0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views

Cryptoscam

Cryptoscam

Uploaded by

sherwin romualdo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views

Cryptoscam

Cryptoscam

Uploaded by

sherwin romualdo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Why Crypto Is a NWO Scam

The future of Bitcoin may be a dystopia in which Big Brother controls what’s
called “the blockchain” and decides when and how you can buy or sell
anything and everything.

Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have been touted as decentralized, freedom-oriented


alternatives to traditional fiat “funny money” like Federal Reserve Notes that are controlled
from the top down by private central banks. So everyone was hyped about it being the
“alternative” that will end the central banks and give freedom to the ones using it. But the
truth of the matter is that cryptocurrencies are actually much worse than fiat currencies in
terms of the level of control they afford to elitist interests.

Anyone with a little bit of brain can understand that cryptocurrency is basically a dream
come true for the New World Order. Not only do fictitious digital “coins” like Bitcoin stand
to replace all forms of paper and metal money – which is exactly what the elites want – but
they’re also easily trackable, leaving “footprints” in the blockchain for every transaction
that takes place. Why is everyone so against CBDC’s (digital currency), but not against
crypto (digital currency)?

All that has to happen now is for the various fiat currencies of the world to collapse, followed
by a crypto that will “rise from the ashes” to collectively take their place.

Most crypto gurus today know that ANY cryptocurrency that is based on a blockchain
ledger is highly traceable. There are no anonymous digital transactions no matter how
savvy a person thinks they are.

The shadow government is behind it, propping it up as some kind of “revolution” in money
when in fact it’s nothing more than a Trojan Horse designed to seize more control over the
people.

International and central banks were deeply involved in building the infrastructure needed to
make blockchain technology go global and universal, it became obvious that bitcoin and
other coins were merely a pregame test for the introduction of something rather sinister.

“Blockstream is now controlled by the Bilderberg Group. AXA Strategic Ventures, co-lead
investor for Blockstream's $55 million financing round, is the investment arm of French
insurance giant AXA Group - whose CEO Henri de Castries has been *chairman* of the
Bilderberg Group since 2012.” - Quote from The Central Bankers Evil Blockchain

Something suspicious is going on with Bitcoin and the Distributed ledger technology (DLT)
today. Think about it, why governments have been patiently watching blockchain
technology develop and grow outside their control for the past eight years?

The governments don’t like competition, especially when it comes to money. Governments
know they cannot stop blockchain, in fact they don’t even want to. What they want is to
control it using powers of regulation, taxation, and investigation and ultimately more
coercive powers including arrest and imprisonment of individuals who refuse to obey
government mandates with regard to blockchain.

Blockchain is as dependent on the system more than any other currency. It depends on
critical infrastructure including servers, telecommunications networks, the banking system,
and the power grid, all of which are subject to government control.

But why would anyone trade freedom for more centralization?

First, existing cryptocurrencies are not as free as many people believe, with ample
government tracking of blockchain transactions in place for years, the notion of the
completely anonymous crypto user is a bit of a fantasy.

Secondly, the crypto market is highly unstable, in part because it is still very limited.

Third, crypto is enticing to people because of the quick profits that can be had, but
massive losses are also a danger.

All of these factors and more can be used by banking elites as a rationale for the
implementation of CBDCs and global regulation of crypto trading. And, if the bloodbath in
existing coins continues, people may even welcome CBDCs as a “safe” investment or
currency system.

“The introduction of Bitcoin was to get society used to a cashless society, and to get
libertarians to build the central banker control system for them.” - Quote from The Central
Bankers Evil Blockchain

Consider the following additional developments:

● On August 1, 2017, the SEC announced “Guidance on Regulation of Initial Coin


Offerings,” the first step toward requiring fundraising through blockchain-based
tokens to register with the government.
● On August 1, 2017, the World Economic Forum, host body to the Davos conference
of global super-elites, published a paper entitled “Four reasons to question the hype
around blockchain.”
● On August 7, 2017, China announced they will begin using blockchain to collect
taxes and issue “electronic invoices” to citizens there.

Perhaps most portentously, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has weighed in. In a
special report dated June 2017, the IMF had this to say about blockchain:

“Distributed ledger technology (DLT), in particular, could spur change in the financial sector.
…. DLT can be categorized as “permissionless” or “permissioned” depending on who can
participate in the consensus-driven validation process. Permissionless DLTs allow anyone to
read, transact on, and participate in the validation process. These open schemes (that
underlie Bitcoin, for instance) could be very disruptive if successfully implemented.
By contrast, in permissioned DLTs, the validation process is controlled by a
pre-selected group of participants (“consortium”) or managed by one organization
(“fully-private”), and thus serve more as a common communications platform.” (emphasis
added).

These and other developments all point toward an elite group including the IMF, JPMorgan,
the Davos crowd, the IRS, SEC, and other agencies converging to shut down the existing
free-wheeling blockchain ecosphere, and replace it with a “permissioned” system under
“consortium” control.

For more evidence, let’s take a look at the top shareholders of the number one blockchain
company in the world right now - Coinbase Global Inc.:

We clearly see the two most common mega corporations in that list: Vanguard Group Inc.
and Blackrock Inc. Ah yes, our favourites.

Besides the mega corporations, according to one study, 74% of the central banks globally
are interested in blockchain technology. Among the leaders are the US Federal Reserve,
the Bank of England and the European Central Bank. Among the most discussed use
cases are central bank digital currencies (retail and wholesale), interbank securities
settlement and data exchange platforms. Why would they be so interested in DLT/blockchain
technology if they’re so against cryptocurrencies?
Here is a link to an in-depth report by WEF on “Central Banks and Distributed Ledger
Technology: How are Central Banks Exploring Blockchain Today?”:

Central Bank Activity In Blockchain - WEF Report

And here is great research on Central Bank Plans for Digital Ledger Technology (DLT) and
Cryptocurrency:

The Central Bankers Evil Blockchain

I suggest you go over, or better study, both of the reports above and come to your own
conclusions. Note that I am not pushing a certain belief you have to adopt, I am simply
bringing the obvious, the evidence, into light for it to be evaluated and looked at from a
different perspective, no matter how supportive of cryptocurrency you are at this moment.

Also take a look at one of my recent reels if you haven’t already, where you can see who is
really behind Bitcoin:

Click Here To Watch It

You might also like