Business Law and Practice
Business Law and Practice
Chapter 2 - Partnerships
● Formation of Partnerships and the PA
○ What is a partnership and how is it formed?
■ One way in which a business may be run - an unincorporated business
and not a separate legal entity
■ Agreement to operate in partnership can be oral or in writing or may
even be implied by conduct - not legally required to have a partnership
agreement but it is advantageous
● Partnership agreement - formal document setting out the terms
of a partnership, usually deals with the relationship between the
partners and their relationships with third parties - often varies or
amends default provisions under the PA 1890
○ Who can be a partner - generally any capable person - maximum number of
persons who could be a partner used to be 20 but professions like solicitors and
accountants were exempt - since 2002 there is no limit regardless
■ Any person can become a member of an LLP in accordance with an
agreement of existing members (majority)
■ Must have at least 2 designated members (if non are designated or only
one is then every member is deemed to be a designated member)
○ The Partnership Name
■ If it includes the name of any member on letters it must include all
members names (unless >20 provided it keeps a list at the principal
place of business)
■ Law relating to business names is contained in Part 41 of the CA 2006 -
no restrictions if name consists only of the surnames of all partners
without forenames or initials - in any other case the CA will apply and
certain words or expressions forming part of the business name will
require prior approval - including those in the Company, LLP and
Business Names Regulations 2014
■ Partnership that uses a business name must also comply with the
prescribed disclosure requirements under the CA - details about the
partners must appear at the main place of business and on partnership
stationary (need to include names of partners on stationary unless >21
partners)
■ Need details of the partnership at all of its addresses
● Partnership Agreements and the PA
○ Purpose of a Written Partnership Agreement - not a strict requirement but has
benefits like: providing evidence of partners relations and partnerships terms,
overrides some of the provisions of the PA which will automatically apply except
to the extent that there is contrary agreement - many default provisions have
undesirable consequences for modern partnerships
■ If an LLP and no LLP agreement the relationship between the LLP and
its members will be governed by the limited liability partnership
regulations 2001
○ Usual Clauses in a partnership agreement:
■ The parties - will be the partners, no new partner may be admitted
without the consent of all of the partners although sensible for smaller
partnerships this may be unworkable for larger ones - larger ones will
usually have a formal partnership agreement that does not require
unanimity
■ Commencement date - existence of a partnership is a question of fact -
partnership will exist from the date the S1 PA criteria are satisfied - thus
an agreement subsequent to that date will only govern rights and
responsibilities from that date
■ Nature and place of business - unanimity is required by the partners to
change the nature of the business (s24(8) PA)
■ Partnership name - need unanimity to change unless otherwise
provided for
■ Duration - partnership may run for a specific venture or a fixed term,
fixed term partnership that continues after expiry will be presumed to
continue on terms consistent with a partnership at will (no end date)
(s27(1)(PA) otherwise it will be dissolved (s32 PA). For partnerships at
will the following applies:
● Any partner may determine the partnership (bring it to an end) at
any time by giving notice to other partners - no requirement for
written notice - but it is how they are commonly determined
● Partnership shall be dissolved from the date specified in the
notice or date notice is given
● Remaining partners may seek to continue in what would be a
new business - usual to provide in the agreement that the
partnership will continue (technically as a new partnership)
despite the retirement death expulsion or bankruptcy of a partner
■ Capital - important to specify what each partner is contributing to the
business and how capital profits/ losses will be shared between the
partners - absent express or implied agreement to the contrary the PA
provided that profits and losses will be shared equally (S24(1) - may be
implied that unequal contributions of capital permit unequal withdrawals
but should be clear in agreement. Agreement may also provide for
interest to be paid on partners capital contributions
■ Income - agreement should specify how the income profits/ losses of
business will be shared between the partners - absent express or
implied agreement to the contrary income profits and losses will
be shared equally and this may not be suitable to clients specific
circumstances - agreement should also deal with the payment of
salaries from profits before the final profit shares are divided - PA does
not provide for salaries to be paid to partners and this could be
particularly important where not all partners work full time for the
business. Drawings - amount that partners withdraw on account of
profits - a well drafted agreement should deal with how and when
drawings are made and provide for repayment with interest if too much
is taken
■ Partnership Property - should be specified so that they are clearly
distinguishable from the assets belonging to individual partners - some
things may be owned by a partner but can be used for the purposes of
the business
