3 3 3 3 - 2 - 2.25 2 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-034.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-034.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-034.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-034.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
71
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-035.2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 -
M-SOCE-035.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 -
M-SOCE-035.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 -
Average 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-035.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-035.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-035.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-035.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
73
Note: This practical paper consists of two parts A and B. Part A consists of ten practical topics. The
evaluation will be based on practical note book on six topics (ten marks each) out of total ten topics.
Part B consists of project report having 20 marks and Viva-voce of 20 marks. The evaluation will be
based on project report and performance during Viva-voce.
Part-B 40Marks
1. Project Report - 20 marks
2. Viva-voce - 20marks
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
M-SOCE-036.2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3
M-SOCE-036.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3
M-SOCE-036.4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 - 3 3
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
M-SOCE-036.1 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-036.2 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-036.3 3 3 3 3
M-SOCE-036.4 3 3 3 3
Average 3 3 3 3
75
Credits-2
Maximum Marks – 50
Time – 2Hours
Course Outcomes
1. Students of other disciplines will know about the discipline of sociology and its pioneer.
2. Students will learn about nature, scope and significance of sociology and its relation with
other social sciences.
3. Students will be familiarized with the basic sociological concepts.
4. Students will be acquainted with some social processes.
Note: Attempt any four questions out of the eight questions. All questions carry equal marks.
Unit–II Nature, Scope and Significance of Sociology; Sociology and Other Social Sciences
Unit–III Society, Culture, Social Group, Community, Association, Social Structure and Social
System; Status and Role;
Unit-IV Social Stratification, Social Mobility, Social Control; Social Change, Socialization; Social
Processes: Associative and Dissociative.
Suggested Readings
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
Average 3 3 3 3 - 2 2.5 2 2 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
Credits-2
Maximum Marks – 50
Time – 2Hours
Course Outcomes
1. Students will be able to understand historical mooring of Indian social structure.
2. Students will be well known to tradition and modernity, unity in diversity of Indian society
3. Students will learn about social institutions of Indian society.
4. Students will get an insight into various social problems and challenges of Indian society.
Note: - Attempt any four questions out of the eight questions. All questions carry equal marks.
Unit-I Indian Society: Historical Moorings of Indian Society, Indian Social Structure
Unit-II Modernity and Tradition, factors Contributing to the Diversity and Unity of Indian Society;
Caste and class; Recent Scenario.
Unit–IV Social Problems & Challenges: Communalism, Poverty, Violence against women, Child
Abuse, Sex Ratio.
Suggested Readings
Scale
1 If the contents of course have low correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a small extent) with the particular Programme outcome
2 If the contents of course have medium correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a reasonable extent) with the particular Programme outcome
3 If the contents of course have strong correlation (i.e. in agreement with the particular PO
to a large extent) with the particular Programme outcome
Same scale may be used to define the correlation between Cos and PSOs
Average 3 3 3 3 - 2 2.5 2 3 - 2 -
Note: It is not necessary that each CO has a correlation with all the POs.
Note: - *Course Code of Generic Elective Paper will be decided after opting the same by the student
Attainment of COs:
The attainment of COs can be measured on the basis of the results of internal assessment and semester examination.
The attainment is measured on scale of 3 after setting the target for COs attainment. Following table shows the CO
attainment levels assuming the set target of 60% marks:
CO Attainment Levels for internal assessment
Attainment Level
1
60% of students score more than 60% of marks in class tests of a course.
(low level of attainment)
2
70% of students score more than 60% of marks in class tests of a course.
(Medium level of attainment)
3
80% of students score more than 60% of marks in class tests of a course.
(High level of attainment)
Note: In the above table, the set target is assumed as 60%. It may vary in different departments/institutes. The staff councils of
the Departments/institutes may finalize the set target.
A proper mapping of course outcomes with assessment methods should be defined before measuring the attainment level.
The questions in tests for internal assessment are based on COs. Here it is assumed that class test-I is based on first two
COs (i.e. M-SOC-101.1 and M-SOC -101.2) of a course with equal weightage given to both COs. Similarly, class test-II
is based on next two COs (i.e. B- M-SOC-101.3 and M-SOC -101.4) of a course with equal weightage given to these two
COs. For each internal assessment test, the percentage of students attaining the target level of CO is estimated and average
80
percentage will decide the attainment level of COs. Following steps may be followed for determining the attainment
level in internal assessment of a course.
(i) Estimate the %age of students scoring set target (say 60%) or more in the question(s) of test -I based on first
CO i.e. M-SOC -101.1.
(ii) Estimate the %age of students scoring set target (60%) or more in the question(s) of test-I based on second
CO i.e. M-SOC -101.2.
(iii) Estimate the %age of students scoring set target (60%) or more in the question(s) of test-II based on third
CO i.e. M-SOC -101.3.
(iv) Estimate the %age of students scoring set target (60%) or more in the question(s) of test-II based on the
fourth CO i.e. M-SOC -101.4.
(v) Take average of the percentages obtained above.
(vi) Determine the attainment level i.e. 3, 2 or 1 as per scale defined in the above table.
Note: In the above steps, it is assumed that internal assessment is based on two tests only. However, if internal
assessment is based on more than two tests and/or on assignments then same may by incorporated to determine
the COs attainment level. There may be more than four COs for a course. The set target may also be different
for different COs. These issues may be resolved by the staff councils of the departments/institutes.
For determining the attainment levels for end semester examination, it is assumed that questions in the end term
examination are based on all COs of the course. Attainment levels for end semester examination of a course can
be determined after the declaration of the results. The CO attainment levels for end semester examination are
given in the following Table.
CO Attainment Levels for End Semester Examination (ESE)
Attainment Level
1 60% of students obtained letter grade of A or above (for CBCS programs) or score more
(Low level of attainment) than 60% of marks (for non-CBCS programs) in ESE of a course.
2 70% of students obtained letter grade of A or above (for CBCS programs) or score more
(Medium level of attainment) than 60% of marks (for non-CBCS programs) in ESE of a course.
3 80% of students obtained letter grade of A or above (for CBCS programs) or score more
(High level of attainment) than 60% of marks (for non-CBCS programs) in ESE of a course.
Note: In the above table, the set target is assumed as grade A for CBCS courses and 60% for non-CBCS Courses.
It may vary in different departments/institutes. The staff councils of the departments/institutes may finalize the set
target.
The overall COs attainment level can be obtained for all the courses of the programme in a similar manner.
Attainment of POs:
The overall attainment level of POs is based on the values obtained using direct and indirect methods in the ratio
of 80:20. The direct attainment of POs is obtained through the attainment of COs. The overall CO attainment
value as estimated above and CO-PO mapping value as shown in Table 3 are used to compute the attainment of
POs. PO attainment values obtained using direct method can be written as shown in the following Table.
81
The overall PO attainment values obtained above are compared with set target. The set target for each PO
may be different and can be finalized by the staff councils of the departments/institutes. If overall PO attainment
value is less than the set target value then an action plan may be prepared for improvement in the subsequent
academic session.
The overall PSO attainment level based on CO-PSO mapping values and overall CO attainment values can
be obtained in a similar manner.