Engineering Department Today… Chapter 8: Project Scheduling Four-Dimensional Modeling 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Estimating Activity Durations 8.3 Bar Charts 8.4 Activity Precedence Diagrams Four-Dimensional Modeling •Four-dimensional (4-D) technologies are now being used by planners, designers, and, engineers to analyze and visualize many aspects of a construction project, from the three-dimensional (3-D) design of a project to the sequence of construction to the relationships among schedule, cost, and resource availability data. •These intelligent 4-D models support computer-based analysis of schedules with respect to cost, interference, safety, etc., and improve communication of design and schedule information. Project Scheduling: Introduction •As discussed in the previous chapter, a project’s work breakdown structure (WBS) defines work packages that can be sequenced (scheduled) to coordinate the project construction. •The resulting project schedule is of paramount importance for many management functions, such as the proper coordination of material procurement and subcontractor mobilization. •The schedule provides a concise means to communicate the intended construction strategy and can reveal any inconsistencies in its design. Project Scheduling: Introduction •This chapter examines the steps required to develop a project schedule. They involve: 1. Breaking down the scope of the work into manageable portions, namely its activities. This first step was discussed in the previous chapter. 2. Estimating each activity’s duration. 3. Establishing sequence relationships among activities. If one activity is called fabricate formwork for deck A and another is called pour concrete for deck A, then finishing the former is a necessary condition for executing the latter. 4. Finding the earliest and latest possible times for the execution of each activity. This is determined by the duration of the activities and their mutual relationships. Project Scheduling: Introduction •This chapter examines the steps required to develop a project schedule. They involve: 5. Looking up the project’s critical sequence of activities and the leeway that activities not included in this sequence can have. This step is an outcome from the scheduling of the previous step. 6. Reviewing, optimizing, communicating, updating, and in general, using the schedule. Estimating Activity Durations •After a list of activities is developed, the duration of each one must be estimated. The duration of any activity is largely determined by: oThe nature of the work that the activity entails. All other factors being equal, a concrete pour in the 50th floor of a building is likely to take longer than one in the 2nd floor. oThe quantities of the work. Quite evidently, an activity involving 6,000 square foot of formwork will take longer than another consisting of 3,000 square foot. oThe technique used for the task. A concrete pour usually takes longer if it is done using a tower and buggies than if it is done with a concrete pump. Estimating Activity Durations •After a list of activities is developed, the duration of each one must be estimated. The duration of any activity is largely determined by: oThe resources used to perform the work. Twenty masons are likely to finish the same amount of work in a shorter time than 15 masons. A larger fleet of scrapers will finish an earthmoving operation faster than a smaller one, if the conditionsdiscussed are met. oThe working hours for the resources. An activity will be finished in fewer days if it is performed using 10-hour shifts instead of 8-hour shifts. Estimating Activity Durations •With all the factors considered here, it would appear that estimating durations is a colossal endeavor. In fact, there are many ways to simplify this part of the scheduling process. Figure 8.1 shows an excerpt from Building Construction Costs, published annually by R. S. Means, Inc. It shows the ‘‘normal’’ productivity for a crew fabricating and placing footing formwork. Similar data are available in other sources. Bar Charts •The basic modeling concept of the bar chart is the representation of a project work item or activity as a time scaled bar whose length represents the planned duration of the activity. •Figure 8.2(a) shows a bar representation for a work item requiring four project time units (e.g., weeks). •The bar is located on a timeline to indicate the schedule for planned start, execution, and completion of the project work activity. Bar Charts •Project bar chart models are developed by breaking down the project into a number of components. •In practice, the breakdown rarely exceeds 50 to 100 work activities and generally focuses on physical components of the project. Bar Charts •One disadvantage of the traditional bar chart is the lack of precision in establishing the exact sequence between activities. •This problem can be addressed by using directional links or arrows connecting the bars to give a precise indication of logical order between activities. •This connected bar chart is sometimes referred to as a bar- net. •A connected bar chart (bar-net) showing the major activities defined in the preliminary project breakdown diagram for the small gas station (Figure 7.4) is shown in Figure 8.4. •The bars are positioned in sequence against a time line. Bar Charts •The sequence or logic between the bars is formalized by connecting the end of the preceding bar to the start of the following bar, as for instance, the end of bar 3. •Erect building structure is connected using a directional link or arrow to the two activities that follow it (Activities 5 and 4). •Positioning the eight activities as bars in their logical sequence using the arrow connectors against a timeline plotted in weeks allows us to visually determine that the duration of the entire project is roughly 20 weeks. Bar Charts •This diagram also allows one to determine the expected progress on the project as of any given week. •For example, as of week 11, Activities 1, 2, and 3 should be completed. •Activities 4 and 5 should be in progress. If we assume a linear rate of production (i.e., half of a 2- week activity is completed after 1 week), we could assume that one-third of activities 4 and 5 will be completed as of the end of week 11. Activity Precedence Diagrams •A precedence diagram is a graphical tool that shows a project’s activities as rectangles or circles joined by arrows indicating their mutual dependency or relationship. •The resulting network clearly indicates the intended sequence of activities, as shown in Figure 8.5, and is the fundamental graphical component of the Critical Path Method (CPM), whose scheduling mechanism will be discussed in detail later in this chapter. Activity Precedence Diagrams •A precedence diagram is a graphical tool that shows a project’s activities as rectangles or circles joined by arrows indicating their mutual dependency or relationship. •The resulting network clearly indicates the intended sequence of activities, as shown in Figure 8.5, and is the fundamental graphical component of the Critical Path Method (CPM), whose scheduling mechanism will be discussed in detail later in this chapter.