● If a partner spends their own money in the ordinary conduct of
the firms business (ie dont have company card so spend own
and reimburse) they will be entitled to be refunded provided they
are acting in good faith - can be excluded by agreement though
■ Management - all partners are entitled to take part in the management
of the business (s24(5) PA) - may not always be what occurs as some
just invest in the business. All matters connected with the partnership
business may be decided by a majority of the partners (s24(8) PA) -
except for changing the nature of the business where unanimity is
required - thought should be given to whether unanimity should be
required for other decisions and whether a majority decision should
always be applicable - some issues may just be for senior partners to
decide on. Absences should be catered for
● Different if the share in the partnership is assigned - ie lender
takes share - cannot intermeddle at all or even require
production of accounts - is only entitled to receive profits from
the share and share of assets if dissolved
■ Retirement - retirement simply means leaving the partnership - PA does
not provide for the possibility of a partner leaving a partnership without it
being dissolved - significant shortcoming of the PA so usually
agreement has a mechanism for a partner to leave following appropriate
notice and get what is owed to them without dissolving the firm
● Absent any other agreement the outgoing partner or his estate is
entitled to such share of the profits made since dissolution as
attributable to his share in assets that he has a proprietary
interest in
■ Death and bankruptcy - unless otherwise agreed by partners the
partnership will be dissolved by death or bankruptcy of any partner - can
have serious consequences for continuing partners - provision should
be made in agreement for continuation of firm by surviving partners and
payment of the gone partners share
● Dead partners share of partnership assets will not go to her
estate - instead will be sold first as part of dissolution process
■ Expulsion - under PA no majority may expel any partner S25 PA - thus
an express power to expel a problem partner should be included
specifying grounds for expulsion and providing for patent of their shares
and provision that the partnership should continue rather than dissolving
as regards the remaining partners - with the other partners buying the
expelled partners share
● Can also be dissolved by the court if partnership itself is illegal or
automatically if the law changes making the business illegal, or a
partner applies under S.35 because a partner is permanently
incapable of performing his part, is guilty of a prejudicial offence,
breaches of the partnership agreement, is unable to profit, or it is
just and equitable
■ Payment for outgoing partners share - specific provision should be
made for the following:
● Remaining partners to purchase the share
● Valuation of outgoing partners share
● Payment of the outgoing partner share
● Dissolution if the option to purchase is not exercised - dissolution
takes place in accordance with provisions of the partnership
agreement or S44 of the PA - proceeds of sale are used to pay
third party and partner creditors and partners capital entitlements
○ Any balance is then divided between partners in
accordance with their profit sharing ratios
● May be a financial advantage in selling the business as a going
concern rather than dissolving
■ Restrictive covenants - consideration should be given as to whether
there should be a restriction on ex-partners competing, approaching
employees or former clients etc - nothing is provided for in PA so
provision must be made
■ Administrative Provisions - agreement will need sufficient administrative
provisions to make it workable - definitions and interpretation, service of
notices, costs and arbitration in the event of disputes
● Partners Duties to Each Other
○ Partners owe each other a duty of good faith and the PA provides for three
fiduciary duties
■ Duty to provide true accounts and full information on partnership matters
(s28 PA)
■ Duty to account for profits derived from the position as partner (s 29 PA)
● Or from the use of any partnership property
■ Duty to account for profits from a competing business (S 30 PA)
● Other partners can also obtain injunctive relief to restrain the
continuing competing trade
○ Many agreements have further provisions such as not to start or join any other
business while partner
○ Further provisions of the PA relate to the relationship between partners - in
usual way it can be varied by contrary agreement - include right to inspect
partnership books and payment of 5% interest on loans made by partners to the
firm (but no interest if it is just a capital investment)
■ These will be paid back after the creditors if the partnership is dissolved
○ Firm should indemnify partners where own funds were used in ordinary and
proper conduct of the business
● Liabilities to Third Parties
○ Is the partnership liable? - starting point is S5 of the PA based on the law of
agency - provides that each partner is an agent of their fellow partners and as
such a partner acting within the scope of their actual or apparent/ ostensible
authority will bind the partnership as a whole
○ Actual authority - partner is actually authorised to bind the partnership in the
circumstances whether under partnership agreement or through authority
through things like course of conduct
○ Apparent/ ostensible authority - would appear to the third party that the
transaction is authorised by the partnership in the circumstances
■ Is the transaction related to the partnership business?
■ Would a partner usually be expected to have authority to enter into the
transaction?
■ Does the third party know that the partner has no actual authority?
● This is different in companies - if a director enters a contract
which would normally need a resolution under the articles and
the third party is aware of this restriction - they are entitled to rely
on the belief that directors have full bower to bind the company
■ Does the third party know that the partner concerned is not in fact a
partner of the firm or do they have suspicions that this is the case?
○ (a) If a partner entered into a transaction with actual or apparent authority then
partnership will be bound by that act
○ (b) If not actual or apparent authority then partnership will not be bound – only
partner concerned (for example if the partnership told a company that 3
partners needed to approve contracts but entered into one with only 2 partners
- while normally this would be apparent authority as the company was informed
then the partnership would not be bound only the partners who entered
contract)
■ Example could be where acting outside of the usual way of business - if
a partner in a law firm gave financial advice - would not be course of
business and while personally liable the firm would not be
○ (c) If a partner entered with only apparent authority he will be liable to fellow
partners for breach of warranty of authority - partnership will still be bound and
third party contract not affected - individual partner will still be liable personally
to account to fellow partners for any loss to the partnership
○ Which Partners are Liable?
■ Once established whether the partnership as a whole is bound by a
transaction with a third party it must be established precisely which
partners are liable - partners are jointly and severally liable for debts and
obligations of the partnership without limit (S9 PA) - where unable to pay
its debts out of partnership assets a creditor can obtain payment from
private assets of the partners
■ In the case of fraud, wrongful acts and omissions by one partner, the
partnership will be liable if it can be established that it was in the course
of business (partner will also be liable - could sue any partner or
partnership)
■ Changes of partners - important to distinguish between existing debts
(those incurred prior to the change) and future debts (those incurred
after the change)
● Partner is liable for the debts incurred whilst they are a partner
(s9)
● New partner is not liable for debts incurred by the partnership
before they became a partner (s17(1)(PA)
● Retiring partner is not released from debts incurred by the
partnership whilst they were a partner (s17(2)) - retiring partner
may seek to protect themselves from liability for existing debts
through a deed of release, a novation agreement or an indemnity
●
Type of document Description Effect
Calling and notice Any director may call a BM at any time or require the company
secretary to do so (MA9)
Voting Show of hands or oral assent (MA7(1)) - each member has one
vote - not based on percentage of shares
Resolutions and majority BRs - simple majority required (deadlock if equity of votes and
MA13 does not apply)
■ Conflicts of interest
● MA14 prevents a director from voting and counting towards the
quorum on any Board meeting decision in which they have a
personal interest - ie buying or selling property from or to the
company - conflicts with the fiduciary duties owed to the
company - can still count as a shareholder
● MA14(3)(a) allows a company to suspend or relax the general
application of MA14 or
● S177 and 182 CA require a director to declare the nature and
extent of a personal interest in a proposed or existing transaction
or arrangement subject to limited exceptions (declaration of a
conflict of interest is separate from voting and counting towards
quorum) - will be voted on by members of the board but can
also write to all directors
○ Will not need to declare it if it is already been mentioned
that they have an interest and the members are aware or
the interest
○ Do not need to declare if it is unlikely to lead to a conflict
of interest
○ Do not need to declare if it is a service contract
■ Minutes of BMs - must be kept for at least 10 years in the minutes book
(don't need to keep those of general meetings though)
■ Unanimous decisions - MA8 provides that a procedure for unanimous
decision making may be used instead of holding a BM - enables the
directors to make decisions in writing or more informally
○ Exercise of Shareholders Powers: GMs
■ Powers of members are laid down in the CA and articles - generally
exercise their powers by passing resolutions in GMs (2 types):
● AGM - annual general meeting - if formed on or after 1 october
2007 is not required - if before and articles have not been
amended then this will be required. 21 clear days notice
(unanimity if earlier)
○ Quorum for private - 2 (1 if only one member)
○ Public companies still need to have them
○ Single member companies dont need them but should
write down their resolutions
● EGM/ GM - any other general meeting 0 can be called at
discretion of directors whenever, by members of >5% share
capital/ voting rights (paid up), if members request then directors
must call within 21 days (doesnt mean working days) and 28
days of the call. Must have 14 clear days notice (shorter if
>90/95% (private/public) of voting rights request
○ Need 28 days notice if a special thing like removing
directors or auditors
■ Two types of resolution:
● Ordinary Resolution - requires simple majority of shareholders
attending and voting at a GM
● Special resolution - requires 75% majority or more of
shareholders attending and voting at a GM (shareholders NOT
shares) all special resolutions must be filed at CH within 15 days
of being passed
■ Can also pass resolutions without a meeting or without a written
resolution if all members agree to it (Duomatic principle) - even if
outside of articles of association
● It is also possible to entrench something - ie if say it cant be
changed - will be able to change but will need unanimity - SR
wont be enough
○ If have a provision for entrenchment anywhere in the
articles - will need to submit a statement of compliance to
CH whenever articles are changed (alongside amended
articles and resolution) even if the articles being changed
are not entrenched provisions
■ Cant use a written resolution if removing a director or auditor from office
- must have a GM
■ Key provisions of GMs
■
Calling and notice Usually the directors call a GM (s
302)
Shareholders power to
requisition a GM
14 clear days notice required -in
effect 16 as do not include date
of service and date of meeting)
Change of company name (takes effect from when new certificate is issued)
Change articles (but takes effect from date of SR - unless it is changing the
specified purpose of the business if the company decided to select one)
Appointment of chairperson
75% Pass SR
50% Block ordinary resolution
5% Requisition a GM
○ Minority Shareholder Protection
■ Petition for unfairly prejudicial conduct (s994 CA) - member can petition
the court for an order that the company’s affairs have been or are
proposed to be conducted in a way that is both prejudicial and unfair to
them, in this case the shareholder is the proper claimant - can cover a
whole range of conduct - e.g. refusing to pay dividends when can cover
a whole range of conduct - e.g. refusing to pay dividends when properly
payable exclusion from management or excessive pay being awarded to
directors e.g. promising that will be able to appoint a director if purchase
shares but then company refusing to- most popular order of the court is
that the shareholder is bought out
● Cant bring on behalf of another shareholder if themselves have
not been unfairly prejudiced
■ Derivative action (S260 - 264 - no longer a common law remedy) - claim
by shareholder that act or omission of a director in breach of their
directors duties - negligence, default or breach of duty or trust
● Shareholders cannot bring a claim against directors if directors
breach has caused a loss in the form of a decrease in share
value if the company can bring the claim itself - unless suing in
another capacity such as a creditor
■ Winding up on the just and equitable ground (s122(g) IA) - most drastic
remedy and enables a member to apply to wind up the company on the
basis that it is just and equitable to do so - e.g. due to total breakdown
of communication or total deadlock/ inability to make decisions/ cant
fulfil its intended purpose/ member has been excluded from
management despite genuine expectation of being entitled to participate